ACLU letter to Ferguson City Clerk
-
Upload
nick-kasoff -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
description
Transcript of ACLU letter to Ferguson City Clerk
March 24, 2015
Megan Asikainen
Ferguson City Clerk
110 Church St.
Ferguson, MO 63135
Re: Circulation of Mayoral Recall Petitions
Clarification by City Clerk Requested
Dear Ms. Asikainen:
The American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri (“ACLU”) defends and expands
the constitutional rights and civil liberties guaranteed to all Missourians under the
United States and Missouri Constitutions. We fulfill our mission through
legislative advocacy, public education, and – when necessary – litigation.
Permissible Signature Gatherers for Mayoral Recall Petition
We have received reports that the Ferguson City Clerk’s Office has indicated it
would reject petition signatures submitted for the recall of Ferguson’s mayor,
unless those signatures were personally collected by one of the five qualified voters
who commenced the recall.
To avoid confusion and potential litigation on this issue, the ALCU encourages you
to clarify that the City Clerk will not attempt to enforce a purported
requirement that petition signatures may only be collected by the five
individuals who began the recall process.
Missouri Law Favors Recall Process
Recall elections became an essential part of the American political process in the
early 20th century so as to give voters a check on the activities of their elected
officials above and beyond their power to elect another candidate when the
incumbent’s term expired. See Meiners v. Bering Strait School District, 687 P.2d
287, 294 (Alaska 1984). Recall in Missouri was founded on the same principle. In
Missouri, the recall process is a political one, in which all doubts about recall
procedures are construed in favor of placing the recall question before the voters.
3601 Main Street Kansas City, MO 64111 (816) 470-9933 454 Whittier Street St. Louis, MO 63108 (314) 652-3114
www.aclu-mo.org BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Brad Pierce President
Shontaia Riley Pam Woodard Vice Presidents
Bob Waugh Treasurer
Daron Smith Secretary
Terry Bloomberg St. Louis Tricia Bushnell Kansas City Susan Carlson St. Louis Nimrod Chapel Jefferson City Denise Field St. Louis Laurie Hauber St. Louis Robert King St. Louis David Nelson St. Louis Aaron Novack St. Louis Bill Raney Kansas City Allen Rostron Kansas City Annette Slack Columbia Joseph Stimpfl St. Louis Steven Streen Kansas City Erica Warren Columbia Jeffrey A. Mittman Executive Director
Megan Asikainen, Ferguson City Clerk
Clarification re Circulation of Mayoral Recall Petitions
March 24, 2015
Page 2
American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri 3601 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111 | Phone: 816-470-9933 454 Whittier Street, St. Louis, MO 63108 | Phone: 314-652-3114
Fax: 314-652-3112 | www.aclu-mo.org
Missouri courts have consistently upheld these principles. See State ex rel. Voss v. Davis, 418
S.W.2d 163, 167 (Mo. 1967) (“Provisions reserving to the people the powers of initiative and
referendum are given a liberal construction to effectuate the policy thereby adopted. Such
provisions should be construed so as to make effective the reservation of power to the people.”);
State ex rel. Blackwell v. Travers, 600 S.W.2d 100, 113 (Mo. App. 1980); State ex rel. City Council
of City of Gladstone v. Yeaman, 768 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988); State ex rel. Ferro v.
Oellermann, 458 S.W.2d 583, 587 (Mo. Ct. App. 1970).
Scope of City Clerk Duties
The role of the City Clerk in the recall procedure is ministerial. See Vowell v. Kander, 451 S.W.3d
267, 275 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014), opinion adopted and reinstated after retransfer (July 17, 2014)
(holding that a ministerial officer “is required to carry out his or her statutory duties to the letter
of the law and must treat all persons filing properly executed legal documents with his office
equally”).
In Missouri, “[i]f a sufficient number of valid signatures appear on the [recall] petition and the
petition is in proper form[, the clerk] has no choice but to certify it as sufficient to the council.”
Oellermann, 458 S.W.2d at 587. The interpretation of who may gather the signatures on the
recall petition is not in the hands of the city clerk. The only discretion afforded to the city
clerk is to determine “whether a given name is that of a person entitled to sign the petition[;]”
otherwise the city clerk’s job regarding the validity of signatures to the recall petition “is
essentially arithmetical and ministerial.” Oellermann, 458 S.W.2d at 586, (emphasis added).
Any suggestion that signatures will only be counted by your office if they have been collected by
one of the five originators of the recall effort is beyond your authority.
Limitations on Petition Circulation Violate First Amendment
Seeking to limit who might circulate a recall petition violates the First Amendment. Those who
favor a recall “seek by petition to achieve political change in [Missouri]; their right freely to engage
in discussions concerning the need for change is guarded by the First Amendment.” Meyer v.
Grant, 486 U.S. 414, 421 (1988). “Petition circulation . . . is core political speech.” Buckley v.
America Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 186 (1999). First Amendment
protection for activity related to the gathering of signatures for recall petitions is “at its zenith.”
Chandler v. City of Arvada, Col., 292 F.3d 1236, 1241 (10th Cir. 2002). Moreover, those who
would sign a petition have a strong First Amendment interest in having their signatures recognized.
Rejecting those signatures based on who circulated the petition would be unconstitutional.
“[I]nitiative, referendum and recall are rights reserved by the people, and as such are to be
construed to make effective the reservation of power by the people. It is not in keeping with such
construction to allow those rights to be thwarted by the act of a single individual.” Oellermann,
Megan Asikainen, Ferguson City Clerk
Clarification re Circulation of Mayoral Recall Petitions
March 24, 2015
Page 3
American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri 3601 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111 | Phone: 816-470-9933 454 Whittier Street, St. Louis, MO 63108 | Phone: 314-652-3114
Fax: 314-652-3112 | www.aclu-mo.org
458 S.W.2d at 587. The ACLU of Missouri calls on you to promptly clarify that you will not
endeavor to discard the signatures of Ferguson voters who sign recall petitions based on who
circulated the petition.
Interpretation of Ferguson Charter
Constitutional issues aside, however, any interpretation of Ferguson’s Charter that posits the
Charter as imposing a limitation on who can circulate recall petitions lacks merit. The Charter
merely observes that the initiators of a recall effort will “be responsible for circulating the petition,”
among other things. That does not mean that they are the only ones who may circulate a petition.
For instance, the City Code provides that the City Clerk, “will be responsible for maintenance and
control of all records.” § 2-27.10. Of course, no one would suggest this responsibility means that
you the City Clerk and City Clerk alone is the only person in all of Ferguson government who may
maintain or control a public record. And while the Clerk is “responsible for” the preparing and
distributing of ballots (§ 7-3), no one would reasonably contend that the Clerk is required to do so
alone.
Likewise, the fact that those initiating the recall procedure are responsible for circulating the
petition cannot be construed as suggesting that they are the only ones who may circulate the
petition.
Immediate Resolution Requested
In order to avoid confusion and the need for litigation, the ACLU requests that you immediately
clarify that the City Clerk will not attempt to enforce a purported requirement that petition
signatures may only be collected by the five individuals who began the recall process.
Please feel free to contact the undersigned at (314) 669-3416 or [email protected] if you
need any additional information. We look forward to working with you and your office to
expeditiously and cooperatively resolve this matter.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey A. Mittman
Executive Director