A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

11
Optical and Quantum Electronics 1 0 (19 78) 211-221 A simplified approach to digital optical receiver design D. R. SMITH, I. GARRETT Post Office Research Centre, Mart/esham Heath, Ipswich IP5 7RE, England Received 10 October 1977 A simplified theory for the perform ance of a digital optical receiver is developed. The receiver sensitivity is calculated in terms of circuit parameters, received and equalized pulse shapes, photod iode parameters and bit-rate. An excellent agreement between this theory and a more complicated analysis by Personick [4] is dem onstrated. It is shown that the receiver sensitivity may be improved by launching reduced-width pulses into the fibre, particularly if fibre bandwidth is a significant limitation. Reduced- width pulses bring benefits in source power consumption and lifetime, and in timing recovery. 1. Introduction The sensitivity of an optical receiver using an avalanche photodiode depends on a balance between signal-dependent and signal-independent noise. This problem has been discussed by several authors [1-4], of whom Personick [4], gives a detailed and comprehensive analysis. Unfortunately, deriving the shot noise at the decision time leads to expressions which are not simple to evaluate. In view of the approxim ations used in expressing the excess multiplication noise and in calculating error rates it was felt that a simplification of the treatment of shot noise would be justified and could lead to a theory of optical receiver design which would be easier to apply to practical systems. We have achieved such a simplification, with an inaccuracy which is negligible in view of other assumptions made, by relating the shot noise to the average photocurrent over the bit-time. We compare the results of our treatment with those of Personick [4] and show that the maximum disagreement is only 0.6 dB in received optical power. We then use our theory to find the optimum launched pulse width from a source such as a semiconductor laser, which degrades at a rate depending on the emitted power. We show that using reduced-w idth pulses permits the noise-equivalent bandwidth of the receiver to be reduced and consequently the receiver sensitivity is increased. 2 . Theory 2.1. The optical receiver The basic receiver is shown as a block diagram in Fig. 1, which also shows the important noise sources. We can represent the binary digital pulse stream incident on the photodiode by [5 ] : p(t) = ~ b~hp(t-- nT) where p(t) is the received optical power, T is the bit-time and hp(t) is the pulse shape. The amplitude parameter, bn, can take two values ben and boer corresponding to ON and OFF pulses, respectively. We take ;_~hp(t) dt= 1 so that b n is the energy in the n m pulse. The mean output current from the photodiode at time t is: 9 1978 Chapman and Hall Ltd. Printed i n Great Britain. 2 1 1

Transcript of A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

Page 1: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 1/11

Opt ica l and Quantum E lec t ron ics 10 ( 1 9 7 8) 2 1 1 - 2 2 1

A s i m p l i f i e d a p p r o a c h t o d i g i t a l o p t i c a lr e c e i v e r d e s i g n

D . R . S M I T H , I . G A R R E T T

Post Off ice Research Ce ntre, Mart/esham Heath, Ipswich IP5 7RE, England

Received 10 Oc tobe r 197 7

A s i m p l i f i e d t h e o ry f o r t h e p e r f o rm a n c e o f a d i g i t a l o p t i c a l r e c e i v e r is d e v e l o p e d . Th e re c e i v e r s e n s i t i v i t y

is c a l c u l a t e d i n t e rm s o f c i r c u i t p a ra m e t e r s , r e c e i ve d a n d e q u a l i z e d p u l s e s h a pe s , p h o t o d i o d e p a ra m e t e r s

a n d b i t- r a te . A n e x c e l l e n t a g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n t h is t h e o r y a n d a m o r e c o m p l i c a te d a n aly sis b y

Pe rs o n i c k [ 4 ] is d e m o n s t ra t e d . I t is s h o wn t h a t t h e r e c e i v e r s e n s i t i v i t y m a y b e i m p ro v e d b y l a u n c h i n g

r e d u c e d - w i d t h p u ls es i n t o t h e f ib r e , p a r t i c u l a r l y i f f i b r e b a n d w i d t h is a s i g n i fi c a n t l i m i t a t i o n . R e d u c e d -w i d t h p u ls es b r in g b e n e f i t s in s o u rc e p o w e r c o n s u m p t i o n a n d l i fe t i m e , a n d i n t i m i n g r e c o v e r y .

1 . I n t r o d u c t i o n

Th e sen s i t i v i ty o f an o p t i ca l r eceiv e r u s in g an av a lan ch e p h o t o d io d e d ep en d s o n a b a l an ce b e tw een

s ig n a l - d ep en d en t an d s ig n a l - in d ep en d en t n o i se . Th i s p r o b lem h as b een d i scu ssed b y sev e r a l au th o r s

[ 1 - 4 ] , o f wh o m Pe r so n ick [ 4 ] , gives a d e t a il ed an d co m p r eh en s iv e an a ly s i s . Un f o r tu n a te ly , d e r iv in g

th e sh o t n o i se a t t h e d ec i s io n t im e l ead s to ex p r e ss io n s wh ich a r e n o t s im p le to ev a lu a t e . I n v i ew o f t h e

ap p r o x im a t io n s u sed in ex p r e ss in g th e ex cess m u l t ip l i ca t io n n o i se an d in ca l cu lat in g e r r o r r a t e s i t was

f e l t t h a t a s im p l i f i ca t io n o f th e t r e a tm en t o f sh o t n o i se wo u ld b e ju s t i f i ed an d co u ld l ead to a t h eo r y o f

o p t i ca l r ece iv e r d es ig n wh ich w o u ld b e ea s i e r t o a p p ly to p r ac t i ca l sy s t em s .W e h av e ach iev ed su ch a s im p l i f i ca t io n , w i th an in accu r a cy wh ich i s neg l ig ib le i n v i ew o f o th e r

a s s u m p t i o n s m a d e , b y r e l a ti n g t he s h o t n o i s e t o t h e a v e ra g e p h o t o c u r r e n t o v e r t h e b i t - ti m e . W e c o m p a r e

t h e r e s u lt s o f o u r t r e a t m e n t w i t h t h o s e o f P e r s o n i c k [ 4] a n d s h o w t h a t t h e m a x i m u m d i s a g re e m e n t is

o n l y 0 . 6 dB i n r e c ei v e d o p t i c a l p o w e r . W e th e n u s e o u r t h e o r y t o f i nd t h e o p t i m u m l a u n c h e d p u ls e

wid th f r o m a so u r ce su ch a s a sem ico n d u c to r l a se r , wh ich d eg r ad es a t a r a t e d ep en d in g o n th e em i t t ed

p o w er . W e sh o w th a t u s in g r ed u ced - w id th p u l se s p e r m i t s t h e n o i se - eq u iv a len t b an d w id th o f th e r ece iv e r

to b e r ed u ced an d c o n se q u en t ly th e r ece iv e r sen s i t i v i ty i s i n c r eased .

