A Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary Method for Flow, FSI ... · A Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary...
Transcript of A Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary Method for Flow, FSI ... · A Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary...
A Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary Method A Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary Method for Flow, FSI & for Flow, FSI & AeroacousticsAeroacoustics II: II: Application to Biological FlowsApplication to Biological Flows
RajatRajat MittalMittalMechanical Engineering
OutlineOutline
Insect FlightInsect Flight
Dolphin kick in Olympic swimmersDolphin kick in Olympic swimmers
FSI of Phonation: Towards a CFD based FSI of Phonation: Towards a CFD based surgery planning toolsurgery planning tool
Cardiovascular Cardiovascular HemodynamicsHemodynamics
• Turning in a Monarch Butterfly• Sequence shows 1.5 flaps• >90o change in heading !• Turning distance < body size• Turn on a dime!
+
+
+
+
+
++
How does the Butterfly do this ? How does the Butterfly do this ? Deformable WingsDeformable Wings
Wings deform significantlyWings deform significantly
Greater repertoire of wing Greater repertoire of wing kinematics.kinematics.
–– Large leftLarge left--right wing right wing asymmetriesasymmetries
What causes deformationWhat causes deformation
–– Flow and inertia induced Flow and inertia induced deformation. (deformation. (Daniels et alDaniels et al))
–– Also active deformation through Also active deformation through action of direct muscles on action of direct muscles on axillaryaxillary scleritessclerites (wing joint).(wing joint).
Perhaps even active control of Perhaps even active control of deformability ??deformability ??
Flight Stabilization ??Flight Stabilization ??
Consider a Flapping Wing MAV in an Urban Consider a Flapping Wing MAV in an Urban Environment:Environment:–– Shear layers, wakes, corner flows Shear layers, wakes, corner flows ……
–– Understand flight stabilization in insectsUnderstand flight stabilization in insects
What can we learn from insects?What can we learn from insects?
Integrated ApproachIntegrated ApproachHigh Speed High Speed VideogrammetryVideogrammetry–– Tyson Hedrick LabTyson Hedrick Lab (UNC Chapel(UNC Chapel--Hill)Hill)
Structural parameterization Structural parameterization ((VallanceVallance Lab, GWU)Lab, GWU)–– WingWing–– BodyBody
High Fidelity Computational Modeling of High Fidelity Computational Modeling of Aerodynamics and AeroAerodynamics and Aero--Structural InteractionStructural Interaction–– Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary MethodSharp Interface Immersed Boundary Method–– Direct and LargeDirect and Large--Eddy Simulation Eddy Simulation –– Wing deformation modeling using FEM Wing deformation modeling using FEM
HighHigh--Speed HighSpeed High--Resolution Resolution VideogrammetryVideogrammetry
X Y
Z
X Y
Z
X Y
Z
X Y
Z
X
Z
YX
Z
Y X Y
Z
X Y
Z
110
5075
100
20 4060
80100
120
1
2
4 3
0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16-40
-20
0
20
A
ccel
erat
ion
(m/s
2 )
Time (s)
X-direction Y-direction Z-direction
Trajectory
Body Acceleration Painted Lady
COBRE Insect VideogrammetryLab
Rendering for CFD
Closing the Loop for Closing the Loop for CFD in Biology/Biomedical EngineeringCFD in Biology/Biomedical Engineering
Imaging Imaging (MRI, CT, Laser Scan)(MRI, CT, Laser Scan)
Geometric ModelsGeometric Models
AnimationAnimationOf Geometric ModelsOf Geometric Models
CFD/FSI SolverCFD/FSI SolverFor Complex, Moving For Complex, Moving
Organic ShapesOrganic Shapes
MimicsMimics Alias MAYAAlias MAYA
VICAR3DVICAR3D
HawkmothHawkmoth in Hoverin Hover
Hedrick Lab (UNC)Hedrick Lab (UNC)
Animated Model Rendered for CFDAnimated Model Rendered for CFD
Moth body based Moth body based on highon high--res laser res laser scan.scan.
Animation created Animation created in MAYA by in MAYA by matching high matching high speed video.speed video.
Vortex DynamicsVortex Dynamics
Strong spiral LEV on Strong spiral LEV on downstrokedownstroke..
Vortex ring shed at the Vortex ring shed at the end of end of downstrokedownstroke from from each wing.each wing.
Weak LEV on upstrokeWeak LEV on upstroke
Lift PredictionLift PredictionWt. of insect ~ 13.6 Wt. of insect ~ 13.6 mNmN
Average lift from CFD =15.0 Average lift from CFD =15.0 mNmN. Not bad!. Not bad!
