ACBT 2014

download ACBT 2014

of 9

Transcript of ACBT 2014

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    1/9

    Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 105

    Immediate effects of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniqueand Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in Subjects with

    Bronchiectasis - A Comparative Study

    S Ram Anand1, D Anandhi2

    1Lecturer, Srinivas College of Physiotherapy & Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, 2Associate Professor

    SRM College of Physiotherapy& Research Centre, SRM University, Chennai,Tamil Nadu, India

    ABSTRACT

    Background: The prevalence of Bronchiectasis in India, is 10 fold increase in in persons with high

    exposure to Arsenic caused skin lesions in West Bengal in 2005.The prevalence was higher among

    women than men 71 vs 32/1, 00,000 and increased markedly with age 4/1, 00,000 for people aged 18-

    34 years & 272/1, 00,000 for those aged 75.

    Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the Immediate effects of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique

    and Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in subjects with Bronchiectasis.

    Methodology: StudyDesign-Experimental Design; Study Type-Comparative Study;Sample Size-

    30Subjects; Sampling Method - Convenient Sampling;Sampling Specification - Group A-15 subjects

    & Group B-15 subjects; Study Setting - Department of TUBERCULOSIS AND CHEST DISEASES,

    SRM Medical college Hospital & Research centre, Kattankulathur. chennai. Tamilnadu, India. Study

    Duration - 3 months.

    Results:Comparing the values of Sputum volume between Group A and Group B, Group B showed

    a significant difference than Group A. (P

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    2/9

    106 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1

    infected, non-functioning lung segment. RENE

    LANNAC made the first description of bronchiectasis

    in 1819 (European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;

    2001)2.

    Incidence & Prevalence

    According to NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, BLOODINSTITUTE 1999; Death rate extrapolations for U.S.A.

    for Bronchiectasis was 969 per year; 80 per month; 18

    per week; 2 per day4.

    According to STARSHIP CHILDRENS HEALTH

    CLINICAL GUIDELINES-in 2000 a retrospective

    review of children attending the Bronchiectasis clinic

    found a crude prevalence rate 1:6000 in the Auckland

    paediatric population. A prospective national study

    reporting all new cases diagnosed (2001-2003) using

    the Newzland paediatric surveillance unit gave an

    incidence of 3.7/1, 00,000 children per year. This is 7

    times higher than the only other comparable national

    study from Finland. 80% of the children were Maori

    or pacific peoples indicating a disproportionate

    prevalence of Bronchiectasis at 1/1875 for pacific

    peoples, 1/4244 for Maori and 1/24,900 for European

    groups. In 2008 March, >160 children are reported in

    STARSHIP BRONCHIECTASIS CLINIC statistics for

    Bronchiectasis.In England 2002-2003; 39% of hospital

    consultant episodes for Bronchiectasis were men and

    61% were women4.

    In India, it was the recent finding of a 10 fold

    increase in Bronchiectasis prevalence in persons with

    high exposure to Arsenic caused skin lesions in West

    Bengal in 2005.The prevalence was higher among

    women than men 71 vs 32/1, 00,000 and increased

    markedly with age 4/1, 00,000 for people aged 18-34

    years & 272/1, 00,000 for those aged 75 or over 4.

    METHODOLOGY

    The study aims to establish the Immediate effects

    of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique and

    Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in subjects with

    Bronchiectasis.

    Research Specification

    Study Design Experimental Design;Study Type

    Comparative Study;Sample Size 30

    Subjects;Sampling Method Convenient

    Sampling;Sampling Specification Group A-15

    subjects & Group B-15 subjects;Study Setting

    Department of TUBERCULOSIS AND CHEST

    DISEASES,SRM Medical college Hospital &

    Research centre,Kattankulathur-Chennai;Study

    Duration 3 months.

    Materials Used

    Sputum produced during and following the

    treatment was collected into the Mucus Extractorand its volume measured in millilitres.

    The Peak expiratory flow rate in liters/sec was

    measured by using A mini-Wrights peak flow

    meter.

