Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
-
Upload
kazuyano-doni -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
1/31
Group 9
Bagaskara satrio
Doni rahmad
Facriza mizafin
The Conceptual Framework of
Accounting
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
2/31
p
There are three relevant theories
regarding accounting and auditingactivities that can help to answer
why the company (manager) must
disclose the information in the form
of company financial statements.
The three theories are:
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
3/31
Theory of efficient markets
The forces of supply and demand influence
market behaviour and help keep markets
efficient
This applies to the market for accounting
information and should determine what
accounting data should be supplied and what
accounting practices should be used to prepareit
3
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
4/31
Theory of efficient markets
The market for accounting data is not efficient
The free-rider problem distorts the market
Users cannot agree on what they want Accountants cannot agree on procedures
Firms must produce comparable data
The government must therefore intervene
4
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
5/31
Agency theory
The demand for accounting information: for stewardship purposes
for decision-making purposes
A framework in which to study the relationshipbetween those who provide accounting
information - e.g. a manager - and those who
use ite.g. a shareholder or creditor
5
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
6/31
Agency theory
Because of imbalances between data suppliers
and data users, uncertainty and risk exist
Resources and risk are likely to be mis-
allocated between the parties
To the extent the market mechanism is
inefficient, accounting regulation is required to
reduce inefficient and inequitable outcomes
6
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
7/31
Theories of regulation
There are three theories of regulation:
public interest theory
regulatory capture theory
private interest theory
7
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
8/31
Public interest theory
Government regulation is required in the
public interest whenever there is market
failure (inefficiency) due to:
lack of competition
barriers to entry
information asymmetry
public-good products
8
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
9/31
Public interest theory
Governments intervene:
to get votes
because public interest groups demand
intervention
because they are neutral arbiters
9
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
10/31
Regulatory capture theory
The public interest is not protected because
those being regulated come to control or
dominate the regulator
The regulated protect or increase their wealth
Assumes the regulator has no independent role
to play but is simply an arbiter between
battling interest groups
10
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
11/31
Regulatory capture theory
Professional accounting bodies or the
corporate sector seek to control the setting of
accounting standards
11
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
12/31
Private interest theory
Governments are not independent arbiters, but
are rationally self-interested
They seek re-election
They will sell their power to coerce or
transfer wealth to those most likely to achieve
their re-election (if they are elected officials)
or increase their wealth (if they are appointed
officials) or both
12
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
13/31
How to applicate them?
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
14/31
Application of public interest theory
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (US, 2002)
Accounting Standards Review Board (AUS,
1984)
But:
Managers have incentives to voluntarily correctmarket failure perceptions about their firms
14
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
15/31
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
16/31
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
17/31
Standard setting as a political
process
Standard setting is a political process because
it can affect many conflicting and self-
interested groups
The regulator must make a political choice
The regulator must have a mandate to make
social choices
The recognition of doubtful debts can affect
entities differently
17
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
18/31
No. 5 Recognition and Measurement in
Financial Statements of Business
Enterprises Sets forth recognition criteria and
guidance on what information should be incorporated intofinancial statements and when this information should be
reported Defined comprehensive income as:Revenues Earnings
Less: Expenses Plus or minus cumulative
accounting adjustmentsPlus: Gains Plus or minus other
non-owner changes in equity
Less: Losses
= Earnings = Comprehensive Income
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
19/31
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
20/31
No. 6 The Elements of Financial
Statements
Defines the ten elements of financial
statements that are used to measure the
performance and position of economicentities
These elements are discussed
in more depth in Chapters 6and 7.
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
21/31
How should present value amortizations be used when the estimates ofcash flows change?
How should the estimates of cash flows and interest rates bedeveloped?
Does the measurement of liabilities at present value differ from themeasurement of assets?
SFAC No. 7 Using Cash Flow Information
and Present Value in Accounting
Measurements
Accounting measurement is a very broad topic. Consequently, the FASB focused on a series of questions relevant to measurement
and amortization conventions that employ present value techniques. Among thesequestions are:
What are the objectives of using present value in the initial recognition ofassets and liabilities? And, do these objectives differ in subsequentfresh-start measurements of assets and liabilities?
What are the objectives of present value when used in conjunction withthe amortization of assets and liabilities?
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
22/31
Present value measurements that fully captures theeconomic differences between assets should include the
following elements:
SFAC No. 7 Using Cash Flow Information and
Present Value in Accounting Measurements
1. An estimate of the future cash flows
2. Expectations about variations in the timing of those cash flows
3. The time value of money represented by the risk-free rate of interest
4. The price for bearing the uncertainty
5. Other, sometimes unidentifiable, factors including illiquidity andmarket imperfections
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
23/31
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
24/31
Principles Based vs. Rules BasedAccounting Standards
Continuum ranging from
highly rigid standardson one end
to general definitions of economics-based concepts on thother end.
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
25/31
Previous practice: Goodwill is to be amortized over a 40 life until it is fully amortized.
Example: Goodwill
New FASB rule: Goodwill is not amortized.
Any recorded goodwill is to be tested for impairment and writtendown to its current fair value on an annual basis.
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
26/31
FASB Questions
1. Do you support the Boards proposal for a principles-based approach to U. S. standard setting?Will that approach improve the quality and transparency of U. S. financial accounting and reporting?
2. Should the Board develop an overall reporting framework as in IAS 1?If so, should that framework include a true and fair override?
3. Under what circumstances should interpretive and implementation guidance be provided under aprinciples-based approach to U.S. standard setting?
Should the Board be the primary standard setter responsible for providing that guidance?
4. Will preparers, auditors, the SEC, investors, creditors, and other users of financial information beable to adjust to a principles-based approach to U.S. standard setting?
If not, what needs to be done and by whom?
5. What other factors should the Board consider in assessing the extent to which it should adopt aprinciples-based approach to U.S. standard setting?
6. What are the benefits and costs (including transition costs) of adopting a principles-basedapproach to U.S. standard setting?
How might those benefits and costs be quantified?
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
27/31
Principles Based vs. Rules Based
Accounting Standards
The AAAs position
Dissenting opinion
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
28/31
International Convergence
FASB & IASB pledged
Achieve compatibility
Maintain compatibility
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
29/31
FASB-IASB Financial Statement
Presentation Project
Establish common standard
Goals
Understand past and present financial position
Understand changes and causes of changes
Evaluate future cash flows
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
30/31
FASB-IASB Financial Statement
Presentation Project
3 Phases
A. What constitutes complete set of statements?
1. Financial position
2. Earnings and comprehensive income
3. Cash flows
4. Changes in equity
-
8/11/2019 Accounting Theory (Doni Rahmad,Bagaskara,Fachriza)
31/31
FASB-IASB Financial Statement
Presentation Project
3 Phases
B. Fundamental issues for presentation of
information
C. Presentation of interim financial information in
U.S. GAAP