2 . T h e o r y

2 . 1 . T h e o p t i c a l r e c e i v e r

Th e b as i c r ece iv e r i s sh o w n a s a b lo ck d i ag r am in F ig . 1 , wh ich a l so sh o ws th e im p o r t an t n o i se so u r ces .

W e can r ep r e sen t t h e b i n a r y d ig i t al p u l se s t r eam in c id en t o n th e p h o to d io d e b y [ 5 ] :

p ( t ) = ~ b ~ h p ( t - - n T )

w h e r e p ( t ) i s t h e r ece iv ed o p t i ca l p o wer , T i s t h e b i t - t im e an d h p ( t ) i s t h e p u l se sh ap e . Th e am p l i tu d e

p a r a m e t e r , b n , c a n t a k e t w o v a lu e s b e n a n d b o e r c o r r e s p o n d i n g to O N a n d O F F p u l s e s, re s p e c ti v e ly .

W e t ak e

; _ ~ h p ( t ) d t = 1

s o t h a t b n i s t h e e n e r g y in th e n m p u l se . Th e m ea n o u tp u t cu r r en t f r o m th e p h o to d i o d e a t t im e t is :

9 1978 Chapman and Hall Ltd. Printed in Great Britain. 211

Page 2: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 2/11

D. R . S mi th , L Garret t

D e t e c t o r a n d b i a s A m p l i f i e r

Cd R b i b ( t ) R A CAh p ( t )

r

~e A ~ E q u a l i s e r

r - -~.- i v ~

i A ( t ) ~ >I " - - h a u l ( t )

Heq(f)

L H B I f ' ) ,

F i g u r e 1 A s c h e m a t i c d i a g r a m o f a n o p ti c a l r e c ei v er s h o w i n g c i rc u it c o m p o n e n t s a n d n o is e s o ur c e s.

T/eip ( t ) = ~-~#p( t )

w h e r e # i s t h e m e a n a v a l a n c h e g ai n , ~ is t h e q u a n t u m e f f i c ie n c y a n d h ~ i s t h e p h o t o n e n e r g y . T h i s

c u r r e n t c a u s e s a m e a n v o l t a g e a t t h e o u t p u t o f t h e e q u a l i z a t io n n e t w o r k g i v e n b y :

A T eVout(t) = ~ - gp ( t ) * h a ( t )* he q( t)

w h e r e

[ ' ]ha( t ) = g ( l / R ) +j27rfC

i .e . , h a ( t ) i s t he im pul se r e spo nse o f t he b i a s c i rc u i t a nd a mp l i f i e r, C be ing CA + Cb , ~ : i nd i c a t e s Fou r i e r

t r a n s f o r m a n d * d e n o t e s c o n v o l u t i o n . H e r e h eq ( t ) is th e i m p u l s e r e s p o n s e o f t h e e q u a l i z a t io n n e t w o r k .

C le a r ly Y our (t ) i s o f t he f o r m :

You = s b n h o u t ( t - - n T )

A ~ e gw h e r e h ~ = ~ [HP (f)HB(f)Heq(f)] ' h~2

H p ( f ) i s t h e F o u r i e r t r a n s f o r m o f t h e r e c e i v e d pu l s e s h a p e h p ( t ), H s ( f ) a n d H e q ( f ) a r e th e t r a n s f e r

f unc t io ns o f t he b i a s c i rc u i t a nd t he e qua l i z e r . T hus :

A ~ e ~

2 .2 . No i se i n t he op t i ca l r ece i ve r

I n c a l c u la t i n g t h e m e a n s q u a r e n o i s e v o l t a g e ( v ~ ) a t t h e d e c i si o n t i m e w e h a v e t o t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t s h o t -

no i se c on t r i bu t ions f r om a l l pu l se s i n t he pu l se t r a in i n so f a r a s t he y ove r l a p , a nd no t me r e ly f r om the

pu l se unde r de c i s ion . T he sh o t no i se a t the de c i s ion t ime thu s de pe nd s on t he sha pe o f t he r e c e ive d pu lse

a n d o n t h e s e q u e n c e o f O N a n d O F F p u l s es . W e c a lc u l a te t h e w o r s t c a s e o f s h o t n o i s e w h e n a l l n e i g h b o u r -

i n g p u l se s a r e O N . R a t h e r t h a n e v a l u a te t h e s h o t n o i s e a s a f u n c t i o n o f t i m e w i t h i n t h e b i t - ti m e , w e m a k e

t h e a p p r o x i m a t i o n t h a t t h e m e a n s q u a r e s h o t- n o i se v o l t a g e ( v ~ ) a t t h e d e c i s i o n t i m e i s re l a t ed t o t h e

m e a n u n i t y g a i n p h o t o c u r r e n t o v e r t h e b i t - ti m e (iO)T b y t h e n o r m a l s i m p l e s h o t n o is e e x p r e s s io n :

( v ~ ) = 2e (i o) T g2 B N R 2A 2 (1 )

w he r e g2 i s t he m e a n squa r e a va l a nc he ga in a nd BN i s t he no i se - e qu iva l e n t ba n dw id th o f t he b i a s c ir c u i t ,

a mpl i f i e r a nd e qua l i z e r :

