“a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

download “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

of 15

Transcript of “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    1/15

    September, 2014

    1

    “A network that responds to a complex innovation

    ecosystem: Knowledge, Innovation and Territory

    Platform, a case study” 

     Josep M. Vilalta, Josep Alías and Alicia Betts

     Association of Public Universities of Catalonia

    ABSTRACT

    It may seem obvious that universities and higher education institutions play a key role inhuman capital development and innovation systems, as is equally decisive the role thatindustry plays, as well as the one that public administration has. Nevertheless, it is notuncommon in innovation systems around the globe that there be no joint space where thesethree actors communicate, discuss and work together for the benefit of the region. As theOECD pointed out in the study “Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive andLocally Engaged” (2007), through their research teaching and community engagement,

    universities can be key actors fostering and supporting regional innovation. However,successful regional cooperation is reliant on the ability of all three key organizational players(universities, government/public authorities and business) to establish strong and feasiblepartnerships. The Platform for Knowledge, Territory and Innovation (Plataforma CTI) is a

    strategic project that aims to strengthen the economic and social development of Catalonia(Spain) by working as a cooperation forum for regional innovation. It promotes an interactionand stable cooperation between universities, industry and the government striving for socialprogress, economic competitiveness and the cultural vitality of the region.

    This initiative works as a horizontal network that seeks to create the necessary environmentand space to allow universities, the industrial and business sector and the publicadministration to enhance co-operation and long-term dialogue and allow for joint initiatives,discussions and specific actions to be created in the context of regional innovation.

    Keywords: innovation, network, university, regional development

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    2/15

    September, 2014

    2

    Universities for regional development and innovation

    We are witnessing the transformation of the role of state in academia, the role of corporationsin innovation and of the university in the economy (Etzkowitz 1983 and 1995). Universities,and higher education institutions in general, play a key role in human capital development and

    innovation systems in their regions. Higher education institutions are increasingly recognizedas being stimulators of the economic and social innovation systems in their region. In addition,there is growing awareness on how universities can contribute to regional innovation throughcollaboration with business, local and regional governments and other local actors which areclosely linked to the concept of the universities’ third mission. Universities are encouragedmore and more to fulfill their third mission engagement in the region’s innovation system(Josep M. et al, 2010).

    The triple helix model is often used to explain the actors of innovation systems and/or ways ofknowledge production. In this model, universities (and other knowledge-producinginstitutions) acquire prominence, acting in partnership with industry and government and even

    taking the leadership in joint initiatives in a balanced model (Etzkowitz & Ranga, 2010). At thesame time, the government encourages, but does not control, these relationships through itsregulatory capacity, financial assistance (like a venture capitalist) and/or via new actors.Finally, industry benefits from this situation as it is easier to establish collaborative R&Dprojects with knowledge-based institutions providing the opportunity to work with scientists(Josep M et al., 2010). Figure 1 below illustrates the three actors and the way they interact.The places where they overlap is where interaction occurs.

    Figure 1 A Triple Helix configuration with negative and positive overlap among the three subsystems by Etzkowitz

    and Leydesdorff (2012)

    The Quadruple Helix Model adds the social dimension, the citizens, society into the equation ofactors that interact. The Quadruple Helix type of innovation activity enables a larger variety ofinnovations than the Triple Helix model does. The Triple Helix type of innovation activityfocuses on producing high-tech innovation based on the latest technology and researchknowledge. Because of this, the Triple Helix model is considered to lend itself better forscience-based high-tech companies than for other kind of businesses while the QuadrupleHelix type of innovation activity focuses on producing other kinds of innovations and applyingexisting technology, research knowledge and user knowledge (Arnkil et al., 2010). 

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    3/15

    September, 2014

    3

    Figure 2 Regional Innovation System (Tödtling, 2006) 

    According to Tödling (2006) Higher education institutions can have several roles in regional ininnovation systems and clusters of knowledge based economies, such as:

    1. 

    “Antenna” for adopting external knowledge and mediator for local knowledgecirculationUniversities serve as entities that link global knowledge communities, networks andkey actors via their activities (research, conferences, seminars, etc.) and serves avariety of different actors in the innovation systems. A well-functioning innovationsystem requires local circulation of absorbed knowledge through various mechanisms.

    2. 

    Source of highly qualified labor

    The universities traditional mission of teaching is becoming key for knowledgeeconomies as the importance of human capital in knowledge economies is critical.Having a highly skilled labor force is the most powerful mechanism for knowledgetransfer.

    3. 

