A Study of Preferences of the Investors for Investment in Mutual Funds
A study on investor preferences Towards Various Mutual funds
-
Upload
ankit-agarwal -
Category
Documents
-
view
121 -
download
7
Transcript of A study on investor preferences Towards Various Mutual funds
“A Study on Investor Preferences towards Various Mutual Funds”
A report submitted towards the partial fulfilment of the requirements of the two years
full time Post Graduate Diploma in Management
Submitted by: Vikas Gaba
Post Graduate Diploma in Management
2K7/PGPM/D52
(2007-09)
Asia Pacific Institute of Management Studies
New Delhi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
1
I Thank Asia Pacific Institute of management Studies for giving me an opportunity to
undertake my project work and for giving me knowledge in the field of finance during my
two months summer internship
I express my sincere and humble gratitude to Mr. Sumit Rastogi, for being my project and
Industry guide and educating me to make this project a great success.
I would like to thank Mr. Purshottam Sharna for his valuable guidance and support in
completion of my project. I would express my sincere thanks to all the staff members of
Religare Securities ( Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Parbash, Mr. Fariyaad Hussain, Mr. Muniraj
Singh and Many more... without their support this project would not have been a success.
Last but not the Least i would like to thank those person whose encouragement and ideas
enriched my project.
Vikas Gaba
TABLE OF CONTENT
2
ACKOWLEDGEMENT
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
INTRODUCTION
MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY
COMPANY’S PROFILE
CONCEPT OF MUTUAL FUNDS
EVOLUTION OF MUTUAL FUNDS
BENEFITS OF INVESTING IN MFs
MAJOR MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES INDIA
VARIOUS TYPES OF MFs
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
OBSERVATIONS
RESULTS
ANALYSIS
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATIONS
ABSTRACT
ANNEXURE
BIBLIOGRAPHY / WEBLIOGRAPHY
3
OBJECTIVE
Starting out as an industry with a single player, the UTI, in 1963, the mutual fund industry
in India has come a long way since then. Today, close to 32 players, offering over 756
schemes, dot the industry landscape. The industry has gained enormously in size as
reflected in its assets under management which now:
Category
Asset Under
Management
as on May 31 ,
2008
A Bank Sponsored 90719
B Institutions 18649
C Private Sector & Joint Venture :
Indian 190170
Predominantly Foreign 73525
Predominantly Indian 192744
Grand Total (B+C+D) 565807
4
So today, there is large no. of options for an investor to invest in Mutual Funds.
So, my objective here is:
TO STUDY INVESTORS’ NEEDS i.e. how much risk can they afford, how much returns they
expect on their investment, for what time can they invest and based on their profile, to
study, what kind of funds should they invest in.
To analyze different funds on the basis of their of their risk, returns they give over
different time periods & their return-risk ratio, so as to find out which kind of funds
(Equity, debt or sectoral funds) are suitable to investors during volatile or normal times.
5
INTRODUCTION
Definition: Mutual Fund
A mutual fund is a trust that pools savings of investors who share a common financial
goal and then invests in market instruments such as shares, debentures and other
securities. The income earned through these investments are shared by its unit holders in
proportion to the number of units owned by them making it highly suitable investment
6
option for the common man. A mutual fund provides for an opportunity to invest in a
diversified, professionally managed basket of securities at a relatively low cost.
Acc to SEBI guidelines
Mutual fund is a mechanism for pooling the resources by issuing units to the investors
and investing in securities in accordance with the objectives as disclosed in offer
document. The profits or losses are share by investors in proportion to their investments.
7
Structure of Mutual Funds
Sponsor
Sponsor is the person who acting alone or in combination with another body corporate
establishes a mutual fund. Sponsor must contribute at least 40% of the net worth of the
Investment Managed and meet the eligibility criteria prescribed under the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996.The Sponsor is not responsible
or liable for any loss or shortfall resulting from the operation of the Schemes beyond the
initial contribution made by it towards setting up of the Mutual Fund.
8
Trust
Trustee is usually a company (corporate body) or a Board of Trustees (body of
individuals). The main responsibility of the Trustee is to safeguard the interest of the unit
holders and inter alia ensure that the AMC functions in the interest of investors and in
accordance with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations,
1996, the provisions of the Trust Deed and the Offer Documents of the respective
Schemes. At least 2/3rd directors of the Trustee are independent directors who are not
associated with the Sponsor in any manner.
Asset Management Company
The AMC is appointed by the Trustee as the Investment Manager of the Mutual Fund. The
AMC is required to be approved by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to
act as an asset management company of the Mutual Fund. At least 50% of the directors
of the AMC are independent directors who are not associated with the Sponsor in any
manner. The AMC must have a net worth of at least 10 crore at all times.
Registrars and Transfer Agents
The AMC if so authorized by the Trust Deed appoints the Registrar and Transfer Agent to
the Mutual Fund. The Registrar processes the application form, redemption requests and
dispatches account statements to the unit holders. The Registrar and Transfer agent also
handles communications with investors and updates investor records.9
Mutual funds have been around for more than half a century but they remain a marginal
investment vehicle in India until the beginning of the 90's. Ever since, we have observed a
real boom in their development and academics have begun to pay great attention to
them. Mutual Funds fascinate because of the high return provided by them along with
the benefits of Professional management and risk diversification. Various researches have
been conducted to explore the different facets of Mutual Funds such as returns and risk
factors and the Drivers of Performance. Now there exist several powerful Brands in
mutual fund industry such as Fidelty, Franklin Templeton and S.B.I Mutual Funds.
Starting out as an industry with a single player, the UTI, in 1963, the mutual fund industry
in India has come a long way since then. Today, close to 32 players, offering over 756
schemes, dot the industry landscape. The industry has gained enormously in size as
reflected in its assets under management which now
Starting out as an industry with a single player, the UTI, in 1963, the mutual fund industry
in India has come a long way since then. Today, close to 32 players, offering over 756
schemes, dot the industry landscape. The industry has gained enormously in size as
reflected in its assets under management which now
Category
Asset Under
Management
as on May 31 , 2008
10
A Bank Sponsored 90719
B Institutions 18649
C
Private Sector & Joint Venture :
Indian 190170
Predominantly Foreign 73525
Predominantly Indian 192744
Grand Total (B+C+D) 565807
The journey of the industry has been nothing less than spectacular, particularly in the last
5 years or so. A host of factors has contributed to the phenomenal growth of the
industry. First and foremost, as a result of the increased competition, industry players
have focused on product innovation to drive growth. This has not only helped the
industry players to tap the latent needs of the investors, but also enabled them to expand
markets as more and more investors, including retail investors, have begun to look at
mutual funds as a suitable investment avenue. Second, the need for greater market
penetration has forced industry players to devise innovative channels of delivery to gain
and strengthen their market share. Today, we see new channels and models of
11
distribution emerging as the race among the fund houses heats up to enhance reach to
potential investors. Third, a slew of tax incentives, which include rationalizing of capital
gains tax, aiming to boost equity investing coupled with a benign interest rate regime
have helped mutual funds gain popularity with investors. Finally, a slew of regulatory
measures taken by SEBI have played a crucial role in instilling confidence among
investors, especially retail investors. No doubt these factors have attributed significantly
to the growth of the mutual fund industry in the country, particularly in recent times.
Further, the emergence of India as a major investment destination has done a world of
good to the mutual fund industry in the country as it is witnessing entry of many big
names in the global investment management business. The entry of major global players
like Morgan Stanley, Principal, Sunlife, and Fidelity, while Vanguard is mulling over its
India debut, augurs well for the industry as not only these global investment
management firms bring with them the expertise gained internationally but also bring the
best international practices in terms of performances and investor services which will
benefit the industry and will go a long way in helping it catch up with its counter parts in
developed markets like the US and the UK.
A host of things suggests that the industry is all set to enter a period of high growth. A
robust economy, fledgling stock market, increasing awareness and acceptance of mutual
funds among investors, strong domestic currency, and healthy corporate performances
are among some of the major factors which suggest that the industry's future is bright.
12
However, to gain size, and catch up with developed markets like the US, the industry has
to remove certain obstacles which pose significant challenges.
The Flow Chart below describes broadly the working of a Mutual Fund
13
REVIEW
OF
LITERATURE
14
Research in mutual fund industry has grown to a considerable extent. A number of key
papers has been written exploring the different aspects but still some areas are under
study such as how to rate the different Asset Management Companies, how to design
assured return products, how the investors making investment in Mutual Funds. What
are the factors which affects customer’s decision during investment in Mutual fund? This
part reviews preceding works attempting to answer these issues.
Most research on mutual funds has employed two explanatory variables, namely, risk and
return. This approach implicitly places no value on other potentially important attributes
of the mutual fund investment decision. In keeping with this strictly economic frame,
several scholars have investigated whether or not mutual funds outperform the market.
The existing “Behavioural Finance” studies are very few and very little information is
available about investor perceptions, preferences, attitudes and behaviour. All efforts in
this direction are fragmented.
Ippolito (1992) says that fund/scheme selection by investors is based on past
performance of the funds and money flows into winning funds more rapidly than they
flow out of losing funds.
Goetzman (1997) states that there is evidence that investor psychology affects
fund/scheme selection and switching.15
De Bondt and Thaler (1985) while investigating the possible psychological basis for
investor behaviour, argue that mean reversion in stock prices is an evidence of investor
over reaction where investors overemphasise recent firm performance in forming future
expectations.
In India, one of the earliest attempts was made by NCAER in 1964 when a survey of
households was undertaken to understand the attitude towards and motivation for
saving of individuals. Another NCAER study in 1996 analysed the structure of the capital
market and presented the views and attitudes of individual shareholders.
SEBI – NCAER Survey (2000) was carried out to estimate the number of households and
the population of individual investors, their economic and demographic profile, portfolio
size, and investment preference for equity as well as other savings instruments.
Behaviour is a reaction to a situation. So as situation changes, behaviour gets modified.
Hence, findings and predictions of behaviour studies should be viewed accordingly).
Kulshreshta (1994) offers certain guidelines to the investors in selecting the mutual fund
schemes.
Shanmugham (2000) conducted a survey of 201 individual investors to study the
information sourcing by investors, their perceptions of various investment strategy
dimensions and the factors motivating share investment decisions, and reports that
among the various factors, psychological and sociological factors dominated the
economic factors in share investment decisions.
16
Madhusudhan V Jambodekar (1996) conducted a study to assess the awareness of MFs
among investors, to identify the information sources influencing the buying decision and
the factors influencing the choice of a particular fund. The study reveals among other
things that Income Schemes and Open Ended Schemes are more preferred than Growth
Schemes and Close Ended Schemes during the then prevalent market conditions.
Investors look for safety of Principal, Liquidity and Capital appreciation in the order of
importance; Newspapers and Magazines are the first source of information through
which investors get to know about MFs/Schemes and investor service is a major
differentiating factor in the selection of Mutual Fund Schemes.
Sujit Sikidar and Amrit Pal Singh (1996) carried out a survey with an objective to
understand the behavioural aspects of the investors of the North Eastern region towards
equity and mutual funds investment portfolio. The survey revealed that the salaried and
self employed formed the major investors in mutural fund primarily due to tax
concessions. UTI and SBI schemes were popular in that part of the country then and other
funds had not proved to be a big hit during the time when survey was done.
Anjan Chakarabarti and Harsh Rungta (2000) stressed the importance of brand effect in
determining the competitive position of the AMCs. Their study reveals that brand image
factor, though cannot be easily captured by computable performance measures,
influences the investor’s perception and hence his fund/scheme slection.
