©2005, Lee Iverson Lee Iverson UBC Dept. of ECE EECE 478 Viewing and Projection.
A multi-model approach to predicting emerald ash borer ......2019/10/04 · Bendor et al. 2006;...
Transcript of A multi-model approach to predicting emerald ash borer ......2019/10/04 · Bendor et al. 2006;...
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
A multi-model approach to predicting emerald ash borer infestations
Kishan Sambaraju, Kathryn Powell, Robert Lavallée, and André Beaudoin
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada
6 September 2019
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
2
Emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis
• Buprestid beetle of east Asian origin
• Metallic green in colour, rice-grain shaped, ~14 mm long
• Detected in North America in 2002
• Probably introduced via imported wood packing or crating materials
• Attacks and kills all North American ash species (Fraxinus spp.)
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
• EAB is presently found in 5 Canadian provinces and 35 states in the U.S.
www.emeraldashborer.info Canadian Food Inspection Agency
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
• Found in Moscow, Russia in 2003; potential for spread throughout Europe’s ash range
Musolin et al. (2017). Between ash dieback and emerald ash borer: Two Asian invaders in Russia and the future of ash in Europe. Baltic Forestry. 23: 316-333.
Valenta et al. (2015). A high-resolution map of emerald ash borer invasion risk for southern central Europe. Forests 2015, 6: 3075-3086.
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
EAB life cycle
Image credit: Egg - Houping Liu, Michigan State University, Bugwood.org; Larvae - David Cappaert, Bugwood.org
Egg Larvae Adult
June – August (t0) July (t0) – May (t0 + 1 yr) May – Sep (t0 + 1 yr)
June – August (t0) July (t0) – May (t0 + 2 yr) May – Sep (t0 + 2 yr)
May (t0 + 1 yr)
May (t0 + 2 yr)
PupaNRCan
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Tree damage
Eric R. Day, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
7
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Slowing the spread of EAB
Houping Liu, MSU, Bugwood.org
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
9
Contributing factors of rapid expansion and survival
• Human-mediated transport of firewood
• Active dispersal of beetles
• Adults mainly colonize trees at distances of
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
• Not just humans, EAB will appreciate some warm winter weather!!
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Muirhead et al 2006 Local and long-distance dispersalBendor et al. 2006; Bendor and Metcalf 2006 Dynamic-spatial modeling of EAB spread
Iverson et al. 2010; Prasad et al. 2010 Various models – active and passive dispersalSobek-Swant et al. 2012 Ecological niche modeling (climate-only)
Huset 2013 (unpublished thesis) Active, passive dispersal , topography + climate factors (western New York)Vermunt et al. 2012; DeSantis et al. 2013; Cuddington et al. 2018; MacQuarrie et al. 2019
Under-bark temperature and over-winteringmortality
Yemshanov et al. 2012, Yemshanov et al. 2015; Yemshanov et al. 2019
Uncertainty and likelihood of establishment; spread rates; sampling strategies
Zhang et al. 2014 Remote sensing-based analysis
Anderson and Dragicevic 2016Geospatial modeling taking into account active, passive dispersal + climate factors (Windsor, Ontario, Canada)
Orlova‐Bienkowskaja and Bieńkowskii 2018 Kernel-based and pair-wise distance methods
EAB modelling literature
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Ensembles vs. Individual models
• Multiple modelling algorithms are present. Which one to use?
• Predictive capacity will differ significantly from one model to the other.
• Individual models may not perform well in a new area or in a different time.
• Using an ensemble approach we can:
• Combine predictions from different model types.
• Identify variables of highest relative importance.
• Reduce uncertainty in predictions.
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Objectives
• Study the associations between EAB occurrences and potential drivers of infestations.
• Evaluate multiple modeling algorithms and assess their performances in predicting EAB infestations.
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
EAB trap collection data
• Trap capture data were collected from many different sources (2002-2018)
• Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)• Provincial agencies and city managers
(e.g., Ottawa, Oakville, Quebec City, Toronto)
• Pest management companies (GDG, BioForest)
• Branch sampling data, where available
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
EAB data collection points
% Treed,% Broad-leaf
Latitude, longitude, topography
Climate-related predictors
Campsites, road length, pop. density, rail, parks
n = 19011
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
• Passive dispersal: Human population density, road length, #campsites, percentage area consisting of parks, # rail stations, rail track length.
• Positional and topographic: Latitude, longitude, elevation, slope, aspect.
• Vegetation-based: Mean percent treed biomass, mean percent broad-leaf biomass, as proxies for ash tree distribution (Beaudoin et al. 2011).
• Climate-based: Degree days ≥ 10°C; coldest quarter mean temperature (°C); warmest quarter water deficit (mm); annual water deficit (mm); coldest quarter total precipitation (mm).
