A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11...

77
PAPERS OF THE NAACP BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCES Microfilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editors: John H. Bracey, Jr., and Sharon Harley Supplement to Part 23: Legal Department Case Files, 1960–1972 Series B: The Northeast, Section I: Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of A UPA Collection from

Transcript of A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11...

Page 1: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

PAPERS OF THE NAACP

BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCESMicrofilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections

General Editors: John H. Bracey, Jr., and Sharon Harley

Supplement to Part 23:Legal Department CaseFiles, 1960–1972

Series B: The Northeast,Section I: Connecticut,Delaware, District ofColumbia, Maine,Massachusetts, NewHampshire, New Jersey,Pennsylvania, and RhodeIsland

A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of

A UPA Collectionfrom

Page 2: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

PAPERS OF THE NAACPSupplement to Part 23:

Legal Department Case Files, 1960–1972

Series B: The Northeast

Section I: Connecticut, Delaware, District ofColumbia, Maine, Massachusetts,

New Hampshire, New Jersey,Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island

Edited byJohn H. Bracey, Jr., and Sharon Harley

Project CoordinatorJason Ardizzone

Guide compiled byDaniel Lewis

BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCESMicrofilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections

General Editors: John H. Bracey, Jr., and Sharon Harley

7500 Old Georgetown Road • Bethesda, MD 20814-6126

A UPA Collection from

Page 3: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

i i

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Papers of the NAACP. Supplement to part 23, Legal department case files,1960–1972 [microform] / edited by John H. Bracey, Jr. and Sharon Harley;project coordinator, Randolph H. Boehm.

microfilm reels.— (Black studies research sources)Summary: Reproduces the working case files of the NAACP’s general

counsel and his staff from 1960 through 1972. The files consist of backgroundcorrespondence discussing strategic decisions in the litigation process,complaints, briefs, transcripts, depositions, and exhibits.

Accompanied by a printed guide compiled by Daniel Lewis entitled: A guideto the microfilm edition of Papers of the NAACP. Supplement to part 23, Legaldepartment case files, 1960–1972.

Contents: ser. A, The South. 1. Alabama, Arkansas, and Florida;2. Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia; 3. Kentucky,Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Texas—ser. B. The Northeast.1. Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Massachusetts, NewHampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island.

ISBN 1-55655-936-4 (series A, section I)—ISBN 1-55655-900-3 (series A,section II)—ISBN 0-88692-608-4 (series A, section III)—ISBN 1-55655-943-7(series B, section I)

1. African American—Legal status, laws, etc.—History—20th century—Sources. 2. African Americans—Civil rights—History—20th century—Sources.3. Civil rights movements—United States—History—20th century—Sources.4. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People—Archives.I. Title: Supplement to part 23. Legal department case files, 1960–1972. II. Title:Legal department case files, 1960–1972. III. Bracey, John H. IV. Harley,Sharon. V. Lewis, Daniel, 1972– VI. University Publications of America (Firm)VII. Title: Guide to the microfilm edition of Papers of the NAACP. Supplementto part 23, Legal department case files, 1960–1972. VIII. Series.

E185.61973'.0496073—dc21 2003556749

CIP

Copyright © 2006 LexisNexis,a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.

All rights reserved.ISBN 1-55655-943-7.

Page 4: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTSScope and Content Note ............................................................................................ xiSource Note ................................................................................................................. xviiEditorial Note .............................................................................................................. xviiAbbreviations .............................................................................................................. xixReel Index

Group V, Legal Department Case Files

Reel 1Connecticut

Group V, Box 195Accion Hispana, Inc. v. Town of New Canaan ................................................. 1

Group V, Boxes 196–197Barber v. Kinsella .............................................................................................. 1

Group V, Box 200Bridgeport Guardians v. Members of the Bridgeport Civil Service Commission ................................................................................................. 2

Reel 2Connecticut cont.

Group V, Box 201Connecticut Civil Liberties Union v. Sanders.................................................... 2Connecticut Transportation Coalition v. Meskill ................................................ 2Crumpton v. Chop ............................................................................................. 3

Group V, Box 202Housing Authority v. Dorsey ............................................................................. 3Johnson v. White .............................................................................................. 3Lumpkin v. Meskill ............................................................................................. 3

Reel 3Connecticut cont.

Group V, Box 203Lumpkin v. Meskill ............................................................................................. 3

Group V, Box 204Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Board of Education ............................................... 4

Group V, Box 205Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency ....................................... 4Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain..................................................... 4

Page 5: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

iv

Reel 4Connecticut cont.

Group V, Box 205 cont.Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain..................................................... 5

Group V, Box 206Scott v. Connecticut NAACP State Conference ............................................... 5Shapiro v. Thompson ........................................................................................ 5Stallworth v. Park City Hospital, Inc. ................................................................ 5

Group V, Box 207United States v. Board of Education of Waterbury, Conn. ................................ 5

DelawareGroup V, Box 223

Stanton v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co....................................................... 5State of Delaware v. Brown .............................................................................. 5State of Delaware v. Rogers ............................................................................. 5

District of ColumbiaGroup V, Box 341

Harrison v. Butz ................................................................................................ 6Hobson v. Hansen ............................................................................................ 6

Reel 5District of Columbia cont.

Group V, Box 341 cont.Hobson v. Hansen ............................................................................................ 6

Group V, Box 342Holden v. Macy ................................................................................................. 6Holmes v. Laird ................................................................................................. 6

Reels 6–7District of Columbia cont.

Group V, Boxes 343–344Holmes v. Laird ................................................................................................. 7

Reel 8District of Columbia cont.

Group V, Box 344 cont.Holmes v. Laird ................................................................................................. 9Horne, Frank S. ................................................................................................. 9

Group V, Box 345Kantrowitz v. Weinberger .................................................................................. 9

Group V, Box 348Legal Aid Society of Alameda County v. Bunty ................................................ 9Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. Phillips ......... 9

Group V, Box 351Moses v. Kennedy ............................................................................................ 9NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department .............................................. 9

Page 6: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

v

Group V, Box 352NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department .............................................. 10

Reel 9District of Columbia cont.

Group V, Box 366NAACP v. New York ........................................................................................ 10NAACP v. United States Labor Department ..................................................... 10

Group V, Box 370National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials v. Romney ........................................................................................................ 11

Group V, Box 373Nelson, Bernard H. ........................................................................................... 11Powell v. McCormack ....................................................................................... 11

Reel 10District of Columbia cont.

Group V, Boxes 374–375Powell v. McCormack ....................................................................................... 12

Reel 11District of Columbia cont.

Group V, Box 375 cont.Powell v. McCormack ....................................................................................... 13

MaineGroup V, Box 905

Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. Ingraham...................................... 13

MassachusettsGroup V, Box 931

Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee ...................................................... 14

Reel 12Massachusetts cont.

Group V, Boxes 931 cont.–932Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee ...................................................... 14

Reel 13Massachusetts cont.

Group V, Box 933Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee ...................................................... 15

Group V, Box 938Blakely v. Boston School Committee ................................................................ 15

Group V, Box 978Davis v. Springfield Education Association ...................................................... 16

Group V, Box 979Griffin v. Ryan ................................................................................................... 16

Page 7: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

vi

Reel 14Massachusetts cont.

Group V, Box 979 cont.Griffin v. Ryan ................................................................................................... 16

Group V, Box 980Landrum v. Richardson ..................................................................................... 17Morales v. Pelletier ............................................................................................School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Education.................................... 17

New HampshireGroup V, Box 1307

State of New Hampshire v. Sprague................................................................. 17

New JerseyGroup V, Box 1308

Adams v. Hughes ............................................................................................. 17Beaman v. Board of Education ......................................................................... 18

Group V, Box 1309Beaman v. Board of Education ......................................................................... 18

Reel 15New Jersey cont.

Group V, Boxes 1309 cont.–1310Board of Education v. Bonastia ......................................................................... 18

Group V, Box 1325Elliot v. Board of Education ............................................................................... 18

Reel 16New Jersey cont.

Group V, Box 1325 cont.Elliot v. Board of Education ............................................................................... 19

Group V, Box 1342Kidd v. Addonizio .............................................................................................. 19

Group V, Box 1343Marburger v. Board of Education ...................................................................... 19

Group V, Box 1348Picatinny Arsenal .............................................................................................. 19

Group V, Box 1349Plainfield School Case ...................................................................................... 20Rice v. Board of Education ............................................................................... 20

Reel 17New Jersey cont.

Group V, Boxes 1349 cont.–1350Rice v. Board of Education ............................................................................... 20

Page 8: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

vii

Reel 18New Jersey cont.

Group V, Box 1350 cont.Rice v. Board of Education ............................................................................... 21

Group V, Box 1351Roselle Branch NAACP v. Board of Education ................................................ 21

Group V, Boxes 1364–1365State of New Jersey v. Stokes ......................................................................... 21

Reel 19New Jersey cont.

Group V, Boxes 1365 cont.–1366State of New Jersey v. Stokes ......................................................................... 22

Reel 20New Jersey cont.

Group V, Boxes 1366 cont.–1367State of New Jersey v. Stokes ......................................................................... 22

Group V, Box 1369Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board of Education ...................................... 23

Group V, Box 1370Wynn v. Byrne .................................................................................................. 23

Reel 21Pennsylvania

Group V, Box 2203Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing Authority ..................................................... 24Barney v. Board of Education ........................................................................... 24Bolden v. Pennsylvania State Police ................................................................ 24

Group V, Boxes 2204–2205Commonwealth v. County of Bucks.................................................................. 24

Reel 22Pennsylvania cont.

Group V, Box 2205 cont.Commonwealth v. County of Bucks.................................................................. 25Commonwealth v. Glickman ............................................................................. 25

Group V, Box 2206Commonwealth v. Kreischer ............................................................................. 25Commonwealth v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers .................................................................................... 25

Group V, Box 2210Commonwealth v. Lyon .................................................................................... 25

Group V, Box 2211Commonwealth v. O’Neill .................................................................................. 25

Page 9: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

viii

Reel 23Pennsylvania cont.

Group V, Box 2211 cont.Commonwealth v. O’Neill .................................................................................. 25Commonwealth v. Rizzo ................................................................................... 25

Group V, Box 2212Commonwealth v. Rizzo ................................................................................... 26Commonwealth v. Sebastian ............................................................................ 26

Reel 24Pennsylvania cont.

Group V, Box 2212 cont.Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor ........ 26

Group V, Box 2213Erie Human Relations Commission v. Tullio ..................................................... 27Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co.................................................................... 27Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. .......................................................................... 27Herd v. Rizzo .................................................................................................... 27

Group V, Box 2214Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp. ......................................................... 27

Group V, Box 2218NAACP v. City of Johnstown ............................................................................ 27

Reel 25Pennsylvania cont.

Group V, Box 2218 cont.NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School District ................................................. 28NAACP v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission ...................................... 28North Philadelphia Branch of the NAACP v. School District ............................ 28

Group V, Box 2220Russell v. Moody .............................................................................................. 28Stanton Land Co. v. City of Pittsburgh.............................................................. 28

Group V, Box 2221University City Citizens Development Corp. v. Redevelopment Authority ....................................................................................................... 28

Group V, Box 2222Upper St. Clair Township v. Commonwealth .................................................... 28

Reel 26Pennsylvania cont.

Group V, Box 2222 cont.Upper St. Clair Township v. Commonwealth .................................................... 28Walton v. Eaton ................................................................................................. 29

Group V, Box 2223Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review .......................... 29

Page 10: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

ix

Rhode IslandGroup V, Box 2223 cont.

Delgado v. Veterans Administration Hospital .................................................... 29Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co. ...................................................... 29NAACP v. Rhode Island Chapter NAACP ....................................................... 29

Principal Correspondents Index ............................................................................... 31Subject Index ............................................................................................................... 37

Page 11: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine
Page 12: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

xi

In January 1967, at the opening session of the 90th Congress, the Houseleadership told Harlem representative Adam Clayton Powell that he would notparticipate when the other newly elected members took their oath of office. TheHouse refused to seat Powell pending an investigation of his conduct, includingpossible misuse of public funds. In February, the Select Committee assigned to thecase recommended to the full House that Powell be seated but censured for hisconduct. The House, however, rejected the Select Committee’s recommendation. Itvoted to exclude Powell and declared his seat vacant. Soon after, Powell andthirteen voters from New York’s eighteenth congressional district sued Speaker ofthe House John W. McCormack and other House members and officers. Theplaintiffs argued that McCormack and his co-defendants had violated the Constitutionbecause Powell met all the qualifications for House office and had been chosen bythe voters as their representative. The Supreme Court ruled in Powell’s favor inDecember 1969.

In December 1970, a German court convicted army Privates Nathaniel HolmesJr. and Bernard Tucker for the rape of a sixteen-year-old woman. Two months later,the court sentenced them to three years in jail. While the case was on appeal, theU.S. Army Eighth Infantry Division took custody of Holmes and Tucker. The twomen, however, escaped to the United States. In early June 1971, they sought theassistance of New York congresswoman Shirley Chisholm. On June 8, Holmes andTucker, accompanied by Chisholm, turned themselves in to army officials at thePentagon building in Arlington, Virginia. The army told Chisholm that it wouldinvestigate the case before taking any further actions but also placed Holmes andTucker in the confinement facility at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. On June 10, 1971, CaptainJ. Clay Smith, the army lawyer assigned to the case, informed RepresentativeChisholm that the military planned to put Holmes and Tucker on a 5 a.m. flight thenext day back to Germany. Chisholm contacted NAACP lawyers who immediatelybrought the case to U.S. District Court Judge Barrington Parker. Parker issued atemporary restraining order preventing military officials from returning the accusedmen to Germany. For the next year and a half, the case stayed in U.S. courts whileHolmes and Tucker remained confined at Fort Belvoir. In March 1972, Chisholm andthirty fellow Congress members, including presidential candidate Hubert H.Humphrey, sent a letter to army secretary Robert Froehlke appealing for action in thecase. The New York Post reported that the military was procrastinating because itwas “worried about the political repercussions in Germany” (Reel 6, Frame 0700).

SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE

Page 13: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

xii

Finally, in February 1973, the army sent Holmes and Tucker back to Germany wherethey were imprisoned until October 8, 1973. On October 9, the army dishonorablydischarged Holmes and Tucker.

The cases of Adam Clayton Powell and of Nathaniel Holmes and BernardTucker are just two of the many interesting cases reproduced in this edition ofPapers of the NAACP, Supplement to Part 23: Legal Department Case Files, 1960–1973, Series B: The Northeast, Section I: Connecticut, Delaware, District ofColumbia, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, andRhode Island. The documents in this section consist of the working case files of theNAACP’s general counsel and legal department staff for Connecticut, Delaware, theDistrict of Columbia, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey,Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. The cases from these states primarily relate toemployment discrimination and school desegregation. The cases are organizedalphabetically by state and within each state alphabetically by case name.

The NAACP had been concerned with employment discrimination since the1930s, but the cases in this edition are particularly interesting because they includeseveral early affirmative action cases. President John F. Kennedy first used the term“affirmative action” in Executive Order 10925, which created the Equal EmploymentOpportunity Commission. In September 1965, President Lyndon Baines Johnsonissued Executive Order 11246 requiring contractors to “take affirmative action toensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated duringemployment without regard to their race, creed, color or national origin” (Reel 24,Frame 0182). Over the next two years, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office ofFederal Contract Compliance (OFCC) gradually worked out a system that requiredcontractors to meet certain numerical goals in hiring minority workers. In 1967 inCleveland, Ohio, the OFCC adopted minority hiring “goals” for all federal constructionin Cleveland. These goals became known as the Cleveland Plan. Later that sameyear, a similar plan was adopted in Philadelphia. The so-called Philadelphia Planrequired “meaningful minority group representation in all trades” and “adoptedmanning tables (specific goals)” as the method of ensuring that enough minorityworkers were hired (Reel 24, Frame 0176). In 1968, however, U.S. ComptrollerGeneral Elmer B. Staats ruled that the Philadelphia Plan “violated the principles ofcompetitive bidding” (Reel 24, Frame 0124). To combat Staats’s ruling, in June andagain in September 1969, Assistant Secretary of Labor Arthur A. Fletcher issued twoorders revising the Philadelphia Plan. These new orders set ranges for thepercentage of minority employment in various construction trades. In January 1970,the Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania sued the secretary of labor,arguing that the revised Philadelphia Plan violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of1964. The contractors lost at the district court level and in the U.S. Court of Appeals,and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. The files in this edition includebackground information collected by the NAACP, the decision by Judge WilliamHastie in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and the NAACP’s amicuscuriae brief supporting the Philadelphia Plan.