Since 1986, a number of articles and brief essays have been published in financial dailies,
periodicals, professional and research journals, explaining the basic concept of Mutual
17
Funds and highlight their importance in the Indian capital market environment. They
touch upon varied aspects like Regulation of Mutual Funds, Investor expectations,
Investor protection, Trend in growth of Mutual Funds and some are critical views on the
performance and functioning of Mutual Funds. Segmentation of investors on the basis of
their characteristics was highlighted by Raja Rajan (1997).
Investor’s characteristics on the basis of their investment size Raja Rajan (1997), and the
relationship between stage in life cycle of the investors and their investment pattern was
studied Raja Rajan (1998).
From the above review it can be inferred that Mutual Fund as an investment vehicle is
capturing the attention of various segments of the society, like academicians,
industrialists, financial intermediaries, investors and regulators or varied reasons and
deserves an indepth study.
In this paper, an attempt is made by the author, mainly to study the factors which
influence the investors in their selection of the fund/scheme.
18
COMPANY PROFILE
19
Religare, a Ranbaxy promoter group company, is one of India’s largest and fastest growing is one of the leading integrated financial services institutions of India.
6 Regional offices
25 Zonal Offices
Present in 1300 location all over India
Present in 400 Cities & Towns
Total group employees 6,500 plus
Present in Retail, Wealth and Institutional Spectrum
Among the largest Retail brokerage branch network, present beyond Tier-I and Tier-II cities in India
Overseas presence established in London, with aggressive plans of straddling other parts of the globe in this financial year.
Vision - To build Religare as a globally trusted brand in the financial services domain and present it as the ‘Investment Gateway of India’
Mission - To provide financial care driven by the core values of diligence & transparency
20
Pharmaceuticals Health Care IT Financial
Group Overview
Brand Essence - Our Core essence is diligence and we are driven by ethical and dynamic processes for wealth creation.
Name
Religare is a Latin word that translates as 'to bind together'.
The Religare name is paired with the symbol of a four-leaf clover. The four-leaf clover is used to define the rare quality of good fortune that is the aim of every financial plan.
The first leaf of the clover represents Hope. The aspirations to succeed. The dream of becoming. Of new possibilities. It is the beginning of every step and the foundations on which a person reaches for the stars.
The second leaf of the clover represents Trust. The ability to place ones own faith in another. To have a relationship as partners in a team. To accomplish a given goal with the balance that brings satisfaction to all not in the binding but in the bond that is built.
The third leaf of the clover represents Care. The secret ingredient that is the cement in every relationship. The truth of feeling that undeJrlines sincerity and the triumph of diligence in every aspect. From it springs true warmth of service and the ability to adapt to evolving environments with consideration to all.
The fourth and final leaf of the clover represents Good Fortune. Signifying that rare ability to meld opportunity and planning with circumstance to generate those often looked for remunerative moments of success.
21
Hope. Trust. Care. Good fortune. All elements perfectly combine in the emblematic and rare, four-leaf clover to visually symbolize the values that bind together and form the core of the Religare vision.
Most of the subsidiaries have come into existence after 2005.
Religare Enterprises Limited
22
Religare
Securities Ltd
Religare Enterprises Ltd
Religare
Commodities Ltd
Religare
Insurance Broking
Ltd Religare
Venture Capital
Pvt Ltd
Religare Finvest
Ltd
Religare Wealth
Management
Services Ltd
Religare Capital
Markets Ltd
Religare Realty
Ltd
Religare Finance
Ltd
Religare Securities Limited -
Equity Broking
Portfolio Management Services
Depository
Online Investment Portal
Institutional Equity Broking
Religare Finvest Limited -
Lending and Distribution business
Religare Commodities Limited -
Commodity Business
Religare Insurance Broking Limited -
Life and Non Life Insurance
Reinsurance
Religare Capital Markets Limited -
Investment Banking
SEBI Registered Merchant Banker
23
Acquisition in UK through an international arm
Religare Arts Initiative Limited -
Art Fund and other businesses of Art
Gallery to be launched soon
Religare Realty Limited -
Real Estate Management Company
Religare Venture Capital Private Limited -
Private Equity and Investment Manager
24
New Initiatives
Religare Enterprises Limited and Vistaar Entertainment Ventures Private Limited
launched India’s first ever film fund - Vistaar Religare Film Fund (VRFF) for the Film/Media
business.
Religare Macquarie Wealth Management Limited -
50: 50 joint venture with Macquarie for wealth management business
25
Religare AEGON AMC -
50:50 Joint Venture between REL and Aegon for Asset Management business in India.
AEGON Religare Life Insurance -
Life Insurance Company, Joint Venture between REL, Aegon and BCCL for Life insurance
business in India .
26
Religare Securities Limited (RSL) is a leading equity and securities firm in India. The major activities and offerings of the company today are Equity broking, Depository Participant Services, Portfolio Management Services, Institutional Brokerage & Research, Investment Banking and Corporate Finance.
Client Interface
27
Products
Arts
Initiative
Investment
Banking
Wealth
Advisory
Services
Personal
Credit
Insurance
Mutual Fund
Commodity
Equity
REL
Retail Spectrum- To cater to a large number of retail clients by offering all products under one roof through the Branch Network and Online mode
Equity and Commodity Trading
Personal Financial Services
Mutual Funds
Insurance
Saving Products
Personal Credit
Personal Loans
Loans against Shares
Online Investment Portal
Institutional Spectrum- To Forge & build strong relationships with Corporate Client and Institutions
Institutional Equity Broking
Investment Banking
Merchant Banking
Transaction Advisory
28
Corporate Finance
Wealth Spectrum - To provide customized wealth advisory services to High Net worth
Individuals
Wealth Advisory Services
Portfolio Management Services
International Advisory Fund Management Services
Priority Client Equity Services
Arts Initiative
Retail Spectrum
Wide ReachPresent in more than 1200 locations all
over India
Present in 400 Cities & Towns
More than 150% increase in penetration in
the current fiscal
Large Client Base 2.75 Lac + Clients
29
More than 150% increase in client base in
2006-07
Market ShareEquity Broking: 4.5% - 5.5% of the Market
Turnover
Commodity Broking: 3-4% of the Market
Turnover
Online Investment: 8% of the Market
Turnover
Almost 100% increase in Market Share
since last fiscal
Dedicated Sales ForceEquity and Commodity: 2400
Online Investment: 900
PFS: 300
Insurance: 140
Personal Credit: 120
More than 250% increase in retail sales
work force over the last financial year
30
Key Facts
Official Launch of E-broking in August 2006
Aggressive growth has been observed in the client base for online trading
Acquired market share of 8% in internet trading volumes *
Recently launched a revamped, unique 360 degrees customer centric online trading
portal
To increase team strength to 3000 employees purely for internet trading
Targeting 300,000 online clients by the end of this financial year
Rising Number of online clients
31
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000
Aug-06
Sep-06
Oct-06
Nov-06
Dec-06
Jan-07
Feb-07
Mar-07
32
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Aug-06
Sep-06
Oct-06
Nov-06
Dec-06
J an-07 Feb-07
Mar-07
In $ mn Rising Turnover
Personal Financial Services
PFS caters to the financial needs of individuals by advising them on various financial plans
Financial planning for retail investment is not widespread in India
PFS was started to target the rapidly expanding middle net worth individuals (MNI’s) in
India
Rapid rollout of PFS Products offering, such as mutual funds, life and general insurance,
fixed income, small savings instruments, capital bonds and equity IPOs
Expert group of Religare’s PFS advisors provide high quality customized solutions
Dedicated Team of more than 200 advisors, to be expanded to 800 by March 2008
Rising MF Collections for both Debt & Equity
33
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Apr-
06
May-
06
J un-
06
J ul-06 Aug-
06
Sep-
06
Oct-
06
Nov-
06
Dec-
06
J an-
07
Feb-
07
Mar-
07
Product –Wise Clients
34
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Insurance IPO MF's
Concept Of
Mutual Funds
35
History (Global) of Mutual Funds
The first open-end mutual fund, Massachusetts Investor Trust was founded on March 21,
1924, and after one year had 200 shareholders and $392,000 in assets. The entire
industry, which included a few close-end funds, represented less than $10 million in
1924.
The stock market crash of 1929 slowed the growth of mutual funds. In response to the
stock market crash, Congress passed the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. These laws require that a fund be registered with the SEC and
provide prospective investors with a prospectus. The SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission) helped create the Investment Company Act of 1940 which provides the
guidelines that all funds must comply with today.
In 1951, the number of funds surpassed 100 and the number shareholders exceeded 1
million. Only in 1954 did the stock market finally rise above its 1929 peak and by the end
of the fifties there were 155 mutual funds with $15.8 billion in assets. In 1967 funds hit
their best year, one quarter earning at least 50 % with an average return of 67 %, but it
was done by cheating using borrowed money, risky options, and pumping up returns with
privately traded “letter stock. By the end of the 60’s there were 269 funds with a total of
$48.3 billion.
36
With renewed confidence in the stock market, mutual funds began to blossom. By the
end of the 1960’s there were around 270 funds with $48 billion in assets. The first retail
index fund was released in 1976, called the First Index Investment Trust. It is now called
the Vanguard 500 Index fund and is one of the largest mutual funds ever with the in
excess of $100 billion in assets.
As of April 2006, there are 8606 mutual funds that belong to the Investment Company
Institute (ICI), the national association of Investment Companies in the United States.
PHASES OF MUTUAL FUNDS (in India)
The Mutual Fund industry started in India with the setting up of UTI in 1964 by R.B.I. Its
development can be described into four Phases as follows:
First Phase-1964-87
Unit Trust of India was established on 1963 by an Act of Parliament. It was set up by the
Reserve Bank of India and functioned under the regulatory and administrative control of
the Reserve Bank of India. In 1978 UTI was de-linked from RBI and the Industrial
Development Bank of India (IDBI) took over the regulatory and administrative control in
place of RBI. The first scheme launched by UTI was Unit Scheme 1964. At the end of 1998
UTI had Rs 6700 crore of assets under management.
Second Phase-1987-1993 (Entry of public sector funds)
37
1987 marked the entry of non- UTI, public sector mutual funds set up by public sector
banks and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and General Insurance Corporation of
India. SBI Mutual fund was the first non-UTI Mutual Fund established in June 1987
followed by Canbank Mutual Fund (Dec87). At the end of 1993, the mutual fund industry
had assets under management of Rs. 47,004 crores.
Third Phase-1993-2003 (Entry of Private Sector Funds):
The third phase saw the entry of private and foreign sectors in mutual fund industry in
1993 with Kothari pioneer mutual fund (now merged with Franklin Templeton) being set
up as the first private sector fund. With the entry of private sector funds in 1993, a new
era started in the Indian Mutual Fund industry, giving the Indian investor a wider choice
of fund families. Also, 1993 was the year in which the first Mutual Fund Regulations came
into being, under which all mutual funds, except UTI were to be registered and governed.
The opening up of the asset management business to private sector in 1993 saw
international players like Morgan Stanley and Jardine Fleming etc.
The 1993 SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations were substituted by a more comprehensive and
revised Mutual Fund Regulation in 1996.
The number of mutual fund houses went on
increasing, with many foreign mutual funds setting
up funds in India and also the industry has
witnessed several mergers and acquisitions. As at
38
the end of January 2003, there were 33 mutual funds with total assets of Rs. 1,21,805
crores. The Unit Trust of India with Rs. 44,541 crores of assets under management was
way ahead of other mutual funds.
