TS “ONDOY” (KETSANA)TS “ONDOY” (KETSANA)

TY “PEPENG” (PARMA)TY “PEPENG” (PARMA)

TY “SANTI” (MIRINAE)TY “SANTI” (MIRINAE)

Post-AssessmentPost-Assessment

• Areas Affected: Central, Northern and Southern Luzon

• Casualties: Dead – 956 person

Missing – 84 Injured – 736

• Severely Affected Population: 9.3 M out of the 43.2 M population in

affected regions

• Total Estimated Damage & Losses - USD 4.38 Billion

- Equivalent to about 2.7% of GDP * PDNA Report

* PDNA Report

• Areas Affected: Central, Northern and Southern Luzon

• Casualties: Dead – 956 person

Missing – 84 Injured – 736

• Severely Affected Population: 9.3 M out of the 43.2 M population in

affected regions

• Total Estimated Damage & Losses - USD 4.38 Billion

- Equivalent to about 2.7% of GDP * PDNA Report

* PDNA Report

Disaster Impact*(TS ‘Ondoy’, TY ‘Pepeng’ & TY

‘Santi’)

Disaster Impact*(TS ‘Ondoy’, TY ‘Pepeng’ & TY

‘Santi’)

Too many needs ….. . .too few resources

Limited time

Uncoordinated planning

Leadership

Prevalent Issues

NDCC has been spearheading the “whole-of-government” NDCC has been spearheading the “whole-of-government” approach to address disasters in the countryapproach to address disasters in the country

Lessons have been learned from each major disaster that Lessons have been learned from each major disaster that contribute to the continuous improvement of disaster responsecontribute to the continuous improvement of disaster response

Lessons learned workshops have been instrumental in enhancing Lessons learned workshops have been instrumental in enhancing systems, capabilities and coordination mechanismssystems, capabilities and coordination mechanisms

Aftermath of recent major disasters will provide an effective Aftermath of recent major disasters will provide an effective venue and dynamic process to once again enhance the Philippine venue and dynamic process to once again enhance the Philippine Disaster Management System amidst a changing global Disaster Management System amidst a changing global environmental landscape environmental landscape

With the devastating effects left by the three tropical cyclones With the devastating effects left by the three tropical cyclones “Ondoy”, “Pepeng” and “Santi”, lessons learned must be “Ondoy”, “Pepeng” and “Santi”, lessons learned must be captured at various levels as well as interaction with the captured at various levels as well as interaction with the international humanitarian communityinternational humanitarian community

RationaleRationale

GoalGoal

To further enhance the To further enhance the Philippine Disaster Philippine Disaster

Management System amidst Management System amidst a changing global a changing global

environmental landscape environmental landscape

General ObjectiveGeneral Objective

Review the overall disaster Review the overall disaster response from preparedness response from preparedness response measures, resource response measures, resource

mobilization, coordination, rapid mobilization, coordination, rapid assessment and information assessment and information management based on event management based on event

timelines timelines

Specific ObjectivesSpecific Objectives

1. Revisit emergency preparedness and 1. Revisit emergency preparedness and response measures at the local, regional, response measures at the local, regional, national and international levels;national and international levels;

2. Identify challenges, gaps, operational 2. Identify challenges, gaps, operational needs and other concerns/issues met in needs and other concerns/issues met in preparing for and responding to the preparing for and responding to the disasters;disasters;

3. Determine good practices / best-fit 3. Determine good practices / best-fit solutions and other facilitating factors that solutions and other facilitating factors that could address identified challenges/gaps;could address identified challenges/gaps;

Specific ObjectivesSpecific Objectives

4. Formulate recommendations as 4. Formulate recommendations as possible inputs / reference to policy possible inputs / reference to policy development, advocacy, response development, advocacy, response preparedness planning, preparedness planning, implementation and evaluation, andimplementation and evaluation, and

5. Contribute in the systematic 5. Contribute in the systematic enhancement of the PDMS through enhancement of the PDMS through alignment of plans, programs and alignment of plans, programs and projects projects

PDMS Workshop SeriesPDMS Workshop Series

Part 1: Lessons Learned WorkshopPart 1: Lessons Learned Workshop Dec. 17-18, 2009Dec. 17-18, 2009

Part 2: Post-Workshop Assessment, Part 2: Post-Workshop Assessment, 33rd rd week of January 2010 week of January 2010

Part 3: Report Writing and Part 3: Report Writing and Presentation to NDCCPresentation to NDCC

11stst week of February 2010 week of February 2010

Grouping & Thematic Grouping & Thematic AreasAreas

Four major groupsFour major groups

Based on four (4) thematic areasBased on four (4) thematic areas

- Response Preparedness Measures- Response Preparedness Measures

- Emergency Response, Coordination and - Emergency Response, Coordination and OperationsOperations

- Impact Monitoring and Assessment Planning- Impact Monitoring and Assessment Planning

- Disaster Information Management - Disaster Information Management

EXECOMChair : CDA / Ex-O, NDCC

Vice Chair : CDEXO

ACDEXO / C, Opn / MA, OpRed

Workshop ConvenorAdministrator

GLENN J RABONZA

Lead FacilitatorAtty. P. Duque MNSA

Co-Lead: Mr. S. Jegillos

Theme 1 FacilitatorProf. C. Arcilla

RD CAR – O. Luces

Theme 2 FacilitatorMr. A. Escaño

RD 4A- V. Tomazar

Theme 3 FacilitatorMs. D. LagdameoRD 1 – E. Cabrera

Theme 4 FacilitatorMr. C. Dugenia

RD NCR – S. Cruz

Lead DocumentorMs. R. Rodriguez

Ms. B. Suerte

Theme 1 DocumentorMr. M. Obligado

Ms. M. Marasigan

Theme 2 DocumentorMs. S. Opulencia

Ms. A. Ortega

Theme 3 DocumentorMs. B. Rodriguez Ms. M. Marquez

Theme 4 DocumentorMs. A. Rosana Ms. A. Menguilla

Event CoordinatorMs. O. Basco

SecretariatMs. P. Enriquez

Info Kit & Venue PrepMr. E. Estioko

Budget & FinanceMs. R Doma

ICT Support ServicesMr. A. Lorenzo

WORKSHOP MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Plenary PresentationPlenary Presentation

Sharing of ExperiencesSharing of Experiences

TOPTOP

MethodologyMethodology

Step 3• Plenary Presentation of

Group Outputs• Q & A

• Refinement of Outputs

Step 6• Integration & Next Steps

• Reflection•Closing Program

ProcessProcess

Step 1• Opening Program

• Plenary Presentations- Hazard surveillance &

monitoring- Disaster Impact/NDCC

Responses

Step 2 WORKSHOP I:

•Revisiting the overall response

(local players)- timeliness, adequacy,

appropriateness, participation of key players, analysis of

integration in the DMS, recommendation

Step 4• Message of UNRC

• Recap /Intro of pax• Plenary Presentation of

Group Outputs before int’l. partners

• Q & A

Step 5

• WORKSHOP 2:• Revisiting the overall response

(local & int’l. partners)

Active participation in the workshopsActive participation in the workshops

All inputs / comments / ideas are accepted; write All inputs / comments / ideas are accepted; write them on meta cards, seven (7) words per cardthem on meta cards, seven (7) words per card

No finger pointingNo finger pointing

No dominance of discussionNo dominance of discussion

Punctuality and complete attendancePunctuality and complete attendance

Ground RulesGround Rules