A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were...

19
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996,28 (4),537-555 A set of 254 Snodgrass- Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity M. CARMEN SANFELIU and ANGEL FERNANDEZ Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain The Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) picture set was standardized for a Spanish sample (N = 261). The present article shows the main results, but more explicitly, it shows the differences between En- . glish and Spanish data. This evidence justifies the statement that normative data of cognitive stimuli cannot be taken into another language directly, because object names that are very common in one lan- guage may not be so in another, or objects that have a specific name in one language may have a generic name in another, and so on. Finally, because of the potential usefulness of the data for bilingualism stud- ies, the Spanish data are presented jointly with the English data. Often, cognitive research requires that the material to be processed be selected according to very specific, experimenter-defined characteristics. One way in which that selection can be effectively achieved is through the use of normative databases. Norms for verbal material have been in use for many years (see Bradshaw, 1984, and Brown, 1976, for reviews of early work) and continue to be used (see, e.g., Benjafield & Muckenheim, 1989; Er- ickson, Gaffney, & Heath, 1987; Ferraro & Kellas, 1990; Gibson & Watkins, 1988; Graff & Williams, 1987; Wil- son, 1988). Fewer normative data, however, have been collected for pictorial stimuli. Until the last decade it was difficult to establish comparisons among studies in which picto- rial stimuli were used due to the fact that different pictures or drawings were utilized in each study. This lack of stim- ulus homogeneity often resulted in a real difficulty for comparing and interpreting results. A turning point was the publication of Snodgrass and Vanderwart's (1980) well- known paper, which provided a thorough report of nor- mative data for a set of260 line drawings. Snodgrass and Vanderwart attended to dimensions such as name, famil- iarity, visual complexity, and agreement between mental images and pictures. This standardized set of drawings was soon used in ex- periments in which processing differences between words The authors would like to thank Joan Gay Snodgrass for sending the set of pictures, as well as for her permission to publish the data from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). We would also like to thank Emi- liano Diez for his work in the design and implementation of the com- puter program, and Olga Fernandez, Ildefonso Mendez, Emilio 1. Martin, and Marcos Perez for their help in the data collection. Corre- spondence should be addressed to M. C. Sanfeliu, Departamento de Psicologia Basica, Psicobiologia y Metodologia, Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad de Salamanca, Avda. de la Merced, 109-113,37005, Sala- manca, Spain (e-mail: [email protected]). and pictures were investigated, both in semantic and epi- sodic memory tasks. The topic of word-picture differences is central in modern cognitive research and has led psy- chologists to the discovery of important facts and to the elaboration of sophisticated theories. For example, it has been found that naming time is shorter for words than for pictures, although categorization is faster for pictures than for words (Potter & Faulconer, 1975; Snodgrass & McCul- lough, 1986, Vanderwart, 1984). Another important prob- lem concerning word-picture differences is the picture su- periority effect in memory tasks. The discovery of this phenomenon stimulated the development of theoretical ac- counts of intervening memory structures and processes, such as the dual coding hypothesis (Paivio, 1971, 1983) and the sensory-semantic model (Nelson, Reed, & Walling, 1976). Both approaches have shown considerable merit in the attempt to account for recall and recognition data (Mantyla, 1986; see Bajo & Canas, 1988a, 1988b, for reviews). However, several discrepancies-like those aris- ing from the utilization of different materials-need to be resolved. The use of standardized materials can contribute to the reduction of the disparities among experimental pro- cedures and, in that way,provide a firmer basis for the com- parison of both results and theoretical accounts. Another area in which the use of standardized pictorial materials has proven to be important is perceptual identi- fication and recognition. Examples of progress in this area are found in work on recognition thresholds (Kroll & Pot- ter, 1984; Snodgrass, 1984; Snodgrass & Corwin, 1988; Snodgrass & Poster, 1992) and on recognition of object and non-object drawings (Mou, Anderson, Vaughan, & Rouse, 1989). Finally, drawings have been used increas- ingly in experiments aimed at the study of implicit mem- ory. Recent work with pictures has demonstrated that the effects found with verbal materials are readily replicable when drawings are used. Snodgrass and Vanderwart's 537 Copyright 1996 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Transcript of A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were...

Page 1: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers1996,28 (4),537-555

A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart picturesstandardized for Spanish:

Norms for name agreement, image agreement,familiarity, and visual complexity

M.CARMEN SANFELIU and ANGEL FERNANDEZUniversidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

The Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980)picture set was standardized for a Spanish sample (N = 261).The present article shows the main results, but more explicitly, it shows the differences between En- .glish and Spanish data. This evidence justifies the statement that normative data of cognitive stimulicannot be taken into another language directly, because object names that are very common in one lan­guage may not be so in another, or objects that have a specific name in one language may have a genericname in another, and so on. Finally, because of the potential usefulness of the data for bilingualism stud­ies, the Spanish data are presented jointly with the English data.

Often, cognitive research requires that the material tobe processed be selected according to very specific,experimenter-defined characteristics. One way in whichthat selection can be effectively achieved is through theuse ofnormative databases. Norms for verbal material havebeen in use for many years (see Bradshaw, 1984, andBrown, 1976, for reviews of early work) and continue tobe used (see, e.g., Benjafield & Muckenheim, 1989; Er­ickson, Gaffney, & Heath, 1987; Ferraro & Kellas, 1990;Gibson & Watkins, 1988; Graff & Williams, 1987; Wil­son, 1988).

Fewer normative data, however, have been collectedfor pictorial stimuli. Until the last decade it was difficultto establish comparisons among studies in which picto­rial stimuli were used due to the fact that different picturesor drawings were utilized in each study. This lack ofstim­ulus homogeneity often resulted in a real difficulty forcomparing and interpreting results. A turning point was thepublication of Snodgrass and Vanderwart's (1980) well­known paper, which provided a thorough report of nor­mative data for a set of260 line drawings. Snodgrass andVanderwart attended to dimensions such as name, famil­iarity, visual complexity, and agreement between mentalimages and pictures.

This standardized set of drawings was soon used in ex­periments in which processing differences between words

The authors would like to thank Joan Gay Snodgrass for sending theset of pictures, as well as for her permission to publish the data fromSnodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). We would also like to thank Emi­liano Diez for his work in the design and implementation of the com­puter program, and Olga Fernandez, Ildefonso Mendez, Emilio 1.Martin, and Marcos Perez for their help in the data collection. Corre­spondence should be addressed to M. C. Sanfeliu, Departamento dePsicologia Basica, Psicobiologia y Metodologia, Facultad de Psicologia,Universidad de Salamanca, Avda. de la Merced, 109-113,37005, Sala­manca, Spain (e-mail: [email protected]).

and pictures were investigated, both in semantic and epi­sodic memory tasks. The topic ofword-picture differencesis central in modern cognitive research and has led psy­chologists to the discovery of important facts and to theelaboration of sophisticated theories. For example, it hasbeen found that naming time is shorter for words than forpictures, although categorization is faster for pictures thanfor words (Potter & Faulconer, 1975; Snodgrass & McCul­lough, 1986, Vanderwart, 1984). Another important prob­lem concerning word-picture differences is the picture su­periority effect in memory tasks. The discovery of thisphenomenon stimulated the development oftheoretical ac­counts of intervening memory structures and processes,such as the dual coding hypothesis (Paivio, 1971, 1983)and the sensory-semantic model (Nelson, Reed, &Walling, 1976). Both approaches have shown considerablemerit in the attempt to account for recall and recognitiondata (Mantyla, 1986; see Bajo & Canas, 1988a, 1988b, forreviews). However, several discrepancies-like those aris­ing from the utilization of different materials-need to beresolved. The use of standardized materials can contributeto the reduction ofthe disparities among experimental pro­cedures and, in that way,provide a firmer basis for the com­parison ofboth results and theoretical accounts.

Another area in which the use of standardized pictorialmaterials has proven to be important is perceptual identi­fication and recognition. Examples ofprogress in this areaare found in work on recognition thresholds (Kroll & Pot­ter, 1984; Snodgrass, 1984; Snodgrass & Corwin, 1988;Snodgrass & Poster, 1992) and on recognition of objectand non-object drawings (Mou, Anderson, Vaughan, &Rouse, 1989). Finally, drawings have been used increas­ingly in experiments aimed at the study of implicit mem­ory. Recent work with pictures has demonstrated that theeffects found with verbal materials are readily replicablewhen drawings are used. Snodgrass and Vanderwart's

537 Copyright 1996 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Page 2: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

538 SANFELIU AND FERNANDEZ

(1980) original set of standardized drawings has beenmodified to build series with eight levels of increasingfragmentation (Snodgrass, Smith, Feenan, & Corwin,1987). The series have been used in experiments in whichprior exposure can prime both word and picture frag­ments (Feenan & Snodgrass, 1990; Hirshman, Snodgrass,Mindes, & Feenan, 1990; Snodgrass & Feenan, 1990;Snodgrass & Surprenant, 1989). This line ofresearch hasrecently been extended by the construction ofa series ofgradually degraded verbal material consisting ofeight lev­els of increasing fragmentation ofthe names of the Snod­grass and Vanderwartpictures (Snodgrass & Poster, 1992).

This review is far from exhaustive, but it clearly sup­ports the view that the standardization of pictorial stim­uli, such as the set of Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980)drawings, has had an unquestionably positive effect onresearch devoted to the study ofpicture processing. At thesame time, further work is needed to expand the originalwork on picture standardization to other contexts becauseofnorm generalization difficulties. One case in which thatwork is necessary is the collection of normative data in dif­ferent linguistic and sociocultural contexts. Objects thatare common in a given culture might be less common inanother culture; pictures that evoke a very specific andconcrete name in English might evoke a more generalterm in another language; or images that show a high levelof name agreement for English speakers might showhigher variability in a different community of speakers.Because of these and related problems, a serious effortshould be devoted to the empirical validation ofall kindsof normative data with appropriate population samples.The research reported in this paper is part ofan effort tocollect adequate normative data for pictorial stimuli inthe Spanish-speaking population.

Several studies have focused on the task of obtainingnormative data for verbal stimuli in Spanish. The firstquantitative report was made available by Juilland andChang-Rodriguez (1964), who developed a frequencyindex for Spanish words. In more recent years, other re­searchers have presented additional normative data forverbal material (see Dasi, 1986, for a listing and review ofavailable norms). Special mention has to be made to thework of Algarabel and his colleagues at the Universidadde Valencia (Algarabel, Ruiz, & Sanmartin, 1988; Algar­abel, Sanmartin, Garcia, & Espert, 1986; Pascual, Gotor,Miralles, & Algarabel, 1979). They have made a very sys­tematic attempt to collect norms for words, attending toseveral dimensions (category membership, free associa­tion, number ofsyllables, etc.). Furthermore, they have as­sembled the data in a single, 16,000-word computerizeddatabase, the University ofValencia's WordPool (UVWP),that allows for easy consultation (Algarabel et aI., 1988).

No comparable approach has been applied to pictorialstimuli. In order to provide researchers with normative dataon pictures that are appropriate for Spanish-speakingsubjects, a study was conducted in which the stimuli were254 line drawings from the set first used by Snodgrassand Vanderwart (1980). Closely following their procedure,norms for name agreement, familiarity, visual complex-

ity,image agreement, picture-name agreement, and imagevariability were collected.

METHOD

SubjectsA total of261 students from introductory courses in psychology

from the Universidad de Salamanca participated in the study. Dif­ferent subjects participated in each of the six tasks. There were 62in the name agreement task, 55 in the image agreement task, 51 inthe familiarity task, 59 in the complexity task, and 19 and 15 in thesubsidiary tasks of picture-name agreement and image variabilityagreement, respectively. All the subjects were native Spanishspeakers and participated voluntarily as a course activity. Each ses­sion was run in small groups of up to 5 people.

MaterialsThe stimuli were a set of 254 pictures from Snodgrass and Van­

derwart (1980). A digitized version ofthe drawings was used to pre­sent them on a Macintosh SE/30computer screen. Three ofthe tasksrequired auditory presentation ofnames. These auditory stimuli weredigitized, stored in the computer, and presented through a loud­speaker. A custom-made program controlled presentation ofvisualand auditory stimuli in all the tasks.

ProcedureThe procedure closely followed the steps described by Snodgrass

and Vanderwart (1980), both in terms ofthe tasks performed and inthe way the tasks were done. The only difference was that in our studyall the stimulus presentation processes were controlled by a micro­computer. Drawings were randomly presented in the center of thescreen inside a 95 X 130 rom frame over a white background. Soundswere amplified to a perfectly audible level. Subjects sat in a quiet roomin front ofthe computer screen at a distance ofapproximately 1.5 m.

The six different tasks were run in a similar way. At the beginningof every session in each task, subjects were read the instructionsand encouraged to answer carefully and consistently. They weregiven individual answer sheets and instructed to respond to everydrawing. The total amount of time was between 40 min for thequicker task and I h for the slower one, with one or two 3-min breaksdepending on the length of the session. Each picture was presentedfor a period of 4 sec, and there was a 4-sec interstimulus delay dur­ing which subjects had to rate the stimulus according to the in­structions for each task.

In the name agreement task, subjects had to identify the drawingwith the first name that came to mind and write the name on the an­swer sheet. If that was not possible, they had to indicate whether thereason was "don't know object" (DKO), "don't know name" (DKN),or "tip of the tongue" (TOT).

In the familiarity task, subjects had to rate the degree to whichthe object represented in the drawing was familiar to them, basingtheir rating on the frequency with which they came across the ob­ject in everyday life. Their answer to each item was a whole num­ber from a 5-point rating scale (I = a very unfamiliar object, 5 =a very familiar object).

The visual complexity task required the subjects to rate the com­plexity of each drawing, rather than the complexity of the object itrepresented. They also had to provide ratings from a 5-point scale(I = drawing very simple, 5 = drawing very complex).

In the image agreement task, subjects were asked to estimate howsimilar each picture was to a mental image of an object they hadpreviously been asked to form. First, while the screen remainedblack, they heard the name of the object through the loudspeaker,and had 3 sec to form a mental image of it. After that, a picture ofthe object was presented on the screen. From that moment they had4 sec to rate the degree of agreement between their mental imageand the picture (I = low agreement, 5 = high agreement). If theycould form no image, they were instructed to write the letters NI,

Page 3: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

and if the formed image corresponded to a different object, theyhad to write the letters DO. The name used with each picture wasthe most common name given to the object in the name agreementtask. Nine ofthe drawings were excluded from this and the next twotasks because they failed to reach a 30% level of agreement in thename agreement task. The level of agreement was low for severaldifferent reasons, such as the use of a category label instead of theconcrete object name, confusion with similar-looking objects, ob­ject not known, and so on.

