A National Perspective on the

30

Transcript of A National Perspective on the

Page 1: A National Perspective on the
Page 2: A National Perspective on the

A National Perspective on the

Property Tax: How Montana

ComparesDaphne A. Kenyon, Ph.D., Resident Fellow in Tax Policy, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

Bethany P. Paquin, Senior Research Analyst, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

Montana’s Financial Modernization and Risk Analysis Study Committee (MARA)Monday, November 29, 2021

Page 3: A National Perspective on the

The Lincoln Institute of

Land Policy seeks to

improve quality of life

through the effective

use, taxation, and

stewardship of land

3

About the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

Page 4: A National Perspective on the

• A nonprofit private operating foundation whose

origins date to 1946, the Lincoln Institute

researches and recommends creative approaches

to land as a solution to economic, social, and

environmental challenges

• Through education, training, publications, and

events, we integrate theory and practice to inform

public policy decisions worldwide

• The Lincoln Institute has offices in Cambridge,

Phoenix, Washington, DC, and Beijing

About the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

Page 5: A National Perspective on the

Outline

• How Montana’s Property Tax Structure Compares to

Other States

• Key Findings from “Effects of Reducing the Role of

the Local Property Tax in Funding K-12 Education” by

Daphne A. Kenyon and Semida Munteanu

• Introduction to Property Tax Relief for Homeowners by

Adam H. Langley and Joan Youngman

Page 6: A National Perspective on the

6

Distinctive Features of Montana’s

Property Tax System

• Since Montana does not levy a broad-based sales tax,

local governments in Montana rely more heavily on

the property tax than the U.S. average

• Montana is one of only two states in which the state

government appraises property

• Montana has a complex classification system which

imposes a 100 percent assessment ratio on mines

but a 1.35 percent assessment ratio for residential

property

Page 7: A National Perspective on the

7

Sources of Local General Revenue, Montana and U.S., 2018

Source: U.S. Census via Significant Features of the Property Tax

U.S. 5%

U.S. 18%

U.S. 4%

U.S. 31%

U.S. 2%

U.S. 3%

U.S. 7%

U.S. 30%

MT 6%

MT 17%

MT 6%

MT 32%

MT 1%

MT 0%

MT 0%

MT 37%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Other Own Source Revenue

Charges

Federal Aid

State Aid

Other Tax

Income Tax

Sales Tax

Property Tax

Page 8: A National Perspective on the

Montana U.S. AverageRank (of 51)1 is highest

Per capita property tax $1,698 $1,667 16

Property tax percentage of personal income 3.6% 3.1% 14

Total property tax as percentage of state-local revenue 18.5% 16.6% 16

Median owner-occupied home value2 $230,600 $217,500 19

Median real estate taxes paid for owner-occupied home2 $1,928 $2,471 27

Effective tax rate, median owner-occupied home3 0.8% 1.1% 32

Sources: U.S. Census via Significant Features of the Property Tax, American Community Survey

Selected Montana Property Tax Statistics, 2018

Page 9: A National Perspective on the

Feature Montana Count for 50 states plus DC

Statewide classification of real property

Yes 25

Assessment of property primarily by county

No 31

Limits on property tax rates or levies

Yes 45

Limits on the rate of growth of assessed value

No 18

Circuit breaker property tax relief program

Yes 34

Property Tax Features of State Governments, Montana, 2018

Source: Significant Features of the Property Tax via State-by-State Property Tax at a Glance

Page 10: A National Perspective on the

Homestead Effective Property Tax Rate, Montana, U.S. Average, and Selected States, 2020

Source: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence

0.93%

1.38%

0.72%

1.20%

1.53%

0.64%

0.00%

0.20%

0.40%

0.60%

0.80%

1.00%

1.20%

1.40%

1.60%

1.80%

Montana(Billings)Rank 39

U.S. Average Idaho(Boise)Rank 44

North Dakota(Fargo)Rank 29

South Dakota(Sioux Falls)

Rank 16

Wyoming(Cheyenne)

Rank 48

Page 11: A National Perspective on the

State-Imposed Property Tax Limits

All but three states limit local property taxation in one of three ways:

• Rate Limit: A legal limit on property tax rates so that they are either frozen or tied to an index or formula.

• Levy Limit: A legal limit on the amount of revenue raised by the property tax or on the rate of growth in property tax revenues.

