AclaraConnect 2019 AMI Communication Technologies …
Transcript of AclaraConnect 2019 AMI Communication Technologies …
Power System Engineering, Inc.www.powersystem.org
AclaraConnect 2019
AMI Communication Technologies Overview
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc. 3
Kyle KopczykManager of Utility Automation
Phone: (608) 268-3539Email: [email protected]
Power System Engineering, Inc.
1532 W. Broadway
Madison, WI 53713
Web Site at: www.powersystem.org
About the Presenter: Kyle has a BS degree in Electrical Engineering from
Michigan Technological University and an MBA from the Minnesota School of
Business. He has 10+ years of experience in the utility industry focusing on
AMI/AMR, demand response, MultiSpeak, and others. Kyle also works closely
on technology work plans, procurements, business cases, and design & project
management. Kyle is a subject matter expert in PSE’s AMI and Smart Grid
practice areas.
PSE Introductions
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Definitions and Acronyms
• AMR = Automated Meter Reading
– Includes drive-by and one-way communications
• AMI = Advanced Metering Infrastructure
– Two-way communications to modules in meters
– Includes the communications infrastructure
• Main types of AMI systems:
– Power Line Carrier / Communication (PLC)
• Communications to the meters over power lines
– Private Wireless
• Point-to-multipoint (PMP) from tower to meter or “mesh” of meters to collector
– Cellular
– Fiber/Wireless
• Leverages fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) – not direct to the meter. Wi-Fi to meter is coming.
5
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Meter Reading Technology Evolution
6
Manual
• Monthly kWh reading
• EM Meters
Drive-by
• One-way wireless
• Monthly kWh reading
• EM meters
AMR
• One-way PLC or Drive-by
• Monthly kWh
• Digital meter
AMI
• Two-way
• Digital meter
• Daily kWh, kW
• Interval data
• Outage mgmt.
Smart Grid
• HAN
• DA
• Web portal
EM = Electro-mechanical
AMR = Automated Meter Reading
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
AMI = Advanced Metering Infrastructure
2nd Gen. AMI
• Improved Outage Notification
• Transport for DA
• Growth of DSM over AMI
2019
3rd Gen. AMI
• > Resiliency
• Private backhaul
• Better use of MDMs
• Interoperability and IOT support
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
System Components
7
Headquarters
• AMI master
• MDMS
• DRMS
• NMS
• Integrations
Wide Area Network
• Backbone communications
• Public or private
• Microwave, fiber, cellular, etc.
• Towers, substations, offices
Neighborhood Area Network
• AMI collectors – towers, substations, poles
• AMI repeaters
• AMI meters –mesh or P2MP
Home Area Network
• Load control switches
• Smart thermostats
• ZigBee, Wi-Fi
• Distributed generation
• Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs)
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Power Line Carrier / Communications• Power Line Carrier / Communications
(PLC) AMI systems add a modulated carrier signal to distribution power lines.
• Very few new Power Line Carrier systems are being deployed as compared to RF
• Components may include transformer modulation (control) units, substation control units, current-transformers (CTs)
• Advantages:– 100%* reads if meter has power– Detect phase, line/device issues
• Disadvantages– Slower data rates and longer latency– No last gasp, water or gas Support; limited DA
• Vendors:– Aclara, Cooper, Landis+Gyr
9
Aclara TWACS PLC AMI
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Point to Multipoint (P2MP) AMI
11
• P2MP (fixed or tower-based) AMI systems communicate between a tower and an endpoint. Some systems support one “hop” between endpoints.
• Components may include towers, master radios at the towers, and AMI modules in meters and field devices.
• Advantages:– Typically simplified backhaul from
a few masters– Direct support for multiple utilities
• Disadvantages– Cannot detect phase*, line/device
issues– Access to height can be more
critical
• Vendors:– Sensus, Aclara, and Tantalus
11
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Point-to-Multipoint AMI• Point-to-multipoint communication is
providing multiple paths from a single
location to multiple locations.
• Collectors are located at a tower or
poles.
• 900 MHz, 450 MHz, and 220 MHz
licensed radio is used to communicate
directly with collector/tower.
• Each frequency is broken into different
segments/parts or channels. The
channels can be dedicated to a specific
need (LM, Meter Readings, DA, etc.). At
full duplex capability.
12
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Tower-based AMI Vendor Components
13
220 MHz
R220 900
220 MHz and 900 MHz
Repeater
900 MHz ISM LAN to either
Meters or LM switches
R
220 900
R
220 900
R
220 MHz 900 MHz Mesh
900 MHz Mesh
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Wireless Mesh AMI
• Mesh = Multipoint-to-Multipoint
• Meters communicate “peer-to-peer” using an unlicensed wireless frequency (900 MHz or 2.4 GHz)
• Collectors are strategically located where they can “talk to” as many meters as possible. From collectors, data is backhauled on the WAN to the main office.
• Usually self-healing in the event a mesh node is not available, messages are re-routed to a different path.
