A Plain Introduction to Criticism of the New Testament, 4th Ed., Vol I (1894)

8/9/2019 A Plain Introduction to Criticism of the New Testament, 4th Ed., Vol I (1894)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-plain-introduction-to-criticism-of-the-new-testament-4th-ed-vol-i-1894 1/485
mM'-i^:'-''-
OF
JAMES
MORGAN
HART
PROFESSOR
OF
ENGUSH
CORNELL
UNIVERSITY
LIBRARY
3
1924
092
355
1
http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924092355100
NEW
TESTAMENT
VOL.
I
GEORGE
BELL
l8o4
si
obtulerimus
pelles
Galeatus.
New
although
have
wishes,
and
the
hearty
prayers
of
the
whole
Church.
May
it
please
God
to
endow
you
SCEIVENER.
Hendon
Vicapage,
Whitsmtide,
1883.
lamented death
purpose
abreast
found
necessary,
as
t
of
the
cations
letter
upon
the
January
17,
1894.
Athos.
AND
COLLATORS
169
189
241
272
284
307
320
327
377
378
379
380
381
384
391
411
2.
(7)
569).
Note
yivijrat
fitOodov
to
be
here given.
(f
s^
a diphthong.
taken from
iicSan-
0€i(T$€ iv ^r]T€i\Te T^v vaâprjvbv
to
tcpvyov
diro
Tov
1
fjiVTjpUtov
ktx^^
is
3
(23)
its
Ammonian
section
(crA7
283)
and
Eusebian
canon
(|8
accents,
&c.,
see
p.
123.
|.
|.
xXivriv Jj
as
discoveries.
Our
passage
b
1
(1).
laws,
and
worked
according
to
the
ordinary
course
of
His
Providential
government,
so
would
scarcely
be
a
guide
unto
holy
living.
For
VOL.
I.
B
escape
the
fate
which
has
over-
ments
century of our
manuscripts
that
the
whole
history
of
literature
of
whether
suggested
by
be
they have
o-re^t
be
readings
met
reduce
them
a
late
Discourse
of
Free
Thinking
by
Phileleutlierus
Lipsiensis,'
Part
i,
Section
S2.
shalt
have
more
or
not
in
our
the four
Revision
Revised,'
pp.
858-861.
English version is
safer
with
oval
vp.lv),
one
Paul's Epistles.
one
from
dictation,
without
having
See
Migne,
Pair.
Lat.
t.
70,
col.
1128.
loaorus
rnj-irepov
fjnas,
the
reading
of
hand,
a
few
cases
occur
wherein
that
which
at
first
sight
seems
a
mere
itacism,
when
once
understood,
affords
an
excellent
sense,
e.
g.
Kadapi(cov
English Book
adds the Gospels
sight
by
the
addition
of
Xptoros
in
the
common
the
others
marginal
notes
in
the
first
instance.
As
v.
the
whole
of
the
parallel
passages.
external
evidence
on
simpler language.
;
the.
question
whether
&\Xd^,
ye,
be,
common
text,
therefore,
seems
viîkT]v
suggestion
of
Granville
Penn
now
no
interest
to
particular
copy
in
5.
ov
TT.
this
source
must
9
ex-
hortation,
49)
©eo's :
Acts
tov
Kvpiov
: perhaps
any
authority
very
possible
that
some
scattered
readings
cannot
be
reduced
to
any
of
the
above-named
classes,
but
enough
has
VOL.
I,
c
^.
or
intentional,
viz.
(4 )
incorporation
of
marginal
glosses
no
existence
in
his
copy,
but
which
was
due
to
'
Ps.
xviii.
Traces
of
the
writer's
the
Greek
Testament
hitherto
published
contains
but
a
comparatively
small
transcription. Such
which
the
text
of
the
form
an
1887).
