Access and Median Option Appraisal

7/30/2019 Access and Median Option Appraisal

1/22Amey Report Template CON-GEN/Template/001/01

A55 Knock Road WideningAccess Option andCentral Median AppraisalIssue 4

NI004 - 00400445

20 th November 2009


2/22Amey Report Template CON-GEN/Template/001/01

Document Control SheetProject Name: A55 Knock Road Widening

Project Number: 00400445

Document / Report Title:

Access Option and Central Median Appraisal Issue 4

Document / Report Number:

CO00400445/Access/Issue 4

Issue Status/Amendment Prepared Reviewed Approved

Name:

John Jordan

Name:

Iain Morrison

Name:

Gary Livingstone

Issue 4Document reviewed forPublic Exhibition

Signature:JOHN JORDAN

Date: 20/11/09

Signature:IAIN MORRISON

Date: 20/11/09

Signature:GARY LIVINGSTONE

Date20/11/09

Name:

John Jordan

Name:

Eamonn Lynch

Name:

Gary Livingstone

Document reviewed

Signature:

Date: 22/09/08

Signature:

Date: 22/09/08

Signature:

Date: 22/09/08

Name:

John Jordan

Name:

Ross Hannigan

Name:

Gary Livingstone

Document reviewed andRSC material inserted

Signature:

Date: 01/08/08

Signature:

Date: 01/08/08

Signature:

Date: 01/08/08

Name:

John Jordan

Name:

Iain Morrison

Name:

Gary Livingstone

Draft Issued to Client forcomment

Signature:

Date: 28/05/08

Signature:

Date: 28/05/08

Signature:

Date: 28/05/08


3/22

Project Name: A55 Knock Road Widening

Document Title: Access Option and Median Appraisal Report

Doc ref: C00400445/Access/ Issue 4

Issued: November 2009- i -

Contents

1. Foreword........................................................................................................................12. Access Appraisal ..........................................................................................................22.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................22.2. Option 1 ..........................................................................................................................42.3. Option 2 ..........................................................................................................................42.4. Option 3 ..........................................................................................................................52.5. Residents Meetings ........................................................................................................52.6. Junction Modelling ..........................................................................................................62.7. Appraisal Table...............................................................................................................72.8. Conclusion / Recommendation .......................................................................................9

3. Median Appraisal ........................................................................................................103.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................103.2. DMRB Requirements....................................................................................................113.3. Option 1 - 10m min Central Reserve ............................................................................123.4. Option 2 - 5m min Central Reserve ..............................................................................123.5. Option 3 - Closure of Central Reserve..........................................................................133.6. Direct Access onto A55.................................................................................................143.7. Appraisal Table.............................................................................................................143.8. Recommendation..........................................................................................................153.9. Horizontal and Vertical Geometry.................................................................................16

Appendix A - DrawingsAppendix B - Access Option Cost EstimatesAppendix C - Shandon Park Traffic SurveyAppendix D - ConsultationsAppendix E - Accident InformationAppendix F - Junction Modelling Outputs


4/22




Issued: November 2009- ii -

List of Figures

Figure 1: Existing Access Points...............................................................................................2

Figure 2: Junction of Knock Road and Knockwood Park........................................................10

Figure 3: Excerpt from DMRB Vol 6: TD 42.95, Para 7.38 & 7.39 .........................................11

Figure 4: Alternate exits from Clarawood Estate with Option 3 ..............................................13

List of Tables

Table 1: Junction Modelling Results........................................................................................6

Table 2: Access Option Appraisal Summary Table.................................................................7

Table 3: Access Option Advantages and Disadvantages .......................................................8

Table 4: Central Median Appraisal Summary Table..............................................................14

Table 5: Horizontal Geometry................................................................................................16

Table 6: Vertical Geometry....................................................................................................17


5/22




Issued: November 2009- 1-

1. Foreword

1.1.1. The purpose of this document is to summarise the work carried out by Amey Consulting

and Roads Service Consultancy with regard to the issues of access to properties

between Shandon Park and Kensington Road, and the width of the central median at

Clarawood Estate respectively.

1.1.2. It outlines the advantages and disadvantages of the options considered by the Design

Team and makes recommendations to be brought forward to detail design.


