Absecon Forcarb Final
-
Upload
casey-ghilardi -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Absecon Forcarb Final
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
1/18
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Samantha AndersonCasey Ghilardi
Vinh Lang
Environmental Issues 4300Spring 2013
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
2/18
1
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Table of ContentsAbstract2
Introduction..2 -3Methods....3 -4
Forest Area Sampling...3-4
Residential Area Sampling..4Analysis4-5Models..4-5
Results..6
Discussion.6-8Sources of Error7-8
Conclusion...8
Sources.9
Appendix..10-17Tables10-11
Figues12-17
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
3/18
2
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Abstract
The city of Absecon, NJ is seeking certification for the Sustainable Jersey program and
the Richard Stockton College Environmental Issues senior level class assessed the amount of
CO2 being emitted by the town in the form of waste, electricity, and transportation. By also
calculating forest carbon sequestration, Absecon can see the differences in emissions and storage
capabilities of the town, and try to remedy the large discrepancy. The forests of Absecon are
currently holding almost 38,000 tons of carbon, but the towns emissions are much greater. This
information may provide Absecon with a new view regarding the management of its natural
resources.
Introduction
Carbon sequestration is a vector in the carbon cycle by which atmospheric carbon (CO2)
is stored in vegetation and soils. Sequestration is variable across the landscape due to vegetative
patterns resulting from land use as well as climate change (often a result of physical and
chemical process variation). Because of the unique ability of terrestrial carbon sequestration to
mitigate carbon emissions into the atmosphere, it is believed that vegetation is an important
resource to evaluate for Absecon.
By taking an inventory of the carbon found within Absecons forests, we will attempt to
create a baseline to evaluate present carbon storage. In establishing this frame of reference, it
will be possible for future studies to quantify the changes in carbon storage as well as rate of
sequestration, which are directly correlated to changes in climate. Also, by investigating
sequestration in an area of various land use, the results could lead to potential amendments of
natural resource use.
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
4/18
3
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Ultimately, the results of our inventory will be compared with other data to verify
whether Absecon is using the resource in an advantageous sustainable manner as compared to
other municipalities, or whether there are ways in which Absecon can implement practices to
increase sustainability and carbon sequestration productivity to achieve a successful threshold.
Methods
Due to the complex nature of forest inventorying within urbanized areas, for purposes of
simplicity and accuracy, forest inventory of the city was stratified into 2 segments, forested land
and residential areas. Forested land was comprised of the larger areas of contiguous forest, and
residential areas consisted of urban and suburban areas where trees are mainly found on
individual lots.
ArcGIS and Google Maps were used to preliminarily identify public parks and other
large forested areas for sampling. Forest acreage was found using the 4100-4300 categories
classified under the Anderson Land Use Classification system of 2007 which included
coniferous, deciduous, and mixed forest types. Similarly, residential areas were classified in the
1100 category of the Classification System, which included high, medium, low, and rural density
units. The city was further subdivided into 6 sampling areas based on the six census block groups
in the town so that each area was equally represented within the samples.
Forest Area Sampling
For forested land, plots were evenly distributed at an interval of five chains (330 feet)
within the previously selected forested areas. Each plot was taken using a basal area factor
(BAF) of 10, and the plot center was assessed to maintain a minimum distance of 1 chain (66
feet) away from any forest edge. For each in tree: species, height, diameter at breast height
(DBH), and condition were recorded. Heights of trees were measured using a Haglof laser
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
5/18
4
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
hypsometer, or a clinometer, and DBH was measured with a diameter tape to the nearest tenth of
an inch.
Residential Area Sampling
Since much of Absecon is developed, a large percentage of trees occur on private
commercial or residential land. To compensate for this, urban and suburban areas were
inventoried using windshield surveys. To begin, random points were distributed within city
limits using an online random point generator. Any block that contained a point was surveyed.
Surveying involved a complete lap around the block and tallying front yard trees by species.
Only native species were included, ornamentals and non-natives were excluded. Average DBH
and height were ocularly estimated for each block. To compensate for not having access to
backyards, all values were doubled under the assumption that the front yards are representative
of the backyards.