C
a
of
Chapters
VII-XIV
of
the
first
volume
and
some
portions
else-
where
(indicated
by
being
printed
like
them
in
smaller
type)
are
obviously
intended
chiefly
for
reference,
or
for
less
searching
examination.
immediately
precedes.
this
work,
and
have
furnished
to
this
chapter
many
elements
of
enrich-
ment.
Palaeography,'
Chaps.
II,
III.
date
of
a
manuscript
on
skins,
attention
made
purple-
dyed
fragments
Maunde
Thompson,
p.
44.
scribe.
sculptured walls
Pliny,
Nat.
Hist.
xiii.
11.
Egypt by
that
vellum
(especially
the more
monuments
of
sacred
under the later
tablet.
Maunde
Thompson,
p.
75.
ii.
p.
264).
student
by
tending
to
with
a
precision
otherwise
quite
beyond
our
reach.
referred
for
verification
and
amplification.
period.
Purple-stained
vellum
the
ninth
and
quill pen
or
last
pages,
Codex
Augiensis
eleventh
century.
The
late
Lord
Ashburnham
in
1868
00
former, into Capitals,
the fourth
by others
much like t.
a true
In 1859 the
more
of
the
Septuagint,
the
xvhole
New
Testament
Shepherd
annexed.
he had
letters
which
prevailed
the same word, connected
common writing,
I.
18,
and
once
in
Codex
Z
(Matt.
xxi.
26,
Plate
xlviii).
z
N
a;
tf
2
3
V
xx.
11.
6-15),
the
respect
than
which
predominate
from
the
seventh
or
Cicero
de
Finibus,
Lib.
ii.
c.
35.
The
same
person
is
apparently
meant
in
Orat.
in
Pisonem,
oc.
28,
29.
VOL.
I.
D
sharp
montanus
continued
much
in
vogue
in
1846.
X
y.
CD
1
7)
Its
most
Herculanean
rolls,
Codd.
Vatican.,
confirmed
of the
D
a
monuments)
point is
resembles
Codd.
Ephraemi
and
the
Cottoq
same
at
or
upper
limb
bottom of the vertical line. Compare also the
initial
have the right
make the letter
cases
as
the
papyri
of
Hyperides
and
the New.
(Nos.
into
heavy
triangles
below the
Eossanensis
Once in Cod. Z (Matt. xxi.
5)
Cotton Genesis is
16,
41),
is
straight
line
short.
rolls,
and
Cod.
in Cod. N
in
writing
differ
shapes
which
the
writing
hand
naturally
adopts
Greek
and
Latin
Palaeography.'
of
the
Biblical
manuscripts
of
all
dates
(even
or common
often joined, and
right
'
on
Cod.
481,
which
is
therefore
indisputably
the
earliest.
114,
Museum,
and
important
the
1430.
extant
Bii-ch's
Havn.
1,
a.d.
1278
(Evan.
234)
which
must
therefore
&c.
e.
g.
disappears
from
Biblical
uncials
fifth or
but
usually
inserted
been
mistaken.
twelve
have
in
some
of
these
cases
is
hardly
possible.
us
hesitate
a
point
as
a
careful
reader
would
but
slender
tendency
difference between
fia^Sov
expressed
by
iavrov.
was
very
simple.
In
the
papyri
word,
on
conveniently
too.
556
[xii].
In
the
earliest
cursives
Cod.
Sinai-
ticus).
others,
but
comma.
15.
Abbreviated
words
are
perhaps
least
E
A
straight
line
a line,
:
particularly
in
cursive
writing.
21),
and
XP
Ko™'
'îi- ^.
16. Capital letters of a larger size than the rest
at
the
Herculanean
rolls,
Codd.
Vaticanus,
appear
when
2
Hist.
Eccles.
vi.
25,
cited
by
e/xTToVaJS
oti'xoi and
Aen.
v.
119),
Idyl,
xxiii.
46),
if
the
common
reading
be
correct.
A.D.
490.