In the picture-name agreement task, subjects listened to the nameand saw the picture at the same time. After each picture-name pre­sentation, subjects had 4 sec to rate, on a 5-point scale, how closelythe picture matched the way they expected the named object tolook. In the last task, image variability, subjects listened to the namealone and then they had to indicate, using a 5-point scale (1 = fewimages, 5 = many images), whether the name evoked few or manydifferent images.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A summary of the rating data obtained from our sam­ples ofSpanish-speaking subjects is presented in Appen­dix A. Blank responses were not taken into account inthe computation ofthe ratings. Toallow for easy referenceand data comparison, entries are listed according to theidentifying numbers originally assigned to each drawingby Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). For each picture,the following information is presented: (1) most frequentname given in Spanish; (2) most frequent name in Eng­lish; (3) two measures ofname agreement, the statistic Hand the percentage of subjects producing the most com­mon name; and (4) the means and standard deviations forimage agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, picture­name agreement, and image variability. Along with theratings obtained with Spanish-speaking subjects, Appen­dix A also presents the data obtained by Snodgrass andVanderwart with their English-speaking subjects. Thisgrouping and presentation of the data allows for easycomparison ofratings given by the two samples to the samedrawing in each task. Appendix B lists the alternate namesgivento each drawing, with an indicationoftheir frequency.

Table I presents summary statistics for the followingindices: H (reflecting name agreement), percentage, imageagreement, familiarity, and complexity. The table con-

PICTURES STANDARDIZED FOR SPANISH 539

tains the summary for both the Spanish-speaking samplesand the English-speaking samples reported by Snodgrassand Vanderwart (1980). Although H and percentage aretwo measures of name agreement, following Snodgrassand Vanderwart's arguments, 1 we will use H as the mea­sure ofname agreement. Separate t tests were conductedto compare the ratings given in each of these dimensionsby Spanish speakers and English speakers in response tothe 254 drawings that were common to both studies. Therewere small but significant differences for familiarity andcomplexity. In the English-speaking sample the pictureswere judged more familiar than those in the Spanish one[t(253) = 4.32]. The reason seems quite obvious: Pic­tures were selected in the American context (things likea baseball bat, a football helmet, or a kettle are more fa­miliar to English speakers in America than to Spanishspeakers in Spain). With regard to complexity, the Span­ish sample judged the pictures as slightly more simplethan did the English-speaking one (t(253) = 6.60]. Per­haps the different size of the pictures reproduced by theslide projector or by the computer can account for the dif­ference. There is a larger significant difference when the Hvalue is considered [t(253) = 7.97]. The English-speakingsample had bigger H values than did the Spanish one. Be­cause H is an index of name agreement, it seems that thesample in our group showed less variability in the numberofnames applied to objects than did the English-speakingsample. Although the comparisons are rather global, thedifferences found are evidence that normative data forthis kind ofstimuli should be collected for different pop­ulations, because the responses that stimuli evoke in dif­ferent tasks can vary across cultures and/or languages.

Given this result, we performed a qualitative compari­son ofthose Spanish-English pairs whose difference wasexaggerated (we selected those scores 2 standard devia­tions above or below the mean). Following this criterionwe found 39 pairs for which the Spanish word surpassedthe English one in such a difference, but only 8 pairs forwhich the English word exceeded the Spanish one in sucha difference. The analysis of all these pairs helped us tofind some reasons for the discrepancy. One is that thereis a larger proportion of compound common words in

Table 1Summary Statistics for All Variables: Spanish and U.S.A. Samples

Picture-NameH* % Image Agreement Familiarity Complexity Agreement Variability

U.S.A. Spain U.S.A. Spain U.S.A. Spain U.S.A. Spain U.S.A. Spain (Spain) (Spain)

M 0.56 0.27t 86.59 82.30 3.69 3.71 3.29 3.12t 2.96 2.67t 4.06 2.61SD 0.53 0.41 14.34 21.68 0.58 0.60 0.96 1.11 0.89 0.93 0.49 0.59Median 0.42 0.12 3.72 3.84 3.32 3.06 2.93 2.52 4.11 2.6Mode 0 4.11 1.53 2.05 4.47 2.53Range 2.55 2.19 67 91.9 2.68 3.03 3.72 3.67 3.78 3.68 2.74 3.13Min 0 0 33 8 2.05 1.74 1.18 1.27 I 1.05 2.26 1.05Max 2.55 2.19 100 100 4.73 4.77 4.9 4.94 4.78 4.73 5 4.13QI 0.12 0.04 3.27 3.29 2.49 .2.16 2.28 1.98 3.74 2.16Q3 0.87 0.28 4.15 4.16 4.09 4.08 3.59 3.39 4.42 3.13Skew 1.5 2.39 -1.38 -1.42 0.96 -0.71 0.93 0.01 1.02 0.28 -0.57 -0.06Kurtosis 5.79 1.49 1.06 0.01 -1.32 -0.89 0.19 -0.49Validcases 260 254 260 254 260 245 260 254 260 254 245 245

*Increasing H values indicate decreasing name agreement. "Significanr t test differences at p < .0 I.

Page 4: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

540 SANFELIU AND FERNANDEZ

English than in Spanish: In 14 ofthe 39 pairs, the Englishword was a compound (e.g., avian-airplane, sartim­frying pan, collar-necklace, pincel-paintbrush, bolsa­pocketbook,patin-roller skate, rnaleta-suitcase, regadera­watering can). Another reason is that the number ofalter­native names was always superior for the member withless agreement (8/8 for the pairs superior in English and31/39 for the pairs superior in Spanish). We also thoughtabout two other possible reasons: (I) the possibility thata higher H in one ofthe languages was due to the existenceofa very frequentsynonym (e.g., barril/tonel-barrel, cuenco/tazon-bowl, clavo/punta-nail, etc.) and (2) the use ofge­neric words instead ofspecific ones (e.g., shirt instead ofblouse, pan instead offrying pan, skate instead of rollerskate, glass instead of wineglass, etc.).

In conclusion, a detailed consultation of the ratingsobtained for each drawing with a particular sample is theoptimal strategy for selecting stimuli to be used withsubjects from that population.

Correlations Among the MeasuresThree correlational analyses were performed on the

data. The first one correlated the data provided by Snod­grass and Vanderwart (1980) with the data obtained inthe present study for H, image agreement, familiarity,and visual complexity. As shown in Table 2, there werefairly high and significant correlations for all the vari­ables. Correlations were higher for complexity and fa­miliarity than for name agreement (H and %) and imageagreement. This is probably because complexity and fa­miliarity werejudgments that were produced directly aboutthe picture or the object it represented, but not about theword used to name it. On the other hand, name agree­ment and image agreement were directly dependent onwords and the particular structure oflanguage. This pat­tern ofcorrelations is similar to that found for a Japanesesample (Matsukawa, 1983), for whom the lower correla­tions were also H values, percentage, and image agree­ment, demonstrating that naming pictures is not equallydirect in all languages (Table 2).

The second correlational analysis involved the dataobtained in the present study. Each measured variable

Table 2Significant Correlations Among the Measured Variables

in the Spanish and U.S.A. Samples(for Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures)

U.S.A. Sample*

Variable NA (H) % IA Fam Comp

Spanish sampleName agreement (H) .268Name agreement (%) .427Image agreement .557Familiarity .739Visual complexity .740

Japanese samplet .258 .185 .409 .858 .941

Note-v-Nx, name agreement; lA, image agreement; Fam, familiarity;Comp, visual complexity. All listed correlation coefficients for the cur­rent study and the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) study are signifi­cant at p < .0 I. *Results from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980)."Results from Matsukawa (1983).

was correlated with the rest. Table 3 shows the signifi­cant correlations, which overall are not too different fromthe ones obtained by Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980).Moreover, they are also similar to the ones obtained withchildren (Berman, Friedman, Hamberger, & Snodgrass,1989), Japanese (Matsukawa, 1983), and Dutch (vanSchagen, Tamsma, Bruggemann, Jackson, & Michon,1983) samples.

The third correlational analysis involved a compari­son between the variables measured in the present studyand the 11 variables for which the UVWP (Algarabel et aI.,1988) contains data. Table 4 shows the significant corre­lations obtained for the data from drawings that had theirmost frequently given name included in the word data­base. There is a high correlation (.52) between familiar­ity of the object depicted in the drawing and familiarityof the word. Also high were the correlations of imagevariability with two word variables: number ofattributes(.43) and meaningfulness (.46).

Factor AnalysisAccording to Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980), the

interrelations among name agreement, familiarity, visualcomplexity, and image agreement were quite low, sug-

Table 3Significant Correlations Among the Measured Variables in a Spanish Sample,

for Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) Pictures, and Between Themand the Juilland and Chang-Rodriguez (1964) Frequencies

Variable NA (H) % IA Fam Comp Freq PicName 1-Var

Name agreement (H) 1.000Name agreement (%) - .740 1.000Image agreement .218 1.000Familiarity - .155 1.000Visual complexity -.136 -.4591.000Frequency .214 1.000Picture-name agreement .723 - .206 1.000Image variability - .276 .30 - .286 .327 - .349 1.000

Note-i-All listed correlation coefficients for the current study are significant at p < .01. NA, nameagreement; lA, image agreement; Fam, familiarity; Comp, visual complexity; Freq, frequency; Pic­Name, picture-name agreement; l-Var, image variability.

Page 5: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

PICTURES STANDARDIZED FOR SPANISH 541

Table 4Significant Correlations Among Picture Variables and (UVWP)

Variables for the Concepts Available in the UVWP

scriptive ratings for a number ofpicture attributes of thedrawings previously presented by Snodgrass and Van­derwart (1980) with English-speaking subjects are nowavailable for Spanish-speaking subjects. With these data,pictures can be selected in a more accurate way becausetheir indices are specific for Spanish-speaking subjects.The different comparisons between the English and Span­ish ratings (and also Japanese; see Table 2) show that,despite the pictures being judged to be of similar com­plexity and familiarity, name agreement and image agree­ment are specific to the particular language.

Twoalternative explanations can be offered to explainthe differences found between our study and the originalone: The differences might be due to either language orcultural context. If differences in name agreement andimage agreement were due exclusively to cultural con­text, the familiarity correlations would not be so high;correlations of.74 in our sample and .86 in the Japanesesample suggest that the cultural contexts are comparableand very similar (i.e., objects that are familiar in one con­text are familiar in the other). However, even if this ar­gument were correct, the question remains open. Perhapsif another experiment were conducted with Spanish­speaking people living in the United States, the problemcould be solved. The finding ofhigh correlations betweensuch a sample and our sample for name agreement andimage agreement would indicate that the present differ­ences are due to language. Higher correlations betweensuch a sample and the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980)sample, by contrast, would indicate that the present dif­ferences were due to culture.

Inthe absence of relevant data, the question of lan­guage versus culture remains open and clearly in need offurther investigation. In the interim, attention should bepaid to the issue ofgeneralization of the results obtainedwith Spanish speakers from Spain to other groups ofSpan­ish speakers. Although Spanish speakers share a basiccorpus oflexical and grammatical knowledge, it might bethe case that different groups of Spanish speakers wouldshow different patterns ofresults because ofdialectal andcultural influences.

REFERENCES

.437

.462-.194

.251

Fam Comp PicName I-Var

.262

.173 -.128 .269

.214 .183-.214

Picture Norms

IANA(H)Word Norms

Letter meanings"Letter frequency]Letters"ImageryMeaningfulnessAttribute - .231Concreteness .217Categorizability .229 .218 .193Familiarity - .206 .526 - .259 .192Pleasantness .180 .269Syllables· - .158

Note-All listed correlation coefficients for the current results are sig­nificant atp < .05. All valid cases equal 85, except in • (211 valid cases)and t (89 valid cases). NA, name agreement; lA, image agreement;Fam, familiarity; Comp, visual complexity; PicName, picture-nameagreement; I-var, image variability.

gesting that the four measures represented largely inde­pendent attributes of the pictures. They also assumed thatpicture-name agreement and image variability were twovariations ofthe image agreement task, and so the ratingsin those two tasks related to the same attribute ofpictures.To examine these assumptions and to obtain further dataon the structure of attributes, we conducted a principalcomponents factor analysis and a varimax rotation.

The analysis showed that only four factors explainedaltogether 88% of the variance. Table 5 shows that Fac­tor 1 loads on image agreement and picture-name agree­ment. This fact is congruent with the assumption thatboth variables refer to the same underlying attribute ofpictures. However, Factor 2 loads positively on complex­ity and negatively on familiarity, implying that visuallycomplex pictures tend to be unfamiliar, or, in other words,familiar objects are usually simple. Factor 3 shows thatimage variability is independent of image agreement. Itseems that variability of images is closer to the richnessof the concept (familiarity might be implied) than to thevividness of the image the concept activates. Finally,Factor 4 loads on name agreement, a result that reflectsthe independence of this attribute.

CONCLUSION

The main goal of the present research was to collectnormative data for pictorial stimuli that could be used inresearch with Spanish-speaking samples. As a result, de-

TableSFactor Analysis (Varimax Rotation)

Variable I 2 3 4

Name agreement (H) - .083 .035 - .152 .981Image agreement .915 -.061 -.135 -.094Familiarity -.128 -.757 .419 .001Visual complexity -.065 .915 .121 .044Picture-name agreement .919 .089 -.138 -.010Image variability -.214 -.066 .917 -.175

ALGARABEL, S., RUIZ, J. c. & SANMARTIN, J. (1988). The Universityof Valencia's computerized word pool. Behavior Research Methods,Instruments. & Computers, 20, 398-403.

ALGARABEL, S., SANMARTIN, J., GARciA, J., & ESPERT, R. (1986). Nor­mas de asociacion libre para investigacion experimental. Unpub­lished manuscript, Universidad de Valencia, Departamento de Psico­logia Experimental.

BAJO, M. T., & CANAS, J. J. (1988a). Dibujos y palabras: Diferencias enprocesamiento. Psicologica, 9, 209-224.

BAJO, M. T., & CANAS, J. J. (I 988b). Dibujos y palabras: Diferencias enestructuras. Psicologica, 9, 225-240.

BENJAFIELD, J., & MUCKENHEIM, R. (1989). Dates of entry and mea­sures of imagery, concreteness, goodness, and familiarity for 1,046words sampled from the Oxford English Dictionary. Behavior Re­search Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 21, 31-52.

BERMAN, S., FRIEDMAN, D., HAMBERGER, M., & SNODGRASS, J. G.(1989). Developmental picture norms: Relationships between name

Page 6: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

542 SANFELIU AND FERNANDEZ

agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity for child and adult rat­ings of two sets of line drawings. Behavior Research Methods, Instru­ments, & Computers, 21, 371-382.

BRADSHAW, J. L. (1984). A guide to norms, ratings and lists. Memory &Cognition, 12, 202-206.

BROWN, A. S. (1976). Catalog of scaled verbal material. Memory &Cognition,4,1-45.

DASf, C. (1986). Guia de indices y datos normativos sobre material ver­bal. Psicologica, 7, 99-102.

ERICKSON, J. R., GAFFNEY, C. R., & HEATH, W. P.(1987). Difficulty andfamiliarity norms for 192 single-solution word fragments. BehaviorResearch Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19,370-376.

FEENAN, K., & SNODGRASS, J. G. (1990). The effect of context on dis­crimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words.Memory & Cognition, 18,515-527.

FERRARO, E R., & KELLAS, G. (1990). Normative data for number ofword meanings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Com­puters, 22, 491-498.

GIBSON, J. M., & WATKINS, M. J. (1988). A pool of 1,086 words withunique two-letter fragments. Behavior Research Methods, Instru­ments, & Computers, 22, 390-397.

