ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT - CMU Center for Charter Schools€¦ · Grandville Public Schools 34...
Transcript of ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT - CMU Center for Charter Schools€¦ · Grandville Public Schools 34...
ACADEMICPERFORMANCEREPORTWest Michigan Academy of Environmental Science
November 2019
OUR MISSIONTo transform public education through accountability, innovation andaccess to quality education for all students.
OUR VISIONWe envision a diverse and dynamic public education marketplacethat fosters academic excellence for all children.
OUR VALUESIntegrity | Respect | Compassion | InclusivenessSocial Responsibility | Excellence | Innovation
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceTable of Contents
ACADEMY OVERVIEW
4 Demographics
5 Composite Resident District
ACADEMIC
6 Reading Achievement & Growth
8 Math Achievement & Growth
10 Michigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
11 Student Growth
12 Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
14 Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
END NOTES
15 Sources & Citations
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 3
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceDemographics
36%
36%
40%
40%
44%
61%
62%
57%
60%
64%
11%
9%
10%
10%
10%
8%
10%
11%
9%
7%
55%
57%
54%
54%
53%
Studentsof Color
Free/ReducedLunch
SpecialEducation
EnglishLanguageLearner
Enrolled3 or MoreYears
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2018−2019 2017−2018 2016−2017
2015−2016 2014−2015
ENROLLMENT BY SUBGROUP
Fig. D−1
822751741
689661
0
300
600
900
2014
−201
5
2015
−201
6
2016
−201
7
2017
−201
8
2018
−201
9
Stu
dent
s
TOTAL ENROLLMENT BY YEAR
Fig. D−2
3
112
30
49
62
15
40
28
42
26
51
22
41
27
34
19
30
21
32
25
37
15
27
9
20
5
0
50
100
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Stu
dent
s
Students Enrolled 0−2 Years
Students Enrolled 3+ Years
STUDENTS PER GRADE
Fig. D−3
African American
YourSchool
American Indian
CMUAverage
Asian
StateAverage
Hawaiian
Hispanic
Multiracial
White
8.3%
1.7%
1.1%
0.4%
12.3%
12.8%
63.5%
44.9%
0.3%
3.3%
0.0%
3.3%
8.0%
40.1%
17.6%
0.6%
3.5%
0.1%
8.0%
4.2%
66.0%
RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN
Fig. D−4
4 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceComposite Resident District
The Composite Resident District (CRD) illustrates the public school district to which students would be assigned if they were notenrolled in the Academy. Due to geographical constraints, the map may not show all districts.
!(
KentCounty
Allegan County
Newaygo County
MontcalmCounty
OttawaCounty
Muskegon County Grant1
Tri County3
Sparta2
Rockford3Coopersville
21
Kent City4
Hudsonville2
Fruitport2
ForestHills2
Grandville34
KenowaHills111
Allendale17
GrandRapids499
ByronCenter
3Kentwood
14
Jenison3
Muskegon1
Mona Shores1 Northview
5
Wyoming54
ComstockPark19
GodwinHeights
9Kelloggsville
2
East GrandRapids
2
Godfrey-Lee6
!(
0 4 8Miles
West MichiganAcademy of
Environmental Science
!( SchoolStudentPopulation:
Lowest 25%25% - 50%50% - 75%Highest 25%
Student’s Resident District Number of Students Percent of Students
Grand Rapids Public Schools 499 60.7%Kenowa Hills Public Schools 111 13.5%Wyoming Public Schools 54 6.6%Grandville Public Schools 34 4.1%Coopersville Area Public School District 21 2.6%
Comstock Park Public Schools 19 2.3%Allendale Public Schools 17 2.1%Kentwood Public Schools 14 1.7%Godwin Heights Public Schools 9 1.1%Godfrey-Lee Public Schools 6 0.7%
Northview Public Schools 5 0.6%Kent City Community Schools 4 0.5%Byron Center Public Schools 3 0.4%Jenison Public Schools 3 0.4%Rockford Public Schools 3 0.4%
Tri County Area Schools 3 0.4%East Grand Rapids Public Schools 2 0.2%Forest Hills Public Schools 2 0.2%Fruitport Community Schools 2 0.2%Other 11 1.3%
Fig. D-5
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 5
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceReading Achievement
202
210
218
220
225
223
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7 8Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP® SPRING RESULTS − READING ACHIEVEMENT
76%
76% Students Met Target
24% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
69%
69% Students Met Target
31% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
67%
67% Students Met Target
33% Students Did Not Meet Target
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−1
6 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceReading Growth
Grade 3
180
200
220
240
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
180
200
220
240
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Fall Spring
Grade 8
