ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.
-
Upload
aubrey-stevens -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.
![Page 1: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ACCREDITATION
FOR
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT
Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP
![Page 2: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Accreditation in Relation to Organization Development
![Page 3: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Goal of Organization Development
O.D. – is a field of behavioral science related to planned changed.
Change to become a better organization – is the goal of Organization Development.
![Page 4: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Indicators of “Change for the Better”
Quality productEfficient utilization of resourcesDelivery of servicesInter personal relationshipsMethods and processWorking EnvironmentProfitBetter Name
![Page 5: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Tools for Organizational Development Internal:
– Planning and Re-planning– Re-organization– Consultations– Results from internal evaluation– Consistent and Strict implementation– Incentives
Legal Para-Legal– Rules and Regulations– Laws– Standards
External– External Evaluation– Bench Marking– Incentives (Funding, recognitions)– Accreditation
![Page 6: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Concepts Behind Accreditation
![Page 7: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Accreditation Bodies
– These are organizations of institutions of the same nature.
– Government recognition is not necessary
– Guardians of standards and quality.
– Members voluntarily bonding themselves to abide with the standards set by the organization
– Neutral and Objective.
![Page 8: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Types of Accreditation Body
National or International
Government or Non-Government
Organization
For Business Establishments
Educational Institutions
![Page 9: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
![Page 10: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Some Info about ISOKeeping and Developing Standards in almost
all areas of technical, industrial and business establishments.
They have procedures and technical supports on how to meet the standards.
Very Popular ISO Standards– IS0 9000 – Quality Management– ISO 1600 – Environmental Management
Each Country have 1 member organization that could give ISO Certification – In the Philippines it is the Bureau of Product Standard under DTI.
![Page 11: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Accreditation of Educational Institution
![Page 12: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Concept of School Accreditation
A concept based on self-regulation which focuses on evaluation and the continuing improvement of educational quality.
Voluntary Submission of educational Institution for assessment, evaluation by a team of Inspectors from similarly-situated schools.
a process by which institutions or programs continuously upgrade their educational quality and services through self-evaluation and the judgment of peers.
a status granted to an educational institution or program which meets commonly accepted standards of quality or excellence. The purpose is not to junk or close the school but help to point out the strengths and weaknesses of the system in order to effectively address the causes of poor quality.
![Page 13: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Basic Characteristics of Accreditation
its prevailing sense of volunteerism;
its strong tradition of self-regulation;
its reliance on evaluation techniques;
its primary concern with quality.
![Page 14: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Why Private, Voluntary AccreditationIn general, all educational institutions in
the Philippines go through one form of Accreditation – “recognition by the government”. Government recognition is, however, inadequate for purposes of identifying and determining educational quality. Thus, private voluntary Accreditation provides the opportunity for an educational institution to attain standards above those prescribed as minimum requirements by the government.
![Page 15: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Post Graduate
Graduate
Undergraduate
Technical Vocational
Courses (1 to 3 years)
Secondary
Elementary (Compulsory)
Pre-School (Optional)
Formal
Philippine Education System
Formal
BA
SIC
ED
UC
AT
ION
PO
ST
-SE
CO
ND
AR
Y E
DU
CA
TIO
N
Commission onHigher Education
![Page 16: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Higher Education System
Commission on Higher Education (CHED)
Republic Act No. 7722 – the trifocalization of education in 1994
System governance over public and private higher educational institutions (HEI’s)
Oversees degree-granting programs and implements policies and standards
![Page 17: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Enrolment in Higher Education (AY 2002-2003)
2.4Million
815,910Public
1,605,924Private
1,100,048Non-Sectarian
505,876Sectarian
734,539SUC’s
74,382LUC’s
6,989Other Government
Schools
45% 21%
66%
34%
30% 3% 1%
![Page 18: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1,479Total
174Public
1,305Private
980Non-Sectarian
325Sectarian
111SUC’s
44LUC’s
Institutions of Higher Education (AY 2002-2003)
66% 22%
88%
12%
8% 3%
19Other Government
Schools
1%
![Page 19: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Private higher education system preceded the public system
University of San Carlos 1595 University of Santo Tomas 1611 Colegio de San Juan de Letran 1620 Colegio de Santa Isabel 1632 Colegio de Santa Catalina 1696 Ateneo de Manila University 1804 Superior Normal School for Women Teachers 1893
Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines (CEAP) Founded in 1941 Formed the pillars of the Philippine Accrediting Association of
Schools, Colleges and Universities (PAASCU)
PAASCU Founded in 1957 by 11 Catholic educational institutions Mainly for Catholic schools, but not restrictive
Accreditation Bodies
![Page 20: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Non-Catholic religious institutions
Presbyterian (Silliman University) 1901 Baptist (Central Philippine University) 1905 Adventist (Adventist University of the Philippines) 1917
Association of Christian Schools, Colleges and Universities (ACSCU)
Founded in 1946 Formed the of the Association of Christian Schools, Colleges
and Universities Accrediting Agency (ACSCU-AA) in 1976
ACSCU-AA Mainly for non-Catholic schools, but not restrictive
Accreditation Bodies
![Page 21: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Early private non-sectarian institutions National University 1900 University of Manila 1913 Jose Rizal University 1919 Philippine Women’s University 1919 Mapua Institute of Technology 1925 Far Eastern University 1928
Philippine Association Colleges and Universities (PACU) Founded in 1950 Formed the Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities
Commission on Accreditation (PACUCOA) in 1973
PACUCOA Mainly for proprietary non-sectarian schools, but not restrictive
Accreditation Bodies
![Page 22: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
State/Public higher education system
Philippine Normal University 1901 Technological University of the Philippines 1901 Polytechnic University of the Philippines 1904 University of the Philippines 1908
Philippine Association of State Universities and Colleges (PASUC)
Founded in 1967 Formed the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities of the Philippines (AACCUP) in 1987
AACCUP Formed in 1987 as the State Colleges and Universities Accrediting Agency of the Philippines (SCUAAP) Changed to AACCUP in 1989 Became a member of FAAP in 1995, resigned in 2000
Accreditation Bodies
![Page 23: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Federation of Accrediting Agencies of the Philippines (FAAP)
PAASCU ACSCU-AA PACUCOA AACCUP
Membership as of AY 2002-2003:
89 21 62 ---
Personality:
Catholic Sectarian
Protestant Sectarian
Private Non-Sectarian Public
Number of HEI’s in AY 2002-2003:
980325 174
Number of HEI’s not accredited:
918918 ------215215
![Page 24: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and Universities. (PAASCU)
![Page 25: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
What is PAASCU It is private, voluntary, non-profit and non-stock
corporation which was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 1957.
PAASCU is a service organization which accredits academic programs which meet commonly accepted standards of quality education.
In November 1967, the Bureau of Education and Culture (now the Department of Education, Culture and Sports) officially recognized PAASCU and endorsed its work as an accrediting agency.
![Page 26: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What are its Objectives? To stimulate and integrate the efforts of institutions to elevate the
standards of education in the Philippines, in both rural and urban areas.
To strengthen the capabilities of the educational institutions for service to the nation.
To identify educational institutions which meet or exceed stated criteria of educational quality.
To encourage and assist institutions which have the potential and interest to improve themselves through continuing evaluation and self-surveys.
To provide counsel and assistance to established and developing institutions and programs.
To provide a basis for institutional relationships, particularly in the transfer of students.
To provide guidance to students and parents in the choice of institutions and programs.
To attract financial aid from government and other sources for accredited programs and schools applying for Accreditation.
![Page 27: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What are PAASCU'S Standards?
The Association does not impose arbitrary standards. The survey forms developed by PAASCU identify
principles and practices which are found in excellent institutions. The statements in the survey forms are more qualitative rather than quantitative. The Association does not have specific formulas to apply or particular patterns of organization to follow. The criteria and survey instruments are merely tools to help the school measure educational quality. They are intended to serve as a guide for institutions as they strive for excellence and for accreditors as they assess institutional achievement.
The standards reflect a realistic appraisal of the school's resources and their efficient utilization to help the institution achieve its goals.
![Page 28: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
How are these standards measured?
Much emphasis is placed on the formulation of the school's purposes and objectives. Only when its goals are clear can the school discover the extent to which such purposes and objectives are being achieved.
Essential in the Accreditation process is the self-survey made by an institution applying for Accreditation. The self-survey is an analysis by its own staff of the institution's educational resources and effectiveness in relation to its own purposes and objectives.
PAASCU judges an institution not by comparison with other institutions but primarily by the degree to which each institution's own avowed purposes are matched by actual practice in the various areas being evaluated. Thus, a school is judged on the basis of the “total pattern” presented by it.
