Achieving Health Equity and Providing Quality Care
description
Transcript of Achieving Health Equity and Providing Quality Care
Achieving Health Equity and Providing Quality Care
Joseph R. Betancourt, M.D., M.P.H.Director, The Disparities Solutions Center
Senior Scientist, Institute for Health PolicyDirector for Multicultural Education, Massachusetts General Hospital
Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Outline
Disparities, Equity and Quality
Building the Foundation: Data Collection & Monitoring
Moving to Action: Improving Quality & Achieving Equity
Achieving Spread: The Disparities Leadership Program
Disparities, Equity and Quality
Diabetes-Related Death Rate, 2010Deaths per 100,000 population
22.8
50.1
33.6
50.3
18.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
WHITE BLACK HISP/LTN AI/AN ASIAN/PI
Disparities in Health Care 2002Racial/Ethnic disparities found across a wide range of health care settings, disease areas, and clinical services, even when various confounders (SES, insurance) controlled for.Many sources contribute to disparities—no one suspect, no one solution• System factors• Provider factors• Patient factors
IOM’s Unequal Treatmentwww.nap.edu
Recommendations Increase awareness of existence of disparities Address systems of care
– Support race/ethnicity data collection, quality improvement, use of EGB’s, multidisciplinary teams, community outreach
– Improve workforce diversity– Facilitate interpretation services
Provider education– Health Disparities, Cultural Competence, Clinical Decisionmaking
Patient education (navigation, activation) Research
– Promising strategies, Barriers to eliminating disparities
Quality Health Care Health care should be
– Safe
– Effective
– Patient-centered
– Timely
– Efficient
– Equitable
8
Linking Disparities to Cost, Quality and Safety Safe
– Minorities have more medical errors with greater clinical consequences
Effective– Minorities received less evidence-based care
(diabetes) Patient-centered
– Minorities less likely to provide truly informed consent; some have lower satisfaction
Timely– Minorities more likely to wait for same
procedure (transplant) Efficient
– Minorities experience more test ordering in ED due to poor communication
Equitable– No variation in outcomes
Also– Minorities have more CHF readmissions,
ACS admissions, and longer LOS
Cost of Disparities
Between 2003 and 2006, the combined direct and indirect cost of health disparities in the United States was $1.24 trillion (in 2008 inflation-adjusted dollars).
Building the Foundation:Data Collection and Monitoring
Achieving Equity
Key ProcessCollect Data
Identify and Report by R/E
Implement Solutions
Evaluate
Strategic Planning
MGH Disparities Committee 2003
Underlying Principle While data specific to disparities at MGH important, not
necessary to begin to take action given IOM Report documented issue nationally
Charge Identify and address disparities in health and health care
wherever they may exist at MGH– Subcommittees: Quality, Pt Experience, Education/Awareness– Present plan and results to Board, Executive Council and other
hospital leadership regularly
Data CollectionPerceived Challenges
Collection of information is illegal
Patients won’t want to provide information
Registrars won’t want to collect information
(have history of just deciding patient info)
Process will take too long, impede registration
Adapting IT systems to collect info costly
Uncertain how information will be used
Data Collection: TimelinePrior to 2003
Collected R/E data in 5 basic categories and
preferred language
Registrars asked basic questions
Little training or quality assurance
No preamble to collection of data
No campaign to inform patients of purpose
Information not linked to quality data
Data Collection: Timeline
2003 Boston Mayor convenes Hosp CEO’s & Community Leaders
– Agree to effort to address disparities in health and health care– Boston hospitals to be required to collect race/ethnicity
2004 Piloted new method of collection
– 3 models among 7000 patients (R/E, subgroup, language, education)– Metrics: Collects key info in timely fashion in way patients could
understand Registrars receive intense training and QA Process
– Includes preamble, methods to respond to questions City releases PR Poster Campaign MGH passes policy that all Quality Data will be stratified by
race/ethnicity and language
Data Collection: Timeline2006 MA Health Care Reform requires race/ethnicity, language,