GRAFF, P., & WILLIAMS, D. (1987). Completion norms for 40 three­letter word stems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Com­puters, 19, 422-445.

HIRSHMAN, E., SNODGRASS, J. G., MINDES, J., & FEENAN, K. (1990).Conceptual priming in fragment completion. Journal ofExperimen­tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16,634-647.

JUILLAND, A., & CHANG-RoDRIGUEZ, E. (1964). Frequency dictionaryofSpanish words. London: Mouton.

KROLL, J. E, & POTTER, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures, andconcepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Jour­nal of VerbalLearning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 39-66.

MANTYLA,1. (1986). Optimizing cue effectiveness: Recall of 500 and600 incidentally learned words. Journal ofExperimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 66-71.

MATSUKAWA, J. (1983). A study ofcharacteristics ofpictorial material(Memoirs of the Faculty of Law and Literature). Shimane University,Shirnane-ken, Japan.

Mou, r..c., ANDERSON, N. S., VAUGHAN, W. S., JR., & ROUSE, R. 0.,JR. (1989). Recognition memory for nonobject drawings. Bulletin ofthe Psychonomic Society, 27, 399-401.

NELSON, D. L., REED, V. S., & WALLING, J. R. (1976). Pictorical supe­riority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learn­ing & Memory, 2, 523-528.

PAIVIO, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt,Rinehart & Winston.

PAIVIO, A. (1983). The empirical case for dual coding. In 1. C. Yuille(Ed.), Imagery, memory and cognition: Essays in honor ofAllanPaivio (pp. 307-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

PASCUAL, J., GOTOR, A., MIRALLES, J. L., & ALGARABEL, S. (1979).Normas categoriales para el estudio de la memoria humana (Aetasdel Congreso Nacional de Psicologia). Valencia, Spain.

POTTER, M. c., & FAULCONER, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pic­tures and words. Nature, 253,437-438.

SNODGRASS, J. G. (1984). Concepts and their surface representations.Journal of VerbalLearning & VerbalBehavior, 23, 3-22.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & CORWIN, J. (1988). Perceptual identificationthresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Van­derwart picture set. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 67, 3-36.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & FEENAN, K. (1990). Priming effects in picturefragment completion: Support for the perceptual closure hypothesis.Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General, 119, 276-298.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & MCCULLOUGH, B. (1986). The role of visual sim­ilarity in picture categorization. Journal ofExperimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12,147-154.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & POSTER, M. (1992). Visual-word recognitionthresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Van­derwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Com­puters, 24, 1-15.

SNODGRASS, J. G., SMITH, B., FEENAN, K., & CORWIN, J. (1987). Frag­menting pictures on the Apple Macintosh computer for experimentaland clinical applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,& Computers, 19,270-274.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & SURPRENANT, A. (1989). Effect of retention inter­val on implicit and explicit memory for pictures. Bulletin ofthe Psy­chonomic Society, 27, 395-398.

SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, famil­iarity, and visual complexity. Journal ofExperimental Psychology:Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.

VANDERWART, M. (1984). Priming by pictures in lexical decision. Jour­nal of VerbalLearning & VerbalBehavior, 23, 67-83.

VAN SCHAGEN, 1.,TAMSMA, N., BRUGGEMANN, E, JACKSON, L. L., & MI­CHON, J. A. (1983). Namen en normen voor plaatjes. Nederlands Ti­jdschrift voor de Psychologie, 38, 236-241.

WILSON, M. (1988). MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usabledictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,& Computers, 20, 6-10.

NOTE

I. 'The H value captures more information about the distribution ofnames across subjects than does the percentage agreement measure. Forexample, if two concepts both are given their dominant name by 60%of the subjects, but one is given a single other name and the second isgiven four other names, both concepts will have equal percentage agree­ment scores, but the first will have a lower H value" (Snodgrass & Van­derwart, 1980, p. 184).

Page 7: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

lXA

Th

efo

lIo

win

gin

form

atio

nis

sho

wn

bel

ow

:th

eid

enti

fyin

gn

um

ber

ofe

ach

pic

ture

(fro

mth

eo

rig

inal

set)

;its

mo

stco

mm

on

Sp

anis

hn

ame;

itsE

ng

lish

nam

efr

om

Sn

od

gra

ssan

dV

and

erw

art'

s(1

98

0)

set;

two

mea

sure

so

fn

ame

agre

emen

t,H

and

per

cen

tag

eag

reem

ent;

the

mea

ns

and

stan

dar

dd

evia

tio

ns

for

rati

ng

so

fim

age

agre

emen

t,fa

mil

iari

ty,

com

ple

x-

ity,

pic

ture

-nam

eag

reem

ent,

and

vari

abil

ity.

Wh

ere

avai

lab

le,

dat

afr

om

the

En

gli

shsa

mp

lear

ep

rese

nte

d.

Vis

ual

Com

plex

ity

Pic

-Nam

eN

ame

Agr

eem

ent

Imag

eA

gree

men

tF

amil

iari

tyA

gree

men

tV

aria

bilit

ySp

anis

hE

nglis

hSp

anis

hE

nglis

hSp

anis

hE

nglis

hS

pani

shE

nglis

h(S

pani

sh)

(Spa

nish

)

Span

ish

Eng

lish

H%

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

1A

cord

eon

Acc

ordi

on0.

1690

0.18

883.

651.

13.

401.

041.

550.

762.

151.

204.

250.

844.

680.

613.

681.

382

12

Avi

anA

irpl

ane

0.00

100

1.77

603.

960.

793.

231.

122.

431.

193.

780.

993.

151.

053.

500.

103.

891.

333.

131.

463

Coc

odri

loA

lliga

tor

0.13

890.

5488

4.11

0.92

3.98

0.85

1.27

0.75

1.65

0.82

3.8

0.96

4.08

0.88

4.42

0.96

1.8

0.94

4A

ncla

Anc

hor

0.03

970.

1793

4.18

0.72

4.32

0.85

1.43

0.9

1.60

0.83

2.07

0.85

2.58

0.70

4.58

0.61

2.33

1.18

5H

orm

iga

Ant

0.18

650.

6481

31.

332.

921.

242.

21.

252.

621.

113.

690.

813.

920.

823.

631.

422.

61.

186

Man

zana

App

le0.

0298

0.16

984.

40.

784.

050.

874.

330.

823.

981.

081.

540.

771.

820.

674.

420.

772.

070.

887

Bra

zoA

rm0.

D7

950.

5390

4.11

0.92

3.95

0.89

4.67

0.97

4.75

0.58

2.2

0.69

2.15

0.61

3.89

1.56

2.53

1.13

8Fl

echa

Arr

ow0.

1492

0.16

981.

741

2.27

1.29

3.04

1.18

3.38

1.23

1.08

0.47

1.05

0.31

3.53

1.39

2.53

0.99

9A

lcac

hofa

Art

icho

ke0.

3089

1.54

523.

961.

153.

441.

472.

441.

22.

291.

453.

120.

933.

720.

774.

32I

1.67

1.11

10C

enic

ero

Ash

tray

0.02

980.

0010

03

1.1

3.20

1.05

3.75

1.4

3.56

1.37

2.03

0.87

2.25

0.89

4.16

1.3

2.6

1.5

11E

spar

rago

Asp

arag

us0.

5873

1.27

693.

021.

343.

501.

262.

631.

352.

681.

382.

690.

973.

320.

793.

531.

612.

331.

0512

Hac

haA

xe0.

0498

0.53

904.

110.

744.

500.

631.

860.

982.

281.

101.

680.

682.

480.

744.

470.

92.

331.

3513

Coc

heci

toB

aby

carr

iage

1.82

321.

0052

3.07

1.32

3.65

1.01

2.61

1.25

2.72

1.14

3.27

0.96

3.42

0.10

3.37

1.57

2.67

1.29

14Pe

lota

Bal

l0.

2368

0.44

932.

851.

152.

841.

192.

821.

153.

201.

211.

920.

822.

280.

813.

531.

53.

531.

0615

Glo

boB

allo

on0.

0010

00.

0010

04.

540.

94.

331.

182.

31.

092.

581.

021.

140.

571.

550.

593.

841.

463.

530.

6416

Pla

tano

Ban

ana

0.00

100

0.00

100

4.36

0.82

4.42

0.70

3.84

1.14

3.65

1.04

1.34

0.63

1.32

0.47

4.16

1.21

2.6

1.24

17C

asa

Bar

n2.

0029

1.31

693.

221.

112.

821.

562.

381.

063.

220.

913.

300.

98'1:

:l .....18

Bar

ril

Bar

rel

1.01

580.

0010

04.

770.

514.

311.

142.

161.

192.

021.

132.

830.

953.

320.

934.

890.

321.

930.

59(1

19B

ate

Bas

ebal

l1.

0648

1.00

524.

21.

024.

580.

701.

520.

793.

681.

151.

20.

411.

200.

404.

321

1.6

0.83

.., C20

Ces

taB

aske

t0.

1697

0.60

902.

770.

992.

621.

232.

290.

992.

180.

973.

711.

074.

300.

843.

581.

33.

20.

94:::0

21O

soB

ear

0.04

980.

5388

3.63

1.16

3.62

1.09

1.51

0.83

1.98

1.01

3.53

0.88

3.68

0.90

3.95

1.27

2.13

1.13

m22

Cam

aB

ed0.

0498

0.00

100

3.49

1.03

3.65

0.99

4.78

0.64

4.72

0.77

2.69

0.93

2.85

0.79

3.79

1.4

3.6

1.06

en en23

Abe

jaB

ee0.

1960

1.65

603.

451.

172.

781.

172.

491.

172.

681.

194.

460.

774.

750.

493.

951.

312.

60.

99~

24C

ucar

acha

Bee

tle0.

2127

2.18

502.

051.

131.

981.

071.

881.

003.

610.

873.

650.

8225

Cin

turo

nB

elt

0.13

870.

0010

03.

980.

832.

920.

944.

431.

062.

200.

931.

640.

762.

620.

663.

891.

292.

931.

1Z

26C

ampa

naB

ell

0.04

980.

1698

3.89

1.13

4.05

1.01

2.47

1.14

4.12

1.05

2.31

0.91

2.00

0.59

4.42

0.84

3.2

0.86

~27

Bic

icle

taB

icyc

le0.

1889

0.53

883.

910.

953.

401.

093.

611.

173.

781.

043.

880.

973.

850.

114.

051.

133.

071.

03:::0

28Pa

jaro

Bir

d0.

8281

0.69

883.

751.

083.

331

.l4

3.45

1.3

3.62

1.16

3.25

0.86

3.25

0.73

3.89

1.41

41

0 .....29

Cam

isa

Blo

use

0.26

441.

8943

3.38

1.11

2.80

1.09

4.37

0.98

4.18

0.97

2.85

0.76

3.10

0.66

4.53

0.77

3.33

1.59

N m30

Lib

roB

ook

0.00

100

0.00

100

3.95

0.95

4.33

1.00

4.84

0.61

4.75

0.54

1.98

0.68

2.10

0.66

4.53

0.96

3.6

1.24

031

Bol

aB

oot

0.06

950.

6988

3.29

1.11

2.28

0.96

4.08

1.15

3.38

1.24

2.22

0.79

2.45

0.70

3.68

1.34

3.13

1.06

>-r

j

32B

otel

laB

ottle

0.00

100

0.28

953.

931.

052.

851.

223.

881.

073.

721.

051.

290.

641.

680.

793.

951.

273.

60.

990

33L

azo

Bow

0.04

981.

2574

3.89

1.17

2.67

1.25

2.67

1.31

2.25

1.18

2.39

0.89

2.75

0.86

3.95

1.13

2.47

0.83

:::034

Cue

nco

Bow

l1.

5534

0.17

954.

350.

83.

790.

893.

881.

094.

180.

921.

410.

651.

820.

804.

161.

212.

271.

33en

35C

aja

Box

0.00

100

0.80

883.

371.

232.

901.

183.

491.

172.

881.

311.

190.

511.

380.

763.

371.

073.

671.

4~

36Pa

nde

mol

deB

read

0.17

420.

8483

3.67

1.2

4.02

1.06

4.22

1.22

4.40

0.83

1.58

0.79

1.95

0.67

3.89

1.2

1.6

0.83

Z .....37

Esc

oba

Bro

om0.

0597

0.00

100

3.82

1.42

4.35

0.73

3.69

1.27

3.42

1.14

2.29

0.83

2.42

0.80

3.79

1.47

2.6

0.99

en38

Cep

illo

Bru

sh0.

1889

0.88

833.

211.

633.

201.

273.

981.

333.

801.

082.

510.

82.

820.

743.

581.

433.

071.

03::r:

39A

utob

usB

us0.

1289

0.00

100

3.62

1.08

4.08

1.01

4.22

0.9

4.50

0.74

4.07

1.08

3.95

0.10

4.11

1.15

2.87

1.36

40M

arip

osa

But

terf

ly0.

0010

00.

0010

04.

070.

923.

920.

852.

691.

192,

921.

173.

530.

974.

250.

774.

320.

823.

41.

18V

I41

Bor

onB

utto

n0.

0298

0.16

984.

480.

934.

480.

924.

10.

963.

851.

261.

460.

652.

020.

734.

580.

612.

671.

23~ V

ol

Page 8: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tinu

ed)

v..

.j:>

.

Pic

-Nam

e.j:

>.

Nam

eA

gree

men

tIm

age

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Vis

ual

Com

plex

ity

Agr

eem

ent

Var

iabi

lity

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

(Spa

nish

)(S

pani

sh)

V1

----

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

H%

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

>-42

Tar

taC

ake

0.22

770.

8483

3.51

\.1

83.

45\.

122.

08\.

I4.

021.

062.

250.

862.

880.

684.

05\.

18

3.13

1.06

Z "Tl

43C

amel

loC

amel

0.47

790.

0095

3.67

1.33

3.92

0.99

1.45

0.88

2.08

1.06

3.29

0.95

3.75

0.73

4.11

1.15

2.67

1.5

tTi

r-'

44V

ela

Can

dle

0.00

100

0.00

100

4.08

0.97

3.85

0.76

4.84

0.54

3.08

\.15

1.53

0.75

2.48

0.90

4.58

0.84

2.8

1.32

245

Can

non

unav

aila

ble

46G

orr

aC

ap0.

3090

0.59

863.

040.

972.

681.

322.

641.

323.

12\.

12

1.76

0.77

2.18

0.74

3.11

1.52

3.27

0.8

~47

Coc

heC

ar0.

0695

1.08

812.

871.

283.

101.

224.

430.

924.

700.

603.

85\.

I4.

050.

953.

581.

574.

13\.

13C

l48

Zan

ahor

iaC

arro

t0.

0298

0.00

100

4.53

0.57

4.5

00.

673.

331.

213.

550.

972.

360.

942.

950.

774.

630.

52.

07\.

16

"Tl

49G

ato

Cat

0.00

100

0.00

100

3.65

1.07

3.78

0.91

3.06

1.36

4.22

0.88

2.71

0.85

3.25

0.94

4.16

0.9

2.93

0.96

tTi

50G

usan

oC

ater

pill

er0.