Fourth Phase-since February 2003:
In February 2003, following the repeal of the Unit Trust of India Act 1963 UTI was
bifurcated into separate entities. One is the specified undertaking of the Unit Trust of
India with assets under management of Rs. 29,835 crores as at the end of January 2003,
representing broadly, the assets of US 64 scheme and certain other schemes. The
specified Undertaking of Unit Trust of India, functioning under an administrator and
under the rules framed by Government of India and does not come under the purview of
the Mutual Fund regulations.
The second is the UTI Mutual Fund Ltd, sponsored by SBI, PNB, BOB and LIC. It is
registered with SEBI and functions under the Mutual Fund Regulations. With the
bifurcation of the erstwhile UTI which had in March 2000 more than 76,000 Crores of
Assets under Management and with the setting up of a UTI Mutual Fund, confirming to
the SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations, and with recent mergers taking place among different
private sector funds, the mutual fund industry has entered its current phase of
39
consolidation and growth, as at the end of September, 2004, there were 29 funds, which
manage assets of Rs.153108 crores under 421 schemes.
Benefits of Mutual Fund investment
Professional Management: Mutual Funds provide the services of experienced and skilled
professionals, backed by a dedicated investment research team that analyses the
performance and prospects of companies and selects suitable investments to achieve the
objectives of the scheme.
Diversification: Mutual Funds invest in a number of companies across a broad cross-
section of industries and sectors. This diversification reduces the risk because seldom do
all stocks decline at the same time and in the same proportion. You achieve this
diversification through a Mutual Fund with far less money than you can do on your own.
40
Convenient Administration: Investing in a Mutual Fund reduces paperwork and helps you
avoid many problems such as bad deliveries, delayed payments and follow up with
brokers and companies. Mutual Funds save your time and make investing easy and
convenient.
Return Potential: Over a medium to long-term, Mutual Funds have the potential to
provide a higher return as they invest in a diversified basket of selected securities.
Low Costs: Mutual Funds are a relatively less expensive way to invest compared to
directly investing in the capital markets because the benefits of scale in brokerage,
custodial and other fees translate into lower costs for investors.
Liquidity: In open-end schemes, the investor gets the money back promptly at net asset
value related prices from the Mutual Fund. In closed-end schemes, the units can be sold
on a stock exchange at the prevailing market price or the investor can avail of the facility
of direct repurchase at NAV related prices by the Mutual Fund.
Transparency: Investors get regular information on the value of your investment in
addition to disclosure on the specific investments made by the scheme, the proportion
invested in each class of assets and the fund manager's investment strategy and outlook.
Flexibility: Through features such as regular investment plans, regular withdrawal plans
and dividend reinvestment plans, one can systematically invest or withdraw funds
according to your needs and convenience.
41
Affordability: Investors individually may lack sufficient funds to invest in high-grade
stocks. A mutual fund because of its large corpus allows even a small investor to take the
benefit of its investment strategy.
Choice of Schemes: Mutual Fund offers a family of schemes to suit your varying needs
over a lifetime. This offers investors to further diversify their investments.
Well Regulated: All Mutual Funds are registered with SEBI and they function within the
provisions of strict regulations designed to protect the interests of investors. The
operations of Mutual Funds are regularly monitored by SEBI.
Limitation of Mutual Fund Investment
42
No Control Over Cost: An Investor in mutual fund has no control over the overall costs of
investing. He pays an investment management fee (which is a percentage of his
investments) as long as he remains invested in fund, whether the fund value is rising or
declining. He also has to pay fund distribution costs, which he would not incur in direct
investing.
However this only means that there is a cost to obtain the benefits of mutual fund
services. This cost is often less than the cost of direct investing.
No Tailor-Made Portfolios: Investing through mutual funds means delegation of the
decision of portfolio composition to the fund managers. The very high net worth
individuals or large corporate investors may find this to be a constraint in achieving their
objectives. However, most mutual fund help investors overcome this constraint by
offering large no. of schemes within the same fund.
Managing A Portfolio Of Funds: Availability of large no. of funds can actually mean too
much choice for the investors. He may again need advice on how to select a fund to
achieve his objectives.
AMFI has taken initiative in this regard by starting a training and certification program
for prospective Mutual Fund Advisors. SEBI has made this certification compulsory for
every mutual fund advisor interested in selling mutual fund.
43
Taxes: During a typical year, most actively managed mutual funds sell anywhere from 20
to 70 percent of the securities in their portfolios. If your fund makes a profit on its sales,
you will pay taxes on the income you receive, even if you reinvest the money you made.
Cost of Churn: The portfolio of fund does not remain constant. The extent to which the
portfolio changes is a function of the style of the individual fund manager i.e. whether he
is a buy and hold type of manager or one who aggressively churns the fund. It is also
dependent on the volatility of the fund size i.e. whether the fund constantly receives
fresh subscriptions and redemptions. Such portfolio changes have associated costs of
brokerage, custody fees etc. which lowers the portfolio return commensurately.
Major Mutual Fund Companies in India
ABN AMRO Mutual Fund
ABN AMRO Mutual Fund was setup on April 15, 2004 with ABN AMRO Trustee (India) Pvt.
Ltd. as the Trustee Company. The AMC, ABN AMRO Asset Management (India) Ltd. was
incorporated on November 4, 2003. Deutsche Bank A G is the custodian of ABN AMRO
Mutual Fund. As of may 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.6066.30 crores under
management.
Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund
44
Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund is the joint venture of Aditya Birla Group and Sun Life
Financial. Sun Life Financial is a global organisation evolved in 1871 and is being
represented in Canada, the US, the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia and Bermuda apart from
India. Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund follows a conservative long-term approach to
investment. As of may 2008, the fund has assets of Rs. 41,426.64 crores under
management.
Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund
Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund or BOB Mutual Fund was setup on October 30, 1992 under
the sponsorship of Bank of Baroda. BOB Asset Management Company Limited is the AMC
of BOB Mutual Fund and was incorporated on November 5, 1992. Deutsche Bank AG is
the custodian of Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund. As of May 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.
64.83 crores under management.
HDFC Mutual Fund
AMC is a joint venture between housing finance giant HDFC and British investment firm
Standard Life Investments Limited was setup on June 30, 2000. It conducts the operations
of the Mutual Fund and manages assets of the schemes, including the schemes launched
from time to time. As of Feb 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.46,291.97 crores under
management.
In 2003, following a decision by the Zurich Insurance Company (ZIC), the Sponsor of
Zurich India Mutual Fund, to divest its asset management business in India, AMC had
45
entered into an agreement with ZIC to acquire the asset management business.
Consequently, all the schemes of Zurich Mutual Fund in India had been transferred to
HDFC Mutual Fund and renamed as HDFC schemes.
HSBC Mutual Fund
HSBC Mutual Fund was setup on May 27, 2002 with HSBC Securities and Capital Markets
(India) Private Limited as the sponsor. Board of Trustees, HSBC Mutual Fund acts as the
Trustee Company of HSBC Mutual Fund. As of may 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.
17,617.11 crores under management.
ING Vysya Mutual Fund
ING Vysya Mutual Fund was setup on February 11, 1999 with the same named Trustee
Company. It is a joint venture of Vysya and ING. The AMC, ING Investment Management
(India) Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated on April 6, 1998. As of May 2008, the fund has assets of
Rs. 8,608.29 crores under management.
Prudential ICICI Mutual Fund
The mutual fund of ICICI is a joint venture with Prudential Plc. of America; one of the
largest life insurance companies in the USA. Prudential ICICI Mutual Fund was setup on
13th of October 1993 with two sponsors, Prudential Plc. and ICICI Ltd. The Trustee 46
Company formed is Prudential ICICI Trust Ltd. and the AMC is Prudential ICICI Asset
Management Company Limited incorporated on 22nd of June, 1993. As of May 2008, the
fund has assets of Rs.59,573.08 crores under management.
Sahara Mutual Fund
Sahara Mutual Fund was set up on July 18, 1996 with Sahara India Financial Corporation
Ltd. as the sponsor. Sahara Asset Management Company Private Limited incorporated on
August 31, 1995 works as the AMC of Sahara Mutual Fund. As of May 2008, the fund has
assets of Rs. 180.64 crores under management.
State Bank of India Mutual Fund
State Bank of India Mutual Fund is the first Bank sponsored Mutual Fund to launch
offshore fund, the India Magnum Fund with a corpus of Rs. 225 cr. approximately. Today
it is the largest Bank sponsored Mutual Fund in India. They have already launched 52
Schemes out of which 15 have already yielded handsome returns to investors. State Bank
of India Mutual Fund has more than Rs. 29,492.97 Crores as AUM. Now it has an investor
base of over 38 Lakhs spread over 52 schemes.
Tata Mutual Fund
Tata Mutual Fund (TMF) is a Trust under the Indian Trust Act, 1882. The sponsors for Tata
Mutual Fund are Tata Sons Ltd., and Tata Investment Corporation Ltd. The investment
manager is Tata Asset Management Limited and its Tata Trustee Company Pvt. Limited.
47
Tata Asset Management Limited's is one of the fastest in the country with more than Rs.
24,478.45 crores as on may, 2008 of AUM.
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company (KMAMC) is a subsidiary of KMBL. KMAMC
started its operations in December 1998. Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund offers schemes
catering to investors with varying risk - return profiles. It was the first company to launch
dedicated gilt scheme investing only in government securities. As of May 2008, the fund
has assets of Rs.21,580.62 crores under management.
Unit Trust of India Mutual Fund
UTI Asset Management Company Private Limited, established in Jan 14, 2003, manages
the UTI Mutual Fund with the support of UTI Trustee Company Private Limited. UTI Asset
Management Company presently manages a corpus of over Rs. 48,347.60 Crore. The
sponsors of UTI Mutual Fund are Bank of Baroda (BOB), Punjab National Bank (PNB),
State Bank of India (SBI), and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). The schemes of UTI
Mutual Fund are Liquid Funds, Income Funds, Asset Management Funds, Index Funds,
Equity Funds and Balance Funds.
Reliance Mutual Fund
Reliance Mutual Fund (RMF) was established as trust under Indian Trusts Act, 1882. The
sponsor of RMF is Reliance Capital Limited and Reliance Capital Trustee Co. Limited is the
Trustee. It was registered on June 30, 1995 as Reliance Capital Mutual Fund, which was 48
changed on March 11, 2004. Reliance Mutual Fund was formed for launching of various
schemes under which units are issued to the Public with a view to contribute to the
capital market and to provide investors the opportunities to make investments in
diversified securities. As of May 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.93,531.68 crores under
management.
IDFC MUTUAL FUND
Standard Chartered Mutual Fund was set up on March 13, 2000 sponsored by Standard
Chartered Bank. The Trustee is Standard Chartered Trustee Company Pvt. Ltd. Standard
Chartered Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd. is the AMC which was incorporated with
SEBI on December 20,1999. As of May 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.12,513.40 crores
under management.
Franklin Templeton India Mutual Fund
The group, Frnaklin Templeton Investments is a California (USA) based company. It is one
of the largest financial services groups in the world. Investors can buy or sell the Mutual
Fund through their financial advisor or through mail or through their website. They have
Open end Diversified Equity schemes, Open end Sector Equity schemes, Open end Hybrid
schemes, Open end Tax Saving schemes, Open end Income and Liquid schemes, Closed
end Income schemes and Open end Fund of Funds schemes to offer. As of May 2008, the
fund has assets of Rs. 25,621.97 crores under management.
Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund India
49
Morgan Stanley is a worldwide financial services company and its leading in the market in
securities, investment management and credit services. Morgan Stanley Investment
Management (MISM) was established in the year 1975. It provides customized asset
management services and products to governments, corporations, pension funds and
non-profit organisations. Its services are also extended to high net worth individuals and
retail investors. In India it is known as Morgan Stanley Investment Management Private
Limited (MSIM India) and its AMC is Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund (MSMF). This is the first
close end diversified equity scheme serving the needs of Indian retail investors focusing
on a long-term capital appreciation. As of May 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.
3,416.93crores under management.
Escorts Mutual Fund
Escorts Mutual Fund was setup on April 15, 1996 with Escorts Finance Limited as its
sponsor. The Trustee Company is Escorts Investment Trust Limited. Its AMC was
incorporated on December 1, 1995 with the name Escorts Asset Management Limited. As
of May 2008, the fund has assets of Rs. 173.42 crores under management.
Alliance Capital Mutual Fund
Alliance Capital Mutual Fund was setup on December 30, 1994 with Alliance Capital
Management Corp. of Delaware (USA) as sponsorer. The Trustee is ACAM Trust Company
50
Pvt. Ltd. and AMC, the Alliance Capital Asset Management India (Pvt) Ltd. with the
corporate office in Mumbai.
Benchmark Mutual Fund
Benchmark Mutual Fund was setup on June 12, 2001 with Niche Financial Services Pvt.
Ltd. as the sponsor and Benchmark Trustee Company Pvt. Ltd. as the Trustee Company.
Incorporated on October 16, 2000 and headquartered in Mumbai, Benchmark Asset
Management Company Pvt. Ltd. is the AMC. As of May 2008, the fund has assets of Rs.
4954.42 crores under management.
Canbank Mutual Fund
Canbank Mutual Fund was setup on December 19, 1987 with Canara Bank acting as the
sponsor. Canbank Investment Management Services Ltd. incorporated on March 2, 1993
is the AMC. The Corporate Office of the AMC is in Mumbai. As of May 2008, the fund has
assets of Rs. 4122.37 crores under management.
LIC Mutual Fund
Life Insurance Corporation of India set up LIC Mutual Fund on 19th June 1989. It
contributed Rs. 2 Crores towards the corpus of the Fund. LIC Mutual Fund was
constituted as a Trust in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Trust Act, 1882.The
Company started its business on 29th April 1994. The Trustees of LIC Mutual Fund have
appointed Jeevan Bima Sahayog Asset Management Company Ltd as the Investment
51
Managers for LIC Mutual Fund. As of May 2008, the fund has assets of Rs. 15,103 crores
under management.
52
Assets under Management:
Asset Under Management
1%0%1%5%
0%1%1%2%
3%
0%2%
7%
8%
4%
10%
2%1%0%5%3%
1%1%4%
0%
14%
0%
5%
3%
2%
4%0%
9%
ABN AMRO Mutual Fund
AIG Global Investment Group Mutual Fund
Benchmark Mutual Fund
Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund
BOB Mutual Fund
Canbank Mutual Fund
DBS Chola Mutual Fund
Deutsche Mutual Fund
DSP Merrill Lynch Mutual Fund
Escorts Mutual Fund
Fidelity Mutual Fund
Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
HDFC Mutual Fund
HSBC Mutual Fund
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
ING Mutual Fund
JM Financial Mutual Fund
JPMorgan Mutual Fund
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
LIC Mutual Fund
Lotus India Mutual Fund
Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund
PRINCIPAL Mutual Fund
Quantum Mutual Fund
Reliance Mutual Fund
Sahara Mutual Fund
SBI Mutual Fund
Standard Chartered Mutual Fund
Sundaram BNP Paribas Mutual Fund
Tata Mutual Fund
Taurus Mutual Fund
UTI Mutual Fund
53
TYPES OF MUTUAL FUNDS
General Classification of Mutual Funds
Open end funds/ closed end funds
Open-end
Funds that can sell and purchase units at any point in time are classified as Open-end
Funds. The fund size (corpus) of an open-end fund is variable (keeps changing) because of
continuous selling (to investors) and repurchases (from the investors) by the fund. An
open-end fund is not required to keep selling new units to the investors at all times but is
required to always repurchase, when an investor wants to sell his units. The NAV of an
open-end fund is calculated every day.
Closed-end Funds
Funds that can sell a fixed number of units only during the New Fund Offer (NFO) period
are known as Closed-end Funds. The corpus of a Closed-end Fund remains unchanged at
all times. After the closure of the offer, buying and redemption of units by the investors
directly from the Funds is not allowed. However, to protect the interests of the investors,
SEBI provides investors with two avenues to liquidate their positions:
Closed-end Funds are listed on the stock exchanges where investors can buy/sell units
from/to each other. The trading is generally done at a discount to the NAV of the scheme.
The NAV of a closed-end fund is computed on a weekly basis (updated every Thursday).
54
Closed-end Funds may also offer "buy-back of units" to the unit holders. In this case, the
corpus of the Fund and its outstanding units do get changed.
Load Funds/ No load Funds
Load funds-Mutual Funds incur various expenses on marketing, distribution, advertising,
portfolio churning, fund manager's salary etc. Many funds recover these expenses from
the investors in the form of load. These funds are known as Load Funds. A load fund may
impose following types of loads on the investors:
Entry Load - Also known as Front-end load, it refers to the load charged to an investor at
the time of his entry into a scheme. Entry load is deducted from the investor's
contribution amount to the fund.
Exit Load - Also known as Back-end load, these charges are imposed on an investor when
he redeems his units (exits from the scheme). Exit load is deducted from the redemption
proceeds to an outgoing investor.
Deferred Load - Deferred load is charged to the scheme over a period of time.
Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (CDSC) - In some schemes, the percentage of exit load
reduces as the investor stays longer with the fund. This type of load is known as
Contingent Deferred Sales Charge.
55
No-load Funds
All those funds that do not charge any of the above mentioned loads are known as No-
load Funds.
Tax Exempt/ Non Tax Exempt Funds
Tax-exempt Funds- Funds that invest in securities free from tax are known as Tax-exempt
Funds. All open-end equity oriented funds are exempt from distribution tax (tax for
distributing income to investors). Long term capital gains and dividend income in the
hands of investors are tax-free.
Non-Tax-exempt Funds- Funds that invest in taxable securities are known as Non-Tax-
exempt Funds. In India, all funds, except open-end equity oriented funds are liable to pay
tax on distribution income. Profits arising out of sale of units by an investor within 12
months of purchase are categorized as short-term capital gains, which are taxable. Sale of
units of an equity oriented fund is subject to Securities Transaction Tax (STT). STT is
deducted from the redemption proceeds to an investor.
56
BROAD MUTUAL FUND TYPES
57
58
1. Equity Funds - Equity funds are considered to be the more risky funds as compared to
other fund types, but they also provide higher returns than other funds. It is advisable
that an investor looking to invest in an equity fund should invest for long term i.e. for 3
years or more. There are different types of equity funds each falling into different risk
bracket. In the order of decreasing risk level, there are following types of equity funds:
Aggressive Growth Funds - In Aggressive Growth Funds, fund managers aspire for
maximum capital appreciation and invest in less researched shares of speculative nature.
Because of these speculative investments Aggressive Growth Funds become more volatile
and thus, are prone to higher risk than other equity funds.
Growth Funds - Growth Funds also invest for capital appreciation (with time horizon of 3
to 5 years) but they are different from Aggressive Growth Funds in the sense that they
invest in companies that are expected to outperform the market in the future. Without
entirely adopting speculative strategies, Growth Funds invest in those companies that are
expected to post above average earnings in the future.
Speciality Funds - Speciality Funds have stated criteria for investments and their portfolio
comprises of only those companies that meet their criteria. Criteria for some speciality
funds could be to invest/not to invest in particular regions/companies. Speciality funds are
concentrated and thus, are comparatively riskier than diversified funds.. There are
following types of speciality funds:
Sector Funds: Equity funds that invest in a particular sector/industry of the market are
59
known as Sector Funds. The exposure of these funds is limited to a particular sector (say
Information Technology, Auto, Banking, Pharmaceuticals or Fast Moving Consumer
Goods) which is why they are more risky than equity funds that invest in multiple sectors.
Foreign Securities Funds: Foreign Securities Equity Funds have the option to invest in one
or more foreign companies. Foreign securities funds achieve international diversification
and hence they are less risky than sector funds. However, foreign securities funds are
exposed to foreign exchange rate risk and country risk.
Mid-Cap or Small-Cap Funds: Funds that invest in companies having lower market
capitalization than large capitalization companies are called Mid-Cap or Small-Cap Funds.
Market capitalization of Mid-Cap companies is less than that of big, blue chip companies
(less than Rs. 2500 crores but more than Rs. 500 crores) and Small-Cap companies have
market capitalization of less than Rs. 500 crores. Market Capitalization of a company can
be calculated by multiplying the market price of the company's share by the total number
of its outstanding shares in the market. The shares of Mid-Cap or Small-Cap Companies
are not as liquid as of Large-Cap Companies which gives rise to volatility in share prices of
these companies and consequently, investment gets risky.
Option Income Funds: While not yet available in India, Option Income Funds write options
on a large fraction of their portfolio. Proper use of options can help to reduce volatility,
which is otherwise considered as a risky instrument. These funds invest in big, high
dividend yielding companies, and then sell options against their stock positions, which
60
generate stable income for investors.
Diversified Equity Funds - Except for a small portion of investment in liquid money
market, diversified equity funds invest mainly in equities without any concentration on a
particular sector(s). These funds are well diversified and reduce sector-specific or
company-specific risk. However, like all other funds diversified equity funds too are
exposed to equity market risk. One prominent type of diversified equity fund in India is
Equity Linked Savings Schemes (ELSS). As per the mandate, a minimum of 90% of
investments by ELSS should be in equities at all times. ELSS investors are eligible to claim
deduction from taxable income (up to Rs 1 lakh) at the time of filing the income tax
return. ELSS usually has a lock-in period and in case of any redemption by the investor
before the expiry of the lock-in period makes him liable to pay income tax on such
income(s) for which he may have received any tax exemption(s) in the past.
Equity Index Funds - Equity Index Funds have the objective to match the performance of a
specific stock market index. The portfolio of these funds comprises of the same companies
that form the index and is constituted in the same proportion as the index. Equity index
funds that follow broad indices (like S&P CNX Nifty, Sensex) are less risky than equity
index funds that follow narrow sectoral indices (like BSEBANKEX or CNX Bank Index etc).
Narrow indices are less diversified and therefore, are more risky.
Value Funds - Value Funds invest in those companies that have sound fundamentals and
whose share prices are currently under-valued. The portfolio of these funds comprises of
shares that are trading at a low Price to Earning Ratio (Market Price per Share / Earning
61
per Share) and a low Market to Book Value (Fundamental Value) Ratio. Value Funds may
select companies from diversified sectors and are exposed to lower risk level as compared
to growth funds or speciality funds. Value stocks are generally from cyclical industries
(such as cement, steel, sugar etc.) which make them volatile in the short-term. Therefore,
it is advisable to invest in Value funds with a long-term time horizon as risk in the long
term, to a large extent, is reduced.
Equity Income or Dividend Yield Funds - The objective of Equity Income or Dividend Yield
Equity Funds is to generate high recurring income and steady capital appreciation for
investors by investing in those companies which issue high dividends (such as Power or
Utility companies whose share prices fluctuate comparatively lesser than other
companies' share prices). Equity Income or Dividend Yield Equity Funds are generally
exposed to the lowest risk level as compared to other equity funds.