and highest level of education to be collected MGH begins preparation of Disparities Dashboard
– Poster campaign series and website unveiled – Disparities questions incorporated in Quality Rounds– Patient Experience Survey Conducted– Multicultural Advisory Board Convened– Patient Satisfaction stratified by race/ethnicity, and language
2007 MGH develops first Disparities Dashboard Disparities found, interventions developed2008 MGH begins public reporting via web
Initial Disparities Dashboard Welcome and Purpose
– Definition of DisparitiesFocus on disparities in care
– Purpose of DashboardAnnual ReportEmbedded into Q and S Reporting
– Data and MeasurementHow race/ethnicity data collected
– Process, categoriesData Sources
– IDX, PATCOM, TSI, H-CAHPS survey data, medical record review (Core/NHQM)
Snapshot of diversity of MGH patients– Who they are and where they are seen
Initial Disparities Dashboard Measures
– Clinical quality indicatorsInpatient: National Hospital Core Measures
– AMI, CHF, CAP, SCIPOutpatient: HEDIS Measures
– Mammogram, Pap, CRC Screening– Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease
– Physician, Practice Linkage– Patient Experiences with Care
Press-Ganey Inpatient satisfaction by r/eResults of Quality RoundsResults of Minority Survey
– Communication with LEP patients
Disparities Dashboard Evolution
H-CAHPS Inpatient satisfaction by race/ethnicity All-cause and ACS Admission by race/ethnicity CHF Readmissions by race/ethnicity Sentinel Measures
– Mental Health– Pain Mgmt in the ED– Wait time for Renal Transplantation
New Minority Patient Experience Survey Interpreter Pilot Project Cross-Cultural Communication Training Report
Disparities Dashboard Executive Summary– Green Light: Areas where care is equitable
National Hospital Quality MeasuresHEDIS Outpatient Measures (Main Campus)Pain Mgmt in the ED
– Yellow Light: National disparities, areas to be exploredMental Health, Renal TransplantationAll cause and ACS Admissions (so far no disparities)CHF Readmissions (so far no disparities)Patient Experience (H-CAHPS shows subgroup variation)
– Red Light: Disparities found, action being takenDiabetes at community health centers
– Chelsea (Latino), Revere (Cambodian) Diabetes Project Colonoscopy screening rates
– Chelsea CRC Navigator Program (Latinos)
Moving to Action:Improving Quality and
Achieving Equity
Culturally Competent Disease Management:The MGH Chelsea Diabetes Program
Collaboration of the Disparities Solutions Center, Chelsea Healthcare Center, and the MGPO
A quality improvement / disparities reduction program with 3 primary components:
• Telephone outreach to increase rate of HbA1c testing
• Individual coaching to address patients’ needs and concerns regarding diabetes self-management to improve HbA1c
• Group education meeting ADA requirements
*Also focus on link between mental health, chronic disease management, and prevention
Diabetes Control Improving for All: Gap between Whites and Latinos Closing
24% 24%
20%
37%34%
29%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2007 2008 2009
Year
% o
f Pat
ient
s w
ith P
oorly
Con
trol
led
Dia
bete
s (H
bA1c
>
8) Whites
Latinos
* Chelsea Diabetes Management Program began in first quarter of 2007; in 2008 received Diabetes Coalition of MA Programs of Excellence Award
*
Chelsea CRC Navigator Program
CRC Navigator Program– Initiated 2005– Use of registry to identify individuals, by race/ethnicity,
who haven’t been screened for colon cancer– Navigator contacts patient (phone or live)– Determine key issues, assist in process
EducationExploration of cultural perspectivesLogistical issues (transportation, chaperone)
– GI Suite facilitates time/spaces issues
CRC Screening Over Time
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201025%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
Chelsea PatientsLatino White
Year
CR
C S
cree
ning
Com
plet
ion
(%)
Health Care Provider and Staff Training Quality Interactions Cross-Cultural Training offered as option as part of MGPO QI
Incentive in Q3 2009; case-based, evidence-based, interactive e-learning program which allows learners to develop a skill set to provide quality to patients of diverse cultural backgrounds
987 doctors completed; more than 88% said program increased awareness of issues, would improve care they provide to patients, and would recommend to colleagues; average pretest score 51%, posttest score 83%