• Vendors:
– Eaton/Cooper, Elster, Landis+Gyr, Tantalus, Trilliant, Itron, Silver Spring Networks, NexGrid
14
Mesh AMI
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Cellular AMI – 100% Cellular or Partial Use
• Cellular AMI
– Both AT&T and Verizon offer a turnkey AMI cellular solution
– Several AMI vendors have a cellular-based product lines
– Good for hard to reach areas or where wireless AMI may be too costly
– Most modules run on current 4G (some still 3G) networks
– May not be an option in areas of poor cellular coverage
Cellular
15
C&I Meters
Residential Meters
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Mesh vs. Point-to-Multipoint
Point-to-Multipoint Network
Two unreachable remotes, would
require another collection site or
gap fill device
Wireless Mesh Network
All endpoints are reachable, but
more connections increase latency
16
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Hybrid AMI
• There are various ways a system could be considered “hybrid”:
– PLC with complete system overlay of wireless AMI (Mesh or P2MP)
– PLC with pockets of AMI and cellular
– Dual band cellular/mesh/licensed with other AMI and PLC combinations
• Hybrid solutions tend to be temporary gap fillers until a full system migration becomes economical. Typically, that is when the old AMR/AMI system is completely end of life.
23
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Partial Deployment – High Value Meters• Overlay wireless AMI to
cover areas of greatest value and importance
• P2MP-based AMI has the ability to cover larger areas without the need of meters meshing to obtain coverage
• A Mesh AMI partial deployment would generally require greater installations of collectors and repeaters than a full deployment
– However, the greater amount of AMI equipment increases resiliency and redundancy
24
All Meters
The AMI mesh collectors and repeaters typically represent less than 15% of the total
infrastructure costs.
Partial Meters
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
P2MP-Based AMI – High Value MetersP2MP-based AMI has the ability to cover larger areas without the need of meters meshing to obtain coverage
25
Can easily
determine what
meters not to
convert to AMI
versus needing a
mesh to exist to
obtain coverage
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Utility #1: Wireless AMI Mesh
25% Wireless AMI
Deployment
100% Wireless AMI
Deployment
1 Technology Type 900 Mesh 900 Mesh
2 Assumed Signal Distance 2,500 ft. 2,500 ft.
3 End Point Quantity 32,000 130,000
26
• A 25% initial deployment would likely cover important
services:
❑ Prepaid metering
❑ C&I meters with five min. interval readings
❑ DA end points
❑ Remote disconnect/reconnect
❑ Load management switches
❑ Smart thermostats
❑ Bellwether Metering Points
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Utility #1: Wireless AMI Mesh Conclusion
29
25% Wireless AMI
Deployment
100% Wireless AMI
Deployment
1 Technology Type 900 Mesh 900 Mesh
2 Assumed Signal Distance 2,500 ft. 2,500 ft.
3 End Point Quantity 25,000 100,000
4 Collector Count 180 200
5 Repeater Count 120 50
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Typical Cost Differences – Utility #1 MeshCost Categories
Utility #2 Partial Deployment
Quantity Unit Cost Extended Cost
Servers, Integration and Project Management 1 $150,000 $150,000
Collectors & Repeaters 300 $3,000 $900,000
Residential, 3-Ph, and Installation 25,000 $160 $4,000,000
Total $5,050,000
30
Cost Categories
Utility #2 Full Deployment
Quantity Unit Cost Extended Cost
Servers, Integration and Project Management 1 $200,000 $200,000
Collectors & Repeaters 250 $3,000 $750,000
Residential, 3-Ph, and Installation 100,000 $150 $15,000,000
Total $15,950,000
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Utility #2: Wireless AMI P2MP
25% Wireless AMI
Deployment
100% Wireless AMI
Deployment
1 Technology Type Licensed Licensed
2 End Point Quantity 3,300 13,000
31
• A 25% initial deployment would likely cover important services:
❑ Prepaid metering
❑ C&I meters with five min. interval readings
❑ DA end points
❑ Remote disconnect/reconnect
❑ Load management switches
❑ Smart thermostats
❑ Bellwether metering points
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Utility #2: Wireless AMI P2MP Conclusion
34
25% Wireless AMI
Deployment
100% Wireless AMI
Deployment
1 Technology Type Licensed Licensed
2 End Point Quantity 3,300 13,000
3 Base Stations 5 5
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Cost Differences – Utility #2 P2MP
Cost Categories
Utility #2 25% Partial Deployment
Quantity Unit Cost Extended
Cost
Servers, Integration and Project Management 1 $50,000 $50,000
Base Stations 5 $75,000 $375,000
Residential, 3-Ph, and Installation 3,300 $160 $525,000
Total $950,000
35
Cost Categories
Utility #2 100% Full Deployment
Quantity Unit Cost Extended
Cost
Servers, Integration and Project Management 1 $100,000 $100,000
Collectors & Repeaters 5 $75,000 $375,000
Residential, 3-Ph, and Installation 13,000 $150 $2,000,000
Total $2,475,000
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Current PLC OfferingsFeature Supported PLC – Varies Slightly by Vendor
Interval Data Options Residential – 2 Channels @ 15/30/60 min
Commercial – 4 Channels @ 15/30/60 min
Interval Data Reporting Varies, depends on the polling of the meter data or
read request scripts and quantity of meters.