![Page 29: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Areas Evaluated During The Survey
During the survey visits, the following areas are evaluated:
1. College/School Community Involvement 2. Faculty 3. Instruction 4. Library 5. Laboratories 6. Physical Plant 7. Student Services 8. Administration 9. On the grade school level, the area on
laboratories (No. 5 above) is omitted; instead, Student Activity Program is added.
![Page 30: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
What is the difference between program Accreditation and institutional Accreditation?
“Program Accreditation” refers to the Accreditation of academic courses such as liberal arts, sciences, education, commerce, etc. PAASCU's policy extends Accreditation by program. This means that individual courses of study, such as liberal arts, sciences, commerce, and education are evaluated by PAASCU and given proper Accreditation.
In contrast, “institutional Accreditation” refers to the Accreditation of the school, college or institution as a whole. Under PAASCU policy, institutional Accreditation is not undertaken by itself; only individual programs are accredited. Only when all the programs of an institution are accredited may that particular institution be considered an accredited institution under PAASCU policy.
PAASCU Accreditation of a high school and a grade school is considered Program Accreditation.
![Page 31: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Which programs are accredited by PAASCU? On the college level, PAASCU accredits courses or programs in: Liberal Arts/Sciences Education Commerce Nursing Engineering Agriculture Accountancy Social Work Medical Technology Computer Science Pharmacy Radiologic Technology Physical/Occupational Therapy Interior Design/Fine Arts Architecture Hotel and Restaurant Management Agribusiness PAASCU began Accreditation of secondary schools in 1965. The Accreditation of
elementary schools was started in 1971. Graduate school Accreditation began 1988.
![Page 32: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
What are the categories of membership in PAASCU?
The Accreditation process consists of several stages. Each one identified with a particular status of the institution applying for membership. Each of these stages has certain requirements and qualifications which are described in detail on pages 10-13 of this primer. The first category is applicant status, followed by candidate status, and followed finally by member status.
![Page 33: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Classification Of Educational Institutions By DECS?
For purposes of progressive deregulation and the grant of other benefits, CHED Order No. 31 s. 1995 (Policies on Voluntary Accreditation in Aid of Quality and Excellence in Higher Education) classifies educational programs into:
Level I: Applicant Status – “Institutions/programs which have undergone a preliminary survey visit and are capable of attaining accredited status within one or two years.”
Level II: Accredited Status – “Institutions/programs which have undergone formal Accreditation and have been granted initial Accreditation set by FAAP for this level.”
Level III: Re-accredited Status – “Institutions/programs which have been accredited and which have met the additional criteria set by FAAP for this level.”
Level IV: Re-accredited Status – “Institutions/programs which have distinguished themselves in a broad area of academic discipline and enjoy prestige and authority comparable to that of international universities.”
![Page 34: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Benefits and incentives
Level Ia.1) Partial Administrative Deregulation
Exemption from compliance with prescribed administrative operational requirements, such as need for approval of class and teacher's programs, trimestral submission of enrolment lists, and reports of promotion of students. Form IX may also be submitted without the previously required documents and authority to grant teaching overload in meritorious cases.
![Page 35: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Benefits and IncentivesLevel II
b.1) Full administrative deregulation, provided that reports of promotion of students and lists of graduates are available for review by CHED at all times.
b.2) Financial deregulation in terms of setting of tuition and other school fees and charges.
b.3) Partial curricular autonomy which shall include the authority to revise the curricula without CHED approval provided that CHED and Professional Regulation Commission minimum requirements and guidelines, where applicable, are complied with and the revised curriculum is submitted to CHED Regional Offices.
b.4) Authority to graduate students from accredited courses or programs of study in the levels accredited without prior approval of the CHED and without need for Special Orders.
b.5) Priority in terms of available funding assistance for scholarships, library materials, laboratory equipment and other development activities.
b.6) Priority for government subsidy for faculty development.
b.7) Right use on its publications or advertisements the word “ACCREDITED” pursuant to CHED policies and rules.
b.8) Limited visitation, inspection and/or supervision by CHED supervisory personnel or representatives.
![Page 36: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Benefits and incentives
Level IIIc.1) All the benefits for Level II.
c.2) Full curricular deregulation, including the authority to offer new courses allied to existing Level III courses, without need for prior approval provided that CHED, through the appropriate Higher Education Regional Office (HERO), is duly informed before offering such new programs.
