A service framework and roadmap for the development of ...€¦ · Further, opportunities for...
Transcript of A service framework and roadmap for the development of ...€¦ · Further, opportunities for...
A service framework and roadmap for the development of care systems for heart attack and stroke in Kyrgyzstan
Prepared for the Ministry of Health of Kyrgyzstan
By the WHO Regional Office for Europe
A service framework and roadmap for the development of care systems for heart attack and stroke in Kyrgyzstan
Prepared for the Ministry of Health of Kyrgyzstan
By the WHO Regional Office for Europe
AbstractCardiovascular diseases (CVD) cause 50% of all deaths in Kyrgyzstan, and premature mortality from CVD is still high. Clinical care of CVD is costly and prolonged. The roadmap aims to create and transform existing networks, implement better clinical guidelines, use resources more effectively, improve infrastructure and improve performance management. Further, mapping the organization of regional centres for specialized care in acute myocardial infraction and stroke will improve the time indicators of specialized treatment. The roadmap outlines core acute care interventions in acute myocardial infraction and stroke with key design of services and proposes strategic directions to accelerate gains in CVD management.
KeywordsCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES – PREVENTION AND CONTROLSTROKE – PREVENTION AND CONTROLDELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE – METHODSHEALTH SERVICESKYRGYZSTAN
Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to:PublicationsWHO Regional Office for EuropeUN City, Marmorvej 51DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkAlternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
© World Health Organization 2018All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The views expressed by authors, editors, or expert groups do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.
iii
ContentsAbbreviations and acronyms iv
Acknowledgements v
Executive summary vi
Introduction 1
Policy context 1
Guiding principles 1
Core interventions 2
Model of care 3
Prehospital care 3
Hospital care 5
Posthospital care 7
Standards of care and quality indicators 8
Transforming services 8
Roadmap 8
Roles and responsibilities 8
Mechanisms 8
Next steps 9
Annex 1. Members of the CVD Working Group 12
Annex 2. Recommendations for ambulances 13
Annex 3. Standards and performance indicators 15
Annex 4. Priorities for interventions 24
Annex 5. Summary of the roadmap 29
Annex 6. Summary diagrams of the roadmap 30
Annex 7. Possible model of stroke care rehabilitation 34
iv
Abbreviations and acronymsACS acute coronary syndrome
ADL activities of daily living
AMI acute myocardial infarction
CHADSVASC congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke/TIA and vascular disease (atrial fibrillation risk score calculator)
CT computed tomography
CVD cardiovascular disease
DALY disability-adjusted life-year
ECG electrocardiography
FAST facial drooping, arm weakness, speech difficulties and time to call emergency services
IHD ischaemic heart disease
IADL instrumental activities of daily living
MRI magnetic resonance imaging
NIHSS United States National Institutes of Health stroke scale/score
NSTEMI non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction
PCI percutaneous coronary intervention
STEMI ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction
TIA transient ischaemic attack
v
AcknowledgementsThe authors of the report are: Jill Farrington, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Denmark; Francesca Romana Pezzella, Neurologist, Stroke Unit, San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy and WHO consultant; Alexei Yakovlev, Cardiologist, Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation and WHO consultant. The authors are grateful for the contributions of the working group of Ministry of Health of Kyrgyzstan and to the many cardiologists, neurologists, managers and administrators who supported the development of this Roadmap.
We also extend thanks to David Breuer for text editing.
The evaluation was produced under the overall guidance of Jarno Habicht, WHO Representative of the Country Office in Kyrgyzstan, and Gauden Galea and Bente Mikkelsen, former and current Directors of the Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-course of the WHO Regional Office for Europe.
The WHO Regional Office for Europe and WHO Country Office in Kyrgyzstan coordinated the preparation of this report through the biennial collaborative agreements covering 2016-2017 and 2018–2019 between the Ministry of Health of Kyrgyzstan and WHO.
A voluntary contribution from the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation co-funded the report.
VI
Executive summaryCardiovascular diseases (CVD) cause more deaths than any other cause in Kyrgyzstan. Four of five CVD-related deaths are caused by heart attacks and strokes. CVD affects individuals in their peak mid-life years and undermines the development of countries by depriving valuable human resources in their most productive years.
Acute coronary syndrome and stroke have been the priority and the major theme of the national health reform programme Den Sooluk (2012–2016). In 2016, WHO reviewed acute and rehabilitative services for heart attack and stroke. It demonstrated fragmentation of the clinical pathways and lack of clear implementation of guideline recommendations, with most patients not being diagnosed or treated on time. Further, opportunities for better use of resources, health personnel, technology, equipment and drugs were observed.
In 2017, Kyrgyzstan’s Ministry of Health established a working group to design a service framework and roadmap for the development of care systems for heart attack and stroke in Kyrgyzstan. Under the coordination of the WHO Regional Office for Europe and the WHO Country Office in Kyrgyzstan, guiding principles were defined and the service framework and roadmap of actions over the short, medium and longer term were developed, drawing on local data, documents and regulations.
The roadmap proposes ways to strengthen care for coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease through health system interventions:
• implementing evidence-informed, affordable and sustainable interventions (best buys) for preventing recurrences of myocardial infarction and stroke;
• identifying sustainable strategies for integrating a new model of care into existing health-care infrastructure; and
• building national capacity to meet people’s health-care needs related to heart attack and stroke.
The document was presented to the Ministry of Health, the national working group and the regions in June 2018 and discussed again in September 2018. The latest version of the roadmap received input from recent consultations and letters from the National Centre for Cardiology and Internal Medicine and from the National Hospital for Neurological Care. The Kyrgyz Society of Cardiologists sent comments as well.
Many organizational changes will be required in existing health services to make them more receptive to the needs of people suffering from heart attack and stroke, working in partnership with families, health-care teams and the community, and more effective. This roadmap proposes a way forward for Kyrgyzstan.
1
IntroductionThis roadmap is prepared to follow up the WHO Review of acute care and rehabilitation services for hear attack and stroke in Kyrgyzstan (1), which was presented to the Ministry of Health in spring 2017. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke are major causes of premature mortality and years of life lost in Kyrgyzstan, and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is high. The review identified both strengths and weaknesses within the present services, with significant avoidable mortality and disability and lost opportunities for reducing the disease burden and costs. Its 16 recommendations were grouped into three key messages: manage the existing resources effectively; design the system and direct further investment; and demonstrate success.
The main audience for this document is policy-makers within Kyrgyzstan. Therefore, it seeks to be concise and to refer to other more detailed reports where necessary. It focuses on prehospital, hospital and post-hospital care for heart attacks (acute myocardial infarction (AMI)) and stroke (ischaemic and haemorrhagic).
The document was developed in conjunction with a CVD Working Group appointed by the Ministry of Health. Annex 1 presents the members of the Working Group and meeting dates. The process was led by WHO: the WHO Country Office in Kyrgyzstan, WHO Regional Office for Europe and WHO consultants.
Policy contextThis is not a stand-alone document. It is prepared within (and benefits from) a broader policy context and dynamic process of change within the health sector of Kyrgyzstan. The national health reform programme 2012–2016 Den Sooluk (extended to 2018) will soon be replaced by the Health Sector Strategy for Kyrgyzstan (the Programme for Health System Development until 2030, currently in draft form). A service delivery master plan will be developed during 2018. The eHealth strategy was approved in 2016, and the eHealth architecture was developed in 2017. A ministerial decree on emergency care services, with an action plan, was approved in December 2017. National clinical guidelines for AMI (with ST-elevation (STEMI); without ST-elevation (NSTEMI)) and stroke were updated and approved in late 2017 (2–4). Health system changes are also underway: a review of the State Guaranteed Benefit Package; broader consideration of performance- and results-based financing by the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund; improvement in pharmaceutical policies, including price regulation, pharmacovigilance and procurement practice to improve access to essential drugs, such as centralized procurement at the regional level through hospital or pharmacy chains; and improvements to the quality system and service delivery (recent WHO reviews for both are nearing completion).
Guiding principlesThis document is consistent with guiding principles within relevant international and national policy documents, such as those within the draft Health Sector Strategy for Kyrgyzstan of universal health coverage, reducing inequalities in health and state guarantees ensuring quality-assured, safe and effective health care and population health services. In addition, specific guiding principles for this roadmap are:
• evidence-informed practice;
• improving quality, with data driving the improvement;
• consistency of services across the country, reducing variation in care;
2
• a unified model of care, common principles of organization and coordination, with emergency services, the hospital services, clinical networks and primary care teams planning services together;
• an integrated approach – effective collaboration between personnel providing assistance at different stages and effective communication of health-care providers across boundaries, with patients at the centre; and
• efficient use of resources: for example, sharing such facilities as an angiography suite, especially when resources are limited.
Core interventionsIn conjunction with the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020, WHO has published a set of cost-effective (“best buys”) and effective interventions, which was updated in May 2017 (5). In addition to preventing risk factors such as tobacco and alcohol use, this contains a limited list of interventions for the acute care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stroke and secondary prevention and rehabilitation following acute events:
• drug therapy (including glycaemic control for diabetes mellitus and control of hypertension using a total risk approach) and counselling for individuals who have had a heart attack or stroke and to people with: high risk (≥30%) of a fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular event in the next 10 years or a moderate to high risk (≥20%) of a fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular event in the next 10 years;
• treating new cases of AMI with either: acetylsalicylic acid; acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel; thrombolysis; or primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI);
• cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction;
• anticoagulants for medium-and high-risk non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation;
• treating acute ischaemic stroke with intravenous thrombolytic therapy;
• low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (acetylsalicylic acid) for ischaemic stroke; and
• care of acute stroke and rehabilitation in stroke units.
Only one of these interventions is also a WHO best buy (shown in bold): that is, an effective intervention with cost–effectiveness analysis ≤100 international US dollars per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted in low- and middle-income countries. The rest are WHO “effective interventions”, with cost–effectiveness analysis >100 international dollars per DALY averted in low- and middle-income countries.
In support of the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors, WHO has issued a set of treatment protocols for use in primary health care (6). WHO also publishes a Model List of Essential Medicines (7) that contains lists of drugs recommended for ACS and stroke care. WHO is also preparing a list of priority medical devices for cardiovascular disease, but it has not been published yet.
Other bodies, such as the European Society of Cardiology (8) (and its specific groups) and the European Stroke Organisation (9) have published evidence-informed clinical guidelines relevant to acute care of ACS and stroke, their secondary prevention and rehabilitation that are widely followed within many countries in the WHO European Region. Although not all follow WHO cost–effectiveness and effectiveness criteria, these clinical practice guidelines and scientific literature promote cornerstone interventions for acute care and rehabilitation. Stroke cornerstones in reducing death and disability are: comprehensive and multiprofessional clinical pathways within a stroke network (10–12); endovascular thrombectomy (11); hemicraniectomy (13) in selected cases; standardized nursing protocols such as the fever, sugar and swallowing protocol (14); and comprehensive pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical control of vascular risk factors and rehabilitation (11,15–
3
18). ACS care cornerstone interventions in reducing death and disability are: coronary unit care; emergency reperfusion (PCI or fibrinolysis); treatment of acute complications; antithrombotic therapy; cardiac rehabilitation; and secondary prevention.
Kyrgyzstan has published several relevant evidence-informed clinical guidelines: STEMI (2); NSTEMI (3); and stroke (4). Local recommendations do not describe the principles of organization of care and quality control. Some of the WHO cost-effective and effective interventions (listed above) and the proposed cornerstones for ACS and stroke are included, but not all. Otherwise, they appear to be evidence-informed and also reference the relevant European Society of Cardiology and European Stroke Organisation guidelines. Step-by-step introduction of the best interventions into practice should be supported by national recommendations, documents and instructions and orders of the Ministry of Health, and have implementation monitoring tools.
Model of carePrehospital careSummary of the current situation
The previous report (1) describes the current situation in more detail. In general, the public poorly recognizes the early symptoms and signs of AMI and stroke, and the knowledge and skills for appropriate responses are poor, even among health-care professionals.
The ambulance service does not meet modern standards or the population need. It was not planned countrywide according to important criteria such as population density and the location of emergency health facilities and transport routes, so there is unequal distribution of service and poor access in remote areas. Although some specialized cardiological ambulance teams exist that have been trained in acute cardiac care and have electrocardiography (ECG) equipment and defibrillators, generally vehicles are not equipped with life-saving drugs and equipment and ambulance crews are not trained to carry out key investigations such as ECG or to provide immediate emergency care for acute cardiovascular events.
Future situation
According to the national guidelines for stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and ACS, public information campaigns are needed to raise awareness among laypeople and health-care personnel of the early signs and symptoms of heart attack and stroke and what to do. These can be promoted by government and nongovernmental institutions such as patient and professional organizations such as the Kyrgyz Association of Neurologists and the Kyrgyz Association of Cardiologists. Some materials are already available and being used within the country, such as facial drooping, arm weakness, speech difficulties and time to call emergency services (FAST); other materials are available internationally and can be adapted.
A single emergency care number needs to be promoted so that members of the public call to get an ambulance. Dispatchers need to be trained to give immediate advice to people calling with symptoms of suspected ACS or stroke, maintaining telephone contact with the caller and providing advice on patient management and on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest until appropriately trained and equipped help arrives. Kyrgyzstan’s stroke and TIA guidelines recommend establishing a stroke care service network, establishing a stroke code, a 15-minute prenotification system (19) and a protocol whereby people with suspected strokes are brought to the nearest hospitals that can provide specialized care.