6/22





2. Access Appraisal

2.1. Introduction

2.1.1. One of the key design issues of the A55 Knock Road widening scheme is to enhance

the safety of access and exit from properties for residents living on the Knock Road

between Shandon Park and Kensington Road. Currently, these residents have to exit

directly onto the Knock Road via substandard accesses with poor visibility. The

construction of the new road will affect these accesses further so an alternative access

road must be provided to mitigate this problem.

Figure 1: Existing Access Points

2.1.2. At present there are four accesses onto the A55 Outer Ring between Shandon Park and

Kensington Road serving six properties:

1. Kinsgden Park to 1 and 1a

2. Laneway to 64, 66, and 68 Knock Road

3. Laneway to 60 Knock Road (Marie Curie Fundraising House)

4. A disused right of way

1

2

4

3


7/22





2.1.3. As part of the design process, numerous options were considered, appraised and

costed. Eight options were brought before the Client, and from those eight alternatives,

two recommendations were made by Amey Consulting. This was subsequently revised

to three options after meeting with the Deputy Divisional Roads Manager on 10th

March2008.

2.1.4. The choice of access option depends on whether 64 Knock Road is retained or

demolished as part of the main scheme:

If the house is retained, upon completion of the main alignment, the new retaining

wall will be 4.5m from the front of the property. There will be remedial work

required to maintain the house, including the construction of a secant pile

retaining wall. There may be a diminution in the value of the property due to its

close proximity to the widened road.

If the house is demolished, then there is the additional cost associated with

vesting the property. This is dependent on the value of the property at the time of

vesting. The 2005 estimate for the scheme valued 64 Knock Road at 450k.

2.1.5. All proposed options, which will be providing residential access off the A55 Knock Road,

were designed in accordance with advice set out in the Design Manual for Roads and

Bridges (DMRB). This was supplemented with guidance as set out in Creating Places 1,

which recommends the cross sectional dimensions of residential development roads:

5.5m wide carriageway for 0-200 dwellings;

2m wide footway; Radii of internal corners are minimum of 25m where no more than 50 dwellings

are served; Junction radius with the Knock Road is a minimum of 6m; Access Roads to be adopted by Roads Service (RS) according to their policy

1 Creating Places is a guidance document issued by the Planning Service and Department for Regional Development and is

intended for use in the design of all proposals for residential developments throughout Northern Ireland. The guidelines in this

document form the basis for assessing any proposal.


8/22





2.2. Option 1

2.2.1. Drg No. 400445-SK-049-01 (Appendix A)

2.2.2. This option is recommended if 64 Knock Road is retained. A new road provides access

to Kingsden Park and to Nos. 64, 66 and 68 Knock Road and any future development

on remaining Roads Service land. Right turn out is prevented by the central islands and

therefore banned to improve safety at the adjacent Shandon Park/Sandown

Road/Knock Road junction. Meanwhile a new road is constructed to allow Marie Curie

to access their fundraising house (No. 60). This road will also facilitate the 3 rd party

owned land to the rear of a Roads Service plot without the need for another separate

access onto the main road.

2.2.3. The banned right turn would result in residents having to turn left out of the road and

seek an alternate route for travelling northbound. Similarly for those residents wishing

to turn into the access travelling on the northbound A55, alternate routes will have to be

used. A few possible solutions for both entry and exit have been proposed in Drg No.

400445-SK-049-04 and can be found in Appendix A.

2.2.4. A Traffic Calming scheme has been proposed for the Shandon Park area by Network

Development. Whilst this scheme will be designed to discourage the rat-run of

through traffic, any traffic calming scheme that is installed will increase the journey

times for the suggested alternate routes.

2.2.5. Despite retaining 64 Knock Road, there may be an associated decrease in its value dueto its proximity to the new road. There is also an additional cost for the construction of a

secant pile retaining wall in front of the property to protect it. This has been accounted

for in the overall cost of the option.

2.3. Option 2


2.3.2. This option is recommended if 64 Knock Road is vested by Roads Service. The house

would be demolished allowing 1 No. road to facilitate access to all the properties

(existing and future) between Shandon Park and Kensington Road. The access would

join with the A55 on Roads Service land next to Marie Curie before traversing down and

terminating at Kingsden Park.

2.3.3. The single access would have its own dedicated right turn pocket between the PSNI

emergency entrance and Knockcastle Park.