2. Debt / Income Funds- Funds that invest in medium to long-term debt instruments
issued by private companies, banks, financial institutions, governments and other entities
belonging to various sectors (like infrastructure companies etc.) are known as Debt /
Income Funds. Debt funds are low risk profile funds that seek to generate fixed current
income (and not capital appreciation) to investors. In order to ensure regular income to
investors, debt (or income) funds distribute large fraction of their surplus to investors.
Although debt securities are generally less risky than equities, they are subject to credit
risk (risk of default) by the issuer at the time of interest or principal payment. To minimize
the risk of default, debt funds usually invest in securities from issuers who are rated by
62
credit rating agencies and are considered to be of "Investment Grade". Debt funds that
target high returns are more risky. Based on different investment objectives, there can be
following types of debt funds:
Diversified Debt Funds - Debt funds that invest in all securities issued by entities
belonging to all sectors of the market are known as diversified debt funds. The best
feature of diversified debt funds is that investments are properly diversified into all
sectors which results in risk reduction. Any loss incurred, on account of default by a debt
issuer, is shared by all investors which further reduces risk for an individual investor.
Focused Debt Funds* - Unlike diversified debt funds, focused debt funds are narrow focus
funds that are confined to investments in selective debt securities, issued by companies of
a specific sector or industry or origin. Some examples of focused debt funds are sector,
specialized and offshore debt funds, funds that invest only in Tax Free Infrastructure or
Municipal Bonds. Because of their narrow orientation, focused debt funds are more risky
as compared to diversified debt funds. Although not yet available in India, these funds are
conceivable and may be offered to investors very soon.
High Yield Debt funds - As we now understand that risk of default is present in all debt
funds, and therefore, debt funds generally try to minimize the risk of default by investing
in securities issued by only those borrowers who are considered to be of "investment
grade". But, High Yield Debt Funds adopt a different strategy and prefer securities issued
by those issuers who are considered to be of "below investment grade". The motive
behind adopting this sort of risky strategy is to earn higher interest returns from these
63
issuers. These funds are more volatile and bear higher default risk, although they may
earn at times higher returns for investors.
Assured Return Funds - Although it is not necessary that a fund will meet its objectives or
provide assured returns to investors, but there can be funds that come with a lock-in
period and offer assurance of annual returns to investors during the lock-in period. Any
shortfall in returns is suffered by the sponsors or the Asset Management Companies
(AMCs). These funds are generally debt funds and provide investors with a low-risk
investment opportunity. However, the security of investments depends upon the net
worth of the guarantor (whose name is specified in advance on the offer document). To
safeguard the interests of investors, SEBI permits only those funds to offer assured return
schemes whose sponsors have adequate net-worth to guarantee returns in the future. In
the past, UTI had offered assured return schemes (i.e. Monthly Income Plans of UTI) that
assured specified returns to investors in the future. UTI was not able to fulfill its promises
and faced large shortfalls in returns. Eventually, government had to intervene and took
over UTI's payment obligations on itself. Currently, no AMC in India offers assured return
schemes to investors, though possible.
Fixed Term Plan Series - Fixed Term Plan Series usually are closed-end schemes having
short term maturity period (of less than one year) that offer a series of plans and issue
units to investors at regular intervals. Unlike closed-end funds, fixed term plans are not
listed on the exchanges. Fixed term plan series usually invest in debt / income schemes
and target short-term investors. The objective of fixed term plan schemes is to gratify
64
investors by generating some expected returns in a short period.
3. Gilt Funds - Also known as Government Securities in India, Gilt Funds invest in
government papers (named dated securities) having medium to long term maturity
period. Issued by the Government of India, these investments have little credit risk (risk
of default) and provide safety of principal to the investors. However, like all debt funds,
gilt funds too are exposed to interest rate risk. Interest rates and prices of debt securities
are inversely related and any change in the interest rates results in a change in the NAV
of debt/gilt funds in an opposite direction.
4. Money Market / Liquid Funds - Money market / liquid funds invest in short-term
(maturing within one year) interest bearing debt instruments. These securities are highly
liquid and provide safety of investment, thus making money market / liquid funds the
safest investment option when compared with other mutual fund types. However, even
money market / liquid funds are exposed to the interest rate risk. The typical investment
options for liquid funds include Treasury Bills (issued by governments), Commercial
papers (issued by companies) and Certificates of Deposit (issued by banks).
5. Hybrid Funds - As the name suggests, hybrid funds are those funds whose portfolio
includes a blend of equities, debts and money market securities. Hybrid funds have an
65
equal proportion of debt and equity in their portfolio. There are following types of hybrid
funds in India:
Balanced Funds - The portfolio of balanced funds include assets like debt securities,
convertible securities, and equity and preference shares held in a relatively equal
proportion. The objectives of balanced funds are to reward investors with a regular
income, moderate capital appreciation and at the same time minimizing the risk of capital
erosion. Balanced funds are appropriate for conservative investors having a long term
investment horizon.
Growth-and-Income Funds - Funds that combine features of growth funds and income
funds are known as Growth-and-Income Funds. These funds invest in companies having
potential for capital appreciation and those known for issuing high dividends. The level of
risks involved in these funds is lower than growth funds and higher than income funds.
Asset Allocation Funds - Mutual funds may invest in financial assets like equity, debt,
money market or non-financial (physical) assets like real estate, commodities etc.. Asset
allocation funds adopt a variable asset allocation strategy that allows fund managers to
switch over from one asset class to another at any time depending upon their outlook for
specific markets. In other words, fund managers may switch over to equity if they expect
equity market to provide good returns and switch over to debt if they expect debt market
to provide better returns. It should be noted that switching over from one asset class to
another is a decision taken by the fund manager on the basis of his own judgment and
66
understanding of specific markets, and therefore, the success of these funds depends
upon the skill of a fund manager in anticipating market trends.
6. Commodity Funds-Those funds that focus on investing in different commodities (like
metals, food grains, crude oil etc.) or commodity companies or commodity futures
contracts are termed as Commodity Funds. A commodity fund that invests in a single
commodity or a group of commodities is a specialized commodity fund and a commodity
fund that invests in all available commodities is a diversified commodity fund and bears
less risk than a specialized commodity fund. "Precious Metals Fund" and Gold Funds (that
invest in gold, gold futures or shares of gold mines) are common examples of commodity
funds.
7. Real Estate Funds- Funds that invest directly in real estate or lend to real estate
developers or invest in shares/securitized assets of housing finance companies, are
known as Specialized Real Estate Funds. The objective of these funds may be to generate
regular income for investors or capital appreciation.
8. Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) - Exchange Traded Funds provide investors with
combined benefits of a closed-end and an open-end mutual fund. Exchange Traded Funds
follow stock market indices and are traded on stock exchanges like a single stock at index
67
linked prices. The biggest advantage offered by these funds is that they offer
diversification, flexibility of holding a single share at the same time. Recently introduced
in India, these funds are quite popular abroad.
9. Fund of Funds- Mutual funds that do not invest in financial or physical assets, but do
invest in other mutual fund schemes offered by different AMCs, are known as Fund of
Funds. Fund of Funds maintain a portfolio comprising of units of other mutual fund
schemes, just like conventional mutual funds maintain a portfolio comprising of
equity/debt/money market instruments or non financial assets. Fund of Funds provide
investors with an added advantage of diversifying into different mutual fund schemes
with even a small amount of investment, which further helps in diversification of risks.
However, the expenses of Fund of Funds are quite high on account of compounding
expenses of investments into different mutual fund schemes.
Risk Heirarchy of Different Mutual Funds - Thus, different mutual fund schemes are
exposed to different levels of risk and investors should know the level of risks associated
with these schemes before investing. The graphical representation hereunder provides a
68
clearer picture of the relationship between mutual funds and levels of risk associated
with these funds:
69
Research Methodology
In this report two methods of research have been followed:
Primary research
Secondary research
Primary research:
A sample of 100 people from Religare’s clientele base, who had already invested in mutual funds and those who were interested for investment in mutual funds, was taken from Delhi & NCR region and they were asked to fill the questionnaire containing 10 questions which indicated the factors affecting the investors’ decisions while investing in mutual funds. Due to response error, responses of 20 respondents could not be taken into account. So the final sample size is 80.
70
The data collection method used was personal interview.
b) Secondary research:
A samples of top 15 mutual funds from each category of funds was taken and their 3 month, 6 month, 1 year returns were taken for the analysis of return as a factor and similarly Beta ratio and Sharpe ratio’s were taken for the analysis of other factors.
Now, 10 factors indicated in the questionnaire according to which investors invest in mutual funds are:
Age
Source of income
Plans to retire
Returns expected
Number of dependents
Level of knowledge
Level of acceptable risk
Time of investment
Willingness to stay during volatile times
Dependence on funds
So I applied Factor Analysis on the data collected, so as to find out which of these factors are most critical and which are less critical.
Then as a result of factor analysis, the factor which came out to be mostly critical is risk taking ability (as indicated from Age, Level of knowledge, Level of acceptable risk & Willingness to stay during volatile times) and second most critical factor is return over a given period of time (as indicated from plans to retire, returns expected & time of investment) and third is future requirement of funds (as indicated from source of income and no. of dependents).
71
Research
Hypothesis
‘
Since risk taking ability (as indicated from Age, Level of knowledge, Level of acceptable risk & Willingness to stay during volatile times) came out be the most critical factor and in case of mutual funds it is indicated by Beta Factor, So for comparing risk in Equity and Debt funds we assume the null hypothesis:
72
H1: Beta Factor of Equity funds is same as that Debt funds
Now, second most critical Factor came out to be the returns over a given period of time (as indicated from plans to retire, returns expected & time of investment). So we will compare on the basis of their 3 month, 6 month, 1 year returns.
Therefore, we assume the following three hypotheses:
H2 (a): 3 month return of Equity funds is same as that Debt funds
H2 (b): 6 month return of Equity funds is same as that Debt funds
H2 (c): 1 year return of Equity funds is same as that Debt funds
Finally, third most critical Factor came out to be the future requirement of funds (as indicated from source of income and no. of dependents). For that matter Sharp Ratio of Equity and Debt funds can be compared because it indicates the average returns given by the fund over the risk-free rate per unit of market risk (standard deviation).
