A Hierarchical Antecedent and Taxonomic Intervention Model of Career Indecision
-
Upload
ivy-publisher -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
description
Transcript of A Hierarchical Antecedent and Taxonomic Intervention Model of Career Indecision
9
http://www.ivypub.org/rpr/
Review in Psychology Research March 2013, Volume 2, Issue 1, PP.9-14
A Hierarchical Antecedent and Taxonomic
Intervention Model of Career Indecision Baoguo Xie
1#, Mian Xia
2
1. Career Development Center, Wuhan University of Technology, 430070, China
2. Department of Psychology, Huazhong Normal University, 430079, China
#Email: [email protected]
Abstract
In academia, the term of career indecision is typically defined as the difficulties encountered by individuals while making career-
related decisions. Searching the antecedents and effective career intervention are the focus of researchers and practitioners all the
time. Based on the former empirical studies, we divided the difficulties into four clusters: motivation, personality, emotion and
cognition. According to their power of effects on career indecision, these difficulties can be constructed into a hierarchical model.
Meanwhile, we indentified six kinds of career intervention, and constructed a taxonomic intervention model of career indecision.
Keywords: Career Indecision; Hierarchical Antecedents; Taxonomic Interventions
1 INTRODUCTION
Career indecision has long been a phenomenon of interest to parents, faculty, school counsellors, and others who
advise young adults on their career choices. In academia, career indecision is typically defined as the difficulties
encountered by individuals while making career-related decisions (Saka, Gati, &Kelly, 2008), or the inability to
select and commit to a career choice (Tokar, et al., 2003). In the short term, career indecision will result in lack of
motivation to engage in student role, inactivity in job search behaviour and frequently transferring career path and
learning field. In the long term, career indecision will have negative effects on their future career life and social
development outcomes. So indeed, career indecision is among the most researched issues in vocational psychology.
2 A HIERARCHICAL ANTECEDENT MODEL OF CAREER INDECISION
The earliest work on career indecision focused almost exclusively on the negative consequences young adults faced.
Because the researchers have found the negative consequences of career indecision through empirical studies, the
primary focus of the current research is on the antecedents of career indecision. So far, the researchers have
identified a number of antecedents of career indecision. Summarily, the antecedents can be divided into four
components, i.e., personality, emotion, cognition and motivation. The role that the four components played in career
decision can be illustrated by the following figure.
Because the effects of four components on individual career indecision are different, the model was constructed into
a hierarchical model. The influential power of four components is, in order, personal components, career decision-
making motivation, emotional components and cognitive components. Personal difficulties often result in chronic
indecision. Cognitive difficulties are associated with development of indecision. Meanwhile, these four components
interplay.
2.1 Personality
Personality is the deepest and most pervasive components resulting in individuals’ career indecision. Personal
difficulties emerged prior to career decision making, and triggered the emotional, motivational and cognitive
difficulties. Empirical study had consistently found that five traits have the most powerful effect on career indecision.
These traits are uncrystallized identity, self-esteem, neuroticism, proactive and trait anxiety.
10
http://www.ivypub.org/rpr/
FIG. 1 HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF CAREER INDECISION
1) Uncrystallized identity
It refers to difficulty in forming a stable sense of personal identity, which may be manifested in difficulties in
expressing consolidated beliefs, values, preferences, and life goals (Saka, Gati, &Kelly, 2008). Uncrystallized
identity often results in identity confusion, which leads to difficulty in processing career information about self and
vocation during career decision making.
2) Self-esteem
Self-esteem is typically defined as a disposition that a person has which represents their judgments of their own
worthiness (Olsen, Breckler, & Wiggins, 2008). Super claimed that career choice is an expression of the individual’s
self-concept in vocational terms. As a core part of self-concept, self-esteem therefore plays a central role in career
decision making. People tend to choose careers that will allow them to actualize their perceived potential and to
enhance their feelings of self-worth. Measures of self-esteem have consistently been found to be negatively
correlated with indecision measures—the lower one’s self-esteem is, the higher one’s career indecision is
(Emmanuelle, 2009). Low self-esteem also can lead to emotional difficulties in career decision, such as state anxiety,
pessimism.