How well does the timeHow well does the time--variation of lift compare to experiment?variation of lift compare to experiment?
Experimental determination?Experimental determination?–– Track acceleration of CM of wing, body partsTrack acceleration of CM of wing, body parts
–– Use simple dynamical model of insect to back out lift on wing.Use simple dynamical model of insect to back out lift on wing.
Fairly good prediction of peak thrust during Fairly good prediction of peak thrust during downstrokedownstroke..
Some mismatch during upstrokeSome mismatch during upstroke–– Larger cycleLarger cycle--toto--cycle variations in upstrokecycle variations in upstroke
Interestingly, upstroke is found to be quite ineffective!Interestingly, upstroke is found to be quite ineffective!
down up
Comparison with Past Models Comparison with Past Models Liu et al (Chiba University)Liu et al (Chiba University)HawkmothHawkmoth in hoverin hoverRigid wingsRigid wingsKinematics based Kinematics based on Ellingtonon Ellington’’s data.s data.Average lift is comparableAverage lift is comparable
However simulations show However simulations show significant lift generation significant lift generation during up (back) stroke.during up (back) stroke.
Possibilities?Possibilities?–– Discrepancy in kinematicsDiscrepancy in kinematics–– Rigid versus deformable?Rigid versus deformable?
Current
Liu et al.
Insect Flight Stability in Unsteady Insect Flight Stability in Unsteady EnvironmentsEnvironments
Conventional View:Conventional View: Stabilization achieved by changes inStabilization achieved by changes in
Many large insects seem to Many large insects seem to also changealso change
––
––
Role of ?Role of ?
{ } { } { } { } { }{ }
body wing wing wing body bodycp cp
body wing
I I r F r F
I I
ω
ω
⎡ ⎤+ = × + ×⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤− +⎣ ⎦
{ }wingF
bodyI⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
wingI⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
+X
+Z+Zb
+Xb
abdominalflexion
pitch
proboscis
A. B.
C. D.
{ }bodyF
How to study gust response in How to study gust response in insects?insects?
Controlled experiments with freely flying Controlled experiments with freely flying insects are challenging!insects are challenging!
Need experimental assays that areNeed experimental assays that are–– For For untethereduntethered free flightfree flight
–– Predictable (to enable highPredictable (to enable high--speedspeed--rezrez videographyvideography))
–– RepeatableRepeatable
–– Provide a variety of (and calibrated) gust perturbations.Provide a variety of (and calibrated) gust perturbations.
ApproachApproachWork with Work with HawkmothsHawkmoths ((ManducaManduca SextaSexta) ) –– Large insect (~4Large insect (~4”” span)span)
–– Easy to culture/maintain.Easy to culture/maintain.
–– Excellent hoverer.Excellent hoverer.
–– Can be conditioned to approach and hover in front of nectar Can be conditioned to approach and hover in front of nectar source.source.
Hovering flight perturbed by incident vortex ringsHovering flight perturbed by incident vortex rings
–– Can control magnitude of impulse, energy and Can control magnitude of impulse, energy and vorticityvorticity of of the incident vortex ring.the incident vortex ring.
Small/large/massive perturbation.Small/large/massive perturbation.
–– Control size of ring and location/orientation of impactControl size of ring and location/orientation of impact
Pitch, roll, yawPitch, roll, yaw moments can be generated.moments can be generated.
Vortex Ring Impingement: Vortex Ring Impingement: Low Impulse ImpactLow Impulse Impact
High Impulse ImpactHigh Impulse Impact
Also track• Head-thorax- abdomen• Multiple points on wing• Body/Wing CoM
Vortex Ring Impingement: CFDVortex Ring Impingement: CFD
• Introduced in 1980, no regulation
• David Berkoff and Daichi Suzuki swim half the race using the dolphin kick, prompting FINA regulation
• Subsequently allowed for 15 meters after the start and every turn
• Undulatory wave travels down the length of the body, smallest amplitude at the fingertips, largest amplitude at the toes
Hydrodynamics of the Dolphin KickHydrodynamics of the Dolphin Kick
L
AU
f: frequency
UCslip
LA
UAfStLU :;;;Re ==
νRe: Reynolds numberRe: Reynolds numberSt : St : StrouhalStrouhal NumberNumber
The Dolphin Kick: The Dolphin Kick: Key ParametersKey Parameters
Issues that we hoped to address:Issues that we hoped to address:
What is the mechanism of thrust production in the What is the mechanism of thrust production in the human dolphin kick?human dolphin kick?–– No specific adaptation for swimmingNo specific adaptation for swimming–– Significant anatomical asymmetry Significant anatomical asymmetry stroke asymmetrystroke asymmetry–– What part of the body contribute thrust/drag etcWhat part of the body contribute thrust/drag etc–– ““active dragactive drag”” versus passive dragversus passive drag
How does thrust and power consumption scale with How does thrust and power consumption scale with StStand and A/LA/L–– Optimality?Optimality?–– Wake vortex topology?Wake vortex topology?