Therefore, we assume the hypothesis:
H3: Sharp Ratio of Equity funds is same as that Debt funds
Observations
73
Beta factor of Equity and Debt funds are as shown below:
Top 10 equity funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Beta
1 Reliance Diversified Power Sector Fund - Growth 0.44
2 Taurus Libra Taxshield - Growth 0.33
3 DWS Investment Opportunity Fund – G 0.35
4 Reliance Regular Savings Fund – Growth 0.36
5 IDFC premier equity fund-Growth 0.41
6 ICICI Pru Infrastructure fund-Growth 0.36
7 Sundram BNP Paribasselect focus fund- G 0.28
74
8 BOB Grpwth Fund- Growth 0.29
9 SBI magnum comma fund Growth 0.34
10 DWS Alpha Equity Fund- Growth 0.28
Top 10 debt funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Beta
1 DBS Chola Monthly Income Plan - Growth 0.79
2 PRINCIPAL Monthly Income Plan Plus – G 0.93
3 Birla Sun Life Income Plus - Growth 1.38
4 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - 54EA - G 1.05
5 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - 54EB - G 1.05
6 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - Growth 1.05
7 ING Income Fund - Regular Plan - Growth 0.31
8 Birla Sun Life Dynamic Bond Fund - Retail - Growth 0.27
75
9 PRINCIPAL Monthly Income Plan - G 0.64
10 IDFC Dynamic Bond Fund - Plan A - G 1
3 month returns of Equity and Debt funds are as shown below:
Top 15 equity funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Last 3
Months
%
1 Franklin Infotech Fund - Growth 19.44
2 UTI Growth Sector Fund - Pharma and Healthcare -
Growth
16.19
3 JM Healthcare Sector Fund - Growth 15.27
4 SBI Magnum Sector Umbrella - Pharma Fund-G 13.62
5 UTI Growth Sector Fund - Software - Growth 13.36
6 Reliance Pharma Fund - Growth 13.29
7 Franklin Pharma Fund - Growth 13.01
76
8 Tata Life Sciences and Technology Fund 11.75
9 PRINCIPAL Global Opportunities Fund – G 11.42
10 SBI Magnum Sector Umbrella - Infotech Fund 10.2
11 Taurus Libra Taxshield - Growth 9.46
12 Birla Sun Life International Equity Fund-G 8.13
13 ICICI Prudential Technology Fund - Growth 7.29
14 Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Growth 5.31
15 JM Emerging Leaders Fund - Growth 5.26
Top 15 debt funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Last 3
Months
%
1 Tata Fixed Income Portfolio Fund - Series B3 - Retail - G 9.75
2 UTI Fixed Term Income Fund - Series II-Plan 16G 7.56 77
3 Franklin India International Fund 3.76
4 UTI Fixed Maturity Plan - Mar 08 - Harlf Yearly Series - Retail –
G
2.81
5 Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund 7 Series 4 Retail-G 2.75
6 Sundaram BNP Paribas Interval Fund - QS - Plan B - Ret - G 2.73
7 ING Long Term Fixed Maturity Plan - I - Retail - G 2.72
8 Canara Robeco Income Scheme - Growth 2.71
9 DWS Money Plus Advantage Fund - Regular - Growth 2.71
10 Lotus India Quarterly Interval Fund - Plan F - Growth 2.69
11 UTI Fixed Income Interval Fund - Quarterly Plan I – Regular-G 2.68
12 Tata Floating Rate Fund - Long Term - Growth 2.68
13 Tata Fixed Investment Plan 1 - Series A - Regular - Growth 2.66
14 Lotus India Quarterly Interval Fund - Plan D - Growth 2.65
15 Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund 7 - Series 3 - Retail - Growth 2.65
78
6 month returns of Equity and Debt funds are as shown below:
Top 15 equity funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Last 6
Months
%
1 UTI Spread Fund - Growth 4.83
2 HDFC Arbitrage Fund - Institutional - Growth 4.51
3 HDFC Arbitrage Fund - Retail - Growth 4.38
4 Lotus India Arbitrage Fund - Growth 4.37
5 JM Arbitrage Advantage Fund - Growth 4.3
6 ICICI Prudential Blended Plan - Option A - Growth 4.15
7 Kotak Equity Arbitrage Fund - Growth 4.05
8 Benchmark Equity And Derivative Opportunities Fund-G 4.05
9 IDFC Arbitrage Fund - Plan B (Institutional) - Growth 4.03
79
10 SBI Arbitrage Opportunities Fund - Growth 3.98
11 IDFC Arbitrage Fund - Plan A (Regular) - Growth 3.77
12 IDFC Fixed Maturity Arbitrage Fund - S1 - Plan A - G 3.66
13 IDFC Fixed Maturity Arbitrage Fund - S1 - Plan B - G 3.66
14 PRINCIPAL Global Opportunities Fund - Growth 2.31
15 Birla Sun Life International Equity Fund - Plan A - Growth -1.16
Top 15 debt funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Last 6
Months
%
1 DBS Chola Monthly Income Plan - Growth 11.87
2 UTI Fixed Term Income Fund - Series II - Plan 16 (Feb 07) -G 8.22
3 Franklin India International Fund 7.83
4 ABN AMRO Interval Fund - Monthly Plan A - Growth-Red 6.39 80
5 Birla Sun Life Dynamic Bond Fund - Retail - Growth 5.88
6 Kotak Wealth Builder Series I - Growth 5.66
7 ING Income Fund - Regular Plan - Growth 5.63
8 ICICI Prudential Interval Fund II - Quarterly Interval Plan E-G 5.45
9 HDFC Fixed Maturity Plan - 367D - Sep 2007 (6) Retail – G 5.24
10 LIC MF Fixed Maturity Plan - Series 22 - Growth 5.18
11 Sundaram BNP Paribas Interval Fund - QS - Plan B - Ret - G 5.16
12 HDFC Fixed Maturity Plan - 367D (2) - Sep 2007 (6) Retail – G 5.06
13 LIC MF Fixed Maturity Plan - Series 32 ( 13 Months) – G 5.05
14 Lotus India Quarterly Interval Fund - Plan D - Growth 5.05
15 UTI Fixed Income Interval Fund - Quarterly Plan I - Regular -
G
5.02
1year returns of Equity and Debt funds are as shown below:
Top 15 equity funds as on 23/06/2008 are:81
Rank Scheme Name Last 12
Months
%
1 Reliance Diversified Power Sector Fund - Growth 30.52
2 Taurus Libra Taxshield - Growth 22.26
3 DWS Investment Opportunity Fund - Growth 20.18
4 Reliance Regular Savings Fund - Equity - Growth 15.01
5 ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund - FII Growth 14.41
6 IDFC Premier Equity Fund - Growth 13.78
7 ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund - Growth 13.41
8 Sundaram BNP Paribas Select Focus - Growth 13.14
9 BOB Growth Fund - Growth 12.61
10 SBI Magnum COMMA Fund - Growth 12.57
11 DWS Alpha Equity Fund - Growth 11.32
12 HSBC Equity Fund - Growth 10.51
13 PRINCIPAL Global Opportunities Fund - Growth 10.48
82
14 Templeton India Equity Income Fund - Growth 9.54
15 UTI Spread Fund - Growth 9.09
Top 15 debt funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Last 12
Months
%
1 DBS Chola Monthly Income Plan - Growth 24.38
2 PRINCIPAL Monthly Income Plan Plus - Growth 12.63
3 Birla Sun Life Income Plus - Growth 12.28
4 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - 54EA - Growth 11.8
5 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - 54EB - Growth 11.8
6 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - Growth 11.8
83
7 ING Income Fund - Regular Plan - Growth 11.3
8 Birla Sun Life Dynamic Bond Fund - Retail - Growth 11.06
9 PRINCIPAL Monthly Income Plan - Growth 10.99
10 Sundaram BNP Paribas FTP - Series XIII - (30 Months) - Growth 10.89
11 LIC MF Fixed Maturity Plan - Series 22 - Growth 10.79
12 Sundaram BNP Paribas FTP - Series XII - (18 Months) - Growth 10.71
13 IDFC Dynamic Bond Fund - Plan A - Growth 10.63
14 HDFC Fixed Maturity Plan - 24M - May 2007 (5) Retail - Growth 10.47
15 JM Fixed Maturity Fund - Series IV - 15 Months Plan 2 - Growth 10.28
Sharpe ratio of Equity and Debt funds is as shown below:
Top 15 equity funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name Sharp
84
ratio
1 Reliance Diversified Power Sector Fund - Growth 0.85
2 Taurus Libra Taxshield - Growth 0.96
3 DWS Investment Opportunity Fund - Growth 0.96
4 Reliance Regular Savings Fund - Growth 0.83
5 IDFC premeir equity fund-Growth 0.76
6 ICICI Pru Infrastructure fund-Growth 0.93
7 Sundram BNP Paribasselect focus fund- Growth 1.13
8 BOB Grpwth Fund- Growth 0.91
9 SBI magnum comma fund Growth 0.92
10 DWS Alpha Equity Fund- Growth 0.96
Top 15 debt funds as on 23/06/2008 are:
Rank Scheme Name
Sharp
ratio
85
1 DBS Chola Monthly Income Plan - Growth 0.23
2 PRINCIPAL Monthly Income Plan Plus - Growth 0.47
3 Birla Sun Life Income Plus - Growth 0.3
4 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - 54EA - Growth 0.39
5 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - 54EB - Growth 0.39
6 Birla Sun Life Income Fund - Growth 0.39
7 ING Income Fund - Regular Plan - Growth 0.21
8 Birla Sun Life Dynamic Bond Fund - Retail - Growth 0.44
9 PRINCIPAL Monthly Income Plan - Growth 0.49
10 IDFC Dynamic Bond Fund - Plan A - Growth 0.27
86
RESULTS
Testing of H1:
Ho: Beta (Equity funds) = Beta (Debt funds)
H1: Beta (Equity funds) > Beta (Debt funds)
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
87
Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 0.344 0.847
Variance 0.00283 0.122823
Observations 10 10
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 9
t Stat -4.48732
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.00076
t Critical one-tail 1.83311
Here, calculated t18(0.05) = -4.48732
and, tabulated t18(0.05) = 1.83311
Now since, t calculated < t tabulated
Therefore, null hypothesis is accepted i.e. beta of Equity funds is not greater than Debt funds, which means Equity funds are more volatile than Debt funds.
Therefore, Equity funds are more risky as compared to Debt funds.
88
Testing of H2 (a):
Ho: 3 month Average Returns (Equity funds) = 3 month Average Returns (Debt funds)
H1: 3 month Average Returns (Equity funds) > 3 month Average Returns (Debt funds)
Proof: Now applying t-test,
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 11.53333333 3.567333333
Variance 16.06638095 4.513235238
Observations 15 15
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 21
t Stat 6.800914205
P(T<=t) one-tail 5.01266E-07
t Critical one-tail 1.720742871
89
Here, calculated t = 6.8009
and tabulated t= 1.7207
Now since, calculated t28(0.05) > tabulated t28(0.05)
Therefore, null hypothesis is not accepted i.e. 3 month average Returns of Equity funds are greater than Debt funds.
Testing of H2 (b):
Ho: 6 month Average Returns (Debt funds) = 6 month Average Returns (Equity funds)
H1: 6 month Average Returns (Debt funds) > 6 month Average Returns (Equity funds)
Proof: Now applying t-test,
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 6.179333333 3.659333333
Variance 3.469849524 2.098149524
Observations 15 15
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
90
Df 26
t Stat 4.136152989
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.000163761
t Critical one-tail 1.705617901
Here, calculated t = 4.1361
and tabulated t = 1.70561
Now since, calculated t28(0.05)> tabulated t28(0.05)
Therefore, null hypothesis is not accepted i.e. 6 month average Returns of Debt funds are greater than Equity funds.
Testing of H2 (c):
Ho: 1 year Average Returns (Equity funds) = 1 year Average Returns (Debt funds)
H1: 1 year Average Returns (Equity funds) > 1 year Average Returns (Debt funds)
Proof: Now applying t-test,
T-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
91
Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 14.58866667 12.12066667
Variance 32.58474095 11.96939238
Observations 15 15
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 23
t Stat 1.43201242
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.082795547
t Critical one-tail 1.713871517
Here, calculated t = 1.43201
and tabulated t = 1.71387
Now since, t28(0.05) calculated < t28(0.05) tabulated
92
Therefore, null hypothesis is accepted i.e. 1 year average Returns of Equity funds are equal to Debt funds.