    Knowledge provider in university-industry linkagesUniversities have become important partners innovation partners for industry inknowledge based economies. We find an increasing variety of relationships: R&Dcontracts, R&D collaborations, innovation partnerships, joint use of facilities, informalknowledge exchange. There is a shift from simple knowledge transfer towardsknowledge sharing and interactions (Mode 2 knowledge production).

    4. 

    Incubator for academic spin-off companies

    A relatively new route for commercialization of academic inventions are the creation

    of spin-off companies. In this sense, Europe is clearly behind the US due to many

    barriers (i.e. venture capital, incentives, organizational rules, work culture…). Spin-offs

    are more frequent in high tech industries and clusters such as ICT or biotech.

    The regional dimension of innovation is therefore crucial to promote long term economic

    growth and competitiveness. Since universities provide knowledge, human capital and global

    connections they are key actors in the process of developing regional specialization strategies

    and are key for supporting innovation. Higher education institutions, rather than “ivory

    towers” devoted to the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake they are increasingly seen as

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    4/15

    September, 2014

    4

    instruments for knowledge based economic development and change by a growing number of

    industrial-economy and developing-economy governments. From a regional policy perspective,

    this is often put into practice, for example, by the formation of regional partnerships,

    stimulation of cluster development, creation of regional attractiveness and multi-sector policy

    initiatives (Lindqvist, 2012). Catalonia and its Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform is

    an example.

    The University-Business collaboration ecosystem

    According to The State of European University‐Business Cooperation report (Davey et al., 2011)despite there being some exceptions, cooperation between higher education institutions andthe business/industrial sector in Europe is still in the early stages of development.

    Figure 2 is a good illustration of the University-Business cooperation ecosystem that includesthe impact, the outcomes and the action levels. Although it only takes into consideration

    bilateral agreements between institutions and businesses, the ecosystem can be applied to thecontext of the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform initiative.

    Figure 3 The University-Business ecosystem 

    The report concludes that there is a general movement toward longer-term strategicpartnerships between higher education institutions and the business/industrial sector. Thereport also highlights that despite the efforts from the top level of the higher educationinstitutions to coerce relationships between the sectors, these relationships often begin from amore personal interaction involving a researcher around mutually beneficial topics of interest(Davey & Galán-Muros, 2011).

    Owing to the importance that university and business relations are taking in the currentcontext, there has been an increase in creating tools and methodologies for university-

    business partnering. One of these tools is the Stairway Model to Strategic Partnership,developed in 2007 (see figure 3 below). The model proposes an overall strategy for managing

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    5/15

    September, 2014

    5

    cooperation with business centered on the principle that cooperation between universitiesand businesses are at one of the stages of development. For each stage there is acorresponding set of strategies and actions (Davey & Galán-Muros, 2011).

    Figure 4 The Stairway Model to Strategic Partnership  

    This model is focused on relationships between one university and a specificbusiness/company. The Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform has a differentapproach since it gathers a set of companies that represent the business sector and a group ofuniversity institutions. Despite the different approach, this model can be useful to understandhow institutional ties become tighter and more strategic involving, on each side, more seniorrepresentatives at higher management levels, e.g. at the strategic  partnership stage, apresident on behalf of the HEI and a CEO on behalf of the business as time passes and therelationship intensifies and consolidates (Davey et al., 2011).

    Context of the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform

    The European contextWith this said, and now looking at the context of the Knowledge, Territory and InnovationPlatform, at a European policy level, first the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs, then the

    Modernisation Agenda for Higher Education, and now the EU2020 strategy for smart,sustainable and inclusive growth have focused their attention on the need to strengthen the‘knowledge triangle’ of research, innovation and education: “Knowledge is the engine for

    sustainable growth. In a fast-changing world, what makes the difference is education andresearch, innovation and creativity”  (European Commission, 2009). This policy focusencompasses improving the quality of education, strengthening research performance, andfostering innovation and technology transfer throughout the European Union.

    To implement the Europe 2020 strategy, the EU flagship initiative Innovation Union andRegional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe 2020 launched the concept of smartspecialization which supports interaction between policymakers, the business sector, highereducation and research institutions at the European level, as well as at the national and

    regional levels.

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    6/15

    September, 2014

    6

    According to Innovation Union, the biggest challenge for the EU and its member states is toadopt a more strategic approach to innovation, whereby innovation becomes an overarchingpolicy objective (Lindqvist, 2012). The aim of the Innovation Union is to:

    -  make Europe into a world-class science performer;-  remove obstacles to innovation –  like expensive patenting, market fragmentation,

    slow standard-setting and skills shortages  –  which currently prevent ideas gettingquickly to market; and

    revolutionize the way public and private sectors work together, notablythrough Innovation Partnerships between the European institutions, national andregional authorities and business.