_ 1

2B N R 2 L ~ i H e q( f ) H B ( f ) 12 d f

2 1 2

Page 3: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 3/11

A simpli f ied a pproach to digi tal opt ical receiver design

_ 1 2

. ,_ I d :

T he me a n un i ty -ga in pho to c ur re n t ove r the b i t - t ime i s, fo r a n ON pu lse :

~/e 1

~ T /2 h p ( t - - n T ) d t< i0 > ~ , o N : Y . . , , . . ~ b ~

r /e boN [ - h p ( t ) d t - n e b o N(2 )

hg2 T J = hfZ T

Fo r a n O FF pu lse , a s suming boF F i s z e ro , we ha ve :

r~e 1 ( r nUO)T, OFF =n~02 ~--~ bo N ~r- ",_T:2 h p ( t - - n T ) d t

_ r /e boN ( 1 - - 7 ) ( 3 )

h~2 T

[T /2 h p ( t ) d twh ere 3 ' = ~ - T n

i . e. , 3 ' i s the f r a c t ion o f the e ne rgy o f a s ing le pu l s e w hic h i s c on ta in e d w i th in i t s b i t - t ime . T he se va lue s o f

< i0>T c a n be su bs t i tu te d in E qua t io n 1 to c a lc u la te the w ors t - ca se me a n squa re sho t -no ise vo l ta ge s .

Pe r son ic k [4 ] c a lc u la te s the m e a n squa re sho t -no ise vo l ta ge as a func t ion o f t ime ins te a d o f a pprox i -

m a t i n g i t t o t h e s h o t n o i s e o n t h e m e a n u n i t y - g a in p h o t o c u r r e n t o v e r t h e b i t- t i m e . B y m a k i n g t h is

a pp rox i ma t ion we a c h ie ve subs ta n tia l s imp l i f i c a t ion o f the f ina l e xpre s s ions a nd c a lc u la t ions fo r the

re c e ive r s e ns i t iv i ty w i th ne g l ig ib le a dd i t iona l e r ro r .

F o r t h e t h e r m a l n o i se w e u s e t h e n o r m a l e x p r e s s i o n

< ~ > _ _ { 2 x o + S O A = f =H o u , ( f ) 2 d f + S E A 2 : ~ H e a ( f ) [ 2~ R b - = I H p 0 O

whe re 0 i s the a bso lu te t e m pe ra tu re , S I is the spe c t r a l de ns i ty o f the a mpl i f i e r no i s e c u r re n t sourc e a nd

SE i s the spe c t r a l he igh t o f the a mpl i f i e r no is e vo l ta ge sourc e . T he to ta l m e a n squa re no ise vo l ta ge a t the

de c i s ion t ime i s thus :

[ 2kO-t-Si] f : [H ~ 2 d f+ A 2 S E s (4 )< v ~> = A z e< i o > T g= + x + R b - I H p ( f ) I

We ha ve use d the a pp rox im a t ion g2 : ~ ~+x . A l te rna t ive ly , Mc In ty re ' s [6 ] m ore a c c ura te e xp re s s ion c ou ld

b e u s e d a t t h e e x p e n s e o f a l g eb r a ic c o m p l i c a t i o n i n f i n d in g t h e o p t i m u m a v a la n c h e g ai n.

We no w no rma l iz e , fo l lowing Pe r son ic k [4 ] , so tha t Oout( t = n T ) = b , , w h i c h m e a n s p u t t i n g

Arle~/hfZ = 1 a nd hou t ( t = 0 ) = 1 . I t is use fu l al so to m a ke the b a nd wid th in te g ra ls in E qu a t ion 4i n d e p e n d e n t o f b i t - ti m e T , s o t h a t t h e i r n u m e r i c al v al u e d e p e n d s o n l y o n t h e shape of the r e c e ive d a nd

e q u a l i z ed p u ls e s a n d n o t o n t h e i r scale. T o t h i s e n d w e i n t r o d u c e t h e d i m e n s i o nl e ss t im e a n d f r e q u e n c y

var iables z = t i T a nd r = f i r . We wa n t to f ind wh a t func t ion s H 'out(~b) a nd H~ ,(4) ) mu s t r e p la c e H ou t ( f

a n d H v ( J w h e n r i s s u b s t i t u t e d f o r f T a n d t h e in t e g r a t io n s p e r f o r m e d w i t h r e s p e c t t o r O n e ca n e a si ly

s h o w , b y c o n s i d er i n g t h e F o u r i e r tr a n s f o r m s o f h o u t ( z a n d h p ( r ) , t h a t

1H'out( r = ~ - H o u t ( j 0

a nd H p ( r = H p ( f )

: - I - o o , < : > = =

3 - - [ H I , ( : ) d : - T f _ d q L

213

Page 4: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 4/11

D. R. S m ith, L Garrett

Using Per son ick ' s no ta t io n [4 ] :

I H o ( 0 ) l :

1 3 = Y - ~ ~ lH ~ r d q~

z = + - - + / 2 + -a n d ~ I Rb Te 2 '3E13

i .e . Z i s a d im ens ion les s pa ra m e te r r ep resen t ing the s igna l - indepe nden t no i s e t e rm s , we ob ta in f rom

E q u a t i o n 4 :

a n dhf2 g . Z

<v~r> = <to>TTI2 9( s )

2 . 3 . C a l c u l a t i o n o f r e c e i v e r s e n s i t i v i t yW e w il l u s e t h e G a u s s ia n a p p r o x i m a t i o n t o c a l c u la t e t h e m i n i m u m e n e r g y p e r p u l se r e q u i r e d t o a c h ie v e

a p r e s c ri b e d m a x i m u m e r r o r r a t e . A l t h o u g h t h e s h o t n o i s e ha s i n f a c t a P o i ss o n d i s t r ib u t i o n , t h e

inacc uracy a r is ing f rom the Gaus s ian appro x im at ion i s no t l a rge [7 ] . W e def ine NON and NOFF as the

wors t - case va lues o f (v~r> fo r O N and O FF pu l s es , wh ich a re o b ta in ed b y subs t i tu t ing E qua t ion s 2 o r 3

f o r <io>Tn t o E q u a t i o n 5 . W e as s u m e t h a t t h e o u t p u t v o l t a g e is a G a u s s ia n r a n d o m v a r i a bl e w i t h m e a n

a n d v a r ia n c e a t t h e d e c i s i o n t i m e o f b o N a n d a ~ N = N O N f o r O N p u l se s , b O F F a n d a ~ F F = N O F F f o r