2642

0.96

792.

651.

422.

381.

231.

90.

961.

720.

813.

421.

043.

580.

103.

161.

342.

471.

06::0 Z

51A

celg

asC

eler

y1.

278

0.83

763.

75\.

14

2.73

1.2

3.40

\.II

3.58

I4.

250.

86>-

52C

aden

aC

hain

0.06

950.

1698

4.18

1.09

4.4

60.

842.

33\.

19

2.82

1.00

2.31

1.05

2.55

0.97

3.89

\.I

3.47

0.99

Z53

Sil

laC

hair

0.00

100

0.00

100

4.47

0.96

3.22

1.28

2.1

\.1

24.

580.

862.

250.

842.

050.

704.

890.

321.

80.

77C

l54

Cer

eza

Ch

erry

0.09

900.

5283

4.33

0.94

4.52

0.81

3.06

\.1

23.

38\.

18

1.31

0.56

1.60

0.62

4.16

1.07

2.13

0.92

tTl

N55

Gal

lina

Chi

cken

0.08

951.

3567

40.

823.

621.

282.

451.

292.

421.

093.

410.

833.

480.

904.

580.

842.

60.

9156

Des

torn

illa

dor

Chi

sel

0.97

152.

3333

3.15

1.22

2.25

1.22

2.46

1.24

2.03

0.74

3.12

0.75

57Ig

lesi

aC

hurc

h0.

0010

00.

4493

2.62

1.24

2.98

1.31

3.49

1.39

3.38

1.34

3.68

\.II

3.28

0.11

3.58

1.39

3.53

1.06

58P

uro

Cig

ar0.

0298

0.00

100

3.22

1.26

2.75

0.92

4.67

0.74

2.35

1.26

2.85

1.08

3.58

0.97

2.26

1.41

2.73

\.1

659

Cig

arro

Cig

aret

te0.

1684

0.16

984.

580.

744.

650.

613.

591.

533.

651.

411.

640.

832.

250.

774.

371.

262.

871.

5160

Rel

ojC

lock

0.10

950.

1698

4.11

1.33

2.20

0.90

3.82

1.01

4.38

0.99

1.63

1.03

2.68

0.88

4.68

0.48

2.93

0.88

61P

inza

Clo

thes

pin

0.16

820.

8381

4.0

90.

823.

721.

363.

980.

952.

801.

472.

150.

872.

820.

924.

420.

841.

81.

0162

Nub

eC

loud

1.21

550.

1795

3.33

1.07

2.85

1.30

3.66

1.47

3.82

\.1

91.

951.

022.

120.

873.

321.

422.

81.

2163

Pay

aso

Clo

wn

0.04

980.

2895

3.11

1.04

3.25

0.89

2.33

\.1

82.

60\.

16

4.22

0.89

4.50

0.81

4.21

\.1

82.

670.

964

Abr

igo

Coa

t1.

0069

0.95

793.

191.

082.

591.

324.

181.

073.

88\.

19

2.54

0.84

2.55

0.67

3.95

1.51

2.87

\.13

65Pe

ine

Co

mb

0.00

100

0.44

934.

290.

983.

780.

854.

510.

814.

520.

872.

140.

922.

380.

834.

370.

962.

130.

8366

Mai

zC

orn

0.21

530.

8881

4.11

0.99

4.08

0.85

2.43

1.2

3.50

1.05

3.47

1.06

3.58

0.86

4.11

1.24

2.07

0.96

67S

ofa

Cou

ch0.

2863

0.92

674.

151.

033.

051.

054.

450.

734.

400.

741.

240.

542.

280.

845

02.

80.

9468

Vac

aC

ow0.

0010

00.

4493

4.15

0.93

3.92

0.90

3.63

\.1

72.

421.

202.

971.

023.

850.

964.

370.

762.

731.

2269

Cor

ona

Cro

wn

0.00

100

0.00

100

3.31

1.08

2.85

0.79

1.49

0.92

1.52

0.81

4.34

0.78

4.25

0.77

3.47

1.43

2.93

0.88

70T

aza

Cup

0.09

940.

4493

3.24

1.2

3.65

1.35

3.75

1.04

4.4

00.

832.

420.

891.

780.

523.

681.

23.

271.

5371

Cie

rvo

Dee

r0.

5679

1.44

764

.24

0.85

3.72

1.05

1.51

0.88

2.22

1.21

3.61

0.87

3.55

0.77

4.47

0.61

1.93

0.8

72E

scri

tori

oD

esk

0.14

450.

3295

2.3

\.1

43.

181.

394.

80.

494.

320.

902.

58I

3.05

0.84

3.74

1.05

2.13

0.74

73P

erro

Dog

0.00

100

0.00

100

3.4

\.I

3.05

1.26

41.

224.

600.

702.

880.

913.

380.

734.

261.

053.

41.

3574

Muf

ieca

Dol

l0.

3365

1.42

712.

371.

212.

281.

072.

781.

352.

92\.

14

3.85

0.98

4.12

0.93

3.11

1.59

3.4

0.83

75B

urro

Don

key

0.18

810.

8786

4.08

0.87

3.48

1.00

1.88

0.97

1.88

0.87

3.51

0.95

3.35

0.69

4.16

1.21

2.33

\.II

76P

uert

aD

oor

0.14

920.

1698

3.4

1.38

3.80

0.87

2.75

1.29

4.68

0.79

2.05

0.88

3.22

0.69

4.11

0.99

3.33

1.23

77Po

rno

Doo

rkno

b1.

9219

0.38

903.

901.

004.

31.

074.

250.

922.

240.

882.

680.

6178

Ves

tido

Dre

ss0.

1192

0.00

100

2.52

1.06

2.30

1.08

3.76

1.35

3.62

1.46

2.14

0.8

2.65

0.65

2.84

1.38

3.6

0.99

79C

orno

daD

ress

er2.

2021

2.55

363.

220.

964.

121.

014.

520.

772.

640.

892.

950.

8980

Tam

bor

Dru

m0.

0597

0.00

983.

781.

053.

711.

054.

041.

062.

60\.

16

2.22

0.87

2.88

0.75

4.68

0.58

2.4

\.1

881

Pato

Duc

k0,

0498

0.28

953.

980.

953.

850.

942.

411.

222.

75\.

II3.

170.

723.

320.

824.

790.

542.

870.

9282

Agu

ila

Eag

le0.

1282

\.1

476

3.4

1.23

3.49

1.26

1.82

1.03

2.42

1.30

4.1

0.8

4.18

0.74

4.26

1.19

2.4

1.24

83O

reja

Ear

0.12

940.

2895

4.42

0.74

4.26

0,93

4.59

0.98

4.5

00.

702.

710.

972.

680.

824.

371.

122.

20.

9484

Ele

fant

eE

leph

ant

0.00

100

0.00

100

4.16

0.83

3.85

0.99

1.43

0.78

2.35

1.04

4.15

0.93

4.12

0.78

4.84

0.37

1.8

0.86

85S

obre

Env

elop

e0.

1492

0.16

983.

931.

074

.70

0.64

4.75

0.69

4.12

0.93

2.19

0.8

1.42

0.59

4.05

1.39

2.73

\.I

86O

joE

ye0.

0010

00.

1698

4.05

0.97

4.15

0.88

4.84

0.54

4.88

0.40

31.

083.

48\.

10

4.47

0.84

3.27

\.1

687

Val

laFe

nce

0.13

660.

9474

3.53

1.15

3.80

1.44

2.76

1.31

3.02

1.06

4.08

0.77

2.55

1.00

3.58

1.22

2.53

1.06

Page 9: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tinu

ed)

Nam

eA

gree

men

tIm

age

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Vis

ual

Com

plex

ity

Pic

-Nam

eA

gree

men

tV

aria

bili

tyS

pani

shE

ngli

shS

pani

shE

ngli

shS

pani

shE

ngli

shS

pani

shE

ngli

sh(S

pani

sh)

(Spa

nish

)

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

H%

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

88D

edo

Fin

ger

0.18

771.

3771

3.65

1.17

4.60

0.66

4.75

0.8

4.78

0.79

2.39

0.97

2.30

0.95

4.42

1.26

2.67

1.45

89Pe

zFi

sh0.

1192

0.00

100

3.62

0.95

3.58

1.05

3.27

1.27

3.28

1.22

3.34

0.9

3.75

1.02

4.32

1.06

3.53

1.13

90B

ande

raFl

ag0.

1390

0.32

953.

561.

243.

221.

192.

121.

132.

901.

281.

420.

591.

880.

463.

741.

453.

271.

1691

Flo

rF

low

er0.

0010

00.

4893

3.08

1.12

3.25

1.01

3.71

1.04

3.88

1.19

2.71

0.91

3.25

0.94

4.11

1.33

3.67

1.4

92F

laut

aF

lute

0.98

440.

6188

2.27

1.25

3.41

1.30

2.03

I2.

451.

222.

580.

814.

150.

852.

791.

232.

530.

9993

Mos

caFl

y0.

0695

1.15

763.

581.

243.

221.

332.

981.

413.

021.

064

0.93

4.10

0.92

3.58

1.43

2.47

1.06

94Pi

eFo

ot0.

0010

00.

2895

4.16

1.01

4.42

0.86

4.71

0.88

4.78

0.69

2.17

0.97

2.18

0.89

4.26

0.87

2.33

1.23

95B

alon

deru

gby

Foo

tbal

l0.

1242

0.00

100

4.33

0.72

4.18

0.92

1.65

1.04

3.55

1.24

2.25

0.8

2.28

0.71

4.84

0.5

1.2

0.41

96C

asco

Foo

tbal

lhe

lmet

0.16

660.

9562

2.56

1.32

4.38

0.76

2.13

1.33

3.15

1.24

2.86

0.82

2.98

0.69

3.53

1.39

2.87

1.06

97T

ened

orFo

rk0.

0010

00.

0010

03.

641.

084.

150.

854.

351.

054.

780.

473.

370.

872.

620.

943.

741.

633.

131.

4698

Zor

roFo

x0.

0797

1.27

744.

150.

973.

491.

201.

670.

971.

950.

843.

490.

864.

020.

854.

420.

772.

330.

999

Tro

mb6

nF

renc

hho

rn0.

1724

1.67

573.

131.

373.

731.

361.

741.

192.

001.

052.

91.

014.

300.

873.

371.

121.

730.

8810

0R

ana

Frog

0.21

860.

0010

04.

150.

843.

601.

022.

571.

392.

481.

052.

150.

933.

421.

054.

370.

682.

130.

8310

1S

arte

nF

ryin

gpa

n0.

0994

1.18

603.

550.

983.

920.

934.

330.

894.

150.

963.

121.

122.

050.

674.

051.

272.

270.

8810

2C

ubo

deba

sura

Gar

bage

bin

1.21

650.

7688

3.48

1.21

4.52

0.74

3.76

1.11

4.08

1.10

2.93

0.87

2.58

0.74

4.21

1.08

1.73

0.96

103

Jira

faG

iraf

fe0.

0010

00.

3295

4.45

0.94

4.48

0.81

1.53

0.99

1.80

0.95

4.42

0.77

4.65

0.73

4.74

0.56

1.87

1.19

104

Vas

oG

lass

0.00

100

0.16

983.

921.

254.

401.

002.

351.

134.

780.

521.

950.

861.

820.

744

1.05

31.

1310

5G

afas

Gla

sses

0.00

100

1.07

643.

621.

113.

810.

943.

511.

744.

001.

302.

20.

742.

850.

854.

051.

222.

81.

0810

6G

uant

eG

love

0.11

920.

1698

3.62

1.01

3.65

1.20

3.94

1.24

3.38

1.06

2.44

0.93

3.02

0.76

3.79

1.13

2.73

1.03

107

Cab

raG

oat

0.42

810.

7786

3.91

1.03

3.46

1.26

1.65

0.89

1.92

1.06

3.14

0.88

3.18

0.77

3.95

1.39

2.87

0.99

108

Gor

ila

Gor

illa

0.29

550.

7976

3.82

1.06

3.58

1.07

1.59

1.06

2.05

1.18

3.69

0.93

3.62

0.86

4.37

0.9

2.47

1.06

""0

109

Uva

sG

rape

s0.

3045

0.38

904.

081.

264.

310.

792.

311.

143.

651.

042.

140.

963.

000.

924.

580.

611.

930.

7..... ("

J11

0S

alta

mon

tes

Gra

ssho

pper

0.55

821.

4771

3.75

1.0

2.

3.55

1.30

3.59

1.12

2.42

1.07

2.24

0.9

4.40

0.80

3.95

1.27

2.27

0.8

>-l

111

Gui

tarr

aG

uita

r0.

0010

00.

1698

4.67

0.55

4.20

1.21

3.14

1.36

3.58

1.09

2.78

0.95

4.00

0.92

4.16

1.38

3.07

1.22

C11

2P

isto

laG

un0.

1987

1.09

744.

020.

933.

851.

051.

511.

012.

681.

193.

170.

873.

520.

814.

161.

173.

21.

32~ tT

l11

3Pe

loH

air

0.83

710.

6490

2.02

1.18

2.71

1.18

4.31

1.14

-4.5

90.

742.

530.

92.

880.

783.

261.

373.

61.

24ti

l

114

Mar

till

Ham

mer

0.03

970.

0010

03.

041.

144.

101.

022.

651.

323.

481.

162.

360.

912.

600.

703.

581.

432.

271.

03ti

l

115

Man

oH

and

0.00

100

0.44

934.

160.

794.

300.

904.

880.

434.

820.

672.

780.

982.

980.

914.

321

2.53

1.19

~11

6P

erch

aH

ange

r0.

0010

00.

7486

3.89

1.19

4.73

0.55

4.35

0.96

4.52

0.67

1.17

0.59

1.20

0.56

4.53

0.51

2.33

0.9

Z11

7A

rpa

Har

p0.

0987

0.00

934.

280.

744.

281.

061.

631.

041.

881.

084.

080.

884.

050.

814.

740.

451.

871.

25~

118

Som

brer

oH

at0.

1095

0.16

984.

051.

333.

651.

224.

670.

653.

181.

001.

20.

612.

350.

794.

321.

162.

531.

68~

119

Cor

azon

Hea

rt0.

0010

00.

0010

04.

281.

314.

490.

984.

140.

983.

721.

161.

050.

221.

000.

003.

741.

193.

131.

190

120

Hel

icop

tero

Hel

icop

ter

0.Q

498

0.32

953.

950.

913.

420.

971.

670.

912.

551.

123.

810.

943.

800.

954.

321.

162.

271.

33-N

121

Cab

allo

Hor

se0.

0010

00.

0010

04.

160.

924.

200.

812.

571.

33.

551.

143.

630.

933.

820.

704.

470.

72.

871.

19tT

l12

2C

asa

Hou

se0.

1387

0.32

952.

841.

132.

651.

114.

361.

064.

381.

043.

361.

033.

900.

943.

421.

53.

531.

550

123

Pla

ncha

Iron

0.00

100

0.32

953.

091.

064.

080.

783.

611.

133.

651.

083.

150.

893.

250.

893.

741.

242.

130.

92'T

j

012

4T

abla

depl

anch

arIr

onin

gbo

ard

0.17

530.