    To maximize the effectiveness of universities in contributing to regional growth, at anEuropean level, the Directorate General for Regional Policy has prepared a guide “ConnectingUniversities to Regional Growth: A Practical Guide” that provides an analysis of their possiblerole and presents a range of delivery mechanisms. It explores how to overcome barriers, tobuild capacity and to implement partnerships and leadership processes to interconnect thepartners in regional innovation systems.

    The European Union has adopted the Open Innovation theory as one of the importantcomponents for the implementation of the foreseen European Innovation System. Also,according to this theory all stakeholders need to be involved in a Quadruple helix innovationmodel. This model outlines user-oriented innovation models and can create the seamlessinteraction and mash-up for ideas needed in (regional) innovation ecosystems.

    Open Innovation takes full advantage of the cross-fertilization of ideas and drives forexperimentation and prototyping in real world, to speed up and increase the potential forinnovation. It is a catalytic, positive approach for innovation which helps solving key Europeanchallenges by embracing change (Digital Agenda for Europe, 2013).

    According to the Open Innovation 2.0 promoted by the European Commission there are 5 keyelements in the new innovation process:

    -  Networking-  Collaboration involving partners, competitors, universities, and users;- 

    Corporate Entrepreneurship, enhancing corporate venturing, start-ups and spin-offs;- 

    Proactive Intellectual Property Management: to create markets for technology; and-  Research and Development (R&D): to achieve competitive advantages in the market.

    The starting point is the Quadruple Helix innovation model which involves institutional bodies,the research sphere, the business sector, and citizens in the process. This new generation of

    open innovation aims at leading to a stronger economic impact and better user experience inEurope. In this context, universities are seen as suppliers and employers, becoming strategicorganizations with a high impact on regional economy.

    The Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform is, as will be explained in more detail in thecoming sections, an example of Open Innovation aiming at creating the space for cross-fertilization of ideas and increasing the potential for the innovation system in Catalonia.

    The context in CataloniaCatalonia has 7.5 million inhabitants (similar to Switzerland or Denmark), a strong distinctnational and cultural identity and a language of its own. It is a very entrepreneurial society and

    tops all Spanish regions contribution to GDP with almost 19% in 2013, followed by Madrid(18%) and Andalusia (13,5%). This contribution is significant given Catalonia has 16% of the

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    7/15

    September, 2014

    7

    Spanish population and holding a GDP of around 27.000€ per capita, over the Spanish average.Catalonia, together with Madrid and Andalusia, contribute to more than half of the SpanishGDP.

    Business structure of the Catalan economy is, as most western economies, dominated by

    service sector (around 65% contribution to GDP), industry (around 20%), construction (around8%) and agriculture (around 2%). Catalonia has more than 600.000 businesses, out of which99% are SMEs. Almost 50% of these SMEs are micro-SMEs with less than 10 employees, 70% ofthe Catalan workforce is employed in these SMEs.

    The industrial tradition has led to a diversified industrial base, concentrated in medium-lowand medium-high technology sectors. Industry accounts for 19% of the Catalan GDP and has aworkforce of 542.000 professionals. The industrial sector is also based 99% on SMEs.

    While Catalonia is not always the top-performing region in Spain on several innovation-relatedindicators, given its size it accounts for a large share of Spain’s innovation activity and

    resources (OECD, 2010). Catalonia is responsible for 21% of Spanish research and development(R&D) investment and 33.7% of its patents. Catalonia contains 22.5% of Spain’s innovativefirms, a far greater share than other regions, the next highest shares being Madrid (15.6%) andAndalusia (15%) (OECD, 2010). The main weaknesses are related to regulatory issues andrigidities with respect to universities and long-term researcher mobility, the fragmentation ofpublic action (within Catalonia and in co-ordination with programs from other levels ofgovernment), and the lack of innovation culture, as manifested in the lower patenting ratesand R&D intensity relative to other leading regions. Nevertheless, given its scale andperformance, Catalonia is often the largest or second largest recipient region of R&D andinnovation- related programs. Among the region‘s main strengths are its strong researchinfrastructure and regional attractiveness.

    Regarding the human capital structure, Catalan population is distributed as follows: 47% hasprimary (compulsory) education, 22% with secondary education and 31% holds a highereducation level. Nevertheless, unemployment rates in Catalonia are slightly over 20% and over40% among young people from 16 to 24. Even though Catalans with postsecondary educationare less affected by unemployment (11%), it is more than twice the OCDE average (5%). Long-term unemployment already affects half of the unemployed.