![Page 37: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Benefits and incentives
Level IVd.1) All the benefits for Level II and Level III.
d.2) Awards of grants/subsidies from the Higher Education Development Fund for programs of qualified tertiary educational institutions for the period or duration of its Level IV accredited status, as approved by the CHED, in accordance with the HEDF Guidelines.
d.3) Grant of charter or full autonomy for the duration of its Level IV accredited status of the institution.
![Page 38: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Other Advantages
Membership in PAASCU:
Gives the institution and its faculty a sense of direction based on a clearer self-image.
Facilities transfer of students. Provides guidance for parents and students in
the choice of worthy schools.
Lends prestige for member schools, justified by the possession of quality standards and the unremitting effort to maintain them at a high level.
![Page 39: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Member Schools Are Entitled To The Following Services
Consultancy services: PAASCU makes available to institutions its Accreditation consultancy services to assist them in their institutional self-survey process and in their preparation for survey visits.
Complementary assistance to institutional programs:
Complementing the institution's own efforts at upgrading academic standards and in-service for administrative personnel, PAASCU organizes various training seminars, workshops and conferences in such areas as Instruction, Library Services, Student Personnel Services, Administration, College and Community Involvement.
Liaison and cooperation with the Department of Education,
Culture and Sports and the Commission on Higher Education: PAASCU seeks to assist members in identifying areas of liaison and cooperation with DECS and CHED regional offices.
![Page 40: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Accreditation Process Applicant Status
An educational institution committed to institutional self-improvement through the guidance of PAASCU may request to become an Applicant Institution.
Requirements Application letter from the President or Director of the
Institution, addressed to the PAASCU Board of Directors. DECS/CHED certificate of recognition Submission of the documents supporting the
institution's case for acceptance should include the institution's objectives, history, organizational structure and by-laws, principal administrators, number of faculty members, number of students, and any other materials/brochures/manuals/publications.
Payment of an application fee.
![Page 41: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Accreditation Process: Applicant StatusTerms and Conditions Application status is granted for a maximum period of
three (3) years, except when extended by specification of the Board of Directors.
Written Annual Progress Report, briefly outlining the progress of the institution in specific areas, is due on or before the first week of May.
PAASCU's Actions and Responsibilities Formal acceptance as an Applicant Institution. Assistance through School Improvement program and
Consultancy Services. Review of the Annual Progress Report by the
Commission concerned (Graduate School, Higher Education, Secondary Education or Elementary Education.)
![Page 42: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Accreditation Process: Candidate Status The candidate status is granted to institutions which
have completed their preliminary surveys and are preparing for initial Accreditation. Candidacy is not Accreditation and does not assure eventual Accreditation. It is an indication that an institution is progressing toward Accreditation.
Requirements Completion of a preliminary survey. Implementation of the recommendations of the
preliminary survey team. Completion of an Institutional Self-Survey using PAASCU
survey forms. Submission of the accomplished Self-Survey at least one
(1) month prior to the Formal Survey Visit.
![Page 43: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Accreditation Process: Candidate StatusTerms and ConditionsCandidate status is granted by the Board of
Directors until such time that the institution meets the requirements of a Member Institution.
The institution should implement the recommendations of the preliminary survey teams.
PAASCU's Actions and ResponsibilitiesConsultancy services, particularly during the
Institutional Self-Survey process, are made available.
Scheduling of a Formal Survey Visit upon Request of the institution.
![Page 44: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Accreditation ProcessMember Status
A Candidate Institution which has fulfilled the requirements of Accreditation may be granted Member status.
RequirementsThe Institution should receive a favorable rating
during a Formal Survey Visit conducted by a PAASCU Accrediting Team.
The Institution should strive to implement the recommendations of the Formal Survey Team.
Payment of the membership fee.
![Page 45: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Accreditation ProcessMember StatusTerms and Conditions Favorable evaluation by a PAASCU Formal Team leads to the
granting of Accreditation for a period of three (3) years. With this, the institution becomes a full member of the Association. At the end of the initial three-year Accreditation period, the school undergoes another self-evaluation. It then applies for re–Accreditation. If the second formal visit is favorable, then Accreditation is awarded for a period of five years.