Page 14: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

xiii

While the contractors case marked a victory for affirmative action programs,these programs were dealt a setback in two cases relating to employmentdiscrimination by the Philadelphia Police Department. In Commonwealth v. O’Neilland Commonwealth v. Rizzo, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and twelveunsuccessful African American applicants for employment with the PhiladelphiaPolice Department challenged the written examination and a backgroundinvestigation that were part of the department’s hiring process. The plaintiffs arguedthat the written examination administered by the department discriminated againstAfrican Americans and was not related to job performance. Whites passed the examat twice the rate of African Americans. The plaintiffs also argued that the backgroundinvestigation considered “illegitimate factors,” such as “prior contacts with the policedepartment not leading to arrest or conviction,” juvenile records, and hearsayevidence to deny jobs to African American applicants. Further, the PhiladelphiaInquirer discovered that, between 1967 and 1970, former police commissioner FrankL. Rizzo had approved the hiring of twenty white applicants “deemed unfit byinvestigators” (Reel 23, Frame 0411). As a result of these practices, the proportion ofAfrican American police officers dropped from 25 percent in 1966 to under 20 percentin 1970, and the number of African American recruits accepted fell from 30 percent in1966 to less than 8 percent in 1970. District Court Judge John P. Fullam declaredthat the Philadelphia Police Department had to hire one African American for everytwo whites. On appeal, however, Fullam’s decision was reversed by the U.S. Courtof Appeals.

This edition includes several other employment discrimination cases fromPennsylvania, as well as cases from Connecticut, the District of Columbia,Delaware, New Jersey, and Rhode Island. The other Pennsylvania cases are Boldenv. Pennsylvania, Commonwealth v. Glickman, Commonwealth v. Sebastian, ErieHuman Relations Commission v. Tullio, Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co.,Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp., NAACP v.Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission, and Walton v. Eaton. The Connecticutcases are Bridgeport Guardians v. Members of the Bridgeport Civil ServiceCommission and Stallworth v. Park City Hospital, Inc. The Delaware employmentdiscrimination case is Stanton v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. The cases fromthe District of Columbia are Harrison v. Butz and NAACP v. District of Columbia FireDepartment. Finally, Rhode Island cases are Delgado v. Veterans AdministrationHospital and Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.

School desegregation remained an important issue for the NAACP in the 1960sand 1970s. Three cases in this edition are noteworthy because each raised differentissues, illustrating the complexity of school desegregation. Blakely v. Bostonrepresented the first stage in a battle to desegregate Boston’s schools that lastedover fifteen years, a battle that, in the mid-1970s, made Boston a symbol of whiteresistance to school desegregation and busing programs. The Boston case began inthe early 1960s when African American parents, joined by the Boston NAACPbranch, organized demonstrations against inferior education for their children. In

Page 15: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

xiv

August 1963, the Boston NAACP branch submitted a statement to the Boston SchoolCommittee that summarized their reasons for protesting. The statement referred tothe Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education in which aunanimous court declared that “separate educational facilities are inherentlyunequal.” The Boston NAACP acknowledged that Brown applied to schoolsdeliberately segregated by law but argued:

This historic decision went further to describe in unmistakable languagehow harmful separation is to Negro children. Unfortunately in our societytoday, a man’s color determines his status. This attitude is reflected in theassociation made with Negro schools. Thus as the school becomespredominantly Negro, it is viewed as a lower status school. Therefore, it isimpossible … to discuss the educational problems pertaining to Negropupils in Boston without first attacking the source of these problems … defacto segregation (Reel 13, Frame 0200).

The Boston School Committee, however, was intransigent. Louise Day Hicks,who would be at the center of the school controversy for the next decade, “dared”the NAACP to sue. Hicks and fellow committee member Joseph Lee even used afavorite tactic of southern segregationists blaming the troubles in Boston on “outsideagitators.” Hicks also attacked Boston’s suburban residents. During a televisionappearance in February 1964, Hicks cautioned: “Before the people of suburbiapontificate on conditions in the Boston school system, they would do well to makesure that conditions in their own school and communities are not in need of anyremedial action” (Reel 13, Frame 0263). In April 1965, the NAACP filed suit againstthe Boston School Committee demanding an end to segregation in Boston’s publicschools. This particular case was abandoned after the passage of theMassachusetts Racial Imbalance Law in August 1965, but it was only the start of thebusing controversy in Boston.

Meanwhile, in Montclair, New Jersey, several different cases culminated in themid-1970s in a desegregation battle pitting the Montclair Board of Education againstthe town’s mayor, Peter J. Bonastia, and the Town Commission. As in Boston, theMontclair case grew out of demonstrations by African American parents. InSeptember 1961, African American parents picketed in front of the Glenfield JuniorHigh School protesting against segregation and the inferior education provided totheir children. In 1967, in Rice v. Board of Education, the commissioner of educationordered the Montclair Board of Education to devise a school desegregation plan.After several other court cases and political maneuvering, finally, in April 1972, theNew Jersey commissioner of education approved the Montclair board’sdesegregation plan. The plan, which included busing of children, was to beimplemented in September 1972. In May 1972, five persons opposed to busing wonplaces on the Montclair Town Commission. One of those five, Peter J. Bonastia, wasselected as mayor. Led by Bonastia, the Town Commission tried various ploys tocircumvent the busing order. They appealed to the governor of New Jersey todismiss the state commissioner of education. They also expanded the school board

Page 16: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

xv

in order to gain a majority that would oppose busing. In March 1973, the TownCommission reduced the school board budget by $150,000, including $50,000 thathad been set aside for busing. Board of Education v. Bonastia grew out of thisbudget cut.

NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School District involved still another issue. In1970, officials from the Pennsylvania State Department of Education and thePennsylvania Human Relations Commission ordered the Greater Johnstown SchoolDistrict to devise a plan for ending “racial imbalance” in the Greater Johnstownschools. The Greater Johnstown Board of Education decided to close WashingtonElementary School and to bus the school’s African American students to otherschools. The NAACP and parents of the students sued the school district, arguingthat the plan to close the Washington school was arbitrary and placed “anunjustifiable burden on black students” (Reel 25, Frame 0001). In July 1973, U.S.District Court Judge J. Weber dismissed the case. Weber found that more whitestudents than black students were being bused. He noted that because of factorssuch as traffic patterns near the school and the poor physical condition of the school,the board’s decision to close Washington Elementary made sense from both aneducational and economic perspective.

Other school desegregation cases in this edition are Crumpton v. Chop(Bridgeport, Connecticut); Lumpkin v. Meskill (Hartford, Connecticut); NorwalkCORE v. Norwalk Board of Education (Norwalk, Connecticut); Hobson v. Hansen(Washington, D.C.); Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee (Springfield,Massachusetts); Beaman v. Board of Education (Hackensack, New Jersey); andElliot v. Board of Education (Neptune Township, New Jersey).

Other interesting cases in this edition include Barber v. Kinsella, NAACP v. NewYork, Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. Ingraham, State of New Jersey v.Stokes, and Commonwealth v. Kreischer. Barber v. Kinsella involved the arrest ofdemonstrators in Hartford, Connecticut. In NAACP v. New York, the U.S. SupremeCourt affirmed the decision of the district court denying the NAACP’s right tointervene in a voting rights case. The NAACP v. New York documents include thebrief submitted to the court by the NAACP and the Supreme Court’s decision. InBenevolent and Protective Order of the Elks v. Ingraham, the Elks, a privatemembership organization, were denied a liquor license because they did not acceptAfrican Americans as members. In State of New Jersey v. Stokes, John H. Stokes,a teacher at Rahway High School, was on trial for assault and battery on a policeofficer in connection with demonstrations by Rahway High School students.Commonwealth v. Kreischer was a child custody battle in which the mother of threechildren lost custody after she married a black man.

This edition of Papers of the NAACP represents the fourth section of legal casefiles microfilmed by LexisNexis focusing on the period after 1965. Other parts ofPapers of the NAACP that contain significant documentation on the NAACP LegalDepartment are Part 23: Legal Department Case Files, 1956–1965; Part 22: LegalDepartment Administrative Files; and Supplement to Part 16: Board of Directors File,1966–1970.

Page 17: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine
Page 18: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

xvii

SOURCE NOTEThe documents microfilmed for this edition are held by the Manuscript Division

of the Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. The files selected for this edition weredrawn from Group V, Legal Department, Case Files, of the National Association forthe Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) Records collection.

EDITORIAL NOTEProfessor John H. Bracey, Jr., compiled this edition of Papers of the NAACP

after a thorough survey of the Legal Department Case Files in Group V of theNAACP Records collection at the Library of Congress. Each file selected for thisedition has been reproduced in its entirety.

Page 19: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine
Page 20: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

xix

ABBREVIATIONSThe following abbreviations are used three or more times in this guide.

AFL-CIO American Federation of Labor–Congress of IndustrialOrganizations

CORE Congress of Racial Equality

EEOC Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Elks Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks

HEW U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare

HUD U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

NAACP National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Page 21: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine
Page 22: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

1

REEL INDEX Following is a list of the folders that compose Papers of the NAACP, Supplement to Part 23:

Legal Department Case Files, 1960–1972, Series B: The Northeast, Section I: Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. The four-digit number on the far left is the frame at which a particular file folder begins. This is followed by the file title and the date(s) of the file. Substantive issues are highlighted under the heading Major Topics, as are prominent correspondents under the heading Principal Correspondents. Major Topics and Principal Correspondents are listed in the order in which they appear on the film, and each is listed only once per folder.

Reel 1 Frame No.

Group V, Legal Department Case Files Connecticut

Group V, Box 195 0001 Accion Hispana, Inc. v. Town of New Canaan, 1971.

Major Topic: Housing discrimination in New Canaan and Norwalk.

Group V, Box 196 0033 Barber v. Kinsella—Background Information: General, 1967.

Major Topics: Connecticut Civil Liberties Union; Carmichael v. Allen (arrest of Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee members in Atlanta for rioting and suit brought by Stokely Carmichael and Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee regarding freedom of speech and assembly); State of Connecticut v. Harris (disturbing the peace); Hartford NAACP branch; Connecticut state law on inciting to riot and breach of the peace; Hartford laws on refusal to obey a police officer and failing to leave a public place when ordered; freedom of speech and assembly.

0103 Barber v. Kinsella—Background Information: Newspaper Clippings, 1967. Major Topics: Demonstration by the Black Caucus to protest police brutality and

arrest of John Barber for obstructing a public place; demonstrations by the Black Caucus against housing discrimination; violent clashes between demonstrators and Hartford police; Community Renewal Team; meeting between Black Caucus and Hartford city officials regarding police brutality.

0184 Barber v. Kinsella—Depositions: Benjamin Goldstein [Hartford police officer], November 1967.

Major Topics: Training of Hartford police officers; arrest of Wilbur Smith at Connecticut Welfare Department offices for breach of the peace; arrest of John Barber for arson; John Barber; demonstrations by the Black Caucus to protest police brutality; demonstrations by the Black Caucus against housing discrimination; violent clashes between demonstrators and Hartford police.

Page 23: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

2

0387 Barber v. Kinsella—Depositions: John J. Kerrigan [Hartford chief of police], November 1967.

Major Topics: Hartford police responses to demonstrations by the Black Caucus; shooting of William Furbish by Hartford police officer Thomas Ganley.

0497 Barber v. Kinsella—Depositions: George B. Kinsella [Hartford mayor], December 1967.

Major Topic: Mayor’s response to disturbance in Hartford’s North End, to shooting of William Furbish by Hartford police officer Thomas Ganley, and to demonstrations by the Black Caucus.

0601 Barber v. Kinsella—General Case Material, June–September 1967. Major Topics: Statement by Herman Barnes regarding police brutality; definitions of

crimes against public and private property. 0646 Barber v. Kinsella—General Case Material, October 1967.

Major Topics: John Barber; George Foster-Bey; Christine Rutherford; Johnie Smith; Joseph D. Williams; shooting of William Furbish by Hartford police officer Thomas Ganley; demonstrations by Black Caucus and arrest of demonstrators; arrest of George Foster-Bey after leading march to city jail; police brutality.

Principal Correspondent : Richard F. Bellman. 0766 Barber v. Kinsella—General Case Material, November–December 1967.

Major Topics: Arrest of George Foster-Bey for leading march to city jail; John D. Labelle; Daniel E. Lynch; police brutality; Black Caucus; Arthur Johnson.

Principal Correspondent : Wilber G. Smith. 0837 Barber v. Kinsella—General Case Material, 1968 and undated.

Major Topic: Arrest of George Foster-Bey. Principal Correspondent : Richard F. Bellman.

Group V, Box 197 0850 Barber v. Kinsella—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, 1967.

Major Topics: John Barber; Black Caucus; George Foster-Bey; Hartford NAACP branch; Ronald M. Weaver; Christine Rutherford; Johnie Smith; Joseph D. Williams; John D. Labelle; Daniel E. Lynch; freedom of assembly.

Group V, Box 200 0919 Bridgeport Guardians v. Members of the Bridgeport Civil Service Commission,

1973. Major Topics: Hiring and promotion procedures of the Bridgeport police department;

employment discrimination. Principal Correspondents: Charles D. Smith; Charles E. Carter.

Reel 2 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Connecticut cont. Group V, Box 201 0001 Connecticut Civil Liberties Union v. Sanders, 1969–1971.

Major Topics: Discrimination in education; public funding for private schools. Principal Correspondents: William C. Jones; Paul W. Orth.

0033 Connecticut Transportation Coalition v. Meskill, 1974. Major Topics: Connecticut River Ecology Action Corporation; monorail from Bradley

Field to parking lot; public transportation.

Page 24: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

3

0055 Crumpton v. Chop—Background Information: General, 1953–1978 and undated. Major Topics: Vaccinations for children attending Bridgeport public schools; rules

and regulations of Bridgeport Board of Education; African American and Puerto Rican students in Bridgeport public schools; Bridgeport-Stratford NAACP branch; de facto segregation; Center for Urban Education; Operation Medicare Alert.

0216 Crumpton v. Chop—Background Information: “Housing in the Greater Bridgeport Region, 1960–1980,” 1965.

Major Topics: Population statistics; housing supply and costs; projections of future housing demand.

0473 Crumpton v. Chop—Background Information: Newspaper Clippings, 1964–1966. Major Topics: Bridgeport-Stratford NAACP branch; school desegregation; de facto

segregation; Bridgeport Board of Education; busing. 0511 Crumpton v. Chop—General Case Material, 1964–1966.

Major Topics: Bridgeport-Stratford NAACP branch; Bridgeport Board of Education; de facto segregation; school desegregation; housing conditions; housing discrimination; Bridgeport Inter-Group Council; Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance.

Principal Correspondents: June Shagaloff; Sondra Sellinger; Francis J. King; Joan Franklin.

Group V, Box 202 0670 Housing Authority v. Dorsey, 1973.

Major Topics: Public housing; Housing Authority of the City of New Haven; eligibility of a tenant to hold the office of Housing Authority commissioner; Connecticut NAACP State Conference; New Haven NAACP branch.

Principal Correspondent : Ben F. Andrews Jr. 0724 Johnson v. White, 1971 and undated.

Major Topics: Rental allowances provided to welfare recipients by Connecticut State Welfare Department; Rhode Island Fair Welfare Rights Organization v. Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services.

0839 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, 1971. Major Topics: Lumpkin v. Dempsey; segregation in Hartford schools.

0844 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, 1972. Major Topics: Segregation in Hartford schools; Lumpkin v. Dempsey; school

desegregation; ethnic and racial distribution of students in Hartford schools. Principal Correspondents: Nathaniel R. Jones; Wilber G. Smith; Louis R. Lucas;

J. Harold Flannery; Douglas M. Crockett.

Reel 3 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Connecticut cont. Group V, Box 203 0001 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, 1973.

Major Topics: Segregation in Hartford schools; plaintiffs’ opposition to adding suburban school districts as defendants; Bradley v. Milliken (Detroit school desegregation); overcrowding in Hartford schools.

Principal Correspondents: Douglas M. Crockett; Robert K. Killian; Louis R. Lucas; Nathaniel R. Jones; John Rose Jr.

Page 25: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

4

0166 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, January–April 1974. Major Topics: Segregation in Hartford schools; racial distribution of students in

Hartford schools. Principal Correspondents: Nathaniel R. Jones; John A. Dziamba; Louis R. Lucas.

0278 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, May 1974. Major Topics: Segregation in Hartford schools; racial distribution of students in

Hartford schools. Principal Correspondents: John A. Dziamba; Douglas M. Crockett.

0376 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, June–September 1974. 0400 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, October 1974.

Major Topic: Racial distribution of faculty and students in Hartford schools. Principal Correspondent : John A. Dziamba.

0506 Lumpkin v. Meskill—General Case Material, November–December 1974. Principal Correspondent : John A. Dziamba.

0550 Lumpkin v. Meskill—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes, 1973 and undated. Major Topics: Racial distribution of students in Hartford schools; segregation in

Hartford schools.