    Whilst Catalan economy has strength in its exports (25,3% of Spanish exports and more over14.000 businesses regularly export), the main concern in the Catalan economy for more than15 years now is the need to foster productivity, efficiency and results. This has led to a focuson public policies that encourage human capital, research and innovation efforts for thebenefit of the economy. Needless to say, the last 6 years of financial and economic turmoilhave strongly hit the Catalan economy and public institutions budget’s, specially those focusedon fostering and stimulating innovation.

    Catalonia has a long tradition of active regional government policies to promote its innovationsystem, even before Spain’s integration in the European Union in 1986. The innovation policyapproach has been influenced by many factors such as the European Union policies, thedevolution of competences from the national government to the regions, the political andgovernance context within Catalonia itself and an increasing recognition of the impacts ofresearch and innovation for the economic development, competitiveness and well-being.

    Catalonia’s science and innovation policy over the last two decades has been focused mainlyon improving public research (part of the knowledge generation sub-system). The strategy has

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    8/15

    September, 2014

    8

    followed an academic path given the dominance of academic and research institutions in thepolicies and funding. Over time, the region has had successive research plans that havefocused on providing funding for universities and research centers to incentivize research andinnovation. The first plans focused only on research (1993-96, 1997-2000). From 2001-04, bothresearch and innovation plans were developed. The 2005-08 Plan was the first to include and

    combine science, technology and innovation support in one plan and integrate both supplyand demand side policies.

    The Catalan innovation system has a wide range of innovation actors, many of them created inthe last few years. The Catalan government has provided the necessary support for thecreation of most of these organizations, in some cases to get round rigidities in the currenthigher education system. Other entities have been created with a variety of external financingresources. The multi-level governance framework, with Spanish, Catalan and local actors, aswell as the European Union, is another factor that contributes to the wide range of actorsrelated to innovation. Catalan policy for research and innovation has developed with a goal tomaximize resources from Spanish and European levels through the competitiveness of its

    research assets. Although to a large extent the strategy has focused on research centresoutside universities, the approach in Catalonia has also benefited some universities who havebeen able to generate the capacity to apply for such funds. EU research funding sourcescontinue to increase, however, Spanish funding sources, which had grown considerably in thelast years, are under pressure due to the economic crisis and the recent funding cuts.

    The outputs of these efforts have proven excellent in terms of research results but not so goodin terms of innovation. This fact, and the analysis of its causes, influences the creation of theKnowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform. On the one hand, the system of universities andresearch centers are placed in the fourth position in terms of fundraising of the 7th ResearchFramework Programme, and Catalonia has positioned fourth in the highly competitive grantsfrom the European Research Council. Another example is the production of research papers:Catalonia, with a 1,6% of European population, produces 3% of European papers.

    On the other hand, in terms of innovation, the Innovation Union Scoreboard ranked Catalonia103th in 2010 dropping to 142th position in 2013, of a total of 262 European regions. This isespecially due to the alarming stagnation, if not a decline, of the public support for innovationfor companies. Current transfers and investment in universities are also experiencing a seriousdecline. But it has also to do with structural issues, such as regulation and rigidity of thecurrent university system. For instance, the professional career at the university is based uponresults of research, but collaboration with business in innovation projects is not considered.

    The ministry that administers most of the funding for research and innovation is the Ministryof Economy and Knowledge (formerly Ministry of Innovation, Universities and Enterprise. Thisministry accounted for more than 68% of R&D and innovation related spending in Catalonia.

    Under the ministry level, there are several public entities that play an importantimplementation role in R&D and innovation. Among them:

      ACC1Ó: The result of the merger of the former Centre for Innovation and BusinessDevelopment (CIDEM) and the Consortium for Commercial Promotion of Catalonia(COPCA) which were created in the 1980s. ACC1Ó is the main agency for supportingbusiness development.

      Talència: this organisation has integrated a whole set of funding measures in researchand scientific talent attraction in Catalonia. Until now, these measures were sharedbetween the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR), theCatalan Foundation for Research and Innovation (FCRI) and the Catalan Institution for

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    9/15

    September, 2014

    9

    Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA). ICREA focuses exclusively on talent(researcher) attraction and has been a very successful initiative so far.

    The Catalan government has sponsored the creation of a series of independent researchcentres in the last several years as a vehicle to strengthen the region’s research capabilities.

