AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009
description
Transcript of AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009
AASHTO – SCOPM
Palm Desert, California
October 23, 2009
Mn/DOT Performance Management - Setting our Direction
2
What we are aiming to achieve Mn/DOT Strategic Directions
• Safety
• Mobility
• Leadership
• Innovation – Promote a culture of innovation
• Transparency – Build public trust in Mn/DOT
3
What we are aiming to achieve
Mn/DOT Goals for Performance Management
Goal 1. Use measures in plans and operations to focus on results
Goal 2. Innovation and Leadership – Be a leader in innovation to get more performance results with available resources
Goal 3. Accountability – Focus Mn/DOT on results with regular performance reporting
Goal 4. Transparency – Build public trust by sharing information.
Goal 1. Use measures and targets in our transportation plans, our
program, and our operations as a guide for investment decisions
to yield clear results for Minnesota –
balanced with community and stakeholder input
5
Statewide 20 Yr. Transportation Plan - Some Guiding Principles
• Performance measures
• Community – environment sensitive solutions
• Partnerships - to get more results
• Innovation
• New cost-effective approaches
6
Statewide Transportation Plan Ten Policy Goals – Each with Measures to
Guide Decisions and Track Progress
1. Traveler Safety – Fatalities and Serious Injuries
6. Twin Cities Mobility – Incident Clearance Time
2. Infrastructure Preservation – Bridge & Pave. Condition
7. Greater MN Mobility – Bus Service Hours
3. Maintenance – Hours to Clear Snow & Ice
8. Community Development – ADA Accessibility
4. Nat’l- Global Connections – Nonstop Air Destinations
9. Energy and Environment – Mn/DOT Use of Cleaner Fuels
5. Statewide Connections – Travel Speed
10. Accountability–Transparency– Projects Bid on Schedule
7
Measures Guide District Investment Plans and Project Selection
• Statewide measures and targets set desired service levels
• Measures show where we need to improve
• We weigh benefits and costs of strategy options
• Districts make final decisions in community context Cable median reduces
fatalities at a moderate cost
8
Statewide Plan Example
Infrastructure PreservationMeasures • Bridge structural condition• Pavement Ride Quality• Drain pipes condition Strategies
• Bridges – The 2009-2018 legislative bonding program will reduce “Poor” bridges to the 2% performance target
• Pavements - Work to close gap to targets …while minimizing life-cycle costs
• Invest systematically in other infrastructure – example - drainage…
9
Pavement Preservation
Materials Office Recommends
Where, How, and When to Invest Cost-Effectively
• Ride Quality measure is mapped Green, Yellow, Red for current condition. It is also predicted for future years
• In Central MN District 3, 2.5% of pavements are “Poor” - close to the target of 2.5%
10
Greater Minnesota Transit Plan Goals and Measures
Goals• Maintain viability of existing
systems• Provide service in unserved
areas• Expand in underserved areasMeasure • Bus service hours provided vs.
service hours neededTarget• Meet 80% of hours needed
0.92 0.93 0.95
1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
0.96
0.930.910.87
0.870.93
0.981.03
1.091.14
1.191.24
1.301.35
1.40
1.501.45
0.50
1.00
1.50
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Calendar Year
Serv
ice H
ours
2010 Target80% of Need Met
Source: Mn/DOT Office of Transit
2007
Tar
get
2006
Tar
get
Projected 2008-12
12-2008
11
Aviation System Plan
Goal – Provide cost-effective transportation options for people and freight
Performance Target90 % of Minnesotans are within 20 miles of a paved and lighted airport.
Status - 96% population within 20 miles (111 airports)
12
20-Year Highway Investment Plan Measures Help Tell us the Funds Needed to
Meet Performance Targets
Investment Plan Process1. Identify investments needed to meet all targets – for Safety,
Infrastructure, Mobility – and Community Priorities = $65 B2. Project revenues available for 20 years = $15 B3. Set investment goals for a balanced program of Safety,
Infrastructure Preservation, Mobility and Community Priorities - based on measures, legislative direction, and stakeholders input
4. Develop district plans – for expected revenue of $15 B5. Identify high priority options if we receive more dollars = $2.5 B
13
2009-2028 Projected Revenue for State Highways: $15 B
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2009 2019
State Fiscal Year
Co
ns
tru
cti
on
Ex
pe
nd
itu
res
(M
illi
on
s o
f D
oll
ars
)
State Funds
Federal Funds
Chapter 152 Bridge Bond Funds
Chapter 152 Other Bond Funds
2028
Buying Power of the SRC
14
Challenge – How to Address Unfunded Performance Needs?