Could be a few minutes to a few days.
Outage and Restoration Via ping request (checking for a response)
Automatically via OMS or other vendor features
Electrical Path / Phasing Electrical path needs to be set/updated
Phase can be detected and reported
Meter Manufacturers Supported Varies by vendor – most support multiple meter
manufacturers
Distribution Automation Support varies, but typically Cap Banks –
regulators & reclosers require other communication
paths37
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Current PLC OfferingsFeature Supported PLC – Varies Slightly by Vendor
Load Management Support Typically a 2 & 3 relay device available
More relay support in development or custom
Supports 2-way communication
Distributed Generation / Energy
Resources / EV Charging
No Support for “smart” invertors
Net metering supported
Street / Security Light Controls No support today
Vendor roadmap
Pre-paid Metering Supported – MDMS or system capable of VEE
suggested in place
Home Area Network (HAN) No Support
Voltage Intervals and Min/Max supported – length of
interval and detail varies by meter/vendor
Gas and Water Meters No Support
38
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Current Industry RF Offerings
39
Feature Supported RF (As an Industry)
Interval Data Options Res. – 4 Channels (or more) @ 1/5/15/30/60 min
C&I – 4 Channels (or more) @ 1/5/15/30/60 min
Interval Data Reporting Residential typically @ 60 min
Commercial typically @ 15 min
Seeing down to 1 min reporting intervals
Outage and Restoration Automatic / unsolicited
Configurable for message and timers (blink vs.
momentary vs. sustained)
Some rely on software for filtering others are using
the edge device to make decisions
Electrical Path / Phasing Reads not affected by switching
Phase detect is not widely available – on roadmaps
Meter Manufacturers Supported Residential – Varies by vendor
Commercial – Same as above
Distribution Automation Supported – varies slightly based on vendor and
field equipment manufacturer – DNP3
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Current Industry RF Offerings
40
Feature Supported RF (As an Industry)
Load Management Support Typically 2 & 3 relay devices available
Support for appliance runtime, control time, tamper
flags, etc.
Distributed Generation / Energy
Resources / EV Charging
Some vendors support communications to “smart”
invertors, but no full scale deployments yet
EV charging station support
Net metering supported
Street / Security Light Controls Supported by most vendors
Pre-paid Metering Supported
Home Area Network (HAN) Supported by most vendors*
Voltage “Instantaneous”, min/sag, max/swell, average
* Smart Phones have replaced the need for in-home displays
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
PLC vs. RFFeature Supported PLC RF Gap
Interval Data Options Residential – 2 Channels
Commercial – 4 Channels
Residential – 4 Channels
Commercial – 4 Channels
Moderate – RF offers more
data capacity and frequency
Interval Data Reporting Varies on reading schedule. Customizable - Default:
Res. @ 60 min
Com. @ 15 min
Moderate – RF offers
greater flexibility & custom
reporting intervals
Outage and Restoration Via ping request (checking
for a response)
Automatically via OMS or
other vendor features
Automatic – configurable
time and reporting
parameters
Moderate – outage and blink
count are enhanced by not
having to ping and interpret
return messages
Electrical Path / Phasing Electrical path/phase can be
determined.
Switching can cause missed
readings.
Reads not affected by
switching.
Phase detect is readily
currently available – select
vendors support it.
Low/Moderate – RF does
not read from substations.
Phase detect is not yet
available for some vendors.
Meter Manufacturers
Supported
Varies Varies Low – More and more
vendors supporting a diverse
meter manufacturer list
Distribution Automation Typically seen at cap banks,
slightly more limited.
Supported – varies slightly
based on DA vendor
equipment
Low – Private backhaul to a
critical DA device can be
more ideal
41
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
PLC vs. RFFeature Supported PLC RF Gap
Load Management
Support
Typically a 2 & 3 relay
device available
2 relay devices available
Support for appliance
runtime, control time,
tamper flags, etc.
4 relay in development
Low/Moderate – RF allows
for greater detail, expanded
data offering
Distributed Generation /
Energy Resources / EV
Charging
Net metering supported IPv6 changing supported
products
Net metering supported
Low – Both support sub and
net meters. There other RF
vendors further along in this
area
Street / Security Light
Controls
No support today
On the roadmap
Not Supported
On the roadmap
Moderate – RF vendors
currently have support
Pre-paid Metering Supported Supported Low – Supported by both.
RF offers slightly more
detail/data frequency
Home Area Network
(HAN)
No Support No Support Low – IOT has support by
other vendors – smartphones
changing the game more
Voltage “Instantaneous” “Instantaneous”, min/sag,
max/swell, average
Moderate – RF provides
more data reporting
capabilities
42
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
“And one more thing…”
• “I think if you do something and it turns out pretty good, then you should go do something else wonderful, not dwell on it for too long. Just figure out what's next.”
– Steve Jobs
43
© 2019 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Kyle Kopczyk
Manager of Utility Automation Consultant
Direct: 608-268-3539
Mobile: 810-923-3276
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.powersystem.orgThank you for your time.
44