The Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System: Pathophysiological ...
Abstract We will use schizophrenia as a case study of computational psychiatry. We first review the...
-
Upload
jared-oliver -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Abstract We will use schizophrenia as a case study of computational psychiatry. We first review the...
Abstract
We will use schizophrenia as a case study of computational psychiatry. We first review the basic phenomenology and pathophysiological theories of schizophrenia. These motivate the choice of a formal or computational framework within which to understand the symptoms and signs of schizophrenia. This framework is the Bayesian brain or Bayesian decision theory. We will focus on the encoding of uncertainty or precision within predictive coding implementations of the Bayesian brain to demonstrate how computational approaches can disclose the nature of hallucinations and delusions. The computational anatomy of psychosis Karl Friston
Computational Psychiatry Course - 29th-30th April 2015Venue: Basement Lecture Theatre, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG
The symptoms and signs of schizophreniaDelusionsFalse beliefsDelusional systems
Hallucinations False percepts
Thought disorder Listening of associationsDisintegration of the psychePsychomotor propertyCognitive deficits
Soft neurological signsAbnormal eye movementsAbnormal mismatch negativity
Bleuler
Dysmorphophobia
Delusional mood
Depersonalisation
Compulsions
Intrusive thoughts
Obsessional beliefs
Affective symptoms
Dissociation syndromes
Capgras syndrome
Functional medical syndromes
Anxiety
Persecutory beliefs
Aberrant beliefs and false inferencePathophysiological and aetiological theoriesDopamine hypothesisAbnormal plasticityAberrant salience
Glutamate hypothesisNMDA receptor dysfunctionAberrant synchrony
GABAergic hypothesisAberrant gain controlAbnormal E-I balanceGenetic
Neurodevelopmental
Psychotomimetic drugs
Psychosocial
AutoimmuneBleuler
Aberrant neuromodulation and synaptic gain control
Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien, 1911: Disintegration of conscious processing (the psyche) Wernicke C. Grundrisse der Psychiatrie. 1906:Sejunction disruption of associative connectivity
Anatomical disconnectionFunctional dysconnection
Dysconnection in schizophrenia: from abnormal synaptic plasticity to failures of self-monitoring. Schizophr Bull. 2009 May;35(3):509-27Klaas E. Stephan, Karl J. Friston and Chris D. Frith
Aberrant neuromodulation and synaptic gain controlWhich computational (formal) framework?Reinforcement learning, optimal control and expected utility theory
Information theory and minimum redundancy
Self-organisation, synergetics and allostasis
Bayesian brain, Bayesian decision theory and predictive coding
PavlovHakenHelmholtz
Barlow
Which computational (formal) framework?Reinforcement learning, optimal control and expected utility theory
Information theory and minimum redundancy
Self-organisation, synergetics and allostasis
Bayesian brain, Bayesian decision theory and predictive coding
PavlovHakenHelmholtz
Barlow
Active inference, predictive coding and precision
Precision and false inference
Simulations of :
Auditory perception (and omission related responses)Smooth pursuit eye movements (under occlusion)Sensory attenuation (and the force matching illusion)
Objects are always imagined as being present in the field of vision as would have to be there in order to produce the same impression on the nervous mechanism - von Helmholtz
Thomas BayesGeoffrey HintonRichard FeynmanFrom the Helmholtz machine to the Bayesian brainRichard Gregory
Hermann von Helmholtz Bayesian filtering and predictive coding
prediction update
prediction error
Making our own sensations
Changing sensationssensations predictionsPrediction errorChanging predictionsActionPerceptionGenerative modelsHidden states
Action
Control states
Continuous statesDiscrete statesBayesian filtering (predictive coding)Variational Bayes(belief updating)
the
DescendingpredictionsAscending prediction errors
whatwhereSensory fluctuations
Hierarchical generative models
frontal eye fieldsgeniculatevisual cortexretinal inputponsoculomotor signals
Prediction error (superficial pyramidal cells)Conditional predictions (deep pyramidal cells)Top-down or backward predictionsBottom-up or forward prediction errorproprioceptive inputreflex arcPerceptionVTA
David MumfordPredictive coding with reflexesAction
Precision
Bayesian belief updating
VTA/SNPrefrontal CortexMotor CortexInferotemporal CortexStriatum
1234050100150200250300350400Simulated (CS & US) responsesPeristimulus time (sec)Rate1234050100150200250300350400Simulated (US) responsesPeristimulus time (sec)Rate
Condition stimulus (CS)Unconditioned stimulus (US)
Perception
Action selection
Incentive salience
Active inference, predictive coding and precision
Precision and false inference
Simulations of :
Auditory perception (and omission related responses)Smooth pursuit eye movements (under occlusion)Sensory attenuation (and the force matching illusion)
+-De-compensation(trait abnormalities)Compensation (to psychotic state)Neuromodulatory failure (of sensory attenuation)Attenuated violation responsesLoss of perceptual GestaltSPEM abnormalitiesPsychomotor povertyResistance to illusionsHallucinationsDelusions
Active inference, predictive coding and precision
Precision and false inference
Simulations of :
Auditory perception (and omission related responses)Smooth pursuit eye movements (under occlusion)Sensory attenuation (and the force matching illusion)
Generative model
SyrinxNeuronal hierarchy Time (sec)Frequency (KHz)sonogram0.511.5
Frequency (Hz)perceptprediction error