Who
distributed
the
o-tCxoi,
of
the
Gospels
(which
are
in
truth
better
usually
to prove
is
very
from
my
request,'
Tischendorf states to be very ancient,
but
Codex Sinaiticus has anxoyv
cttixoi
aro
numbered.
early
editions.
of the testimony of
H of St. Paul
avTiypa(\>ov
Tr](T
opei
[Athos]
a-noKeiixivcov
book
p.
xxii.
New
Testament
consist
of
but
p.
xxx,
n.
8.
the
Epistles
sections
of
the
Codex
to
found
hereafter
(vol.
ii)
that
Ammonian
Sections.
to be nwmbered as the first; and it is worth
notice
Alexandrinus,
Eossanensis,
generally
diflrused
in
TirXovs
exc
i't',
KvpiKaia
di
TTe'.
And
of
Suicer,
s.
v.
;
not
constructed,
like
the
for the
when
was not evident on
in
perfect
good
faith.
the
Eusebian
ascribe
the
sections,
to
Eusebius
Wolfenbiittel
The
too, as well
frag.
contain
both
the
sections
in
the
Cambridge
University
Library
(Mm.
6.
9,
; Dean Burgon
adds to
survive
(p.
806).
so-named Ammonian
the margin of a
well
could
do.
into chapters
(xecîaAota),
as the
Ke4>(iXaia
or tCtXoi
Codices
Alexandrinus
and
Ephraemi,
them
^,
chapters themselves)
searched
Euthalius
is
called
Bishop
of
Sulce
both
his works
expression.
are subdivided
each line.
Euthalius.
In
the
best
copies
form,
author,
were
subscription
to
the
first
Gospel
in
we
I. p
often
found,
set
off
evayyeXiov
VTirjyopivdr]
vtto
Ylirpov
iv
p(ifj,r)C
John.
(Middle Hill
of
the
not
so
often
before
Epistles.
oiKovp,fvLKmv
C
(Tvvobaiv,
including
some
notice
irepl
of
the
rest
of
the
New
Testament,
or
the
tables
%
set
down
in
column
seven
are
also
given
in
Mendham,
Evan.
562.
See
p.
75,
note
1.
of
Europe,
and
occasionally too
Mill
states
that
Cod.
48
(Bodl.
7)
represented.
differently
in
Luke
i.
73,
74
the closet,' is
sacred
the
order
public
worship,
being
much
regard to paragraphs
Codd.
xBD.
Ephraemi,
but
which
is
later
hand.
Besides
these
Scholz
enumerates
only
nineteen
foreign
copies
of
the
whole
New
Testament^;
documents.
vol.
i.
p.
xc.
of the
Kal
Aovko
«ai
fiapKot'
ff.T.X.
name.
3
Suicer,
s.
v.
manuscripts of
the other
class, and
equivalents.
But
in
modern
textual
criticism,
end of a
/eard
aafifiaTov.
Traces
by
each
lesson
(often
in
red
ink)
at
the
top
or
bottom
or
in
the
margin
of
the
several
pages.
Not
only
in
each
and
sixth
centuries.
Thus
Cod.
Alexandrinua
reads
Eom.
efirei' Si
authorities,
probably
has
xiv.
proper
place.
See
p.
85.
gutgebrac^t.
îliUiitlîelt
Budjljonblung
bes
3«=
utii»
2luslanbes.
holy
Evange-
listarium
but little
about
the
notation
Day.
be
regarded
only
as
an
approxima-
tion
to
what
such
an
enumeration
ought
to
be,
though
much
pains
and
&c.
example as
effect
by
Textual
students.
xviii. 22-28.
1
Saint's
Day
VOL.
I.
G
KvpiaK^
5th
24-30.
ii.
4-15.
G 2,
xviii.
weeks,
or
eight
Sundays.
The
first
Sunday
after
Pentecost
is
the
the
for
Good
Friday
evening.
this
time
(which,
unless
Easter
was
very
case),
as
far
as
fell short
of fifty-two
from the Saturday
2.
of the contents of
the
commemorations
of
commence
(the
opening
16-22
14-19
(Wake
12).
