AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012. Divestment issues “Divestment,” in the parlance of the...
-
Upload
derek-bradley -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012. Divestment issues “Divestment,” in the parlance of the...
NSF/AST Additional Material
AAAC
Jim Ulvestad
December 1, 2012
Divestment issues “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies
removal of a telescope from the NSF AST budget. This encompasses many options, all of which are likely to reduce or eliminate open-access astronomy research time1. Divest to another operator, possibly with another mission
2. Develop funding partnership, possibly with mix of missions
3. Mothball
4. Close/deconstruct
Timescale for divestment decisions advertised as late 2013, to enable savings by time of FY 2017
Consideration of interagency partnerships follows various mixes of options 1 and 2 above Strategy: interagency discussions about options/needs. If the other
agency has interest, explore range of possible partnership models. Within agencies, determine how choices will be made among options.
212/01/2012
OIR System Definition Long-term directions inferred from Portfolio Review Report
LSST should be at heart of OIR system OIR system should center on >4m telescopes, with 4m
telescopes being used primarily as supporting capabilities or survey capabilities
This leads to many questions What does the post-2021 system look like, as a whole? How do you make a transition to that system, and make the transition
while continuing to deliver science capabilities along the way? What are the opportunities to motivate private telescope operators to
participate in an integrated system? How much of the system is defined top-down vs. on a more ad-hoc
bottom-up basis? How is the system coordinated and managed? How do Gemini and NOAO change over the next decade?
312/01/2012
Moving Toward the OIR System Community self-organizing in workshops and other venues to
determine best methods of doing LSST science NSF and DOE discussing how DOE mission goals might be
achieved using telescopes in the NSF part of the system Given “Rocky-III” report, DOE has an idea of where the gaps are
in their integrated program Need community-led assessment of what we really want the
system to look like post-2020 to deliver DOE mission science and NSF investigator science Which telescopes, instruments, and observing methods best
deliver the overall science capabilities and return?
412/01/2012