Training 3000 frontline staff with Healthcare Professional Version
1. Available at: http://www.qualityinteractions.org/prod_overview/clinical_program_features.html.
New Initiative: Patient Experience Survey Goal:
– Gain additional insight into the experiences of diverse patients and harder-to-reach vulnerable populations
Methods: – 800 interviews, stratified by R/E, ambulatory, ED, and
inpatient (will include Peds, and possibly mult languages)– Self-administered paper survey and telephone follow-up
Instrument: – MGH 2004 Disparities Survey with modifications– Standard patient experience domains and disparities-
related issues, including experiences of perceived discrimination or unfair treatment
Preliminary results expected Fall 2012
*Funded by the MGH Center for Quality and Safety
New Initiative: Improving Safety in Patients with Limited-English Proficiency
Funded by Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Disparities Solutions Center in collaboration with Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge
Project Years: 2009-2012
Project Goals• A hospital guide on
preventing, identifying, and reporting medical errors due to language barriers and cross-cultural communication problems.
• A new TeamSTEPPS® training module, focused on team behaviors to improve safety in LEP and culturally diverse patient populations
MGH New LEP Safety Initiatives Interpreter Rounds
– Medical interpreters will conduct rounds to assess quality of care and patient experience of LEP patients
Executive Quality and Safety Rounds – Executive rounds will include manager of interpreter services
to incorporate focus on role of language and cultural factors
Training– Interpreter Training: Patient Safety 101, Reporting,
Communication Tools via TeamSTEPPS® LEP Module– Provider Training: E-Learning Program on partnering with
interpreter services and tools for working with interpreters
New Initiative: MGH Patient Activation Poster Campaign
Launched: June 2011
Languages: English and Spanish
Long Term Plans: Expand to other languages, ideally evaluate impact of poster campaign on patient-provider communication and error reduction
Achieving Spread:The Disparities
Leadership Program
The Disparities Leadership Program One year, Exec Q/S, Distance Learning Program Develop cadre of leaders in health care equipped with
– Knowledge of disparities, root causes, research-to-date– Cutting-edge QI strat’s for identifying/addressing disparities– Leadership skills to implement and transform organizations
Assist individuals and organizations to:– Create a strategic plan to address disparities, or– Advance or improve an ongoing project, and– Be prepared to meet new standards and regulations from
the JC, NCQA, and health care reform
Our Experience: The Disparities Leadership Program
• From 2007 to 2012 (5 Cohorts), the Disparities Leadership Program trained:• 190 participants from 86 organizations
• 43 hospitals• 16 health plans • 17 community health centers • 1 hospital trade organization• 1 federal government agency; 1 city government agency• 7 professional organizations
• Representation from 28 states, along with the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Switzerland
AIM Statement
We aim to improve the accuracy and collection rate from 81% to 95% for Race, Language, Ethnicity, Hispanic/Non-Hispanic, and Religious Preference (REAL Plus) data collection for UC Davis Health System within the next fiscal year (July 1, 2012 – June 30, 2013) and pre-work to begin in May 2012.
Project ScopeThe DLP Project Team assisted us in “scoping” our project in specifically on developing strategic plans to achieve the below indicated milestones:
Development of system-wide curriculum and ongoing training program for all staff with competencies in collection of REAL dataDesign of efficient infrastructure to measure patient experience outcomes with REAL Data Collection REAL Data using CG CAHPS Cultural Competence Survey Integration Ability to VALIDATE “accuracy” of collection of REAL Data with Coaching and Improvement Plan Implemented
Project Description
DISPARITIES LEADERSHIP PROGRAM 2012
Disparities Leadership Program 2012-2013
GoalThe goal of our project is to research and develop a disparities dashboard to identify and strategically address AnMed Health’s most vulnerable, underserved and costly patient populations. The disparities dashboard will be adjunct to our system-wide quality management strategies.