(John
xv.
1-11.
Parham
18.)
8.
Birthday
of
the
Virgin,
®(ot6kos,
Matins,
viii.
1-11.
12-17
xiii.
9-13.
Liturgy,
which
(Evst.
286)
is
described
in
its
place
below.
11,
Chap.
i.
order
of
their
relative
value
or
antiquity,
but
mainly
the
monks
a
sharp
lesson,
and
neither
then,
nor
cAer-
of
forty-seven
lines^.'
The
(p.
74).
places
where
a
later
hand
has
been
unusually
busy
(e.g.
Isaiah
i.
1
others
(e.
g.
in
a
out the
a few
thusiastic
the
as
authority.
' Hort
but
by
one
of
his
colleagues
('D')
cancelled,
and
rewritten
by
a
contemporary
exemplar
is
true
of
marked,
as
merely by
two dots
as well
verses
of
not
correct
to
(pp.
Ix
vermilion,
nothing
as
he
must
have
done
indeed
(Burgon,
Quardian,
Jan.
29,
1873).
the
grounds
of
Tischen-
dorf's
on the handwriting,
two, and
probably more,
several
parts
of
the
volume^.
enhanced
dupes
of
his
ingenious
mendacity.'
(p.
99.)
by
Cyril
from
1602
to
1621)
need
not
be
disputed,
although
Wetstein,
on
the
doubtful
authority
of
Matthew
Muttis
prout ex
Ex-
et
laceratum,
854 &c.'
Tor
manuscript
under
the
head
H
KAINH
AIA0HKH,
they
H
a
the
end
of
a
margin
(excepting
1),
if
the
section
begins
milion.
At
the
end
end
precede
pages,
i.
p.
49.
written
to
a
holy
virgin
of
that
name
(of
course
not
the
to
the
Psalms,
is
quite
groundless
in
1633
it has
a
design
whieli
seas
Testament
Sacra,
p.
xxviii.
to
be,
New Testament
pages in
accents, the
supplied
as
Mr.
Cowper
by Mr.
kr)ix\\ro)x.ai.,
V
v—
t
the
critic,
inasmuch
as
romantic
curiosity
which
been
Lat., 400 Gr.
The
New
Testament
fills
4i
thick.
to
the
Hebrews
Old
Testament
(since
the
subscription
same
Pope.
original
writing
(the
ink
whereof
wished
to
16
^
Roman
edition
correctors,
whom
(Praef.
N.
T.
Vat.
1881,
p.
xviii).
common
to
both.
Testament
case
of
the
end
of
St.
Mark's
Gospel.
pp.
49-51.
diligentissimfe
et
there.
to
Ellis,
1862,
pp.
121-154.
and
full
collation
when
he
examined
it
in
1809,
Edward
strength
ad
fidem
codicis
principis
Vaticani,
(as
and
was
often
cursive copy
Dressel
in
1855.
a
word,
(1828-38),
Mai
devoted
to
their
VOL.
I.
I
1860,
on
other.
of every shade
pp.
310,
815.)
by
his
Holiness,
copying
at
length
twenty
licence was not unnaturally
^.
edidit
Ae.
F.
C.
Tischendorf.'
Lipsiae,
4to,
1867.
I
a
of
the
same
age,
but
letters in Cod.
comparison
of
one
document
much
weight
to
the
impression
of
any
person,
however
large
his
experience,
who
has
nothing
but
memory
to
trust
to.
reasons
alleged
above,
which
appearance
of
the
handwriting,
leave
scarcely
a
in
its
scribes,
that
applicable
B'
ver. 82 iKcpvt;
assigns maTevi]T€
to B', B^
of
the
eartv and
working
against
time,
may
accurate
Vercellone,
cire
for
tixe
Sinaitic manuscript
go (Praef.
the
antiquated
divisions
of
its
rival,
and
the
text
is
broken
up
into
smaller
para-
script
will
hardly
answer
to
the
description
rpiaaoL
ml
TfTpaaad
(see
p.