5683

3.52

1.21

4.40

0.77

2.63

1.37

3.50

1.07

2.25

0.71

2.05

0.63

4.11

0.74

3.33

1.45

~12

5C

haqu

eta

Jack

et1.

3953

0.95

812.

281.

252.

220.

914.

490.

74.

001.

143.

030.

953.

250.

803.

111.

333.

130.

92ti

l12

6C

angu

roK

anga

roo

0.05

970.

0010

04.

40.

814.

300.

751.

310.

761.

921.

153.

860.

863.

980.

884.

840.

372

0.76

~12

7T

eter

aK

ettle

0.18

711.

6640

4.02

1.32

3.31

1.11

4.8

0.4

3.80

1.17

2.2

0.94

2.40

0.74

4.79

0.54

1.8

0.77

Z12

8L

lave

Key

0.00

100

0.00

100

2.96

1.26

4.58

0.74

4.65

0.91

4.85

0.42

2.19

0.86

1.92

0.76

3.84

1.3

3.4

1.35

..... til

129

Com

eta

Kite

0.00

100

0.00

100

4.4

0.66

4.10

1.00

1.92

1.02

2.48

1.14

2.44

0.88

2.85

0.69

4.37

0.76

31.

07::r:

130

Cuc

hill

oK

nife

0.13

940.

6090

3.04

1.15

3.25

1.32

4.69

0.68

4.45

0.84

1.49

0.65

1.92

0.68

3.95

1.31

2.73

0.96

131

Esc

aler

aL

adde

r0.

1095

0.16

982.

841.

573.

751.

143.

041.

093.

351.

152.

080.

932.

320.

613.

321.

252.

80.

8613

2L

ampa

raL

amp

0.00

100

0.44

932.

271.

33.

260.

903.

920.

984.

200.

951.

690.

771.

850.

613.

421.

023.

271.

28V

1~

133

Hoj

aL

eaf

0.09

940.

5390

3.6

1.31

3.88

1.12

3.96

1.15

4.30

0.75

2.42

12.

520.

774

13.

81.

08V

1

Page 10: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tin

ued

)V

l.j:

:o.

Pic

-Nam

e0'

1N

ame

Agr

eem

ent

Imag

eA

gree

men

tF

amil

iari

tyV

isua

lC

ompl

exit

yA

gree

men

tV

aria

bili

tyS

pani

shE

ngli

shS

pani

shE

ngli

shS

pani

shE

ngli

shS

pani

shE

ngli

sh(S

pani

sh)

(Spa

nish

)V

JS

pani

shE

ngli

shH

%H

%M

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SDM

SD>

134

Pie

rna

Leg

0.38

901.

111.

543.

641.

054.

650.

84.

650.

822.

150.

742.

550.

842.

841.

32.

531.

13Z

813.

54..

"13

5L

imon

Lem

on0.

0010

00.

0010

04.

580.

924.

350:

943.

710.

943.

251.

221.

370.

641.

850.

694.

840.

51.

731.

03rn t'"

'13

6L

eopa

rdo

Leo

pard

1.17

341.

0776

3.87

1.07

3.68

1.03

1.39

0.83

1.92

0.93

4.25

0.88

4.28

0.81

4.42

0.77

1.8

0.94

-13

7L

echu

gaL

ettu

ce1.

3845

1.14

742.

641.

273.

051.

203.

391.

223.

421.

243.

361.

163.

480.

923.

261.

332.

40.

83e

138

Bom

bill

aL

ight

bulb

0.00

100

0.68

864.

650.

624.

420.

834.

430.

854.

180.

802.

310.

952.

750.

944.

471.

022.

21.

01> Z

139

Inte

rrup

tor

Lig

htsw

itch

0.95

660.

9267

31.

394.

620.

624.

560.

844.

580.

632.

140.

882.

520.

773.

681.

452.

331.

050

140

Leo

nL

ion

0.00

100

0.37

933.

951.

033.

881.

031.

531.

012.

001.

073.

80.

944.

300.

874.

370.

762.

20.

94..

"14

1L

abio

sL

ips

0.16

840.

4493

4.25

0.84

4.1

00.

944.

760.

594.

500.

811.

360.

641.

850.

883.

891.

22.

871.

19tT

l14

2C

angr

ejo

Lob

ster

0.19

370.

3890

2.45

1.39

3.62

1.35

2.18

1.26

2.58

1.24

3.85

0.93

4.48

0.81

3.37

1.01

2.73

1.28

:;>;::l Z

143

Can

dado

Loc

k0.

1984

0.53

884.

560.

693.

511.

402.

781.

253.

181.

182

0.81

2.22

0.69

4.42

1.17

2.27

0.7

>14

4M

anop

laM

itte

n0.

3266

0.96

764.

081.

173.

820.

963.

391.

423.

101.

222.

030.

832.

350.

694.

261.

281.

40.

63Z

145

Mon

oM

onke

y0.

1390

0.32

953.

211.

083.

121.

051.

570.

92.

580.

973.

710.

873.

900.

703.

681.

453.

21.

010

146

Lun

aM

oon

0.00

100

1.68

624.

111.

133.

151.

584.

20.

963.

981.

011.

140.

471.

020.

163.

681.

23.

271.

16tT

lN

147

Mot

oM

otor

cycl

e0.

1889

0.32

953.

21.

283.

641.

053.

371.

343.

251.

094.

560.

734.

780.

473.

471.

263.

21.

0814

8M

onta

naM

ount

ain

0.17

690.

6090

3.65

1.02

3.52

1.12

3.12

1.32

2.70

1.19

2.61

1.13

2.80

1.05

3.63

1.07

3.33

1.23

149

Rat

onM

ouse

0.26

790.

7579

4.35

0.73

4.22

0.91

2.86

1.28

2.45

1.02

2.9

0.99

3.28

0.87

4.26

1.28

3.2

1.32

150

Seta

Mus

hroo

m0.

1895

0.00

983.

870.

863.

781.

111.

530.

952.

881.

233.

711.

033.

120.

714.

051.

132.

871.

3615

1C

lavo

Nai

l1.

2145

0.16

984.

241.

054.

730.

622.

551.

213.

281.

201.

220.

491.

800.

684.

580.

612.

531.

0615

2L

ima

Nai

l-fi

le0.

8374

1.04

673.

151.

13.

561.

262.

841.

283.

151.

391.

980.

923.

181.

004

0.94

2.6

1.3

153

Col

lar

Nec

klac

e0.

1190

1.88

604.

410.

843.

321.

493.

121.

232.

701.

311.

590.

811.

780.

883.

581.

263

0.93

154

Agu

jaN

eedl

e0.

3292

0.86

814.

70.

54.

421.

143.

081.

343.

401.

141.

220.

621.

550.

744.

740.

732.

81.

0815

5N

ariz

No

se0.

0010

00.

1698

4.09

0.93

3.62

1.18

4.69

0.84

4.52

0.87

1.73

0.85

1.60

0.92

4.37

1.16

2.67

0.9

156

Tue

rca

Nut

0.21

690.

9764

4.48

0.75

3.62

1.65

1.75

0.98

2.55

1.28

3.64

0.96

2.30

0.56

4.95

0.23

2.33

1.11

157

Ceb

olla

Oni

on0.

0695

0.00

954.

241.

013.

900.

803.

290.

993.

321.

312.

360.

912.

850.

964.

211.

032.

471.

315

8N

aran

jaO

rang

e0.

4984

0.53

814.

330.

984

.00

1.07

3.82

1.21

3.34

1.26

1.58

0.72

2.12

0.71

3.74

1.24

2.13

1.06

159

Ave

stru

zO

stri

ch0.

4971

0.35

864.

20.

923.

321.

031.

410.

831.

520.

673.

390.

933.

700.

814.

530.

611.

730.

8816

0B

uho

Ow

l0.

1987

0.00

100

3.62

0.97

4.1

00.

921.

821.

112.

221.

063.

91.

034.

220.

724.

630.

762.

671.

1816

1P

ince

lP

aint

brus

h0.

0797

1.06

743.

251.

042.

921.

592.

551.

062.

781.

241.

810.

842.

580.

953.

631.

382

0.65

162

Pan

talo

nPa

nts

0.21

840.

5388

3.33

1.16

3.60

0.92

4.88

0.33

4.55

0.86

1.98

0.82

2.22

0.70

3.68

1.49

3.33

1.11

163

Pavo

real

Pea

cock

0.07

921.

1974

4.05

0.97

3.28

1.28

1.73

0.85

2.90

1.02

4.47

0.92

2.55

0.81

4.47

0.84

2.07

1.03

164

Mel

ocot

onPe

ach

0.68

76I

0.81

793.

980.

853.

640.

973.

651.

142.

051.

051.

490.

654.

750.

434.

320.

892.

071.

116

5C

acah

uete

Pea

nut

0.32

87

'0.

3793

4.49

0.74

4.3

00.

982.

841.

053.

001.

022

0.89

2.82

0.95

4.47

0.77

1.4

0.63

166

Pera

Pear

0.00

100

0.00

100

4.67

0.51

4.62

0.62

4.02

1.05

3.55

1.14

1.19

0.43

1.15

0.36

4.53

0.7

2.27

1.1

167

Bol

igra

foPe

n0.

2274

0.32

953.

251.

243.

221.

044.

940.

314.

780.

722.

170.

913.

150.

943.

891.

452.

871.

4616

8L

apiz

Penc

il0.

1684

0.00

100

4.2

0.73

4.40

0.80

4.9

0.3

4.42

1.00

1.68

0.8

2.32

0.91

4.47

0.77

2.47

0.99

169

Pin

guin

oP

engu

in0.

0010

00.

3890

4.42

0.9

3.22

1.15

1.39

0.75

1.70

0.93

2.58

0.88

2.82

0.70

4.37

0.9

2.8

1.21

170

Pim

ient

oP

eppe

r0.

1482

1.07

673.

221.

133.

641.

283.

061.

292.

921.

292.

050.

782.

480.

954

1.41

2.33

1.23

171

Pia

noP

iano

0.10

950.

7081

4.43

0.91

4.02

1.06

2.16

1.16

3.42

1.48

4.6

90.

74.

580.

774.

740.

562.

871.

1917

2C

erdo

Pig

0.07

920.

6090

4.04

1.02

3.62

1.04

2.27

1.17

2.18

0.97

3.17

0.87

3.00

0.81

4.68

0.58

2.67

0.82

173

Pina

Pin

eapp

le0.

0010

00.

0010

04.

351.

034.

600.

622.

691.

092.

951.

303.

951.

074.

351.

014.

210.

922.

60.

9117

4Pi

paPi

pe0.

0498

0.16

984.

30.

864.

261.

001.

610.

942.

901.

141.

710.

71.

880.

714.

110.

993.

071.

1617

5Ja

rra

Pit

cher

0.11

890.

5488

3.73

1.08

3.62

0.84

3.98

1.22

3.50

0.92

1.81

0.63

1.85

0.57

4.21

0.85

2.93

1.22

176

Ali

cate

sP

lier

s1.

2032

0.38

883.

671.

134.

221.

152.

391.

173.

381.

132.

20.

712.

200.

604.

051.

311.

671.

1117

7E

nchu

fePl

ug0.

1184

0.29

883.

31.

424.

081.

024.

221.

054.

180.

772.

070.

892.

250.

703.

321.

292.

41.

0617

8B

olso

Poc

ketb

ook

0.07

951.

7257

2.93

1.12

3.05

0.92

3.86

1.23

3.95

1.28

2.61

0.97

2.70

0.78

3.53

1.35

3.33

1.11

179

Caz

oPo

t0.

2074

0.86

813.

391.

43.

560.

984

.06

1.07

4.22

0.96

1.85

0.81

2.22

0.69

3.84

1.3

2.6

1.06

Page 11: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tin

ued

)

Nam

eA

gree

men

tIm

age

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Vis

ual

Com

plex

ity

Pic

-Nam

eA

gree

men

tV

aria

bilit

ySp

anis

hE

nglis

hS

pani

shE

nglis

hS

pani

shE

ngli

shS

pani

shE

ngli

sh(S

pani

sh)

(Spa

nish

)

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

H%

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

180

Pata

taPo

tato

0.11

950.

3490

4.3

0.9

3.97

1.14

4.15

1.06

3.46

1.17

1.36

0.66

2.20

1.10

3.89

1.05

2.33

0.72

181

Cal

abaz

aP

umpk

in0.

2587

0.00

984.

240.

924.

181.

182.

261.

243.

081.

352.

120.

792.

600.

704.

530.

72.

470.

9218

2C

onej

oR

abbi

t0.

0010

00.

0010

04.

130.

94.

200.

812.

311.

292.

951.

073.

311.

023.

280.

844.

790.

712.

871.

1318

3M

apac

heR

acco

on1.

0832

0.58

793.

11.

373.

081.

081.

27.0

.72.

201.

234.

250.

824.

400.

834.

260.

871.

40.

6318

4T

ocad

isco

sR

ecor

dpl

ayer

0.49

821.

7350

4.38

0.93

3.35

1.22

3.86

1.02

4.40

0.86

2.05

0.84

3.32

0.93

50

2.6

1.12

185

Fri

gori

fico

Ref

rige

rato

r0.

3553

0.44

934.

130.

823.

851.

134.

410.

944.

680.

652.

070.

832.

200.

604.

110.

882

1.07

186

Rin

ocer

onte

Rhi

noce

ros

0.20

940.

5683

3.95

1.34

3.84

0.93

4.73

0.8

1.52

0.89

30.

814.

150.

853.

161.

53.

331.

2918

7A

nillo

Rin

g0.

2990

0.16

983.

271.

393.

080.

963.

631.

383.

481.

281.

640.

82.

550.

803.

371.

263.

071.

118

8M

eced

ora

Roc

king

chai

r0.

9671

0.53

903.

651.

234.

120.

952.

451.

273.

251.

303.

780.

933.

580.

924.

261.

052.

130.

8318

9Pa

tinR

olle

rsk

ate

0.09

921.

0052

3.75

1.33

3.48

1.36

2.2

1.06

2.25

1.11

3.95

0.75

4.08

0.93

3.95

1.35

2.07

0.8

190

Rod

illo

Rol

ling

pin

0.83

400.

9471

4.43

0.84

4.44

0.96

1.27

0.67

2.22

1.08

4.02

0.92

1.52

0.50

4.58

0.61

1.53

0.83

191

Gal

loR

oost

er0.

5381

1.21

764.

360.

854.

080.

902.

451.

222.

221.

083.

760.

94.

120.

904.

580.

612.

61.

0619

2R

egIa

Rul

er0.

1497

0.16

984.

021.

13.

981.

042.

311.

243.

580.

952.

610.

871.

850.

944.

211.

082.

531.

1919

3B

arco

Sai

lboa

t0.

3039

0.37

932.

351.

143.

250.

992.

11.

192.

921.

173.

730.

873.

580.

923.

051.

183.

331.

419

4Sa

lero

Sal

tsha

ker

0.18

950.

9683

3.42

1.55

4.00

1.12

2.1

1.17

4.18

0.92

2.51

0.99

3.00

0.92

3.21

1.58

3.27

1.1

195

Sand

wic

hS

andw

ich

0.52

840.

