ACBT 2014
-
Upload
nurul-kartika-sari -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of ACBT 2014
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
1/9
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 105
Immediate effects of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniqueand Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in Subjects with
Bronchiectasis - A Comparative Study
S Ram Anand1, D Anandhi2
1Lecturer, Srinivas College of Physiotherapy & Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, 2Associate Professor
SRM College of Physiotherapy& Research Centre, SRM University, Chennai,Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
Background: The prevalence of Bronchiectasis in India, is 10 fold increase in in persons with high
exposure to Arsenic caused skin lesions in West Bengal in 2005.The prevalence was higher among
women than men 71 vs 32/1, 00,000 and increased markedly with age 4/1, 00,000 for people aged 18-
34 years & 272/1, 00,000 for those aged 75.
Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the Immediate effects of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique
and Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in subjects with Bronchiectasis.
Methodology: StudyDesign-Experimental Design; Study Type-Comparative Study;Sample Size-
30Subjects; Sampling Method - Convenient Sampling;Sampling Specification - Group A-15 subjects
& Group B-15 subjects; Study Setting - Department of TUBERCULOSIS AND CHEST DISEASES,
SRM Medical college Hospital & Research centre, Kattankulathur. chennai. Tamilnadu, India. Study
Duration - 3 months.
Results:Comparing the values of Sputum volume between Group A and Group B, Group B showed
a significant difference than Group A. (P
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
2/9
106 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1
infected, non-functioning lung segment. RENE
LANNAC made the first description of bronchiectasis
in 1819 (European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;
2001)2.
Incidence & Prevalence
According to NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, BLOODINSTITUTE 1999; Death rate extrapolations for U.S.A.
for Bronchiectasis was 969 per year; 80 per month; 18
per week; 2 per day4.
According to STARSHIP CHILDRENS HEALTH
CLINICAL GUIDELINES-in 2000 a retrospective
review of children attending the Bronchiectasis clinic
found a crude prevalence rate 1:6000 in the Auckland
paediatric population. A prospective national study
reporting all new cases diagnosed (2001-2003) using
the Newzland paediatric surveillance unit gave an
incidence of 3.7/1, 00,000 children per year. This is 7
times higher than the only other comparable national
study from Finland. 80% of the children were Maori
or pacific peoples indicating a disproportionate
prevalence of Bronchiectasis at 1/1875 for pacific
peoples, 1/4244 for Maori and 1/24,900 for European
groups. In 2008 March, >160 children are reported in
STARSHIP BRONCHIECTASIS CLINIC statistics for
Bronchiectasis.In England 2002-2003; 39% of hospital
consultant episodes for Bronchiectasis were men and
61% were women4.
In India, it was the recent finding of a 10 fold
increase in Bronchiectasis prevalence in persons with
high exposure to Arsenic caused skin lesions in West
Bengal in 2005.The prevalence was higher among
women than men 71 vs 32/1, 00,000 and increased
markedly with age 4/1, 00,000 for people aged 18-34
years & 272/1, 00,000 for those aged 75 or over 4.
METHODOLOGY
The study aims to establish the Immediate effects
of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique and
Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in subjects with
Bronchiectasis.
Research Specification
Study Design Experimental Design;Study Type
Comparative Study;Sample Size 30
Subjects;Sampling Method Convenient
Sampling;Sampling Specification Group A-15
subjects & Group B-15 subjects;Study Setting
Department of TUBERCULOSIS AND CHEST
DISEASES,SRM Medical college Hospital &
Research centre,Kattankulathur-Chennai;Study
Duration 3 months.
Materials Used
Sputum produced during and following the
treatment was collected into the Mucus Extractorand its volume measured in millilitres.
The Peak expiratory flow rate in liters/sec was
measured by using A mini-Wrights peak flow
meter.