Group V, Box 204 0637 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Board of Education, 1968.

Major Topics: Roodner Court Fair Rent Association; Timothy Blunt; Nicholas Hernandez; neighborhood schools in predominantly African American and Puerto Rican neighborhoods; busing of African American and Puerto Rican students to schools in predominantly white neighborhoods; Nathaniel Ely School; NAACP amicus curiae brief.

Principal Correspondents: Albert Rousseau; Lewis M. Steel; Emanuel Margolis.

Group V, Box 205 0759 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency, 1966–1967.

Major Topics: Norwalk Housing Authority; Spring Street Tenants Association; plans for urban renewal project, including demolition of residential housing in the project area; discrimination in public housing; Connecticut Civil Liberties Union amicus curiae brief; equal protection of the laws.

Principal Correspondents: Rene Eastland; Maria L. Marcus. 0906 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency, February–November 1968. 0920 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency, 1969 and undated.

Major Topics: Displacement of persons by urban renewal programs; equal protection of the laws; discrimination in public housing; Connecticut Civil Rights Commission; Operation Open City (Norwalk).

0979 Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain—Background Information, 1970–1973 and undated.

Major Topics: New Britain NAACP branch; plans for low- and moderate-cost housing; HUD; New Britain Redevelopment Commission; urban renewal; NAACP antitrust complaint regarding savings and loan institutions in California; NAACP v. University of California (employment discrimination); NAACP v. City of Johnstown (urban renewal); Nutmeg Housing, Inc., by-laws.

Principal Correspondents: William R. Morris; Leonard H. Carter.

Page 26: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

5

Reel 4 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Connecticut cont. Group V, Box 205 cont. 0001 Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain—General Case Material, 1972.

Major Topics: New Britain Common Council decision to eliminate Nutmeg Housing, Inc., from urban renewal housing project; New Britain Redevelopment Commission.

Principal Correspondents: Allenstine D. Willis; Andrew L. Jones; Lawrence L. Thompson; William R. Morris; Abraham Ribicoff.

0059 Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain—General Case Material, 1973. Major Topics: HUD; discrimination in housing; urban renewal; New Britain

Redevelopment Commission; NAACP v. Pac (discrimination in housing). Principal Correspondents: Andrew L. Jones; George V. Lawler; William R. Morris;

Charles E. Carter; James J. Barry; Kenneth S. McHargh.

Group V, Box 206 0232 Scott v. Connecticut NAACP State Conference, 1970–1975 and undated.

Major Topic: Connecticut NAACP State Conference allegation of discrimination by Shirley Scott and Scott suit for libel.

Principal Correspondents: William C. Jones; George Albert Brown Jr.; Charles E. Carter; John Rose Jr.

0350 Shapiro v. Thompson, 1968. Major Topic: Residency requirement for Aid to Families with Dependent Children.

0373 Stallworth v. Park City Hospital, Inc., 1970–1974 and undated. Major Topics: Dismissal of Vera Martin Stallworth from her position as physician at

Park City Hospital; employment discrimination; Greater Bridgeport NAACP branch.

Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; Sonia Pressman Fuentes; Vera Martin Stallworth.

Group V, Box 207 0568 United States v. Board of Education of Waterbury, Conn., 1969–1974 and undated.

Major Topics: Segregation in Waterbury, Conn., public schools; school desegregation plans, including busing.

Principal Correspondents: J. Harold Flannery; David L. Norman; James I. Meyerson.

Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont. Delaware

Group V, Box 223 0689 Stanton v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 1973 and undated.

Major Topics: Employment discrimination; EEOC. 0699 State of Delaware v. Brown, 1963.

Major Topics: Deer Park Hotel; discrimination in public accommodations. 0716 State of Delaware v. Rogers, 1971.

Major Topics: Arrest of Emma Rogers for breach of the peace and resisting arrest; police brutality.

Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; Emma Rogers; Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Page 27: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

6

Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont. District of Columbia

Group V, Box 341 0786 Harrison v. Butz, 1972–1973.

Major Topics: Employment discrimination; U.S. Department of Agriculture. Principal Correspondents: C. Arthur Hollis; Jerome Shuman.

0869 Hobson v. Hansen—General Case Material, ca. 1967. Major Topic: Segregation and discrimination in Washington, D.C., public schools.

Reel 5 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 341 cont. 0001 Hobson v. Hansen—General Case Material, 1968.

Major Topics: Segregation and discrimination in Washington, D.C., public schools; Robert L. Carter; J. Skelly Wright; Smuck v. Hobson; Hansen v. Hobson; National Education Association amicus curiae brief.

0125 Hobson v. Hansen—General Case Material, ca. 1968. Major Topic: Segregation and discrimination in Washington, D.C., public schools.

0219 Hobson v. Hansen—General Case Material, undated. Major Topics: NAACP amicus curiae brief; segregation and discrimination in

Washington, D.C., public schools; National School Boards Association amicus curiae brief.

Group V, Box 342 0262 Holden v. Macy—Background Information, 1964–1965.

Major Topic: Termination of Gladys Ann Holden as Education and Research Program Specialist, Office of Equal Educational Opportunity.

0267 Holden v. Macy—General Case Material, 1966–1968. Major Topics: Termination of Anna Holden as Education and Research Program

Specialist, HEW Office of Equal Educational Opportunity; protests and inquiries regarding Holden’s termination, including NAACP letter to HEW Secretary John W. Gardner.

Principal Correspondents: Anna Holden; J. Francis Pohlhaus; Joan Franklin; James T. Masterson; James C. O’Brien; Paul E. Miller; Ralph J. Temple.

0366 Holden v. Macy—Lawyers’ Notes, undated. 0378 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, 1969–1970.

Major Topic: Sentence of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. for rape committed in Bad Kreuznach, West Germany.

0489 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, March–May 1971. Major Topic: Drug addiction among Vietnam veterans.

0503 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, June 8–17, 1971. Major Topics: Escape of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker from Germany

and surrender to Defense Department officials; granting of temporary restraining order by U.S. District Judge Barrington Parker to prevent Defense Department from sending Holmes and Tucker back to West Germany.

Principal Correspondents: J. Francis Pohlhaus; Roy Wilkins; Nathaniel R. Jones.

Page 28: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

7

0611 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, June 19–30, 1971. Major Topics: Escape of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker from Germany

and surrender to Defense Department officials; U.S. District Court denial of application for injunction; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement.

Principal Correspondents: Roy Wilkins; James F. Senechal; J. Clay Smith Jr. 0708 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, July–August 1971.

Major Topics: Conviction of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker for rape in Bad Kreuznach, West Germany; surrender of Holmes and Tucker to Defense Department officials; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; extradition.

Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; J. Clay Smith Jr.

Reel 6 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 343 0001 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, September–October 1971.

Major Topics: Demand of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker for release from pretrial confinement and speedy trial; petition for writ of habeas corpus; Williams v. Rogers (Military Bases in the Philippines Agreement); rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; Uniform Code of Military Justice; Blount v. Laird (U.S. Status of Forces Agreement with Republic of Korea; jurisdiction of Korean and American courts).

Principal Correspondents: Sanford W. Harvey Jr.; James I. Meyerson; Nathaniel R. Jones; J. Clay Smith Jr.; Robert F. Froehlke.

0206 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, November–December 1971. Major Topic: Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; Nathaniel Holmes Jr.; Bernard

Tucker. 0290 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, January–February 1972.

Major Topics: Imprisonment of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker at Center Confinement Facility, Fort Belvoir, Va.; habeas corpus; right to a speedy trial; jurisdiction of military and civil courts; disobedience of the lawful order of a superior commissioned officer.

Principal Correspondents: Ronald S. Durian; James I. Meyerson; J. Francis Pohlhaus; Bernard Tucker.

0481 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, March 1–10, 1972. Major Topics: Conviction of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker for rape in Bad

Kreuznach, West Germany; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; right to a speedy trial; pretrial confinement of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker at Center Confinement Facility, Fort Belvoir, Va.; petition for writ of habeas corpus; Shirley Chisholm; Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Principal Correspondents: Shirley Chisholm; Nathaniel R. Jones; J. Francis Pohlhaus; Stephen Daniel Jr.; Hubert H. Humphrey.

Page 29: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

8

0657 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, March 13–31, 1972. Major Topics: Congressional support for Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker;

Shirley Chisholm; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement.

Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; David F. Addlestone; Shirley Chisholm.

0755 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, April–June 1972. Major Topics: Imprisonment of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker at Center

Confinement Facility, Fort Belvoir, Va.; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; Tucker v. Froehlke; habeas corpus; right to a speedy trial.

Principal Correspondents: Harold E. Hughes; Birch Bayh; James I. Meyerson; J. Clay Smith Jr.; Nathaniel R. Jones; Michael S. Davison.

0835 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, July–December 1972. Major Topics: Rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement;

Tucker v. Froehlke; habeas corpus. Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; Frederic E. Davison; Nathaniel R.

Jones.

Reel 7 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 344 0001 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, 1973–1974.

Major Topics: Return of Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker to West Germany; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; trial of Holmes and Tucker in West Germany; undesirable discharge of Holmes and Tucker from U.S. Army and NAACP efforts to change discharge category.

Principal Correspondents: Nathaniel Holmes Jr.; Bernard Tucker; James I. Meyerson; Sanford W. Harvey Jr.; Julius E. Williams.

0179 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, undated (1 of 3). Major Topics: Petition for writ of habeas corpus; demand for release from pretrial

confinement and for a speedy trial; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin U.S. Army from sending Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker back to West Germany.

Principal Correspondents: Sanford W. Harvey Jr.; J. Clay Smith Jr. 0320 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, undated (2 of 3).

Major Topics: Demand for release from pretrial confinement and for a speedy trial; rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin U.S. Army from sending Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker back to West Germany; Tucker v. Froehlke; habeas corpus.

Principal Correspondent : Sanford W. Harvey Jr. 0492 Holmes v. Laird—General Case Material, undated (3 of 3).

Major Topics: Rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement; motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin U.S. Army from sending Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker back to West Germany; fair trial guarantees in Army Regulation 27-50.

Page 30: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

9

0590 Holmes v. Laird—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, 1972. Major Topics: Rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement;

plan of U.S. officials to send Nathaniel Holmes Jr. and Bernard Tucker back to West Germany.

0754 Holmes v. Laird—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, undated (1 of 4). Major Topics: Extradition; habeas corpus.

0774 Holmes v. Laird—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, undated (2 of 4). Major Topics: Jurisdiction of military and civil courts; right to counsel; right to a

speedy trial. 0870 Holmes v. Laird—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, undated (3 of 4).

Major Topics: Habeas corpus; right to a speedy trial; right to counsel; expiration of enlistment and jurisdiction of military courts; disobedience of orders.

Reel 8 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 344 cont. 0001 Holmes v. Laird—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, undated (4 of 4).

Major Topic: Rights of military personnel under NATO Status of Forces Agreement. 0158 Horne, Frank S., 1955.

Major Topic: Elimination of Horne’s position in the Housing and Home Finance Agency.

Principal Correspondents: Thurgood Marshall; Frank S. Horne; Albert M. Cole; Pauli Murray.

Group V, Box 345 0180 Kantrowitz v. Weinberger, 1974.

Major Topics: Complaint to enjoin enforcement of Medicaid statute that denies payment to persons in mental health institutions; discrimination in federal health care programs.

Group V, Box 348 0223 Legal Aid Society of Alameda County v. Bunty, 1971–1972 and undated.

Major Topics: Freedom of Information Act; Executive Order 11246 (equal employment opportunity and affirmative action by government contractors).

Principal Correspondents: David A. Sawyer; Stephen E. Ronfelt. 0251 Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. Phillips, 1973.

Major Topic: Attempt by director of Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) to close OEO offices and terminate funding for the agency.

Group V, Box 351 0277 Moses v. Kennedy, 1963.

Major Topics: Federal-state relations in law enforcement; powers of federal law enforcement agencies; discrimination in administration of justice.

0294 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—General Case Material, 1966–1969.

Major Topics: Equal employment opportunity; employment discrimination; withdrawal of 147 African American members of Local 36, International Association of Fire Fighters; Progressive Firefighters Association.

Principal Correspondent : Joseph R. Granados.

Page 31: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

10

0366 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—General Case Material, 1970. Major Topics: Local 36, International Association of Fire Fighters; Progressive

Firefighters Association; employment discrimination; regulations for merit promotion in D.C. Fire Department; allocation of personnel in D.C. Fire Department.

0515 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—General Case Material, January–July 1971.

Major Topics: Appointment of Joseph H. Mattare as D.C. fire chief; employment discrimination; D.C. Fire Department employment statistics, hiring procedures, organization chart, and salary schedule.

Group V, Box 352 0646 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—General Case Material, October–

November 1971. Major Topics: Collective bargaining agreement between D.C. Fire Department and

Local 36, International Association of Fire Fighters; Progressive Firemen’s Association.

0675 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—General Case Material, 1972. Major Topics: Progressive Firemen’s Association; D.C. Fire Department equal

employment opportunity action plan; employment discrimination; recruitment by International Association of Firefighters in Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Memphis, and Washington, D.C.; Moore v. District of Columbia Fire Department (employment discrimination).

0743 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—General Case Material, 1973–1974.

Major Topics: Progressive Firemen’s Association; retirement of D.C. Fire Chief Joseph H. Mattare; roster of D.C. Fire Department personnel; appointment of Burton W. Johnson as D.C. fire chief; employment discrimination; Local 36, International Association of Fire Fighters.

Principal Correspondents: William D. Wells; Burton W. Johnson. 0809 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—General Case Material, undated.

Major Topics: Progressive Firemen’s Association; employment discrimination; D.C. Fire Department rules and performance requirements for probationary employees.

0880 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, undated.

Reel 9 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 366 0001 NAACP v. New York, 1972–1973.

Major Topic: Attempt by New York, Bronx, and Kings Counties to gain exemption from federal clearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970.

0139 NAACP v. United States Labor Department, 1971. Major Topic: Demand for abolition of Labor Department’s Farm Labor Service.

Page 32: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

11

Group V, Box 370 0189 National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials v. Romney, 1973.

Major Topics: Low-income public housing; Housing Act of 1937; United States Housing Authority; HUD.

Group V, Box 373 0261 Nelson, Bernard H., 1960–1961.

Major Topics: Delta Air Lines; discrimination in public accommodations; Moissant International Airport (New Orleans).

Principal Correspondents: W. D. Huff; James M. Dikeman; Bernard H. Nelson; Robert L. Carter; Cecil P. Nelson.

0271 Powell v. McCormack—Background Information: General, 1942–1950, 1967, and undated (1 of 2).

Major Topics: House of Representatives investigation of Adam Clayton Powell for possible misuse of public funds; NAACP position on the investigation; Julian Bond.

0343 Powell v. McCormack—Background Information: General, 1942–1950, 1967, and undated (2 of 2).

Major Topics: Senate attempt to deny seat to William Langer; constitutional prohibition against bills of attainder; power of House of Representatives to expel members; qualifications for member of House of Representatives; election laws; House investigations of right of member-elect to seat in Congress.

0466 Powell v. McCormack—Background Information: Newspaper Clippings, 1967. Major Topic: House of Representatives investigation of Adam Clayton Powell for

possible misuse of public funds and House refusal to seat Powell in the 90th Congress.

0520 Powell v. McCormack—Background Information: United States House of Representatives, Hearings before the Committee on House Administration, 1966.

Major Topics: Investigation of Adam Clayton Powell for possible misuse of public funds.

0630 Powell v. McCormack—Background Information: Relevant Case Law, 1892–1897, 1917–1929, 1949, and 1957–1966.

Major Topics: Customs duties; rules of the House of Representatives; unreasonable searches and seizures; power of Congress to punish for contempt of Congress; congressional powers regarding elections and witness testimony; termination of government employees; right to counsel; right against self-incrimination.

0750 Powell v. McCormack—Exhibits, 1966. Major Topics: Testimony in James v. Powell regarding residency of Adam Clayton

Powell; rental payments. 0794 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, January 1967.

Major Topics: House refusal to seat Adam Clayton Powell in the 90th Congress until conclusion of investigation of Powell’s conduct and possible misuse of public funds; House Select Committee recommendation to censure Powell; Powell petition to be seated in the 90th Congress.

Principal Correspondents: Joan Franklin; Jean Camper Cahn.

Page 33: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

12

Reel 10 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 374 0001 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, February 1967.

Major Topics: House resolution refusing to seat Adam Clayton Powell in the 90th Congress until conclusion of Select Committee investigation; Powell petition to be seated in the 90th Congress; House Select Committee investigation of Powell’s conduct and possible misuse of public funds, and recommendation to censure Powell.