Project Objectives• Establish dashboard implementation team • Establish dashboard framework• Establish priority populations• System engagement• Project Evaluation & Phase II Assessment
National Hospital Quality Measures 1-White 1-Hispanic 2-Black 3-American Indian 4-Asian 7-UTD Total
Heart FailureDischarge instructions 97.34% 100.00% 96.52% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 97.16%Evaluation of LVS Function 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%ACEI or ARB for LVSD 99.33% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 99.50%Adult smoking cessation advice/counseling 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%HF Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 97.76% 0.00% 97.18% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 97.64%
AMIAspirin at arrival 99.56% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.64%
Aspirin Prescribed at discharge 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
ACEI or ARB for LVSD 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%Adult smoking cessation advice / Counseling 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Beta Blocker prescribed at Discharge 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Inpatient Mortality *Not tracked in 2011 2.63% 0.00% 3.57% 0.00% 2.80%
Primary PCI Received Within 90 Minutes of Hospital Arrival 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%AMI Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 99.58% 100.00% 98.21% 100.00% 99.32%AMI-T1a LDL Cholesterol Assessment 100.00% 0.00% 91.67% 0.00% 97.62%AMI-T2 Lipid-Lowering Therapy at Discharge (Test) 93.33% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 95.24%
PneumoniaPneumococcal vaccination 99.80% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.82%Blood Cultures Performed in the ED Prior to Initial Abx Received in Hospital 99.45% 100.00% 96.34% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.05%Adult smoking cessation advice / counseling 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Influenza vaccination 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%Blood cultures w/i 24 hours of hosp arrival-pts transferred/admitted to the ICU 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%Initial antibiotic received within 8 hours of hospital arrival 97.16% 100.00% 97.26% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 97.20%Initial antibiotic selection for CAP in immunocompetent - ICU patient 95.45% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 95.92%Initial antibiotic selection for CAP in immunocompetent - Non ICU patient 97.60% 100.00% 97.22% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 97.56%Initial Antibiotic Received Within 6 Hours of Hospital Arrival 97.16% 100.00% 97.26% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 97.20%PN Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 96.99% 100.00% 94.87% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 96.75%
Surgical CareProphylactic abx within 1 hr prior to surgical incision-Overall Rate 98.01% 100.00% 99.15% 0.00% 98.20%Prophylactic abx selection surgical patients-Overall Rate 98.48% 100.00% 99.16% 0.00% 98.60%Prophylactic abx discontinued within 24 hrs after surgery end time-Overall Rate 98.03% 100.00% 99.11% 0.00% 98.21%Cardiac Surgery Patients With Controlled 6 A.M. Postoperative Serum Glucose 99.19% 100.00% 93.75% 0.00% 98.58%Surgery Patients with Appropriate Hair Removal 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Surgery Pt on BB Therapy Received BB During Perioperative Period 97.25% 100.00% 95.24% 100.00% 96.97%Surgery Patients with Recommended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Ordered 98.60% 100.00% 98.89% 0.00% 98.66%Rcvd Appropriate VTE Prophylaxis w/n 24 Hrs Prior to thru 24 hrs after Surg 97.66% 100.00% 96.67% 0.00% 97.51%SCIP Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 91.93% 100.00% 91.25% 100.00% 91.89%Urinary Catheter Removed on POD 1 or POD 2 With Day of Surgery Being Day Zero 93.84% 100.00% 94.12% 0.00% 93.95%Surgery Patients with Perioperative Temperature Management 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
National Hospital Quality Measures 1-White 1-Hispanic 2-Black 3-American Indian 4-Asian 7-UTD Total
Heart FailureDischarge instructions 97.34% 100.00% 96.52% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 97.16%Evaluation of LVS Function 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%ACEI or ARB for LVSD 99.33% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 99.50%Adult smoking cessation advice/counseling 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%HF Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 97.76% 0.00% 97.18% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 97.64%