9/22





2.3.4. The cost for any retaining walls required has been included in the overall scheme

estimate. The construction of side slopes will move the access road away from the

main alignment and will reduce the area of land that can be developed.

2.3.5. There will be an associated cost with demolishing 64 Knock Road. The cost fordemolishing this property has been accounted for in the overall cost of the option.

2.4. Option 3


2.4.2. This option is another alternative should 64 Knock Road be vested by Roads Service. A

new road provides access to Kingsden Park and to Nos. 66 and 68 Knock Road andany future development on remaining Roads Service land. The road would terminate at

Marie Curies fundraising house.

2.4.3. The major difference between Option 2 and 3 is that this option does not exit onto the

A55 but onto Shandon Park, thus removing a potential point of conflict and increasing

safety along the main alignment. However this junction is 20m from stop line and 35m

from centre of junction. This conflicts not only with the Shandon Park/A55 junction but

also the new Ascot Link/Shandon Park junction.

2.4.4. Shandon Park is currently quite busy in the morning (on average 530 cars exiting 8am -

9am, Appendix C). The introduction of an further entrance for what could be developed

into a residential area could impact on both safety, with a potential increase in

collisions, and waiting times at the junction, with additional vehicles adding to the

existing queues.

2.4.5. The cost for any retaining walls required has been included in the overall scheme

estimate. The construction of side slopes will move the access road away from the

main alignment and will reduce the area of land that can be developed

2.4.6. There will be an associated cost with demolishing 64 Knock Road. The cost for

demolishing this property has been accounted for in the overall cost of this option.

2.5. Residents Meetings

2.5.1. Consultation with the affected residents and landowners with regard to the A55

widening and associated accommodation works has commenced. At time of writing, the

Client, representatives from Roads Service (Network Development and Lands Section)

and Amey Consulting have met with the residents of the affected properties.


10/22





2.5.2. The occupants of 64 Knock Road stated that in principle their preference would be to

have Roads Service purchase their house and knock it down for the scheme / access

road whilst holding on to as much land as possible at the rear of the site to allow for

redevelopment.2.5.3. A meeting was held with representatives from Marie Curie. It was agreed that no

access proposal would have a negative impact on the hospital building due to the

delicate nature of the work carried out there.

2.5.4. Residents in Shandon Park expressed opposition to an additional access road joining

Shandon Park, especially with Ascot Link being sited opposite. Residents were also

concerned with the current congestion in peak periods from commuter through-traffic

using Shandon Park as opposed to the main A55 Knock Road.

2.5.5. To address these concerns, Amey Consulting carried out additional traffic surveys at

the Shandon Park/A55 junction to establish existing queue lengths on Shandon Park.

The results of the traffic survey and some photographs showing the queues can be

found in Appendix C.

2.5.6. Further comments from residents as well as a list of addresses visited during the

consultation process can be found in Appendix D.

2.6. Junction Modelling

2.6.1. Further junction modelling of Shandon Park was carried out assuming Option 3 was to

be taken forward to see if the junction could cope with the additional vehicles envisaged

coming from Ascot Link and Option 3. The results of this show that the degree of

saturation of Shandon Park is as follows:

Table 1: Junction Modelling Results

AM PeakForecast Year

2008 2010 2025

Degree ofSaturation (%)

ExistingLayout

104.0 107.2 128.8


ProposedLayout withAscot Link

148.2 152.8 176.4


ProposedLayout withAscot Link

and Option 3

149.7 154.4 178.8


11/22





2.6.2. These results indicate that the addition of the two link roads into Shandon Park would

increase the level of saturation significantly, even further than would be expected with

normal increases in traffic between 2008 and 2025. This would increase queues on

Shandon Park. To alleviate this problem, the junction would require remodelling andShandon Park itself may require widening to improve turning facilities on this leg of the

junction. A full breakdown of the performance of each leg of the junction can be found

in Appendix F - Junction Modelling.

2.7. Appraisal Table

2.7.1. Below are summary tables for the three proposed options. A more detailed breakdown

of the costs can be found in Appendix B.

Table 2: Access Option Appraisal Summary Table

OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3

Drawing No. 400445-SK-049-01 400445-SK-049-02 400445-SK-049-03

Construction Cost 170,000 120,000* 160,000*

Land Cost (based on

1M/acre)35,000 65,000 23,000

Estimated Diminution ofValue of 64 Knock Road

(approx.)