Principal Correspondents: Emanuel Celler; Joan Franklin; William A. Geoghegan; Jean Camper Cahn; Robert L. Carter; Hubert T. Delany; Arthur Kinoy; William M. Kunstler; Frank D. Reeves; Herbert O. Reid Sr.; Henry R. Williams.

0157 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, March 1967. Major Topics: House debate on seating of Adam Clayton Powell; House Select

Committee investigation of Powell’s conduct and possible misuse of public funds, and recommendation to censure Powell; House vote to exclude Powell from the 90th Congress; suit brought by Powell and residents of New York’s 18th congressional district regarding seating of Powell in the 90th Congress; voting rights of persons in New York’s 18th congressional district; separation of powers.

Principal Correspondents: Arthur Kinoy; William M. Kunstler. 0334 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, April 1967.

Major Topics: Voting rights; separation of powers; constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine qualifications of its members; House Select Committee investigation of Powell’s activities and possible misuse of public funds, and recommendation to censure Powell; House vote to exclude Powell from the 90th Congress; due process of law.

Principal Correspondent : William M. Kunstler. 0467 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, May 1967.

Major Topics: House vote to exclude Adam Clayton Powell from 90th Congress; Emanuel Celler; voting rights; House Select Committee investigation of Powell; constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine qualifications of its members; constitutional prohibition against bills of attainder; separation of powers.

Principal Correspondent : Max O. Truitt Jr. 0625 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, June–December 1967.

Major Topics: House Select Committee investigation of Adam Clayton Powell and recommendation to censure Powell; House vote to exclude Powell from 90th Congress; separation of powers; constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine qualifications of its members; due process of law; voting rights.

Principal Correspondents: Frank D. Reeves; Arthur Kinoy. 0762 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, 1968.

Major Topics: Constitutional prohibition against bills of attainder; separation of powers; House vote to exclude Adam Clayton Powell from 90th Congress.

Principal Correspondents: William M. Kunstler; Edward Bennett Williams.

Page 34: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

13

Group V, Box 375 0807 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, 1969 (1 of 2).

Major Topics: House Select Committee investigation of Adam Clayton Powell and recommendation to censure Powell; House vote to exclude Powell from 90th Congress; separation of powers; constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine qualifications of its members; due process of law.

Reel 11 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. 0001 Powell v. McCormack—General Case Material, 1969 (2 of 2).

Major Topic: Constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine qualifications of its members.

0071 Powell v. McCormack—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, 1966–1969 (1 of 4). Major Topic: Constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine

qualifications of its members. 0191 Powell v. McCormack—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, 1966–1969 (2 of 4). 0251 Powell v. McCormack—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, 1966–1969 (3 of 4).

Major Topic: Constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine qualifications of its members.

0369 Powell v. McCormack—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, 1966–1969 (4 of 4). Major Topic: Constitutional power of House of Representatives to determine

qualifications of its members.

Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont. Maine

Group V, Box 905 0516 Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. Ingraham, 1971.

Major Topic: Rejection of Elks application for renewal of liquor license because of racial discrimination by the Elks.

Principal Correspondent : Charles E. Carter. 0586 Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. Ingraham, 1972.

Major Topics: Rejection of Elks application for renewal of liquor license because of racial discrimination by the Elks; right to privacy and private social clubs; Maine statute prohibiting discrimination by membership organizations or by corporations holding licenses for serving food or liquor.

Principal Correspondent : Charles E. Carter. 0742 Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. Ingraham, 1973 and undated.

Major Topics: Rejection of Elks application for renewal of liquor license because of racial discrimination by the Elks; right to privacy and private social clubs; Maine statute prohibiting discrimination by membership organizations or by corporations holding licenses for serving food or liquor; NAACP amicus curiae brief; Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis (right to privacy and private social clubs).

Principal Correspondent : Charles E. Carter.

Page 35: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

14

Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont. Massachusetts

Group V, Box 931 0867 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General,

1922, 1940, and 1959–1962. Major Topics: Population of African Americans in Springfield in 1922; employment;

religious, fraternal, and benevolent organizations; schools; crime; housing; public welfare; Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination; Massachusetts laws against discrimination in employment, housing, education, and public accommodations; Springfield public school system financial, enrollment, and attendance statistics; Springfield School Committee rules and regulations.

0996 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General, 1963.

Major Topics: Springfield public school system financial, enrollment, and attendance statistics; school districts; services for students; student-teacher ratios.

Reel 12 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Massachusetts cont. Group V, Box 931 cont. 0001 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General,

January–September 1964. Major Topics: Springfield School Committee meeting minutes; racially balanced

schools; school districts; specifications for a proposed school in Brightwood area. Principal Correspondent : William D. Toole.

0185 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General, October 1964.

Major Topics: Student-teacher ratios; special activities for elementary school students.

Group V, Box 932 0204 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General,

December 1964. Major Topics: Plans for new school in Brightwood area; Springfield NAACP

opposition to proposed site for school in Brightwood area; racial imbalance in Springfield schools.

0231 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General, 1965–1968.

Major Topics: De facto segregation; list of schools with court-ordered or voluntary desegregation plans; Springfield school desegregation plans; Cato v. Parham (school desegregation in Jefferson County, Ark.).

Principal Correspondents: Henry Weissman; John E. Deady; Owen B. Kiernan; Bettye Frederic.

Page 36: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

15

0423 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General, 1969.

Major Topics: Springfield school desegregation plans; Springfield school plans and projections for the 1970s; Springfield Inner-City Learning Center proposal; federally funded education projects in Springfield.

Principal Correspondents: John E. Deady; Theodore J. Parker; Neil V. Sullivan. 0520 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General,

January–April 1970. Major Topics: School desegregation; Springfield School Committee meeting minutes;

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education (school desegregation, Pasadena, Calif.); Davis v. School District of the City of Pontiac (school desegregation, Pontiac, Mich.).

Principal Correspondents: Neil V. Sullivan; John E. Deady; Frank H. Freedman. 0605 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General,

May–December 1970. Major Topics: School desegregation; school construction and renovations. Principal Correspondents: John E. Deady; William B. Black; Neil V. Sullivan; Frank

H. Freedman. 0720 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Background Information: General,

1971 and undated. Major Topics: School desegregation; school construction plans; Davis v. School

District of the City of Pontiac (school desegregation, Pontiac, Mich.); Massachusetts Racial Imbalance Law; Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination; Massachusetts laws against discrimination in employment, education, housing, and public accommodations; housing desegregation.

Principal Correspondents: Frederick Simmons; Roger Williams; Melrose Watkins; Melvin Smith; Neil V. Sullivan; Theodore J. Parker; Judith Lee; Charles Glenn; Frank H. Freedman; J. Harold Flannery; Clarence Norcott; Oscar Bright; James Hennessey; Carmenceita P. Jones; Jeanne Bass; Christine Williams.

0911 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Depositions: Alice B. Beal [Deputy Superintendent of Schools], 1964.

Major Topics: Springfield elementary schools; class size; hiring and assignment of teachers; standardized testing.

Reel 13 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Massachusetts cont. Group V, Box 933 0001 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee—Depositions: Helen N. Theinert

[Director of Research and Public Information], 1964. Major Topics: School districts; student enrollment; school capacity; standardized

testing.

Group V, Box 938 0186 Blakely v. Boston School Committee—General Case Material, 1963–1964.

Major Topics: Boston NAACP branch meetings and plans for demonstration in front of the Boston School Committee offices; de facto segregation; Massachusetts Board of Education; NAACP plans for school boycott; Louise Day Hicks.

Page 37: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

16

Principal Correspondents: David Nelson; Richard Banks; Kenneth I. Guscott; Tom Atkins; June Shagaloff; Edward W. Brooke.

0304 Blakely v. Boston School Committee—Background Information, 1964. Major Topics: Springfield schools; meeting of the Massachusetts Advisory

Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights regarding Boston schools; school desegregation; neighborhood schools; de facto segregation.

0446 Blakely v. Boston School Committee—General Case Material, 1965–1966 and undated.

Major Topics: School capacity; school desegregation; Boston NAACP branch. Principal Correspondents: Barbara A. Morris; Tom Atkins; Charles A. Pinderhughes.

0499 Blakely v. Boston School Committee—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes: General, undated.

Major Topics: School desegregation; school enrollment statistics. 0616 Blakely v. Boston School Committee—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes: Interviews, 1965

and undated. Major Topic: Interviews with parents of school children.

Group V, Box 978 0721 Davis v. Springfield Education Association, 1972–1973.

Major Topics: Racial discrimination by president of Springfield Education Association in selecting persons for nominating committee; Massachusetts Teachers Association.

Principal Correspondents: Girlie L. A. Davis; James I. Meyerson; Margaret King; William P. Haubner.

Group V, Box 979 0788 Griffin v. Ryan—Background Information, 1963–1967 and undated.

Major Topics: Freedom of speech and assembly; demonstrations in Jackson, Miss.; Commonwealth v. Bright; searches and seizures; arrests; Springfield police; possession of narcotics; demonstration against police brutality on steps of Springfield city hall; Council of Organizations for Civil Rights.

Principal Correspondent : Lewis M. Steel. 0956 Griffin v. Ryan—General Case Material, 1965.

Major Topics: Council of Organizations for Civil Rights; demonstration against police brutality on steps of Springfield city hall; arrests; possession of narcotics; freedom of speech and assembly and to petition government for redress of grievances.

Principal Correspondents: Lewis M. Steel; Henry Weissman.

Reel 14 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Massachusetts cont. Group V, Box 979 cont. 0001 Griffin v. Ryan—General Case Material, January–March 1966.

Major Topics: Admissibility of motion pictures as evidence; demonstration against police brutality on steps of Springfield city hall; arrests; possession of narcotics; CORE.

Principal Correspondents: Lewis M. Steel; Henry Weissman; Joan Franklin; Robert L. Carter.

Page 38: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

17

0062 Griffin v. Ryan—General Case Material, April 1966. Major Topics: Police brutality; Council of Organizations for Civil Rights;

demonstration against police brutality on steps of Springfield city hall; arrests; possession of narcotics; power and duty of police to maintain public order.

Principal Correspondent : Lewis M. Steel. 0144 Griffin v. Ryan—General Case Material, May–December 1966.

Major Topics: Freedom of speech and assembly, and to petition government for redress of grievances; CORE; Council of Organizations for Civil Rights; demonstration against police brutality on steps of Springfield city hall; arrests.

Principal Correspondent : Lewis M. Steel. 0199 Griffin v. Ryan—General Case Material, 1967–1969 and undated.

Principal Correspondent : Lewis M. Steel.

Group V, Box 980 0253 Landrum v. Richardson, 1967.

Major Topics: Arrests; assault and battery upon a police officer; disturbing the peace; inciting to riot; trespassing; demonstration by Mothers for Adequate Welfare; police brutality.

0279 Morales v. Pelletier, 1970–1971. Major Topics: New Bedford police; police brutality. Principal Correspondents: Henry F. Owens III; Nathaniel R. Jones; Ronald D.

Harper. 0342 School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Education, 1974.

Major Topics: School desegregation; Massachusetts Racial Imbalance Law.

Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont. New Hampshire

Group V, Box 1307 0396 State of New Hampshire v. Sprague, 1964.

Major Topic: Discrimination in public accommodations.

Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont. New Jersey

Group V, Box 1308 0430 Adams v. Hughes, 1967.

Major Topics: New Jersey State Police; New Jersey National Guard; Plainfield police; searches and seizures.

0527 Beaman v. Board of Education—Background Information, 1964–1970. Major Topics: Hackensack public schools; enrollment statistics.

0569 Beaman v. Board of Education—“Blueprint for Progress,” April 1965 (1 of 2). Major Topics: Hackensack public schools; educational programs; students; teachers.

0687 Beaman v. Board of Education—“Blueprint for Progress,” April 1965 (2 of 2). Major Topics: Hackensack public schools; students; teachers; school desegregation

proposals; attitudes toward desegregation.

Page 39: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

18

Group V, Box 1309 0801 Beaman v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1966.

Major Topics: Hackensack public schools; school desegregation. Principal Correspondent : Carlos Peay Jr.

0913 Beaman v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1967–1970. Major Topics: Hackensack public schools; school desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Carlos Peay Jr.; Barbara A. Morris.

0936 Beaman v. Board of Education—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, undated. Major Topics: Hackensack public schools; school desegregation.

Reel 15 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

New Jersey cont. Group V, Box 1309 cont. 0001 Board of Education v. Bonastia—Background Information: Newspaper Clippings,

1971–1974. Major Topics: School busing; Better Education for All Montclair Inc.; school budget;

Peter J. Bonastia (Montclair mayor); Montclair Town Commission; Carl L. Marburger (New Jersey commissioner of education); Montclair Board of Education; school desegregation; Organization for Black Unity; Montclair NAACP branch.

0083 Board of Education v. Bonastia—General Case Material, 1973. Major Topics: School desegregation; New Jersey Board of Education; Montclair

Town Commission; school busing; Montclair NAACP branch; school budget; HEW.

Principal Correspondents: William J. Ewing; James I. Meyerson; L. Maynard Catchings; Andrew T. Berry.

0186 Board of Education v. Bonastia—General Case Material, January–March 1974. Major Topics: School desegregation; neighborhood schools; school budget; school

busing. Principal Correspondent : Rodney S. Dayan.

0305 Board of Education v. Bonastia—General Case Material, May–June 1974. Major Topics: School desegregation; school busing; school budget. Principal Correspondent : James I. Meyerson.

Group V, Box 1310 0368 Board of Education v. Bonastia—General Case Material, undated.

Major Topics: Montclair NAACP branch; school desegregation; school busing. 0403 Board of Education v. Bonastia—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes, 1973 and undated.

Major Topics: School desegregation; school busing. Principal Correspondent : Robert B. Shepard Jr.

Group V, Box 1325 0449 Elliot v. Board of Education—Background Information: General, 1963–1968 and

undated. Major Topics: School desegregation; Neptune Township schools; racial distribution in

Neptune Township schools; school busing; Asbury Park–Neptune NAACP branch.

Page 40: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

19

0580 Elliot v. Board of Education—Background Information: Neptune Township School Booklets, 1961–1964.

Major Topics: Organization of Neptune Township schools; student enrollment. 0654 Elliot v. Board of Education—Background Information: Neptune Township School

Booklets, 1964–1965. Major Topics: Organization of Neptune Township schools; student enrollment.

0742 Elliot v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1964. Major Topics: Student enrollment; Advisory Committee on Racial Imbalance. Principal Correspondent : June Shagaloff.

0761 Elliot v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1965. Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Joseph N. Dempsey; Robert L. Carter; Eric Groezinger.

0849 Elliot v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1966. Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Joseph N. Dempsey; Lewis M. Steel; William J.

O’Hagan Jr. 0919 Elliot v. Board of Education—General Case Material, January 1967.

Major Topics: School desegregation; student enrollment; school busing. Principal Correspondents: Lewis M. Steel; Joseph N. Dempsey.

Reel 16 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

New Jersey cont. Group V, Box 1325 cont. 0001 Elliot v. Board of Education—General Case Material, February–March 1967.

Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Lewis M. Steel; William J. O’Hagan Jr.; Joseph E.

Clayton; Joseph N. Dempsey; Eric Groezinger. 0103 Elliot v. Board of Education—General Case Material, April–December 1967.

Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Joseph N. Dempsey; Lewis M. Steel.

Group V, Box 1342 0131 Kidd v. Addonizio, 1967–1970.

Major Topics: Newark police; police brutality. Principal Correspondents: Robert L. Carter; Barbara A. Morris; Harris David.

Group V, Box 1343 0199 Marburger v. Board of Education, 1966–1967.

Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Arthur Feinstein; Robert C. Sheldon; Carl L. Marburger.

Group V, Box 1348 0291 Picatinny Arsenal, 1967–1969.

Major Topics: Employment discrimination; employment in the utilities industry. Principal Correspondents: Millicent Fenwick; Gilbert A. Schulkind; Leonard J. Hunt;

John W. Macy Jr.; Mildred Bond; Barbara A. Morris. 0466 Picatinny Arsenal, undated.

Major Topic: Employment discrimination.

Page 41: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

20

Group V, Box 1349 0561 Plainfield School Case, 1966–1967.

Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Lewis M. Steel; Jesse J. Lehman; Gordon A. Wheaton.

0694 Plainfield School Case, 1968. Major Topics: Proposal to consolidate Cherry Hill and Lawnside school districts in

Camden County; racial distribution of students in Plainfield schools; school desegregation.

Principal Correspondents: Jesse J. Lehman; Marshall C. Brown Sr.; Robert L. Carter; Thurman H. Bare.