Analysis
NED-2 software produced by the US Forest Service was used in analysis which will be
discussed further in the models section of this paper. Inventory data for forest and residential
areas were compiled separately and then expanded out to their respective acreages found in the
2007 Atlantic County Land use/Land cover maps downloaded from the NJ DEP website.
Models
A variety of modeling software packages were implemented and tested. While each had
their own strengths and weaknesses, NED was ultimately chosen for the analysis.
The initial software package utilized was I-Tree from the US Forest Service. This
software package was designed for urban tree inventory and analysis, and can quantify
ecosystem values (US dollars) and amounts. Some problems encountered were overly complex
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
6/18
5
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
interface made data entry difficult, and an extensive list of variables needed for even the most
basic processing made plots too inefficient. Further problems included non-local data processing
which created a time barrier, and analysis of carbon was based around land use allocations.
Explanations of the models used to create carbon estimations were not available.
The next software package tested was NED-2, also from the US Forest Service. NED had
the advantage of being very user friendly in terms of data collection and entry. All variables were
user selected and could be modified to meet any user needs. Carbon estimations are created using
biomass regressions based on the works of Jenkins et al. 2003. For more information, please
refer to the NED manual, which goes into more detail. Another benefit NED had was it allocated
carbon as a function of tree segments (stem, branch, foliage etc.), rather than land use.
After NED, FVS (Forest Vegetation Simulator) was tested. Ease of use and interface was
easier than I-Tree, but more complicated then NED as it requires three separate file types to
access one plot. FVS can model carbon, but further research found that it runs the same model
(biomass regressions based on Jenkins et al 2003) as NED. One distinct benefit of FVS is that it
is comprised of a series of growth models, so it can model a stand as it changes over time. This
stand development can change carbon stocks, which is difficult to account for.
An additional stand-alone model was found called FORCARB. This model was much
more sophisticated and took into account factors such as growth, decay, soil carbon, and much
more. This model was not able to be tested, as the model is very difficult to decipher for
untrained personnel.
NED was chosen as the software to use due to its ease of use, and ability to differentiate
carbon stocks per tree segment rather than land use.
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
7/18
6
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Results
For forested land, carbon storage was found to be 35.88 tons per acre (Table 1), with the
bulk being held in stem wood biomass. Forested land was found to make up 606.71 acres of
Absecon based on the 2007 Atlantic County land use map, which equates to a total of 21,768
tons of carbon held in the towns forestland.
Residential areas were found to have a more modest amount of carbon storage with 11.96
tons per acre, but in terms of area, residential land made up roughly double the area of forest land
for a total of 1296.28 acres. When calculated out, this is equal to a total of 15,506 tons of carbon
stored in trees. Total current carbon storage for residential and forested lands in Absecon is equal
to about 37,274 tons.
Discussion
Some interesting trends emerged from the survey data. As noted in Tables 3 and 4, the
size distribution of trees varied much more in forested land than residential. For residential land,
the trees were mostly larger older oaks, while in the forested areas the size distribution was more
variable. Another unique observation concerning residential carbon is the lack of carbon held in
dead standing/down woody debris. Many people will remove dead property trees, as standing
dead trees can pose health and safety hazards to people and property.
Based on discussions with other groups working on the different aspects of this project, it
was noted that the total amount of carbon that Absecons forests and residential areas are
currently storing is roughly equivalent to the amount of CO2 emissions being released only by
residential electricity use. This means that the amount of CO2 being released by all other aspects
of the town i.e. commercial and residential waste, commercial energy, and transportation cannot
be compensated for by the towns forests.
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
8/18
7
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Sources of Error
While possible biases and sources of error were taken into consideration, there is a
certain amount of error that is unavoidable due to the complexity of the project. All possible
measures were taken to try to minimize controllable error due to sampling design. Determination
of amount currently stored was the objective, as rate of sequestration is difficult to determine.
Growth data is required to infer the rate of sequestration, which requires coring of trees. Since
this project is focused on public and residential lands, coring trees was not possible.