Testing of H3:
Ho: Sharpe Ratio (Equity funds) = Sharpe Ratio (Debt funds)
H1: Sharpe Ratio (Equity funds) > Sharpe Ratio (Debt funds)
Proof: Now applying t-test,
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 0.921 0.358
Variance 0.009743333 0.009906667
Observations 10 10
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
Df 18
t Stat 12.7006842
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.00668E-10
t Critical one-tail 1.734063592
93
Here, calculated t = 12.70068
and tabulated t = 1.734063
Now since, calculated t18(0.05) > tabulated t18(0.05)
Therefore, null hypothesis is rejected i.e. on an average Sharpe Ratio of Equity funds is greater than Debt funds.
ANALYSIS
94
Analysis of Hypothesis H1
From the Results of hypothesis H(1) it was found that Risk is more in Equity funds as
compared to Debt funds.
Risk is one of the important factor during investments. Each investor has great
importance for it.
Risk is also considered as more in equity funds as compared to debt funds due to many
reasons. One of the major reason is that most of these funds invest a big portion of
investments in equity and equity market is always more volatile as compared to risk in
debt funds. But in equity Sector funds, Thematic funds and aggervisely managed funds
are considered as more risky as compared to Balanced funds and Tax Planning funds
because these funds concentrate more on return for a particular level of risk.
Risk in Equity funds
Sector funds or sector-specific funds have a mandate to invest in just one sector. In the
past, particularly during the TMT (technology/media/telecom) boom in 1999-early 2000,
there was a flood of sector funds targeting the technology/software sector. Apart from
this, there were already some sector funds in place with the mandate to invest in the
FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) and pharma sectors. avoid sector funds, unless you
have a view on the sector and know exactly when to invest in it and exit from it. Sector
95
funds are high risk investment avenues and over the long term (3-5 years) they rarely
outperform well-managed diversified equity funds.
Thematic funds invest in a theme rather than in a single sector. So while the fund manager’s investment options remained restricted to the theme, he still has several sectors to choose from within that theme. A theme like infrastructure for instance, has several related sectors like cement, steel, capital goods/engineering as also unrelated sectors like banking and finance. When it comes to stock-picking, this gives the fund manager more flexibility when he is managing a thematic fund as compared to a sector fund. We can’t think of a single theme that is so enduring that it will make the fund manager forget every other theme till the time that fund is in existence
A well-managed diversified equity which usually never invests more than 5% in a single stock, compared to other which has even 31.9% in its leading stock . So these types of funds which invest aggressively for higher returns are more risky as compared to the equity diversified funds
The benchmark for evaluating the diversification of an equity fund’s stock portfolio is to assess the concentration of assets in the top 10 stocks. If the top 10 stocks account for less than 40% of net assets (which is also a global benchmark), the fund is well-diversified in our view.
Risk in Debt funds
Such misconceptions that debt funds carry low risk catch out the investors. Consider a situation when the oil price is galloping past $30 a barrel. The demand for dollars to pay for oil imports pulls down the rupee value. The RBI, in all likelihood, will step in to defend the rupee, and that means hiking short-term interest rates. Now, a hike in rates means lower bond prices because of the inverse price-yield relationship (bond prices fall when rates rise and prices rise when rates fall). A consequent drop in the NAV will hit the unwary unit-holder where he sits.
Debt funds primarily face two types of risk. First of a fall in market price due to demand-
supply factor. And, second, of a fall in market price due to rise in interest rates.
Market risk
Consider the market risk. Bond prices, like all instruments, are predicated on the principle
of demand and supply. This means that bond prices will fall when supply is relatively
96
more than demand. This typically happens when the rupee is falling sharply against the
dollar, or when the call rates are very high. At such times, banks, the biggest investors in
the bond market, sell to generate rupee resources. The excess supply of bonds in the
market pulls down bond prices and, consequently, the NAVs of debt funds.
Interest-rate risk
Debt funds also carry interest rate risk. This is the risk that bond prices will fall because of
a change in the interest rates. Interest rates have an inverse relationship on the price of
debt securities. If the rates rise, their prices fall to adjust for the current yield, and vice
versa.
If a fund holds a large portfolio with securities of longer maturities, the impact on NAV is
usually negative when rat As interest rates harden, short-term debt funds have the least
impact on NAV es rise, and vice versa. So the risk associated with investments in debt
funds is lower than that in equity funds but the absolute risk is certainly not modest.
Analysis of hypothesis H2(A):
From the Results of hypothesis H2(A) it was found that On an Average 3 month returns
are more for Equity as compared to Debt funds.
There are very few funds that have managed to buck the trend. ICICI Prudential FMCG
Fund stands out as a rare, hard-to-find exception, the returns from which not only beat
the market but also the Bombay Stock Exchange’s index tracking the fast moving
consumer goods stock over the last three years. While the BSE FMCG Index climbed only 97
29 per cent, the fund rose over 41 per cent over the same period. Rival funds — Franklin
FMCG and Magnum FMCG — posted returns of barely 26 per cent and 15 per cent,
respectively.
The information and technology sector funds are the only sets that have beaten both the Sensex and the BSE IT Index over the last five years. This is not really hard to explain given that the Indian stock market has all along been rather fond of tech stocks, barring a few short intervals of indifference or rejection.
According to data on the performance of mutual funds and the sector indices sourced from Value Research for the last three years, the two auto funds — from JM and UTI — on offer, for instance, have not quite outperformed the BSE Auto index or the broader market spectacularly. While, JM Auto Fund has yielded returns of 20 per cent over the last three years, the UTI Auto Fund has barely given gains of 9 per cent to its investors. In sharp comparison, the BSE Auto Index grew 20 per cent during the same period.
The Sensex, on the other hand, climbed almost 40 per cent in the last three years.
The story remains the same in the case of bank funds. The BSE Bankex rose 43 per cent in the last three years. The only two bank funds available in the mutual fund market — Reliance Banking and UTI Banking Sector — have underperformed the BSE Bankex. While Reliance Banking grew by 38 per cent, UTI banking Sector fared only marginally better with gains of 40 per cent. The mutual fund schemes built around the pharmaceuticals sector too have failed to outdo either the broad market or the Bombay Stock Exchange’s index for the pharmaceuticals sector over the last three years.
Funds dedicated to banking, automobiles and pharmaceuticals have generally taken big hits, with FMCG and technology funds managing to scrape through relatively easily.
The figures speak for themselves. As on June 26, the three-month performance charts put banking funds at a negative 19.6 per cent. Pharma and auto funds have delivered minus 17.89 per cent and minus 16.56 per cent respectively during this period.
In comparison, index funds have done decidedly better, with their average score being minus 9.56 per cent. The `normal' broad-based funds, typically benchmarked against the Nifty, are relatively worse off with minus 14.81 per cent. These numbers have been collated by Value Research.
A small section in the sectoral category has turned in uninspiring performance even if longer time-frame is considered, MF circles agree. Reliance Banking Fund, for instance, has provided a negative 5.25 per cent on a one-year basis. This, when even the most pedestrian performers among the diversified schemes have given at least 10 per cent - 98
except odd names such as Reliance Regular Savings Equity and Taurus Discovery Stock. The latter, currently among the worst cases, has provided a meager 2.02 per cent on a one-year basis.
99
Analysis Of Hypothesis H2 (B)
From the Results of hypothesis H2(A) it was found that On an Average 6 month returns
are more for Debt as compared to Equity funds.
In the last 6 months Indian securities market faced a lot of shocks and that is major
reason that in the last six months equity funds performance is very bad.
One another reason was that January- march 2008 quarter was the worst quarter for
equity funds in the last decade since January 2001.
Wrost Quarter for the Equity funds in a decade
On March 31, 2008, Indian mutual funds ended their worst quarter of the decade. The average
returns of almost all categories of equity funds had their worst three months since January
2001, according to the quarterly review of fund performance released by Value Research.
Funds in the key ‘Diversified Equity' category, which has the largest number of funds (194) as
well as the highest investor interest, lost an average of 28.3 per cent. This was far worse than
the previous worst of the decade, when these funds lost 16.9 per cent in Q1 of 2001.
Individual funds in the category lost between 16.2 per cent and 40.6 per cent between January
and March this year, during which BSE Sensex and the NSE Nifty both lost 22.9 per cent.
100
While equity funds registered staggering losses on an absolute basis, they did substantially
worse than their benchmark indices too. Of the 277 equity funds (which includes diversified
equity as well as other categories) that were part of this study, only 35 outperformed their
benchmarks while 242 failed to do so.
What's worse, of the 35 which beat the benchmark, a mere seven managed to do so by a
margin greater than five per cent. At the other end of the scale, as many as 142 funds
underperformed their benchmarks by more than five per cent.
Funds in the ‘diversified equity' category gained an average of 21.4 per cent over the four
quarters, with individual schemes' returns ranging from a gain of 53.7 per cent to a loss of 7.9
per cent.
FUNDS ON LIQUID DIET
Once overweight on equities and neutral on cash, mutual funds seem to have reversed that
position. Welcome to the new world of cash stash.
A look at the equity portfolios of March 2008 reveals that funds are on a strict liquid diet. As on
March 31, Sundaram BNP Paribas Capex had 30 per cent of its assets in cash, followed by LICMF
101
Growth with 29.47 per cent.
The cash position of these two schemes during the peak of bull run (January 2008) was 9 per
cent for LICMF Growth and 7 per cent for that of Sundaram BNP Paribas Capex.
As on March 2008, diversified equity funds were sitting on a cash pile of Rs 7,859 crore, as
against Rs 4,773 crore in January 2008. A total of 108 funds increased their cash allocation
expressed as percentage of net assets, while 33 saw a decline.
While sitting on cash protects the investor from a sharp downfall, it also implies that you miss
out on sudden upward spurt; a phenomenon which has now become a part and parcel of Indian
equity markets.
Increase in Inflation due to Commodity and Oil prices
Soaring food prices are also stoking inflation in India, where more than half the population of
1.1 billion survive on less than $2 a day. Food product costs, including bread, salt, cooking oil
and tea, jumped 14 percent in the week to June 14 from a year earlier, according to today's
report. Fuel price inflation rose 16.4 percent in the week ended June 14 from a year earlier.
India on June 4 raised retail prices of fuels for the second time this year. Higher fuel prices led
102
to higher transportation costs, making manufactured products and food items more expensive.
The index of manufactured products, which has a 64 percent weight in the inflation basket, rose
9.7 percent.
The FAO food price index, which includes national prices as well as those in cross-border trade,
suggests that the average index for 2007 was nearly 25 per cent above the average for 2006.
Apart from sugar, nearly every other food crop has shown very significant increases in price in
world trade over 2007, and the latest evidence suggests that this trend has continued and even
accelerated in the first few months of 2008. The net result is that globally the prices of many
basic commodities have been rising faster than they ever did during the last three decades.
Others reasons for the rise of commodities price
1. There are more than just demand forces at work, although it is certainly true that rising
incomes in Asia and other parts of the developing world have led to increased demand for food.
There is the impact of high oil prices, which affect agricultural costs directly because of the
significance of energy as an input in the cultivation process itself (through fertiliser and
irrigation costs) as well as in transporting food.
There is the impact of both oil prices and government policies in the US, Europe, Brazil and
elsewhere that have promoted bio-fuels as an alternative to petroleum. This has led to
significant shifts in acreage as well as use of certain grains. , in 2006 the US diverted more than
20 per cent of its maize production to the production of ethanol; Brazil used half of its
103
sugarcane production to make bio-fuel, and the European Union used the greater part of its
vegetable oil production as well as imported vegetable oils, to make bio-fuel. This has naturally
reduced the available land for producing food.
Increased investment in Commodity an oil market
It is known that energy markets have attracted substantial financial investor interest since
2004, but especially after the recent decline in stock markets and in the value of the dollar.
