› klimos › klimos-seminars › 20150504... · Environmental impacts of biofuel...
Transcript of › klimos › klimos-seminars › 20150504... · Environmental impacts of biofuel...
Environmental impacts of
biofuel projects
How to analyze/evaluate?
Wouter Achten
KLIMOS Seminar, BXL
4th May 2015
Why biofuels?
Singer et al., 2011
• Do they meet objectives, goals, claims?
• Which are the trade-offs? Are there
sustainability/environmental impacts related to achieving
these goals?
Why to evaluate them?
• Principles, Criteria & Indicators
• Life cycle assessment
How to evaluate biofuels?
• Footprinting
• But also, cost-benefit analysis, EIA, social impact assessment, …
• To get to know the conceptual working of these methods
• Influence of methodological choices
Objectives
• Limits and weaknesses of these methods, and current
developments
Principles, Criteria and Indiactors
Principles, Criteria and Indicators
Goal:Sustainable Forest Management
Principle:The productive function of the forest shall be maintained
Criterion:
Verifier:Penetrograph measurements
Criterion:Harvesting operations respect the soil (yes/no)
Indicator:Soil compaction
Norm:Penetration resistance within the forest stands < 200N/cm²
Principles, Criteria and Indicators
Principle - an accepted fundamental rule of sustainable
develoment. It is formulated as a commandment (e.g. The
protection function shall be maintained, and where appropriate,
enhanced)
Criterion describes the state of the system under compliance
with a principle. It is formulated to allow a verdict (e.g. Soil erosion with a principle. It is formulated to allow a verdict (e.g. Soil erosion
is minimized)
Indicator is a variable indicating the level of compliance with
a criterion
Norm or Threshold is a well-defined indicator value setting the
boundary between compliance and non-compliance to a criterion
Verifier is a tool or instrument to measure an indicator
Example RSB
• Principle 1 – Legality
• Principle 2 – Planning, Monitoring and Continuous Improvement
• Principle 3 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Principle 4 – Human and Labor Rights
• Principle 5 – Rural and Social Development
• Principle 6 – Local Food Security
• Principle 7 – Conservation
• Principle 8 – Soil
• Principle 9 – Water
• Principle 10 – Air
• Principle 11 – Use of Technology, Inputs, and Management of Waste
• Principle 12 – Land Rights
RSB – Principle 4 Human and Labor Rights
Principle – Biofuel operations shall not violate human rights or labor rights, and shall promote decent work and the well-being of workers
• Criterion 4a - Workers shall enjoy freedom of association, the right to organize, and the right to collectively bargain.
• Criterion 4b – No slave labor or forced labor shall occur
• Criterion 4 c – No child labor shall occur, except on family farms and then only when work does not interferre with the child’s schooling and does not put his or her health at risk
• Criterion 4d – Workers shall be free of discrimination of any kind, whether in employment or opportunity, with respect to gender, wages, working conditions and social benefits.
• …
RSB - Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Principle – Biomass and biomaterials shall contribute to climatechange mitigation by significantly reducing lifecycle GHG emissions as compared to fossil fuels
Criterion 3a – Complience to local policies, regulations and targets
Criterion 3b – Lifecycle GHG emissions shall be calculated the using the RSB method
Criterion 3 c – Biofuel blends shall have on average 50% lowerlife cycle greenhous gas emission relative to the fossil fuel baseline
RSB - Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Principle – Biomass and biomaterials shall contribute to climatechnge mitigation by significantly reducing lifecycle GHG emission
as compared to fossil fuels
Criterion 3a – Compliance to local policies, regulations and targets
Criterion 3b – Lifecycle GHG emission shall be calculated the using the RSB method
Criterion 3 c – Biofuel blends shall have on average 50% lowerlife cycle greenhous gas emission relative to the fossil fuel baseline
EU Renewable energy Directive 2009
Sustainability criteria:
« The greenhouse gas emission saving from the use of biofuels
and bioliquids […] shall be at least 35% »
« With the effect from 1 Januari 2017, the greenhouse gas
emission saving […] shall be at least 50% »
« From 1 January 2018 that greenhouse gas emission saving shall
be at least 60% »
EU Renewable energy Directive 2009
Biofuel life cycle
By-products
CO2
Oil extraction
Biodiesel production
CO2
CO2
ECO2
CO2
Biodiesel productionCO2
CO2
E
E
E
E
Life cycle assessment
LCA is a technique to quantify environmental impacts
associated to the complete life cycle of a product or function
Life cycle analysis
Ecobalance
Cradle to grave analysis
Life cycle approach
Life cycle assessment
LCA is a technique to quantify environmental impacts
associated to the complete life cycle of a product or
function
- Energy requirement
- Global warming potential
- Water use
- Eutrophication potential
- Acidification potential
- Ozone layer depletion
- …
Life cycle assessment
LCA is a technique to quantify environmental impacts
associated to the complete life cycle of a product or
function
Why LCA?