OF F pu l s es. W e a l so assum e tha t th e th re sho ld dec i s ion l eve l VD is s e t soa s to g ive equa l e r ro r p rob-

a b i l i ty P E f o r O N a n d O F F p u ls e s. T h e n

( b O N - - V D ) / a O N - - ( V D - - b o F F ) / a O F F =

a n d

1 89R E -

T h e n i f bO F F is z e r o , t h e r e q u i r e d e n e r g y p e r p u l se t o a c h ie v e th e m a x i m u m e r r o r r a t e c h a r a c t e r i z e d

by Q i s:

boN = g t V ] ( [ , ~ b o N I 2 + Z a / 2 + + x ~_ ~ o N ( l _ 7 ) i 2 + 1/2 ,

W ith a non-ava lanche p ho tod iod e , ~ = 1 and the sho t -no i s e t e rm s a re usua l ly negl ig ib le in com p ar i son

w i t h t h e t h e r m a l n o i s e . T h u s

bO N = 2 Q n a Z v Z , i f = 1rl

wh ic h is , o f cour se , iden t ica l to Per son ick ' s [4 ] r esu l t fo r a non-ava lanche pho tod iod e .

(6 )

2 . 4 . O p t i m u m a v a l a n ch e g ai n

Equating OboN/O t o z e r o , w e o b t a i n :

gov t u~ r~ 212 K

w h e r e

K = - - 1 + 1 + ~ - ~ - ]

F r o m E q u a t i o n s 6 a n d 7 w e o b t a i n o u r m a i n r e s u lt f o r t h e m i n i m u m r e q u i r e d p u ls e e n e r g y :

( 7 )

2 1 4

Page 5: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 5/11

A s i m p l i f i e d a p p r o a c h t o d i g i ta l o p t i c a l r e c e i v e r d e s i g n

b O N , m i n = Q(2+x) tQ+x)(~)ZX/(2+2x)I~/O+X)L ( 8 )

w h e r e

Ll+X= [ 2 ( 1 - - 7 ) ] ( [ K + I ] 1/2 1 1/2}

T h o u g h i t is a c u m b e r s o m e e x p r e s s i o n , L is a p a r a m e t e r w h i c h d e p e n d s o n l y o n t h e f r a c t io n 7 o f th e

p u l s e e n e r g y c o n t a i n e d w i t h i n t h e b i t - ti m e a n d o n t h e x - f a c t o r f o r t h e p h o t o d i o d e . F i g . 2 is a p l o t o f L

v e r su s 7 f o r t h r e e t y p i c a l v a l u e s o f x , a n d m a y b e u s e d t o f i n d L f o r a n y r e c e i v e d p u l s e s h a p e .

T h e r e q u i r e d e n e r g y p e r p u l s e a t o p t i m u m g ain i s g i ve n b y E q u a t i o n 8 , a n d c a n b e c a l c u l a t e d f o r a n y

r e c e iv e d a n d e q u a l i z e d p u l s e s h ap e s . T h e d e p e n d e n c e o n b i t - ra t e i s e n t i r e ly c o n t a i n e d i n Z , w h i c h i s

d o m i n a t e d b y t h e t e r m ( 2z rC ) 2 S E I 3 / T e 2 e x c e p t a t v e r y l o w b i t -r a t e s, a n d w h i c h e n t e r s t o t h e p o w e r

0 . 1 2 - 0 . 1 7 ( f o r x o f 0 . 3 - 0 . 5 ) . T h e r e q u i r e d p u l s e e n e r g y is t h e r e f o r e v e r y in s e n si ti v e t o b i t - ra t e , d e c r e a s -

i n g b y a f a c t o r o f 2 - 3 b e t w e e n 1 a n d 5 0 0 M b s - 1 , (a s s u m i n g S v. is c o n s t a n t w i t h b i t - r a te ) .

3 . Resul ts

3.1 . Depe ndence o f r eq u i red pu lse energy on pu l se w id thT h e o p t i m u m rece i v ed p u l s e s h ap e i s an im p u l s e [4 ] , s i n ce t h en [H ~(~)12 = 1 fo r a ll 4) an d t h e b an d -

w i d t h i n t eg ra l s I2 an d 1 3 a r e a s s m a l l a s t h e y can b e m ad e b y v a ry i n g H ~(q ~).

W e c a n c a l c u la t e t h e p o w e r p e n a l t y w h i c h h a s t o b e p a i d f o r h a v in g r e c e i v e d p u l s es w h i c h a r e n o t

i m p u l s e s. T h e p e n a l t y i n d B i s g iv e n b y :

I IX/(2+2x)I1/(l+x) L3 2 [

A b o N = 1 0 1 o g lo } l ~ [I : 3 , o p t 2 , o p t o p t )

4 .0

3 .5

3 .2

2 8

2 / .

2 0 1

0.1

~c=1

sc=0. :

I I I I I I I I0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9

> 7

Figure 2 A g r a p h o f t h e p a r a m e t e r L a s a

f u n c t i o n o f % t h e f r a c t i o n o f r e c ei v ed

o p t i c a l p u l s e e n e r g y w i t h i n i ts b i t * t i m e , f o r

v a lu e s o f t h e p h o t o d i o d e x - p a r a m e t e r o f0 .3 , 0 .5 a n d 1 .0 .

215

Page 6: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 6/11

D. R . Smi t h , L Garre t t

18

16

14

m 1 2" o

S 10gQ. .