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − READING GROWTH
46%
15%
5%
35%
62
2016−2017
40%
17%3%
40%
56
2017−2018
36%
15%6%
43%
50
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−2
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 7
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceMath Achievement
206
217
225
224
230
234
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7 8Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP SPRING RESULTS − MATH ACHIEVEMENT
65%
65% Students Met Target
35% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
54%
54% Students Met Target
46% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
61%
61% Students Met Target
39% Students Did Not Meet Target
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−3
8 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceMath Growth
Grade 3
180
200
220
240
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
180
200
220
240
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Fall Spring
Grade 8
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − MATH GROWTH
44%
13%5%
38%
58
2016−2017
28%
17%
5%
50% 42
2017−2018
39%
12%4%
44%
53
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−4
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 9
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceMichigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
56.5% 55.2%
46.1%48.0%
50.6% 49.2%
45.3%
48.1%
31.7% 31.7%
31.5% 33.0%
47.3% 46.0%43.9% 44.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
44.2%46.0% 40.8%
42.8%
31.3%
32.7%
32.4% 33.7%
21.5% 23.0%
23.5%24.5%
37.3% 37.9%
37.4% 38.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP MATH
Fig. A−5
10 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceStudent Growth
5951
50 51
4849
454948 48 48 48
50 50 50 50
20
40
60
80
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
54
48 47
53
47
43 45
4746
45 45 46
50 50 5050
20
40
60
80
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
MATH
Fig. A−6
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 11
West Michigan Academy of Environmental SciencePreliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
61.9
%
59.6
%
48.7
%
71.2
%
0%
25%
50%
75%
2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
27.8%
41.4
%
30.0
%
32.7
%
0%
25%
50%
75%
2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 MATH
Fig. A−7
12 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
West Michigan Academy of Environmental SciencePSAT Achievement
51.1
%
58.5
%
68.8
%
66.7
%
62.8
%
64.3
%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
9 10Grade
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
40.0
%
45.3
%
35.4
%
33.3
%
25.6
%
42.9
%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
9 10Grade
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 MATH
Fig. A−8
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 13
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceScholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
61.5%
77.4%69.0%
66.7%62.6%
51.2%
58.9%
54.5%44.1%
42.9%
46.2%
43.6%
60.2%
60.3%
57.8%55.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
42.3%38.7%
44.8%
55.6%
33.9% 26.3%32.0%
27.3%
23.3% 22.1%27.9% 25.9%
36.9%36.8%
36.9% 36.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT MATH
Fig. A−9
14 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
West Michigan Academy of Environmental ScienceSources & Citations
Fig. D-1 CEPI Public Data; Michigan Student Data System (MSDS) fall – UnauditedFig. D-2 CEPI Public DataFig. D-3 MSDS fall – Unaudited; The display of 3+ students in kindergarten and first grade is due to the enrollment date provided in the fall MSDS.Fig. D-4 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. D-5 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-1 NWEA’s MAP: reading – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-2 NWEA’s MAP: reading – springFig. A-3 NWEA’s MAP: math – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-4 NWEA’s MAP: math – springFig. A-5 Spring M-STEP – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-6 Spring MI-Access, M-STEP, PSAT 8, SAT – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-7 Spring PSAT 8 – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-8 Spring PSAT 9 & 10 – Student-levelFig. A-9 Spring SAT – Student-level and Public Data
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 15
THE GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER CENTER FOR CHARTER SCHOOLSCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY | MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48859
(989) 774-2100 | www.TheCenterForCharters.org