Non-climatic and climate-based predictors
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Ensemble models
• R package Biomod2, 10-fold cross-validation• Generalized linear model (GLM), Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS); Artificial neural networks (ANN), Flexible
discriminant analysis (FDA), Classification tree analysis (CTA); Maximum entropy (MAXENT), Generalized boosting models, (GBM), Random forest (RF), and Surface range envelope (SRE).
• Used unweighted and weighted mean probabilities from nine models to derive ensemble predictions.
• Compared performances of individual models with the ensemble model.
• Area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC)• True skill statistic (TSS)
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
-51.9
-72.5
-48.7
-4.8
-523.4
-80.7
-148.9
-14.6
-4.4
-44.5
-50.1
-450.4
-715.1
-800 -600 -400 -200 0
% Broad-leaf 2011 (-)
% Treed 2011 (-)
S->N Aspect (-)
Slope (-)
Elevation (-)
Longitude (+)
Latitude (-)
Parks (-)
Rail track length (+)
Rail stations (+)
# Campsites (-)
Road length (+)
Pop. density (+)
AIC VALUE COMPARED WITH THE INTERCEPT-ONLY MODEL
PRED
ICTO
RS O
F EA
B PR
ESEN
CENon-climatic predictors
Mean percent broad-leaf biomass (Beaudoin et al. 2011)
𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑃𝑃 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 = 1 = 𝛽𝛽0 + 𝛽𝛽1𝑥𝑥; AIC: Akaike Information Criterion
Mean percent treed biomass (Beaudoin et al. 2011)
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Accumulated degree days ≥ 10°C
Warmest month mean temperature (°C)
Coldest quarter mean temperature (°C)
Warmest quarter water deficit (mm)
Climate-based predictors
-2.6
-96.7
-103.4
-171.1
-901.6
-1000 -900 -800 -700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0
CQTP (+)
AWD (+)
WQWD (+)
CQMT (+)
DD ≥ 10°C (+)
DECREASE IN AIC VALUE COMPARED WITH THE INTERCEPT-ONLY MODEL
CLIM
ATE-
BASE
D PR
EDIC
TORS
OF
EAB
PRES
ENCE
Annual water deficit (mm)
Coldest quarter total precipitation (mm)
𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑃𝑃 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 = 1 = 𝛽𝛽0 + 𝛽𝛽1𝑥𝑥; AIC: Akaike Information Criterion
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Individual models
Generalized linear model (GLM), Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS); Artificial neural networks (ANN), Flexible discriminant analysis (FDA), Classification tree analysis (CTA); Maximum entropy (MAXENT), Generalized boosting models, (GBM), Random forest (RF), and Surface range envelope (SRE).
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Ensemble versus individual models
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
ANNCTAFDA
GBMGLM
MARSMAXENT
RFSRE
Ensemble
AUC-ROC
Generalized linear model (GLM), Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS); Artificial neural networks (ANN), Flexible discriminant analysis (FDA), Classification tree analysis (CTA); Maximum entropy (MAXENT), Generalized boosting models, (GBM), Random forest (RF), and Surface range envelope (SRE).
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Ensemble versus individual models
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
ANN
CTA
FDA
GBM
GLM
MARS
MAXENT
RF
SRE
Ensemble
TSS
Generalized linear model (GLM), Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS); Artificial neural networks (ANN), Flexible discriminant analysis (FDA), Classification tree analysis (CTA); Maximum entropy (MAXENT), Generalized boosting models, (GBM), Random forest (RF), and Surface range envelope (SRE).
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Summary• We assessed associations of relevant predictors with EAB distribution in Canada.
• Non-climatic variables included demographic, topographic, and vegetation-based variables.
• Ecologically-relevant weather variables included those that could influence EAB development and survival, and stress trees.
• Predictions varied among individual models.
• Ensemble models performed better than individual models.
• Accumulated degree days (≥ 10°C), elevation, annual water deficit, and human population density were strongly associated with EAB presence.
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Acknowledgements
CFIAMireille MarcotteRon Neville
GDGRéjean BergevinChristian BrousseauMarie-Ève Lajoie
NRCan-CFSRémi Saint-AmantEAB team-LFCChris MacQuarrieBrian Van HezewijkPhilippe Villemaire
BioForestCraig AllisonÉtienne Papineau
Univ. de Québec en OutaouaisFrançois Lorenzetti
Novascotia Department of Lands and ForestryCelia Boone
Camping QuébecJean Lessard
Statistics Canada
City of TorontoJozef Ric
City of OttawaJason Pollard
Ville de QuébecJérôme Picard
City of WinnipegKerienne LaFrance
Québec Wood ExportBruno Couture
-
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017
Thank you!
Questions, comments, or suggestions?
A multi-model approach to predicting emerald ash borer infestationsSlide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25