Emergency funding mechanisms should be designed to stimulate the proper application of the best interventions with proven effect to discourage malpractice, providing support for the proper and high quality of health-care services.
In remote areas, where emergency care is difficult to access and the main health provider may be only a feldsher, the nurse needs to be trained and supported (with handbook and telemedicine support) to assess the patient, perform and interpret ECG and give appropriate first response (such as aspirin, pain relief and oxygen) before transporting the patient to an
4
emergency care centre. Kyrgyzstan’s new clinical guideline on STEMI establishes a treatment window of 120 minutes from STEMI diagnosis to primary PCI. This could involve a prehospital setting with a tele-ECG network to select and direct the patient to effective treatment.
There are already plans to modernize emergency care services following adoption of the law, and it is also highlighted as an important topic for action within the draft health-care programme. Emergency services for trauma, ACS and stroke can be planned together. The ambulance response to out-of-hospital medical emergencies can provide basic life support or advanced life support. Basic life support emphasizes rapid transport to the hospital, so basic life support ambulance crews provide only minimal treatment at the scene (“scoop and run”) (20). Ambulance crews using advanced life support are trained and equipped to provide sophisticated care on site (“stay and play”). Apart from improving the ratio and distribution of ambulance to population, the ambulances need to be better equipped to respond to an acute event. Annex 2 lists the equipment and drugs to be included within the ambulance for care of heart attack and stroke.
The road map offers a justified plan of the development of emergency assistance systems for ACS and stroke, which should simultaneously be implemented in the regions for synchronous development and the absence of inequality. In terms of the roadmap, a short-term development (within one year) is to equip ambulances to be able to provide basic life support at a standard level (see Annex 2 for the list of supplies and equipment) and to train ground ambulance personnel to recognize suspected stroke (FAST test) and ACS and start the recommended clinical pathway. A standard ambulance equipped for basic life support seems to offer benefits for nonfatal and longer survival (21) of people with stroke, whereas a specialized cardiological team able to perform thrombolysis for STEMI patients <6 hours after symptom onset in a prehospital setting reduces mortality and disability among people with ACS (see Annex 2 for both the equipment and the medication standard recommended). Therefore, a medium-term development (1–3 years) is to equip ambulances to be able to perform thrombolysis remotely using specialist advanced life support ambulances supported by telemedicine.
A long-term development for stroke care in the prehospital setting would be to develop mobile stroke units if their cost–effectiveness can be demonstrated. A mobile stroke unit is an ambulance dedicated to treating people with acute stroke and similar time-sensitive brain ailments. It contains, in addition to the normal ambulance equipment, a device for brain imaging such as a computed tomography (CT) scanner, a point-of-care laboratory and telemedicine interaction between the ambulance and the hospital (videoconferencing, exchange of videos of patient examination and CT scans). Thus, this specialized ambulance includes all the tools necessary for hyperacute treatment of people with stroke and diagnosis-based triage directly at the emergency site. The use of stroke ambulances increases the percentage of people receiving thrombolysis within the golden hour (22,23). The cost of building and fully equipping a functional mobile stroke unit is estimated to be between US$ 600 000 and US$ 2 million (24). Although currently available cost–effectiveness studies suggest that the expenditure pays off in the long term (25,26), conclusive evidence from clinical trials to support mobile stroke units as being cost effective and improving clinical outcomes is still needed.
Telemedicine support is provided as needed, with a recognized role especially in rural areas. There must be an agreed pre-admission protocol between appropriately trained emergency medical services and the specialist services, with algorithms on dispatch time, assessment, transport strategies within the catchment area and pre-notification that includes: onset time, symptom and sign recognition using a validated tool such as FAST and pre-alert systems. The ambulance crew should provide and record the delivery of appropriate prehospital treatment to people with suspected ACS or stroke and ensure that a defibrillator and someone trained in its use remain at the patient’s side for the whole of the journey from the initial response to the handover in the hospital. Time is heart, time is brain, time is life. The person should be transported to hospital with acute specialist services as quickly as possible and always within a maximum of 1 hour for stroke and 120 minutes for ACS (for STEMI or NSTEMI from diagnosis to reperfusion with complications, for non-complicated NSTEMI 24 hours (time to angiography). The acute stroke service should immediately assess on arrival, enabling timely expert triage of people with acute stroke and the potential for thrombolysis (27).
5
Hospital careSummary of the current situation
There are resources (institutions, equipment, trained personnel, training opportunities etc.) that can be considered as the basis for the formation of the structure of regional networks of care in ACS and stroke. The possibilities are described in the WHO report Review of acute care and rehabilitation of myocardial infarction and stroke in Kyrgyzstan (1). Table 1 gives an overview of the current facilities in the public sector for acute care.
Table 1. Hospital facilities (public sector) for acute care: current situation
Hospital CityACS care
PCIHeart
surgeryStrokecare
CT scan Neurosurgery
National Centre for Cardiology and Therapy
Bishkek + + – – – –
Research Institute of Cardiac Surgery and Organ Transplantation
Bishkek + + + – – –
National Hospital Bishkek – – – + – +
City Hospital No. 1 Bishkek – – – + – –
Chuy Joint Regional Hospital Bishkek – – – + – –
Osh Regional Clinical Hospital Osh + – – + – –
Southern Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery
Jalal–Abad + + – – – –
Naryn Regional Hospital Naryn + – – + – –
Issyk–Kul Regional Hospital Karakol + – – + – –
Talas Regional Hospital Talas + – – + – –
Batken Regional Hospital Batken + – – + – –
For PCI, currently a limited number of patients can be treated because of limited resources: that is, catheters and equipment and physician availability round the clock. Stroke unit care is only partly available, and stroke care pathways and multidisciplinary teams are not fully in place. Currently only a limited number of people with ACS can be treated because of limited resources and expertise.
Future situation
Both stroke and myocardial infarction (ACS) are time-dependent diseases that require an integrated care system approach based on a hospital network and protocols that enable rapid diagnosis and timely access to acute-phase therapy within a well-defined therapeutic window.
To optimize resources, both the ACS and stroke networks should be embedded within a broader emergency care system to homogenize their development, implementation and quality monitoring.
It is proposed that the provision of acute care be reorganized based on a hub-and-spoke arrangement (28) whereby the hub centres would have more advanced equipment, more personnel and more diversified and larger resources.
Multiprofessional collaboration and admission to a dedicated department is critical for clinical outcome related to mortality and disability for both ACS and stroke: patients who receives a package of organized inpatient care are more likely to survive, return home and regain independence than those who receive conventional care in general wards.
6
Where possible, the hubs for ACS and stroke care should be co-located to facilitate the sharing of staff and equipment and care of comorbidities. For stroke, the principle would be one hub (24/7) for 1.5 million population, with 3–4 spokes per hub depending on population density, geographical location and transport routes between centres, as stated by Kyrgyzstan’s prehospital stroke guideline (2017). For ACS, it has been suggested that one PCI hub centre (24/7) is needed per 300 000 to 500 000 population, performing about 600 primary PCI per million population per year (29).
For both ACS and stroke, telemedicine and phone consultation with brain imaging and ECG transmission should be used to empower spokes, triage patients and review cases (as established in Kyrgyzstan’s stroke and TIA guidelines). Given the burden of CVD disease, a similar number of hubs and spokes for ACS as for stroke would be expected.
Final decisions about the distribution of services might be taken once the service delivery master plan is complete. The CVD Working Group initially thought that the proposed service model for delivering acute services should involve four main providers and the local ambulance service. These four main providers would be placed in Bishkek, Jalal-Abad, Osh and Karakol (Fig. 1). This will also need to fit with the Concept for the Development of the Regions of Kyrgyz Republic 2018–2022, which supposes economic development and employment growth in Chui, Jalal-Abad, Issyk-Kul, Osh and Bishkek in 2018–2019 and sees these regions as a priority for developing health care and emergency cardiovascular care.
Fig. 1. Perspective for development of ACS and stroke services: full implementation of hospital and ambulance master plan level
Legend: blue – ACS care; green – stroke care; red – ACS and stroke care.
Ideally, the four main centres and regional and local hospitals should be part of an ACS and/or stroke service network that has agreed protocols for acute patient triage, assessment, transport and possibly for the use of telemedicine to support the appropriateness of diagnosis, thrombolysis and other acute interventions if senior personnel are not available on site to conduct face-to-face assessment.
The principles of service development are that:
• PCI facilities should be available;
• health insurance models are developed with 100% coverage of emergency care in ACS and stroke including thrombolytic therapy and/or PCI (ACS) or thrombectomy (stroke) and models of payment;
• a programme is developed for educating and certifying health-care professionals for the ACS and stroke care system;
7
• prehospital care and logistical models are developed;
• a multilevel system of monitoring, quality control and operational management is created; and
• a public campaign supports early access to emergency specialized medical care.
The barriers to effective ACS care (30), which are also likely to apply to stroke care (31), are as follows:
• patient – social, personal, cultural, financial and religious barriers;
• insurance barrier: low penetration of insurance;
• transport barrier: lack of a centralized ambulance system;
• physician barriers: skills, 24/7 availability and ethics;
• technology barriers: lack of devices, drugs and infrastructure; and
• economic and legislative barriers: lack of legislation supporting infrastructure and resources and reimbursement policies to hospitals and providers.
Posthospital carePeople with stroke and ACS need access to effective rehabilitation services. Stroke rehabilitation is a multidimensional process designed to facilitate the restoration of or adaptation to the loss of physical or mental function when reversal of the underlying pathological process is incomplete. Rehabilitation aims to enhance functional activities and participation in society and thus improve the quality of life. Key aspects of rehabilitation care include multidisciplinary assessment, identification of functional difficulties and their measurement, treatment planning through goal setting, delivery of interventions that may either effect change or support the person in managing persisting change and evaluation of effectiveness.
Summary of the current situation
In Kyrgyzstan, some components of the post-stroke and cardiac rehabilitation process are already in place, but these are limited to Bishkek city. Not all the available interventions are evidence informed. Cardiac rehabilitation facilities are even more limited, and neither post-stroke nor cardiac rehabilitation facilities are organized in a comprehensive clinical pathway.
Future situation
Rehabilitation services are the primary mechanism by which functional recovery and the achievement of independence are promoted among people with acute stroke and ACS. A full comprehensive evaluation (motor, swallowing, cognitive and mental aspects) should be done when the condition of the person with stroke is stable to plan discharge to the proper setting of post-acute care. It has been demonstrated that earlier admission to rehabilitation results in improved overall functional outcomes. People with stroke who are candidates for post-acute rehabilitation should receive organized, coordinated, interprofessional care. Early supported discharge services may be reasonable for people with mild to moderate disability who may attend a rehabilitation programme in outpatient or day service. Evidence indicates that the functional outcomes achieved through stroke rehabilitation are maintained and actually improve for up to one year; by five years after a stroke, functional outcomes plateau and may decline; by 10 years, overall functional outcome scores significantly decline, although it is unclear to what extent the natural ageing process and comorbidity may contribute to these declines. Nevertheless, stroke rehabilitation may be delivered in different settings and with different levels of intensity (see Annex 7 for a possible organization model of setting of care).
Cardiac rehabilitation is a medically supervised programme in which people who experienced heart attack, heart failure, angioplasty or heart surgery receive: exercise counselling and training, education for heart-healthy living to reduce vascular risk factor behaviour and empower cardiovascular-healthy habits. It may be delivered in different settings of care by multiprofessional teams. Primary health care has an important role to play in secondary prevention and preventing further
8
heart attacks and strokes. This requires good communication with specialist care on discharge and systematically identifying and following up patients to control CVD risk factors.
Drug therapy with the main groups of medicines (antiplatelets, statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) for secondary prevention is a method of preventing recurrent myocardial infarction with proven efficacy and should be widely used for all patients. Measures need to be planned to increase the accessibility of therapy (registration, price regulation and benefits) and increase adherence to treatment.
Standards of care and quality indicatorsAnnex 3 suggests a list of evidence-informed standards of care for ACS and stroke together with a set of indicators that can be used for monitoring the achievement of these standards. These are listed alongside the indicators in Annex 3.
Several documents and agencies within Kyrgyzstan propose indicators for monitoring the quality of care for heart attacks and strokes within Kyrgyzstan. These include the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (12 indicators drafted by 19 March 2018) and national clinical guidelines (eight suggested indicators for implementation). A roadmap for quality systems is also being prepared. A general concern is that the indicators suggested may be: difficult to collect routinely and/or may be open to manipulation; not very useful; too complex and comprehensive to be meaningful; or unclear (such as the indicator on door-to-brain CT: private facility CT? Public hospital neuroimaging service?).
Transforming servicesRoadmapAnnex 4 outlines a roadmap for transforming services for ACS and stroke over the next five years, starting with immediate priorities for the first year, medium-term priorities (1–3 years) and then longer-term priorities by five years. Annex 5 summarizes the roadmap in one page, and Annex 6 contains infographics to overview the roadmap in pictorial format.
Roles and responsibilitiesThe list of stakeholders for agreeing and implementing the roadmap includes: the Ministry of Health; Mandatory Health Insurance Fund; regional and local health administrations; professional and scientific societies and academia; directors, managers and clinicians within public hospitals and health-care facilities; key opinion leaders in the cardiovascular and stroke field; health promotion and public health institutions; and patients, survivors and their families. Several of these are already represented within the CVD Working Group.
The system needs to be designed and implemented at the national, regional and local levels. National and subnational steering groups could comprise the Ministry of Health, the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund, the lead clinician, a hospital manager and public health and patient representatives. Clear lines of responsibility and accountability need to be designated.