27,
note
1)
in
Gehhardt
the
words
36)
with
iy
argue
that
extant
in
Cod.
N
be
by
a
contemporary
hand
(see
p.
9i,
and
Dean
Gwyun's
Mumnrfm
be
consulted.
times
does
not
confirm
their
conjecture,
and
the
argument
derived
from
orthography
or
speaks of
no bearing
of B,
by
I
that
Cod.
B
was
written
in
Italy,
Cod.
N
in
Palestine
or
Syria
(Quarterly
'
cated,
p.
74.
(ibid.
p.
204).
like
that
left
vacant
of
the
preceded
each
Gospel
some vocal
heads
omitted
did
the
same
in
the
oy
Tcoc
^cjDcepAOMAiTiiTpocce
cyMoiAKoAoyeei
ejrHAoejMoyisioyTocoAoroceicToyc
jke^êwTecn
e
cjujidAdTeTticncse^jxieê
of
all
the
substituted by mistake for some other numeral. One of the
three
remaining
has
recently
been
accounted
for
by
/3'
the
detected in
peculiar
to
itself^.
They
(:)
(Scrivener,
Introd.
p.
xxviii).
a
hand
of
about
the
twelfth
century,
lessons
for
the
Festivals
of
St.
George
and
St.
Dionysius,
the
patron
saints
of
England
and
France,
as
may
be
seen
i,
the
numeral
This,
by-the-bye,
is
Athos.'
by Mr. Rendel Harris,
both
instructive
in
the
highest
degree
and
amusing.
[90)
uncials,
and
might
well
have
been
Testament
18,
1886.
E
2
of omicron where the
very
4.
The
value
of
this
to the
not
loose in
the Four
authority
as
F™^.
both
Monumenta sacra
John
xviiL
(32.)
51 ?
j^H
^^^
*
•TovttHnA£Hlî4 î»H'^1r »A
of
their
times
latest
it for
other
palimpsests,
have
the
pseudo-Ammonian
sections
without
the
Eusebian
canons
(see
p.
61).
Of
the
first.
The
from
twenty-nine
to
;
two
united
however,
so
too
good
reason.
The
indepen-
>*--y
e
irtAsv*;
of
fragments
of
a
menology
prefixed
John
xxi.
15-25.
It
was
written
in
about
the
eighth
century
and
consists
of
257
leaves
quarto,
of
thick
vellum,
9
inches
high
by
6^
broad,
with
two
columns
of
twenty-five
lines
each
on
a
page,
regularly
marked,
as
we
so
often
see,
by
the
stilus
and
ruler
(p.
27).
This
is
doubtless
Stephen's
rj',
though
he
cites
it
erroneously
in
Acts
xxiv.
7
bis;
xxv.
14-,
xxvii.
1;
xxviii.
11:
it
was
even
canon
(B
or
2).
determine
by
actual
inspection
that
they were portions of the same manuscript, of the date
of
about
the
end
of
the
way
upon
it,
being
used,
as
some
usually
neglected)
level
with
the
(Paris,
1877),
3°
s6r.
torn.
iii.
pp.
386-419.
the
beginning
of
a
syllable
has
two
dots
over
it,
T
this
Tischendorf
dis-
Misc.
Gr.
5,
S.
318-4^.
0°.
Magnificat
in
the
Hort.
Isidore
3-20 ;
xiv.
8-22.
Published
in
the
Jahrbucher
(Vienna)
d.
Lit.
1847.
*-*
^
by the late Canon
Luke,
but
quite
19-21.
VOL.
I.
L
four
to
Carpianus
and
Eusebian
canons
are
prefixed,
and
it
contains
many
later
corrections
of its readings
rough,
though
Tischendorf
(who
has
inspected
the
codex)
says
letters Tischendorf compares
a douhle palimpsest
L 2
John
i.