Are certain Are certain ““gaitsgaits”” more effective than others?more effective than others?
Optimal Optimal StrouhalStrouhal Number in Mammals that Number in Mammals that Swim Using Dolphin KickSwim Using Dolphin Kick
Courtesy: Dr. Frank FishCourtesy: Dr. Frank FishWestchester UniversityWestchester University
Olympic Swimmers Versus Dolphins?Olympic Swimmers Versus Dolphins?
Strouhal Number vs. Velocity
0.10
0.30
0.50
0.70
0.90
1.10
1.30
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
Length Specicfic Velocity (U/L)
Stro
uhal N
umbe
rMaleFemaleCetaceanLinear (Male)Linear (Female)Linear (Cetacean)
{{Range for Range for most efficient most efficient swimmingswimming
UAfSt =
Laser Body ScanLaser Body Scan
Lenny Krayzelburg Gabrielle Rose
The CFD ProcessThe CFD Process
Courtesy USA SwimmingCourtesy USA Swimming
Static Geometric BodyStatic Geometric Body ModelModel
Typical Joint StructureAnimation SetupAutodesk MAYA
Model Animation Model Animation
Match Dolphin KickMatch Dolphin Kick KinematicsKinematics
Interface with CFDInterface with CFD……ViCar3DViCar3D
Strokes ModeledStrokes Modeled
Strouhal Number vs. Velocity
0.10
0.30
0.50
0.70
0.90
1.10
1.30
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
Length Specicfic Velocity (U/L)
Stro
uhal N
umbe
r
MaleFemaleCetaceanLinear (Male)Linear (Female)Linear (Cetacean)
Vortex Structures and ThrustVortex Structures and Thrust-- Dolphin KickDolphin Kick
Slow kickSlow kick Fast kickFast kick
Vortex Ring Formation
The Ultimate Olympic Swimmer !The Ultimate Olympic Swimmer !
Active Drag and Thrust
Female 1
Female 2
Female 3
Male 1
Male 2
Useful
Total
WW
η=
0
0
( )
( )
Usefull
n nXn
nnn
T U U dt
F U U dt
τ
τη∞
∞
−
=
⋅ −
∑∫
∑∫
2Fc U
cη ∞+
=Ideal Froude Efficiency(Lighthill Slender Body Theory)
Work, Power & EfficiencyWork, Power & Efficiency
Froude Propulsive Efficiency
Actual Froude Efficiency
204.22261.4
59.91262.4
482.73426.4
141.71912.7
Male 2Cetacean
332.337.3639.071.8Male 1
187.434.9416.377.6Female 3
109.332.1289.885.1Female 2
159.723.4290.442.5Female 1
Total Work [J]Useful Work [J]Mean Total Power [Watts]
Mean Useful Power [Watts]
62.975.3
29.455.8
Male 2Cetacean
70.511.2Male 1
60.918.7Female 3
59.929.4Female 2
62.214.6Female 1
Ideal Efficiency ηF [%]Actual Efficiency η [%]
Work, Power & EfficiencyWork, Power & Efficiency
What have we learnt?What have we learnt?Propulsive efficiency of dolphin kick in humans Propulsive efficiency of dolphin kick in humans varies from about 10varies from about 10--30% . 30% . (>55% for dolphins).(>55% for dolphins).
Human dolphin kick constrained by anatomyHuman dolphin kick constrained by anatomy–– Small Small ““flukefluke””
–– Discrete joints that preclude smooth wave Discrete joints that preclude smooth wave (active drag)(active drag)
–– AnteriorAnterior--posterior asymmetry (up and down stroke)posterior asymmetry (up and down stroke)
Almost all the thrust comes from foot Almost all the thrust comes from foot (beyond ankle)(beyond ankle)
Down stroke produces most of the thrustDown stroke produces most of the thrust
Upstroke effectiveness can be improved by Upstroke effectiveness can be improved by increasing ankle flexibilityincreasing ankle flexibility–– ““FloppyFloppy”” ankles are the best for the dolphin kick ankles are the best for the dolphin kick
Biophysics of Phonation Biophysics of Phonation
NIH R01 grant focused NIH R01 grant focused on flowon flow--structural structural interaction in larynxinteraction in larynxUnderstand the FSI Understand the FSI mechanismsmechanismsApply knowledge to Apply knowledge to enhance laryngeal enhance laryngeal surgical procedures.surgical procedures.