MechanismsPolicy and regulations
The broader policy context has already been described. There seems to be a real opportunity to link this work with that for developing the emergency systems, the service delivery master plan, eHealth system, performance monitoring and
9
the quality systems, so that the health system response is comprehensive and aligned with Ministry of Health instructions, orders, government decrees and decisions of the Coordination Council on optimizing care in AMI and stroke.
Structural investment
Bilateral donors have invested considerably recently in building hospitals and health facilities; some are in the private sector such as the Hospital of Kyrgyz-Turkish Friendship in Bishkek. There are likely to be multiple opportunities for investment, including in digital health solutions, but these need to be coordinated to achieve optimal outcomes. This should also fit with the regional development policy.
Training of personnel
A group of local experts appointed by the Ministry of Health has produced new stroke and ACS guidelines, and disseminating and implementing these is also part of this roadmap. Medical education reforms are underway. A Swiss-funded project produces distance-learning courses. Extending the use of telemedicine facilities is also a possibility. The CVD Working Group made the following suggestions: regular conferences presenting the results of work; educational programmes for postgraduate education, including distance and residential education; internships; international exchange programmes; participation in international projects – registries, clinical research and trials; advanced training (and education in the workplace) according to specialty, including for nurses; preparing emergency specialists and training specialties that are needed but absent such as neurorehabilitation physician, speech therapist and occupational therapist.
Materials that may need to be developed are: extension of the national clinical practice guidelines; clinical protocols on ACS and stroke for nurses (such as FeSS); pocket books and billboards with stroke and ACS protocols, clinical scales such as NIHSS, Rankin scale, CHADSVASC etc.; a pocket book for emergency ambulances; and a module for drivers, dispatchers and ambulances. The action plan for emergency services already includes suggestions regarding training for emergency ambulance crews and dispatchers.
Health-care funding
A comprehensive and aligned health system response also needs to ensure that system enablers are in place to facilitate this change. Health-care funding is a critical part of this and needs to consider how domestic funding can start to broaden the benefit package and coverage.
Next stepsThis roadmap has been presented to the Ministry of Health and widely consulted with national and regional partners, including the medical profession. The document is intended to inform the Ministry of Health in taking the next steps in developing its own roadmap for improving services.
Important information in coming months will be the results of an exercise to test the feasibility of collecting the proposed indicators and costing of all the recommendations (one-time investment and concurrent costs). The analysis should also feed into the State Guaranteed Benefit Package discussion in the coming months.
References
1. Farrington J, Pezzella FR, Yakovlev A, Rotar O. Review of acute care and rehabilitation services for heart attack and stroke in Kyrgyzstan. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2017 (http://www.euro.who.int/en/countries/kyrgyzstan/publications/review-of-acute-care-and-rehabilitation-services-for-heart-attack-and-stroke-in-kyrgyzstan-2017, accessed 14 November 2018).
2. Beishenkulov MT, Toktosunova AK. Clinical protocol on acute coronary syndrome with ST elevation. Bishkek: Ministry of Health, Kyrgyzstan; 2017.
10
3. Toktomushev C, Turgunbaev DD, Kaliev OC et al. Management of patients with acute disturbance of cerebral circulation. Clinical guidelines for prehospital care. Bishkek: Ministry of Health, Kyrgyzstan; 2017.
4. Toimatov SS, Omorov NK, Turgunbaev DD, Smith B. Ischemic stroke and transient attack. Clinical guidelines for hospital care. Bishkek: Ministry of Health, Kyrgyzstan; 2017.
5. Tackling NCDs. “Best buys” and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (http://www.who.int/ncds/management/best-buys/en, accessed 14 November 2018).
6. Evidence-based treatment protocols. HEARTS technical package for cardiovascular disease management in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260421/WHO-NMH-NVI-18.2-eng.pdf;jsessionid=8FB9FEC6E61A12277C75CE8F8D6D7595?sequence=1, accessed 14 November 2018).
7. WHO essential medicines list. 20th edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en, accessed 14 November 2018).
8. Clinical practice guidelines. Sophia Antipolis, France: European Society of Cardiology; 2018 (https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines, accessed 14 November 2018).
9. ESO Guideline Directory. Basle: European Stroke Organisation; 2018 (https://eso-stroke.org/eso-guideline-directory, accessed 14 November 2018).
10. Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W, Howie K. Do stroke units save lives? Lancet. 1993;342:395–8.11. Kim CH, Jeon JP, Kim SE, Choi HJ, Cho YJ. Endovascular treatment with intravenous thrombolysis versus endovascular
treatment alone for acute anterior circulation stroke: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018;61:467–73.
12. Ganesh A, Lindsay P, Fang J, Kapral MK, Côté R, Joiner I et al. Integrated systems of stroke care and reduction in 30-day mortality: a retrospective analysis. Neurology. 2016;86:898–904.
13. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:215–22.
14. Middleton S, McElduff P, Ward J, Grimshaw JM, Dale S, D’Este C et al. Implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols to manage fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in acute stroke (QASC): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1699–1706.
15. Guidelines 2008. Basle: European Stroke Organisation; 2008 (https://eso-stroke.org/eso-guideline-directory, accessed 14 November 2018).
16. European Stroke Organization guideline on glycaemia management in acute stroke. Basle: European Stroke Organisation; 2017 (https://eso-stroke.org/eso-guideline-directory, accessed 14 November 2018).
17. Teasell R, Foley N, Hussein N, Cotoi A. The efficacy of stroke rehabilitation. In: Teasell R, Cotoi A, Chow J, Wiener J, Iliescu A, Hussein N, Salter K. The stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review. 18th edition. Toronto: Canadian Stroke Network; 2018 (http://www.ebrsr.com, accessed 14 November 2018).
18. Mendis S. Stroke disability and rehabilitation of stroke: World Health Organization perspective. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:3–4.19. Heikkilä I, Kuusisto H, Stolberg A, Palomäki A. Stroke thrombolysis given by emergency physicians cuts in-hospital delays
significantly immediately after implementing a new treatment protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:46.20. Ryynänen OP, Iirola T, Reitala J, Pälve H, Malmivaara A. Is advanced life support better than basic life support in
prehospital care? A systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:62.21. Sanghavi P, Jena AB, Newhouse JP, Zaslavsky AM. Outcomes of basic versus advanced life support for out-of-hospital
medical emergencies. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:681–90.22. Ebinger M, Kunz A, Wendt M, Rozanski M, Winter B, Waldschmidt C et al. Effects of golden hour thrombolysis: a
Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Care in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) substudy. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:25–30.
23. Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M, Weber JE, Waldschmidt C, Rozanski M et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1622–31.
24. Bowry R, Grotta JC. Bringing emergency neurology to ambulances: mobile stroke unit. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;38:713–7.
25. Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen KR, Bollweg K, Kronborg C, Ebinger M, Audebert HJ. Cost–effectiveness estimate of prehospital thrombolysis: results of the PHANTOM-S study. Neurology. 2015;84:1090–7.
11
26. Dietrich M, Walter S, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Helwig S, Levine S, Balucani C et al. Is prehospital treatment of acute stroke too expensive? An economic evaluation based on the first trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;38:457–63.
27. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947.
28. Moynihan B, Davis D, Pereira A, Cloud G, Markus HS. Delivering regional thrombolysis via a hub-and-spoke model. J R Soc Med. 2010;103:363–9.
29. The Stent Save a Life initiative (https://www.stentsavealife.com, accessed 14 November 2018). 30. Mehta S, Granger C, Grines CL, Jacobs A, Henry TD, Rokos I et al. Confronting system barriers for ST-elevation MI in low
and middle income countries with a focus on India. Indian Heart J. 2017;70:185–90.31. El Khoury R, Jung R, Nanda A, Sila C, Abraham MG, Castonguay AC et al. Overview of key factors in improving access to
acute stroke care. Neurology. 2012;79(13 Suppl. 1):S26–34.
12
Annex 1. Members of the CVD Working GroupThe Working Group was established in June 2017 and had 16 meetings by March 2018.
N.S. Ibraeva: National Coordinator on Noncommunicable Diseases, Ministry of Health, Department of Management of Health Care and Drug Policy
A.S. Sarybaev: Senior Cardiologist, Ministry of Health, National Centre for Cardiology and Internal Medicine; Head, Department of High Altitude Medicine
V. Zventsova: Cardiologist and Scientific Secretary, National Centre for Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Department of AMI
Z. Chazymova: Senior Doctor of Urgent Cardiology, National Centre for Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Department of Urgent Cardiology
A.B. Dzhumanazarov: Deputy Director, Research Institute of Cardiac Surgery and Organ Transplantation
S.A. Makhmuthodjaev: consultant on CVD, Den Sooluk
G. Tumenbaeva, Senior Cardiologist, Emergency Ambulance Service of Bishkek
A.S. Artykbaev: Senior Neurologist, Ministry of Health, Head of Department, City Hospital No. 1
I.A. Sverdlova: Neurologist, Kyrgyz State Medical Institute of graduate education
N. Asanova: Neurologist, FMC No. 7 Post
B.B. Kulov: Head of Department, Scientific Institute of Rehabilitation
I. Luzenko: Assistant, Department of Neurology, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy
13
Annex 2. Recommendations for ambulances2.1. Equipment for ambulances
Table A2-1 shows the suggested core equipment for an ambulance providing prehospital basic life support that is relevant for ACS and stroke, in addition to any other standard basic life support equipment the ambulance contains for other conditions (see the section on model of care).
Table A2-1. Suggested equipment to be in all ambulances to support basic care of ACS and stroke
Availability requirements Equipment Current availability for ambulances
RequiredVentilation and airway equipment (suction apparatus; oxygen supply; manual resuscitator and mask)
No
Required Pulse oximetry monitor Yes
Required ECG recorder and monitor Yes
Required (in the absence of doctor)Recommended (when there is a team of doctors)
The device for transmitting ECG results (telemedicine)
Not in ambulancesYes, in some tertiary-level hospitals
Required External cardioverter (defibrillator) Yes
In addition to the basic equipment, an ambulance that provides more advanced life support for ACS would need additional equipment as shown in Table A2-2 (1).
Table A2-2. Suggested equipment to be in specialized ambulances providing more advanced care for ACS
Availability requirements Equipment Current availability for ambulances
Required (in the absence of doctor)Recommended (when there is a team of doctors)
The device for transmission of ECG (telemedicine)
Not in ambulancesYes, in some tertiary-level hospitals
Strongly recommended External electrocardiostimulator (pacemaker)
No
Recommended Invasive ventilation No
Recommended Portable ultrasound diagnostic device No
May be considered Chest compression device No
May be consideredPoint-of-care biomarker systems (troponin test)
No
Source: Beygui et al. (2). Key: the priorities are: (1) required; (2) strongly recommended; (3) recommended; and (4) may be considered.
2.2. Medicines for ambulances
These are the suggested core medicines for an ambulance with a doctor onboard that provide prehospital care (3) for ACS and stroke (see the section on model of care). Kyrgyzstan’s prehospital clinical guidelines do not list any specific medicines, but these suggestions come from international evidence-informed guidelines and the WHO essential medicines list.
14
Table A2-3. Suggested medicines for ambulances providing prehospital care for ACS and stroke in ambulances
Requirements Medicines for ACS and strokePresence in WHO essential medicines list
Presence in national formulary
Current availability for ambulances
Required
Morphine Yes Yes Yes
Furosemide Yes Yes Yes
Adrenaline Yes Yes Yes
Diazepam Yes Yes Yes
Strongly recommended
Amiodarone Yes Yes Yes
Atropine Yes Yes Yes
Blood pressure–lowering drugsBisoprololAmlodipineEnalapril
BisoprololAmlodipineEnalapril
Yes
Recommended
Nitroglycerin Yes Yes Yes
Lidocaine Yes Yes Yes
Dobutamine Yes Yes Yes
Magnesium sulfate Yes Yes Yes
As described in the section on model of care, a specialized ambulance for ACS would be able to perform thrombolysis. Table A2-4 lists the additional medicines that would be needed.
Table A2-4. Additional medicines needed for performing thrombolysis
Medicines to support prehospital thrombolysis
Presence in WHO essential medicines list
Presence in nationalFormulary
Current availability for ambulances
Alteplasea No No No
Unfractionated heparins and/or enoxaparin
Yes Yes Not
Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) Yes Yes Yes
Clopidogrel Yes Yes Yes
Beta-blockers YesBisoprololCarvediolMetoprolol
Yes
Source: Beygui et al. (2). aStreptokinase is currently available in hospitals but not ambulances. Currently, only streptokinase is available, this drug is not recommended by international guidelines anymore. Within international guidelines (2), alteplase may be considered and tenecteplase is recommended but the latter is not in the WHO essential medicines list.
References
1. WHO essential medicines list. 20th edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en, accessed 14 November 2018).
2. Beygui F, Castren M, Brunetti ND, Rosell-Ortiz F, Christ M, Zeymer U et al. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 DOI: 10.1177/2048872615604119
3. Equipment for ambulances: ACEP policy statement. Irving (TX): American College of Emergency Physicians and Medical Direction of Emergency Medical Services; 2018 (http://www.acep.org, accessed 14 November 2018).
15
Ann
ex 3
. Sta
ndar
ds a
nd p
erfo
rman
ce in
dica
tors
3.1.
