A Thermo-Gas-Dynamic Model for the Bifurcation Analysis of ...
Transcript of A Thermo-Gas-Dynamic Model for the Bifurcation Analysis of ...
Leeds–Lyon Symposium on TribologySeptember 2–4, 2019, Lyon, France
A Thermo-Gas-Dynamic Model for the Bifurcation Analysisof Refrigerant-Lubricated Gas Foil Bearing Rotor Systems
Tim Leister (KIT/INSA), Benyebka Bou-Saïd (INSA), Wolfgang Seemann (KIT)
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu
Self-Acting Gas Foil Bearings (GFBs)Bump foilTop foil
Bearing sleeveRotor journal
Gasdynamiclubrication wedge
Source: rotorlab.tamu.edu/tribgroup/Proj_GasFoilB.htm (adapted) Source: archive.org/details/C-2007-1879
High-speed rotor supported by gasdynamic lubrication wedge
Oil-free machinery offers high energy efficiency and low wear
Application: Vapor-Compression Refrigeration
Condenser
Evaporator
MotorTurb. Comp.
GFB
Heat absorbedfrom cabin
Heat expelledto environment
Hotvapor
Warmvapor
Liquid
Coldmixture(vapor–liquid)
GFB
R-245fa
System optimized by using refrigerant as lubricating fluid
Challenge: Self-Excited Vibrations
Stationary operating pointstend to become unstable atelevated rotational speeds
Occurrence of self-excitedrotor vibrations with largeamplitudes (fluid whirl)
ωc > ω2 (Loss of Stability)
ω1
ω2 > ω1
Vibrations calmed down by deliberately introduced friction
Stationary operation:Static bump deflection
Moderate excitation:Stiction predominant
Strong excitation:Dissipative sliding
Refrigerant R-245fa C C C FH
F
H
H
FF
F
(1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane)
Vapor pressure 1.23 bar at 20 ◦C
50 100 150 200 2500.51.0
1.52.0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Pre
ssur
eP=
p /p 0
P, D, T SurfaceSat. Vapor LineSat. Liquid Line
Reg. PR EoSCub. PR EoSCritical Point
Density D = ρ/ρ0
Temp. T=
ϑ/ϑ0
Pre
ssur
eP=
p /p 0
T=
1.37
T=
1.46
T=
1.55
Cubic Peng–Robinson equation of state (PR EoS)
PPR(D, T)
=1p0
Rmϑ0T(Mmρ0D
)− b− a(ϑ0T)(Mm
ρ0D
)2+ 2b
(Mmρ0D
)− b2
Equilibrium vapor pressure (coexistence curve)by fitting simplified Clausius–Clapeyron solution
Psat(T) = exp(
C0− C1T−1− C2 ln T)
Regularization of PR EoS by algebraic solutionof cubic equation PPR(D, T) = Psat(T)with roots Dv(T) < Dm(T) < Dl(T)Mass fraction of liquid
Wl(D, T) =D− Dv(T)
Dl(T)− Dv(T)
Fluid film thickness
H(ϕ, τ) =
Clearance
1
Structure deformation
−Q(ϕ, τ)
Rotor journal displacement
− ε(τ) cos[
ϕ− γ(τ)]
Reynolds equation
∂
∂τ(DH) +
Couette flow
Λ2
∂
∂ϕ(DH) =
Poiseuille flow
∂
∂ϕ
(DH3
2V∂P∂ϕ
)+ κ2 ∂
∂Z
(DH3
2V∂P∂Z
)Energy equation