8

5

4

/ / /

// /

o11 o:2 o13 o[41 - y

Figure 3 T h e p e n a l t y in m i n i m u m

rece ived po we r f o r pu l se sp read i ng

ou t s i de t he b i t - t i m e , assum ing

Gauss ian rece ived pu lses. Th e do t tedl i ne i s rep rod uced f rom Person ick [ 4 ] .

f r o m E q u a t i o n 8 , i n w h i c h w e h a v e ig n o r e d t h e I 2 t e r m a g ai n i n Z i n c o m p a r i s o n w i t h t h e c a p a c i ta t i v e

t e r m . Th e p en a l ty th en d ep en d s o n th e sh ap e o f t h e r ece iv ed p u l se b u t n o t o n th e b i t - r a t e . F ig . 3 sh o ws

th e p en a l ty a s a f u n c t io n o f 7 f o r Gau ss i an r ece iv ed p u lse s , tak in g an x - f ac to r o f 0 .5 f o r t h e p h o to d io d e .

Th e r e su l ts o f Pe r so n ick [ 4 ] h av e b een r ep r o d u ce d f o r co m p ar i so n , an d th e ag r eem en t i s ex ce l l en t . On e

can see f r o m F ig . 3 t h a t t h e r e i s a sev e r e p en a l ty i f t h e p u l se en e r g y sp r ead s s ig n i f i can tly b ey o n d i t s

b i t - t im e .

3 .2 . L a u n c h e d p o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s

Fr o m F ig . 3 , we d ed u ce th a t i n an o p t i ca l f i b r e sy s t em o n e wan t s t o u se a s n a r r o w a l au n ch ed p u l se a s

p o s s ib l e in o r d e r t o m i n i m i z e t h e p e n a l t y i n f l ic t e d b y d i s p er s io n a n d i n t e r s y m b o l i n t e r f e r e n c e o f t h e

r ece iv ed p u l se s , an d co n seq u en t ly r ed u ce th e n o i se eq u iv a len t b an d wid th o f t h e r ece iv e r. B y co n t r a s t , i n

a co ax ia l cab le sy s t em , th e r e i s an o p t im u m p u l se w id th ; a p en a l ty acc r u es i f t o o n a r r o w p u l se s ar e

l a u n c h e d b e c a u s e o f e x ce s s iv e a t t e n u a t i o n o f t h e h i g h - f re q u e n c y e n d o f t h e s p e c t r u m .

Ho w ev er , i n an o p t i ca l f i b r e sy s t em , th e p r ac t i ca l n a r r o win g o f t h e l au n c h ed o p t i ca l p u l se m ay b e

l i m i t e d b y t h e p e a k o u t p u t p o w e r w h i c h t h e o p t i c a l s o u r c e c a n e m i t w i t h o u t a n u n a c c e p t a b l e d e gr a-

d a t io n r a t e , f o r ex am p le , t h r o u g h f ace t d am ag e in a sem ico n d u c to r l a se r [ 8 ] . W e d o n o t h av e en o u g h

i n f o r m a t i o n a t r e l e v an t p u ls e r e p e t i t i o n r a t e s o n t h e e f f e c t o f p e a k p o w e r o n l a s e r d e g ra d a t io n , s o w e

a s s um e t h a t t h e d e g r a d a t i o n r a t e r D i s p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e e m i t t e d o p t i c a l p o w e r P t o s o m e p o w e r z . F o r

r ec t an g u la r l au n ch ed p u l se s , t h e d eg r ad a t io n r a t e d u r in g th e p u l se isr D ~ ( P , ~ ) ~

wh er e PL i s t h e p ea k em i t t ed p o wer . W e wil l i g n o r e th e lo ss in co u p l in g th e l a se r t o t h e f ib r e , a s t h i s d o es

n o t a f f e c t th e a r g u m e n t , a n d t a k e P L a s t h e p e a k l a u n c h e d p o w e r a l so . W e c an n o w c a l cu l a te t h e

n ecessa r y en e r g y p e r p u lse b o N r eq u i r ed to ach iev e a p r e sc r ib ed m ax i m u m e r r o r r a t e as a f u n c t io n o f

l au n ch ed p u l se w id th , w i th th e co n s t r a in t t h a t t h e to t a l so u r ce d eg r ad a t io n p e r u n i t t im e ( say p e r b i t -

t im e) i s h e ld co n s t an t a t it s m ax im u m a ccep tab le v a lu e R D . W e h av e :

1 [ T/2RD = -T" J-T~2 rD (t) dt"

Fo r r ec t an g u la r l au n ch ed p u l se s o f d u r a t io n - - a L T / 2 < t < a L T / 2 , a n d a s s u m i ng z e r o o u t p u t p o w e r

i n th e O F F s t a t e :R D c c p ~o ~L

2 1 6

Page 7: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 7/11

A simplified approach to digital optical receiver design

1c

c~

&

=0.L

0.3

0.2

a n d

H e n c e

~ 0 : F = 0.1i i . i

0:;= 0

0[2 ' O i L ' 0 [ 6 ' 0 ' . 8 ' 1'0

(Z L

F igu re 4 The pen a l t y i n rece ived p ow er as a

f u n c t i o n o f l a u n c h e d p u ls e w i d t h ~ L a n d

f i b re bandw i d t h , assum i ng rec t angu l a r

l aunched pu lses and a Gauss ian f i b re

t r a n s f e r f u n c t i o n , a n d n o r m a l iz e d t o f u l l -

w i d t h l a u n c h e d p uls e s a n d i n f i n i t e f i b r e

b a n d w i d t h .

b o N = PLa L T .R~/z ec bON (aLT)O/z) -1.

H e n c e , h o l d i n g R D c o n s t a n t , w e c a l c u l a t e t h e p e n a l t y i n re c e i v er s e n s i ti v i t y b o N a s a f u n c t i o n o f

l a u n c h e d p u l s e w i d t h a L ; b o N ~ a L - 1 /z .