• Calculate the energy/environmental profile/impact of products and/or production systems
• Compare the environmental performance of products and product systems
• Identify optimization options in the production system
• Policy recommandations
• Strategic planning
• Marketing
• Consumer awareness
• Product composition/design
How does it basically work?
Cultivation
Fresh Fruit Bunches
Agricultural land
Inputs Outputs
Fertilizer
Land area
Field operations
Field emissions
Describe your system
Extraction
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Crude Palm Oil
Refinery
Stearin
POME
Biodiesel
Field operations
Infrastructure
Machines
Energy
Methanol
By-products
Waste water
Products
How does it basically work?
Cultivation
Fresh Fruit Bunches
Agricultural land
Inputs Outputs
Fertilizer
Land area
Field operations
Field emissions CO2
SO2
Inventory inputs and outputs
Extraction
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Crude Palm Oil
Refinery
Stearin
POME
Biodiesel
Field operations
Infrastructure
Machines
Energy
Methanol
By-products
Waste water
Products
N2O
MJ
PO4
CH4
…
How does it basically work?
Inventory inputs and outputs
Cultivation
Fresh Fruit Bunches
Agricultural land
CO2
SO2
Global warming
potential
(CO eq)
1×
Impact assessment
Extraction
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Crude Palm Oil
Refinery
Stearin
POME
Biodiesel
N2O
MJ
PO4
CH4
…
Energy use
(CO2eq)
297×
23×
How does it basically work?
Jatropha versus Oil Palm
Cultivation
Reference system
System boundary expansion
Seeds
Crude fossil oil
SubstitutionBy-products
Oil extraction
Biomass waste
wasteland
Palm Kernel Meal + animal feed
Palm Kernel Meal
Cultivation
Extraction
Fresh Fruit Bunches
Crude POME
Extraction
Agricultural landSystem boundary expansion
Substitution
Jatropha in India Oil palm in Cameroon
By-products
Achten et al. (2010) LCAinFood
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Glycerine
Fossil Diesel
Crude Jatropha Oil
Engine combustion
BiodieselGlycerine
Seed cake
feed
Crude Palm Oil
Glycerine
Olein + Free Fatty Acids
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Crude Palm Oil
Refinery
Stearin
Biodiesel
Processing
Glycerine
Palm Kernel Oil + Alcohol Ethoxylates
Palm Kernel Oil
Jatropha versus Oil Palm
LCA Methodological Choices
• Funtional unit
• Impact category
• System boundaries
• Allocation procedure
LCA Methodological Choices
Functional UnitGlobal warming potential of electricity production from short
rotation coppice
800
1200
1600
ton
CO
2-e
q./
ha
/10
0jr
wilg
Miscanthus 0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
ton C
O2-e
q./GJpro
d
Bio
ma
ss
& B
ion
ere
gy,
20
03
-400
0
400
emissie productsysteem
(per ha)
emissie
referentiesysteem (per
ha)
vermeden
broeikasgasemissie (per
ha)
ton
CO
2-e
q./
ha
/10
0jr
Miscanthus
hakhoutfk
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
vermeden
broeikasgasemissie (per
geproduceerde GJ)
ton C
O2-e
q./GJpro
d
•Performance on a ha basis (figure left) differs from the one on an
energetic basis
•Show result using different functional units?
•Which question do you want to answer?