150,000 - -

Vesting of 64 Knock Road(from 2005 scheme estimate)

- 450,000 450,000

Grand Total 355,000 635,000 633,000

Remaining accesses onto

A552 1 0

Value of Residual RS land(based on 1M/acre)

1,141,000 1,146,500 960,000

Net Value 786,000 511,500 327,000

* demolition costs for no. 64 not included.


12/22





Table 3: Access Option Advantages and Disadvantages

OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3Provides access to Roads

Service land

Provides access to Roads Service

land

Provides access to Roads

Service land

Provides wider access for all

the residences in the area

Provides wider access for all the

residences in the area

Provides wider access for all the

residences in the area

Improves safety of main

alignment

Access moved as much as

possible onto Roads Service land

Greatest improvement in safety

of main alignment

Reduces number of accesses

on A55 from four to two

New private access for Marie

Curie to replace existing

Removes all accesses from main

alignment

Better gradient up to Marie

Curie

Reduces number of access on

A55 from four to one

One access for all properties

along section of scheme

Increases usable space of

Marie Curie land - existingdriveway will be stopped up

No need for additional access Increases usable space of Marie

Curie land - existing drivewaywill be stopped up

No extra vesting required

which provides a cost benefit

One access for all properties

along section of scheme

All traffic from properties joins

main road from signalised

junction

Provides wider access for all

the residences in the area

Maximises development potential

of RS land

Increases usable space of Marie

Curie land - existing driveway will

be stopped up

A d v a n t a g e s

Improves safety of main alignment

Greatest detours for both

access/egress for Kingsden

Park residents.

Additional lands required from 3 rd

party land

Requires 64 Knock Road to be

demolished

Conflict with Shandon Park

junctions

Requires 64 Knock Road to be

demolished

Reduces Roads Service

development potential by using

RS land

Moving access towards Marie

Curie would conflict with

Knockvale Park

Slight detour for both

access/egress for Kingsden Park

residents.

Traffic impact - Increases

demand at Shandon junction

Serves Marie Curie and 3rd

party land.

Visibility required at junction with

A55 leading to reduced

development potential of RS land

at that location

Will require a departure from

standard to allow positioning of

access

Reduces Roads Service

development potential by

using RS land

New access would be too close

to new Shandon junction

(Access is 20m from Stop Line

and 35m from centre of junction)

D i s a

d v a n t a g e s

Slight detour for both

access/egress for Kingsden Park

residents.


13/22





2.8. Conclusion / Recommendation

2.8.1. Whilst providing the greatest Net Value, Option 1 would be constructed at great risk and

inconvenience to 64 Knock Road. It requires a secant pile wall to retain the property,

which would be approximately 4.5m from the front of the building. A full structural

survey of the property would need to be carried out prior to and after the construction of

the wall to accurately determine the damage to the house, if any. The loss of land to

the front of the property and its proximity to the A55 may reduce the overall value of the

property.

2.8.2. Option 3 removes all the extra access points on the A55 and relocates them to a single

access on Shandon Park. This is an improvement on the safety of the Knock Road, but

it introduces another access onto Shandon Park. This already busy intersection will

also accommodate the new Ascot Park and it is Ameys opinion, based on the junction

modelling that the additional traffic will saturate the junction further and increase the

likelihood of collisions.

2.8.3. Initial meetings with residents have indicated that Option 2 is the most favourable to

solve the problems they currently face with gaining access to their properties.

2.8.4. Option 2 reduces the number of accesses onto the A55 between Shandon Park and

Kensington Road from four to one, thereby improving safety of the adjacent main road.

2.8.5. Option 2 requires the vesting of 64 Knock Road. This property was included in the 2005

scheme estimate at 450,000.

2.8.6. The cost of a Kingsden access was in the 2005 scheme estimate at 104,000. The

increase in the construction cost of Option 2 to 185,000 reduces the scheme Optimism

Bias to 18%. (2005 estimate stated OB of 20%).

2.8.7. It is the opinion of Roads Service Consultancy and Amey Consulting that Option 2 is the

best solution for accessing the existing and any future properties in the area.


14/22




Issued: November 2009- 10 -

3. Median Appraisal

3.1. Introduction

3.1.1. Currently the central median at the Knockwood Park junction is 2.3m wide. A banned u-

turn currently is in place. Right turning traffic out of Clarawood encounters difficulty

crossing four lanes. A two stage manoeuvre is often required which leaves traffic in the

central island partially exposed to oncoming traffic. The proposed widening of the

median will improve road conditions and increase safety at this junction.