3) Neuroticism
Neuroticism is a fundamental personality trait in the study of psychology. Individuals who score high on neuroticism
are more likely than the average to experience such feelings as anxiety, anger, envy, guilt, and depressed mood.
When it comes to career decision making, higher neurotic individual often responds with such feelings as state
anxiety, worry about outcomes of career decision making and strong need for career information. In fact, in
dimensions of the big 5 model, neuroticism was consistently found being associated with career indecision. For
instance, Stărică(2012)found neuroticism is the only significant predictor of career indecision in big 5 model
(Stărică, 2012).
11
http://www.ivypub.org/rpr/
4) Proactive
Proactive personality is the disposition that individual take self-initiated behaviour to change external environment,
regardless of the constraints situation imposed. Individuals who score higher on proactive personality have stronger
motivation of career decision making and willing to implement process of career decision making, and vice versa.
5) Trait anxiety
Trait anxiety is ingrained in a person's personality, and refers to the level of proneness of individuals to experience
anxiety. As a personal trait, trait anxiety endures over time and is manifested across a variety of situations.
Individuals with high trait anxiety perceive career decision making as more threatening and are more likely to
respond with dysfunctional emotion such as increased state anxiety. In the field of career decision, negative
correlations have consistently been found among trait anxiety and commitment to a career choice, whereas positive
correlations have been found between trait anxiety and career indecision. For example, Santos (2001) reported a high
positive correlation between trait anxiety and general indecisiveness and a negative correlation between trait anxiety
and vocational identity (Santos, 2001).
2.2 Motivation
Motivation is defined as the desire or drive to do things. Motivation is the premise that initiates, guides and
maintains goal-oriented behaviors. Career decision-making motivation refers to the level of desire to make career
decision. Selecting a career choice is a process. Firstly, individuals have to realize the need to make career decision.
Meanwhile, there are many obstacles during career decision making, in which strong career decision-making
motivation is helpful for decision-makers to make the effort to overcome these obstacles. When individuals are
aware of urgency to select a career choice, they will actively take proactive behaviours to gather career information,
as well as learn career decision knowledge and skills. Powell (2000) reported that individuals at critical career
decision points develop career decision ability more rapidly than their counterparts (Darrell, 2000).
2.3 Emotion
Though there is no consensus in the literature on a definition of emotion, the term is taken for granted in itself and,
most often, emotion is defined as feelings such as anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise and so on. As a kind of
psychological arousal, individuals often encounter some emotional difficulties arising during the actual choice
process. Emotional difficulties often further lead to some cognitive difficulties such as troubling in problem solving,
lower level in career decision-making self-efficacy. During period of career decision making, the two emotion
difficulties have strong association with career indecision.
1) State anxiety
Different from trait anxiety, state anxiety is a temporary emotional condition characterized with apprehension,
tension, and fear about a particular situation or activity. Individuals who score high on state anxiety are more likely
than the average to perceive tress in the career decision-making process. Meldahl and Muchinsky (1997) testified
this conclusion. Their research result indicated that state anxiety and level of perceived stress can discriminate
among individuals with different levels of indecision and indecisiveness (Meldahl & Muchinsky, 1997). In academia,
various aspects of state anxiety have consistently been shown to be associated with career indecision. In the
Emotional and Personality Career Difficulties Model (EPCD), Saka, Gati and Kelly identified four kinds of state
anxiety during career decision-making. They are anxiety about the process, uncertainty, the choice, and the outcomes,
respectively (Saka, Gati, &Kelly, 2008).