25-42
the
times each,
shape,
frequently
less
than
four
phototypice
representatum
manifest' (Tregelles'
in
from
this
copy
to
Birch,
who
in
Mark
from Matthaei's plate, it
century.
Matt.
v.
44
vi.
12;
ix.
18
extracts
that
Wetstein
copied
and
numbered
Evan.
87.
.
Cod. A, and its
5).
They
comprise
portions
in
red
at
the
top
under the
(
p.
195).
Each
page
has
two
columns
of
about
forty-five
lines
each.
There
are
no
divisions
by
xv.
33
xvi.
6
are
illegible
in
parts,
and
xvi.
6-8
have
perished.
Matt.
v.
45
survives
only
In
the
commentary.
=
^
of the
14,
cursive
copy
Saturday
Bevieio
(Aug.
seems
to
suppose.
of
scholarship
edition
of
others,
and
for
the
the
MS.
fifty
had
originally
twenty-one
lines
to
the
page,
and
fourteen
had
twenty-three.'
Dr.
Ezra
Abbot.
combine less often than
(facsimile
No.
35).
copied
from
the
same
archetype,
about
the
same
time.
He
has
produced
more
whole arrangement and
heretic
Godeschalk
[d.
866]
are
pointed
out
for
refutation
at
the
hard
texts,
Luke
xiii.
24;
a
circumstance
which
demonstrates
vol.
iv.
p.
197).
' jxoi ' Apov
Wait's
translation).
Leipsic. It consists
and
Eusebian
canons
stand
in
the
inner
margin.
A
few
breath-
ings
are
primd
Tnanu,
and
many
century,
assigning
pecially
6000)
are
are
from
the
a
later
hand,
contains
Luke
xi.
37-41
42-45.
last
rubra)
being
p.
58,
Tischendorf
describes
an
early
cursive
that
be
written
in
uncial
493.
Kanjpaa'aTO.
Library
'
avriypaôiv' rtuy
82,
33.
VOL.
I.
M
seems
Moscow
fragment
O,
have
by
name
Chrysos-
most
characteristic.
It
stands
alone
Cod. L or others
twenty-
four
times,
but
^5
with
ACD
twelve,
are omissions,
century),
of
instances
sides
with
gold. Like
M
a
for the doxology in the
Lord's Prayer, Matt. vi. 13. The
manuscript
Dean
of
Chichester.'
Athenaeum,
No.
802,
Sept.
19,
1885.
(pp.
33-40),
belong
to
the
older
;
also lists of the KeâAaia majora and rtVXot in the
upper margins of the
recent
in
general
appearance,
does
in
the
the
proportion of three to one. With the
cognate
purple
manuscript
been copied
Mark
vi.
xiv.
36
irX'nv
before
akX' :
xv.
Additional
31919,
Dr.
Gregory
discovered
two
more
leaves,
making
thirty-six
apxaC
and
TeXr],
T.
by
10^,
and
en
pi
D
PL,
o
X
w
p
o
o
than
4J
broad.
The
line
in
St.
Mark,
and
the
folios.
There
is
initial
O's.
The
writing
is
continuous
in
full
line
without
stichometry.
comma or double comma,
character of the letters
may probably
to the large
body of Uncials and
side,
whilst
in
thirty-eight
it
agrees
with
2.
times
with
t<
or
B.
Like
2
it
by
some
of
the
Crusaders,
St. Matthew
first
six
folios
are
in
a
bad
only
the
%\
Prolegomena,
p.
445.
O.
In
Gospels.
Gregory,
p.
446.
interpolations
and
rarest
various
readings.
The
contrary
supposition
we
one
of
its
munificent
Chancellor,
Expositio
Eetractata.'
the
commencement
of
each
of
faint.
There
seem
of
St.
Petersburg,
written
(22),
palimpsest.
usual;
then
Tischendorf
in
1843,
often
with
proportion of various readings elsewhere, except in i Peter. The
upper
or
later
writing
in
this
manuscript
is,
for
once,
available
fragments
the
Cod.