0010

02.

71.

43.

550.

973.

271.

224.

450.

971.

660.

863.

420.

862.

741.

332

1.07

196

Sie

rra

Saw

0.18

790.

1698

4.24

0.79

4.55

0.77

2.27

1.25

2.92

1.19

2.46

0.84

2.25

0.62

4.11

0.99

3.13

1.19

197

Tije

ras

Sci

ssor

s0.

1294

0.16

984.

060.

944.

400.

831.

430.

883.

980.

994.

530.

842.

150.

654.

051.

132.

070.

8819

8T

orni

lloSc

rew

0.58

820.

3393

4.4

0.89

3.67

0.89

3.65

1.26

3.20

1.00

1.66

0.73

3.25

0.99

4.68

0.48

2.53

1.25

199

Des

torn

illa

dor

Scr

ewdr

iver

0.29

820.

0098

4.15

0.93

4.30

0.64

2.27

1.22

3.42

1.14

2.12

0.91

2.35

0.73

4.37

1.01

1.93

1.03

200

Cab

alli

tode

mar

Sea

hors

e0.

8255

0.34

884.

1I

0.95

3.58

1.22

1.33

0.77

1.50

0.89

4.17

0.91

4.50

0.71

4.47

0.9

1.33

0.49

'"e20

1Fo

caSe

al0.

1389

0.61

883.

51.

063.

181.

061.

350.

741.

620.

732.

860.

82.

900.

743.

951.

352.

21.

15..... (J

202

Ove

jaSh

eep

0.30

900.

9567

3.56

1.08

3.00

1.11

2.28

1.21

1.85

0.82

3.46

0.9

3.80

0.75

3.68

1.42

2.53

1.19

.....,

203

Cam

isa

Shir

t0.

0797

0.00

100

3.74

1.18

3.86

0.98

4.69

0.73

4.56

0.70

2.85

0.89

3.08

0.79

3.37

1.2

I3.

21.

37C

204

Zap

ato

Shoe

0.00

100

0.28

953.

21.

253.

021.

264.

750.

84.

620.

703.

170.

873.

380.

863.

531.

543.

271.

39i':

ltT

l20

5Fa

lda

Skir

t0.

0597

0.16

982.

911.

173.

281.

103.

751.

443.

641.

531.

360.

641.

400.

583.

261.

733

Itr

:

206

Mof

eta

Skun

k0.

7261

0.16

983.

441.

253.

401.

091.

270.

782.

301.

174.

411.

084.

720.

744.

320.

891.

871.

06r.n

207

Tri

neo

Sled

0.59

570.

0098

3.2

1.31

4.49

0.81

3.75

1.13

2.80

1.03

4.73

0.52

3.05

0.84

41.

23.

130.

99~

208

Car

acol

Snai

l0.

0298

0.51

864.

270.

763.

331.

182.

141.

081.

851.

062.

660.

843.

400.

804.

211.

032.

271.

28Z

209

Ser

pien

teSn

ake

0.16

840.

1698

3.6

1.08

3.54

1.01

3.82

1.18

1.90

1.04

1.81

0.8

4.52

0.81

3.84

1.3

1.8

0.86

~21

0M

uiie

code

niev

eS

now

man

0.06

950.

0010

03.

641.

014.

000.

952.

161.

143.

151.

042.

050.

92.

520.

593.

841.

121.

930.

8i':

l21

1C

alce

tin

Sock

0.00

100

0.00

100

3.98

0.93

3.72

1.00

4.51

0.86

4.52

0.84

1.61

0.67

1.62

0.62

4.21

1.13

3.13

1.36

021

2A

raiia

Spi

der

0.D

794

0.61

883.

241.

252.

951.

162.

271.

222.

281.

103.

191.

173.

680.

853.

791.

323.

270.

88..... N

213

Spi

nnin

gw

heel

unav

aila

ble

tTl

214

Hilo

Spoo

lo

fthr

ead

1.86

291.

5455

3.80

1.44

3.25

1.16

3.12

1.14

3.73

I3.

180.

970

215

Cuc

hara

Spoo

n0.

1690

0.16

984.

180.

94.

101.

114.

670.

774.

500.

891.

860.

862.

020.

824.

580.

841.

80.

68"T

l0

216

Ard

illa

Squ

irre

l0.

0298

0.17

934.

420.

694.

420.

891.

530.

73.

820.

893.

290.

893.

750.

974.

530.

72.

21.

32i':

l21

7E

stre

lla

Star

0.00

100

0.00

100

4.4

0.97

4.41

1.10

3.02

1.35

3.35

1.33

1.19

0.51

1.05

0.22

41.

333.

670.

98r.n

218

Tab

uret

eSt

ool

1.04

680.

1698

4.05

1.13

4.12

1.08

3.25

1.35

3.08

1.13

1.85

0.78

2.32

0.72

4.53

0.7

I0

~21

9C

ocin

aSt

ove

0.12

731.

1276

2.73

1.22

4.10

1.00

4.02

1.19

4.65

0.65

3.83

0.85

4.02

0.94

2.95

1.39

2.47

0.99

Z22

0Fr

esa

Str

awbe

rry

0.00

100

0.17

903.

931.

033.

981.

043.

371.

183.

201.

292.

471.

023.

380.

913.

741.

372.

671.

11..... r.n

221

Mal

eta

Sui

tcas

e0.

0597

1.01

793.

211.

012.

981.

174.

081.

043.

650.

913.

190.

843.

600.

864.

050.

973.

131.

06::I

:22

2So

lSu

n0.

0498

0.00

100

3.22

1.24

4.22

1.08

4.65

0.74

4.90

0.30

2.32

0.94

1.20

0.46

3.68

1.42

2.4

0.99

223

Cis

neSw

an0.

3390

0.64

884.

340.

93.

690.

721.

960.

981.

970.

833.

070.

913.

050.

804.

790.

421.

930.

8822

4Je

rsey

Swea

ter

0.05

970.

9883

3.66

0.98

2.78

1.11

4.94

0.24

4.48

0.74

2.73

0.96

2.90

0.77

3.84

1.17

3.13

1.6

Vl

.j::..

225

Col

umpi

oSw

ing

0.05

970.

1795

3.48

1.41

4.15

0.92

2.48

1.2

3.02

1.24

1.58

0.72

2.72

0.97

4.05

1.18

1.73

0.8

-.l

Page 12: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXA

(Con

tinu

ed)

VI~

Pic

-Nam

e0

0

Nam

eA

gree

men

tIm

age

Agr

eem

ent

Fam

ilia

rity

Vis

ual

Com

plex

ity

Agr

eem

ent

Var

iabi

lity

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

Spani~

Eng

lish

(Spa

nish

)(S

pani

sh)

trx

Spa

nish

Eng

lish

H%

H%

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

MSD

::>22

6M

esa

Tab

le0.

Q4

9895

4.27

1.03

3.42

1.36

4.78

0.67

4.35

0.88

1.41

0.67

1.72

0.77

4.42

0.9

3.27

1.33

Z0.

32..

"22

7T

elef

ono

Tel

epho

ne0.

0010

00.

5986

4.1

I0.

964.

281.

164.

670.

794.

800.

511.

590.

653.

520.

974.

211.

182.

871.

06tT

lt'"

'22

8T

elev

isio

nT

elev

isio

n0.

2845

1.46

523.

61.

244.

000.

824.

650.

774.

820.

383.

440.

973.

220.

964.

470.

73.

21.

08.....

.22

9R

aque

taT

enni

sra

cket

0.00

100

0.62

864.

270.

784.

620.

582.

021.

243.

621.

303.

190.

973.

250.

944.

580.

772.

731.

1C

230

Ded

alT

him

ble

0.11

950.

6383

4.34

0.85

4.26

0.93

2.55

1.32

2.48

1.12

2.22

0.89

3.35

0.82

4.47

0.84

1.53

1.25

~23

1D

edo

Thu

mb

1.31

440.

1698

3.44

1.33

4.48

0.63

4.61

1.06

4.72

0.74

1.97

0.85

2.38

0.97

3.95

1.47

2.2

1.32

t:I23

2C

orba

taT

ie0.

0010

00.

8969

4.19

1.03

4.05

0.94

2.55

1.25

3.80

1.03

2.32

0.73

2.90

0.80

4.53

0.61

2.53

1.25

.."

233

Tig

reT

iger

0.40

900.

3393

3.06

1.28

3.82

1.14

3.24

1.39

2.10

0.92

2.46

0.88

4.62

0.80

3.84

1.38

2.33

1.11

tTl

234

Tos

tado

rT

oast

er1.

2344

0.00

100

3.95

1.1

3.92

0.79

2.27

1.08

4.08

0.90

2.68

1.11

2.78

0.85

4.21

0.71

20.

76~

235

Pie

Toe

0.21

361.

5755

3.55

1.49

4.18

0.83

4.73

0.7

4.48

0.81

1.95

0.75

1.98

0.82

4.53

0.61

2.8

1.01

::>23

6T

omat

eT

omat

o0.

0498

0.80

883.

821.

24.

051.

124.

041.

023.

781.

063.

581.

021.

980.

573.

421.

542.

530.

99Z

237

Cep

illo

dedi

ente

sT

ooth

brus

h0.

1987

0.16

983.

051.

764.

400.

744.

780.

644.

620.

731.

920.

72.

420.

773.

211.

42.

870.

99t:I tT

l23

8Pe

onza

Top

0.10

810.

6886

4.\

10.

883.

461.

051.

961.

041.

880.

982.

491.

022.

650.

824.

470.

91.

731.

1N

239

Tra

ffic

light

unav

aila

ble

240

Tre

nT

rain

0.07

950.

7486

3.42

1.38

3.20

1.38

3.06

1.33

4.15

0.88

3.05

1.02

4.32

0.88

4.11

1.2

1.93

0.8

241

Arb

olT

ree

0.05

970.

0010

03.

891.

183.

521.

004.

061.

084.

680.

613.

951.

113.

700.

814.

260.

873.

81.

0124

2C

amio

nT

ruck

0.04

980.

5390

3.15

1.19

2.80

1.10

3.43

1.28

4.02

0.91

2.59

1.08

2.75

0.86

4.11

1.2

2.6

1.3

243

Tro

mpe

taT

rum

pet

0.13

941.

1079

2.89

1.42

1.53

0.9

2.60

1.26

4.19

1.03

3.58

0.92

244

Tur

tleun

avai

labl

e24

5P

arag

uas

Um

brel

la0.

0298

0.00

100

4.04

1.1

3.92

0.90

3.47

1.12

3.95

0.92

2.85

0.87

3.00

1.05

4.42

1.07

2.47

1.06

246

Jarr

onV

ase

0.07

940.

3295

2.69

1.13

2.72

1.02

2.94

1.19

2.78

1.26

2.93

1.03

3.15

0.66

40.

942.

81.

2\24

7C

hale

coV

est

0.06

950.

1698

3.8

1.0\

3.70

1.10

3.76

1.12

3.48

1.05

2.46

0.73

2.60

0.74

4.37

0.6

2.4

0.91

248

Vio

linV

iolin

0.51

840.

7286

4.42

0.83

4.18

1.05

1.82

1.13

2.68

1.21

4.37

0.69

4.10

0.86

4.74

0.56

2.13

1.25

249

Car

rito

Wag

on0.

1919

0.92

793.

561.

631.

59I

2.50

1.22

3.34

0.98

3.35

0.91

250

Rel

ojW

atch

0.13

860.

4590

2.33

1.35

3.18

1.07

4.41

0.94

4.58

0.73

2.12

0.72

3.40

1.04

3.84

1.3

3.2

1.32

251

Reg

ader

aW

ater

ing

can

0.04

982.

0355

4.13

0.98

4.08

0.98

2.08

1.21

2.72

1.50

3.31

1.04

2.78

0.79

4.47

0.84

3.2

0.94

252

San

dia

Wat

erm

elon

0.16

530.

5586

3.31

1.37

2.85

1.31

21.

113.

051.

094.

390.

832.

280.

924.

111.

292.

130.

9225

3W

ell

unav

aila

ble

254

Rue

daW

heel

0.11

920.

3393

3.84

1.57

3.48

1.36

2.\

61.

212.

221.

041.

460.

652.

420.

834.

420.

691.

931.

0325

5S

ilba

toW

hist

le0.

2174

0.00

100

4.43

0.93

4.55

0.67

2.02

1.21

2.45

0.92

1.78

0.72

2.55

0.84

4.26

1.15

2.53

1.06

256

Mol

ino

Win

dmil

l0.

0994

0.16

983.

391.

113.

351.

081.

651.

051.

801.

004.

660.

734.

620.

763.

951.

392.

271.

0325

7V

enta

naW

indo

w0.

0498

0.32

952.

151.

073.

250.

834.

410.

834.

400.

862.

921.

093.

18

0.86

3.37

1.38

2.53

1.13

258

Cop

aW

ineg

lass

0.04

981.

4350

3.72

1.07

3.31

1.35

4.1

1.04

4.02

1.1\

1.71

0.79

1.85

0.48

4.26

1.15

3.33

1.18

259

LIa

vein

gles

aW

renc

h1.

0652

0.89

763.

131.

232

.5\

1.18

2.24

1.23

2.72

1.28

1.63

0.74

2.02

0.79

3.74

1.33

1.4

0.63

260

Zeb

raun

avai

labl

e

Page 13: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXB

Sh

ow

nh

ere

are

all

the

con

cep

tsfo

rw

hic

ho

ne

or

mo

ren

amin

g,

imag

ing

,o

rid

enti

fica

tio

nfa

ilu

res

occ

urr

ed,

ad

iffe

ren

to

bje

ctw

asim

aged

,or

mo

reth

ano

ne

nam

ew

asgi

ven.

Fai

lure

sin

the

nam

ing

task

are

list

edas

DK

N(d

on

'tk

no

wn

ame)

,D

KO

(do

n't

kn

ow

ob

ject

),an

dT

OT

(tip

oft

he

ton

gu

e).

Iden

-ti

fica

tio

nfa

ilu

res

inth

efa

mil

iari

tyra

tin

gta

skar

eli

sted

asD

KO

(FA

M).

Imag

ing

fail

ure

sin

the

imag

eag

reem

ent

task

are

list

edas

NI

(no

imag

e),

and

imag

ing

ad

iffe

ren

to

bje

ctas

DO

(dif

fere

nt

ob

ject

).A

Un

on

do

min

ant

nam

esg

iven

for

each

con

cep

tar

eli

sted

and

acco

mp

anie

db

yth

eir

freq

uen

cies

.