Figure 2: Junction of Knock Road and Knockwood Park


15/22





3.2. Design Manual for Roads and Bridges Requirements

Figure 3: Excerpt from DMRB Vol 6: TD 42.95, Para 7.38 & 7.39

3.2.1. As this junction is situated within the dual section of the A55, the above paragraphs

from the DMRB must apply as it is specified as mandatory.

3.2.2. Provision of a lesser central island width must be approved as a departure from

standards.

Width of Physical Islands in the Centre

7.38 At single lane dualling and dual carriageway junctions, the width of thecentral island at the crossing point shall be 10.0m, including centralreserve hardstrips. In exceptional circumstances where use by very longvehicles is expected and a roundabout is not feasible, a width of 14.0mincluding hardstrips, will be needed to shelter the largest articulatedvehicles (16.5m) and a width of 16.5m, including hardstrips, will berequired to shelter drawbar trailer combinations (18.35m).

7.39 The minimum width of a physical island, usually located at the end of thedirect taper shall be 3.5m (shown in figs 7/5 & 7/6).


16/22





3.2.3. The application for a departure from standards takes account of the restricted Stopping

Sight Distance (SSD) on approach to the gap in the central median and the sub-

standard sight splay for vehicles exiting Clarawood estate.

3.3. Option 1 - 10m min Central Reserve

3.3.1. Drg No. WK/24/05/10mCR3 (Appendix A)

3.3.2. Overview:-

The provision of the 10m provides an improvement in safety for all

vehicles right turning out of Clarawood Estate. Accident Information for

Clarawood junction can be found in Appendix E.

Provides compliance with the requirements in DMRB; Reduced risk of being identified as CDM Risk at Public Inquiry or Safety

Audit; Maintains right turning provision entry/exit to Clarawood Estate; Improves the current level of accessibility and integration for the residents

of Clarawood Estate; Increased costs equate to approx 1.7% (165k - see Page 11) of scheme

budget (9.7m).

3.4. Option 2 - 5m min Central Reserve

3.4.1. Drg No.WK/24/05/5mCR3 (Appendix A)

3.4.2. Overview:-

The provision of the 5m median provides a marginal improvement from

the 2.3m median in safety for smaller vehicles right turning out of

Clarawood Estate. Does not comply with the requirements in DMRB (see Figure 3) Safety Audit identified the right turn exit from Clarawood as a risk, (refer to

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit, para. 3.5.9 (Audit based on existing and 5m

Layout) ) CDM requires designer to Eliminate hazards and reduce risks during

design Maintains right turning provision entry/exit to Clarawood Estate. Maintains the current level of accessibility and integration for the residents

of Clarawood Estate Costs already included in scheme estimate 9.7m


17/22





3.5. Option 3 - Closure of Central Reserve

3.5.1. Drg No. WK/24/05/5mCR4 (Appendix A)

3.5.2. Overview:-

Significant improvements in safety as all right turning movements

associated with the Clarawood Estate have been removed. Complies with CDM requirements for designer to Eliminate hazards and

reduce risks during design. Reduces the level of Accessibility and Integration for the residents of

Clarawood Estate. Significant diversionary routes for residents from south side of Clarawood

Estate, with possibility of opposition from residents association.

Alternative exits are located at Clara Road onto Sandown Road and

Grand Parade leading to the A23 Castlereagh Road. (See Figure 4 for

locations of exits and Drg No. 400445-SK-050 in Appendix A for alternate

routes and additional journey times) Closed median is currently designed to be 5m but could be reduced to

2.5m. Marginal reduction (40k - see Page 14) in scheme costs (reduction in

possible land take from Golf Course and carriageway widening).

Figure 4: Alternate exits from Clarawood Estate with Option 3

KNOCK ROAD

SANDOWN ROAD

CASTLEREAGH ROAD

GRAND PARADE KNOCKWOOD PARK


18/22





3.6. Central Median Appraisal Table

Option 1 - (10m min Central Reserve).

Option 2 - (5m min Central Reserve).

Option 3 - (Closure of Central Reserve).