Predictive coding500100015002000-6-4-20246810peristimulus time (ms)LFP (micro-volts)
Reduced prior precision
Compensatory attenuation of sensory precision
Omission related responses, MMN and hallucinosis
Active inference, predictive coding and precision
Precision and false inference
Simulations of :
Auditory perception (and omission related responses)Smooth pursuit eye movements (under occlusion)Sensory attenuation (and the force matching illusion)
Generative processGenerative model
retinal inputponsproprioceptive input
Angular position of target in intrinsic coordinatesAngular direction of gaze in extrinsic coordinatesAngular direction of target
timevisual channels
Smooth pursuit eye movements eye (reduced precision)50010001500200025003000-2-1012Angular positiondisplacement (degrees) 50010001500200025003000-20-1001020304050time (ms)velocity (degrees per second)Angular velocity eye target
Eye movements under occlusion and reduced prior precision1002003004005006007008009001000-2-1012target and oculomotor anglestime (ms)displacement (degrees) 1002003004005006007008009001000-30-20-100102030target and oculomotor velocitiestime (ms)velocity (degrees per second) eye (reduced precision) eye target
Paradoxical responses to violations
Active inference, predictive coding and precision
Precision and false inference
Simulations of :
Auditory perception (and omission related responses)Smooth pursuit eye movements (under occlusion)Sensory attenuation (and the force matching illusion)
Generative processGenerative modelMaking your own sensations
25
motor reflex arcthalamussensorimotor cortexprefrontal cortex
ascending prediction errorsdescending modulationdescending predictionsdescending motor predictionsdescending sensory predictions26Sensory attenuation
51015202530-0.500.511.52prediction and errorTime (bins)51015202530-0.500.511.52hidden statesTime (bins)51015202530-0.500.51hidden causesTime (bins)51015202530-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.200.20.40.60.81Time (bins)perturbation and action
Self-made actsFailure of sensory attenuation51015202530-0.500.511.52prediction and errortime51015202530-0.500.511.52hidden statestime51015202530-0.500.51hidden causestime51015202530-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.200.20.40.60.81timeperturbation and actionand psychomotor poverty102030405060-0.500.511.52prediction and errorTime (bins)102030405060-0.500.511.52hidden statesTime (bins)102030405060-0.500.511.52hidden causesTime (bins)102030405060-0.500.511.52Time (bins)perturbation and action102030405060-0.500.511.52hidden statesForce matching illusion102030405060-0.500.511.52prediction and errorTime (bins)Time (bins)Sensory attenuation102030405060-0.500.511.5hidden causesTime (bins)102030405060-0.500.511.5Time (bins)perturbation and actionPerceived as lessReproduced as moreIntrinsic and extrinsic
00.511.522.5300.511.522.53 External (target) forceSelf-generated(matched) forceExternal (target) forceSelf-generated(matched) forceSimulatedEmpirical (Shergill et al)
Compensated failures of sensory attenuationNormal subjectsSchizophrenic subjectsFailure of sensory attenuation and delusions of control102030405060-0.500.511.522.533.5prediction and errorTime (bins)102030405060-0.500.511.522.533.5hidden statesTime (bins)102030405060-1-0.500.511.522.533.5hidden causesTime (bins)102030405060-0.500.511.522.533.5Time (bins)perturbation and action We act by predicting our action to create (attenuated) prediction errors that are suppressed reflexively
A failure of sensory attenuation subverts our predictions and precludes action (psychomotor poverty)
Compensatory increases in prior precision reinstate (unattenuated) prediction errors
Unattenuated prediction errors can only be explained by (antagonistic) external forces (delusions of control and made acts)
A computational account of delusions of agencySigns (of trait abnormalities)Attenuated violation responsesLoss of perceptual GestaltSPEM abnormalitiesPsychomotor povertyResistance to illusions
Symptoms (of psychotic state)HallucinationsDelusions
+-Neuromodulatory failure(of sensory attenuation)Summary
What is the functional deficit?
What is the pathophysiology?
How can we measure it?
What is the aetiology?
What is the intervention?Summary False inference due to aberrant encoding of precisionA neuromodulatory failure of postsynaptic excitability:Aberrant DA/NMDA subunit interactionsAberrant synchronous gain and fast (gamma) dynamicsAberrant cortical gain control and E-I (GABAergic) balanceAberrant dendritic integration (neuro-morphology)Modelling of behaviour and noninvasive brain responsesComputational modelling of choice behaviourComputational fMRIDynamic casual modelling of intrinsic (precision) gain controlAnd thanks to collaborators:
Rick AdamsRyszard AuksztulewiczAndre BastosSven BestmannHarriet BrownJean DaunizeauMark EdwardsChris FrithThomas FitzGeraldXiaosi GuStefan KiebelJames KilnerChristoph MathysJrmie MattoutRosalyn MoranDimitri OgnibeneSasha Ondobaka Will PennyGiovanni PezzuloLisa Quattrocki KnightFrancesco Rigoli Klaas StephanPhilipp Schwartenbeck
And colleagues:
Micah AllenFelix BlankenburgAndy ClarkPeter DayanRay DolanAllan HobsonPaul FletcherPascal FriesGeoffrey HintonJames HopkinsJakob HohwyMateus JoffilyHenry KennedySimon McGregorRead MontagueTobias NolteAnil SethMark SolmsPaul Verschure
And many othersThank you
V5V5V1ITITPCPCVisual inputPrefrontal inputcontrol subjects - predictablecontrol subjects - unpredictableschizophrenia - predictableschizophrenia - unpredictable
V1R V5L V5R ITL ITR PCL PC-2-1.5-1-0.500.511.5cortical sourcelog modulationEffects of predictability on recurrent inhibition control subjectsschizophrenics