A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic...

19
HERUS SBE19 Graz A Pagani and C R Binder

Transcript of A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic...

Page 1: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

HERUS

SBE19Graz

A Pagani and C R Binder

Page 2: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

STATE OF THE ART

Page 3: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

‘Sustainability’ remains an ambiguous notion that is rarely regarded in its EnvironmentalSocialEconomicCultural components

3Martens P and Rotmans J (2005); Evans B et al. (2016); UN Environment and IEA (2017) Picture: Tétouan Favelas

Page 4: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

In 2017 in Switzerland 1 in 6 vacant apartments was newly-built

4Lawrence R J (1987); Wong G K M (2002); Prochorskaite A et. al (2016); Credit Suisse Group AG (2018); Swiss Federal Office (2018)

Tree swing cartoon (origin: early 70s)

Page 5: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

We need to understand the factors driving households’ decisions to ensure acceptability and acceptance of the housing sustainable solutions and overcoming the ‘innovation resistance’ of the building sector.

5

Page 6: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

FILL THE GAP

Page 7: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

We propose an interdisciplinary framework that links the elements playing a role in the decision-making process of tenants.

We investigate how the elements of the framework hinder sustainable housing strategies.

We challenge how sustainable interventions are currently designed and promoted.

7

Page 8: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

METHODS

Page 9: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

Framework development

Qualitative Group Discussion

9Patton M Q (1980); Guba E G (1981); Miles M and Huberman M (1994); Tue U B L (2013); Ajzen (2013); Robinson O C (2014)

Page 10: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

RESULTS 1. FRAMEWORK

Page 11: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

DEMAND & SUPPLY

ENVIRONMENTSOCIAL STRUCTURE

CHARACTERISTICSsocio-economic attributes

CHARACTERISTICSdesign, location, neighborhood

meanings, norms, capital, power natural, technical

dwelling

intention

BEHAVIORAL CONTROL

DETERMINANT FUNCTIONmeanings

CORE FUNCTIONmeanings

SUBJECTIVE NORM

ATTITUDE

past experience

threshold

tenant

BEHAVIORto move, to select

action

Figure 1. A new framework for tenants' residential mobility and location choice (Pagani and Binder, 2019).

11Giddens A (1978); Ajzen I (1991) ); Binder C R (2007); Meadows D H (2008)

Page 12: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

RESULTS 2. FUNCTIONS

Page 13: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

Table 1. Extract of the functions ranked by the tenants among the three most and three least important in the group discussion. (Pagani and Binder, 2019).

13

Page 14: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS

Page 15: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and location choices of tenants.

15

Page 16: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

TO CONCLUDE

Page 17: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

We provide a systemic understanding to the study of tenants’ decision-making process

…to inform the actors in the housing value chain about housing dynamics

…and eventually mitigate the current discrepancies in the Swiss rental housing market, which prevent the promotion of innovative and acceptable housing solutions.

Housing functions as reading keys or design tools

Integration of disciplines

Integration of functions for absorbing triggers;

understand and overcome the implication of each function;

adapt to location.

17

Page 18: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

Check degree of dependence to the context

Quantify the relationship between trigger, satisfaction and function (survey)

18

Page 19: A Pagani and C R Binder · (Pagani and Binder, 2019). 13. RESULTS 3. TRIGGERS. Table 2. Thematic Conceptual Matrix: Relationship between levels of satisfaction and the mobility and

Anna Pagani

PhD student

EPFL ENAC IIE HERUS

[email protected]

HERUS

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

QUESTIONS?

SBE19Graz