A Typology of Efficiency in Health Care: Implications for Measurement Paul G. Shekelle, M.D., Ph.D....
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of A Typology of Efficiency in Health Care: Implications for Measurement Paul G. Shekelle, M.D., Ph.D....
A Typology of Efficiency in Health Care:Implications for Measurement
Paul G. Shekelle, M.D., Ph.D.December 4, 2006
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-2 10/06/06
Project Overview
• AHRQ-funded project began in October 2005
• Three major tasks:
– Create a typology of efficiency
– Scan and review literature on efficiency
– Evaluate existing measures of efficiency
• Final report due February 2007
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-3 10/06/06
Overview of Talk
• Highlight motivation for current work
• Present RAND’s typology
• Review existing measures
• Examples
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-4 10/06/06
Measuring Efficiency
• Tremendous pressure exists from various stakeholders to measure “efficiency”
– Concern about rising health care costs– Variability in intensity of resource use not
associated with better processes and outcomes• Little is known about how well available metrics
capture the quantities of interest– Considerable lack of common language,
conceptual clarity• Little is known about the consequences (intended
and unintended) of applying those metrics at different levels in the system
• How is efficiency established in an environment with mixed payment methods?
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-5 10/06/06
Many Fortune 50 Companies Are Demanding Cost and Quality Metrics on Physicians
High/Low High/High
Low/Low Low/High
Efficient
Effective
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-6 10/06/06
Overview of Talk
• Highlight motivation for current work
• Present RAND’s typology
• Review existing measures
• Examples
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-7 10/06/06
Efficiency Measures Typology Overview
1. Perspective
2. Output
3. Type of Efficiency
Who is asking what about whom, and why?
What is being produced?
What is the root cause of inefficiency? What are the
inputs to output?
Typology is organized in three tiers
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-8 10/06/06
Perspective
• We identify several potential points of view:– Health care “firms”
• Providers• Health plans• Purchasers
– Individuals– Society
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-9 10/06/06
Context Matters in Efficiency Measurement
StakeholderPrimary Fiduciary
ResponsibilityTypical Time Period
Physician Active patients in a panelAs long as responsible for
patient
HospitalPatients who are
admittedDuring hospital stay
Health Plan Enrollees Renewed annually
EmployerEmployees and covered
dependentsLength of employment
Society All residents Unlimited
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-10 10/06/06
Output: What’s Being Produced?
• We are interested in evaluating the efficiency with which particular health care products (outputs) are “manufactured”
• Being explicit about the output is critical (and often not done)
• We define two major categories of outputs:– Services– Health outcomes
• Producers (firms) define outputs– Financial flows (what is being sold) influence
definitions
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-11 10/06/06
Examples of Outputs by Type
Health Care Firm (Producer)
Service Output Examples
Health Outcome Output Examples
Physician
•Visits
•Procedures
•Diagnoses
•Prescriptions
•Preventable deaths
•Quality adjusted life years
Hospital
•Discharges
•Procedures
•Inpatient days
•Functional status
•Preventable deaths
•Preventable complications
Health Plan •Covered lives•Quality adjusted life years
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-12 10/06/06
Types of Efficiency
• Within the context of perspective and outputs, we identify three major types of efficiency:– Technical– Productive– Social
• Social efficiency is more often the focus for society than for firms
Applies primarily to firms
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-13 10/06/06
Technical Efficiency
A firm achieves technical efficiency when it cannot produce the same output with any fewer inputs
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-14 10/06/06
Productive Efficiency
A firm achieves productive efficiency when it cannot produce the same output at a lower cost
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-15 10/06/06
Technical and Productive Efficiency MeasuresPoint to Different Root Causes of Efficiency
Technical Efficiency
Inputs are put to good use
Productive Efficiency
Inputs are put to good use
Best mix of inputs chosen
Lowest prices are paid
+
+
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-16 10/06/06
Example: Technical vs. Productive Efficiency
• Technical Efficiency
– Hospital A has a good CPOE system and staff are able to use it well
– Hospital B has a CPOE system but it is difficult to use; staff follow old order entry process, but now with the extra step of computer entry
Hospital A has higher technical efficiency than Hospital B
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-17 10/06/06
Example: Technical vs. Productive Efficiency
• Productive Efficiency
– Hospital A bought a CPOE system, Hospital B did not; Hospital A now turns around orders more quickly
– Hospital A and Hospital C both bought a CPOE system, but Hospital A got a better deal
Hospital A has higher productive efficiency than Hospitals B and C
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-18 10/06/06
Social Efficiency
• Social efficiency is achieved when no member of society can be made better off without making another member worse off
– Giving more resources to one person implies that those resources have been taken away from someone else
– Appeal of “waste” is the notion that those resources do not benefit anyone currently
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-19 10/06/06
What should be our third tier?