Investors in search of new investment targets have moved into speculative investments in
commodities in general and oil in particular. The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC), which is normally held responsible for all oil price increases, has repeatedly
asserted that oil has crossed the $100-a-barrel mark not because of a shortage of supply but
because of financial speculation.
since the past few years, the US financial sector has begun to turn its attention from currency and stock markets to commodity markets. According to The Economist, about $260 billion has been invested into the commodity market -- up nearly 20 times from what it was in 2003.
Coinciding with a weak dollar and this speculative interest of the US financial sector, prices of commodities have soared globally.
And most of these investments are bets placed by hedge and pension funds, always on the lookout for risky but high-yielding investments. What is indeed interesting to note here is that unlike margin requirements for stocks which are as high as 50 per cent in many markets, the margin requirements for commodities is a mere 5-7 per cent.
This implies that with an outlay of a mere $260 billion these speculators would be able to take positions of approximately $5 trillion -- yes, $5 trillion! -- in the futures markets. It is estimated that half of these are bets placed on oil.
104
Analysis for hypothesis H2(C):
From the Results of hypothesis H2(C) it was found that On an Average 12 month returns are
same both for Equity and Debt funds.
In the last 12 months Indian securities market were very volatile. There were many reasons for
this volatility but the main impact was due to global cues. Some of them are:
1) Foreign investors are exiting from market because of US recession.
2) Indian MFs are sitting on huge cash and waiting with patience to enter once the market
stabilizes.
3) Retail investors are out of market in fear of more down trends.
A)Sub Prime Crisis - One of the major reasons for that was the impact of Sub Prime crisis in the
United States w The main channels through which a global credit crunch and a recession in the
US can affect India are: (i) a decline in capital inflows and lower corporate access to credit in
international markets; (ii) slowdown in exports of goods and services from India to the US;
105
Which not only impact the Indian markets as well as others in the Global market.
When crisis (has) moved from the subprime mortgage market to the housing market, and now the housing market to the credit market, there is impact upon India. There is impact in terms of credit flows and financial flows.
ICICI Bank has lost as much as $264 million up until January due to its exposure in the overseas
credit derivatives markets, other banks are also facing significant losses. The total global write-
downs are expected to be around $1 trillion (IMF estimates) of which the banks have so far
written down around $200 billion.
Analysts note that the total mark-to-market losses of corporate India’s exposure in the foreign exchange derivatives market could be in the region of $5 billion.
One possible impact of US subprime crisis on global markets would be certain unforeseen
losses pertaining to securities. If such a situation arises, it would further make credit conditions
stringent. Consequently, loss incurred on securities would increase.
The Indian companies engaged in business processes such as mortgage documentation have
seen a decline in work orders and loss of revenues as U.S. lenders have tightened their
exposure to credit market. The Indian IT industry, which derives about 65% of its revenues from
the U.S. market, will also be adversely affected. The National Association of Software and
Services Companies (NASSCOM) has assumed that Indian information technology (IT) and
business process outsourcing (BPO) industries may slip down to 3-4 percent in growth rate in
the current fiscal as against that of last year. The major cause behind the slowdown would be
uncertainty in the global economy and frequent fluctuation in Dollar that play a major role in IT
106
and related industries.
B) Turmoil in the global financial currency markets has started affecting Indian companies and
the stock market..
C) Inflation and Oil Price
The Indian economy showed signs of overheating in mid-2007, with inflation rising above 6%.
Although the central bank has pursued a tight monetary policy, inflation has recently risen
above 7%.
India's inflation accelerated again in the week ended 14 June, hitting the fastest pace in 13
years, and suggesting there may well be more interest rate increases to come from the central
bank. Wholesale prices rose 11.42 percent in the week to June 14, following an 11.05 percent
rate in the previous week.
107
South Asian countries are facing more serious problems associated with global external shocks
such as increasing oil and food prices, as well as country-specific “shocks” such as escalating
conflicts or political turmoil.
D) Slowdown in Manufacturing Factor
Recent domestic economic data in Feb 2008 clearly indicates that there are signs of slowdown
in the manufacturing sector, significantly in automobile and consumer durables.
During the last year, one of the major factors responsible for the negative growth in the
108
automotive sector is the high interest rate.
the adverse impact of high interest rate has brought down the growth of consumer durables
sector which has restricted the manufacturing sector’s growth.
FICCI observed that for the last two quarters of July-September and October-December 2007,
manufacturing sector witnessed a slowdown and the main reason behind the slowdown is the
negative growth of consumer durable sector for the period April-Jan 2007-08. The slowdown in
electricity generation and the capital good sector in the month of January 2008 is also a cause
for worry for the manufacturing sector. The slowdown in power generation could constrain the
growth of manufacturing sector in the coming months, FICCI said. The current slowdown would
make it difficult to increase the share of manufacturing in our economy from the current 16%
to 25%.
Analysis of Hypothesis H3:
From the Results of hypothesis H(3) it was found that sharpe ratio is more in Equity funds as 109
compared to Debt funds.
SHARPE RATIO- The Sharpe ratio is a portfolio performance measure used to evaluate the
return of a fund with respect to risk. The calculation is the return of the fund minus the "risk-
free" rate divided by the fund's standard deviation. The Sharpe ratio provides you with a return
for unit of risk measure.
By using the risk return relationship, we try to access the competitive strength of the mutual
funds vis-à-vis one another in a better way. A mutual fund may be ranked high both in terms of
returns and risk-adjusted returns, but the important thing is that the investor should be aware
of the level of risk. Also, performance in the scale of returns alone may not tally with the
performance in terms of risk adjusted returns. Therefore, we can say that without taking into
account the risk aspect it is not possible to find out the actual performance of any mutual fund.
The risk return relationship proves that the funds taking higher (lower) amount of risk should
give higher (lower) returns, if fund managers' skills are the same.
Generally the primary objective of the investors of equity funds is to maximize returns at a
particular level of risk. His expected returns from the funds that are taking different level of risk
are different. So, the fund manager's efficiency should be governed by the return given by the
funds over and above the expected return of the funds at the level of risk associated with it
Sharpe ratio takes into account total risk (market risk plus sector/stock risk).
The Sharpe ratio tells us whether a portfolio’s returns are due to smart investment decisions or
a result of excess risk. Essentially, use this to figure out if higher returns come with additional 110
risk. The higher the ratio, the better the portfolio’s risk-adjusted performance has been.
111
Conclusion
Conclusion
From the factor analysis i found that risk ability including level of knowledge, Age and
investment during volatile times is the most important factor during investment decisions.
During investment in mutual funds risk can be of any kind, in the case of Equity funds risk can
be of two types (i) Market Risk (ii) Sector risk. In equity funds if we take the example of sector
funds, thematic funds and aggressively managed funds and on the other hand balanced funds
112
and Equity diversified funds, then the risk is more in the former type of equity funds.
Similarly in case of Debt funds there are also two types of risk (i) Market risk (ii) Interest rate
risk. Market risk is due to the increase or decrease in demand and supply of bonds in the debt
market which affects the NAV of the fund and Interest rate risk is due to the fluctuation of the
interest rate in the market because of inverse relationship with the yield. The interest rate risk
affects more to long term bonds as compared to short term bonds.
From the results of hypothesis H2(b) and H2(c) it is found that in the volatile conditions in the
global and domestic market debt funds done well in last six months as compared to equity
funds but in three months their performance was not up to the mark because of a lot of
fluctuation in interest rates to curb the inflation which was as high as 11.42%.
In last six months equity funds did not perform well as compared to returns in last three
months equity funds, the major reason was that in last three months the performance was little
good due to some sector funds such as Pharma and technology and other reason was that
valuations are very high before six months as compared to last three months.
From the results of hypothesis i can conclude that in a volatile period Debt short term funds
such as fixed term maturity plans and Floating rate funds are better as compared Debt long
term funds because these short term funds focused on generating expected return in short
term by investing regularly in short term securities such as short term bonds and money market
instruments.
It is being analysed that in the bullish market many of the investors get influenced by the higher 113
returns of the equity funds and invests in such funds at higher level of risk.
If i compare the three year returns of the Equity and Debt funds, it is being analysed that equity
funds perform very well as compared to debt funds. But if i compare the volatility of equity and
debt funds with their benchmarks (Beta ratio), the equity funds are more volatile as compared
to debt funds.
Recommendation
In Equity funds, Sector funds are suitable for those aggressive customers who have the
114
knowledge for that sector and can understand when to enter and exit from these funds.
As far as Equity diversified and tax planning are concerned, they can be preferred by those
aggressive customers who want to invest for long term because these kind of funds invest in
different sectors. So even during volatile times, even if a particular sector doesn’t perform well,
others can compensate for that. Moreover, since aggressive customers take more risk, they get
good returns for that since in long term equity funds give good returns.
Balanced Funds can be preferred by moderate customers with medium to long term
investment because these funds invest in equity and some portion in debt and other
instruments but it will be good for moderate customers if asset allocation in equity funds is not
more than 65% of the total portfolio.
In debt funds, income funds and Monthly income funds are preferred by those conservative
customers who need regular income on a monthly or Quarterly basis to fulfil their needs
because these funds provide regular income and invest in fixed government securities, bonds
and a small portion in equity.
In volatile times, short term debt funds such as fixed term maturity funds and floating rate
funds can be preferred by conservative and moderate customers for short to medium term
investment because investment in these funds gets adjusted according to market
fluctuation( change in interest rates).
115
Abstract
Mutual Fund industry has witnessed a boom since 1990s. The Asset Under Management has multiplied many times. Still there exist a lot of potential for the growth of industry. The income level of urban & middle class people is increasing these days and these people are saving part of their income to invest in profitable instruments. There are various number of ways in which you can invest your money, including mutual funds, stocks, bonds. But no other investment vehicle can offer you as wide an array of advantage as mutual funds.
In this project I have tried to find the most critical factors affecting the investors’ decisions while investing in mutual funds and analyze various types of mutual funds so as to find out which type of funds better serve the needs of investors.
Bibliography
116
Online Websites
WWW.Mutualfundina.com
www.thefinancialexpress.com
www.moneycontrol.com
www.valueresearchonline.com
www.religare.in
www.religaresecurities.com
WWW.thehindubusinessonline.com
WWW.businessstandard.com
WWW.capitalmarket.com
WWW.businessworld.in
WWW.hinduonnet.com
117
WWW.personalfn.com
WWW.businessgyan.com
WWW.indianrealtynews.com
WWW.siliconindia.com
Newspaper
The Financial Express
The Economic Times
Magzines
The Mutual Fund Insight
118
119
Appendices
Questionnaire
120
121
122
123
SPSS Results
124
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
125
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Rotated Component Matrixa
Component
126
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
1 2 3 4
Age .409 .352 .247 -.275
127
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Income .039 .073 .880 -.182
Retirement .332 .800 .102 -.077
128
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Returns .464 .689 .295 .238
Dependents -.094 -.441 .503 .486
129
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Knowledge .772 .055 -.339 .023
Risk .765 .314 .149 .347
130
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Time -.064 .755 -.159 .090
Volatility .840 .077 .116 -.076
131
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Dependence .088 .137 -.179 .864
132
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
133
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
a. Rotation converged in 8 iterations.
134
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Age 1.000 .427
Income 1.000 .815
Retirement 1.000 .767
Returns 1.000 .834
Dependents 1.000 .692
Knowledge 1.000 .714
Risk 1.000 .828
Time 1.000 .608
Volatility 1.000 .731
Dependence 1.000 .806
135
136
137