ACE Accreditation Process for Cardiac Catheterization Labs Kelly Cross, RN SUNYIT November 22, 2013.
-
Upload
jemima-foster -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of ACE Accreditation Process for Cardiac Catheterization Labs Kelly Cross, RN SUNYIT November 22, 2013.
ACE Accreditation Process for Cardiac Catheterization Labs
Kelly Cross, RN
SUNYIT
November 22, 2013
What is accreditation?
ACE- Accreditation for Cardiovascular Excellence
An approach intended to improve quality outcomes.
ACE process is an internal gap analysis and an external review of all processes that impact this particular distribution of patients.
It is a structured template of evidenced based metrics your facility is measured against to become accredited.
Background…why do this?
Accountability to state regulating bodies to demonstrate quality measures in place; e.g. Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC)
Demonstrate to community and administration the quality commitment and process of care
Interventional cardiology is under a spotlight due to inappropriate use of stents in various states; Maryland, Texas, Pennsylvania to name a few.
Benefits
Future of healthcare is lean based, quality driven excellence from multidisciplinary team.
Value based purchasing will effect your facility
Benefits
ValidationAppropriate patient selectionQuality careInternal peer processes
Reduced costsIndependent state reviews with no finesInsurance coverageIncreased patient satisfaction
Benefits
Enhanced:Facility reputationProgram reputationPhysician reputationStaff and Physician moraleBrand recognition and community
support
Concerns….
Was your stent unnecessary?
Highly litigious industry with lawyers seeking out patients for financial gain.
Loss of trust
physicians, healthcare, pharmaceutical industries
Loss of revenue
patients can sue if deemed inappropriate use, lost wages, payer challenges, loss of referrals.
Increased costs
legal fees, insurance reviews, media coverage
Concerns…..
Public ReportingMultiple public sitesIncreased pressure to report
American College of Cardiology (ACC) statistics to other regulating bodies that effect revenue
Affordable Care ActAppropriate Use Criteria (AUC)
A comprehensive look at everything !
Policies
Competencies
Documentation
Facility
Equipment
Leadership structure
Staff (Nurses,CVT’s,RT’s)
Quality/Peer Review/Cath Conference Standards
Radiation Safety
Outcomes
Procedure indication, consents, preparation and code of conduct
Road to Accreditation
Initial Application reviewed by nurses, physicians and quality experts, to include:Outcome MeasuresPolicies and ProceduresQuality ReviewsInternal peer review processDemographics, AUC, standard quality
metrics
Road To Accreditation
Nurse Site Visit:Validation of all date entered into the
National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)
Process and facility reviewMedical records auditsCritical review of every procedure done
over past 2 years
Road to Accreditation
Physician Date and Angiographic ReviewPhysician site visitDeficiencies and corrective action
plansRoot Cause Analysis
• Recommendation may be Provisional, Accredited or Denied
Submission Process
10 cases per performing physicianHospital notes, office notes, previous cath
reports, lab results, supportive non-invasive testing
Data transferred into data metrics spreadsheet from ACE.
All characteristics met ACE standardsPartially Met standardNot Meeting standardMet standard
What did we learn ?
Site Not yet reviewed.Application in process
Expectations are well above what is currently documented
Policies and Protocols are deficientOpportunities identified to improve
physician oversight
What did we learn ?
Non-invasive documentation needs to be fortified.
Physician reporting not standardizedMedical staff policies are not enforced
Next Steps
Ongoing processes to standardize policies and procedures and protocols.
Quality oversight for physicians to reinforce medical staff policies
Institute culture that embraces ACE accreditation standards
Educate the staff
References
ACE accreditation for Cardiovascular Excellence. (2013). Retrieved online on 11/22/13 from
http://www.cvexcel.org/Default.aspx
Medical Malpractice lawyers. (2013). Maryland case settled. Retrieved online on
11/23/13 from https://www.medicalmalpracticelawyers.com/blog/tag/
unnecessary-stent-claim/
National Cardiovascular Database registry. (2013). Retrieved online on 11/22/13
from https://www.ncdr.com/WebNCDR/