W e h a v e p e r f o r m e d t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s a s s u m i n g a G a u s s i a n t r a n s f e r f u n c t i o n f o r t h e f i b re , a r e a s o n a b l e

a s s u m p t i o n g i v e n s u b s t a n t i a l m o d e - m i x i n g . T h u s t h e f i b r e t r a n s f e r f u n c t i o n i s :

a n d t h e l a u n c h e d p u l s e s h a p e i s :

T h e r e c e iv e d p u l s e s h a p e i s t h e n :

H ~ ( r = e - ( 2 ~ F r

h E ( t ) = 1/aLT l t l<O~LT/2

= 0 e l s e w h e r e .

o ( 0 - ' [ e , ' o2 (X L T t - - - - ~ J - - e r , c [ ~ T ~ - - - 2 - / / J "

W e h a v e a ls o c a l c u l a t e d t h e p o w e r p e n a l t y a s a f u n c t i o n o f p u l s e w i d t h f o r t h e c a s e o f a r ig i d u p p e r

l i m i t t o t h e p e a k p o w e r a v a il a b le f r o m t h e l a s e r, i n d e p e n d e n t o f p u ls e d u r a t i o n a n d r e p e t i t i o n r a t e, w h i c h

i s t h e m o s t p e s s i m i s t ic c a s e . T h e r e s u l ts f o r s e v e ra l f ib r e b a n d w i d t h s ( ~ v ) a r e s h o w n i n F i g . 4 , n o r m a l -

i z e d t o t h e c as e o f fu l l - w i d t h la u n c h e d p u l s es a n d i n f in i t e f i b r e b a n d w i d t h ( ~ L = 1 , a F = 0 ) . T h e r e is a

b r o a d m i n i m u m , c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e o p t i m u m t r a d e - o f f b e t w e e n r e d u c in g th e p u l s e o v e r la p a n d r ed u c -

i n g t h e p u l s e e n e r g y b y n a r r o w i n g t h e p u l s e. T h e b e n e f i t o f u s i n g r e d u c e d - w i d t h p u l s e s is a f e w d e c i b e lsi f t h e f i b r e b a n d w i d t h i s a s i g n i f ic a n t l i m i t a t i o n .

2 1 7

Page 8: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 8/11

D . R . S m i t h , L G a r r e t t

5r

1:3

. /.

-6

# _

z = l

' o ' 2 ' o ! ~ ' o 1 6 ' o ! 8 ' ( o~L

F i g u r e 5 T h e p e n a l t y in m i n i m u m l a u nc h e d

p o w e r a s a f u n c t i o n o f l a u n c h e d p u l s e w i d t h

f o r v a r i o u s va l u e s o f t h e s o u r c e d e g r a d a t i o n

p a r a m e t e r z , a s s u m i n g r e c t a n g u l a r l a u n c h e d

p u ls e s a n d i n f i n i t e f i b r e b a n d w i d t h , a n d

n o r m a l i z e d t o f u l l - w i d t h l a u n c h e d p uls es .

W e h a v e p e r f o r m e d t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r s e v e ra l v a l u e s o f z w i t h a fi x e d f i b r e t r a n s f e r f u n c t i o n a r .

F i g . 5 s h o w s th e r e s u l t s f o r i n f i n i te b a n d w i d t h f i b re , a r = O . T h e c a s e o f z = 1 c o r r e s p o n d s t o c o n s t a n t

e n e r g y i n th e p u l se . F o r l a rg e r va l ue s o f z , t h e r e i s a m i n i m u m i n t h e p o w e r p e n a l t y . T h e c u r ve m a r k e d

A is f o r a s o u r c e w i t h a fi x e d u p p e r l i m i t t o t h e e m i t t e d o p t i c a l p o w e r a s i n F i g . 4 .

4 . D i s c u s s i o n

4 . 1 . C o m p a r i s o n w i t h P e r s o n i c k 's t h e o r yP e r s o n i c k g iv e s a n e x p r e s s i o n f o r th e m e a n s q u a r e s h o t - n o i s e v o lt a g e ( E q u a t i o n 1 7 o f [ 4 ] p . 8 5 2 ) :

( n~ (t ) ) = = e 2 ~ 2 ~ b . h p ( t - - n T ~ - ~ + X o h ~ ( t - - t ' ) d t

w h e r e X o is t h e ' d a r k c u r r e n t ' c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e p r i m a r y p h o t o c u r r e n t , a n d , w i t h r = 27r ,

1 Hout (Oa)~ : [ h i ( t - - t ') ] = g i ( L o ) = H e q (( .o ) ( I / R ) + j o a C H p ( c O )

I n t h e c a s e w h e r e a ll b n = b o N ( w o r s t - c a s e s h o t - n o i se f o r a n O N p u l s e ) , a n d i g n o r i n g X o , t h i s e x p r e s s i o n

b e c o m e s

( n ~ ( t = O ) ) = N O N = e 2 g - ~ b o N - - n T ) h ~ ( t - - t ') d t ' .

T h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g e x p r e s s io n i n t hi s t h e o r y is

N O N = e 2 ~2 fiY~ T

T h e a g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n t h e t w o t h e o r i e s t h u s d e p e n d s o n t h e s h a p e o f t h e r e c e iv e d p u ls e . D i sr e g ar d in g

t h e c o n s t a n t m u l t i p li e r , w h i c h i s th e s a m e i n b o t h e q u a t i o n s , t h e e x p r e s s io n d e r iv e d b y P e r s o n i c k c a nb e w r i t t e n :

2 1 8

Page 9: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 9/11

A s impl i f ied approa ch to d ig i ta l op t ica l receiver des ign

f ~ [ ~ n h p ( t ' - - n T ) ] h ~ ( t - - t ' ) d t '.

T h e q u a n t i t y i n t h e s q u a r e b r a c k e t s is a p e r i o d i c w a v e f o r m a n d s o c a n b e e x p r e s s e d a s a F o u r i e r s e r ie s :

, F ( t ) = ~ . h p ( t - - n T ) = • c m e - 2 = m j t / T

71 111w h e r e

1 ( T / 2 ~C m = -T J - T n n h e ( s - - n T ) e 2 r rm j s/ r d s

l f ~ h p ( s ) e 2 ~ m m /Tds- -

T _

1 H { 27 rm l = 1 H ; ( m ) .

I n pa r t i c u l a r , Co = 1 /T .