    Inclusion Criteria

    Diagnosed cases of Bronchiectasis by Chest

    Physician (X-RAY, CT, PFT)

    Age group 35 60 years

    Both Males and Females

    Subjects with expectorated sputum quantity of

    10ml - > 150 ml/day

    Subjects with stable Hemodynamics

    Subjects under medications for Bronchiectasis

    (antibiotics, bronchodilators, etc)

    Exclusion Criteria

    Pulmonary hypertension

    Angina

    Diabetes mellitus

    Pulmonary embolism

    Pneumothorax

    Tuberculosis

    Bronchial Asthma

    Any chest trauma

    Corpulmonale

    Recent Abdominal surgery

    Children

    Testing Procedure

    A comparative study was done on subjects with

    Bronchiectasis to establish the Immediate effects of

    Active Cycle of Breathing Technique and Conventional

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    3/9

    Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 107

    Chest Physiotherapy in subjects with Bronchiectasis.

    After selecting the sample, test procedure was

    explained to the subjects, a written consent was

    collected from the subjects to participate in the study.

    The time taken for discussion and for the

    determination of the individuals pre-test

    measurements allowed for a period of rest prior totesting. The 30 subjects who fitted into the inclusion

    criteria were randomized into 2 groups A &B.

    Precautions

    The subjects were asked to maintain the following

    precautions

    Avoid heavy meals within 2 hours of testing.

    Wear comfortable clothing.

    Pre&Post test measurements

    Expectorated sputum in millilitres

    Peak expiratory flow rate in litres/second

    For both the groups, Peak expiratory flow rate was

    measured using Pea expiratory flow meter.

    For both the groups, expectorated sputum was

    measured using Mucus Extractor.

    Group A

    Active Cycle of Breathing Technique

    Subjects were made to sit with back support and

    asked to maintain a good breathing pattern with

    relaxed shoulders and neck and breathe in through

    the nose and out through the mouth. Breathing out

    should be slow, like sighing out. This minimizes any

    wheezing19.

    Breathing Control: Rest one hand on abdomen,

    keeping shoulders and upper chest relaxed and allowtheir hand to rise gently as they breathe in. (If they

    imagine air filling the abdomen like a balloon this may

    help) Sigh out gently and ensure that the shoulders

    remain relaxed. Over a few seconds, gradually increase

    depth of breathing while maintaining relaxation.

    Breathing control is an essential part of the cycle to

    allow rest19.

    Deep Breathing Exercises: Take 3 4 deep breaths

    in, allowing the lower chest to expand. Try to ensure

    neck and shoulders remain relaxed. At the end of the

    breath in, hold the air in for 3 seconds .Let the air out

    gently19.

    Forced Expiration Technique/Huff: Huffs are

    combined with breathing control and they were asked

    to take a half breath in and blow air out steadily

    through an open mouth. Follow this with breathing

    control as secretion moves into larger airways. Take a

    deep breath in and blow air out again through an open

    mouth. A typical cycle consists of: Breathing control, 3

    4 deep breaths, breathing control, forced expiration

    technique/Huff. The total treatment session was 30

    minutes19. The treatment sessions were performed

    under supervision and at the same time of the day.

    Group B

    Conventional Chest Physiotherapy

    All the 15 subjects in the Group B were allocated to

    Conventional Chest Physiotherapy. The Conventional

    Chest Physiotherapy consists of Postural drainage,

    Percussion, Pressure-vibration, active bilateral

    respiratory exercises. The total treatment session was

    performed under supervision and at the same time of

    the day. All usual medications are to be administrated

    during the study days19, 31.

    Statistical Analysis

    The independent variables are Sputum & Peak

    Expiratory Flow Rate. The Statistical Package Graph

    Pad Prism was used for data analysis.

    The statistical tools used in this study are pairedt

    test and independentt test

    Pairedt test

    Pairedt test was used to find out the significant

    difference in improvement between pre and posttreatment values between Group A and Group B for

    Sputum & Peak expiratory flow rate.

    Studentt test

    The student independentt test is used to compare

    the significant differences between group A and group

    B for Peak expiratory flow rate.

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    4/9

    108 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1

    Data Analysis

    Table 1. Comparison Between Group a and Group B Post-test Sputum Volume

    Sputum Group A Group B Df Calculated Table PValue value Value

    Mean S.D Mean S.D

    Post Treatment 3.73 1.486 6.00 1.512 28 4.141 1.701 0.9503

    There is significant difference between the post- test sputum volume between Group A and Group B (P< 0.05).