GeneratorGenerator(Lungs(Lungs))
VibratorVibrator((LarynxLarynx))
ResonatorResonator((Pharynx,Pharynx,
Nasal cavity,Nasal cavity,Sinuses)Sinuses)
ArticulatorArticulator((Cheek, Cheek, tongue, tongue, Teeth,Teeth,lips)lips)
Medialization LaryngoplastyMedialization LaryngoplastySurgical procedure of choice for unilateral VF Surgical procedure of choice for unilateral VF paralysisparalysis–– Cord injectionCord injection–– Synthetic implant inserted to Synthetic implant inserted to medializemedialize
paretic VFparetic VF
Surgical outcome highly sensitive to implant Surgical outcome highly sensitive to implant shape and placementshape and placement–– Requires mm level precisionRequires mm level precision–– IntraIntra--operative trialoperative trial--andand--error procedureerror procedure
Relatively high revision rate for this surgery Relatively high revision rate for this surgery in the USA.in the USA.
Surgeons have no means of predicting the Surgeons have no means of predicting the effects of the implant on the vibratory effects of the implant on the vibratory characteristics of the paralyzed vocal foldcharacteristics of the paralyzed vocal fold
Can a surgical planning tool based on a Can a surgical planning tool based on a computational biomechanical model of the computational biomechanical model of the larynx improve the surgical outcome ??larynx improve the surgical outcome ?? Current Thyroplasty Procedure
Thyroplasty Implant
Thyroplasty Window
Paretic Vocal Fold
Structural Dynamics of VFStructural Dynamics of VF
Governing equationsGoverning equations
Model assumed in current study
Schematic showing VF substructure
cover
ligament
body
•The tissue materials are assumed to be transversely isotropic.
•Material properties are obtained from experiments (e.g., Titze et al 2000).
•Multi-property, non-homogeneous structure
3D Vocal Fold Model3D Vocal Fold Model
Effects of Tension Imbalance on PhonationSmaller VF vibration amplitude
Lack of full glottal closure leads to leakage flow
“Breathy” voice
Multiple incommensurate frequenciesChaotic vibration
Period Doubling
Bifurcation
Towards PatientTowards Patient--Specific ModelsSpecific Models
Sagittal View
Axial View
Computation of Voiced Sound Computation of Voiced Sound GenerationGeneration
45
Flow field in Vocal tractFlow field in Vocal tract
46
t/T
dQ/d
t
0 1 2 3 4 5-10
0
10
t/T0
P10 12 14 16 18
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
Hydrodynamic pressure near the vocal tract inlet
Time derivative of glottal flow rate
Frequency [Hz]
SP
L[d
B]
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 30000
20
40
60
80
100
120
Acoustic fieldAcoustic field
47
t/T0
∆p'
10 12 14 16 18 20
-1
0
1
X 10-4
Acoustic pressure at 60 cm from the mouth
New Initiative in Cardiovascular New Initiative in Cardiovascular FlowsFlows
Forty years after the seminal work of Peskin!
Simulation of LeftSimulation of Left--Ventricle FlowVentricle Flow
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
PostdocsPostdocs and Studentsand Students–– XudongXudong ZhengZheng, Jung, Jung--HeeHee SeoSeo, , QianQian XueXue, , LingxiaoLingxiao
ZhengZheng, , EhsanEhsan Aram, Rajneesh Aram, Rajneesh BhardwajBhardwaj
CollaboratorsCollaborators–– Dr. Dr. FadyFady NajjarNajjar (LLNL), Prof. Frank Fish (Westchester (LLNL), Prof. Frank Fish (Westchester
University), Prof. Ryan University), Prof. Ryan VallanceVallance (GWU), Prof. James (GWU), Prof. James Hahn (GWU), Dr. Steve Hahn (GWU), Dr. Steve BielamowiczBielamowicz, Prof. Tyson , Prof. Tyson Hedrick (UNC)Hedrick (UNC)
SponsorsSponsors–– AFOSR, NIH, NSF, USA Swimming, NASAAFOSR, NIH, NSF, USA Swimming, NASA
Questions?Questions?
Looking for a postdoc to work on cardiovascular flow modeling !