    These centres are not controlled by the universities, although they involve one or moreCatalan universities as well as other entities. The independence of the centres is reinforced bytheir own legal status, a private management model with external scientific committees, atalent-based recruitment policy allowing for dynamic human resource policies, and sufficientstructural funding and investment in scientific equipment from the regional government.These centres are considered a major contribution to the research and innovationperformance in Catalonia. The results of the Catalan R+D system are specially outstandingbearing in mind that the investment in R+D/GDP ratio is 1,68, far from the Lisbon strategy goalof attaining 3% and far from other reference European regions and countries such as Baden-Württemberg (4,3%) or Finland (3,7%).

    A small comment must also be said on the investment in human capital, another basic elementof an innovation system. Catalan Government investment in public universities is slightly below800 million €, after diminishing for the last few years. Not surprisingly, Spanish overallinvestment in education is 4,7% of the GDP (and descending), while Denmark assigns 7,8% oftheir GDP.

    Efforts to consolidate an innovation system

    Catalan government has produced three research plans (1993-96, 1997-2000) and to researchand innovation plans (2001-04, 2005-08). In 2008 the Catalan Agreement on Research

    Innovation (CARI) was signed and published. The process to develop this agreement activelyinvolved universities in its development. Universities were therefore signatories to theagreement, along with the three political parties in parliament, trade unions and employerassociations. The CARI sets the vision through 2020 of what the region should do through aseries of 131 commitments. Many of these commitments explicitly engage universities to worktowards the objectives set for addressing each of the eight challenges. This agreement sets aprecedent for more active dialogue and clarity with regard to the university role in knowledgeproduction, and increasingly, technology transfer. The process helped to build consensus on avision. The last research plan, the Catalan Research and Innovation Plan 2010-13, is theinstrument to implement the CARI priorities.

    The CARI indicates an increasing need for all public research actors to be held accountable tohigher standards as well as to orient part of their research towards regional needs. The planalso promotes a broader view of innovation - including the role of social sciences and thepublic sector. It also advocates a greater territorial approach, including seven sub-regionswithin Catalonia.

    The next Catalan Research and Innovation Plan 2014-2020 (or Catalunya 2020) will be builtupon the results of the ongoing RIS3 (Research and Innovation Strategies for SmartSpecialisation) process and the ECAT 2020 (Estratègia Catalunya 2020). The latter aims atestablishing the tools for a long-term performance of the competitiveness of the Catalaneconomy and employment. ECAT 2020, inspired by the Europe 2020 Strategy, intends todefine the roadmap to economy recovery preserving the social cohesion model.

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    10/15

    September, 2014

    10

    Another important actor in the innovation context in Catalonia is the Catalan Association ofPublic Universities (ACUP). The eight public universities of Catalonia associated as a universitycooperation that arises as a response to the massification of higher education in the last twodecades and the increasing international competition of the higher education sector. In 2008,ACUP presented the White Paper of the University of Catalonia. This White Paper expresses

    the vision that the Catalan public universities have on their role in and for the Catalan societyand is meant to be an objective in itself. The White Paper consists of eleven chapters, 64strategies and 73 projects to achieve the goals outlined. The rationale behind the White Paper

     for the University of Catalonia is, according to ACUP, the call upon universities to play a pivotalstrategic role in the changing of society and the knowledge economy through three mainchannels: university education, scientific research, innovation and social progress, and last butnot least, collective welfare and competitiveness (ACUP, 2008). This new model proposes thatthe university should be research-intensive and stand at the heart of the scientific,technological and cultural system.

    All in all, the efforts to consolidate an innovation model has gone along with the need to find a

    governance model of the innovation ecosystem. This shows very complex in the Catalancontext:

    Figure 5 R+D+i system in Catalonia (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2010) 

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    11/15

    September, 2014

    11

    The Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform

    Thus, the economic and social context has led in the past few years to an increasing

    participation of higher education institutions in society. This, in turn is due, on the one hand,

    to an urgent necessity for new resources as traditional income sources have been diminishing,

    and, on the other hand, it is also related to the assumption that higher education institutionsneed to enlarge their role in the economic and society spheres. All in all, we might be

    witnessing a changing paradigm in the Catalan university system.

    This turn is expressed in different ways. At this point we will focus on the efforts to consolidate

    an informal structure to bring businesses and universities closer for the benefit of society

    called the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform (Plataforma Coneixement, Territori i

    Innovació).

    First, we should look at the genesis of the Platform for Knowledge, Territory and Innovation. As

    stated above, university rectors created the ACUP in 2002 with the aim of being the voice of

    the universities of Catalonia and combining efforts to promote initiatives, programs and jointprojects with the aim of improving the university system. In 2008 the Presidents of the each

    public university Boards of Trustees  –  Consell Social - (an external advisory board to the

    university representing civil society organizations) were added at the ACUP´s General

    Assembly.