• Assessment Limit: A legal limit on annual increases in assessed values that either freezes such values or ties increases to an index or formula

Page 12: A National Perspective on the

Rate or levy limits apply in 45 states

Source: State-by-State Property Tax at a Glance

Page 13: A National Perspective on the

Assessment limits apply in 32 states

Source: State-by-State Property Tax at a Glance

Page 14: A National Perspective on the

Key Findings from “Effects of Reducing

the Role of the Local Property Tax in

Funding K-12 Education”

Page 15: A National Perspective on the

U.S. State and Local Property, General Sales, and Individual

Income Tax Revenue 1977 to 2018, Real 2018$ (in

thousands)

$0

$100,000,000

$200,000,000

$300,000,000

$400,000,000

$500,000,000

$600,000,000

19

77

19

79

19

81

19

83

19

85

19

87

19

89

19

91

19

93

19

95

19

97

19

99

20

01

20

03

20

05

20

07

20

09

20

11

20

13

20

15

20

17

Property Tax General Sales Tax Individual Income Tax

Page 16: A National Perspective on the

What Makes the Property Tax Stable?

1. Property values less sensitive to changes in income and

employment rates than retail sales, personal income, and

business profits.

2. Assessment lags – assessments are backward looking;

revaluation cycles range from annual to 6 years

3. Local governments have ability to change tax rates on an

annual basis, increasing tax rates when property values

fall (and vice versa)

Page 17: A National Perspective on the

School Spending During Recessions

• 47% of school spending in the US comes from state funding

(state aid); 37% from local property taxes

• State aid comes mostly from income and sales taxes, extremely

responsive to economic fluctuations

• State governments have balanced budget requirements – when

state revenues fall, they must increase taxes or cut spending

• Property tax serves as backstop during recessions – local school

districts increase property taxes to offset state aid cuts (Dye

and Reschovsky, 2008)

• During last three recessions, state aid declined, and local

property tax share increased in the aggregate

Page 18: A National Perspective on the

State Aid and Local Property Tax Share of U.S. K-12

Education Revenues, FY1989-FY2018

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

Recession State Sources Local Property Tax

Page 19: A National Perspective on the

• An early “tax swap” state

• Proposal A enacted in 1994

• Cut property taxes

• Replaced lost revenue with revenue

raised by a sales tax increase

Michigan

Page 20: A National Perspective on the

• Very restrictive property tax limits

• Complicated set of property tax rate

limits

• Tight assessment limit

• Strict levy limit

Michigan

Page 21: A National Perspective on the

Michigan State Aid and Local Property Tax Share of

K-12 Education Revenues

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

Recession State Aid Local Property Tax

Page 22: A National Perspective on the

• Reliance on the local property tax makes

school funding more stable in recessions

• The ability of the local property tax to

support K-12 education over the business

cycle can be hampered by stringent state-

imposed property tax limits

Key Conclusions of Study

Page 23: A National Perspective on the

Introduction to Property Tax Relief for

Homeowners by Adam H. Langley and

Joan Youngman

Page 24: A National Perspective on the
Page 25: A National Perspective on the

Report Recommendations

Page 26: A National Perspective on the

Sources

Property Tax Relief for Homeowners (2021)

by Adam H. Langley and Joan Youngman

www.lincolninst.edu/publications/policy-focus-reports/property-

tax-relief-homeowners

Introduction to the Property Tax

www.lincolninst.edu/introduction-property-tax

• “Property Tax 101: Why the Property Tax” (2020)

• “Property Tax 101: The Mechanics” (2020)

• “Property Taxes: What Everybody Needs to Know” by Ronald

C. Fisher (2021)

Page 27: A National Perspective on the

“Effects of Reducing the Role of the Local Property Tax in Funding

K-12 Education” by Daphne A. Kenyon and Semida Munteanu

in Recent Advancements in Education Finance and Policy, ed.

Thomas Downes and Kieran Killeen, forthcoming, 2022

Sources

Page 28: A National Perspective on the

State-by-State Property Tax at a Glance Narratives and

Visualization Tool

www.lincolninst.edu/research-data/data-toolkits/significant-

features-property-tax/state-state-property-tax-glance/property-tax-

data-visualization

This data toolkit presents information on property tax systems in the 50

states and the District of Columbia. An interactive map allows users to

easily view and compare key property tax statistics among states.

Companion tables and charts display numerical values for key property

tax system variables for each state, DC, and the U.S.

Sources

Page 29: A National Perspective on the

50-State Property Tax Comparison Study (2021)

www.lincolninst.edu/sites/default/files/pubfiles/50-state-property-

tax-comparison-for-2020-full_0.pdf

Sources

The Property Tax-School Funding Dilemma

by Daphne A. Kenyon (2007)

www.lincolninst.edu/publications/policy-focus-

reports/property-tax-school-funding-dilemma

Update forthcoming 2022:

“The Property Tax-School Funding Dilemma” by

Daphne A. Kenyon, Andrew Reschovsky, and

Bethany P. Paquin

Page 30: A National Perspective on the

30

Daphne A. Kenyon

[email protected]

Bethany P. Paquin

[email protected]

113 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 LINCOLNINST.EDU @LANDPOLICY

Thank you!