    Graph 1. A Comparison Between Post-test Sputum Volume In Group A And Group B

    Total Number of Subjects

    Mean

    Table 2. Comparison Between Pre and Post Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Values in Group A

    PEFR Group A Calculatedvalue Tablevalue Df P Value

    mean S.d

    Pre 192 62.01 9.727 3.787 14 0.0001

    Post 210 63.74

    PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

    There is significant difference between Pre and Post test values of Group A in Peak expiratory flow rate (P< 0.05).

    Graph 2. Comparison Between Pre And Post Pefr In Group A

    Mean

    Total Number of Subjects

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    5/9

    Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 109

    Table 3. Comparison Between Pre and Post Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Values In Group B

    PEFR Group B Calculatedvalue Tablevalue Df P Value

    mean S.d

    Pre 192 43.9 10.31 3.787 14 0.0001

    Post 288 49.01

    PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

    There is significant difference between Pre and Post test values of Group B in Peak expiratory flow rate (P< 0.05).

    Graph 3. Comparison Between Pre And Post Pefr In Group B

    Mean

    Total Number of Subjects

    Table 4. Comparison Of Post Test Values Of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Between Group A and Group B

    Sputum Group A Group B Df Calculated Table PValue value Value

    Mean S.D Mean S.D

    Post Treatment 210.6 63.7 288 49.01 28 0.834 1.701 0.410

    PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

    There is no significant difference between the post-test Peak expiratory flow rate values between Group A and Group B (P > 0.05).

    Graph 4. Comparison Between Group-A and Group-B Post PEFR

    Mean

    Total Number of Subjects

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    6/9

    110 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1

    RESULTS

    The purpose of the study was to compare the

    Immediate effects of Active Cycle of Breathing

    Technique and Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in

    subjects with Bronchiectasis.

    From Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4 the following inferencesare made.

    From Table 1: Group B (6.00) showed improved

    sputum volume than Group A (3.73) with t-value

    of (4.141) and P-value of (0.9503).

    From Table 2: Peak expiratory flow rate values

    improved in Group A between Pre test (192) and

    Post-test (210) with t-value of (9.729) and P-value

    (0.0001).

    From Table 3: Peak expiratory flow rate valuesimproved in Group B between Pre test (192) and

    Post-test (288) with t-value of (10.31) and P-value

    (0.0001).

    From Table 4: Peak expiratory flow rate values

    between Group A (210.6) and Group B (288) with

    t-value of (0.834) and P-value (0.410) does not show

    significant difference in Post test Peak expiratory

    flow rate.

    Hence, by comparing the values of Sputum volume

    between Group A and Group B, Group B showed asignificant difference than Group A. (P

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    7/9

    Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1 111

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    Srm University, Department of Physiotherapy &

    Rc,Department of Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases

    &Rc, Srm Multi-speciality Hospital & Rc,

    Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram. distChennai,Tamil

    Nadu, India.

    Conflict of Interest: None (There is No Objection to

    Anyone For My Study).

    Source of Funding: No Agency or Trust is Sponsered

    for my Study.

    REFERENCES

    1. Nick HT ten Hacken and Thys Vander molen

    (2010); Definition, Diagnosis for Bronchiectasis;

    British Medical Journal, 341:c2766.

    2. Parker R (2001); Description of Bronchiectasis.EurJ of cardiac surgery, 2001, 20:19-24.

    3. Notaranglelo et. al (2010); Causes for Bronchiectasis.

    emedicine specialities Encyclopedia, 06-22.

    4. United states National Heart,Lung,Blood

    Institute(1999); Incidence and prevalence of

    Bronchiectasis.

    5. Joshua o Benditt, (2008); Pathophysiology of

    Bronchiectasis.Merk manual Professional.

    6. Naidich DP, McCauley DI, Khouri NF, Stitik FP,

    Siegelman SS. (1982); Computed tomography in

    the recognition of bronchiectasis. J Comput AssistTomogr ; 6:43.

    7. Mackenzie CF, Shin B, Hadi F, Imle PC. (1980);

    Changes in total lung/thorax compliance

    following chest physiotherapy. Anesth Analg;

    59(3):207-210.

    8. Clarke SW (2005); Effect of Sputum on Pulmonary

    function .Thorax 28:262.

    9. University of California San Francisco, (2009);

    Medical management for Bronchiectasis.

    10. Ethen E Emmons et.al (2010); Physical therapy

    Techniques used for Airway clearance tomaintain the Bronchial Hygiene. emedicine

    specialities Encyclopedia.