    The creation of the ACUP is in itself a part of this changing paradigm as the need to collaborate

    between universities and society organization became a necessity. Overtime, the role of the

    ACUP has increasing specially in two areas: the promotion of the Catalan universities

    internationally and the analysis and dissemination of the impact of university activity on

    society and the economy of Catalonia.

    In 2009, the ACUP collaborated in the “OCDE - Higher Education in Regional and City

    Development. The Autonomous Region of Catalonia”1. Among other recommendations

    proposed by the OECD advisors, there was a simple though astounding conclusion: there was a

    need to set up a permanent organized space to foster interaction and collaboration between

    businesses and universities to foster social progress, economic competitiveness and the

    cultural vitality of the region. The overall idea was that such interactions would highly enhance

    the creation of coherent system wide policies and initiatives.

    Much is being done in Catalonia presently to overcome economic restrictions and to fostercompetitiveness. Initiatives such as clustering, smart specialization, concentration (facilities

    and institutions), etc. The Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform initiative places itselfin this dynamic system by connecting the university-business-administration and seekssynergies with other organizations and initiatives. The thesis is that much more can be done inorder to transfer the high position of higher education institutions, in terms of research, to theproductive fabric. As seen before, the innovation performance of Catalonia lags far behind inresearch performance.

    The founders of this platform have the conviction that overcoming the current crisis and theformation of a new social and economic scenario will largely depend on the level andcharacteristics of the collaboration between the three major players in the region: industryand business, universities and public administration. This initiative arises, therefore, at a

    1 For full report see: http://www.acup.cat/estudi-ocde 

    http://www.acup.cat/estudi-ocdehttp://www.acup.cat/estudi-ocdehttp://www.acup.cat/estudi-ocdehttp://www.acup.cat/estudi-ocde

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    12/15

    September, 2014

    12

    critical time because the strategies for growth and development made during the ‘good’economic years have faded along with the budgets that made it possible. We know that thiscrisis is changing the economic model although we do not know which will be the next one,but it will certainly require a change of culture and a more social approach by the economy. Inthis sense, the Platform provides the ability to think and act on a social and economic long-

    term strategy for Catalonia.

    The Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform has three main objectives:1.  To promote economic activity and knowledge-intensive innovation;2.  Encourage the exchange of ideas, discussions and to enhance the creation of projects

    between universities, companies and public institutions;3.

     

    To generate initiatives and projects strongly rooted in the needs of Catalonia based onknowledge and innovation.

    The Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform is promoted by the Catalan Association ofPublic Universities (ACUP), the two main employer associations (Foment del Treball Nacional

    and PIMEC) and has the support of some of the main organizations in Catalonia, bothbusinesses and institutions. The Government of Catalonia holds a collaborative role.

    It was officially launched in March 2012 with the first edition of the Jornades Catalunya Futura  – a conference organized for a restricted and by invitation-only group of representatives fromthe industry and business sector, the Rectors and Presidents of Social Councils of the publicuniversities of Catalonia and the invited speakers. The conference ended with the presentationof the Declaration of Poblet which the participants had elaborated during the conference tothe President of the Government of Catalonia.

    Since then the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform has engaged in a number of

    projects and actions that include an international seminar on Knowledge and Innovation, aseries of conferences on knowledge and innovation and is preparing several projects among

    which is a pilot project to connect the needs for innovation of specific companies to the

    expertise of the member universities.

    The methodology and working approach for the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform

    is based on a theme every year that focuses on the links between university and businesses.

    The Jornades Catalunya Futura proposes various approaches to the year theme (first year was

    innovation uptake by firms, and the second year was “labor market and human capital”), so

    the participants can start discussion and elaborate a list of goals, based on consensus upon

    basic issues, that can be achieved through cooperative initiative among business and

    universities.

    Thus, Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform activities are two folded: on the one hand,

    it organizes debates and thinking activities to encourage innovative thinking from a

    cooperation point of view. On the other hand, the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation

    Platform take over its member consensus approaches in order to turn them into strategic and

    collaborative projects.

    The first sphere of activities include benchmarking, seminars and participation in other forums.

    These activities aim at providing a heterodox and cross-boundary landing to the traditional

    debate of university-business cooperation. This includes tackling issues such as dual vocational

    training, industrial Phd, corporate responsibility at the university and business, etc.