ΘcpDH2
[∂T∂τ
+∂T∂ϕ
(Λ2− H2
2V∂P∂ϕ
)+ κ2∂T
∂Z
(−H2
2V∂P∂Z
)]
= ΘαTH2
[∂P∂τ
+∂P∂ϕ
(Λ2− H2
2V∂P∂ϕ
)+ κ2∂P
∂Z
(−H2
2V∂P∂Z
)]
+ 2V
[Λ2
12+
H4
4V2
(∂P∂ϕ
)2+ κ2 H4
4V2
(∂P∂Z
)2]
Viscous dissipation
+ 2ΘkH(Ta− T)
Heat transfer
FluidDynamics
P(ϕ, Z, τ)
StructureDynamicsQ(ϕ, τ),
Q′(ϕ, τ)
RotorDynamics
ε(τ), ε′(τ),
γ(τ), γ′(τ)
FluidDynamicsP(ϕ, Z, τ)
exey
ezmB
u0(t)
w0(t)z0(t)
u1(t) u2(t) uNB−2(t) uNB−1(t)lS
kB
σz, σz, σu
kW
F0(t)
lH
F1(t) F2(t) FNB−2(t) FNB−1(t)kT
lS− 2lB
Triangular spring–mass–rod arrangement with superposed elastic beam model
Elasto-plastic bristle friction Z′n(τ) = U′n(τ)− αn(τ)βn(τ)∣∣U′n(τ)∣∣ σZZn(τ)
µn(τ) f⊥,n(τ)
Elastic horizontal rotor symmetrically mounted on two GFBs
Small proportion α/2 of total mass shifted to each journal
L
g
ω0 eξ
eη
eζ
Fluid
α2m
b
(1− α)m
k
u0 Foilstructure
Rotordisk
Constant vertical loadand unbalanced disk
Rotational speed(bearing number)
Λ =6µ0ω0
p0
(RC
)2
Unbalance transformation
s′Λ(τ) = +ΛcΛ(τ)− sΛ(τ)[sΛ(τ)
2 + cΛ(τ)2− 1
]c′Λ(τ) = −ΛsΛ(τ)− cΛ(τ)
[sΛ(τ)
2 + cΛ(τ)2− 1
]
Computational Analysis
Finite difference discretization on computational grid Nϕ× NZ = 469× 15Simultaneous subproblem solution by means of collective state vector
Nonlinear ODE system s′(τ) = k{
s(τ), Λ}
with k : Rn×R→ Rns(τ) =
[· · · Di,j(τ) · · · Ti,j(τ) · · · · · · Un(τ) U′n(τ) Zn(τ) · · · X(τ) X′(τ) · · · XD(τ) X′D(τ) · · ·
]>∈ Rn
Results and Conclusions
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
−π −π2 0 +π
2 +π
0.99
1.00
1.01
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.05
1.06
Non
dim
.Pre
ssur
ean
dD
ensi
ty
Nondim
.Temp.and
Vapor
Frac.
Circumferential Coordinate ϕ
Pressure PDensity D
Temperature TVapor Fraction Wv
1 Stable stationary operation under two-phase flow conditions
Fric
tion
For
ce
−30−10
1030 Low Friction Coefficient
Fric
tion
For
ce
−30−10
1030 Moderate Friction Coefficient
Fric
tion
For
ce
Time τ
−30−10
1030
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
High Friction Coefficient
2 Detailed investigation of stick–slip transitions in foil contacts
−1.00
−0.75
−0.50
−0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14
Ver
tical
Rot
orJo
urna
lPos
ition
Y
Rotational Speed Λ
HBHB
LP
LP
LP
LP
Friction Coeff.µ→ 0µ = 0.4µ→ ∞
(Limit Point of Cycles)
(Subcrit. Hopf Bifurcation)
(Supercrit. Hopf Bifurcation)
3 Bifurcation diagram giving insights into coexisting solutions
Γ(t)
e(t)eξ
eη
r
R
q(ϕ, t)
h(ϕ, t)
ω0
eζ
O
P
h(ϕ,t)
ey
Rϕ
exezQ
Flu
idM
od
elfo
rN
on
-Id
ealG
ases
Fo
ilS
tru
ctu
reF
rict
ion
Mo
del Jeffco
tt–LavalR
oto
rM
od
el