0786 Rice v. Board of Education—Background Information: Cases, 1963–1968. Major Topics: Springfield School Committee v. Barksdale (school desegregation);

Booker v. Board of Education (school desegregation). 0823 Rice v. Board of Education—Background Information: Correspondence, 1961–

1965. Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Helen R. Halligan; June Shagaloff; Maeola Taylor; Edna

M. Isler; Robert W. Blanchard; Frances H. Carter. 0848 Rice v. Board of Education—Background Information: Desegregation, 1963–1966.

Major Topic: School desegregation.

Reel 17 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

New Jersey cont. Group V, Box 1349 cont. 0001 Rice v. Board of Education—Background Information: Montclair Schools, 1958–

1966 and undated. Major Topics: Student enrollments and building capacities; proposed reorganization

of Montclair schools; school desegregation; Montclair NAACP branch; school budget.

0113 Rice v. Board of Education—Exhibits, 1966–1968. Major Topics: School desegregation; school building capacities and student

enrollments; school districts; school busing proposal. Principal Correspondent : Donald E. Super.

Group V, Box 1350 0258 Rice v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1966.

Major Topics: School desegregation; Montclair NAACP branch demonstration in front of Board of Education building; student enrollments.

Principal Correspondents: Edna M. Isler; Barbara A. Morris; Donald E. Super; Robert W. Blanchard; Charles R. L. Hemmersley.

0364 Rice v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1967–1968. Major Topics: Rejection by New Jersey State Education Commissioner Carl L.

Marburger of proposed Montclair schools reorganization; school desegregation. Principal Correspondent : Barbara A. Morris.

0441 Rice v. Board of Education—Lawyers’ Notes and Drafts, undated. 0467 Rice v. Board of Education—Transcripts [Hearing before the Commissioner of

Education], pp. 1–150, July 1966–January 1967. Major Topics: School desegregation; William E. Payne; Donald E. Super.

Page 42: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

21

0620 Rice v. Board of Education—Transcripts [Hearing before the Commissioner of Education], pp. 151–300, July 1966–January 1967.

Major Topics: Donald E. Super; school desegregation; Robert W. Blanchard. 0771 Rice v. Board of Education—Transcripts [Hearing before the Commissioner of

Education], pp. 301–450, July 1966–January 1967. Major Topics: Robert W. Blanchard; school desegregation.

Reel 18 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

New Jersey cont. Group V, Box 1350 cont. 0001 Rice v. Board of Education—Transcripts [Hearing before the Commissioner of

Education], pp. 451–600, July 1966–January 1967. Major Topics: William E. Payne; student enrollments; school desegregation; Robert

W. Blanchard; Thomas H. Hagoort. 0152 Rice v. Board of Education—Transcripts, pp. 601–643, July 1966–January 1967.

Major Topics: Susan A. Miller; school desegregation; Donald E. Super.

Group V, Box 1351 0196 Roselle Branch NAACP v. Board of Education, 1969–1970

Major Topic: School desegregation. Principal Correspondents: John L. Fredericks; Eric Groezinger.

Group V, Box 1364 0271 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Background Information, 1970–1971 and undated.

Major Topics: Rahway schools boycott; arrest of John H. Stokes for speeding, resisting arrest, and assault and battery on a police officer; police brutality; Rahway NAACP branch; Rahway High School students.

0303 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—General Case Material, 1970. Major Topic: Lawyers and legal services.

0323 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—General Case Material, 1971. Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; lawyers and legal services;

conviction of John H. Stokes for assault and battery on a police officer; Rahway Board of Education; Rahway High School teachers and students.

Principal Correspondents: Dorothy Schleifer; John H. Stokes; Robert J. Cardonsky; Haywood Burns; Jack Mandell; Leo Kahn; William D. Wells; James I. Meyerson; Richard R. Streeter.

0490 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—General Case Material, February 1972. Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; assault and battery on a police

officer; Rahway High School students; police brutality; arrests; Rahway Board of Education; Rahway High School teachers; intimidation and harassment.

0630 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—General Case Material, March–September 1972. Major Topics: Assault and battery on a police officer; Rahway High School students;

arrests; Rahway Board of Education; intimidation and harassment. Principal Correspondent : James I. Meyerson.

Group V, Box 1365 0747 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, March 5, 1970.

Major Topics: Assault and battery on a police officer; Louis Garay; arrests; John Robert Stefanick.

Page 43: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

22

0795 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, June 1, 1970 (1 of 2). Major Topics: Louis Garay; Rahway police; arrests.

0896 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, June 1, 1970 (2 of 2). Major Topics: John Robert Stefanick; Rahway police; arrests; John DeStefano; Louis

Garay; William F. Davis; Rahway High School students; Warren W. Argentiere.

Reel 19 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

New Jersey cont. Group V, Box 1365 cont. 0001 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, June 3, 1970 (1 of 2).

Major Topics: Robert W. Berger; Rahway High School teachers; Charles R. Spiewak; Louis Garay; Rahway police; Rahway High School students; Donald Samis; Warren A. Hanson.

0101 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, June 3, 1970 (2 of 2). Major Topics: Warren A. Hanson; Rahway High School teachers; Wilbur Hooper Sr.;

Robert W. Berger; intimidation and harassment. 0208 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, June 9, 1970.

Major Topics: Edwin J. Dykes; Rahway High School teachers; John Keefe; intimidation and harassment; Roy Maxwell Valentine.

0363 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes, 1970–1972. Major Topics: Rahway High School students; arrest of John H. Stokes for speeding,

resisting arrest, and assault and battery on a police officer; Robert W. Berger; Wilbur Hooper Sr.; Rahway High School teachers.

Group V, Box 1366 0517 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, May 18, 1971.

Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Richard M. Nash; Rahway High School teachers.

0578 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, August 5, 1971 (1 of 2). Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Harold Johnson; Rahway High

School students and teachers; Norman Ross; Leonard W. Simmons; Harry Williams.

0678 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, August 5, 1971 (2 of 2). Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Harry Williams; Rahway High

School students; Samuel Taylor; Annie Parker; Allen Motley. 0791 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, August 6, 1971 (1 of 2).

Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Eugene Campbell; Barbara Robinson Black; Rahway High School teachers and students; Allen Motley.

Reel 20 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

New Jersey cont. Group V, Box 1366 cont. 0001 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, August 6, 1971 (2 of 2).

Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Allen Motley; Rahway High School students.

Page 44: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

23

0102 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, August 24, 1971 (1 of 2). Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Rahway High School students and

teachers. 0204 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, August 24, 1971 (2 of 2).

Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Rahway High School students and teachers.

Group V, Box 1367 0306 State of New Jersey v. Stokes—Transcripts, August 25, 1971.

Major Topics: Tenure hearing for John H. Stokes; Philip S. Bruno; Rahway High School teachers; Lester Oxman; Roy Maxwell Valentine; George C. Link; Michael Mesaros; Herbert Kinch; John J. Hummel; Rahway High School students; Rahway police; Alfred K. Frigola.

Group V, Box 1369 0454 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board of Education—Background Information,

1967–1974. Major Topics: Textbooks; reading program for preschool children; school buildings;

discrimination in education. Principal Correspondents: Robert A. Carmignani; Gregory Simms.

0525 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board of Education—General Case Material, March–July 1974.

Major Topics: Discrimination in education; employment discrimination. Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; Josephine H. Thorpe.

0633 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board of Education—General Case Material, August–November 1974.

Major Topics: Textbooks; discrimination in education; employment discrimination. Principal Correspondents: Josephine H. Thorpe; James I. Meyerson; Nathaniel R.

Jones. 0723 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board of Education—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes

[1974]. Major Topics: Discrimination in education; employment discrimination.

0805 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board of Education—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes, January 1975.

Principal Correspondent : Norman Johnson.

Group V, Box 1370 0809 Wynn v. Byrne—General Case Material, September 1967.

Major Topics: Arrests; Newark riot (July 12–16, 1967); discrimination in administration of justice; grand juries.

0926 Wynn v. Byrne—General Case Material, October–December 1967. Major Topics: Discrimination in administration of justice; Newark riot (July 12–16,

1967); arrests; grand juries. 1027 Wynn v. Byrne—General Case Material, 1968.

Major Topics: Wynn v. Lordi; discrimination in administration of justice; grand juries.

Page 45: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

24

Reel 21 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Pennsylvania Group V, Box 2203 0001 Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing Authority—Background Information, 1974.

Major Topics: Affirmative action in employment; Philadelphia Fire Department. 0017 Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing Authority—General Case Material, 1973.

Major Topics: Termination of employment; Resident Advisory Board of Philadelphia, Inc.; freedom of speech.

0058 Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing Authority—General Case Material, 1974. Major Topic: Freedom of speech. Principal Correspondents: Robert Reinstein; Nathaniel R. Jones.

0197 Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing Authority—General Case Material, undated. Major Topics: Employment; Philadelphia Fire Department; freedom of speech. Principal Correspondent : Nathaniel R. Jones.

0317 Barney v. Board of Education—Background Information, 1970 and undated. Major Topics: School desegregation; discrimination in education.

0370 Barney v. Board of Education—General Case Material, 1970–1972. Major Topics: Erie NAACP branch; discrimination in education; Clarence Mitchell;

school desegregation. Principal Correspondents: Matthew Moore; Mildred Horton; L. Steven Robinson;

Nathaniel R. Jones. 0442 Barney v. Board of Education—Lawyers’ Drafts and Notes, 1970.

Major Topic: Discrimination in education. 0477 Bolden v. Pennsylvania State Police, 1973–1975.

Major Topics: Employment discrimination; personal debt; due process.

Group V, Box 2204 0588 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks—Background Information, 1970–1972 and

undated. Major Topics: Bucks County Housing Authority; low-income housing; housing

discrimination; city and town planning; zoning and zoning laws. Principal Correspondents: Karl A. Gabler; William R. Morris; David H. Moskowitz.

0682 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks—General Case Material, 1970–1971. Major Topics: Housing discrimination; low-income housing; zoning and zoning laws. Principal Correspondent : David H. Moskowitz.

Group V, Box 2205 0800 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks—General Case Material, January–June 1972.

Major Topics: Low-income housing; housing discrimination; Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission; city and town planning; zoning and zoning laws.

Principal Correspondent : David H. Moskowitz. 0897 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks—General Case Material, July–November 1972.

Major Topics: Housing discrimination; zoning and zoning laws; low-income housing; NAACP amicus curiae brief.

Page 46: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

25

Reel 22 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Pennsylvania cont. Group V, Box 2205 cont. 0001 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks—General Case Material, 1973–1974.

Major Topic: Zoning and zoning laws. Principal Correspondent : James I. Meyerson.

0025 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks—General Case Material, undated (1 of 2). Major Topics: Housing discrimination; low-income housing; zoning and zoning laws.

0164 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks—General Case Material, undated (2 of 2). Major Topics: League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania; zoning and zoning laws.

0258 Commonwealth v. Glickman, 1972–1974. Major Topics: Employment discrimination; Pittsburgh Civil Service Commission;

Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire.

Group V, Box 2206 0345 Commonwealth v. Kreischer, 1971–1976.

Major Topics: Child custody; interracial marriage. Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; Gailey C. Keller; Roland Nicholson.

0471 Commonwealth v. Kreischer, undated. Major Topics: NAACP amicus curiae brief; child custody; interracial marriage.

0627 Commonwealth v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers—Answers to Interrogatories and Exhibits: Set I, 1972.

Major Topics: Construction machinery and equipment; Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers by-laws.

Principal Correspondents: Robert E. Emrick; Roberto Balducelli; Reese Hammond.

Group V, Box 2210 0821 Commonwealth v. Lyon, 1973–1974.

Major Topic: HUD housing subsidies and rent supplement programs.

Group V, Box 2211 0864 Commonwealth v. O’Neill, 1972.

Major Topics: Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers; construction machinery and equipment; vocational training; Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination.

Principal Correspondents: Henry W. Sawyer III; William D. Wells.

Reel 23 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Pennsylvania cont. Group V, Box 2211 cont. 0001 Commonwealth v. O’Neill, 1973–1977.

Major Topics: Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination. 0051 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—Background Information, 1974 and undated.

Major Topics: Abuse of power by public officials; Ohio reapportionment plan; attorneys’ fees; eligibility for state welfare benefits; Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination.

Page 47: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

26

0166 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—General Case Material, January–April 1971. Major Topics: Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination;

affirmative action in employment. Principal Correspondent : Henry W. Sawyer III.

0283 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—General Case Material, May–July 1971. Major Topics: Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination; EEOC.

0406 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—General Case Material, January–July 1972. Major Topics: Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination;

affirmative action in employment. Principal Correspondent : Robert Reinstein.

0486 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—General Case Material, August–November 1972. Major Topics: Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination;

affirmative action in employment. Principal Correspondent : William D. Wells.

Group V, Box 2212 0626 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—General Case Material, December 1972.

Major Topics: NAACP amicus curiae brief in Commonwealth v. O’Neill; Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination; affirmative action in employment; EEOC amicus curiae brief in Commonwealth v. O’Neill.

0777 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—General Case Material, 1973–1975. Major Topics: Philadelphia Fire Department; employment discrimination; affirmative

action in employment. 0905 Commonwealth v. Rizzo—General Case Material, undated.

Major Topics: Philadelphia Police Department; employment discrimination; affirmative action in employment.

0977 Commonwealth v. Sebastian, 1972–1973. Major Topics: Penn Hills Police Department; employment discrimination; affirmative

action in employment. Principal Correspondent : Michael Louik.

Reel 24 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Pennsylvania cont. Group V, Box 2212 cont. 0001 Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor, 1970.

Major Topics: Employment discrimination in construction industry; Philadelphia Plan; Executive Order 11246; Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968; Office of Federal Contract Compliance; Civil Rights Act of 1964.

0047 Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor, February–June 1971.

Major Topics: Philadelphia Plan; Executive Order 11246; Civil Rights Act of 1964; construction industry; affirmative action in employment; Office of Federal Contract Compliance.

Principal Correspondent : William D. Wells. 0175 Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor, July 1971.

Major Topics: NAACP amicus curiae brief; construction industry; employment discrimination; Executive Order 11246; Philadelphia Plan; affirmative action in employment.

Page 48: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

27

0246 Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor, undated. Major Topics: Philadelphia Plan; employment discrimination; construction industry;

Civil Rights Act of 1964; Executive Order 11246.

Group V, Box 2213 0287 Erie Human Relations Commission v. Tullio, 1973 and undated.

Major Topics: Employment discrimination; Erie Police Department; affirmative action in employment; Erie NAACP branch.

Principal Correspondents: Jesse Thompson; Ray Crumbly. 0409 Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 1962.

Major Topics: Employment discrimination; working conditions. 0425 Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 1973

Major Topics: Employment discrimination; United Political Action Committee; United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO.

Principal Correspondent : James C. Kennedy Jr. 0525 Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., January–April 1974.

Major Topics: United Political Action Committee; employment discrimination; United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO.

Principal Correspondents: W. T. M. Johnson; William H. Ewing; Grover Smith Jr. 0633 Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., May–December 1974.

Major Topics: United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO; employment discrimination; United Political Action Committee.

Principal Correspondents: W. T. M. Johnson; Edwin D. Wolf; C. H. Butler; William D. Wells; William H. Ewing.

0731 Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 1975–1976 and undated. Major Topics: United Political Action Committee; employment discrimination; United

Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO. Principal Correspondents: William D. Wells; C. H. Butler; W. T. M. Johnson.

0777 Herd v. Rizzo, 1967. Major Topics: Juvenile delinquency; freedom of speech and assembly; police

brutality; demonstration by students.

Group V, Box 2214 0796 Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp., 1973.

Major Topics: Puerto Rican Fraternity of Philadelphia; employment discrimination; Gas Fitter–Utility Employee Local Union No. 600; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

Principal Correspondents: Michael Cox; Elmer Jones Jr.; William Lee Akers.

Group V, Box 2218 0837 NAACP v. City of Johnstown, 1968–1973 and undated.

Major Topics: Funding for HUD Workable Program and Neighborhood Development Program; citizen participation in HUD Workable Program; Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964; housing discrimination; Johnstown NAACP branch.

Principal Correspondents: Samuel C. Jackson; William R. Morris; Charles A. Collins; B. T. DuPont; Charles J. Lieberth.

Page 49: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

28

Reel 25 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Pennsylvania cont. Group V, Box 2218 cont. 0001 NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School District, 1969–1970.

Major Topics: School desegregation; Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colo.; Allen v. Board of Public Instruction of Broward County; plans to close Washington Elementary School to end racial imbalance in Greater Johnstown School District; Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission; student enrollments.

Principal Correspondents: David H. Kurtzman; E. E. Smith. 0142 NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School District, 1971–1973.

Major Topics: School desegregation and busing; Washington Elementary School; Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.

Principal Correspondents: James I. Meyerson; Wendell G. Freeland; Hope B. Johnson.