Pre
hosp
ital
car
e: a
cute
cor
onar
y sy
ndro
me
(ACS
)
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l (ho
spit
al,
regi
onal
or
nati
onal
)
Avai
labi
lity
of b
asic
leve
l of c
are
at th
e pr
ehos
pita
l sta
ge: c
ardi
opul
mon
ary
resu
scita
tion,
defi
brill
ation
, ana
lges
ics,
an
tithr
ombo
tic d
rugs
(hep
arin
, an
tipla
tele
ts),
diur
etics
, cat
echo
lam
ines
(1)
1 ye
ar
• %
of a
mbu
lanc
e te
ams
equi
pped
with
ECG
m
achi
ne, d
efibr
illat
or a
nd s
et o
f med
icati
ons
• %
of a
mbu
lanc
e te
ams
certi
fied
in b
asic
and
ad
vanc
ed li
fe s
uppo
rt
• %
of r
esus
cita
tion
case
s su
cces
sful
ly
resu
scita
ted
• %
of a
mbu
lanc
es e
quip
ped
with
bot
h EC
G
and
defib
rilla
tor (
ambu
lanc
es e
quip
ped
with
de
fibril
lato
r/al
l am
bula
nces
tim
es 1
00)
• %
of n
eed
cove
red
(act
ual n
umbe
r of
avai
labl
e de
vice
s/to
tal d
evic
es n
eede
d to
co
ver t
he p
opul
ation
tim
es 1
00)
Plan
for d
evel
opin
g em
erge
ncy
care
Ambu
lanc
e an
nual
repo
rts
Trai
ning
pro
gram
mes
Ambu
lanc
e st
aff c
ertifi
catio
n pr
ogra
mm
e
Regi
onal
Patie
nts
with
sus
pect
ed A
CS re
quiri
ng
ambu
lanc
e in
terv
entio
n sh
ould
rece
ive
it as
so
on a
s po
ssib
le (i
deal
ly w
ithin
20
min
utes
) fr
om c
allin
g, E
CG s
houl
d be
regi
ster
ed
with
in th
e ne
xt 1
0 m
inut
es a
fter
clin
ical
as
sess
men
t and
, if i
ndic
ated
, pati
ents
sh
ould
rece
ive
antit
hrom
boly
tic d
rugs
in
the
preh
ospi
tal s
etting
if a
vaila
ble
1–3
year
s
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS re
ceiv
ing
ambu
lanc
e he
lp w
ithin
20
min
utes
from
cal
ling
(ACS
pa
tient
s re
ceiv
ing
ambu
lanc
e he
lp w
ithin
20
min
utes
/all
ACS
patie
nts
calli
ng a
mbu
lanc
e tim
es 1
00)
• %
of p
atien
ts re
ceiv
ing
EKG
in a
pre
hosp
ital
setti
ng (a
ll pa
tient
s re
ceiv
ing
EKG
in
preh
ospi
tal s
etting
s/al
l pati
ents
with
clin
ical
ly
diag
nose
d AC
S tim
es 1
00)
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS re
ceiv
ing
thro
mbo
lysi
s in
a p
reho
spita
l setti
nga (p
atien
ts re
ceiv
ing
thro
mbo
lysi
s/al
l pati
ents
with
clin
ical
di
agno
sis
of A
CS ti
mes
100
)b
Ambu
lanc
e re
gist
ry a
nd A
CS re
gist
ry
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
thro
mbo
lytic
dru
gs
• EK
G a
nd d
efibr
illat
or a
vaila
bilit
y
• Ch
eckl
ist a
nd A
CS p
reho
spita
l tr
eatm
ent p
roto
col
• Am
bula
nce
pers
onne
l tra
inin
g
Regi
onal
and
na
tiona
l
16
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l (ho
spit
al,
regi
onal
or
nati
onal
)
The
preh
ospi
tal c
are
of p
eopl
e w
ith
susp
ecte
d AC
S sh
ould
incl
ude
an A
CS p
re-
aler
t by
ambu
lanc
e cr
ews
to th
e re
ceiv
ing
emer
genc
y de
part
men
t or i
nten
sive
car
e un
it if
the
patie
nt is
ECG
pos
itive
or A
CS is
su
spec
ted
to e
xped
ite s
peci
alis
t ass
essm
ent
and
trea
tmen
t. T
hese
pati
ents
sho
uld
be
hosp
italiz
ed d
irect
ly in
an
inte
nsiv
e ca
re
unit
1–3
year
s
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith p
reho
spita
l sus
pect
ed A
CS
(EKG
don
e) h
ospi
taliz
ed d
irect
ly to
inte
nsiv
e ca
re u
nit/
all A
CS p
atien
ts a
dmitt
ed to
hos
pita
l tim
es 1
00)
Prot
ocol
of r
egio
nal c
oord
inati
on o
f AC
S ca
reAm
bula
nce
conn
ectio
n w
ith h
ospi
tal
(dire
ct c
all o
r cal
l thr
ough
am
bula
nce
disp
atch
er)
Preh
ospi
tal A
CS p
roto
col a
nd c
heck
list
Ambu
lanc
e an
d em
erge
ncy
serv
ices
tr
aini
ngAm
bula
nce
regi
stry
and
ACS
or
hosp
ital r
egis
try
Hos
pita
l
Defi
brill
ation
at t
he p
reho
spita
l sta
ge; E
CG
at th
e pr
ehos
pita
l sta
ge s
houl
d be
ava
ilabl
e1–
3 ye
ars
• %
of a
mbu
lanc
es e
quip
ped
with
bot
h EC
G
and
defib
rilla
tor (
ambu
lanc
es e
quip
ped
with
de
fibril
lato
r/al
l am
bula
nces
tim
es 1
00)
• %
of n
eed
cove
red
(act
ual n
umbe
r of
avai
labl
e de
vice
s/to
tal d
evic
es n
eede
d to
co
ver t
he p
opul
ation
tim
es 1
00)
Regi
onal
Tele
-ECG
sho
uld
be a
vaila
ble,
esp
ecia
lly in
ru
ral a
reas
whe
re p
rimar
y PC
I rep
erfu
sion
is
not
reac
habl
e 1–
3 ye
ars
• %
of a
mbu
lanc
e no
n-ph
ysic
ian
team
s eq
uipp
ed w
ith te
le-E
CG
• N
umbe
r of t
ele-
ECG
con
sulta
tions
• N
umbe
r of ti
mes
thro
mbo
lysi
s pe
rfor
med
in
preh
ospi
tal s
etting
s
Esta
blis
hmen
t of t
ele-
ECG
in re
gion
sAm
bula
nce
and
emer
genc
y se
rvic
es
trai
ning
Regi
onal
or
hosp
ital
a Th
is in
dica
tor i
s es
peci
ally
use
ful i
n ru
ral a
reas
.b Pr
ehos
pita
l thr
ombo
lysi
s is
esp
ecia
lly im
port
ant i
n ru
ral a
reas
and
has
a w
ell-p
rove
n eff
ect i
n re
duci
ng m
orta
lity
and
disa
bilit
y. It
requ
ires
ECG
and
defi
brill
ator
ava
ilabi
lity
and
wel
l-tra
ined
am
bula
nce
pers
onne
l, up
date
d pr
otoc
ol a
nd c
heck
list.
All
this
may
be
allo
cate
d in
to o
ne s
tand
ard
defin
ed a
s “a
vaila
bilit
y of
str
oke
thro
mbo
lysi
s fo
r sel
ecte
d pa
tient
s” m
easu
red
with
the
abso
lute
num
ber o
f tim
es p
reho
spita
l thr
ombo
lysi
s w
as p
erfo
rmed
pe
r reg
ion
and
the
perc
enta
ge o
f act
ual t
hrom
boly
sis
proc
edur
es/p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS a
dmitt
ed to
hos
pita
l tim
es 1
00.
3.1.
Pre
hosp
ital
car
e: a
cute
cor
onar
y sy
ndro
me
(ACS
) con
tinu
ed
17
3.2.
Pre
hosp
ital
car
e: s
trok
e
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l
A pe
rson
with
sus
pect
ed s
trok
e or
TIA
sh
ould
be
imm
edia
tely
ass
esse
d at
firs
t co
ntac
t usi
ng a
val
idat
ed s
trok
e sc
reen
ing
tool
, suc
h as
the
FAST
(fac
e, a
rm, s
peec
h an
d tim
e) te
st (2
)
1–3
year
s
• %
of s
trok
e pa
tient
s re
ceiv
ing
a te
leph
one
asse
ssm
ent f
or s
uspe
cted
str
oke
(num
ber o
f pa
tient
s re
ceiv
ing
a te
leph
one
asse
ssm
ent f
or
susp
ecte
d st
roke
/str
oke
patie
nts
adm
itted
to
hosp
ital ti
mes
100
)
FAST
am
bula
nce
trai
ning
Ambu
lanc
e re
gist
ryRe
gion
al s
trok
e re
gist
rya
Regi
onal
or
na
tiona
l
Tran
spor
t to
hosp
ital w
ith a
cute
spe
cial
ist
stro
ke s
ervi
ces
shou
ld b
e ac
hiev
ed a
s qu
ickl
y as
pos
sibl
e an
d al
way
s w
ithin
a
max
imum
of o
ne h
our f
rom
am
bula
nce
aler
t (3)
1–3
year
s
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith p
reho
spita
l sus
pect
ed s
trok
e re
achi
ng h
ospi
tal w
ithin
a m
axim
um o
f one
hou
r fr
om a
mbu
lanc
e (p
atien
ts re
achi
ng h
ospi
tal w
ithin
on
e ho
ur fr
om a
mbu
lanc
e al
ert/
all s
trok
e pa
tient
s ad
mitt
ed to
hos
pita
l tim
es 1
00)
Preh
ospi
tal s
trok
e pr
otoc
ol a
nd
chec
klis
tAm
bula
nce
and
emer
genc
y se
rvic
es
trai
ning
Ambu
lanc
e re
gist
ry a
nd s
trok
e an
d ho
spita
l reg
istr
y
Hos
pita
l or
re
gion
al
The
preh
ospi
tal c
are
of p
eopl
e w
ith
susp
ecte
d st
roke
sho
uld
incl
ude
a 15
-min
ute
pre-
aler
t by
ambu
lanc
e cr
ews
to th
e re
ceiv
ing
emer
genc
y de
part
men
t or
str
oke
unit
whe
re th
e pa
tient
is F
AST
posi
tive
or s
trok
e is
sus
pect
ed to
exp
edite
sp
ecia
list a
sses
smen
t and
trea
tmen
t (2)
1–3
year
s
• %
of s
trok
e pa
tient
s ad
mitt
ed to
hos
pita
l with
a
stro
ke p
re-a
lert
(str
oke
patie
nts
adm
itted
to h
ospi
tal
with
a 1
5-m
inut
e st
roke
pre
-ale
rt/a
ll st
roke
pati
ents
ad
mitt
ed to
hos
pita
l tim
es 1
00)
• Ti
min
g to
adm
issi
on to
hos
pita
l of s
trok
e pa
tient
s
–Ti
min
g to
adm
issi
on to
hos
pita
l of s
trok
e pa
tient
s w
ith p
re-a
lert
str
oke
code
–Ti
min
g to
adm
issi
on to
hos
pita
l of s
trok
e pa
tient
s w
ithou
t pre
-ale
rt s
trok
e co
de
Pre-
aler
t str
oke
prot
ocol
Ambu
lanc
e an
d em
erge
ncy
phys
icia
n an
d ne
urol
ogis
t tra
inin
g
Stro
ke a
nd a
mbu
lanc
e re
gist
ry
Pre-
notifi
catio
n pr
otoc
ol
diss
emin
ation
Ambu
lanc
e tr
aini
ng o
n pr
e-no
tifica
tion
prot
ocol
Regi
onal
a This
is a
lread
y in
pla
ce in
Bis
hkek
but
nee
ds to
be
rede
sign
ed in
a u
ser-
frie
ndly
and
mor
e m
eani
ngfu
l way
.
18
3.3.
Hos
pita
l acu
te c
are:
ACS
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l
Avai
labi
lity
of P
CI, i
nten
sive
car
e un
it se
rvic
e, m
onito
red
beds
24/
7/36
53–
5 ye
ars
(?)