Le
tte
ns
et
al., B
iom
ass
LCA Methodological Choices
Impact categories
Cultivation
Reference system
System boundary expansion
Seeds
Crude fossil oil
SubstitutionBy-products
Oil extraction
Biomass waste
wasteland
Palm Kernel Meal + animal feed
Palm Kernel Meal
Cultivation
Extraction
Fresh Fruit Bunches
Crude POME
Extraction
Agricultural landSystem boundary expansion
Substitution
Jatropha in India Oil palm in Cameroon
By-products
Achten et al. (2010) LCAinFood
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Glycerine
Fossil Diesel
Crude Jatropha Oil
Engine combustion
BiodieselGlycerine
Seed cake
feed
Crude Palm Oil
Glycerine
Olein + Free Fatty Acids
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Crude Palm Oil
Refinery
Stearin
Biodiesel
Processing
Glycerine
Palm Kernel Oil + Alcohol Ethoxylates
Palm Kernel Oil
LCA Methodological Choices
Impact categories
LCA Methodological Choices
System boundaries
Cultivation
Extraction
Fresh Fruit Bunches
Agricultural land
Inputs Outputs
Fertilizer
Land area
Field operations
Field emissions
Waste waterExtraction
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Crude Palm Oil
Refinery
Stearin
POME
Biodiesel
Infrastructure
Machines
Energy
Methanol
By-products
Waste water
Products
LCA Methodological Choices
System boundaries
Fargione et al. 2008
Science
LCA Methodological Choices
Allocation procedure
Mass allocation
Energy allocation
Economic allocation
Avoid allocation through
Cultivation
Extraction
Fresh Fruit Bunches
Agricultural land
Inputs Outputs
Fertilizer
Land area
Field operations
Field emissions
Waste waterAvoid allocation through
Substitution
Extraction
Transesterification
Engine combustion
Crude Palm Oil
Refinery
Stearin
POME
Biodiesel
Infrastructure
Machines
Energy
Methanol
By-products
Products
LCA Methodological Choices
Allocation procedure
Total mass products:
7 + 2 = 9
Burden allocation to
Flour: 7/9 = 78%,
Bran: 2/9 = 22%
Wheat cultivation
Wheat milling
Wheat flour fractionation
Fertilizer, pesticides,
herbicides
Field operations
Water
Mill
Energy
Mixer
Centrifuge
Water (16.74 l)
Infrastructure
Field emissions
Bran (2 kg)
Leaching
Waste water
Land area
Grains (10 kg)
Flour (7 kg)
Wet gluten (3 kg)
Wet A-starch (7 kg)
Wet B-starch (10 kg)
Adapted from Achten et al., SAM7, 2012
Drying glutenInfrastructure
Energy
Wet B-starch (10 kg)
Gluten powder (1 kg)
Compression molding
Composting
Infrastructure
Energy
Infrastructure
EnergyN fertilizer
Glassy gluten bioplastic (1 kg)
flour: € 0.8/kg,
bran: € 0.15/kg
Total value of ouput:
(7*0. 8)+(2*0.15)=
€ 5.9
Allocation factor:
Wheat cultivation
Wheat milling
Wheat flour fractionation
Fertilizer, pesticides,
herbicides
Field operations
Water
Mill
Energy
Mixer
Centrifuge
Water (16.74 l)
Field emissions
Bran (2 kg)
Leaching
Waste water
Land area
Grains (10 kg)
Flour (7 kg)
Wet gluten (3 kg)
Wet A-starch (7 kg)
Adapted from Achten et al., SAM7, 2012
Allocation factor:
Flour: (7*0.8)/5.9=
95%
Bran: (2*0.15)/ 5.9=
5%
Drying glutenInfrastructure
Energy
Wet A-starch (7 kg)
Wet B-starch (10 kg)
Gluten powder (1 kg)
Compression molding
Composting
Infrastructure
Energy
Infrastructure
EnergyN fertilizer
Glassy gluten bioplastic (1 kg)
LCA Methodological Choices
Allocation procedure
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
Climate change
Terrestrial acidificationFossil depletion
Mass allocation
Economic allocation
0
0,2
Freshwater eutrophication
Marine eutrophication
Agricultural land occupation
Achten et al., SAM7, 2012
Limits and Weaknesses of LCA
• No land use change impacts on land quality or ecosystem
services
Impact on land quality
Waste land � Jatropha Agriculture � Oil palm Forest � Oil palm
Impact of direct land use change and land use occupation
Area×Time per FU =
412 m²yr
Area×Time per FU =
350 m²yr
Limits and Weaknesses of LCA
(and current developments)
• No land use change impacts on land quality or ecosystem
services
• Static
Limits and Weaknesses of LCA
(and current developments)
• No land use change impacts on land quality or ecosystem
services
• Static
• Generic in time and space
Regionalization
Repayment time of carbon debt by selling
seeds after one time investment (years) N.A.no GHG reduction10 - 1516 - 3031 - 6061 - 100101 - 941
100 0 100 200 KilometersN
Limits and Weaknesses of LCA
(and current developments)
• No land use change impacts on land quality or ecosystem
services
• Static
• Generic in time and space
• Focus on environmental impacts
Life cycle thinking
Social LCALife Cycle Assessment
Life cyclemanagement
Life cycle costing
Conclusions
• Principles, criteria and Indicators
• Life cycle assessment
• Concept
• Methodological choices
• Limits, weaknesses and current development