Gas Tax Scenario• Raising just $2.5 B over 10 years would take a 12.5 cents gas tax hike
Mn/DOT Strategies– To get more results with limited resources
1. Practical Design - Employ high-benefit, low-cost strategies
2. Re-assess approach to Twin Cities congestion – “Right Size” vision
• Optimize existing system use with transit and strategic spot highway capacity improvements
3. Innovative finance and partnership investments
Goal 2. Innovation and Leadership – Find new ways to finance, design, and deliver projects and services - To get more performance results with available resources;- To leverage more resources- To manage demand (pricing)
16
Innovation and Partnerships Improve Results toward Targets and Address Community Needs
Examples of Strategies
• Context Sensitive Solutions – Practical Design
• Complete Streets
• Towards Zero Death Coalitions – state and regional
17
Innovation and Partnerships Safety
Measure• Fatalities and serious injuries -
all modesStrategies for state and local roads• Toward Zero Deaths Coalition –
– state, local, private• “Four E” approach = partnerships• System-wide, cost-effective
enhancements – Rumble strips, rumble stripes,
cable-median, intersection lighting…
Centerline rumble strips reduce fatalities cost-
effectively
18
Results - Road Fatalities Down 200 in 6 YearsNew Target - Reduce to 400 by 2010
568
655
559
510
455
650 657
494
597576
600 626
625
567
Base Year594
2008 Target500
2010 Target400
200
300
400
500
600
700
80019
95
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Reduce Fatalities less than 10 per year
Reduce Fatalities by 10 to 30 per year
SHSP Target 2008
Annual Fatalities
3-Year Average
TST Data February 18, 2009
19
Statewide Transportation Plan
Twin Cities Mobility
Measures – Congestion, Incident Clearance, Transit Use
Strategies• Innovate to move more people on existing systems
– Example: Urban Partnership Agreement• Use strategic, cost-effective spot highway improvements that
support the economy and planned growth• Work with Metropolitan Council to implement their 2030 Transit
Master Study • Support increased walking and bicycling.
20
The % of Twin Cities Freeways Congested was Reduced 3 of the last 4 years – to 17.3%
% of Miles of Twin City Urban Freeway System Congested
12.3%
10.1%11.0%
15.1%17.3%18.3%
16.9%
14.7%
13.5%
12.7%
18.1%19.2%
19.7%
20.8%21.3% 20.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
19
93
19
98
20
03
20
08
20
13
20
18
20
23
20
28
% o
f C
on
ge
ste
d D
ire
cti
on
al
Mil
es
Historical Data
Source: Regional Transportation Management Center
During Ramp Meter Shutdown
2030 Projections
20
08
Sc
ore
During I-35W Bridge Construction
Since 1993 Trend
10 Year Trend
5 Year Trend
21
Innovation
Urban Partnership Agreement
• Transit – BRT, managed lanes and shoulders
• Road Pricing – Mn/Pass
• Technology
• Telecommuting
Goal 3. Accountability – Focus Mn/DOT managers and staff on results with regularly scheduled
performance reports
23
Management Performance Report Schedule 2009
Month Topic
January Program Delivery
March Annual Transportation Scorecard
April Bridge Inspection & Maintenance
August Highway Operations & Maintenance
September Workforce – Human Capital
October Highway Infrastructure: Safety, Preservation. Mobility, Community Improvement
24
The % of State Pavements in “Poor” Condition is Growing
Principal Arterials
2.4%
1.3%
2.6% 2.7%3.4%
5.1%
2.6%2.3%
1.3%0.7%
2.0%1.5%
2.6%
4.9%4.7%4.1%
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Calendar Year
Poor Target = 2%
Source: Mn/DOT Office of Materials01-21-09
* Predicted
* Predicted based on 2009-2012 STIP and CH152 Bonding Projects
5%
2%
25
The % Bridges in Poor Condition was Reduced to New Low of 3.1% in 2007Structurally Deficient Bridges, Principal Arterials
2008 – Improvement resulted from higher investment
3.6%3.2%3.1%
4.2%4.4%4.1%
3.9%3.7%
4.6%4.1% 3.9%4.2%
3.1%
0%
5%
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
Calendar Year
% o
f S
q.
Ft.
Poor Target = 2%
Source: Mn/DOT Bridge Office2-23-09 * Predicted based on 2009-2012 STIP incl. CH 152
* P
red
icte
d
26
Maintenance and OperationsMeasures – Snow and Ice,
Pavement Markings, Fleet, Customer Satisfaction
Targets – Define desired service levels and inform budget
Targets levels are informed by customer research – as well as safety, engineering, and cost-effectiveness
27
Customer Satisfaction Exceeds Target for Snow & Ice Removal
7.8
7.3
7.67.4 7.4
7.47.5
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008
Mea
n R
atin
g
7.0
Po
sitiveN
eutral
Goal 4. Transparency – Build Public Trust in Mn/DOT
29
New Annual Public Report
and Scorecard May 2009
• 11 key measures for 7 goals
• To legislators
• Mn/DOT web home page
• First step in more transparency for results
30
2008 Transportation Results Scorecard
31
What Have we Achieved with Performance Managment?
• Accountability – Managers know their targets, where they stand today, key strategies, and budget tradeoffs across measures. Results have improved for some key areas.
• Balance in Decisions – We are still defining how to balance performance with other factors in decision-making – our transportation vision, community, environment, quality of life, economic competitiveness – some of which are currently less measurable.
32
Download plans at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/planning/stateplan/index.htm
See 2008 performance report at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/measures/performancereports.html
Statewide Plan Contact:Peggy ReichertDirector, Statewide PlanningOffice of Investment [email protected]
Performance Measures Contact:Mark C. LarsonDirector, Performance MeasuresOffice of Investment Management651-366-3762markc.larson@ dot.state.mn.us