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    13/15

    September, 2014

    13

    In the second group of activities, the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform promotes

    and leads strategic projects affecting the whole innovative Catalan system. For instance, the

    set up of an online tool to assist companies when seeking knowledge from university research,

    or supporting corporate venture between university spin-off and large firms. In this set of

    activities, the Knowledge, Territory and Innovation Platform embraces actions to ensure the

    participation in the RIS3 process for Catalonia, deploys resources for improving managerial andentrepreneurial skills among university students, collects and disseminates case studies of

    research cooperation between university and firms, etc.

    Conclusion

    All along this paper we have tried to show a case study on what is being done in order to

    enhance an innovative ecosystem for the sake of economic growth and social development.

    Albeit the Platform for Knowledge, Territory and Innovation is a young initiative, it has proved

    to be a very useful tool to become a spearhead to consolidate an innovative ecosystem. Thiseffort is somehow based in the theoretical frameworks exposed in the first part of the paper.

    To sum up, the Platform for Knowledge, Territory and Innovation is reinforcing the third role of

    the university and bringing all the actors of the innovative system under a single roof. And,

    since this effort has been launched by the Catalan public university system, we aim at scaling

    up the university-business cooperation to achieve strategic partnerships.

    The Platform for Knowledge, Territory and Innovation envisions a new paradigm on the

    university and business link in the Catalan and Spanish context at the forefront of an

    innovation ecosystem. The Catalan and Spanish innovation systems have been traditionally

    based on two distant silos due to the social and historical context. In the last decades, thanks

    to the European research policies, collaboration between the two spheres has dramaticallygrown. But the Platform for Knowledge, Territory and Innovation is an expression that much

    more can be done to increase productivity when bringing university outputs to businesses, and

    to foster the “enterprenurial university”. 

    This new paradigm is based on several a priorities:

      The need to consider every field of the university-business cooperation (project

    research cooperation, knowledge transfer, human capital training…) separately.

    Although all these fields and the overall relationship between university and

    businesses cannot be untied, debate and analysis as isolated concepts can help to

    reach consensus and common initiatives to be put into place.

      Other regions efforts to consolidate the innovation ecosystem are very useful as a

    benchmarking tool but cannot be imported. The Platform for Knowledge, Territory and

    Innovation uses the analysis of best practices in order to enlighten the debate and try

    to search for solutions.

      This new paradigm is being built upon the reflection and analysis of the actual

    situation of the members as well as their participation in the process of definition.

    Thus, it is a live process where new data and insights help to enrich and design new

    activities. For instance, evidence from best practices and studies on the impact of

    Research and Innovation of Catalan Public Universities show the importance of formeruniversity researchers now being in charge of R+D departments in private firms in

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    14/15

    September, 2014

    14

    order to engage cooperation research projects with university research groups. This

    evidence may lead universities to reconnect with these professionals to explore new

    opportunities.

    Nevertheless, the process to shape the Platform for Knowledge, Territory and Innovation is not

    exempt of challenges and difficulties. This is a long-term approach due to the difficulty to alignso many actors in a complex ecosystem, all of them with their own internal procedures,

    context, history and goals, in difficult times for all of them. This proves specially challenging in

    terms of goals settings and managing member expectations. Strategies to tackle challenges

    have proved effective thanks to university system leadership and consistency base on

    consensus upon few basic goals.

    It is our belief that the culture of cooperation is here to stay. There is a belief of its need, there

    is a shared diagnosis and we are working to consolidate a long-term model that brings all

    actors together to implement the tools to make the model possible.

    References

    Associació Catalana d’Universitats Públiques (ACUP). (2010) Impact of the University ofCatalonia on Society . Available from: http://acup.cat/sites/default/files/informe-indicadors-de-recerca-i-innovacio-de-les-universitats-publiques-catalanes-2012.pdf  [23/09/2014]

    Arnkil et al. (2010). Exploring Quadruple Helix Outlining user-oriented innovation models.Työraportteja 85/2010 Working Papers. Available from http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65758/978-951-44-8209-0.pdf?sequence=1 in[23/09/2014]

    Chesbrough, M. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from

    Technology . Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Digital Agenda for Europe. (2013). Open Innovation 2.0 –  A New Paradigm and Foundation for

    a Sustainable Europe. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/node/66731

    [23/09/2014]

    DG Regional Policy. (2011). Connecting Universities to Regional Growth: A Practical Guide.