0202 NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School District, undated. Major Topics: School desegregation; North Carolina student dismissal laws; school

busing; closing of Washington Elementary School. 0295 NAACP v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission, 1971–1972.

Major Topics: Philadelphia Electric Company; employment discrimination; Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission; electric power rates.

Principal Correspondent : Homer C. Floyd. 0352 North Philadelphia Branch of the NAACP v. School District, 1974.

Major Topic: School desegregation.

Group V, Box 2220 0384 Russell v. Moody, 1970–1971.

Major Topic: Philadelphia Plan. 0399 Stanton Land Co. v. City of Pittsburgh, 1963.

Major Topics: Pennsylvania Equal Rights Council; Allegheny County Council on Civil Rights; housing discrimination.

Group V, Box 2221 0415 University City Citizens Development Corp. v. Redevelopment Authority, 1966.

Major Topic: Urban renewal.

Group V, Box 2222 0447 Upper St. Clair Township v. Commonwealth—Transcript, Volume I, 1972–1975.

Major Topics: Zoning and zoning laws; real estate business; public parks; taxation.

Reel 26 Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont.

Pennsylvania cont. Group V, Box 2222 cont. 0001 Upper St. Clair Township v. Commonwealth—Transcript, Volume II, 1972–1975.

Major Topics: Zoning and zoning laws; city and town planning; Pittsburgh Regional Planning Association; roads; housing; public buildings; schools; public parks and recreational facilities.

Page 50: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

Frame No.

29

0237 Walton v. Eaton, 1972–1974. Major Topic: Employment discrimination. Principal Correspondents: Carol J. Walton; Lois Barksdale.

Group V, Box 2223 0279 Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 1972–1975.

Major Topic: Employment discrimination and unemployment compensation.

Group V, Legal Department Case Files cont. Rhode Island

Group V, Box 2223 cont. 0366 Delgado v. Veterans Administration Hospital, 1965–1967.

Major Topic: Employment discrimination. Principal Correspondents: Bernardino Delgado; Claire H. Read; James D. McDaniel

Jr.; J. J. Cox; Robert L. Carter. 0424 Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co., 1967–1973 and undated.

Major Topics: Affirmative action in employment; construction industry; Providence NAACP branch; employment discrimination; Federal Highway Administration; highway construction; International Union of Operating Engineers; International Association of Bridge, Structural, and Ornamental Iron Workers; Carpenters District Council; Joseph A. Doorley.

Principal Correspondents: Bernardino Delgado; Joseph G. LeCount; William D. Wells; Nathaniel R. Jones.

0593 NAACP v. Rhode Island Chapter NAACP, 1969–1970. Major Topics: Illegal use of National Association for the Advancement of Colored

People as part of corporate name; trademark infringement. Principal Correspondents: Joseph G. LeCount; Gloster B. Current.

Page 51: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine
Page 52: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

31

PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENTS INDEX The following index is a guide to the major correspondents in this microform publication. The

first number after each entry refers to the reel, while the four-digit number following the colon refers to the frame number at which a particular file folder containing correspondence by the person begins. Hence, 6: 0657 refers to the folder that begins at Frame 0657 of Reel 6. By referring to the Reel Index, which constitutes the initial section of this guide, the researcher will find the folder title, inclusive dates, and a list of Major Topics and Principal Correspondents, listed in the order in which they appear on the film. Addlestone, David F.

6: 0657 Akers, William Lee

24: 0796 Andrews, Ben F., Jr.

2: 0670 Atkins, Tom

13: 0186, 0446 Balducelli, Roberto

22: 0627 Banks, Richard

13: 0186 Bare, Thurman H.

16: 0694 Barksdale, Lois

26: 0237 Barry, James J.

4: 0059 Bass, Jeanne

12: 0720 Bayh, Birch

6: 0755 Bellman, Richard F.

1: 0646, 0837 Berry, Andrew T.

15: 0083 Biden, Joseph R., Jr.

4: 0716 Black, William B.

12: 0605 Blanchard, Robert W.

16: 0823; 17: 0258 Bond, Mildred

16: 0291

Bright, Oscar 12: 0720

Brooke, Edward W. 13: 0186

Brown, George Albert, Jr. 4: 0232

Brown, Marshall C., Sr. 16: 0694

Burns, Haywood 18: 0323

Butler, C. H. 24: 0633, 0731

Cahn, Jean Camper 9: 0794; 10: 0001

Cardonsky, Robert J. 18: 0323

Carmignani, Robert A. 20: 0454

Carter, Charles E. 1: 0919; 4: 0059, 0232; 11: 0516, 0586,

0742 Carter, Frances H.

16: 0823 Carter, Leonard H.

3: 0979 Carter, Robert L.

9: 0261; 10: 0001; 14: 0001; 15: 0761; 16: 0131, 0694; 26: 0366

Catchings, L. Maynard 15: 0083

Celler, Emanuel 10: 0001

Chisholm, Shirley 6: 0481, 0657

Page 53: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

32

Clayton, Joseph E. 16: 0001

Cole, Albert M. 8: 0158

Collins, Charles A. 24: 0837

Cox, J. J. 26: 0366

Cox, Michael 24: 0796

Crockett, Douglas M. 2: 0844; 3: 0001, 0278

Crumbly, Ray 24: 0287

Current, Gloster B. 26: 0593

Daniel, Stephen, Jr. 6: 0481

David, Harris 16: 0131

Davis, Girlie L. A. 13: 0721

Davison, Frederic E. 6: 0835

Davison, Michael S. 6: 0755

Dayan, Rodney S. 15: 0186

Deady, John E. 12: 0231, 0423, 0520, 0605

Delany, Hubert T. 10: 0001

Delgado, Bernardino 26: 0366, 0424

Dempsey, Joseph N. 15: 0761, 0849, 0919; 16: 0001, 0103

Dikeman, James M. 9: 0261

DuPont, B. T. 24: 0837

Durian, Ronald S. 6: 0290

Dziamba, John A. 3: 0166, 0278, 0400, 0506

Eastland, Rene 3: 0759

Emrick, Robert E. 22: 0627

Ewing, William H. 24: 0525, 0633

Ewing, William J. 15: 0083

Feinstein, Arthur 16: 0199

Fenwick, Millicent 16: 0291

Flannery, J. Harold 2: 0844; 4: 0568; 12: 0720

Floyd, Homer C. 25: 0295

Franklin, Joan 2: 0511; 5: 0267; 9: 0794; 10: 0001;

14: 0001 Frederic, Bettye

12: 0231 Fredericks, John L.

18: 0196 Freedman, Frank H.

12: 0520, 0605, 0720 Freeland, Wendell G.

25: 0142 Froehlke, Robert F.

6: 0001 Fuentes, Sonia Pressman

4: 0373 Gabler, Karl A.

21: 0588 Geoghegan, William A.

10: 0001 Glenn, Charles

12: 0720 Granados, Joseph R.

8: 0294 Groezinger, Eric

15: 0761; 16: 0001; 18: 0196 Guscott, Kenneth I.

13: 0186 Halligan, Helen R.

16: 0823 Hammond, Reese

22: 0627 Harper, Ronald D.

14: 0279 Harvey, Sanford W., Jr.

6: 0001; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320 Haubner, William P.

13: 0721 Hemmersley, Charles R. L.

17: 0258

Page 54: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

33

Hennessey, James 12: 0720

Holden, Anna 5: 0267

Hollis, C. Arthur 4: 0786

Holmes, Nathaniel, Jr. 6: 0206; 7: 0001

Horne, Frank S. 8: 0158

Horton, Mildred 21: 0370

Huff, W. D. 9: 0261

Hughes, Harold E. 6: 0755

Humphrey, Hubert H. 6: 0481

Hunt, Leonard J. 16: 0291

Isler, Edna M. 16: 0823; 17: 0258

Jackson, Samuel C. 24: 0837

Johnson, Burton W. 8: 0743

Johnson, Hope B. 25: 0142

Johnson, Norman 20: 0805

Johnson, W. T. M. 24: 0525, 0633, 0731

Jones, Andrew L. 4: 0001, 0059

Jones, Carmenceita P. 12: 0720

Jones, Elmer, Jr. 24: 0796

Jones, Nathaniel R. 2: 0844; 3: 0001, 0166; 5: 0503;

6: 0001, 0481, 0755, 0835; 14: 0279; 20: 0633; 21: 0058, 0197, 0370; 26: 0424

Jones, William C. 2: 0001; 4: 0232

Kahn, Leo 18: 0323

Keller, Gailey C. 22: 0345

Kennedy, James C., Jr. 24: 0425

Kiernan, Owen B. 12: 0231

Killian, Robert K. 3: 0001

King, Francis J. 2: 0511

King, Margaret 13: 0721

Kinoy, Arthur 10: 0001, 0157, 0625

Kunstler, William M. 10: 0001, 0157, 0334, 0762

Kurtzman, David H. 25: 0001

Lawler, George V. 4: 0059

LeCount, Joseph G. 26: 0424, 0593

Lee, Judith 12: 0720

Lehman, Jesse J. 16: 0561, 0694

Lieberth, Charles J. 24: 0837

Louik, Michael 23: 0977

Lucas, Louis R. 2: 0844; 3: 0001, 0166

Macy, John W., Jr. 16: 0291

Mandell, Jack 18: 0323

Marburger, Carl L. 16: 0199

Marcus, Maria L. 3: 0759

Margolis, Emanuel 3: 0637

Marshall, Thurgood 8: 0158

Masterson, James T. 5: 0267

McDaniel, James D., Jr. 26: 0366

McHargh, Kenneth S. 4: 0059

Page 55: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

34

Meyerson, James I. 4: 0373, 0568, 0716; 5: 0708; 6: 0001,

0206, 0290, 0657, 0755, 0835; 7: 0001; 13: 0721; 15: 0083, 0305; 18: 0323, 0630; 20: 0525, 0633; 22: 0001, 0345; 25: 0142

Miller, Paul E. 5: 0267

Moore, Matthew 21: 0370

Morris, Barbara A. 13: 0446; 14: 0913; 16: 0131, 0291;

17: 0258, 0364 Morris, William R.

3: 0979; 4: 0001, 0059; 21: 0588; 24: 0837

Moskowitz, David H. 21: 0588, 0682, 0800

Murray, Pauli 8: 0158

Nelson, Bernard H. 9: 0261

Nelson, Cecil P. 9: 0261

Nelson, David 13: 0186

Nicholson, Roland 22: 0345

Norcott, Clarence 12: 0720

Norman, David L. 4: 0568

O'Brien, James C. 5: 0267

O'Hagan, William J., Jr. 15: 0849; 16: 0001

Orth, Paul W. 2: 0001

Owens, Henry F., III 14: 0279

Parker, Theodore J. 12: 0423, 0720

Peay, Carlos, Jr. 14: 0801, 0913

Pinderhughes, Charles A. 13: 0446

Pohlhaus, J. Francis 5: 0267, 0503; 6: 0290, 0481

Read, Claire H. 26: 0366

Reeves, Frank D. 10: 0001, 0625

Reid, Herbert O., Sr. 10: 0001

Reinstein, Robert 21: 0058; 23: 0406

Ribicoff, Abraham 4: 0001

Robinson, L. Steven 21: 0370

Rogers, Emma 4: 0716

Ronfelt, Stephen E. 8: 0223

Rose, John, Jr. 3: 0001; 4: 0232

Rousseau, Albert 3: 0637

Sawyer, David A. 8: 0223

Sawyer, Henry W., III 22: 0864; 23: 0166

Schleifer, Dorothy 18: 0323

Schulkind, Gilbert A. 16: 0291

Sellinger, Sondra 2: 0511

Senechal, James F. 5: 0611

Shagaloff, June 2: 0511; 13: 0186; 15: 0742; 16: 0823

Sheldon, Robert C. 16: 0199

Shepard, Robert B., Jr. 15: 0403

Shuman, Jerome 4: 0786

Simmons, Frederick 12: 0720

Simms, Gregory 20: 0454

Smith, Charles D. 1: 0919

Smith, E. E. 25: 0001

Smith, Grover, Jr. 24: 0525

Smith, J. Clay, Jr. 5: 0611, 0708; 6: 0001, 0755; 7: 0179

Page 56: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

35

Smith, Melvin 12: 0720

Smith, Wilber G. 1: 0766; 2: 0844

Stallworth, Vera Martin 4: 0373

Steel, Lewis M. 3: 0637; 13: 0788, 0956; 14: 0001,

0062, 0144, 0199; 15: 0849, 0919; 16: 0001, 0103, 0561

Stokes, John H. 18: 0323

Streeter, Richard R. 18: 0323

Sullivan, Neil V. 12: 0423, 0520, 0605, 0720

Super, Donald E. 17: 0113, 0258

Taylor, Maeola 16: 0823

Temple, Ralph J. 5: 0267

Thompson, Jesse 24: 0287

Thompson, Lawrence L. 4: 0001

Thorpe, Josephine H. 20: 0525, 0633

Toole, William D. 12: 0001

Truitt, Max O., Jr. 10: 0467

Tucker, Bernard 6: 0206, 0290; 7: 0001

Walton, Carol J. 26: 0237

Watkins, Melrose 12: 0720

Weissman, Henry 12: 0231; 13: 0956; 14: 0001

Wells, William D. 8: 0743; 18: 0323; 22: 0864; 23: 0486;

24: 0047, 0633, 0731; 26: 0424 Wheaton, Gordon A.

16: 0561 Wilkins, Roy

5: 0503, 0611 Williams, Christine

12: 0720 Williams, Edward Bennett

10: 0762 Williams, Henry R.

10: 0001 Williams, Julius E.

7: 0001 Williams, Roger

12: 0720 Willis, Allenstine D.

4: 0001 Wolf, Edwin D.

24: 0633

Page 57: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine
Page 58: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

37

SUBJECT INDEX The following index is a guide to the major topics in this microfilm publication. The first

number after an entry refers to the reel, while the four-digit number following the colon refers to the frame number at which the subject begins. Hence, 1: 0001 refers to the folder that begins at Frame 0001 of Reel 1. By referring to the Reel Index, which constitutes the initial section of this guide, the researcher will find the folder title, inclusive dates, and a list of Major Topics and Principal Correspondents, listed in the order in which they appear on the film. Accion Hispana, Inc. v. Town of New Canaan

1: 0001 Adams v. Hughes

14: 0430 Administration of justice

see Arrest see Courts see Crime and criminals see Criminal procedure see Discrimination in administration of

justice see Evidence see Extradition see Habeas corpus see Police

Advisory Committee on Racial Imbalance 15: 0742

Affirmative action in employment Commonwealth v. O'Neill 23: 0626 Commonwealth v. Rizzo 23: 0166,

0406, 0486, 0626, 0777, 0905 Commonwealth v. Sebastian 23: 0977 Contractors Association of Eastern

Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor 24: 0047, 0175

Erie Human Relations Commission v. Tullio 24: 0287

Executive Order 11246 8: 0223 general 21: 0001 Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction

Co. 26: 0424 see also Discrimination in employment

Agriculture, U.S. Department of 4: 0786

Aid to Families with Dependent Children Shapiro v. Thompson 4: 0350

Airlines Delta Air Lines 9: 0261

Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

21: 0001, 0017, 0058, 0197 Allegheny County Council on Civil Rights

25: 0399 Allegheny County, Pennsylvania

Upper St. Clair Township v. Commonwealth 25: 0447; 26: 0001

Allen v. Board of Public Instruction of Broward County

25: 0001 American Federation of Government Employees

Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. Phillips 8: 0251

Amicus curiae briefs Connecticut Civil Liberties Union

3: 0759 EEOC 23: 0626 NAACP 3: 0637; 5: 0219; 11: 0742;

21: 0897; 22: 0471; 23: 0626; 24: 0175

National Education Association 5: 0001 National School Boards Association

5: 0219 Argentiere, Warren W.

18: 0896 Arkansas

Cato v. Parham 12: 0231

Page 59: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

38

Army, U.S. Department of the 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492 see also Military rules and regulations

Arrest Barber, John 1: 0103, 0184 Black Caucus members 1: 0646 Boston, Mass. 14: 0253 Carmichael v. Allen 1: 0033 Foster-Bey, George 1: 0646, 0766, 0837 Newark, N.J. 20: 0809, 0926 Smith, Wilbur 1: 0184 Springfield, Mass. 13: 0788, 0956;

14: 0001, 0062, 0144 State of Delaware v. Rogers 4: 0716 Stokes, John H. 18: 0271, 0490, 0630,

0747, 0795, 0896; 19: 0363 Arson

1: 0184 Asbury Park, New Jersey

Asbury Park–Neptune NAACP branch 15: 0449

Assaults on police 14: 0253; 18: 0271, 0323, 0490, 0630,

0747; 19: 0363 Atlanta, Georgia

Carmichael v. Allen 1: 0033 Bad Kreuznach, Federal Republic of Germany

5: 0378, 0708; 6: 0481 Barber, John

1: 0033, 0103, 0184, 0387, 0497, 0601, 0646, 0766, 0837, 0850

Barber v. Kinsella 1: 0033, 0103, 0184, 0387, 0497, 0601,

0646, 0766, 0837, 0850 Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee

11: 0867, 0996; 12: 0001, 0185, 0204, 0231, 0423, 0520, 0605, 0720, 0911; 13: 0001

Barnes, Herman 1: 0601

Barney v. Board of Education 21: 0317, 0370, 0442

Beal, Alice B. 12: 0911

Beaman v. Board of Education 14: 0527, 0569, 0687, 0801, 0913, 0936

Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. Ingraham

11: 0516, 0586, 0742 Berger, Robert W.