• N
umbe
r of S
TEM
I pati
ents
trea
ted
with
PCI
–Pr
imar
y PC
I
–PC
I aft
er th
rom
boly
sis
• ST
EMI p
atien
ts: %
of S
TEM
I pati
ents
rece
ivin
g re
perf
usio
n in
the
first
12
hour
s fr
om s
ympt
om
onse
ta
• N
on-S
TEM
I pati
ents
: % o
f pati
ents
with
med
ium
, hi
gh a
nd v
ery
high
risk
of N
STEM
I und
ergo
ing
coro
nary
ang
iogr
aphy
dur
ing
hosp
ital s
tay
Inte
nsiv
e ca
re u
nit a
nd c
athe
teriz
ation
la
bora
tory
ava
ilabi
lity
in s
trat
egic
cen
tres
Staff
(car
diol
ogis
t, n
urse
, tec
hnic
ian)
tr
aini
ngQ
ualit
y m
onito
ring,
loca
l ACS
regi
stry
and
ca
se re
view
Hos
pita
l an
d re
gion
al
Avai
labi
lity
of la
bora
tory
dia
gnos
tic fa
ciliti
es
(pre
fera
bly
high
-sen
sitiv
ity tr
opon
in o
ver
quan
tity
stan
dard
trop
onin
or M
B-CK
)
% o
f pati
ents
with
sus
pect
ed A
CS w
ith tr
opon
in te
st
perf
orm
ed a
t adm
issi
onH
ospi
tal A
CS re
gist
ryIn
sura
nce
com
pany
aud
it
All p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS o
f int
erm
edia
te a
nd
high
risk
, esp
ecia
lly w
ith c
ompl
icati
ons,
sh
ould
be
adm
itted
to th
e in
tens
ive
care
un
it an
d tr
eate
d on
a m
onito
red
bed
until
st
abili
zatio
n
1–3
year
s
In-h
ospi
tal m
orta
lity
for a
cute
myo
card
ial i
nfar
ction
Rate
s of
dea
th w
ithin
30
days
follo
win
g ho
spita
l ad
mis
sion
s fo
r acu
te m
yoca
rdia
l inf
arcti
on
Esta
blis
hmen
t of i
nten
sive
car
e un
itD
efini
ng a
nd im
plem
entin
g AC
S cl
inic
al
path
way
sAu
ditin
g re
gion
al in
sura
nce
com
pany
Staff
trai
ning
, sta
ndar
diza
tion
of
prot
ocol
s an
d ch
eckl
ist i
n th
e co
untr
y,
upda
te o
f ava
ilabl
e dr
ugs
(incl
udin
g st
atins
, bet
a-bl
ocke
rs a
nd a
nti-
thro
mbo
tic th
erap
y)
Nati
onal
, re
gion
al
and
hosp
ital
Com
preh
ensi
ve c
ardi
ovas
cula
rsu
rger
y (c
oron
ary
arte
ryby
pass
gra
ft s
urge
ry; s
urgi
cal
man
agem
ent o
f acu
te d
isor
der o
f the
ao
rta,
val
ves
and
any
othe
r car
diov
ascu
lar
stru
ctur
e) s
houl
d be
ava
ilabl
e in
sel
ecte
d ca
sesb
3–5
year
s
Card
iac
surg
ery
cons
ulta
tions
ava
ilabi
lity:
• N
umbe
r of c
onsu
ltatio
ns
• N
umbe
r of c
ardi
ac s
urge
ry o
pera
tions
per
form
ed
durin
g ho
spita
l adm
issi
onc
Tech
nica
l and
edu
catio
nal u
pdat
e of
sta
ff
and
stru
ctur
es
Nati
onal
, re
gion
al
and
hosp
ital
19
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l
Avai
labi
lity
of e
choc
ardi
ogra
phy
for
all p
atien
ts d
urin
g ho
spita
lizati
on (i
n co
mpl
icat
ed c
ases
, with
in th
e fir
st 2
4 ho
urs)
3–5
year
s%
of p
atien
ts w
ith a
sses
sed
LVEF
and
oth
er e
cho
para
met
ers
durin
g ho
spita
lizati
onH
ospi
tal A
CS re
gist
ryIn
sura
nce
com
pany
aud
it
All A
CS p
atien
ts w
ithou
t con
trai
ndic
ation
s sh
ould
be
trea
ted
with
dua
l anti
plat
elet
th
erap
y, A
CE in
hibi
tors
, bet
a-bl
ocke
rs a
nd
high
-dos
e st
atin
1 ye
ar%
of e
ligib
le p
atien
ts re
ceiv
ing
requ
ired
med
icati
ons
Hos
pita
l ACS
regi
stry
Insu
ranc
e co
mpa
ny a
udit
a Re
perf
usio
n co
uld
be P
CI o
r thr
ombo
lytic
ther
apy.
b Th
is p
oint
is v
ery
gene
ral b
ut a
n im
port
ant c
onsi
dera
tion
for t
he fu
ture
vis
ion
and
deve
lopm
ent o
f ser
vice
s.c To
be
defin
ed.
3.3.
Hos
pita
l acu
te c
are:
ACS
con
tinu
ed
20
3.4.
Hos
pita
l acu
te c
are:
str
oke
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l
All p
atien
ts w
ith s
uspe
cted
str
oke
shou
ld
have
imm
edia
te a
cces
s to
CT
scan
ning
if
requ
ired
to p
lan
urge
nt tr
eatm
ent.
All
othe
r pati
ents
with
sus
pect
ed s
trok
e to
be
scan
ned
with
in 1
2 ho
urs
of p
rese
ntati
ona (1
)
1-3
year
s (?
)
• D
oor-
to-C
T sc
an ti
min
g
• %
of b
rain
imag
ing
by C
T in
eve
ry s
uspe
cted
st
roke
whe
re C
T sc
anni
ng is
ava
ilabl
e
• %
of a
cute
str
oke
patie
nts
reac
hing
hos
pita
l w
ithin
4.5
hou
rs fr
om s
ympt
om o
nset
rece
ivin
g br
ain
CT s
cann
ing
with
in 3
0 m
inut
es fr
om
adm
issi
on (p
atien
ts re
achi
ng h
ospi
tal w
ithin
4.5
ho
urs
from
sym
ptom
ons
et u
nder
goin
g CT
with
in
30 m
inut
es fr
om a
dmis
sion
/pati
ents
reac
hing
ho
spita
l with
in 4
.5 h
ours
from
sym
ptom
ons
et
unde
rgoi
ng C
T aft
er 3
0 m
inut
es fr
om a
dmis
sion
tim
es 1
00)
• %
of a
cute
str
oke
patie
nts
unde
rgoi
ng C
T sc
anni
ng w
ithin
12
hour
s fr
om a
dmis
sion
(acu
te
stro
ke p
atien
ts u
nder
goin
g CT
sca
n w
ithin
12
hour
s fr
om a
dmis
sion
/all
adm
itted
str
oke
patie
nts
times
100
)
CT s
can
esta
blis
hmen
t pro
gram
me
in
publ
ic h
ospi
tal
Emer
genc
y an
d st
roke
regi
stry
Hos
pita
l an
d re
gion
al
Alte
plas
e sh
ould
onl
y be
del
iver
ed b
y sp
ecia
list p
erso
nnel
em
bedd
ed w
ithin
a
hype
racu
te s
trok
e se
rvic
e w
ho a
re tr
aine
d an
d ex
perie
nced
in p
rovi
ding
str
oke
thro
mbo
lysi
s an
d re
cogn
izin
g co
mpl
icati
ons.
Th
e ea
rlier
the
thro
mbo
lytic
trea
tmen
t is
del
iver
ed, t
he b
etter
the
outc
ome,
pa
rticu
larly
if d
eliv
ered
with
in 9
0 m
inut
es
of s
ympt
om o
nset
. The
lice
nce
supp
orts
th
e us
e of
alte
plas
e up
to 4
.5 h
ours
. O
nce
IV th
rom
boly
sis
is a
vaila
ble
in th
e ce
ntre
, do
or-t
o-ne
edle
tim
e fo
r tho
se a
ppro
pria
te
for i
n-lic
ence
use
of I
V th
rom
boly
sis
as s
oon
as p
ossi
ble
<60
min
utes
(3,4
)
3–5
year
s
• Ab
solu
te n
umbe
r of t
hrom
boly
sis
proc
edur
es
perf
orm
ed
• D
oor-
to-n
eedl
e tim
e
• %
of e
ligib
le p
atien
ts re
ceiv
ing
intr
aven
ous
thro
mbo
lytic
ther
apy
• %
of e
ligib
le p
atien
ts re
ceiv
ing
intr
aven
ous
thro
mbo
lytic
ther
apy
with
in 6
0 m
inut
es fr
om
hosp
ital a
dmis
sion
Acut
e st
roke
pro
toco
lAl
tepl
ase
avai
labi
lity
Emer
genc
y, a
mbu
lanc
e an
d ne
urol
ogy
staff
trai
ning
Hos
pita
l an
d re
gion
al
21
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l
Stro
ke p
atien
ts s
houl
d be
man
aged
in a
st
roke
uni
t unl
ess
othe
r con
ditio
ns re
quiri
ng
imm
edia
te s
peci
alis
t car
e do
min
ate.
Str
oke
patie
nts
are
man
aged
by
a m
ultip
rofe
ssio
nal
team
and
rece
ive
a m
ultip
rofe
ssio
nal
eval
uatio
n w
ithin
24
hour
s fr
om s
trok
e un
it ad
mis
sion
(3)
1–3
year
s
• Ra
tes
of d
eath
with
in 3
0 da
ys fo
llow
ing
hosp
ital
adm
issi
ons
for i
scha
emic
str
oke
• Ra
tes
of d
eath
with
in 3
0 da
ys fo
llow
ing
hosp
ital
adm
issi
ons
for h
aem
orrh
agic
str
oke
• %
of a
ll pa
tient
s w
ith a
cute
str
oke
as th
e pr
edom
inan
t pat
holo
gy a
dmitt
ed to
the
hosp
ital
trea
ted
in th
e st
roke
uni
t (or
the
inte
nsiv
e ca
re
unit,
if a
ppro
pria
te)
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith a
fina
l dia
gnos
is o
f str
oke
with
a
docu
men
ted
phys
ioth
erap
y as
sess
men
t with
in
24–4
8 ho
urs
of a
dmis
sion
to h
ospi
tal
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith a
doc
umen
ted
swal
low
ing
eval
uatio
n w
ithin
24–
48 h
ours
of a
dmis
sion
to
hosp
ital
Stro
ke c
entr
es a
lread
y ex
ist;
impr
ovin
g st
roke
car
e in
exi
sting
str
oke
units
re
quire
s fo
ur ty
pes
of in
terv
entio
n:
• Q
ualit
y m
onito
ring
and
case
revi
ew
with
str
oke
team
(RES
-Q re
gist
ry
alre
ady
in p
lace
offe
rs a
mon
thly
re
port
)
• St
aff tr
aini
ng (s
peec
h th
erap
ist,
reha
bilit
ation
etc
.)
• Eq
uipm
ent (
sono
grap
hy,
mul
tipar
amet
ric m
onito
ring)
• Es
senti
al d
rugs
Nati
onal
, re
gion
al
and
hosp
ital
a This
sta
ndar
d de
pend
s on
the
avai
labi
lity
of C
T sc
anni
ng e
quip
men
t in
publ
ic h
ospi
tals
, whi
ch is
now
lack
ing.
The
impl
emen
tatio
n ph
ase
ther
efor
e al
so d
epen
ds o
n th
e te
chno
logi
cal i
nves
tmen
t pla
n an
d st
rate
gy. C
T sc
anni
ng is
re
quire
d to
pla
n th
e tr
eatm
ent o
f peo
ple
with
str
oke
and
to e
stab
lish
prog
nosi
s.
3.4.
Hos
pita
l acu
te c
are:
str
oke conti
nued
22
3.5.
Pos
t-ho
spit
al c
are:
ACS
and
str
oke
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l
Stro
ke: a
ll pa
tient
s w
ith s
trok
e sh
ould
hav
e ac
cess
to s
peci
aliz
ed n
euro
reha
bilit
ation
se
rvic
es a
nd to
a d
esig
nate
d st
roke
re
habi
litati
on p
rogr
amm
e in
a d
edic
ated
ap
prop
riate
setti
ng (r
ehab
ilita
tion
inpa
tient
uni
t,
nurs
ing
faci
lity,
day
ser
vice
, out
patie
nt c
linic
, ho
me
reha
bilit
ation
) acc
ordi
ng to
the
patie
nts’
ne
eds
and
reha
bilit
ation
pro
gnos
is (e
stab
lishe
d an
d st
anda
rdiz
ed b
y us
ing
stro
ke s
cale
s su
ch
as N
IHSS
, Ran
kin,
AD
L, IA
DL,
Bar
thel
Inde
x an
d M
obili
ty In
dex)
(3,4
)
1–3
year
sN
umbe
r of p
atien
ts re
ferr
ed to
spe
cial
ized
ne
uror
ehab
ilita
tion
serv
ices
at h
ospi
tal
disc
harg
ea
Stro
ke re
gist
rySt
roke
sca
les
Staff
trai
ning
Defi
nitio
n of
str
oke
reha
bilit
ation
in
terv
entio
ns a
void
ing
proc
edur
es
with
no
or p
oor e
vide
nce
Hos
pita
l an
d re
gion
al
Stro
ke: a
ll st
roke
pati
ents
sho
uld
rece
ive
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
revi
ew a
fter
6–1
2 m
onth
s (5
)1–
3 ye
ars
Dis
trib
ution
of d
isab
ility
sco
res
acro
ss th
e st
roke
po
pula
tion
usin
g th
e m
odifi
ed R
anki
n sc
ale
scor
e at
dis
char
ge fr
om a
cute
car
e an
d at
3, 6
and
12
mon
ths
after
str
okeb
ACS:
all
ACS
patie
nts
shou
ld b
e as
sess
ed fo
r el
igib
ility
, ref
erra
l, cl
inic
al a
sses
smen
t and
co
re d
eliv
ery
of c
ardi
ac re
habi
litati
on b
efor
e pr
ogre
ssin
g to
long
-ter
m m
anag
emen
t3–
5 ye
ars
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith m
yoca
rdia
l inf
arcti
on
refe
rred
to c
ardi
ac re
habi
litati
on
• ca
rdio
vasc
ular
mor
talit
y at
12
mon
ths
after
m
yoca
rdia
l inf
arcti
on
Adop
tion
of s
tand
ardi
zed
prot
ocol
s fo
r car
diac
reha
bilit
ation
Adop
tion
of a
ccre
dita
tion
crite
ria fo
r ca
rdia
c re
habi
litati
on c
entr
es
Hos
pita
l an
d re
gion
al
a Indi
vidu
al in
dica
tors
may
be
used
dep
endi
ng o
n th
e re
habi
litati
on s
etting
.b Th
is in
dica
tor c
an a
lso
be a
dded
to th
e ac
ute
care
tabl
e, to
str
ess
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f usi
ng c
linic
al s
cale
s in
eve
ryda
y pr
actic
e. C
linic
al s
cale
s th
at a
re e
ssen
tial f
or s
trok
e ar
e N
IHSS
, mod
ified
Ran
kin
scal
e an
d, fo
r reh
abili
tatio
n pu
rpos
es, B
arth
el In
dex
and
ADL
and
IAD
L.