    Available fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/universities2011/universities

    2011_en.pdf [23/09/2014]

    European Commission. (2009). Commission Working Document Consultation on the Future"EuU2020" Strategy . Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/eu2020.pdf  [23/09/2014]

    European Commision. DG for Education and Culture. (2011). The State of European University‐Business Cooperation. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/education/tools/docs/uni-business-cooperation_en.pdf [23/09/2014]

    Generalitat de Catalunya. (2010). Pla de Recerca i Innovació de Catalunya 2010-2013. Availablefrom:

    http://acup.cat/sites/default/files/informe-indicadors-de-recerca-i-innovacio-de-les-universitats-publiques-catalanes-2012.pdfhttp://acup.cat/sites/default/files/informe-indicadors-de-recerca-i-innovacio-de-les-universitats-publiques-catalanes-2012.pdfhttp://acup.cat/sites/default/files/informe-indicadors-de-recerca-i-innovacio-de-les-universitats-publiques-catalanes-2012.pdfhttp://acup.cat/sites/default/files/informe-indicadors-de-recerca-i-innovacio-de-les-universitats-publiques-catalanes-2012.pdfhttp://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65758/978-951-44-8209-0.pdf?sequence=1https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/node/66731https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/node/66731http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/universities2011/universities2011_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/universities2011/universities2011_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/eu2020.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/eu2020.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/eu2020.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/education/tools/docs/uni-business-cooperation_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/education/tools/docs/uni-business-cooperation_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/education/tools/docs/uni-business-cooperation_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/education/tools/docs/uni-business-cooperation_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/eu2020.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/universities2011/universities2011_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/universities2011/universities2011_en.pdfhttps://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/node/66731http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65758/978-951-44-8209-0.pdf?sequence=1http://acup.cat/sites/default/files/informe-indicadors-de-recerca-i-innovacio-de-les-universitats-publiques-catalanes-2012.pdfhttp://acup.cat/sites/default/files/informe-indicadors-de-recerca-i-innovacio-de-les-universitats-publiques-catalanes-2012.pdf

  • 8/17/2019 “a Network That Responds to a Complex Innovation

    15/15

    September, 2014

    15

    http://pricatalunya.gencat.cat/web/sites/pricatalunya/.content/home/minisites/pricatalunya/pri_2010-2013/docs/pri_2010_13_cat.pdf  [23/09/2014] 

    Gibbons, M. et al. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge;The Dynamics of Science and

    Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

    Lindqvist, M. (2012). The Roles of Universities in Regional Development. Nordregio News Issue

    2. Available from http://www.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/Issue-22012/The-

    Roles-of-Universities-in-Regional-Development/ [23/09/2014] 

    Tödtling, F. (2006). The role of universities in innovation systems and regional economies.

    Expert meeting on The future of academic research Vienna, 19-20 October, 2006. Available

    from http://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/37592074.pdf  [23/09/2014]

    Vilalta, J.M. coord. (2010) . Using The Economic Crisis As An Opportunity For

    Engaging Universities In Regional Development. Background Report. Available athttp://www.acup.cat/sites/default/files/eu-drivers-anual-report-final.pdf  [23/09/2014]

    http://pricatalunya.gencat.cat/web/sites/pricatalunya/.content/home/minisites/pricatalunya/pri_2010-2013/docs/pri_2010_13_cat.pdfhttp://pricatalunya.gencat.cat/web/sites/pricatalunya/.content/home/minisites/pricatalunya/pri_2010-2013/docs/pri_2010_13_cat.pdfhttp://pricatalunya.gencat.cat/web/sites/pricatalunya/.content/home/minisites/pricatalunya/pri_2010-2013/docs/pri_2010_13_cat.pdfhttp://www.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/Issue-22012/The-Roles-of-Universities-in-Regional-Development/http://www.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/Issue-22012/The-Roles-of-Universities-in-Regional-Development/http://www.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/Issue-22012/The-Roles-of-Universities-in-Regional-Development/http://www.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/Issue-22012/The-Roles-of-Universities-in-Regional-Development/http://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/37592074.pdfhttp://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/37592074.pdfhttp://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/37592074.pdfhttp://www.acup.cat/sites/default/files/eu-drivers-anual-report-final.pdfhttp://www.acup.cat/sites/default/files/eu-drivers-anual-report-final.pdfhttp://www.acup.cat/sites/default/files/eu-drivers-anual-report-final.pdfhttp://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/37592074.pdfhttp://www.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/Issue-22012/The-Roles-of-Universities-in-Regional-Development/http://www.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/Issue-22012/The-Roles-of-Universities-in-Regional-Development/http://pricatalunya.gencat.cat/web/sites/pricatalunya/.content/home/minisites/pricatalunya/pri_2010-2013/docs/pri_2010_13_cat.pdfhttp://pricatalunya.gencat.cat/web/sites/pricatalunya/.content/home/minisites/pricatalunya/pri_2010-2013/docs/pri_2010_13_cat.pdf