    11. Smith M, Ball V (2005); Cashs Text book of

    Cardiovascular Respiratory physiotherapy;

    Elsevier.

    12. Good fellow LT (2002); Bronchial hygiene

    therapy. Am J Nurs, 102, 1, 37-42.

    13. Jones A, Rowe BH. (2000); Bronchopulmonary

    hygiene physical therapy in bronchiectasis and

    chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A

    systematic review. Heart Lung 2000; 29:125-35.

    14. ONeill B, Bradley J, McArdle N, McMahon J

    (2000); The current physiotherapy management

    of patients with bronchiectasis: A UK survey. Int

    J Clin Pract ; 56:3435.

    15. Lannefors L,wollmer P(2002);Mucus Clearance

    with three chest physiotherapy regimes in Cystic

    fibrosis,a comparison to postural drainage, PEPand physical exercise.Eur Respir J 5:748-753 H.

    16. Jamal ali moiz, et al (2007); A comparison of

    Autogenic Drainage and the Active Cycle of

    Breathing Technique in patients with acute

    exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive pulmonary

    disease. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and

    Occupational therapy 2007; vol.1, no.2.

    17. Savci, Sema, Ince Deniz (2000); A comparison of

    Autogenic drainage and Active cycle of

    Breathing Technique in COPD disease. Journal

    of Cardiopulmonary Rehab 20:36-43.18. Syed N (2009); Active cycles of breathing

    technique (ACBT) versus conventional chest

    physical therapy on airway clearance in

    bronchiectasis a crossover tr ial. Adv

    Physiotherapy, 11, 4, 193-8.

    19. Hristara-Papadopoulou,et al (2007);.Results of

    Active cycle of Breathing Technique and

    Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in

    mucociliary clearance in children with Cystic

    Fibrosis.Hippokratia 2007;11,4:202-204.

    20. MC Cool.FD. (2006); Conventional chestphysiotherapy for airway clearance to improve

    Lung mechanics and gas exchange to prevent

    infection. ACCP evidence based clinical practice

    guidelines.

    21. Ashaour M, Al-Kattan K, Rafay MA, Saja KF,

    Hajjar W, Al-Fraye AR.(1999);Current surgical

    therapy for bronchiectasis. World J Surg 1999;

    23:1096- 104.

    22. Annest LS, Kratz JM, Crawford FA Jr. (1982);

    Current results of treatment of bronchiectasis. J

    Thorax Cardiovascular Surg 1982; 83:546-50.

    23. Eaton T (2007); A randomized evaluation of the

    acute efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of

    Flutter and active cycle of breathing with and

    without postural drainage in non-cystic fibrosis

    bronchiectasis. Chron Respir Dis, 4: 23-30.

    24. Oermann CM, Swank PR, Sockrider (2000);

    Validation of an instrument measuring patient

    satisfaction with physiotherapy techniques in

    Cystic fibrosis.

    25. Baldwin (2007); Effect of addition of exercise to

    chest physiotherapy on sputum expectoration

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    8/9

    112 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. January-March 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1

    and lung function in Cystic fibrosis adults. Respir

    Med, 88, 49-53.

    26. Pryor JC (2005); Mucociliary clearance; Key issues

    in Cardio respiratory Physiotherapy.

    27. Janet E. Patterson (2005); Airway Bronchiectasis:

    A Randomized Crossover Trial of Active Cycle

    of Breathing Techniques versus AcapellaClearance in Bronchiectasis Vol. 72, No. 3.

    28. Lapin, Waldes R, Sampson D, Newhouse MT.

    (2002); Effect of chest physiotherapy on the

    removal of mucus in patients with cystic fibrosis.

    Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126:131-135.

    29. W.R.Douma (1997); Mini-Wrights peak flow

    meters are reliable after 5 years.Eur. Resp J;

    457-459.

    30. Sutton PP, Parker RA, Webber BA, Newman SP,

    Garland N, Lopez-Vidriero MT,et al.(1993);

    Assessment of the forced expiration technique

    postural drainage and directed coughing in chestphysiotherapy. Eur J Respir Dis 1993; 64:62-68.

    31. Butler SG, Sutherland RJ (1998); Current airway

    clearance techniques. overview of manual

    techniques, breathing techniques, devices and

    exercise. NZ Med J, 111, 183-6

  • 8/10/2019 ACBT 2014

    9/9

    Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without

    permission.