DK

OD

KN

DK

OT

OT

(FA

M)

NI

DO

Non

dom

inan

tNam

es

IA

cord

eon

Acc

ordi

on0

05

0I

0S

axof

onI

2A

vion

Air

plan

e0

00

00

03

Coc

odri

loA

llig

ator

00

I0

00

Cai

man

2,la

gart

o4

4A

ncla

Anc

hor

00

20

00

5H

orm

iga

Ant

III

I0

00

Ara

na2,

inse

cto

3,m

osqu

ito

46

Man

zana

App

le0

0I

00

07

Bra

zoA

rm0

00

00

0C

odo

2,m

ano

I8

Flec

haA

rrow

00

00

215

Sefi

alS

9A

lcac

hofa

Art

icho

ke0

I3

I6

0C

olif

lor

I,pi

fia

I,re

poll

oI

10C

enic

ero

Ash

tray

I0

00

0I

IIE

spar

rago

Asp

arag

us6

50

2I

0A

stil

laI,

cofi

aI,

puer

roI,

ram

a3

12H

acha

Axe

00

00

I0

Mac

heta

I13

Coc

heci

toB

aby

Car

riag

eI

0I

0I

8C

arri

coch

e12

,car

rito

7,ca

rrit

ode

bebe

I,ca

rrit

ode

nino

2,ca

rro

deni

no4,

coch

e2,

coch

eco

nca

pota

I,co

che

debe

beI,

coch

ede

nino

I,si

llaI,

silla

deni

no2,

sill

eta

I14

Pelo

taB

all

00

02

00

Bal

on19

,bol

aI

15G

lobo

Bal

loon

00

0I

07

16Pl

atan

oB

anan

a0

00

00

0""C

17C

asa

32

I2

Alm

acen

I,ca

bana

2,ca

sade

cam

poI,

case

taI,

casi

taI,

......

Bar

no

cobe

rtiz

o2,

edif

icio

I,es

tabl

o2,

fabr

ica

8,ga

raje

I,gr

aner

o10

,>

-lgr

anja

6,m

olin

oI,

paja

rI

e ;::tl

18B

arri

lB

arre

l0

05

0I

2B

idon

I,cu

ba2,

cube

taI,

cubo

2,to

nel

15tI

119

Bat

eB

aseb

all

30

3I

29

Bas

ton

I,ba

tede

beis

bol

20,

palo

I,pa

lode

beis

bol

3,po

rra

Ir:

/J

20C

esta

Bas

ket

00

00

0I

Boi

saI,

cest

ade

cam

poI

r:/J

21O

soB

ear

00

00

45

Oso

pola

rI

~22

Cam

aB

ed0

00

00

0C

ama

dem

atri

mon

ioI

Z23

Abe

jaB

eeI

0I

00

0A

visp

a8,

inse

cto

3,m

osca

10,m

osco

nI,

mos

quit

oI

~24

Cuc

arac

haB

eetle

124

00

Bic

hoI,

esca

raba

jo13

,gri

llo4,

inse

cto

10,m

osca

I;::

tl25

Cin

turo

nB

elt

00

00

00

Cin

to3,

coll

arI,

corr

ea4

t:! ......

26C

ampa

naB

ell

00

00

00

Cam

pani

lla

IN

27B

icic

leta

Bic

ycle

00

00

00

Bic

i7

tI1 t:!

28Pa

jaro

Bir

d0

00

00

0C

anar

io3,

gorr

ion

3,pa

jari

llo

2,pa

jari

to2,

poll

itoI,

polio

I'T

j29

Cam

isa

Blo

use

00

I0

00

Am

eric

ana

3,bl

usa

II,

caza

dora

2,ch

aque

ta18

030

Lib

roB

ook

00

00

00

;::tl

31B

ota

Boo

t0

00

00

3B

ota

deag

uaI,

botin

I,bo

toI

r:/J

32B

otel

laB

ottle

00

00

00

~33

Laz

oB

ow0

00

07

3L

azad

aI

Z34

Cue

nco

Bow

l2

I6

0I

0B

o15,

ensa

lade

raI,

hond

illa

I,pl

ato

I,re

cipi

ente

I,ta

za5,

......

r:/J

tazo

n14

,vas

ija4

::c35

Caj

aB

ox0

00

20

36Pa

nde

mol

deB

read

00

00

0I

Pan

26,

pan

inte

gral

I,pa

nto

stad

oI,

reba

nada

depa

nI,

tost

ada

depa

n2

VI

.j:>

.\0

Page 14: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tinu

ed)

Vl

Vl

DK

O0

DK

ND

KO

TO

T(F

AM

)N

ID

ON

ondo

min

ant

Nam

es

37E

scob

aB

room

00

00

00

Cep

illo

deba

rrel

'I,

esco

mbr

aI

C/)

38C

epil

loB

rush

00

00

I15

Cep

illo

del

peIo

7>-

39A

utob

usB

us0

00

00

0A

utoc

ar3,

bus

3,om

nibu

sI

Z 'Tj

40M

arip

osa

But

terf

ly0

00

00

0tT

l41

Bor

onB

utto

nI

00

00

Ir- -

42T

arta

Cak

e0

00

I0

0P

aste

l10

,qu

eso

4C

43C

amel

loC

amel

20

20

0I

Dro

med

ario

9>-

44V

ela

Can

dle

00

00

03

Z45

Can

non

unav

aila

ble

0 'Tj

46G

orr

aC

ap0

02

I0

IG

orr

o3,

som

brer

oI

tTl

47C

oche

Car

00

00

00

Coc

hazo

I,li

mus

ina

I,ve

hicu

loI

:::048

Zan

ahor

iaC

arro

t0

0I

00

0Z >-

49G

ato

Cat

00

00

I0

Z50

Oru

ga

Cat

erpi

ller

00

I0

00

Cie

mpi

es8,

gusa

node

seda

I,gu

sano

230

51A

ceIg

asC

eler

y16

II10

3A

pio

3,be

reng

ena

I,b

erza

I,co

Iifl

orI,

espi

naca

sI,

hort

aliz

aI,

tTl

nabo

I,pu

erro

2,pu

erro

s3,

rem

olac

haI,

verd

ura

5N

52C

aden

aC

hain

00

20

04

cade

nas

I53

Sil

laC

hai

r0

00

00

054

Cer

eza

Ch

erry

0I

00

00

Cir

ueIa

2,gu

inda

I,m

anza

na2

55G

alli

naC

hick

en0

0I

00

0G

allo

256

Des

torn

illa

dor

Chi

sel

1810

127

Cor

tagi

raI,

esca

fina

I,es

patu

la4,

herr

amie

nta

I,li

ma

4,pu

ncel

I,p

un

zon

I57

Igle

sia

Chu

rch

00

00

00

58Pu

roC

igar

00

I0

00

59C

igar

roC

igar

ette

00

00

00

Cig

arri

llo

9,ta

baco

I60

Rel

ojC

lock

00

00

0I

Rel

ojde

pare

d2,

relo

jde

mes

aI

61P

inza

Clo

thes

pin

00

00

00

AIf

iler

I,p

inza

dero

pa6,

pinz

as4

62N

ube

Clo

udI

10I

220

0A

lgod

on3,

col

2,co

lifl

or3,

espo

nja

3,es

pu

ma

I,m

apa

I,pe

lla

I,so

toI,

tafe

taI

63P

ayas

oC

low

n0

00

00

IC

ara

depa

yaso

I64

Abr

igo

Coa

t0

00

00

IB

ata

9,ba

tin

I,ca

mis

aI,

chaq

ueto

n2,

gaba

rdin

a6

65Pe

ine

Co

mb

00

00

00

66M

aiz

Cor

n0

03

00

0M

azor

ca17

,maz

orca

dem

aiz

7,pi

fia

dem

aiz

I,tr

igo

I67

Sof

aC

ouch

00

00

00

Sil

lon

19,t

resi

llo

468

Vac

aC

ow0

00

00

069

Cor

ona

Cro

wn

00

00

03

70T

aza

Cu

p0

00

0I

0T

azon

3,va

soI

71C

ierv

oD

eer

I0

50

I0

Ale

eI,

arce

I,re

no4,

vena

doI

72E

scri

tori

oD

esk

0I

20

02

Co

mo

da

I,co

nsol

aI,

mes

aco

nca

jone

sI,

mes

ade

escr

ibir

I,m

esa

dees

tudi

o5,

mes

ade

ofi

cin

aI,

mes

ade

trab

ajo

I,m

esa

15,m

esa

escr

itor

io3,

mue

ble

I,pu

pitr

eI

73P

erro

Dog

00

00

00

74M

ufie

caD

oll

00

00

03

Nif

ia2

275

Bur

roD

onke

y0

00

02

0A

sno

II,

poni

I76

Pue

rta

Doo

r0

00

00

3V

enta

na5

77Po

rno

Doo

rkno

b5

210

IA

garr

ader

oI,

bolo

dela

pu

erta

I,lI

aver

oI,

man

ecil

laI,

man

goI,

man

ija

I,m

anil

la7,

man

illa

r3,

man

ille

raI,

man

ivel

a2,

pest

illo

I,pi

capo

rte

8,po

rno

dela

pu

erta

2,po

mul

oI,

tim

bre

I,ti

rado

rI

Page 15: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)D

KO

DK

ND

KO

TO

T(F

AM

)N

ID

ON

ondo

min

ant

Nam

es

78V

estid

oD

ress

00

00

0I

Rop

aI,

traj

e4

79C

orno

daD

ress

erI

07

0A

rmar

io8,

cajo

nI,

cajo

nero

I,ca

jone

s2,

com

odin

5,co

nsol

aI,

coqu

eta

3,es

tant

eI,

mes

a2,

mes

illa

5,m

esita

2,m

uebl

e5,

taqu

illo

n2,

toca

dor

380

Tam

bor

Dru

m0

0I

00

0T

ambo

ril

I81

Pato

Duc

k0

00

00

0O

caI

82A

guila

Eag

le0

00

00

0A

guila

real

I,bu

itre

3,ha

lcon

3,lo

roI,

paja

ro3

83O

reja

Ear

00

00

00

Oid

o4

84E

lefa

nte

Ele

phan

t0

00

00

085

Sobr

eE

nvel

ope

00

00

00

Car

ta5

86O

joE

ye0

00

00

087

Val

laFe

nce

I0

30

00

Bar

rera

I,ce

rca4

,val

lada

I,va

llas

I,ve

rja

9,ve

rjas

I88

Ded

oFi

nger

00

00

00

Ded

oin

dice

5,de

dose

fial

ando

I,in

dice

889

Pez

Fish

00

00

00

Pesc

ado

3,tr

ucha

290

Ban

dera

Flag

I0

I0

I0

Ban

deri

n4

91F1

0rFl

ower

00

00

02

92F1

auta

Flut

e4

173

190

4A

guja

I,ag

uja

depu

nto

I,ba

nder

illa

I,ca

fia

I,fl

auta

trav

eser

aI,

flau

tin3,

term

omet

ro3

93M

osca

Fly

00

I0

00

Bic

hoI,

mos

quit

oI

94Pi

eFo

ot0

00

00

095

Bal

onde

rugb

yFo

otba

ll0

I0

00

0B

alon

16,b

alon

debe

isbo

l9,

halo

nde

futb

olI,

beis

bol

I,bo

las

debe

isbo

lI,

peIo

ta2,

pelo

tade

beis

bol

I,pe

lota

deru

gby

3,ru

gby

I""C

96C

asco

Foot

ball

helm

et1

3I

50

3A

carg

ader

aI,

casc

ode

beis

bol

I,ca

sco

deho

ckey

I,ca

sco

de- o

rugb

y10

,gor

roI,

gorr

ode

rugb

yI,

met

roI

...,97

Ten

edor

Fork

00

00

00

c:::98

Zor

roFo

x0

00

00

0L

obo

2:::0

99T

rom

bon

Fren

chh

om

I35

89

0I

Saxo

fon

5,tr

ompa

2,tr

ompe

taII

,tro

mpe

tinI,

trom

pon

I,vi

ola

ItT

i\/

J10

0R

ana

Frog

00

00

02

Sapo

9\/

J

101

Sart

enFr

ying

pan

00

00

00

Caz

o3,

cazu

ela

I~

102

Cub

ode

basu

raG

arba

gebi

nI

02

00

IB

asur

a5,

basu

rera

I,ba

sure

ro3,

cont

ened

or2,

cubo

5,Z

pape

lera

I,ta

scon

I,tu

boI

010

3Ji

rafa

Gir

affe

00

00

00

>10

4V

aso

Gla

ss0

00

00

3:::0 0

lOS

Gaf

asG

lass

es0

00

00

0-N

106

Gua

nte

Glo

ve0

00

00

0M

ano

3,m

anop

la2

tTi

107

Cab

raG

oat

2I

50

I0

Chi

voI,

ovej

a2,

rebe

coI

ti10

8G

orila

Gor

illa

00

00

00

Chi

mpa

nce

4,m

ono

13,o

rang

utan

II'T

j

109

Uva

sG

rape

s0

00

00

4R

acim

o3,

raci

mo

deuv

as17

,uva

140 :::0

110

Sal

tam

onte

sG

rass

hopp

er3

I2

2I

IC

igar

raI,

grill

o3,

inse

cto

I,m

osqu

ito

2\/

JII

IG

uita

rra

Gui

tar

00

00

00

~11

2Pi

stol

aG

un0

00

00

0R

evol

ver

8Z

113

Pelo

Hai

r0

40

90

2C

abel

lo9,

casc

oI,

pein

ado

I,pe

luca

I,so

mbr

ero

2-\/J

114

Mar

tillo

Ham

mer

I0

I0

00

::r:II

SM

ano

Han

d0

00

00

011

6Pe

rcha

Han

ger

00

00

02

117

Arp

aH

arp

20

50

II

Lir

aI

Vl

118

Som

brer

oH

at0

00

00

0G

orro

3V

l -

Page 16: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tinu

ed)

VI

VI

DK

ON

DK

ND

KO

TO

T(F

AM

)N

ID

ON

ondo

min

ant

Nam

es11

9C

oraz

onH

eart

00

00

02

(/)