Inclusion Criteria
Diagnosed cases of Bronchiectasis by Chest
Physician (X-RAY, CT, PFT)
Age group 35 60 years
Both Males and Females
Subjects with expectorated sputum quantity of
10ml - > 150 ml/day
Subjects with stable Hemodynamics
Subjects under medications for Bronchiectasis
(antibiotics, bronchodilators, etc)
Exclusion Criteria
Pulmonary hypertension
Angina
Diabetes mellitus
Pulmonary embolism
Pneumothorax
Tuberculosis
Bronchial Asthma
Any chest trauma
Corpulmonale
Recent Abdominal surgery
Children
Testing Procedure
A comparative study was done on subjects with
Bronchiectasis to establish the Immediate effects of
Active Cycle of Breathing Technique and Conventional
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
3/9
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 107
Chest Physiotherapy in subjects with Bronchiectasis.
After selecting the sample, test procedure was
explained to the subjects, a written consent was
collected from the subjects to participate in the study.
The time taken for discussion and for the
determination of the individuals pre-test
measurements allowed for a period of rest prior totesting. The 30 subjects who fitted into the inclusion
criteria were randomized into 2 groups A &B.
Precautions
The subjects were asked to maintain the following
precautions
Avoid heavy meals within 2 hours of testing.
Wear comfortable clothing.
Pre&Post test measurements
Expectorated sputum in millilitres
Peak expiratory flow rate in litres/second
For both the groups, Peak expiratory flow rate was
measured using Pea expiratory flow meter.
For both the groups, expectorated sputum was
measured using Mucus Extractor.
Group A
Active Cycle of Breathing Technique
Subjects were made to sit with back support and
asked to maintain a good breathing pattern with
relaxed shoulders and neck and breathe in through
the nose and out through the mouth. Breathing out
should be slow, like sighing out. This minimizes any
wheezing19.
Breathing Control: Rest one hand on abdomen,
keeping shoulders and upper chest relaxed and allowtheir hand to rise gently as they breathe in. (If they
imagine air filling the abdomen like a balloon this may
help) Sigh out gently and ensure that the shoulders
remain relaxed. Over a few seconds, gradually increase
depth of breathing while maintaining relaxation.
Breathing control is an essential part of the cycle to
allow rest19.
Deep Breathing Exercises: Take 3 4 deep breaths
in, allowing the lower chest to expand. Try to ensure
neck and shoulders remain relaxed. At the end of the
breath in, hold the air in for 3 seconds .Let the air out
gently19.
Forced Expiration Technique/Huff: Huffs are
combined with breathing control and they were asked
to take a half breath in and blow air out steadily
through an open mouth. Follow this with breathing
control as secretion moves into larger airways. Take a
deep breath in and blow air out again through an open
mouth. A typical cycle consists of: Breathing control, 3
4 deep breaths, breathing control, forced expiration
technique/Huff. The total treatment session was 30
minutes19. The treatment sessions were performed
under supervision and at the same time of the day.
Group B
Conventional Chest Physiotherapy
All the 15 subjects in the Group B were allocated to
Conventional Chest Physiotherapy. The Conventional
Chest Physiotherapy consists of Postural drainage,
Percussion, Pressure-vibration, active bilateral
respiratory exercises. The total treatment session was
performed under supervision and at the same time of
the day. All usual medications are to be administrated
during the study days19, 31.
Statistical Analysis
The independent variables are Sputum & Peak
Expiratory Flow Rate. The Statistical Package Graph
Pad Prism was used for data analysis.
The statistical tools used in this study are pairedt
test and independentt test
Pairedt test
Pairedt test was used to find out the significant
difference in improvement between pre and posttreatment values between Group A and Group B for
Sputum & Peak expiratory flow rate.
Studentt test
The student independentt test is used to compare
the significant differences between group A and group
B for Peak expiratory flow rate.
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
4/9
108 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1
Data Analysis
Table 1. Comparison Between Group a and Group B Post-test Sputum Volume
Sputum Group A Group B Df Calculated Table PValue value Value
Mean S.D Mean S.D
Post Treatment 3.73 1.486 6.00 1.512 28 4.141 1.701 0.9503
There is significant difference between the post- test sputum volume between Group A and Group B (P< 0.05).
