A NEW CONTINUUM CONVERSATION. Our Friends in Boston! 2.
-
Upload
kristian-clarke -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
description
Transcript of A NEW CONTINUUM CONVERSATION. Our Friends in Boston! 2.
A NEW CONTINUUM CONVERSATION
Our Friends in Boston!
2
Meeting Objectives
2
• Progress update on Design Team work development and supporting work activity
• Economic analysis update and next steps in phased research effort
• Update on assessing systems integration opportunities and other collaborative efforts
• The spinning plates of the 2016 agenda• Learning from the health supported housing
collaborative (HSH)
Business Case Policy Development Work:
ROI on integrating silos and funding streams via
Core Group member data analysis; existing literature and other
sources
Example: Mental Health Collaboratives
Design Team Work:Community driven
initiative(s) that fosters community capacity for health and well-being as
people define it
Example: Post-Acute
Work
Example: Data
Exchange Initiatives
Each circle informs and shapes the others and all Circles embed a focus on health disparities and health equity
Emerging 2016 Agenda
Weaving Work: Connecting and
coalescing initiatives under a
common framework to leverage
momentum and share learnings
Example: Community
Health Assessments
Core Group Work: Design and support
parallel systems integration initiative
(e.g. continuum navigation)
Business Case Policy Development Work:
ROI on integrating silos and funding streams via
Core Group member data analysis; existing literature and other
sources
Example: Mental Health Collaboratives
Example: Post-Acute
Work
Example: Data
Exchange Initiatives
Each circle informs and shapes the others and all Circles embed a focus on health disparities and health equity
Weaving Work: Connecting and
coalescing initiatives under a
common framework to leverage
momentum and share learnings
Example: Community
Health Assessments
Core Group Work: Design and support
parallel systems integration initiative
(e.g. continuum navigation)
Design Team Work:Community driven
initiative(s) that fosters community capacity for health and well-being as people define it
Design Team Progress
6
Design Team Plan To Pursue Charge Of “Fostering Community Capacity To Support Health And Well-being As People And Families Define It”
Design Team Starting Point
Likely and Necessary By-Products
SUPPORT COMMUNITIES IN DEVELOPING RESILIENCY PLANS
COMMUNITY DEFINED MEASURES OF SUCCESS
(building in accountabilities for all, including health systems)
Developed by community and grows out of culture: our way of knowing, being and living. To build a plan, communities will likely draw on:
Lived experience/historical trauma that can lead to prevention Health and well-being Mental health (childhood and adult) Aging throughout life Education Values, norms and traditions Community assets Local health care providers are embedded in process
Design Team Role: Help resource planning and implementation Embed leaders in planning process to learn Invest in determining return on investment Invest in sustainability
1. Identify target communities via readiness for resiliency planning
• Presence of community-based bridge/coach/facilitator/champion• Interest of community in resiliency planning initiative• Precedence for collaborative work in community• Existing or potential organizing structure to house or support work• Opportunity to impact health inequities, disparities and/or
structural racism in the community• Potential to include and engage local health system in initiative
2. Facilitate (through a community member) a collaborative resiliency planning process
• Community invites and convenes • Community scopes focus of work and sets shared goals• Community members articulate roles and responsibilities• Community undertakes resiliency planning approach within
context of health and wellbeing and scoped focus area• Community establishes success measures and desired outcomes
and creates a plan that will foster the measures and outcomes• Community implements and measures progress
3. Implement and track impact • Study progress with a focus on community capacity building• Articulate capacity building elements and connection to health• Document implications for systems integration efforts in serving
those with chronic disease and behavioral health challenges
Scope of Focus
Community Capacity to foster health and
wellbeing
Resiliency planning at the community level
through
Design Team Resiliency Framework
Final Community Candidates
9
Name Focus Description Bridge/ Champion Silos Contact Geography
Suburban Ramsey Family Collaborative
Families Improving support systems with a focus on wellness, learning, safety, and security through Concerted Social Action model
Mary Sue Hansen
M. Schoedl and E. Trinty
East Metro
Curanderismo Hispanic/ Latino
Curanderas: traditional healing and self-care
Selma Sroka and Kim Hart
S. Koepplinger West Metro
Leech Lake Tribal Organic resiliency process aligned with general resiliency framework through the Mino-ayaawigamig Wellness Center
Matt Hanson L. Hunter/ S. Koepplinger
Rural tribal reservation
Example: Mental Health Collaboratives
Example: Post-Acute
Work
Example: Data
Exchange Initiatives
Each circle informs and shapes the others and all Circles embed a focus on health disparities and health equity
Weaving Work: Connecting and
coalescing initiatives under a
common framework to leverage
momentum and share learnings
Example: Community
Health Assessments
Core Group Work: Design and support
parallel systems integration initiative
(e.g. continuum navigation)
Design Team Work:Community driven
initiative(s) that fosters community capacity for health and well-being as
people define it
Business Case Policy Development
Work: ROI on integrating silos and funding streams via Core
Group member data analysis; existing
literature and other sources
Business Case Analysis Update
10
Business Case Analysis Update
Goal: attempt to quantify and articulate the costs of fragmentation and the benefits of integration to build a case for policy and funding innovation across the continuum.