23
3.6.
Pos
thos
pita
l car
e: s
econ
dary
pre
venti
on fo
r A
CS a
nd s
trok
e
Stan
dard
of c
are
Impl
emen
tati
on
phas
eIn
dica
tors
Impl
emen
tati
on to
ols
Leve
l
Stan
dard
sec
onda
ry p
reve
ntion
pre
scrip
tion
at d
isch
arge
acc
ordi
ng to
car
diov
ascu
lar a
cute
ev
ent:
ACS
, TIA
, isc
hem
ic s
trok
e (3
,4)
1–3
year
s
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS w
ithou
t con
trai
ndic
ation
s di
scha
rged
on
high
-dos
e st
atins
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS (w
ith L
VEF
40%
) di
scha
rged
on
beta
-blo
cker
s an
d AC
E in
hibi
tors
• %
with
ACS
, TIA
or s
trok
e on
anti
thro
mbo
tic
trea
tmen
t (ac
etyl
salic
ylic
aci
d, c
lopi
dogr
el o
r ac
etyl
salic
ylic
aci
d pl
us c
lopi
dogr
el if
indi
cate
d)
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith a
tria
l fibr
illati
on a
nd is
chae
mic
st
roke
or T
IA d
isch
arge
d on
anti
coag
ulan
ts
ACS
regi
stry
with
follo
w-u
p
Free
and
/or a
fford
able
med
icati
on fo
r se
cond
ary
prop
hyla
xis
(at l
east
one
ye
ar a
fter
ACS
and
str
oke
or T
IA)
Regi
onal
Com
orbi
dity
(dia
bete
s, o
verw
eigh
t, s
mok
ing)
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS, T
IA o
r str
oke
who
rece
ive
smok
ing-
cess
ation
cou
nsel
ling
• %
of p
atien
ts w
ith A
CS, T
IA o
r str
oke
who
rece
ive
lifes
tyle
(suc
h as
die
tary
mod
ifica
tion)
cou
nsel
ling
Regi
onal
an
d na
tiona
l
Hea
lth b
ehav
iour
con
sulta
tion,
pati
ent
educ
ation
and
med
icati
on a
dher
ence
pr
ogra
mm
es3–
5 ye
ars
• %
of p
atien
ts o
n di
spen
sary
obs
erva
tion
• %
of e
ligib
le p
atien
ts p
artic
ipati
ng in
free
-of-
char
ge m
edic
ation
sup
plem
enta
tion
or c
o-pa
ymen
t pro
gram
mes
Polic
y of
dis
pens
ary
obse
rvati
onPo
licy
of fr
ee-o
f-ch
arge
med
icati
on
supp
ly
Refe
renc
es
1.
Beyg
ui F
, Cas
tren
M, B
rune
tti N
D, R
osel
l-Orti
z F,
Chr
ist M
, Zey
mer
U e
t al.
Eur H
eart
J Ac
ute
Card
iova
sc C
are.
201
5 D
OI:
10.1
177/
2048
8726
1560
4119
2.
Om
orov
NK,
Tur
gunb
aev
DD
. [Cl
inic
al re
com
men
datio
ns o
n pa
tient
s’ m
anag
emen
t with
isch
aem
ic s
trok
e an
d tr
ansi
ent i
scha
emic
att
acks
at t
he h
ospi
tal s
tage
.] Bi
shke
k: M
inis
try
of H
ealth
, Kyr
gyzs
tan;
201
7.3.
St
roke
ser
vice
sta
ndar
ds. L
ondo
n: B
ritish
Ass
ocia
tion
of S
trok
e Ph
ysic
ians
; 201
4 (h
ttps
://b
asp.
ac.u
k, a
cces
sed
14 N
ovem
ber 2
018)
.4.
G
uide
lines
200
8. B
asle
: Eur
opea
n St
roke
Org
anis
ation
; 200
8 (h
ttps
://e
so-s
trok
e.or
g/es
o-gu
idel
ine-
dire
ctor
y, a
cces
sed
14 N
ovem
ber 2
018)
.5.
Ki
ng’s
Colle
ge L
ondo
n. T
he b
urde
n of
str
oke
in E
urop
e. B
russ
els:
Str
oke
Allia
nce
for E
urop
e; 2
017.
24
Ann
ex 4
. Prio
rities
for i
nter
venti
ons
4.1.
Pri
oriti
es fo
r 20
18 o
r th
e fir
st 1
2 m
onth
s w
ith
exis
ting
or
limit
ed re
sour
ces
Stro
keA
CS
Syst
em is
sues
• Em
erge
ncy
depa
rtm
ent n
etw
ork
and
mas
ter p
lan
• Cr
eate
team
s (M
inis
try
of H
ealth
, Man
dato
ry H
ealth
Insu
ranc
e Fu
nd, e
Hea
lth, l
ead
card
iolo
gist
s an
d st
roke
clin
icia
ns, p
rovi
ders
) at t
he n
ation
al a
nd
subn
ation
al le
vels
resp
onsi
ble
for i
mpl
emen
ting
the
road
map
, mon
itorin
g st
anda
rds
of c
are
and
achi
evin
g in
dica
tors
• D
isse
min
ate
the
new
nati
onal
clin
ical
gui
delin
es fo
r ACS
and
str
oke
and
trai
n an
d su
ppor
t clin
icia
ns to
use
them
with
the
supp
ort o
f tel
emed
icin
e fa
ciliti
es
• Ag
ree
on in
dica
tors
to b
e us
ed fo
r mon
itorin
g th
e qu
ality
of A
CS a
nd s
trok
e ca
re a
nd th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f pro
vide
rs
Preh
ospi
tal c
are
• Ra
ise
awar
enes
s am
ong
the
gene
ral p
ublic
of t
he s
igns
and
sym
ptom
s of
str
oke
and
ACS
and
an a
ppro
pria
te a
nd ti
mel
y re
spon
se
• Tr
ain
prim
ary
heal
th c
are
doct
ors,
nur
ses
and
feld
sher
s on
the
sign
s an
d sy
mpt
oms
of s
trok
e an
d AC
S an
d th
e ap
prop
riate
an
d tim
ely
resp
onse
• Ro
ll ou
t tel
e-EC
G, e
quip
ping
prim
ary
heal
th c
are
wor
kers
and
sup
porti
ng th
roug
h te
lem
edic
ine
• Eq
uip
ambu
lanc
es w
ith th
e m
ost e
ssen
tial e
quip
men
t and
dru
gs fo
r ACS
and
str
oke
• Tr
ain
ambu
lanc
e cr
ews
to re
cogn
ize
stro
ke s
igns
usi
ng F
AST
mne
mon
ic a
nd in
imm
edia
te c
are
• Tr
ain
ambu
lanc
e cr
ews
to re
cogn
ize
STEM
I and
N
STEM
I and
in im
med
iate
car
e
Hos
pita
l car
e
• D
eliv
er a
hos
pita
l mas
ter p
lan
that
incl
udes
the
desi
gn o
f ser
vice
s fo
r ACS
and
str
oke
with
a h
ub-a
nd-s
poke
mod
el e
mbe
dded
in th
e em
erge
ncy
netw
ork
• D
evel
op a
cute
car
e ne
twor
ks fo
r str
oke
and
ACS
usin
g ex
istin
g re
sour
ces
and
scal
e up
• Re
view
tele
med
icin
e an
d eH
ealth
opp
ortu
nitie
s –
desi
gn a
sys
tem
to fa
cilit
ate
acce
ss to
phy
sici
ans
with
acu
te s
trok
e an
d AC
S ex
perti
se a
nd to
sup
port
the
inte
rpre
tatio
n of
dia
gnos
tic te
sts
and
imag
ing
• In
crea
se a
cces
s to
ang
iogr
aphy
by
impr
ovin
g th
e us
e of
exi
sting
reso
urce
s an
d/or
com
mis
sion
ing
prov
isio
n
• Re
view
the
list o
f ess
entia
ls d
rugs
for A
CS a
nd s
trok
e an
d ca
rdio
vasc
ular
and
cer
ebro
vasc
ular
pre
venti
on
• St
art i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
str
oke
(RES
-Q) a
nd A
CS re
gist
ry
• St
art t
o or
gani
ze s
trok
e ne
twor
ks
• O
rgan
ize
mul
tidis
cipl
inar
y st
roke
team
s
• Re
view
neu
rosu
rger
y se
rvic
e an
d pr
otoc
ols
for h
aem
orrh
agic
str
oke
and
suba
rach
noid
ha
emor
rhag
e
• Tr
ain
nurs
es to
use
feve
r, su
gar a
nd s
wal
low
ing
prot
ocol
and
in n
utriti
on a
sses
smen
t, s
cale
-up
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
r per
form
ance
• Tr
ain
emer
genc
y an
d ne
urol
ogy
phys
icia
ns a
nd n
urse
s to
use
clin
ical
sca
les
and
scor
es:
NIH
SS, m
odifi
ed R
anki
n sc
ale,
Bar
thel
Inde
x, A
DL,
IAD
L, s
cale
up
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
r pe
rfor
man
ce
• In
crea
se a
cces
s to
imm
edia
te C
T sc
ans
by im
prov
ing
the
use
of e
xisti
ng re
sour
ces
and/
or
com
mis
sion
ing
prov
isio
n
• St
art t
o or
gani
ze A
CS n
etw
orks
• Pi
lot a
udit
of A
MI u
sing
indi
cato
rs
• Tr
ain
card
iolo
gist
s an
d nu
rses
to u
se s
cale
s an
d sc
ores
: mod
ified
Ran
kin
scal
e, A
DL,
IAD
L
25
Stro
keA
CS
Post
hosp
ital c
are
• Ed
ucati
on, s
kills
trai
ning
and
invo
lvem
ent i
n ca
re p
lann
ing
for s
trok
e su
rviv
ors
and
thei
r car
egiv
ers
and
fam
ilies
• Tr
ain
stro
ke a
nd A
CS te
ams
in d
isch
arge
pla
nnin
g, in
clud
ing
in c
oord
inati
ng c
are
with
prim
ary
heal
th c
are
prov
ider
s
• Tr
ain
prim
ary
heal
th c
are
prov
ider
s in
iden
tifyi
ng h
igh-
risk
patie
nts
(his
tory
of s
trok
e or
ACS
) and
in s
econ
dary
pre
venti
on
• In
crea
se a
cces
s to
med
icati
on
• Re
view
ava
ilabl
e po
st-s
trok
e re
habi
litati
on s
ervi
ces
and
avai
labl
e gu
idel
ines
, use
exi
sting
reso
urce
s to
del
iver
evi
denc
e-in
form
ed re
habi
litati
on p
roto
cols
• Re
view
ava
ilabl
e ca
rdia
c re
habi
litati
on s
ervi
ces
and
guid
elin
es a
nd d
esig
n ne
w s
ervi
ces
Sour
ces:
Bra
ndle
r et
al.
(1),
Matt
sson
et a
l. (2
), Eu
rope
an S
ocie
ty o
f Car
diol
ogy
Gui
delin
es fo
r the
man
agem
ent o
f acu
te m
yoca
rdia
l inf
arcti
on in
pati
ents
pre
senti
ng w
ith S
T-se
gmen
t ele
vatio
n 20
17 (3
), Eu
rope
an S
trok
e O
rgan
isati
on S
trok
e U
nit C
ertifi
catio
n Co
mm
ittee
(4),
Mid
dlet
on e
t al.
(5),
Qui
nn e
t al.
(6),
Dal
al H
asna
in e
t al.
(7),
Har
twel
l et a
l. (8
), El
gend
y e
t al.
(9),
Pena
loza
-Ram
os e
t al.
(10)
.
4.2.
Pri
oriti
es d
urin
g th
e ne
xt 1
–3 y
ears
Stro
keA
CS
Syst
em is
sues
• Co
ntinu
e to
mon
itor t
he p
erfo
rman
ce o
f ind
icat
ors
and
hold
lead
clin
icia
ns a
nd p
rovi
ders
acc
ount
able
• Co
ntinu
e tr
aini
ng c
linic
ians
with
sup
port
from
tele
med
icin
e fa
ciliti
es
• Im
plem
ent s
trok
e an
d AC
S re
gist
ries
• Su
ppor
t the
dev
elop
men
t of a
ssoc
iatio
ns o
f str
oke
patie
nts
Preh
ospi
tal c
are
• Co
ntinu
e to
rais
e aw
aren
ess
amon
g th
e ge
nera
l pub
lic a
nd tr
ain
clin
icia
ns
• Co
ntinu
e eq
uipp
ing
ambu
lanc
es fo
r ACS
or s
trok
e an
d de
velo
p fu
rthe
r the
spe
cial
ist a
mbu
lanc
es c
apab
le o
f thr
ombo
lysi
s fo
r ACS
• Co
ntinu
e tr
aini
ng a
mbu
lanc
e cr
ews
in s
trok
e an
d AC
S
Hos
pita
l car
e
• Im
plem
ent t
he h
ub-a
nd-s
poke
mod
el fo
r str
oke
and
ACS
• Re
fine
acut
e ca
re n
etw
orks
for s
trok
e an
d AC
S us
ing
exis
ting
reso
urce
s
• In
crea
se a
cces
s to
ang
iogr
aphy
by
impr
ovin
g th
e us
e of
exi
sting
reso
urce
s an
d/or
com
mis
sion
ing
prov
isio
n
• Co
ntinu
e tr
aini
ng n
urse
s an
d fe
ldsh
ers
in b
asic
str
oke
care
• St
reng
then
the
use
of c
linic
al s
cale
s to
tailo
r car
e, ta
rget
effo
rts
and
mon
itor p
rogr
ess
and
outc
omes
• Ex
pand
acc
ess
to b
asic
dia
gnos
tic s
ervi
ces
• D
esig
n an
d pl
an th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of c
ritica
l car
e se
rvic
es fo
r pati
ents
with
sev
ere
stro
ke, A
CS a
nd s
ubar
achn
oid
haem
orrh
age
• Pi
lot a
nd e
valu
ate
syst
emic
thro
mbo
lysi
s in
cen
tres
onc
e im
med
iate
CT
scan
ning
pos
sibl
e
• Im
plem
ent e
arly
reha
bilit
ation
and
mob
iliza
tion
prot
ocol
s•
Expa
nd th
rom
boly
sis
(in h
ubs
and
spok
es) a
nd
PCI (
in h
ubs)
4.1.