The largest source of error can be attributed to the fact that sampling could not be
performed for a large area of forested land due to property boundaries. Large areas of forested
land to the southwest, while qualifying for sampling, could not be accessed as the land belongs to
Atlantic City Water Supply and is surrounded by a fence. Likewise, residential sampling was
subject to the same difficulties. Private property boundaries must be respected, so trees within
residential plots could not be precisely measured.
Next, forest sampling is not entirely representative for every forest patch in Absecon, as
the forests in the town are heavily fragmented by housing developments, roads, and businesses.
The presence of places such as abandoned farm fields that are extremely overgrown with
secondary successional species such as red cedar, dense mountain laurel, and many non-native
species add error. These areas were vastly different from the usual oak-pine that made up the
majority of the forested areas in the town.
A problem unique to the residential inventory was the construction of new apartment
complexes within the city. While these are still classified under residential land use, the
measurements taken from surveys are not representative of the tree composition of these
developments
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
9/18
8
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Additionally, no commercial areas were surveyed at all. While the presence of trees in
these areas is minimal, it may be beneficial to incorporate these areas in future surveys.
Conclusion
In the event that the town would like to investigate this subject further, it is recommended
that a proper forest and urban tree carbon inventory be carried out by professionals. Additionally,
this report does not incorporate the effects of management decisions on rate or amount of
sequestration. Young seedlings will sequester carbon at a much higher rate due to rapid growth,
and lower density stands will have higher rates of sequestration than dense stands. Therefore it is
suggested that a professional forester be consulted to develop a forest/ urban tree management
plan if maximizing carbon sequestration is a priority for the town.
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
10/18
9
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Sources
GeoMidpoint. (2013).Random point generator. Retrieved from
http://www.geomidpoint.com/random/
NJDEP. (2007, January 1).Anderson land use land cover classification system. Retrieved from
http://www.state.nj.us/dep/gis/digidownload/metadata/lulc02/anderson2002.html
NJDEP. (2013, March 1).Njdep gis data. Retrieved from http://www.nj.gov/dep/gis/lists.html
Twery, M., Knopp, P., Thomasma, S., & Nute, D. (2011, October).Ned-2 user's guide. Retrieved
from http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs85.pdf
Zimmermann, George. (2013). Personal communication.
Zipse, William. (2013). Personal communication.
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
11/18
10
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Appendix
Table 2. Distribution of Carbon within Residential Land
Carbon in tons Live trees Dead trees TOTAL
Foliage Biomass 261 0 261
Stem Wood
Biomass 8,417 0 8,417
Stem Bark
Biomass 1,672 0 1,672
Branch Biomass 2,699 0 2,699
Aboveground
Biomass 13,048 0 13,048
Coarse Root
Biomass 2,458 0 2,458
Total Biomass 15,506 0 15,506
Table 1. Distribution of Carbon within Forested Land
Carbon in tons Live trees Dead trees TOTAL
Foliage Biomass 508 86 594
Stem Wood
Biomass 9,064 1,703 10,767
Stem Bark
Biomass 1,838 378 2,217
Branch Biomass 3,620 975 4,595
Aboveground
Biomass 15,030 3,143 18,174
Coarse Root
Biomass 2,980 614 3,594
Total Biomass 18,011 3,758 21,768
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
12/18
11
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
Table 4. Trees/acre based on DBH and species for forested land
species < 7.00 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 > 23.00
white oak 118.8 16.3 9.3 2.7 0 1.3 0 0 0 0scarlet oak 31 32.3 26.1 3.8 4 0.8 0 0 0 0
pitch pine 9 5.4 5.2 6.4 3.6 3 0.5 0 0 0.3
shortleaf pine 0 7.4 4.1 2.9 3.5 1.3 0 0 0 0
American holly 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 3. Trees/Acre based on DBH and species for residential
Species < 7.00 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 > 23.00
scarlet oak 0 0 0.4 0.3 2.5 2 5.1 0 0 0.2white oak 0 0 0.2 0.6 2.2 2.6 0 0.1 0 0
American holly 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
shortleaf pine 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0 0 0 0
pitch pine 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
13/18
12
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
14/18
13
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
15/18
14
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
16/18
15
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
17/18
16
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ
-
7/28/2019 Absecon Forcarb Final
18/18
17
Forest Carbon Sequestration in Absecon, NJ