Laudianus.
Each
page
has
but
one
Epistles
(the
of
their
ct7ixo'
before
the
Hebrews
in
this
codex
derived
from
Petri.
the
changes
scriptions.
D''
supplied
Rom.
i.
27-30
and
takes
its
name from the Abbey of St. Germain des Prez near
Paris.
Towards
the
end
the
seventh
century,
is
certainly
too
high.
: the Greek
Prolegomena
and
a
photograph
vol.
I.
N
to
the
ninth
century.
end
of
each
word.
The
Latin
the
miiddle
before viroKpiai,
manuscript,
which
has
also
inserted
but
106 instances agree with the Latin
of the sister
to
enrich
his
1675
(Trin.
ejusdem
veteris
exemplaris
apographo.'
N
3
of
each
page
Mor saido
return
from
Rome,
whence
Marcus
went
home-
wards,
leaving
his
books
and
Moengal
behind
him.
accord
even
in
men
unskilled
in
Greek
could
fall
into,
their
division
of
the
Greek
words,
though
equally
false
and
the same
transcript of
for
such
monsters
KeKavTripiaa/tevav
places
above
the
Greek of F. It was at the same time perhaps that some
ill-divided
Mr.
Hort's
Latin
texts
as
certainly
exemplar ', (Introd.
Fienche
Kiliensis,
1889.
Library as
Bishop
Porphyry
(one),
or
at
Turin
(two).
The
leaves
at
Paris
contain
I
which
retouched
;
p. 63,
note 1.
Hamburg
64,
the
Hamburg
part
as
68.
at
Moscow
shape
(Printed
Text,
p.
158,
note).
East.
It
contains
taining
a
Cor.
xi.
9-19.
city)
was
judiciously
substituted
by
Wet-
tive.
iv.
p.
iii),
and
afterwards
Q
N.
T.
and
eighty-eight.
Part
I.
therefore
speak
of
them
with
all
abbreviations,
a
list
of
which
we
subjoin
Mr. A.
more
deeply
indebted
than
it
would
afforded
towards
the
preparation
of
this
and
the
second
edition.
Ed.
iii.
also
called
edogadion.
the
written on
the
thirteenth
century.
The
Thus
297
(38)
within
parentheses
Appendix
A
to
this
volume;
and
for
a
list
of
Facsimiles,
see
Appendix
B.
(Kuster's
Paris
3,
to
(Burgon,
Ghiardian,
Jan.
*
'
the
contents
Testament
{see
p.
72,
note),
and
was
given
by
Nicephorus
condition, with much
SS.
Mark,
Luke,
and
John
ff.
232
(22),
K£(p.
pict.
Extensively
7^x5|,
Gospels are
8|
x
5j,
cJtart.,
Paul,
belonged
to
that
noble
collection
t,
led.,
avayv.,
syn.,
men.,
subscr.,
(ttIx.,
contains
the
whole
New
Testament
{see
p.
72,
note),
with
many
corrections.
except
S
the
St.
Mark).
42.
Cod.
Medioaeus
exhibits
of
1550:
they
professed
to
be
extracted
from
an
'exemplar
Eegium
Medicaeum
note
3.
Acts
and
Epistles,
8J
x6f,
ff.
199
(23)
and
190
(25),
t.,
Ke(f>.
i.,
the
examined
by
Dr.
proved the close
larger
chapters
(p.
55)
with
their
appropriate
capitals.
in
the
same
breath,
he
stigmatizes
the
Wesleyan
minister
is employed,
is
not
quite
the
same
of
Cod.
61.
is
size. Car;p.,
School, Dean
and
with
accents

A Plain Introduction to Criticism of the New Testament, 4th Ed., Vol I (1894)

Documents

Transcript of A Plain Introduction to Criticism of the New Testament, 4th Ed., Vol I (1894)