Graph 1. A Comparison Between Post-test Sputum Volume In Group A And Group B
Total Number of Subjects
Mean
Table 2. Comparison Between Pre and Post Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Values in Group A
PEFR Group A Calculatedvalue Tablevalue Df P Value
mean S.d
Pre 192 62.01 9.727 3.787 14 0.0001
Post 210 63.74
PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
There is significant difference between Pre and Post test values of Group A in Peak expiratory flow rate (P< 0.05).
Graph 2. Comparison Between Pre And Post Pefr In Group A
Mean
Total Number of Subjects
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
5/9
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 109
Table 3. Comparison Between Pre and Post Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Values In Group B
PEFR Group B Calculatedvalue Tablevalue Df P Value
mean S.d
Pre 192 43.9 10.31 3.787 14 0.0001
Post 288 49.01
PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
There is significant difference between Pre and Post test values of Group B in Peak expiratory flow rate (P< 0.05).
Graph 3. Comparison Between Pre And Post Pefr In Group B
Mean
Total Number of Subjects
Table 4. Comparison Of Post Test Values Of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Between Group A and Group B
Sputum Group A Group B Df Calculated Table PValue value Value
Mean S.D Mean S.D
Post Treatment 210.6 63.7 288 49.01 28 0.834 1.701 0.410
PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
There is no significant difference between the post-test Peak expiratory flow rate values between Group A and Group B (P > 0.05).
Graph 4. Comparison Between Group-A and Group-B Post PEFR
Mean
Total Number of Subjects
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
6/9
110 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1
RESULTS
The purpose of the study was to compare the
Immediate effects of Active Cycle of Breathing
Technique and Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in
subjects with Bronchiectasis.
From Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4 the following inferencesare made.
From Table 1: Group B (6.00) showed improved
sputum volume than Group A (3.73) with t-value
of (4.141) and P-value of (0.9503).
From Table 2: Peak expiratory flow rate values
improved in Group A between Pre test (192) and
Post-test (210) with t-value of (9.729) and P-value
(0.0001).
From Table 3: Peak expiratory flow rate valuesimproved in Group B between Pre test (192) and
Post-test (288) with t-value of (10.31) and P-value
(0.0001).
From Table 4: Peak expiratory flow rate values
between Group A (210.6) and Group B (288) with
t-value of (0.834) and P-value (0.410) does not show
significant difference in Post test Peak expiratory
flow rate.
Hence, by comparing the values of Sputum volume
between Group A and Group B, Group B showed asignificant difference than Group A. (P
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
7/9
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 111
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Srm University, Department of Physiotherapy &
Rc,Department of Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases
&Rc, Srm Multi-speciality Hospital & Rc,
Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram. distChennai,Tamil
Nadu, India.
Conflict of Interest: None (There is No Objection to
Anyone For My Study).
Source of Funding: No Agency or Trust is Sponsered
for my Study.
REFERENCES
1. Nick HT ten Hacken and Thys Vander molen
(2010); Definition, Diagnosis for Bronchiectasis;
British Medical Journal, 341:c2766.
2. Parker R (2001); Description of Bronchiectasis.EurJ of cardiac surgery, 2001, 20:19-24.
3. Notaranglelo et. al (2010); Causes for Bronchiectasis.
emedicine specialities Encyclopedia, 06-22.
4. United states National Heart,Lung,Blood
Institute(1999); Incidence and prevalence of
Bronchiectasis.
5. Joshua o Benditt, (2008); Pathophysiology of
Bronchiectasis.Merk manual Professional.
6. Naidich DP, McCauley DI, Khouri NF, Stitik FP,
Siegelman SS. (1982); Computed tomography in
the recognition of bronchiectasis. J Comput AssistTomogr ; 6:43.
7. Mackenzie CF, Shin B, Hadi F, Imle PC. (1980);
Changes in total lung/thorax compliance
following chest physiotherapy. Anesth Analg;
59(3):207-210.
8. Clarke SW (2005); Effect of Sputum on Pulmonary
function .Thorax 28:262.
9. University of California San Francisco, (2009);
Medical management for Bronchiectasis.
10. Ethen E Emmons et.al (2010); Physical therapy
Techniques used for Airway clearance tomaintain the Bronchial Hygiene. emedicine
specialities Encyclopedia.