Pri
oriti
es fo
r 20
18 o
r th
e fir
st 1
2 m
onth
s w
ith
exis
ting
or
limit
ed re
sour
ces conti
nued
26
Stro
keA
CS
Post
hosp
ital c
are
• Co
ntinu
e th
e su
ppor
t to
stro
ke a
nd m
yoca
rdia
l inf
arcti
on s
urvi
vors
and
thei
r car
egiv
ers
and
fam
ilies
with
ong
oing
edu
catio
n an
d sk
ills
trai
ning
• In
crea
se a
cces
s to
med
icati
on a
nd li
fest
yles
cou
nsel
ling
for s
econ
dary
pre
venti
on
• O
rgan
ize
com
preh
ensi
ve re
-eva
luati
on fo
r all
patie
nts
with
car
diov
ascu
lar a
nd c
ereb
rova
scul
ar d
isor
ders
six
mon
ths
after
the
even
t
• Ex
pand
pos
t-st
roke
reha
bilit
ation
ser
vice
s an
d m
easu
re fu
nctio
nal o
utco
me
(usi
ng b
otul
inum
toxi
n in
jecti
on to
redu
ce s
ever
e hy
pert
onic
ity in
hem
iple
gic
mus
cles
)
• Im
plem
ent c
ardi
ac re
habi
litati
on s
ervi
ces
4.3.
Pri
oriti
es d
urin
g th
e ne
xt 3
–5 y
ears
Stro
keA
CS
Syst
em is
sues
• Co
ntinu
e to
mon
itor t
he p
erfo
rman
ce o
f ind
icat
ors
and
hold
lead
clin
icia
ns a
nd p
rovi
ders
acc
ount
able
• Co
ntinu
e tr
aini
ng c
linic
ians
with
sup
port
from
tele
med
icin
e fa
ciliti
es
• Re
view
str
oke
and
ACS
regi
strie
s an
d in
dica
tors
and
pro
duce
an
annu
al re
port
• U
pdat
e th
e im
plem
enta
tion
stra
tegy
in re
spon
se to
the
repo
rt
Preh
ospi
tal c
are
• Co
ntinu
e to
rais
e aw
aren
ess
amon
g th
e ge
nera
l pub
lic a
nd tr
ain
clin
icia
ns a
nd a
mbu
lanc
e cr
ews
• Pu
t am
bula
nce
bypa
ss a
gree
men
ts in
pla
ce
• Co
nsid
er u
sing
mob
ile s
trok
e un
its fo
r rur
al a
reas
Hos
pita
l car
e
• Re
view
the
prog
ress
and
suc
cess
of t
he h
ub-a
nd-s
poke
mod
el fo
r str
oke
and
ACS
• Im
plem
ent c
ritica
l car
e se
rvic
e fo
r str
oke
and
ACS
• Re
fine
acut
e ca
re n
etw
orks
for s
trok
e an
d AC
S us
ing
exis
ting
reso
urce
s
• D
evel
op a
cute
inpa
tient
str
oke
and
ACS
regi
onal
dat
abas
es
• D
evel
op c
oord
inat
ed re
gion
al re
ferr
al s
yste
ms
• Pr
ovid
e te
lest
roke
con
sulta
tions
for s
mal
ler a
nd m
ore
rura
l cen
tres
• Pu
t rep
atria
tion
agre
emen
ts in
pla
ce to
tran
sfer
pati
ents
bac
k to
hom
e co
mm
uniti
es
• Pi
lot a
nd e
valu
ate
adva
nced
str
oke
serv
ices
ratio
naliz
ed to
a s
mal
l num
ber o
f cen
tres
(hub
s)
• Ac
cess
to a
dvan
ced
diag
nosti
cs (h
ubs)
: mag
netic
reso
nanc
e im
agin
g (M
RI),
CT a
ngio
grap
hy
• Ac
cess
to a
dvan
ced
inte
rven
tions
and
criti
cal c
are
serv
ices
(hub
s): e
ndov
ascu
lar t
hrom
bect
omy;
he
mic
rani
ecto
my
for i
scha
emic
str
oke
• In
crea
se b
asic
dia
gnos
tics
(spo
kes)
: CT
scan
s an
d CT
ang
iogr
aphy
; ech
ocar
diog
raph
y; D
oppl
er
ultr
asou
nd; H
olte
r mon
itors
• D
evel
op a
dvan
ced
surg
ical
and
end
ovas
cula
r se
rvic
es
• H
ypot
herm
ia
• Co
mpr
ehen
sive
car
diov
ascu
lar s
urge
ry
• In
terv
entio
nal v
ascu
lar r
adio
logy
• Pe
rcut
aneo
us s
truc
tura
l hea
rt in
terv
enti o
n
4.2
. Pri
ori
ties
du
rin
g th
e n
ext
1–3
yea
rs continued
27
Stro
keA
CS
Post
hosp
ital c
are
• Co
ntinu
e su
ppor
ting
stro
ke s
urvi
vors
and
thei
r car
egiv
ers
and
fam
ilies
with
ong
oing
edu
catio
n an
d sk
ills
trai
ning
• In
crea
se a
cces
s to
med
icati
on a
nd li
fest
yles
cou
nsel
ling
for s
econ
dary
pre
venti
on
• Ex
tend
the
avai
labi
lity
of s
econ
dary
pre
venti
on d
rugs
and
cou
nsel
ling
• O
rgan
ized
pre
venti
on c
linic
s an
d ex
pert
s
• Po
st-s
trok
e ep
ileps
y as
sess
men
t and
man
agem
ent
• Co
gniti
on a
sses
smen
t and
man
agem
ent
• D
epre
ssio
n as
sess
men
t and
man
agem
ent
• Im
plem
ent p
rolo
nged
ECG
mon
itorin
g de
vice
s
• St
reng
then
car
diac
reha
bilit
ation
ser
vice
s
Sour
ces:
Rod
rigue
s et
al.
(11)
, Su
arez
et a
l. (1
2), D
aou
et a
l. (1
3), C
orte
z e
t al.
(14)
, Jeo
n et
al.
(15)
, Ste
rne
et a
l. (1
6), Pa
n Y
et a
l. (1
7), T
an T
anny
et a
l. (1
8).
4.3.
Pri
oriti
es d
urin
g th
e ne
xt 3
–5 y
ears
con
tinu
ed
28
References
1. Brandler ES, Sharma M, Sinert RH, Levine SR. Prehospital stroke scales in urban environments: a systematic review. Neurology. 2014;82:2241–9.
2. Mattsson MS, Mattsson N, Jørsboe HB. Improvement of clinical quality indicators through reorganization of the acute care by establishing an emergency department – a register study based on data from national indicators. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014;22:60.
3. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation 2017. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–77.
4. ESO Stroke Unit Certification Committee. European Stroke Organisation recommendations to establish a stroke unit and stroke center. Stroke. 2013;44:828–40.
5. Middleton S, QASC Trialists Group. Implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols to manage fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in acute stroke (QASC): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1699–706.
6. Quinn TJ, European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee. Evidence-based stroke rehabilitation: an expanded guidance document from the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:99–111.
7. Dalal HM, Doherty P, Taylor RS. Cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ. 2015;351:h5000.8. Hartwell D, Hartwell D, Colquitt J, Loveman E, Clegg AJ, Brodin H, Waugh N et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost–
effectiveness of immediate angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:1–99.
9. Elgendy IY, Kumbhani DJ, Mahmoud A, Bhatt DL, Bavry AA. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2498–505.
10. Penaloza-Ramos MC, Sheppard JP, Jowett S, Barton P, Mant J, Quinn T. Cost-effectiveness of optimizing acute stroke care services for thrombolysis. Stroke. 2014;45:553–62.
11. Rodrigues FB, Neves JB, Caldeira D, Ferro JM, Ferreira JJ, Costa J. Endovascular treatment versus medical care alone for ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;353:i1754.
12. Suarez JI. Diagnosis and management of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015;21(5 Neurocritical Care):1263–87.
13. Daou B, Kent AP, Montano M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Tjoumakaris S et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy: predictors of functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:1773–9.
14. Cortez E, Panchal AR, Davis J, Zeeb P, Keseg DP. Clinical outcomes in cardiac arrest patients following prehospital treatment with therapeutic hypothermia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30:452–6.
15. Jeon SB, Koh Y, Choi HA, Lee K. Critical care for patients with massive ischemic stroke. J Stroke. 2014;16:146–60.16. Sterne JA, Bodalia PN, Bryden PA, Davies PA, López-López JA, Okoli GN. Oral anticoagulants for primary prevention,
treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, and for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21:1–386.
17. Pan Y, Chen Q, Zhao X, Liao X, Wang C, Du W et al. Cost–effectiveness of thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke in China. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110525.
18. Tan Tanny SP, Busija L, Liew D, Teo S, Davis SM, Yan B. Cost–effectiveness of thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke: experience from Australian stroke center. Stroke. 2013;44:2269–74.