Table 4: Central Median Appraisal Summary Table

Description Option 1 Option 2 Option 3Provides compliance with the requirements

in DMRB.

Yes No N/A

Improvements in safety for right turning

movements associated with the Clarawood

Estate.

Yes

(Full)

Yes

(Marginal)

N/A

Addresses problem identified in Stage 1

Safety Audit refer to para. 3.5.9 (Right turn

exiting Clarawood)

Yes No Yes

Addresses CDM requirements for designer

to Eliminate hazards and reduce risks

during design.

Yes No Yes

Maintains right turning provision entry/exit

to the Clarawood Estate.

Yes Yes No

Maintains the current level of accessibility

and integration for the residents of

Clarawood Estate.

Yes Yes No

Effect on scheme cost + 1.7%

165k

Nil -0.5%

40k

Increased possibility of encouraging U-turn

manoeuvres

Yes Yes No

3.7. Direct Access onto A55

Knockmount Kings Road

3.7.1. As the Dual section of the A55 terminates at Ch 200 (just prior to Knockmount Park) all

accesses are dealt with as right turning pockets under the provisions of TD42/95

3.7.2. Residents living in close proximity to the signalised junction with Sandown

Road/Shandon Park will be unable to make a right turn manoeuvre to access their

properties. The central median area from Ch 420 Ch 660 will be constructed as traffic

islands, physically preventing access across the carriageway at this location. The

properties affected and alternative routes are detailed on Drawing Nos SK-048-01 &

SK-048-02. (Refer to Appendix A)


19/22





3.8. Recommendation

3.8.1. Roads Service Consultancy and Amey Consulting proposes the 10m central median as

it is the minimum standard that complies with the DMRB. Provision of a lesser central

island width must be approved as a departure from standards. In addition, the

application for a departure from standards should take account of the restricted stopping

sight distance on approach to the gap in the central median and the sub-standard sight

splay for vehicles exiting Clarawood estate.


20/22





3.9. Horizontal and Vertical Geometry1. Carriageway Lane widths:

Main alignment 'A55 Knock Road' (lane 1 = 3.50m, lane 2 = 3.30m wide). 4.5m wide hatched central median with 3.5m wide with right turning pockets. All right/left turning lanes at major junctions are to be 3.50m wide

2. Joint Cycleway / Footway widths: 4.5m / 5.0m wide on northern footway & 3.5m wide on southern footway.

3. Design Speed: 60kph (ref TD9/93).

4. Desirable Minimum Stopping Sight Distance = 90m (ref TD9/93 Table 3).

Table 5: Horizontal Geometry

Geometry ElementNo.

Chainage Type Departure StoppingSight

Distance

Departure

Horizontal 1 0 49.861 Left Hand Radius

271.932m

N/A 120 N/A

Horizontal 2 49.861 123.294 Left Hand Radius

290m

N/A 120 N/A


3000m

N/A 160+ N/A

Horizontal 4 170.787 269.559 Straight N/A 160+ N/A WithHorizontal 5 269.559- 371.853 Right Hand Radius

180m

1 Step 72 1 Step F


3018.2m

N/A 160+ N/A


21/22





1. Carriageway Lane widths: Main alignment 'A55 Knock Road' (lane 1 = 3.50m, lane 2 = 3.30m wide).

4.5m wide hatched central median with 3.5m wide with right turning pockets. All right/left turning lanes at major junctions are to be 3.50m wide

2. Joint Cycleway / Footway widths: 4.5m / 5.0m wide on Northern footway & 3.5m wide on Southern

footway.

3. Design Speed: 60kph (ref TD9/93).

4. Desirable Minimum Stopping Sight Distance = 90m (ref TD9/93 Table 3).

Table 6: Vertical Geometry

Geometry ElementNo.

Chainage K Values StoppingSight

Distance

Type Departure

Vertical 1 0 - 92.622 70.62 --- Crest Ok

Vertical 2 92.622 - 145.474 20 --- Sag Ok

Vertical 3 145.474 - 237.235 93.75 --- Sag Ok

Vertical 4 237.235 - 301.025 10 --- Sag 1 Step

Vertical 5 301.025 - 363.051 50 220.85 Crest Ok

Vertical 6 363.051 - 451.062 5.263 49.789 Crest 3 Steps


22/22

Access and Median Option Appraisal

Documents

Transcript of Access and Median Option Appraisal