AB394 Lincy presentation_updated_6_14_16

Proposed Boundary

Maps to Reorganize

Clark County

School District for

AB 394

Presentation to

City of North Las Vegas

City Council

Presentation by

Robert Lang, Jaewon Lim, &

Magdalena Martinez

Lincy Institute &

College of Urban Affairs, UNLV

June 15, 2016

Nevada Legislature

78th (2015) Session

AB 394: Created an advisory committee and a technical committee to develop a plan to reorganize the Clark County School District and revises certain provisions related to collective bargaining. (BDR 22-900)

An Act relating to education; creating an advisory committee and technical advisory committee for the purpose of developing a plan to reorganize the Clark County School District into certain local school precincts; providing for the membership, compensation and duties of the committees; requiring the State Board of Education to adopt regulations providing for the implementation of the plan; revising provisions related to collecting bargaining, contingent upon implementation of the plan; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

AB 394

Interim Committees

Technical Advisory Committee (Chair: Senator B. Harris)

23 members

8 committee meetings since Nov. 2015

Advisory Committee (Chair: Senator M.

Roberson)

8 State Legislators members

5 committee meetings since Jan. 2016

Will wealthy communities get more

money because of property values?

Nevada is NOT a fiscal home rule state.

Precincts will be administrative not

fiscal structures.

Per pupil funding remains the same

regardless of precinct. Categorical

funding (Zoom, Victory, Title 1) follows

the student, regardless of zip code.

Will precincts create minority, poor and

segregated school?

CCSD is 72% minority and 48%

Free/Reduced Lunch. External experts

have found that there is triple

segregation by race, poverty and

language in many schools.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

30

1 2 3

15

7

13 12

4

14

72

5

Scale: Metropolitan Area & District Size

10 Largest Metros

Largest School Disrtricts

th largest

school

district

Largest metro

area &

school district

Source: NCES, 2013; US Census Bureau, 2015

th largest

metro area

310 302

152

89

4017

Scale: Number of School Boards in States with Population between 2-3 mil

84.9%

Source: NCES, 2015; Education Commission of the States, 2015

School Board Member

to Student Ratio

New York Department of Education

32 community education councils/11 members (2012)

1.1 mil students (2012)

1: 3,125

Chicago Public Schools

5500 seats/local school councils (2000)

396,683 (2015)

1:72

Clark County School District

7 trustees

318,592 students (2014)

1:45,513

Overview of 3 Map Alternatives

Map 1:

Community connectivity

Map 2:

Minimize poverty gap

Map 3:

Minimize racial gap

Organic connectivity based

on municipal boundaries

Balance poverty gap based

on % Federal Free/Reduced

Lunch population

Balance race/ethnicity based

on % African American

population

Henderson: 3

Las Vegas: 2, 5, 6

N Las Vegas: 1, 2, 6

Henderson: 2, 3

Las Vegas: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

N Las Vegas: 1, 5, 6

Henderson: 2, 3

Las Vegas: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6

N Las Vegas: 1, 3, 4, 6

Overall Equity Gaps

11 African American

48 Hispanic

42.7 Free/Reduced Lunch

35 English Language

Overall Equity Gaps

10.4 African American 20

Hispanic


18.2 English Language

Overall Equity Gaps

5.9 African American

37.1 Hispanic


27.2 English Language

Map Alternative One

criterion: create precincts based

on municipal boundaries

and common use shed to take

advantage of organic connectivity

Alt One: Proposed Precincts for CCSD

Municipal Boundaries

Share by Proposed Precincts

Comparison of Shares by Proposed Precincts

Share Comparison

(% Share/Precinct)

Precinct 1

(North LV)

Precinct 2

(SM-Para)

Precinct 3

(Hen-BC)

Precinct 4

(SV-Enter)

Precinct 5

(LV South)

Precinct 6

(LV North)CCSD Avg.

Number of Elementary Schools 34 43 32 18 31 38 196

Share-African American Students 17.3% 10.5% 6.3% 10.8% 9.6% 14.7% 11.7%

Share-Hispanic Students 52.2% 71.1% 29.1% 23.1% 42.5% 37.0% 45.6%

Share-AA+HISP Students 69.5% 81.6% 35.4% 33.8% 52.1% 51.7% 57.2%

Share-FRL Students 62.6% 75.7% 36.4% 33.0% 48.6% 46.5% 53.3%

Share-ELL Students 29.7% 44.7% 9.6% 12.7% 27.2% 16.9% 25.5%

Ratio of Share

(Precinct to CCSD)

Precinct 1

(North LV)

Precinct 2

(SM-Para)

Precinct 3

(Hen-BC)

Precinct 4

(SV-Enter)

Precinct 5

(LV South)

Precinct 6

(LV North)CCSD Avg.