29
Ann
ex 5
. Sum
mar
y of
the
road
map
1In
fras
truc
ture
Hos
pita
ls w
ith 2
4/7
cath
eter
izati
on la
bora
tory
and
CT
scan
ning
faci
lity,
with
inte
nsiv
e ca
re u
nit a
nd a
vaila
bilit
y of
thro
mbo
lysi
s an
d th
rom
boex
trac
tion
in s
trok
e, P
CI in
ACS
, end
ovas
cula
r tre
atm
ent f
or s
ubar
achn
oid
haem
orrh
age
Avai
labi
lity
of c
ardi
ac s
urge
ry a
nd n
euro
surg
ery
(on-
site
or r
egio
nal p
lan
of tr
ansf
er)
Avai
labi
lity
of p
ost-
acut
e re
habi
litati
on a
nd lo
ng-t
erm
car
e st
ruct
ures
2Po
licie
sCV
D a
nd e
mer
genc
y ca
re g
over
nmen
t pro
gram
me,
loca
l gui
delin
es a
nd c
linic
al p
athw
ays
prot
ocol
, est
ablis
hed
paym
ent m
odel
(DRG
s?),
conti
nuin
g m
edic
al e
duca
tion
3In
sura
nce
and
fu
ndin
gTo
tal v
olum
e of
car
e pl
anni
ng a
nd fu
ndin
g, c
over
age
of a
ll ex
pens
es fo
r who
le c
ase
4Pa
tient
flow
Firs
t con
tact
Ambu
lanc
eEm
erge
ncy/
inte
nsiv
e ca
re u
nit
Inte
rven
tion
Hos
pita
lRe
habi
litati
onSe
cond
ary
prev
entio
n
ACS
Stro
keAC
SSt
roke
ACS
Stro
keAC
SSt
roke
ACS
Stro
keAC
SSt
roke
ACS
Stro
ke
5G
oals
Firs
t
ACS
awar
enes
s an
d as
sess
men
t
Stro
ke
awar
enes
sFA
ST
asse
ssm
ent
ACS
pre-
aler
t by
am
bula
nce
crew
sEK
G
Defi
brill
ation
Basi
c lif
e su
ppor
t am
bula
nce
equi
pmen
tFA
ST v
alid
ation
Stro
ke p
re-a
lert
Trop
onin
Med
icati
onN
o de
lays
in
emer
genc
y or
in
tens
ive
care
un
it ad
mis
sion
CT s
can
24/7
Caro
tid
sono
grap
hy
No
dela
ys in
em
erge
ncy
asse
ssm
ent
Thro
mbo
lysi
sFe
ver,
suga
r an
d sw
allo
win
g pr
otoc
ol
Thro
mbo
lysi
s 24
/7
Neu
rosu
rgic
al
prot
ocol
s
Inte
nsiv
e ca
re
unit
criti
cal c
are
(mon
itore
d be
d)
ACS
clin
ical
pa
thw
ays
acco
rdin
g to
the
vasc
ular
risk
Med
icati
ongu
idel
ines
ad
here
nce
Stro
ke u
nit c
are
(mon
itore
d be
ds)
Mul
tipro
fess
iona
l ev
alua
tion
Clin
ical
pat
hway
s
Nati
onal
str
oke
guid
elin
e ad
here
nce
Revi
ew c
urre
nt
card
iac
reha
bilit
ation
pr
otoc
ol, G
L an
d fa
ciliti
es
Early
in-h
ospi
tal
reha
bilit
ation
(o
ccup
ation
al
ther
apis
t, S
T,
FKT)
Use
EB
reha
bilit
ation
pr
otoc
ols
Revi
ew,
reor
gani
ze
exis
ting
reso
urce
s an
d se
rvic
es
Mea
sure
fu
nctio
nal
outc
ome
Coor
dina
ted
disc
harg
e pl
anni
ng
with
prim
ary
heal
th c
are
prov
ider
s
Med
icati
on
avai
labi
lity
Life
styl
e co
unse
lling
EBM
med
icati
on
avai
labi
lity
Antic
oagu
latio
n in
pos
t-st
roke
at
rial fi
brill
ation
Care
give
r an
d pa
tient
in
volv
emen
t in
life
styl
e co
unse
lling
Seco
nd
Tim
e ch
ecki
ngTi
me
chec
king
Tele
-ECG
to
ass
ist
thro
mbo
lysi
s in
pre
hosp
ital
setti
ng
Stro
ke
ambu
lanc
e ne
twor
k es
tabl
ishm
ent
Echo
and
co
mpr
ehen
sive
ca
rdia
c di
agno
stic
wor
k-up
for a
ll pa
tient
s
Angi
o CT
sca
n 24
/7ad
vanc
ed
neur
oim
agin
g (M
RI,
perf
usio
n CT
) 24
/7
PCI 2
4/7
Endo
vasc
ular
th
rom
bect
omy
24/7
Endo
vasc
ular
pr
oced
ures
(a
neur
ysm
em
boliz
ation
) 24
/7
Neu
rosu
rger
y
Qua
lity
cont
rol
prog
ram
me:
ACS
regi
stry
Audi
t
Qua
lity
cont
rol
prog
ram
me:
Stro
ke re
gist
ryAu
dit
Esta
blis
h ca
rdia
c re
habi
litati
on
serv
ices
, im
plem
ent c
ardi
ac
reha
bilit
ation
na
tiona
l EB
guid
elin
es
Expa
nd
post
-str
oke
reha
bilit
ation
Impl
emen
t co
gniti
ve
reha
bilit
ation
Dis
pens
ary
obse
rvati
on
12 m
onth
s aft
er A
CS
Com
preh
ensi
ve
re-e
valu
ation
si
x m
onth
s aft
er
the
even
t
6Pe
rspe
ctive
Coun
tryw
ide
disp
atch
ing,
co
ordi
nate
d an
d fle
xibl
e AC
S ne
twor
k
Coun
tryw
ide
disp
atch
ing
prot
ocol
s
Coor
dina
ted
stro
ke
netw
ork
and
ambu
lanc
epr
otoc
ol
Preh
ospi
tal
tria
ge,
coun
tryw
ide
avai
labi
lity
of
preh
ospi
tal
basi
c tr
eatm
ent
with
spe
cial
ist
ambu
lanc
es
capa
ble
of
thro
mbo
lysi
s fo
r ACS
Ambu
lanc
e by
pass
ag
reem
ents
in
pla
ce w
ith
dire
ct tr
ansf
er
from
hom
e to
rem
ote
PCI
cent
re, s
kipp
ing
loca
l non
-PCI
ho
spita
l
Stro
ke n
etw
ork
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Preh
ospi
tal
tria
ge,
ambu
lanc
e by
pass
to
tran
sfer
pati
ent
from
hom
e to
ne
ares
t str
oke
cent
re (s
poke
or
hub)
, ski
ppin
g lo
cal n
on-s
trok
e re
ady
hosp
ital
Cons
ider
mob
ile
stro
ke u
nits
for
rura
l are
as
ECM
OH
ypot
herm
iaSh
ock
trea
tmen
t pr
otoc
ol
Impr
ove
timel
ines
s of
st
roke
car
e em
erge
ncy
asse
ssm
ent
and
inte
rven
tion
at a
ll le
vels
PCI +
CAB
G
on s
iteEx
pand
acc
ess
to a
dvan
ced
inte
rven
tions
and
ne
uroc
ritica
l car
e se
rvic
es:
Thro
mbo
lysi
sEn
dova
scul
ar
proc
edur
esH
emic
rani
ecto
my
Hea
rt te
amTo
tal A
CS
regi
stry
Qua
lity
accr
edita
tion
and
benc
hmar
king
of
stro
ke c
entr
es
Stre
ngth
en c
ardi
ac
reha
bilit
ation
cu
lture
and
se
rvic
es s
uch
as in
prim
ary
heal
th c
are,
an
d in
inpa
tient
an
d ou
tpati
ent
depa
rtm
ents
co
untr
ywid
e
Pref
eren
tial
med
icati
on
supp
ly /
ad
here
nce
cont
rol
prog
ram
mes
Man
agem
ent o
f po
st-s
trok
ede
pres
sion
, ep
ileps
y,
cogn
itive
di
sord
ers
Incr
ease
acc
ess
to p
atien
t ca
regi
ver
educ
ation
and
ev
iden
ce-
info
rmed
dru
gs
7M
onito
ring
and
qual
ity c
ontr
olM
onito
ring,
nati
onal
regi
strie
s, in
dica
tors
30
Ann
ex 6
. Sum
mar
y di
agra
ms o
f the
road
map
Fig.
A6-
1. P
ossi
ble
mod
el o
f ACS
car
e fo
r Ky
rgyz
stan
: pha
se 1
– n
ext 1
–3 y
ears
Urban areas Rural areas
Ambu
lanc
eca
ll
Ambu
lanc
eca
ll
PCI 2
4/7
PCI 9
–16
Preh
ospi
tal t
hrom
boly
sis
Tran
sfer
< 1
20 m
in o
r NST
EMI
Tran
sfer
> 1
20 m
in
Prim
ary
PCI
Phar
mac
oinv
asiv
ePC
I for
NST
EMI
CABG
?
In-h
ospi
tal t
hrom
boly
sis
(if n
eede
d)D
elay
ed P
CI
Reha
bilit
ation
Seco
ndar
y pr
ophy
laxi
s
Loca
l non
-PCI
hosp
ital
In-h
ospi
tal t
hrom
boly
sis
(if n
eede
d)
Reha
bilit
ation
Seco
ndar
y pr
ophy
laxi
s
Tran
sfer
for P
CI o
r CAB
G
Tele
-ECG
31
Fig.
A6-
2. P
ossi
ble
mod
el o
f ACS
car
e fo
r Ky
rgyz
stan
: pha
se 2
– n
ext 3
–5 y
ears
Urban areas Rural areas
Ambu
lanc
eca
ll
Ambu
lanc
eca
ll
PCI 2
4/7
Tran
sfer
< 1
20 m
inor
NST
EMI
Prim
ary
PCI
Phar
mac
oinv
asiv
ePC
I for
NST
EMI
Emer
genc
y CA
BG
Reha
bilit
ation
Seco
ndar
y pr
ophy
laxi
s
Loca
l non
-PCI
hosp
ital
Reha
bilit
ation
Seco
ndar
y pr
ophy
laxi
s
Tran
sfer
for
PCI o
r CAB
G
Preh
ospi
tal t
hrom
boly
sis
PCI 2
4/7
Tran
sfer
> 1
20 m
in
Tele
-ECG
OR
Prim
ary
PCI
Phar
mac
oinv
asiv
ePC
I for
NST
EMI
Emer
genc
y CA
BG
Preh
ospi
tal t
hrom
boly
sis
Tran
sfer
> 1
20 m
in
Tele
-ECG
32
Fig.
A6-
3. P
ossi
ble
mod
el o
f str
oke
care
for
Kyrg
yzst
an: p
hase
1 –
nex
t 1–3
yea
rs
Urban areas Rural areas
Ambu
lanc
eca
ll
Ambu
lanc
eca
ll
Stro
ke u
nit
Tran
sfer
with
in 6
0 m
infr
om a
mbu
lanc
e ca
ll
CT s
can
– fir
st 1
2 h
if st
able
or
imm
edia
tely
in
emer
genc
y ro
om
NIH
SSM
ultid
isci
plin
ary
eval
uatio
nIC
U s
tay
24 h
min
imum
Reha
bilit
ation
Seco
ndar
y pr
ophy
laxi
s
Loca
l hos
pita
lW
ithou
t str
oke
unit
FAST
pro
toco
l
Pre
-ale
rtm
in 1
5 m
in
Stro
ke U
nit
Tran
sfer
with
in 6
0 m
infr
om a
mbu
lanc
e ca
ll
CT s
can
–fir
st 1
2 h
if st
able
or
imm
edia
tely
in e
mer
genc
y ro
om
NIH
SSM
ultid
isci
plin
ary
eval
uatio
nIC
U s
tay
24 h
min
imum
Reha
bilit
ation
Seco
ndar
y pr
ophy
laxi
s
FAST
pro
toco
l
Pre
-ale
rtm
in 1
5 m
in
CT s
can
with
in 1
2 h
Tele
cons
ultatio
nw
ith s
trok
e un
it
OR
Tran
sfer
to re
gion
al s
trok
e un
it
33
Fig.
A6-
4. P
ossi
ble
mod
el o
f str
oke
care
for
Kyrg
yzst
an: p
hase
2 –
the
next
3–5
yea
rs
Brai
n CT
sca
n 24
/7
Stok
e ex
perti
se 2
4/7
with
HU
B
Thro
mbo
lysi
s (a
ltepl
ase)
w
ithin
1 h
from
adm
issi
on
REFF
ERAL
TO
HU
B fo
r:
T hro
mbe
ctom
yN
euro
surg
ery
Vasc
ular
sur
gery
Urban and rural areas
Ambu
lanc
eca
ll
SPO
KE
Tran
sfer
with
in 6
0 m
infr
om a
mbu
lanc
e ca
ll
Brai
n CT
sca
n 24
/7
Stro
ke e
xpertis
e 24
/7
Thro
mbo
lysi
s (a
ltepl
ase)
w
ithin
1 h
from
adm
issi
on
Endo
vasc
ular
thro
mbe
ctom
y w
ithin
6 h
aft
er s
trok
e on
set
Neu
rosu
rger
yVa
scul
ar s
urge
ry
Reha
bilit
ation
Seco
ndar
y pr
ophy
laxi
sFA
ST p
roto
col
Pre-
aler
tm
in 1
5 m
in
Tele
cons
ultatio
nfo
r str
oke
unit
SPO
KE
OR
Tran
sfer
to re
gion
al s
trok
e un
it
HU
B
Tran
sfer
with
in 6
0 m
infr
om a
mbu
lanc
e ca
ll
Pre-
aler
tm
in 1
5 m
in
Stro
ke u
nit
Stro
ke u
nit
34
Annex 7. Possible model of stroke care rehabilitationThe following table presents a possible organization model for settings of care (1). The guiding principle is that rehabilitation starts in the acute phase (early rehabilitation) and continues in the post-acute phase in a proper environment. The current trend is to separate the two things (acute care and rehabilitation), even for financial reasons: the hospitals are reimbursed with a DRG-based system, whereas rehabilitation is reimbursed through a daily rate calculated based on the level of intensity of care provided. The level of intensity of care provided is decided based on patient condition, level of stroke severity (here the Barthel index, NIH stroke scale and other measures are very useful). For example, to be admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, a patient’s Barthel index score must be below 49 and able to do three hours of rehabilitation per day. The number of rehabilitation beds for each region should be calculated based on demographic and epidemiological data.
Setting AdmissionLength of stay
Specialist involvement Features
Inpatient rehabilitation facilitya
5–7 days after stroke
8–45 days
MD: physical medicine and rehabilitation (physiatry) or trained neurologists; allied health personnel: specialized stroke nurse, speech therapist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, social worker, psychologist
General rehabilitation in patient facility with rehabilitation programme suitable for stroke patients and access to neurorehabilitation services. Able to deliver services seven days a week.
Stroke inpatient rehabilitation facilityb
5–7 days after stroke
8–45 days
MD: physical medicine and rehabilitation (physiatry) or trained neurologists; allied health personnel: specialized stroke nurse, speech therapist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, social worker, psychologist
Defined geographical area with suitable facilities, with clinical practice showing evidence of multidisciplinary teamwork: structured team meetings at least weekly, regular programmes of stroke education tailored to the needs of staff and patients, multidisciplinary notes, involvement of family and caregivers in treatment programmes and regular goal planning meetings. Able to deliver services seven days a week.
Nursing home Variable Prolonged and highly variable
MD: geriatrician, internal medicine; nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist
Defined geographical area to admit patients objectively assessed as failing to respond to a tailored programme of stroke rehabilitation or in case the prognosis of other comorbidities does not allow time for a trial of rehabilitation
Outpatient rehabilitation facility
Variable (typically 5–30 days)
Variable
MD: physical medicine and rehabilitation (physiatry) or trained neurologists, specialized stroke nurse, speech therapist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, social worker, psychologist
Outpatient neurorehabilitation services offering different level of rehabilitation intensity, with rehabilitation programme suitable for stroke patients. Able to deliver services seven days a week
aThis is a post-acute level of care. A rehabilitation facility could be part of a hospital or placed outside in a dedicated rehabilitation facility.bStroke inpatient rehabilitation is an inpatient residential rehabilitation facility that is dedicated to stroke care.
35
Reference
1. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–e169.
World Health Organization Regional Office for EuropeUN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 Email: [email protected]: www.euro.who.int
The WHO Regional Office for Europe
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health matters and public health. The WHO Regional Office for Europe is one of six regional offices throughout the world, each with its own programme geared to the particular health conditions of the countries it serves.
Member States
AlbaniaAndorraArmeniaAustriaAzerbaijanBelarusBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGeorgiaGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyKazakhstanKyrgyzstanLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaMonacoMontenegroNetherlandsNorth MacedoniaNorwayPolandPortugalRomaniaRussian FederationSan MarinoSerbiaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTajikistanTurkeyTurkmenistanUkraineUnited KingdomUzbekistan