2) Pessimism
Pessimism is a state of mind in which one anticipates undesirable outcomes. Pessimists often focus on the negative
aspects of situations and expect negative outcomes. The role of pessimism in affecting the process of career decision
making has been demonstrated in several studies. For example, Krumboltz(1991) and Sampson et al.(1996) reported
that pessimistic and dysfunctional thoughts and beliefs may be manifested in various ways during the different stages
of the career-decision-making process. Meanwhile, individual who is pessimistic often has low career decision-
12
http://www.ivypub.org/rpr/
making self-efficacy. Based on a number of studies, Saka, Gati and Kelly identified three kind of pessimistic views
in their EPCD model. They are pessimistic views about the process, the world of work and one’s control (Saka, Gati,
&Kelly, 2008).
2.4 Cognition
Cognitions have been generally recognized as important factors that affect an individual's career decision-making
process and overall vocational development. Not only do personality, motivation and emotion involve in this process,
but also cognition involves in. There are mainly three cognitive difficulties impeding people to make a career choice.
1) Lack of career information
There is extensive consensus on the perspective that career information plays major role in career decision. Peterson,
Sampson and Reardon (1991) developed a new approach to career decision and development, i.e., cognitive
information processing theory (CIP) (Peterson, Sampson, & Reardon, 1991). According to the theory, if individual
makes career decision on the basis of pyramid of information processing domains, he or she will obtain good
outcomes of career decision. So we can indentify three informational difficulties, i.e., lack of self-knowledge, lack of
occupational knowledge and lack of skills about career decision making.
2) Dysfunctional career thoughts/ believes
Everyone has a set of assumptions on oneself, world of work. Positive and functional career thoughts boost the
career decision-making process and career development behaviors. Dysfunctional and negative career thoughts can
have a negative impact on the career decision-making process. For example, if individual holds this career belief that
I cannot make a good career decision, he or she will be lack of career decision-making motivation and avoid making
career decision. Several empiric studies testified the substantial relation between dysfunctional career thoughts and
career indecision (Saunders, et al., 2000; Kleiman, et al., 2004).
3) Career decision-making self-efficacy
Career decision-making self-efficacy is defined as the confidence individual has in their capacity to carry out a series
of tasks associated with career decision. Career decision-making self-efficacy consistently has been shown to be
associated with career indecision. Specifically, individuals who are low in career decision-making self-efficacy don’t
well in career decision-making tasks such as gathering career information, goal selection, planning and problem
solving. Meanwhile, individuals low in career decision-making self-efficacy will be lack of career decision-making
motivation. That is because self-efficacy has function of motivation.
3 A TAXONOMIC INTERVENTION MODEL OF CAREER INDECISION
Making out the difficulties in career decision-making provides possibility for career intervention. On the basis of the
hierarchical antecedent model of career indecision, we develop a taxonomic intervention model of career indecision.
In the model, the career interventions are divided into six categories. They are campus culture, information-
providing, career group, group counseling and individual counseling, respectively. The shape of model is funnel,
which means that career invention at the top of model covers the most people but it only can solve the superficial
career decision-making difficulties. Career invention at the bottom of model covers the least people, but it can solve
the deeper career decision-making difficulties. But there is no good and bad. It is only suitable or not suitable for
solving career indecision. For example, campus culture can effectively promote the individual’s career decision-
making motivation. Individual counseling can help clients to solve the career indecision because of personal
difficulties.
3.1 Campus culture
Culture is a very important power to influence people. Nowadays, because of effect of exam-oriented education,
Chinese university students generally lack awareness of career decision-making. They think selecting a career is a
task to complete, when hunting for job. We can pose them the urgency to make career decision through cultivating
campus culture helpful for career development. The measures to cultivate campus culture include career planning
13
http://www.ivypub.org/rpr/
match, career development month and so on。
FIG.2 TAXONOMIC INTERVENTION MODEL OF CAREER INDECISION
3.2 Information-Providing
One of important sources of career indecsion is lack of career information. Information-providing is self-help
service. Through this self-help service, students can improve their knowlegde about self, world of work, and skills
of career decison. Information-providing includes establishing information center, internet test internet vedio and so
on.