T hus P e r son i c k ' s e xpr e s s ion f o r t he w or s t - c a se sho t - no i se du r ing a n O N pu l se i s :

NON = ea g2 h~r/bONT ~ H ;(m ) 2 e -2 ~ rm i t/ T h ~ ( t - - t ' ) d t '

= eZ g 2 17 b oN Z1

hgZ T

T h u s t h e t h e o r y u s e d h e r e g iv es t h e s a m e r e s u lt a s P e r s o n i c k ' s w h e n 2 1 = / 2 . A s / 2 is t h e f i r st t e r m i n

2 ;1 , w e e x p e c t g o o d a g r e e m e n t w h e n H p ( m ) i s sma l l f o r [ m[ ~> 1 w hic h impl i e s b r o a d r e c e ive d pu l se s . I n

f a c t , i f H ~( m ) = 0 f o r im j ~> 1 t he r e c e ive d pu l se sha pe m us t s a t i s f y t he N y qu i s t c r i t e r i on , i .e . pos se s s

ske w sym m e t r y a bo u t t = T . U n le s s suc h a pu l se is r e c t a ngu l a r , c ons ide r a b l e e ne r gy is sp r e a d ou t s i de t he

b i t - t i m e .T h e c a s e o f a n O F F p u l s e i s p e r h a p s b e s t i n v e s t i g a te d b y d i r e c t c o m p a r i s o n o f t h e r e s u lt s o f t h e t w o

the or i e s .

I n F ig . 6 w e s h o w t h e e r r o r in b o N r e s u lt in g f r o m t h e a p p r o x i m a t i o n u s e d in t h is p a p e r c o m p a r e d

w i th P e r son i c k ' s mor e de t a i l e d a na lys i s , f o r G a uss i a n a nd r e c t a ngu l a r r e c e ive d pu l se s a nd a r a i s e d - c os ine

o u t p u t p u ls e . T h e m a x i m u m e r r o r o f 0 . 6 2 d B (t h e t h e o r y u s e d h e r e u n d e r es t im a t e s b o N ) o c c u rs w h e n

t h e r e c e i v e d p u ls e is a n im p u l s e . F o r w i d e r p u l se s t h e a g r e e m e n t is e x c e ll e n t. I n f a c t t h e m a x i m u m e r r o r

i n v o l v e d i s s m a l l e r t h a n t h e e r r o r w h i c h c o u l d r e s u lt f r o m u s in g t h e s i m p l e f ' ~ e x p r e s s i o n f o r t h e e x c e s s

0-7

0 . 6 .

m 0 5

g 0,4Z3

c_

0 3

Ld

02

0I

i

0 0 ' 1 0 ' 2 0 ' 3 0 ' ~ 0 ' .~ 0 ' .6 0 ' 7 0 ' 8 0 ' -9 1 0o~

Figure 6 T h e d i s c r e p a n c y b e t w e e n Q u r

t h e o r y a n d t h a t d e r i v e d b y P e r s o n i c k [ 4 ]

a s a f u n c t i o n o f r e c e iv e d p u l s e w i d t hfo r r ec tang u la r and G auss ian pu lses.

2 1 9

Page 10: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 10/11

D. R. Smith, L Garrett

m u l t i p l i c a t io n n o i s e in s t e ad o f M c I n t y r e ' s [ 6 ] m o r e a c c u r a t e f o r m . W e e x p e c t o u r s i m p l e r t h e o r y t o

p r o v i d e r e a s o n a b le e s t i m a t e s o f t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f r e a l s y s t e m s , a n d t o p r o v i d e a s o u n d b a s is f o r

c o m p a r i s o n o f s y s te m s .

4 . 2 . O p t i m u m l a u n c h e d p u l s e w i d t h

T he ca lcu la t ions desc r ibed in Se c t ion 3 . 2 and r ep rese n ted in F igs. 4 and 5 ind ica te tha t the r ece iver i sm o re s ens i t ive to r e duce d-w id th l aunch ed pu l s es , pa r t i cu la r ly i f the re i s s ign i f ican t pu l s e d i sper s ion in

t h e f i br e . T h e o p t i m u m p u l se w i d t h d e p e n d s o n t h e t r a n s f e r f u n c t i o n o f t h e f i b r e , t h e d e p e n d e n c e o f

o p t i c a l s o u r c e d e g r a d a t io n o n p u l s e d u r a t i o n a n d r e p e t i t i o n r a t e , a n d o t h e r f a c t o r s , b u t t h e r e i s a l w a y s

som e adva n tage in using r educed-w id th pu l ses .

A l t h o u g h t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s i n r e c e i v e r s e n s it i v it y t h a t c a n b e o b t a i n e d a r e n o t l a r ge ( a f e w d e c i b e l s

o n l y , e v e n w i t h s e v e re b a n d w i d t h l i m i t a t i o n i n t h e f i b r e ) a n i m p o r t a n t p o i n t i s t h a t t h e r e i s n o d is -

a d v a n ta g e i n u s in g r e d u c e d - w i d t h p u ls e s, d o w n t o a w i d t h d e p e n d i n g o n a r a n d z . T h u s r e t u r n - t o - z e ro -

l e ve l c o d in g m a y b e u s e d w i t h n o i n c re a s e ( in f a c t p o s s ib l y a d e c r e a s e) i n t h e f i b re b a n d w i d t h r e q u i r e d .

A m o r e i m p o r t a n t b e n e f i t b e c o m e s c l e a r w h e n o n e c o n s id e r s th e p o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s o f a s e m i c o n d u c t o r

l a se r , u n d e r c i r c u m s t a n c e s w h e n i t m a y b e b i a s e d a t z e r o d r iv e c u r r e n t . B e c a u s e o f t h e n o n - l i n e a r

c h a r a c t e r is t i c o f o p t i c a l o u t p u t p o w e r a s a f u n c t i o n o f d r i ve c u r r e n t , t h e e l e c tr i c a l e n e r g y r e q u i r e d t op rod uce an op t ica l pu l s e o f g iven energy depends o n the pu l s e w id th , and i s l eas t fo r na r ro w pu ls es . So

t h e e l e c tr i c a l p o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e l a se r ( a n d h e n c e o f i ts c o n t r o l c i r c u i t, e t c . ) m a y b e r e d u c e d b y

us ing r educ ed-w id th pu l s es , w i th no d i s advan tage in r ece iver s ens i t iv i ty and f ib re bandw id th .