19: 0001, 0101, 0363 Better Education for All Montclair Inc.

15: 0001 Bills of attainder

9: 0343; 10: 0467, 0762 Black, Barbara Robinson

19: 0791 Black Caucus (Hartford, Conn.)

1: 0103, 0184, 0387, 0497, 0766, 0850 Blakely v. Boston School Committee

13: 0186, 0304, 0446, 0499, 0616 Blanchard, Robert W.

17: 0620, 0771; 18: 0001 Blount v. Laird

6: 0001 Blunt, Timothy

3: 0637 Board of Education v. Bonastia

15: 0001, 0083, 0186, 0305, 0368, 0403 Bolden v. Pennsylvania State Police

21: 0477 Bonastia, Peter J.

15: 0001, 0083, 0186, 0305, 0368, 0403 Bond, Julian

9: 0271 Booker v. Board of Education

16: 0786 Boston, Massachusetts

Blakely v. Boston School Committee 13: 0186, 0304, 0446, 0499, 0616

International Association of Firefighters recruiting 8: 0675

Landrum v. Richardson 14: 0253 NAACP branch 13: 0186, 0446

Boycotts Boston NAACP branch plans, school

13: 0186 Rahway, N.J., schools 18: 0271

Bradley v. Milliken 3: 0001

Breach of the peace see Disturbing the peace

Page 60: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

39

Bridgeport, Connecticut Board of Education 2: 0055, 0473, 0511 Bridgeport Guardians v. Members of the

Bridgeport Civil Service Commission 1: 0919

Bridgeport-Stratford NAACP branch 2: 0055, 0473, 0511

Crumpton v. Chop 2: 0055, 0216, 0473, 0511

Greater Bridgeport NAACP branch 4: 0373

housing 2: 0216 Inter-Group Council 2: 0511 Park City Hospital 4: 0373 public schools 2: 0055

Bridgeport Guardians v. Members of the Bridgeport Civil Service Commission

1: 0919 Bridgeton, New Jersey

Marburger v. Board of Education 16: 0199

Bronx County, New York NAACP v. New York 9: 0001

Broward County, Florida Allen v. Board of Public Instruction of

Broward County 25: 0001 Bruno, Philip S.

20: 0306 Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. County of Bucks 21: 0588, 0682, 0800, 0897; 22: 0001, 0025, 0164

Housing Authority 21: 0588 Business and industry

see Construction industry see Employment see Iron and steel industry see Labor unions and organizations see Liquor and liquor industry see Public utilities

California NAACP v. University of California

3: 0979 savings and loan institutions 3: 0979 Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of

Education 12: 0520 Camden County, New Jersey

school districts 16: 0694 Campbell, Eugene

19: 0791

Carmichael v. Allen 1: 0033

Carpenters District Council 26: 0424

Carter, Robert L. 5: 0001

Cato v. Parham 12: 0231

Celler, Emanuel 10: 0467

Center for Urban Education 2: 0055

Cherry Hill school district (Camden County, N.J.)

16: 0694 Chicago, Illinois

8: 0675 Child custody

Commonwealth v. Kreischer 22: 0345, 0471

Children reading programs 20: 0454

Chisholm, Shirley 6: 0481, 0657

City and town planning Bucks County, Pa. 21: 0588, 0800 Upper St. Clair Township v.

Commonwealth 26: 0001 see also Urban renewal see also Zoning and zoning laws

Civil Rights Act of 1964 24: 0001, 0047, 0246, 0837

Cleveland, Ohio 8: 0675

Clubs see Membership organizations

Coatesville, Pennsylvania Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. 24: 0425,

0525, 0633, 0731 Collective bargaining agreements

8: 0646 Colorado

Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colo. 25: 0001

Commission on Civil Rights, U.S. 13: 0304

Commonwealth v. Bright 13: 0788

Page 61: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

40

Commonwealth v. County of Bucks 21: 0588, 0682, 0800, 0897; 22: 0001,

0025, 0164 Commonwealth v. Glickman

22: 0258 Commonwealth v. Kreischer

22: 0345, 0471 Commonwealth v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

22: 0627 Commonwealth v. Lyon

22: 0821 Commonwealth v. O'Neill

22: 0864; 23: 0001, 0626 Commonwealth v. Rizzo

23: 0051, 0166, 0283, 0406, 0486, 0626, 0777, 0905

Commonwealth v. Sebastian 23: 0977

Community Renewal Team (Hartford, Conn.)

1: 0103 Congress

general 6: 0657; 9: 0630 Senate 9: 0343 see also Congressional investigations see also House of Representatives

Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) 14: 0001, 0144

Congressional districts Ohio apportionment 23: 0051

Congressional investigations Powell, Adam Clayton 9: 0271, 0343,

0466, 0520, 0794; 10: 0001, 0157, 0467, 0625

Connecticut Civil Rights Commission 3: 0920 NAACP State Conference 2: 0670;

4: 0232 state law 1: 0033 Welfare Department 1: 0184; 2: 0724 see also Bridgeport, Connecticut see also Hartford, Connecticut see also New Britain, Connecticut see also New Canaan, Connecticut see also New Haven, Connecticut see also Norwalk, Connecticut see also Stratford, Connecticut

Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 1: 0033; 3: 0759

Connecticut Civil Liberties Union v. Sanders

2: 0001 Connecticut River Ecology Action Corporation

2: 0033 Connecticut Transportation Coalition v. Meskill

2: 0033 Construction industry

Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor 24: 0001, 0047, 0175, 0246

Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co. 26: 0424

Construction machinery and equipment Commonwealth v. Local Union 542,

International Union of Operating Engineers 22: 0627

Contempt of Congress 9: 0630

Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor

24: 0001, 0047, 0175, 0246 Council of Organizations for Civil Rights

13: 0788, 0956; 14: 0062, 0144 Courts

district 5: 0503, 0611 grand juries 20: 0809, 0926, 1027 jurisdiction 6: 0001, 0290; 7: 0774 military 6: 0290; 7: 0774, 0870 see also Discrimination in administration

of justice see also Habeas corpus

Crime and criminals arson 1: 0184 Connecticut 1: 0601 juvenile delinquency 24: 0777 rape 5: 0378, 0708; 6: 0481 Springfield, Mass. 11: 0867 see also Arrest see also Assaults on police see also Discrimination in administration

of justice see also Disturbing the peace see also Police

Page 62: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

41

Criminal procedure Holmes v. Laird 5: 0378, 0708; 6: 0001,

0290, 0481, 0755; 7: 0179, 0320, 0492, 0774, 0870

right against self-incrimination 9: 0630 see also Arrest see also Evidence see also Extradition

Crumpton v. Chop 2: 0055, 0216, 0473, 0511

Customs duties 9: 0630

Davis, William F. 18: 0896

Davis v. School District of the City of Pontiac

12: 0520, 0720 Davis v. Springfield Education Association

13: 0721 Debt

see Personal debt Deer Park Hotel (Newark, Del.)

4: 0699 De facto segregation

see Discrimination in education see School desegregation

Defense, U.S. Department of 5: 0503, 0611, 0708

Delaware Stanton v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours &

Co. 4: 0689 State of Delaware v. Brown 4: 0699 State of Delaware v. Rogers 4: 0716

Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission

21: 0800 Delgado v. Veterans Administration Hospital

26: 0366 Delta Air Lines

9: 0261 Demonstrations and protests

Boston, Mass. 13: 0186; 14: 0253 Hartford, Conn. 1: 0103, 0184, 0387,

0497, 0646, 0766 Jackson, Miss. 13: 0788 Montclair, N.J. 17: 0258 Springfield, Mass. 13: 0788, 0956;

14: 0001, 0062, 0144

students 24: 0777 Washington, D.C. 5: 0267 see also Boycotts see also Riots and disorders

Denver, Colorado Keyes v. School District No. 1 25: 0001

DeStefano, John 18: 0896

Detroit, Michigan Bradley v. Milliken 3: 0001

Discrimination by membership organizations

Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. Ingraham 11: 0516, 0586, 0742

Discrimination in administration of justice

Moses v. Kennedy 8: 0277 Wynn v. Byrne 20: 0809, 0926, 1027

Discrimination in education Barney v. Board of Education 21: 0317,

0370, 0442 Boston, Mass. 13: 0186 Bridgeport, Conn. 2: 0055, 0473 Connecticut Civil Liberties Union v.

Sanders 2: 0001 Hobson v. Hansen 4: 0869; 5: 0001,

0125, 0219 Massachusetts 11: 0867; 12: 0720 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board

of Education 20: 0454, 0525, 0633, 0723, 0805

see also School desegregation Discrimination in employment

Bolden v. Pennsylvania State Police 21: 0477

Bridgeport Guardians v. Members of the Bridgeport Civil Service Commission 1: 0919

Commonwealth v. Glickman 22: 0258 Commonwealth v. O'Neill 22: 0864;

23: 0001, 0626 Commonwealth v. Rizzo 23: 0051,

0166, 0283, 0406, 0486, 0626, 0777, 0905

Commonwealth v. Sebastian 23: 0977 Contractors Association of Eastern

Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor 24: 0001, 0175, 0246

Delgado v. Veterans Administration Hospital 26: 0366

Page 63: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

42

Discrimination in employment cont. Erie Human Relations Commission v.

Tullio 24: 0287 Executive Order 11246 8: 0223 Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

24: 0409 Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. 24: 0425,

0525, 0633, 0731 Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction

Co. 26: 0424 Harrison v. Butz 4: 0786 Holden v. Macy 5: 0267 Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp.

24: 0796 Massachusetts 11: 0867; 12: 0720 Moore v. District of Columbia Fire

Department 8: 0675 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire

Department 8: 0294, 0366, 0515, 0646, 0675, 0743, 0809, 0880

NAACP v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission 25: 0295

NAACP v. University of California 3: 0979

Picatinny Arsenal, N.J. 16: 0291, 0466 Stallworth v. Park City Hospital, Inc.

4: 0373 Stanton v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours &

Co. 4: 0689 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board

of Education 20: 0525, 0633, 0723 Walton v. Eaton 26: 0237 Woodson v. Unemployment

Compensation Board of Review 26: 0279

see also Affirmative action in employment

Discrimination in federal health care programs

Kantrowitz v. Weinberger 8: 0180 Discrimination in housing

Accion Hispana, Inc. v. Town of New Canaan 1: 0001

Bridgeport, Conn. 2: 0511 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks

21: 0588, 0682, 0800, 0897; 22: 0025

Hartford, Conn. 1: 0103, 0184 Massachusetts 11: 0867; 12: 0720 NAACP v. City of Johnstown 24: 0837

NAACP v. Pac 4: 0059 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk

Redevelopment Agency 3: 0759, 0920

Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain 3: 0979; 4: 0001, 0059

Stanton Land Co. v. City of Pittsburgh 25: 0399

Discrimination in public accommodations

Massachusetts 11: 0867; 12: 0720 Moissant International Airport (New

Orleans, La.) 9: 0261 State of Delaware v. Brown 4: 0699 State of New Hampshire v. Sprague

14: 0396 District courts

5: 0503, 0611 District of Columbia

see Washington, D.C. Disturbing the peace

Barber v. Kinsella 1: 0033, 0184 Connecticut state law 1: 0033 Landrum v. Richardson 14: 0253 State of Connecticut v. Harris 1: 0033 State of Delaware v. Rogers 4: 0716

Doorley, Joseph A. 26: 0424

Drugs and drug abuse 5: 0489 see also Liquor and liquor industry see also Narcotics

Due process of law 10: 0334, 0625, 0807; 21: 0477

Dykes, Edwin J. 19: 0208

Education funding 12: 0423 Hackensack, N.J. 14: 0569 standardized testing 12: 0911; 13: 0001 vocational 22: 0864 see also Discrimination in education see also Schools see also Students see also Teachers

Elections and election laws 9: 0343, 0630 see also Voting rights

Page 64: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

43

Electric power International Brotherhood of Electrical

Workers 24: 0796 NAACP v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities

Commission 25: 0295 Philadelphia Electric Company 25: 0295 rates 25: 0295

Elks see Benevolent and Protective Order of

Elks v. Ingraham Elliot v. Board of Education

15: 0449, 0580, 0654, 0742, 0761, 0849, 0919; 16: 0001, 0103

Employment Holden v. Macy 5: 0262, 0366 Horne, Frank S. 8: 0158 Philadelphia, Pa. 21: 0017, 0197 police 1: 0184 Springfield, Mass. 11: 0867 Stokes, John H. 18: 0323, 0490;

19: 0517, 0578, 0678, 0791; 20: 0001, 0102, 0204, 0306

utilities industry 16: 0291 vocational education and training

22: 0864 wages and salaries 8: 0515 working conditions 24: 0409 see also Affirmative action in

employment see also Discrimination in employment see also Labor unions and organizations

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

4: 0689; 23: 0283, 0626 Equal protection of the laws

Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency 3: 0759, 0920

Erie Human Relations Commission v. Tullio

24: 0287 Erie, Pennsylvania

Barney v. Board of Education 21: 0317, 0370, 0442

Erie Human Relations Commission v. Tullio 24: 0287

NAACP branch 21: 0370; 24: 0287 police 24: 0287

Evidence admissibility of motion pictures 14: 0001

Executive Order 11246 8: 0223; 24: 0001, 0047, 0175, 0246

Extradition 5: 0708; 7: 0001, 0590, 0754

Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co. 24: 0409

Farm Labor Service, U.S. Department of Labor

9: 0139 Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968

24: 0001 Federal Highway Administration

26: 0424 Federal-state relations

Moses v. Kennedy 8: 0277 Fire departments

Moore v. District of Columbia Fire Department 8: 0675

NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department 8: 0294, 0366, 0515, 0646, 0675, 0743, 0809, 0880

Philadelphia, Pa. 21: 0001, 0197; 23: 0777

Pittsburgh, Pa., Bureau of Fire 22: 0258 Florida

Allen v. Board of Public Instruction of Broward County 25: 0001

Fort Belvoir, Virginia 6: 0290, 0481, 0755

Foster-Bey, George 1: 0646, 0766, 0837, 0850

Fraternal and benevolent organizations Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks

v. Ingraham 11: 0516, 0586, 0742 Massachusetts 11: 0867

Freedom of Information Act 8: 0223

Freedom of speech and assembly Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing

Authority 21: 0017, 0058, 0197 Barber v. Kinsella 1: 0033, 0850 Carmichael v. Allen 1: 0033 Griffin v. Ryan 13: 0788, 0956; 14: 0144 Herd v. Rizzo 24: 0777

Frigola, Alfred K. 20: 0306

Furbish, William 1: 0387, 0497, 0646

Ganley, Thomas 1: 0387, 0497, 0646

Page 65: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

44

Garay, Louis 18: 0747, 0795, 0896; 19: 0001

Gardner, John W. 5: 0267

Gas Fitter–Utility Employee Local Union No. 600

24: 0796 Germany, Federal Republic of (West Germany)

5: 0503, 0611; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492, 0590

Goldstein, Benjamin 1: 0184

Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. 24: 0425, 0525, 0633, 0731

Government contracts Executive Order 11246 8: 0223

Government employees Local 2677, American Federation of

Government Employees v. Phillips 8: 0251

termination of 9: 0630 Government spending

OEO 8: 0251 Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.