PAASCU's Actions and Responsibilities Consultancy services to strengthen the areas needing
improvement. Assistance through school improvement program and services. Continued liaison with the Department of Education, Culture
and Sports and the Commission on Higher Education.
![Page 46: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
ACSCU-AA
![Page 47: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Accreditation Process ACSCU-AA
![Page 48: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Accreditation Process AACCUP
![Page 49: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Level I Level I Applicant StatusApplicant Status
Level II Level II Formal Applicant StatusFormal Applicant Status
Within 2 Within 2 yearsyears
Level II Level II First Re-accredited StatusFirst Re-accredited Status
3 years3 years
Level II Level II 22ndnd Re-accredited Status Re-accredited Status
5 years5 years
Level II Level II 33rdrd Re-accredited Status Re-accredited Status
5 years5 years
Level III Level III Accredited StatusAccredited Status
6 months6 months
CRITERIA (LEVEL I and II)CRITERIA (LEVEL I and II)
1.1. Purposes and ObjectivesPurposes and Objectives
2.2. FacultyFaculty
3.3. InstructionInstruction
4.4. LibraryLibrary
5.5. LaboratoryLaboratory
6.6. Physical Plant and FacilitiesPhysical Plant and Facilities
7.7. Student Personnel ServicesStudent Personnel Services
8.8. Social Orientation and Social Orientation and Community InvolvementCommunity Involvement
9.9. Organization and AdministrationOrganization and Administration
CRITERIA (LEVEL III)CRITERIA (LEVEL III)
1.1. Standard of InstructionStandard of Instruction
2.2. Community OutreachCommunity Outreach
3.3. ResearchResearch
4.4. Faculty and Staff DevelopmentFaculty and Staff Development
5.5. Licensure Exam PerformanceLicensure Exam Performance
6.6. LinkagesLinkages
7.7. Quality ImprovementQuality Improvement
Accreditation Process (PACUCOA)
![Page 50: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Prevailing Issues Unacceptable passing rate in licensure examinations Gap between programme outcomes and industry requirements Dichotomy of private-public educational standards Plurality of accreditation bodies and diversity of criteria,
vis-à-vis non-participation in voluntary evaluation by most HEI’s
A new Framework for quality assurance CHED’s proposal for the Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher
Education Institutions (HEI’s) Concerned with “outcomes-based” evaluation and effectiveness
of inputs and processes A holistic context in the education labor market equation
Global, regional, national Covering all HEI’s
Recent Movements in Philippine Higher Education System
![Page 51: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Frame of reference for outcomes-based evaluation Self-imposed standard of quality (mission-vision oriented) National educational benchmarks (CHED; Centers of Excellence) Professional and accreditation body requirements (i.e. ISO; FAAP) Employment and industry expectations (i.e. SEIPI) International educational benchmarks (i.e. Washington Accord)
Key Result Areas (KRA’s) for the new framework Quality of teaching and research Support for students Relations with the community Management of resources
Allocating HEI’s into categories M (r) – mature, full-function institutions M (t) – mature teaching institutions D – developing institutions O – other institutions
A New Framework
![Page 52: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
KRA 1: Quality of teaching and research Setting and achieving programme standards (CORE INDICATOR) Centers of Excellence and Centers of Development Research capability
KRA 2: Support for students Student scholarships (CORE) Equity and access (CORE) Foreign students
KRA 3: Relations with the community Relevance of programmes (CORE) Networking and linkages Community extension programs
KRA 4: Management of resources Faculty profile (CORE) Use of information and communications technology (CORE) Income generation (CORE)
Indicators of Quality
![Page 53: ACCREDITATION FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT Engr. Ronilo S. Saguit, MAURP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649e045503460f94af0aaa/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
M (r) Mature, full-function institutions Undertake the full range of functions, including research Normally evaluated against ALL of the indicators Score of at least “B” in 75% of the indicators, with no “D” score Score of at least “B” in the “Research Capability” indicator
M (t) Mature teaching institutions Teaching as core business, not normally undertaking research Normally evaluated against CORE plus other relevant indicators At least “B” in 75% of assigned indicators, with no “D” score
D Developing institutions Institutions with potential to be an “M (t)” category in the future Normally evaluated against ONLY CORE indicators Must have either Level II accredited programmes or 50%+ pass rate across all licensure examinations
O Other institutions Institutions not yet attaining “Developing Institution” status
Category Determinants