T h e o p t i m u m p u l se w i d t h d e p e n d s , t h e n , o n a b a la n c e o f s o u r c e l i f e ti m e a n d p o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s ,

a n d o n f i b r e b a n d w i d t h . A p u l s e w i d t h o f a b o u t h a l f t h e b i t- t i m e w o u l d n o t b e f a r o f f th e o p t i m u m i n

m any cases .

One a r r ives a t a conc lus ion fo r the op t im um pu ls e w id th r a th er s im i la r fo r op t ica l f ib re sys tem s and

co-ax ia l cab le sys tem s , bu t fo r ve ry d i f f e ren t r easons . In the coax ia l cab le sys tem , the cab le ban dw id th

i s l i m i t e d b y f r e q u e n c y - d e p e n d e n t a t t e n u a t i o n , a p p r o x i m a t e l y a s X /f . A r e d u c e d - w i d t h p u l se e n a b l e s o n e

t o r e d u c e t h e h i g h - f r e q u e n c y l if t ( a n d h e n c e t h e n o i s e e q u i v a l e n t b a n d w i d t h ) o f t h e r e c e iv e r a m p l i f ie r .

T o o m u c h r e d u c t i o n o f p u l se w i d t h r e s u lt s in e x c e s si v e a t t e n u a t i o n i n t r a n sm i s s io n . I n a n o p t i c a l f i b re ,

t h e a t t e n u a t i o n i s i n d e p e n d e n t o f f r e q u e n c y ( o v e r a ra n g e o f th e o r d e r o f T H z ) ; t h e b a n d w i d t h i s l i m i t e d

b y d i s p e rs i o n w h i c h b r o a d e n s t h e p u l s e in t h e t i m e d o m a i n . A r e d u c e d - w i d t h p u l s e c o n f i n e s m o r e o f t h e

p u l s e e n e r g y w i t h i n i ts o w n b i t -t i m e a n d t h u s r e d u c e s i n t e r s y m b o l i n t e r f e r e n c e i n t h e r e c e iv e d p ul se s .

T h e n o i s e -e q u i v a l e n t b a n d w i d t h o f t h e r e c e iv e r c a n t h e r e f o r e b e r e d u c e d , i n c r e as i n g t h e r e c e i v er

sens i t iv i ty .

5 . Co n c l u s i o n s

W e h a v e d e s c r i b e d a s i m p li f ie d t h e o r y o f n o i s e i n a n o p t i c a l r e c e iv e r a n d h e n c e d e r i v e d t h e r e c e iv e r

s ens i t iv i ty . W e have shown tha t th i s theo ry g ives r esu l ts ve ry s im i la r to the r esu l t s o f a m o re de ta i l ed

t h e o r y b y P e r s o n i c k [ 4 ] f o r t h e t y p e s o f r e ce i v e d a n d e q u a l i z e d p u ls e s h ap e s o f p r a c t ic a l i n t e re s t . W eh a v e u s e d o u r s i m p l i fi e d t h e o r y t o c a l c u la t e t h e o p t i m u m l a u n c h e d p u l se w i d t h i n a s y s te m w i t h v a r i o u s

degrees o f f ib re d i sper s ion , and a l so fo r va r ious power - law depe nden ces o f l a s e r deg rad a t ion r a te on

op t ica l o u tp u t pow er . W e have show n tha t the re i s a sm al l inc rease in r ece iver s ens i t iv i ty to be ga ined by

us ing r educe d-w id th pu l s es in a ll cases . T hu s on e m ay use r e tu rn - to -ze ro - leve l cod ing , and pos s ib ly

r e d u c e t h e m e a n p o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e l a s er s i g n if i ca n t l y , w i t h n o p e n a l t y i n r e c e i v er s e n s it i v it y o r

s y s t e m b a n d w i d t h . T h e m e t h o d s u s e d i n t h is p a p e r m a y b e a p p l i e d t o t h e d e s i g n o f d i g it a l o p t i c a l

r ece iver s fo r a ny g iven r ece ived and equa l ized pu l s e shapes .

AcknowledgementsW e are g ra te fu l to Dr J . E . Midwin te r an d o th er co l l eagues fo r m an y s t im ula t ing d i s cuss ions, and to the

D i r e c t o r o f R e s e a r c h o f t h e P o s t O f f i c e f o r p e rm i s s i o n t o p u b l i s h t h is w o r k .

220

Page 11: A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

8/8/2019 A Simplified Approach for Digital Optical Receiver Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-simplified-approach-for-digital-optical-receiver-design 11/11

A simplified approach to digital optical receiver design

References

1 . w . M . H U B B A R D , B e l l S y s t . Te c h. J . 52 (1973) 731-65.

2. R. DOGLIOTTI, A. GUARDIN CERRI and A. LUVISON, Op t . Qu a n t . E le c t . 8 (1976) 343-53.

3. J. E. MIDWINTER, i b i d 9 (1977) 299-304.

4 . S . D . P E R S O N I C K , B e l l S y s t . T e c h . J. 52 (1973) 843-86.

5. A.B . CARLSON, 'Com muni cati on Systems' , 2nd Edition , (McGraw-HiU, Kogakusha, 1975).

6. R. J. MCINTYRE, I EE E T r an s. E le c t r o n . De v ic e s ED-13 (1966) 164-8.7 . P . B A L A B A N , B e l l S y s t . T e ch . J. 55 (1976) 745-66.

8. N. CHINONE, R. ITO and O. NAKADA, J. A p p L P h y s. 47 (1976) 785-6.

221