11
Business Case Analysis Survey Responses
Number of Organizations Responding
Cross-continuum Triple Aim programs
Community-based and/or –owned
programs aimed at fostering
community health
Programs aimed at reducing health
disparities
10 28 21 16
Next Steps:• Initial data scrub and summary• Interviews with all 10 organizations• “Data dump” from 1-2 organizations• Detailed data request to other 8 organizations for most relevant data• Analysis to be delivered end of Decembero Includes: two rounds of qualitative interviewing, one round of quantitative
data analysis, identification of where this project could fit within existing literature on public/community health collaboratives, and an outline sequencing phase two of analysis
Business Case Policy Development Work:
ROI on integrating silos and funding streams
via Core Group member data analysis; existing literature and
other sources
Example: Mental Health Collaboratives
Design Team Work:Community driven
initiative(s) that fosters community capacity for health and well-being as
people define it
Example: Post-Acute
Work
Example: Data
Exchange Initiatives
Each circle informs and shapes the others and all Circles embed a focus on health disparities and health equity
Weaving Work: Connecting and
coalescing initiatives under a
common framework to leverage
momentum and share learnings
Example: Community
Health Assessments
Systems Integration Opportunities
Core Group Work:
Design and support parallel
systems integration initiative
(e.g. continuum navigation)
13
Potential Opportunities
• Post-acute “IT” work• Center for Community Health• Health supported housing (HSH)• East Metro Mental Health Roundtable
Goal: top candidates for systems integration pilot(s) are clearer by December Core Group meeting and may be
ready for selection
MINNEAPOLIS HEALTH SUPPORTED HOUSING CIRCUIT BREAKER PROJECT
Circuit breaker n. An automatic switch that stops the flow of electric current in a suddenly overloaded or otherwise abnormally stressed electric circuit
Breaking the Cycle through HSH
Goal: Improve outcomes and reduce total service costs for the target population through multi-sector collaboration
Overview: Integrated health, wellness and social supports delivered in 90 permanent supportive housing units using an innovative, replicable model
Location: Downtown Mpls
Target population: Very low income Homeless or housing
instability Medically fragile with
chronic medical conditions
High utilizer of crisis, ER, hospital and psych services
Mental illness and/or chemical dependency
Health Supported Housing
Million-Dollar Murray
Why problems like homelessness may be easier to solve than to manage.
BY MALCOLM GLADWELL
Minnesota ACA reform saved $61.5 million, can guide innovation
State’s “shared savings” program rewarded providers that cut costs. By Editorial Board Star Tribune July 4, 2015
The Current System
System Map with Health Supported Housing
Moving Forward
Housing Funding: Secure funding commitments for development
State, County and Health Plan engagement: approval of circuit-breaker “gain sharing” model for health supported housing demonstration
Next Steps: Data: Gather data on
current costs and potential savings
Modeling: Develop economic model to estimate the potential ROI
Partnership: Expand multi-sector and state agency support and collaboration
Project Partners Aeon HCMC Hennepin Health Touchstone Mental
Health Hennepin County Westminster
Presbyterian Church Corporation for
Supportive Housing
21
Our Work in 2016
2016 Silos Spinning Plates
CEO Council/
Core Group•Convening•Oversight•Strategy•Ambassadors for change
Messaging & Comms
•Broadly disseminate through web and other social media
•Quarterly reports
Funding Mobilization
•Identify and pursue potential grant opportunities
•Seek funding support from other Silos partner orgs
Design Team
•Articulate key learnings from community resiliency, develop tools for spread, disseminate
Community Resiliency
•Resourcing 2 communities
•Evaluate system implications
•Replication implications
Systems Integration
•Seed 2 initiatives
•Fund•Evaluate•Identify policy implications
Business Case Policy Devpt
•Outline phase two of work
•Implement•Identify and organize around policy implications
22
Moving Forward
Core Group Engagement
Potential new Core Group members:• LeadingAge• Care Partners• MHA• UCare• Medica• Touchstone Mental Health• HCMC
• What are our immediate next steps and assignments before our next meeting?
Next Steps
24
Appendix
25
Core Group Work: Design and support
parallel systems integration initiative
(e.g. continuum navigation)
Business Case Policy Development Work:
ROI on integrating silos and funding streams via
Core Group member data analysis; existing literature and other
sources
Example: Mental Health Collaboratives
Design Team Work:Community driven
initiative(s) that fosters community capacity for health and well-being as
people define it
Example: Post-Acute
Work
Example: Data
Exchange Initiatives
Each circle informs and shapes the others and all Circles embed a focus on health disparities and health equity
Emerging 2016 Agenda
Weaving Work: Connecting and
coalescing initiatives under a
common framework to leverage
momentum and share learnings
Community Health
Assessment
26
Shaping the 2016 Agenda
• What’s already emerging?
• What’s still missing and what do we want to do about it?
• Systems change initiatives:– Currently there is not a systems change initiative emerging from the
Design Teams…do we want that to be a point of focus? If so, how will we determine what that is?
• Potential options for doing that:– Letting economic work guide us– Related initiatives (e.g. post-acute “IT” work)– Generating the topic among us