Source: InSite Education Financial Data for CCSD, 2013

Gap between Highest & Lowest Shares

Precinct Profile

African American Hispanic AA+Hispanic FRL ELL

Share (%) Precinct Share (%) Precinct Share (%) Precinct Share (%) Precinct Share (%) Precinct

Highest 17.3 1 71.1 2 81.6 2 75.7 2 44.7 2

Lowest 6.3 3 23.1 4 33.8 4 33.0 4 9.6 3

Gap 11.0 48.0 47.8 42.7 35.0

PrecinctPrecinct 1

(North LV)

Precinct 2

(SM-Para)

Precinct 3

(Hen-BC)

Precinct 4

(SV-Enter)

Precinct 5

(LV South)

Precinct 6

(LV North)

CCSD

Total

Number of Schools

Elementary 38 48 35 20 34 42 217

E.S. Students 25,304 33,873 23,329 15,899 22,220 26,042 146,667

Middle 8 13 11 7 7 10 56

M.S. Students 10,487 16,313 13,982 8,156 8,156 12,817 69,911

High 7 10 12 5 6 10 50

H.S. Students 12,576 16,170 21,559 8,983 10,780 17,966 88,034

Number of Total Students 48,367 66,356 58,870 33,038 41,156 56,825 304,612

Map Alternative Two

criterion: create precincts based on distribution of

Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL) share of students to

minimize concentration of poverty in any one precinct

Alt Two: Proposed Precincts for CCSD

Free/Reduced Lunch



Share Comparison

(% Share/Precinct)Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 CCSD Avg.







Ratio of Share

(Precinct to CCSD)Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 CCSD Avg.








Precinct Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6CCSD

Total

Number of Schools

Elementary 37 42 35 30 32 41 217

E.S. Students 25,304 33,873 23,329 15,899 22,220 26,042 146,667

Middle 9 15 9 8 6 9 56

M.S. Students 11,652 18,642 10,487 10,487 6,991 11,652 69,911

High 9 13 9 7 6 6 50

H.S. Students 16,170 21,558 16,170 12,576 10,780 10,780 88,034



Precinct Profile



Highest 17.2 1 53.2 3 64.2 6 59.7 2 32.1 5

Lowest 6.8 3 33.1 1 46.7 4 42.1 1 13.9 1

Gap 10.4 20.0 17.6 17.6 18.2

Map Alternative Three

criterion: create precincts based on distribution of

African American share of students to minimize

concentration of race/ethnicity in any one

precinct

Alt Three: Proposed Precincts for CCSD

Race/Ethnicity



Share Comparison








Ratio of Share

(Precinct to CCSD)Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6

CCSD

Avg.









Precinct Profile



Highest 14.5 1 64.7 2 74.1 2 70.9 2 37.8 2

Lowest 8.6 3 27.6 6 39.9 4 36.4 6 10.6 6

Gap 5.9 37.1 34.2 34.5 27.2

Precinct Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6CCSD

Total

Number of Schools

Elementary 35 35 38 39 35 35 217

E.S. Students 24,832 23,579 26,318 27,024 22,670 22,244 146,667

Middle 8 11 10 10 6 11 56

M.S. Students 10,487 13,982 12,817 11,652 6,991 13,982 69,911

High 8 8 9 9 6 10 50

H.S. Students 14,373 14,373 16,169 14,373 10,780 17,966 88,034


Current CCSD Compared to

Alt Map Two (Free/Reduced Lunch)

Current CCSD Structure

Alt Map Two Proposed Precincts

Share Comparison

(% Share/Precinct)District A District B District C District D District E District F District G






Sources: NV LCB Testimony, CCSD GIS GeoStudent File SY2014, Schools Enrolled;

InSite Education Financial Data for CCSD, 2013

Share Comparison


Number of Elementary Schools 33 38 32 27 29 37





Triple Segregation

Overview of Number of Students by

Precinct based on Alt Maps

Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6

Alt Map

One48,367 66,356 58,870 33,038 41,156 56,825

Alt Map

Two53,126 74,073 49,986 38,962 39,991 48,474

Alt Map

Three49,692 51,934 55,304 53,049 40,441 54,192

Precincts: AB 394 Mandate

For Southern NevadaOne Example

CCSD

Superintendent

Precinct 1

Empowerment Schools

Precinct 2

Empowerment Schools

Precinct 3

Empowerment Schools

Precinct 4

Empowerment Schools

Precinct 5

Empowerment Schools

Precinct 6

Empowerment Schools

6 Appointed

from Precincts to

Countywide Board

1 at Large

Appointed to Countywide Board

Precinct membership: 7 members appointed by suggested body based on stakeholder recommendations

Precinct board member

to student ratio 1:7,585

Recommendations

Use GIS and student data to shape policy

discussions and recommendations related to

AB 394

Move to reflect national practices and align

metropolitan and precinct size

Identify criterion to draw precincts and fulfill

intent of AB 394

Consider precinct boards and define roles

and responsibilities

AB394 Lincy presentation_updated_6_14_16

Education

Transcript of AB394 Lincy presentation_updated_6_14_16