• The concepts of technical v. productive efficiency resonates well with economists, but resonates less well with others
• We are exploring an alternative third tier that looks at the types of inputs rather than the technical v. productive concept
• In the alternative version, the approach to measuring the input used will affect the conclusions that can be drawn about how to improve efficiency
• Inputs could be characterized as costs, resource counts, costs using standardized prices, etc.
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-20 10/06/06
What about Quality?
• What role should the quality of the output play in a measure of efficiency?
• Some have proposed that any efficiency measure must include a measure of quality
• We favor keeping efficiency separate from quality:– Inputs for certain health care processes share
conceptual and measurement features– Metric to measure the quality of the output can
vary greatly – the example of surgery– Common use of these terms in the US separate
efficiency and quality
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-21 10/06/06
RAND’s Efficiency Typology
Society
Providers PurchasersHealth Plans
Health Care Firms
Individuals
Services Health Outcomes
Technical Productive Social
Per
spec
tive
Out
put
Typ
e
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-22 10/06/06
Overview of Talk
• Highlight motivation for current work
• Present RAND’s typology
• Review existing measures
• Examples
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-23 10/06/06
Hospital Efficiency Dominates Peer-Reviewed Literature
0 20 40 60 80 100
Focus/unit
Number of articles
Hospital
Physician
Health plan
Nurse
Medicare
Area
Other
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-24 10/06/06
Econometric Analyses Dominate Measures in Peer-Reviewed Literature
0 50 100 150 200
Type of article
Number of articles
Review/meta-analysis Method developmentDescriptive Econometric analysis
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-25 10/06/06
Typical Measure from Peer-Reviewed Literature
• Cit = f (Yit , Pit , β) + ui + vit
• C is total costs
• Y is outputs– Hospital discharges and outpatient visits
• P is inputs– Capital costs and wages
• Estimated using stochastic frontier analysis
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-26 10/06/06
Different Worlds of Efficiency Measures
• There is an almost total separation between the published studies of health care efficiency and the use of efficiency measures by providers, payers, and purchasers
• Measures in use generally developed by vendors
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-27 10/06/06
Vendor-Developed Measures
• Episode-based: ETGs, MEGs, CRGs
– Claims grouped into episodes and attributed to physicians
– Measure is cost per episode (productive efficiency)
– Also can look at resource use per episode (technical efficiency)
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-28 10/06/06
Vendor-Developed Measures
• Population-based: ACGs, DxCGs
– Patient populations weighted by morbidity burden
– Measure is cost per risk-adjusted patient per year (productive efficiency)
– Also can look at resource use (technical efficiency)
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-29 10/06/06
Conclusions from Review of Measures
• Total disconnect between efficiency measurement by academics and vendors
– Less consensus efficiency measures than quality measures
• Little analysis of scientific soundness of measures
• Almost all measures use services as outputs
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-30 10/06/06
Overview of Talk
• Highlight motivation for current work
• Present RAND’s typology
• Review existing measures
• Examples
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-31 10/06/06
Efficiency of Lasik Surgeons
MD1 MD2 MD3
Input (per procedure)
RN Labor 1 hour 45 minutes 45 minutes
RN Cost $40/hour $40/hour $40/hour
Anesthesia 40cc 40cc 40cc
Anesthesia cost $0.10/cc $0.10/cc $0.05/cc
Total input cost $44 $34 $32
Output (total)
Lasik Procedures 8/day 8/day 8/day
Visual Functioning +10 points +10 points +10 points
Patient Experience 89 89 89
MD2 and MD3 more technically efficiency than MD1MD3 also more productively efficient than MD1 and MD2
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-32 10/06/06
Conclusion
• Disconnect between academic world and vendors on efficiency measurement
• Not the same level of consensus as seen on quality measures
– Limited understanding of economics by non-economists
– Lack of research on scientific soundness of measures
– Lack of actionable measures
HusseyEfficiencyAMA-33 10/06/06
Some Challenges Ahead
• Important to be explicit about the perspective, output, and type of efficiency
– Not currently done systematically
• Important to develop measures to fill gaps
– Account for quality and outcomes of care
– Social efficiency
• Important to evaluate efficiency measures for scientific soundness, usability, etc.
• We need agreement on the role the quality of the output should play in a measure of efficiency