11. Smith M, Ball V (2005); Cashs Text book of
Cardiovascular Respiratory physiotherapy;
Elsevier.
12. Good fellow LT (2002); Bronchial hygiene
therapy. Am J Nurs, 102, 1, 37-42.
13. Jones A, Rowe BH. (2000); Bronchopulmonary
hygiene physical therapy in bronchiectasis and
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A
systematic review. Heart Lung 2000; 29:125-35.
14. ONeill B, Bradley J, McArdle N, McMahon J
(2000); The current physiotherapy management
of patients with bronchiectasis: A UK survey. Int
J Clin Pract ; 56:3435.
15. Lannefors L,wollmer P(2002);Mucus Clearance
with three chest physiotherapy regimes in Cystic
fibrosis,a comparison to postural drainage, PEPand physical exercise.Eur Respir J 5:748-753 H.
16. Jamal ali moiz, et al (2007); A comparison of
Autogenic Drainage and the Active Cycle of
Breathing Technique in patients with acute
exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive pulmonary
disease. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and
Occupational therapy 2007; vol.1, no.2.
17. Savci, Sema, Ince Deniz (2000); A comparison of
Autogenic drainage and Active cycle of
Breathing Technique in COPD disease. Journal
of Cardiopulmonary Rehab 20:36-43.18. Syed N (2009); Active cycles of breathing
technique (ACBT) versus conventional chest
physical therapy on airway clearance in
bronchiectasis a crossover tr ial. Adv
Physiotherapy, 11, 4, 193-8.
19. Hristara-Papadopoulou,et al (2007);.Results of
Active cycle of Breathing Technique and
Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in
mucociliary clearance in children with Cystic
Fibrosis.Hippokratia 2007;11,4:202-204.
20. MC Cool.FD. (2006); Conventional chestphysiotherapy for airway clearance to improve
Lung mechanics and gas exchange to prevent
infection. ACCP evidence based clinical practice
guidelines.
21. Ashaour M, Al-Kattan K, Rafay MA, Saja KF,
Hajjar W, Al-Fraye AR.(1999);Current surgical
therapy for bronchiectasis. World J Surg 1999;
23:1096- 104.
22. Annest LS, Kratz JM, Crawford FA Jr. (1982);
Current results of treatment of bronchiectasis. J
Thorax Cardiovascular Surg 1982; 83:546-50.
23. Eaton T (2007); A randomized evaluation of the
acute efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of
Flutter and active cycle of breathing with and
without postural drainage in non-cystic fibrosis
bronchiectasis. Chron Respir Dis, 4: 23-30.
24. Oermann CM, Swank PR, Sockrider (2000);
Validation of an instrument measuring patient
satisfaction with physiotherapy techniques in
Cystic fibrosis.
25. Baldwin (2007); Effect of addition of exercise to
chest physiotherapy on sputum expectoration
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
8/9
112 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1
and lung function in Cystic fibrosis adults. Respir
Med, 88, 49-53.
26. Pryor JC (2005); Mucociliary clearance; Key issues
in Cardio respiratory Physiotherapy.
27. Janet E. Patterson (2005); Airway Bronchiectasis:
A Randomized Crossover Trial of Active Cycle
of Breathing Techniques versus AcapellaClearance in Bronchiectasis Vol. 72, No. 3.
28. Lapin, Waldes R, Sampson D, Newhouse MT.
(2002); Effect of chest physiotherapy on the
removal of mucus in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126:131-135.
29. W.R.Douma (1997); Mini-Wrights peak flow
meters are reliable after 5 years.Eur. Resp J;
457-459.
30. Sutton PP, Parker RA, Webber BA, Newman SP,
Garland N, Lopez-Vidriero MT,et al.(1993);
Assessment of the forced expiration technique
postural drainage and directed coughing in chestphysiotherapy. Eur J Respir Dis 1993; 64:62-68.
31. Butler SG, Sutherland RJ (1998); Current airway
clearance techniques. overview of manual
techniques, breathing techniques, devices and
exercise. NZ Med J, 111, 183-6
-
8/10/2019 ACBT 2014
9/9
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.