AMIAspirin at arrival 99.56% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.64%
Aspirin Prescribed at discharge 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
ACEI or ARB for LVSD 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%Adult smoking cessation advice / Counseling 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Beta Blocker prescribed at Discharge 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Inpatient Mortality *Not tracked in 2011 2.63% 0.00% 3.57% 0.00% 2.80%
Primary PCI Received Within 90 Minutes of Hospital Arrival 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%AMI Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 99.58% 100.00% 98.21% 100.00% 99.32%AMI-T1a LDL Cholesterol Assessment 100.00% 0.00% 91.67% 0.00% 97.62%AMI-T2 Lipid-Lowering Therapy at Discharge (Test) 93.33% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 95.24%
PneumoniaPneumococcal vaccination 99.80% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.82%Blood Cultures Performed in the ED Prior to Initial Abx Received in Hospital 99.45% 100.00% 96.34% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.05%Adult smoking cessation advice / counseling 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Influenza vaccination 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%Blood cultures w/i 24 hours of hosp arrival-pts transferred/admitted to the ICU 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%Initial antibiotic received within 8 hours of hospital arrival 97.16% 100.00% 97.26% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 97.20%Initial antibiotic selection for CAP in immunocompetent - ICU patient 95.45% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 95.92%Initial antibiotic selection for CAP in immunocompetent - Non ICU patient 97.60% 100.00% 97.22% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 97.56%Initial Antibiotic Received Within 6 Hours of Hospital Arrival 97.16% 100.00% 97.26% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 97.20%PN Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 96.99% 100.00% 94.87% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 96.75%
Surgical CareProphylactic abx within 1 hr prior to surgical incision-Overall Rate 98.01% 100.00% 99.15% 0.00% 98.20%Prophylactic abx selection surgical patients-Overall Rate 98.48% 100.00% 99.16% 0.00% 98.60%Prophylactic abx discontinued within 24 hrs after surgery end time-Overall Rate 98.03% 100.00% 99.11% 0.00% 98.21%Cardiac Surgery Patients With Controlled 6 A.M. Postoperative Serum Glucose 99.19% 100.00% 93.75% 0.00% 98.58%Surgery Patients with Appropriate Hair Removal 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Surgery Pt on BB Therapy Received BB During Perioperative Period 97.25% 100.00% 95.24% 100.00% 96.97%Surgery Patients with Recommended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Ordered 98.60% 100.00% 98.89% 0.00% 98.66%Rcvd Appropriate VTE Prophylaxis w/n 24 Hrs Prior to thru 24 hrs after Surg 97.66% 100.00% 96.67% 0.00% 97.51%SCIP Appropriate Care Score (ACS) 91.93% 100.00% 91.25% 100.00% 91.89%Urinary Catheter Removed on POD 1 or POD 2 With Day of Surgery Being Day Zero 93.84% 100.00% 94.12% 0.00% 93.95%Surgery Patients with Perioperative Temperature Management 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Appropriate Care Scores
Alameda County Medical Center
Measuring Equity: Lessons Learned
Annette Johnson, MBA Quality Analyst
Alameda County Medical Center
“To measure is to know”…“If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it”Lord Kelvin, William Thompson, 1824-1907
Alameda County Medical Center
GraphData for Visual Impact
Eliminate Excessive Nuance Highlight
Asks and Actions
Anatomy of a Dashboard
Alameda County Medical Center
Balance What is
Measured Aim for quick wins
Highlight Bright Spots
Dashboard Strategies
Summary
There is a significant body of evidence that has identified
racial/ethnic disparities in health care, and impact on cost,
quality and safety
Hospitals can play a major role in their elimination through
quality improvement
– Essential elements include data collection, monitoring, quality
improvement, provider and patient interventions
Efforts to improve quality and achieve equity will improve the
care not only of minorities, but of all patients
Thank You
Joseph R. Betancourt, MD, MPH
www.mghdisparitiessolutions.org
www.qualityinteractions.org