A tics Meta-Analysis of Differ en Ti Ally Expressed Genes in Colorectal Cancer

download A tics Meta-Analysis of Differ en Ti Ally Expressed Genes in Colorectal Cancer

of 109

Transcript of A tics Meta-Analysis of Differ en Ti Ally Expressed Genes in Colorectal Cancer

  • 8/8/2019 A tics Meta-Analysis of Differ en Ti Ally Expressed Genes in Colorectal Cancer

    1/109

    A BIOINFORMATICS META-ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED

    GENES IN COLORECTAL CANCER

    by

    SIMON KIT CHAN

    B.Sc. First Class Honours, Cell and Molecular Biology,

    Simon Fraser University, 2005

    A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS

    FOR THE DEGREE OF

    MASTER OF SCIENCE

    in

    THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES

    (Bioinformatics)

    THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

    December 2007

    Simon Kit Chan, 2007

  • 8/8/2019 A tics Meta-Analysis of Differ en Ti Ally Expressed Genes in Colorectal Cancer

    2/109

    ii

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Elucidation of candidate colorectal cancer biomarkers often

    begins by comparing the expression profiles of cancerous and normal tissue by

    performing high throughput gene expression profiling. While many such studies

    have been performed, the resulting lists of differentially expressed genes tend to

    be inconsistent with each other, suggesting that there are some false positives

    and negatives. One logical solution to this problem is to determine the

    intersection of the lists of differentially expressed genes from independent

    studies. It is expected that genes that are biologically relevant to cancer

    tumorigenesis will be reported most often, while sporadically reported genes are

    due to the inherent biases and limitations of each of the profiling platforms used.

    However, the statistical significance of the observed intersection among many

    independent studies is usually not considered. PURPOSE: To address these

    issues, we developed a computational meta-analysis method that ranked

    differentially expressed genes based on the following criteria, which are

    presented in order of importance: the amount of intersection among studies, total

    tissue sample sizes, and average fold change in expression. We applied this

    meta-analysis method to 25 independent colorectal cancer profiling studies that

    compared cancer versus normal, adenoma versus normal, and cancer versus

    adenoma tissues. RESULTS: We observed that some genes were consistently

    reported as differentially expressed with a statistically significant frequency (P