120

Hel

icop

tero

Hel

icop

ter

00

00

00

Avi

onI

>-12

1C

abal

loH

orse

00

00

00

Z 'Tj

122

Cas

aH

ouse

00

0I

00

Cab

ana

3,ca

sade

cam

po3,

casi

taI,

chal

etI

tTl

123

Pla

ncha

Iron

00

02

00

r- -12

4T

abla

depl

anch

arIr

onin

gbo

ard

00

30

0I

Mes

aI,

mes

ade

plan

char

17,p

lanc

hado

rI,

plan

char

I,ta

bla

5,C

tabl

ero

depl

anch

aI

>-12

5C

haqu

eta

Jack

etI

0I

0I

0A

brig

oI,

amer

ican

aI,

bata

I,bl

usa

I,ca

mis

a16

,ca

zado

ra2,

Zch

aque

ton

I,ga

ban

I,ga

bard

ina

I,ro

paI,

traj

eI

t:I 'Tj

126

Can

guro

Kan

garo

o0

0I

00

0P

ingi

iino

ItT

l12

7T

eter

aK

ettle

00

00

0I

Ace

iter

aI,

cafe

tera

16,c

azo

dele

che

I::0

128

Lla

veK

ey0

00

00

0Z >-

129

Com

eta

Kite

00

00

II

Z13

0C

uchi

llo

Kni

fe2

0I

00

0P

uerr

oI

t:I13

1E

scal

era

Lad

der

00

I0

06

Esc

aler

ade

man

o2

tTl

132

Lam

para

Lam

p0

00

00

7N

133

Hoj

aL

eaf

00

00

I7

Hoj

ade

arbo

l2,

hoja

depa

rra

213

4P

iern

aL

eg0

00

00

IPi

e4,

rodi

lla

213

5L

imon

Lem

on0

00

00

013

6L

eopa

rdo

Leo

pard

00

I0

20

Gue

pard

oI,

jagu

arI,

pant

era

4,pu

ma

3,tig

re21

137

Lec

huga

Let

tuce

34

27

II

Ber

za,

2,co

l10

,col

iflo

r7,

espo

nja

I,ho

rtal

iza

I,pe

loI,

repo

llo

2,ve

rdur

aI

138

Bom

bill

aL

ight

bulb

00

00

00

139

Inte

rrup

tor

Lig

htsw

itch

I2

4I

0I

Enc

ende

dor

I,en

chuf

e3,

lIav

ede

Iuz

5,lu

z2,

tim

bre

314

0L

eon

Lio

n0

00

00

014

1L

abio

sL

ips

00

00

00

Boc

a9,

labi

oI

142

Can

grej

oL

obst

er0

08

II

IC

igal

a5,

crus

tace

o3,

esco

rpio

n4,

gam

ba2,

lang

osta

14,

lang

osti

no2,

mar

isco

I14

3C

anda

doL

ock

00

60

00

Cer

radu

raI,

cerr

ojo

314

4M

anop

laM

itten

00

00

I2

Gua

nte

2114

5M

ono

Mon

key

00

00

02

Chi

mpa

nce

4,m

andr

il2

146

Lun

aM

oon

00

00

00

147

Mot

oM

otor

cycl

e0

00

00

0M

otoc

icle

ta7

148

Mon

tana

Mou

ntai

n0

00

00

0C

ima

I,cu

mbr

eI,

mon

te4,

pico

6,pi

code

mon

tana

714

9R

aton

Mou

se0

00

00

IR

ata

1315

0Se

taM

ushr

oom

00

I0

00

Cha

mpi

fion

I,ho

ngo

I15

1C

lavo

Nai

l3

00

00

0B

asto

nI,

c1ar

inet

e1,

punt

a18

,pun

zaI,

torn

illo

1015

2L

ima

Nai

l-fi

le0

I3

II

IB

olig

rafo

I,cu

chil

lo4,

Iija

2,lim

ade

ufia

s3,

nava

ja2

153

Col

lar

Nec

klac

e0

0I

0I

0A

nill

oI,

coll

arde

perl

as4

154

Agu

jaN

eedl

e0

0I

I0

0A

guja

deco

ser

I,al

file

r2,

plum

aI

155

Nar

izN

ose

00

00

00

156

Tue

rca

Nut

30

30

01

Ros

caI,

torn

illo

1215

7C

ebol

laO

nion

I0

00

I0

Ace

lga

I,aj

oI

158

Nar

anja

Ora

nge

30

I6

00

Frut

a3,

gran

ada

I,lim

onI,

pom

elo

I15

9A

vest

ruz

Ost

rich

4I

90

I0

Abu

tard

aI,

gans

oI,

pavo

216

0B

uho

Ow

l0

00

00

0L

echu

za8

161

Pinc

elP

aint

brus

h0

00

00

0P

lum

a216

2P

anta

lon

Pant

s0

0I

00

0P

anta

lone

s9

Page 17: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)D

KO

DK

ND

KO

TO

T(F

AM

)N

ID

ON

ondo

min

ant

Nam

es

163

Pavo

real

Pea

cock

00

30

00

Paj

aro

1,pa

vo1

164

Mel

ocot

onPe

ach

31

23

00

A1b

aric

oque

1,ci

ruel

a1,

man

zana

1,na

ranj

a5,

pelo

tade

rugb

yI

165

Cac

ahue

teP

eanu

t0

50

20

0A

vell

ana

1,m

ani

I,pe

pino

I16

6Pe

raPe

ar0

00

00

016

7B

olig

rafo

Pen

00

00

00

Bol

i14

,plu

ma

216

8L

apiz

Penc

il0

00

00

0L

apic

ero

9,la

piz

con

gom

a1

169

Pin

giii

noP

engu

in0

00

00

017

0P

imie

nto

Pep

per

32

44

10

Tom

ate

217

1Pi

ano

Pia

no0

00

01

IP

iano

deco

la3

172

Cer

doPi

g0

00

00

0C

hon

1,co

chin

o1,

gorr

ino

I,m

arra

noI,

rino

cero

nte

117

3Pi

iiaP

inea

pple

00

00

I5

174

Pipa

Pipe

00

00

08

Pipa

defu

mar

117

5Ja

rra

Pit

cher

00

00

00

Jarr

on5,

tina

ja1,

vasi

ja1

176

Ali

cate

sP

lier

s5

07

01

2A

lica

te16

,he

rram

ient

a2,

tena

za1,

tena

zas

1117

7E

nchu

fePl

ug0

16

00

11C

able

I,in

terr

upto

r2

178

Boi

soP

ocke

tboo

k0

00

00

0B

oIs

a1,

cart

era

217

9C

azo

Pot

10

60

04

Cac

erol

a5,

cazu

ela

418

0P

atat

aPo

tato

I0

I4

I0

Gal

leta

I18

1C

alab

aza

Pum

pkin

2I

3I

00

Nar

anja

I,sa

ndia

I18

2C

onej

oR

abbi

t0

00

00

018

3M

apac

heR

acco

on9

413

05

2A

nim

alI,

cast

or2,

lince

I,m

ofet

a3,

yena

I,zo

rro

818

4T

ocad

isco

sR

ecor

dpl

ayer

I0

50

00

Gir

adis

cos

I,m

agne

tofo

n1,

meg

aI,

pinc

hadi

scos

I,ra

dioc

asse

tte

I"'t

'l18

5F

rigo

rifi

coR

efri

gera

tor

00

00

00

Nev

era

30.....

. o18

6R

inoc

eron

teR

hino

cero

s2

00

00

0H

ipop

otar

noI,

jab

ali

I"'""

I18

7A

nill

oR

ing

II

I3

00

Aro

I,pe

ndie

nte

I,so

rtij

aI

c::::

188

Mec

edor

aR

ocki

ngch

air

00

I0

I2

But

aca

2,ha

mac

a6,

silla

7,si

llon

1,tu

mbo

naI

:::c tTl

189

Patin

Rol

ler

skat

e0

00

00

3M

onop

atin

I,pa

tine

s1,

pati

nete

3tr

:19

0R

odil

loR

olli

ngpi

n9

118

00

2A

mas

ador

5,m

asa

I,m

azo

I,m

azo

deam

asar

1,to

rmo

tr:

191

Gal

loR

oost

er0

0I

00

0G

alli

na10

,pol

ioI

~19

2R

egia

Rul

er0

00

00

0M

etro

2Z

193

Bar

coS

ailb

oat

00

00

I2

Bar

ca2,

barc

ode

vela

17,

vele

ro19

019

4S

aler

oS

alts

hake

r0

I0

00

0F

rasc

oI,

torn

illo

I;» :::c

195

San

dwic

hS

andw

ich

0I

00

0I

Boc

adil

lo6,

boca

ta3

019

6S

ierr

aSa

w0

02

00

0S

erru

cho

10,s

ierr

ade

man

oI

......

N19

7T

ijer

asS

ciss

ors

00

00

0I

Tij

era

4tT

l19

8T

orni

llo

Scre

wI

00

00

0C

lavo

7,pu

nta

2,tu

erca

I0

199

Des

torn

illa

dor

Scr

ewdr

iver

40

50

00

Tor

nava

sI,

torn

illo

I'T

j

200

Cab

alli

tode

mar

Sea

hors

e3

04

0I

0C

abal

lode

mar

19,c

amal

eon

I,ca

raco

lde

mar

10 :::c

201

Foca

Seal

I0

00

I0

Mar

mot

a1,

mor

sa5

o:20

2O

veja

She

ep2

00

II

0C

amer

o3,

cord

ero

I~

203

Cam

isa

Shi

rt0

00

0I

0B

lusa

2Z

204

Zap

ato

Shoe

00

00

00

......

r.n20

5Fa

lda

Ski

rt0

00

00

0Fa

ldon

1,m

andi

l1

::z::

206

Mof

eta

Sku

nk5

0II

04

IA

nim

alI,

ardi

lla

3,ca

stor

I,zo

rril

lo3

207

Tri

neo

Sled

310

100

01

Cam

illa

1,es

qui

I,pa

tin

I,pa

tine

teI

208

Car

acol

Snai

l0

0I

00

0V

l

209

Ser

pien

teS

nake

00

00

00

Cul

ebra

9,vi

bora

IV

lV

J

Page 18: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)V

lV

l

DK

O.j::

>.

DK

ND

KO

TO

T(F

AM

)N

ID

ON

ondo

min

ant

Nam

es

210

Muf

ieco

deni

eve

Sno

wm

an0

0I

00

0E

span

tapa

jaro

sI,

hom

bre

deni

eve

IC

/)

211

Cal

ceti

nSo

ck0

00

00

0;I>

-

212

Ara

naS

pide

rI

00

00

0A

racn

ido

I,cu

cara

cha

I,in

sect

aI

Z 'Tj

213

Spi

nnin

gw

heel

unav

aila

ble

t'Ii

214

Hil0

Spo

olo

fth

read

I0

I0

Bob

ina

9,bo

bina

dehi

la13

,ca

fia

dehi

lo1,

carr

ete

8,ca

rro

del' ......

hilo

1,cu

erda

2,en

rall

ado

I,ov

illo

2,ov

illo

dehi

lo3,

rollo

Cde

hila

1;I>

-21

5C

ucha

raS

poon

00

00

00

Cuc

hari

lla

6Z

216

Ard

illa

Squ

irre

l1

00

00

00 'T

j21

7E

stre

lla

Star

00

00

00

t'Ii

218

Tab

uret

eSt

ool

00

20

00

Ban

coI,

banq

ueta

6,bu

taca

2,si

lla6,

tajo

3;;0

219

Coc

ina

Stov

e0

01

00

4C

ocin

ael

ectr

ica

1,co

cini

lla

5,es

tufa

1,fo

gon

1,h

om

illo

1,Z ;I>

-h

om

o6,

lava

dora

1Z

220

Fres

aS

traw

berr

y0

00

01

00

221

Mal

eta

Sui

tcas

e0

00

01

1C

arte

ra1,

mal

etin

1t'I

i22

2So

lSu

n0

00

00

0B

ola

1N

223

Cis

neSw

an0

02

02

0G

anso

I,oc

a1,

pato

222

4Je

rsey

Sw

eate

r0

00

00

2C

amis

a1,

suet

er1

225

Col

umpi

oS

win

g0

00

31

2B

alan

cin

1,si

llita

122

6M

esa

Tab

le0

00

00

0M

esil

la1

227

Tel

efon

oT

elep

hone

00

00

00

228

Tel

evis

ion

Tel

evis

ion

00

00

00

Tel

e3,

tele

viso

r24

,T

V7

229

Raq

ueta

Ten

nis

rack

et0

00

00

023

0D

edal

Thi

mbl

e1

01

02

0T

apon

123

1D

edo

Thu

mb

10

00

00

Ded

ogo

rdo

4,de

dode

lam

ano

2,de

dopu

lgar

6,m

ano

1,pu

lgar

2123

2C

orba

taT

ie0

00

01

023

3T

igre

Tig

er0

00

00

IL

eopa

rdo

4,lin

ce1,

pant

era

123

4T

osta

dor

Toa

ster

04

40

00

Bal

anza

1,b

rasa

do

r1,

caja

fuer

te1,

carr

oI,

sand

wic

hera

I,to

stad

era

4,to

stad

ora

1823

5Pi

eT

oe0

00

00

0D

edo

5,de

dogo

rdo

3,de

dode

lpi

e16

,de

dos

2,de

dos

delo

spi

es11

,pul

gar

1,un

a2

236

Tom

ate

Tom

ato

00

00

00

Fru

ta1

237

Cep

illo

dedi

ente

sT

ooth

brus

h0

00

0I

15C

epil

lo1

238

Peo

nza

Top

10

30

00

Pep

ion

2,pe

rigo

nza

1,pe

tanc

a1,

tror

nbon

1,tr

ompo

323

9T

raff

iclig

htun

avai

labl

e24

0T

ren

Tra

in0

00

00

0L

ocom

otor

a2,

tren

rapi

doI

241

Arb

olT

ree

00

00

00

Enc

ina

1,ro

ble

124

2C

arni

onT

ruck

00

00

00

Tra

iler

124

3T

rom

peta

Tru

mpe

t1

02

0F

laut

aI

244

Tur

tleun

avai

labl

e24

5P

arag

uas

Um

brel

laI

00

00

024

6Ja

rron

Vas

e0

01

I0

IF

lore

roI,

jarr

a1,

jarr

on

chin

oI

247

Cha

leco

Ves

t0

02

00

0C

haqu

eta

I24

8V

iolin

Vio

lin0

00

00

0C

ontr

abaj

oI,

guit

arra

1,vi

olon

chel

o6

249

Car

rito

Wag

on11

66

0C

arre

ta4,

carr

etil

la7,

carr

etil

lo4,

carr

icoc

heI,

carr

o6,

coch

ecit

o2,

pati

n3

250

Rel

ojW

atch

00

00

13

Rel

ojde

man

e1,

relo

jde

rnuf

ieca

I,re

loj

depu

lser

a7

Page 19: A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized ... · task. Nine ofthe drawings were excludedfrom this and the next two tasks because they failed to reach a 30% level ofagreement

AP

PE

ND

IXB

(Con

tin

ued

)D

KO

DK

ND

KO

TO

T(F

AM

)N

ID

ON

ondo

min

antN

ames

251

Reg

ader

aW

ater

ing

can

00

00

02

Reg

ador

I25

2S

andi

aW

ater

mel

on0

00

I0

0C

ata

desa

ndia

I,lim

onI,

mel

on6,

raja

dem

elon

6,ra

jade

sand

ia12

,rod

aja

desa

ndia

I,ta

jada

desa

ndia

I,tr

ozo

desa

ndia

I25

3W

ell

unav

aila

ble

254

Rue

daW

heel

00

00

06

Rue

dade

carr

o4,

rued

ade

mad

era

I25

5Si

lbat

oW

hist

le0

0I

0I

IPi

to14

,que

soI

256

Mol

ino

Win

dmill

00

00

I0

Asp

asI,

mol

ino

devi

ento

325

7V

enta

naW

indo

w0

00

00

IPu

erta

I25

8C

opa

Win

egla

ss0

00

00

IV

aso

I25

9L

lave

ingl

esa

Wre

nch

4I

90

25

Alic

ates

I,he

rram

ient

a2,

llave

9,lla

vede

herr

amie

nta

I,lla

vern

ecan

ica

I,lla

vetu

erca

I,tu

erca

I26

0Z

ebra

unav

aila

ble

(Man

uscr

ipt

rece

ived

Nov

embe

r21

,19

94;

revi

sion

acce

pted

for

publ

icat

ion

Sep

tem

ber

6,19

95.)

""C n o-l

C ~ en en ~ Z ~ § ......

N tTl

t:I 'Tj o ::0 en ~ Z ......

en == VI

VI

VI