3.3 Career group
Different from the information-providing, career group is an career development service under the guidance of
career facilitators. Career group can effectively solve the similar issues because of cognition. Career group includes
career course, workshop, and all kinds of career development programs.
3.4 Group counseling
Group counseling is a powerful career intervetion to faciliate client’s growth and change. Not only do students
receive tremendous understanding, support, and encouragement from others facing similar issues, but they also gain
different perspectives, ideas, and viewpoints on those issues. Through group counseling, some tough difficulties in
career decision-making such as pessimiss, anxiety and so on, can be effectively solved.
3.5 Individual counseling
Athough individual counseling only can provide career intervention for one person at a time, tough difficulties such
as personal and some emotional difficulties can be solved by it. Indidivual counseling includes short-term and long-
14
http://www.ivypub.org/rpr/
term counseling.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The sources of career indecision are not only from cognition and motivation, but also from emotion and personality.
Because the degree of their effects on career indecision is different, we can construct these antecedents into a
hierarchical model. Personality difficulties represent the toughest and most persistent difficulties in career decision
making. According to the hierarchical antecedent model, the career intervention of career indecision can be divided
into six categories. According to the coverage of population and depth of difficulties, the six kinds of career
intervention can be constructed into a funnel model.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This paper is funded by Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Granted
Number: 11YJC190029). The authors would like to acknowledge its financial aid.
REFERENCES
[1] Darrell F. Powell. Critical Career Decision Points and Their Effect on Career Maturity, Alabama: Auburn University, 2000
[2] Emmanuelle, V. Inter-Relationships Among Attachment to Mother and Father, Self-Esteem, and Career Indecision, Journal of
Vocational Behavior, Vol. 75, pp. 91-99, May 2009
[3] Kleiman, T., et al., Dysfunctional Thinking and Difficulties in Career Decision Making, Journal of Career Assessment, Vol 12, pp.
312-331, August 2004
[4] Meldahl, J. M., and Muchinsky, P. M. The Neurotic Dimension of Vocational Indecision: Gender Comparability? Journal of
Career Assessment, Vol. 5, pp. 317-331, Jun 1997
[5] Olsen, J.M., Breckler, S.J., and Wiggins, E.C. Social Psychology Alive (1st Ed.), Canada: Nelson, 2008
[6] Peterson, G, W., Sampson, J. J., and Reardon, R. C. Career Development and Services: A Cognitive Approach, CA: Thomson
Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, 1991
[7] Saka, N., Gati, I., and Kelly, K. R. Emotional and Personality-Related Aspects of Career-Decision-Making Difficulties, Journal of
Career Assessment, Vol.16, pp.403-424, November 2008
[8] Santos, P. J. Predictors of Generalized Indecision Among Portuguese Secondary School Students, Journal of Career Assessment,
Vol. 9, pp. 381-396, Fall 2001
[9] Saunders, D. E., et al, “Relation of Depression and Dysfunctional Career Thinking to Career Indecision, Journal of Vocational
Behavior, Vol. 56, pp. 288-289, April 2000
[10] Stărică, E. C., Predictors for Career Indecision in Adolescence, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 33, pp. 168-172,
May 2012
[11] Tokar, D. M., Withrow, J. R., Hall, R. J., and Moradi, B. Psychological Separation, Attachment Security, Vocational Self-Concept
Crystallization, and Career Indecision: A Structural Equation Analysis, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 50, pp.3-19,
January 2003
AUTHORS 1Xie Baoguo (1979- ), Lecturer of Wuhan University of
Technology, doctor candidate of RenMin University, was
conferred by Huazhong Normal University in 2005. Research
field is career Master degree of psychology.
Email: [email protected]
2Xia Mian (1980- ), Lecturer of Huazhong Normal University,
Doctor Degree of psychology was conferred by Huazhong
Normal University in 2009. Research field is counseling
management and development.
Email: [email protected]