26: 0424 Grand juries

20: 0809, 0926, 1027 Griffin v. Ryan

13: 0788, 0956; 14: 0001, 0062, 0144, 0199

Habeas corpus 6: 0001, 0206, 0290, 0481, 0755, 0835;

7: 0179, 0320, 0754, 0870 Hackensack, New Jersey

Beaman v. Board of Education 14: 0527, 0569, 0687, 0801, 0913, 0936

schools 14: 0527, 0569, 0687, 0801, 0913, 0936

Hagoort, Thomas H. 18: 0001

Hansen v. Hobson 5: 0001

Hanson, Warren A. 19: 0001, 0101

Harrison v. Butz 4: 0786

Hartford, Connecticut Barber v. Kinsella 1: 0033, 0103, 0184,

0387, 0497, 0601, 0646, 0766, 0837, 0850

Black Caucus 1: 0103, 0387, 0497, 0850

Lumpkin v. Meskill 2: 0839, 0844; 3: 0001, 0166, 0278, 0376, 0400, 0506, 0550

NAACP branch 1: 0033, 0850 police 1: 0103, 0184, 0387

Health care facilities and services see Discrimination in federal health care

programs see Hospitals see Mental health facilities and services

Health, Education, and Welfare, U.S. Department of (HEW)

5: 0262, 0267; 15: 0083 Herd v. Rizzo

24: 0777 Hernandez, Nicholas

3: 0637 Hicks, Louise Day

13: 0186 Highways, streets, and roads

24: 0001; 26: 0001, 0424 Hobson v. Hansen

4: 0869; 5: 0001, 0125, 0219 Holden, Gladys Ann

5: 0262, 0267 Holden v. Macy

5: 0262, 0267, 0366 Holmes, Nathaniel, Jr.

5: 0378, 0503, 0611, 0708; 6: 0001, 0290, 0481, 0755; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492

Holmes v. Laird 5: 0378, 0489, 0503, 0611, 0708;

6: 0001, 0206, 0290, 0481, 0657, 0755, 0835; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492, 0590, 0754, 0774, 0870; 8: 0001

Hooper, Wilbur, Sr. 19: 0101, 0363

Horne, Frank S. 8: 0158

Hospitals Delgado v. Veterans Administration

Hospital 26: 0366

Page 66: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

45

House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

9: 0520 Powell v. McCormack 9: 0271, 0343,

0466, 0794; 10: 0001, 0157, 0334, 0467, 0625, 0762, 0807; 11: 0001, 0071, 0251, 0369

rules 9: 0630 Housing

Allegheny County, Pa. 26: 0001 Bridgeport, Conn. 2: 0216, 0511 Bucks County Housing Authority

21: 0588 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk

Redevelopment Agency 3: 0759, 0906

Roodner Court Fair Rent Association 3: 0637

Springfield, Mass. 11: 0867 see also Discrimination in housing see also Low-income housing

Housing Act of 1937 9: 0189

Housing and Home Finance Agency 8: 0158

Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of (HUD)

3: 0979; 4: 0059; 9: 0189; 22: 0821; 24: 0837

Housing Authority v. Dorsey 2: 0670

Housing discrimination see Discrimination in housing

Housing subsidies Commonwealth v. Lyon 22: 0821

Hummel, John J. 20: 0306

Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance 2: 0511

International Association of Bridge, Structural, and Ornamental Iron Workers

26: 0424 International Association of Firefighters

8: 0294, 0366, 0646, 0675, 0743 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

24: 0796 International Union of Operating Engineers

22: 0627, 0864; 26: 0424

Interracial marriage Commonwealth v. Kreischer 22: 0345,

0471 Intimidation and harassment

18: 0490, 0630; 19: 0101, 0208 Iron and steel industry

Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. 24: 0425, 0525, 0633, 0731

Jackson, Mississippi demonstrations 13: 0788

James v. Powell 9: 0750

Jefferson County, Arkansas Cato v. Parham 12: 0231

Johnson, Arthur 1: 0766

Johnson, Burton W. 8: 0743

Johnson, Harold 19: 0578

Johnson v. White 2: 0724

Johnstown, Pennsylvania NAACP v. City of Johnstown 3: 0979;

24: 0837 NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School

District 25: 0001, 0142, 0202 Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp.

24: 0796 Juries

see Grand juries Juvenile delinquency

24: 0777 Kantrowitz v. Weinberger

8: 0180 Keefe, John

19: 0208 Kerrigan, John J.

1: 0387 Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colo.

25: 0001 Kidd v. Addonizio

16: 0131 Kinch, Herbert

20: 0306 Kings County, New York

NAACP v. New York 9: 0001 Kinsella, George B.

1: 0497

Page 67: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

46

Korea, Republic of (South Korea) U.S. Status of Forces Agreement

6: 0001 Labelle, John D.

1: 0766, 0850 Labor, U.S. Department of

NAACP v. United States Labor Department 9: 0139

Office of Federal Contract Compliance 24: 0001, 0047

Labor unions and organizations Carpenters District Council 26: 0424 collective bargaining agreements

8: 0646 Gas Fitter–Utility Employee Local Union

No. 600 24: 0796 International Association of Bridge,

Structural, and Ornamental Iron Workers 26: 0424

International Association of Firefighters 8: 0294, 0366, 0646, 0675

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 24: 0796

International Union of Operating Engineers 22: 0627, 0864; 26: 0424

Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. Phillips 8: 0251

Progressive Firefighters Association 8: 0294, 0366

Progressive Firemen's Association 8: 0646, 0675, 0743, 0809

United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO 24: 0425, 0525, 0633, 0731

Landrum v. Richardson 14: 0253

Langer, William 9: 0343

Law enforcement Moses v. Kennedy 8: 0277 see also Police

Lawnside school district (Camden County, N.J.)

16: 0694 Lawyers and legal services

7: 0774, 0870; 9: 0630; 18: 0303, 0323; 23: 0051

League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania

22: 0164 Leasing and renting

2: 0724; 9: 0750 see also Rent supplement programs

Legal Aid Society of Alameda County v. Bunty

8: 0223 Legislation

see Bills of attainder see State laws see U.S. statutes

Libel and slander Scott v. Connecticut NAACP State

Conference 4: 0232 Licenses and permits

11: 0516, 0586, 0742 Link, George C.

20: 0306 Liquor and liquor industry

11: 0516, 0586, 0742 Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. Phillips

8: 0251 Local 36, International Association of Fire Fighters

8: 0294, 0366, 0646, 0743 Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

22: 0627 Louisiana

New Orleans 9: 0261 Low-income housing

Bucks County, Pa. 21: 0588, 0682, 0800, 0897; 22: 0025

National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials v. Romney 9: 0189

Lukens Steel Co. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. 24: 0425,

0525, 0633, 0731 Lumpkin v. Dempsey

2: 0839, 0844 Lumpkin v. Meskill

2: 0839, 0844; 3: 0001, 0166, 0278, 0376, 0400, 0506, 0550

Page 68: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

47

Lynch, Daniel E. 1: 0766, 0850

Maine Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks

v. Ingraham 11: 0586, 0742 Marburger, Carl L.

15: 0001; 17: 0364 Marburger v. Board of Education

16: 0199 Massachusetts

Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 13: 0304

antidiscrimination laws 11: 0867; 12: 0720

Board of Education 13: 0186 Commission Against Discrimination

11: 0867; 12: 0720 New Bedford 14: 0279 Racial Imbalance Law 12: 0720;

14: 0342 Teachers Association 13: 0721 see also Boston, Massachusetts see also Springfield, Massachusetts

Mattare, Joseph H. 8: 0515, 0743

Medicaid Kantrowitz v. Weinberger 8: 0180

Membership organizations Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks

v. Ingraham 11: 0516, 0586, 0742 Memphis, Tennessee

8: 0675 Mental health facilities and services

Kantrowitz v. Weinberger 8: 0180 Mesaros, Michael

20: 0306 Michigan

Detroit 3: 0001 Pontiac 12: 0520, 0720

Military Bases in the Philippines Agreement

6: 0001 Military bases, posts, and reservations

Fort Belvoir, Va. 6: 0290, 0481, 0755 Military courts

6: 0290; 7: 0774, 0870 Military personnel

5: 0611, 0708; 6: 0001, 0481, 0657, 0755, 0835; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492, 0590, 0870; 8: 0001

Military rules and regulations 6: 0001, 0290, 0481; 7: 0492, 0870

Miller, Susan A. 18: 0152

Mississippi Jackson demonstrations 13: 0788

Mitchell, Clarence 21: 0370

Moissant International Airport (New Orleans, La.)

9: 0261 Monopolies and cartels

3: 0979 Montclair, New Jersey

Board of Education v. Bonastia 15: 0001, 0083, 0186, 0368, 0403

NAACP branch 15: 0001, 0083, 0368; 17: 0001, 0258

Rice v. Board of Education 16: 0786, 0823, 0848; 17: 0001, 0113, 0258, 0364, 0441, 0467, 0620, 0771; 18: 0001, 0152

Town Commission 15: 0001, 0083 Moore v. District of Columbia Fire Department

8: 0675 Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis

11: 0742 Morales v. Pelletier

14: 0279 Moses v. Kennedy

8: 0277 Mothers for Adequate Welfare

14: 0253 Motion pictures

admissibility as evidence 14: 0001 Motley, Allen

19: 0678, 0791; 20: 0001 NAACP v. City of Johnstown

3: 0979; 24: 0837 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire Department

8: 0294, 0366, 0515, 0646, 0675, 0743, 0809, 0880

NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School District

25: 0001, 0142, 0202 NAACP v. New York

9: 0001

Page 69: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

48

NAACP v. Pac 4: 0059

NAACP v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission

25: 0295 NAACP v. Rhode Island Chapter NAACP

26: 0593 NAACP v. United States Labor Department

9: 0139 NAACP v. University of California

3: 0979 Narcotics

possession 13: 0788, 0956; 14: 0001, 0062

Nash, Richard M. 19: 0517

Nathaniel Ely School (Norwalk, Conn.) 3: 0637

National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials v. Romney

9: 0189 National Education Association

5: 0001 National Guard

New Jersey 14: 0430 National School Boards Association

5: 0219 NATO Status of Forces Agreement

5: 0611, 0708; 6: 0001, 0481, 0657, 0755, 0835; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492, 0590; 8: 0001

Neighborhood schools 3: 0637; 13: 0304; 15: 0186, 0305

Nelson, Bernard H. 9: 0261

Neptune Township, New Jersey Asbury Park–Neptune NAACP branch

15: 0449 Elliot v. Board of Education 15: 0449,

0580, 0654, 0742, 0761, 0849, 0919; 16: 0001, 0103

Newark, Delaware Deer Park Hotel 4: 0699

Newark, New Jersey police 16: 0131 riot (July 1967) 20: 0809, 0926

New Bedford, Massachusetts 14: 0279

New Britain, Connecticut Common Council 4: 0001 NAACP branch 3: 0979 Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New

Britain 3: 0979; 4: 0001, 0059 Redevelopment Commission 3: 0979;

4: 0001, 0059 New Canaan, Connecticut

Accion Hispana, Inc. v. Town of New Canaan 1: 0001

New Hampshire State of New Hampshire v. Sprague

14: 0396 New Haven, Connecticut

Housing Authority v. Dorsey 2: 0670 NAACP branch 2: 0670

New Jersey Adams v. Hughes 14: 0430 Board of Education 15: 0083 Bridgeton 16: 0199 Camden County school districts

16: 0694 National Guard 14: 0430 Picatinny Arsenal 16: 0291, 0466 State of New Jersey v. Stokes

18: 0271–20: 0306 State Police 14: 0430 Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board

of Education 20: 0454, 0525, 0633, 0723, 0805

see also Hackensack, New Jersey see also Montclair, New Jersey see also Neptune Township, New

Jersey see also Newark, New Jersey see also Plainfield, New Jersey see also Rahway, New Jersey see also Roselle, New Jersey

New Orleans, Louisiana Moissant International Airport 9: 0261

New York County, New York NAACP v. New York 9: 0001

New York State 18th Congressional District 10: 0157 NAACP v. New York 9: 0001

North Carolina student dismissal laws 25: 0202

North Philadelphia Branch of the NAACP v. School District

25: 0352

Page 70: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

49

Norwalk, Connecticut Accion Hispana, Inc. v. Town of New

Canaan 1: 0001 Housing Authority 3: 0759 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Board of

Education 3: 0637 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk

Redevelopment Agency 3: 0759, 0906, 0920

Operation Open City 3: 0920 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Board of Education

3: 0637 Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency

3: 0759, 0906, 0920 Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain

3: 0979; 4: 0001, 0059 Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO)

8: 0251 Office of Equal Educational Opportunity

5: 0262, 0267 Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCC)

24: 0001, 0047 Ohio

Cleveland 8: 0675 reapportionment plan 23: 0051

Operation Medicare Alert 2: 0055

Operation Open City (Norwalk, Conn.) 3: 0920

Organization for Black Unity 15: 0001

Oxman, Lester 20: 0306

Park City Hospital (Bridgeport, Conn.) 4: 0373

Parker, Annie 19: 0678

Parker, Barrington 5: 0503

Pasadena, California Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of

Education 12: 0520 Payne, William E.

17: 0467; 18: 0001 Penn Hills, Pennsylvania

police 23: 0977

Pennsylvania Bolden v. Pennsylvania State Police

21: 0477 Commonwealth v. County of Bucks

21: 0588 Commonwealth v. Kreischer 22: 0345,

0471 Commonwealth v. Local Union 542,

International Union of Operating Engineers 22: 0627

Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor 24: 0001, 0047, 0175, 0246

Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. 24: 0425, 0525, 0633, 0731

Human Relations Commission 25: 0001, 0142, 0295

NAACP v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission 25: 0295

public welfare programs 23: 0051 Upper St. Clair Township v.

Commonwealth 25: 0447 Woodson v. Unemployment

Compensation Board of Review 26: 0279

see also Bucks County, Pennsylvania see also Erie, Pennsylvania see also Johnstown, Pennsylvania see also Philadelphia, Pennsylvania see also Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Equal Rights Council 25: 0399

Personal debt 21: 0477

Philadelphia Electric Company 25: 0295

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Alderman v. Philadelphia Housing

Authority 21: 0001 Commonwealth v. O'Neill 23: 0001 Commonwealth v. Rizzo 23: 0051 Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

24: 0409 Fire Department 21: 0001, 0197;

23: 0777 Herd v. Rizzo 24: 0777 Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp.

24: 0796 North Philadelphia Branch of the

NAACP v. School District 25: 0352

Page 71: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

50

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania cont. police 22: 0864; 23: 0001, 0051, 0166,

0283, 0406, 0486, 0626, 0905 Puerto Rican Fraternity of Philadelphia

24: 0796 University City Citizens Development

Corp. v. Redevelopment Authority 25: 0415

Walton v. Eaton 26: 0237 Philadelphia Plan

Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Secretary of Labor 24: 0001, 0047, 0175, 0246

Russell v. Moody 25: 0384 Philippines

Military Bases in the Philippines Agreement 6: 0001

Physicians Stallworth v. Park City Hospital, Inc.

4: 0373 Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey

16: 0291, 0466 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Bureau of Fire 22: 0258 Civil Service Commission 22: 0258 Regional Planning Association 26: 0001 Stanton Land Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

25: 0399 Plainfield, New Jersey

Booker v. Board of Education 16: 0786 police 14: 0430 school desegregation 16: 0561, 0694 students 16: 0694

Police Barber v. Kinsella 1: 0033 Bolden v. Pennsylvania State Police

21: 0477 Bridgeport, Conn. 1: 0919 Erie, Pa. 24: 0287 Hartford, Conn. 1: 0103, 0184, 0387 Newark, N.J. 16: 0131 New Bedford, Mass. 14: 0279 New Jersey State Police 14: 0430 Penn Hills, Pa. 23: 0977 Philadelphia, Pa. 22: 0864; 23: 0001,

0051, 0166, 0283, 0406, 0486, 0626, 0905

Plainfield, N.J. 14: 0430 Rahway, N.J. 18: 0795, 0896; 19: 0001;

20: 0306

Springfield, Mass. 13: 0788; 14: 0062 see also Assaults on police

Police brutality Hartford, Conn. 1: 0103, 0184, 0601,

0646, 0766 Kidd v. Addonizio 16: 0131 Landrum v. Richardson 14: 0253 Morales v. Pelletier 14: 0279 Philadelphia, Pa. 24: 0777 Rahway, N.J. 18: 0271, 0490 Springfield, Mass. 13: 0788, 0956;

14: 0001, 0062, 0144 State of Delaware v. Rogers 4: 0716

Pontiac, Michigan Davis v. School District of the City of

Pontiac 12: 0520, 0720 Population characteristics

Bridgeport, Conn. 2: 0216 see also Interracial marriage

Powell v. McCormack 9: 0271, 0343, 0466, 0520, 0630, 0750,

0794; 10: 0001, 0157, 0334, 0467, 0625, 0762, 0807; 11: 0001, 0071, 0191, 0251, 0369

Prisons Fort Belvoir, Va. 6: 0290, 0481, 0755

Privacy rights see Right of privacy

Private property 1: 0601

Private social clubs 11: 0586, 0742

Progressive Firefighters Association 8: 0294, 0366

Progressive Firemen's Association 8: 0646, 0675, 0743, 0809

Property see Private property see Public buildings see Trademark infringement

Providence, Rhode Island Grace v. M. A. Gammino Construction

Co. 26: 0424 NAACP branch 26: 0424

Public accommodations see Discrimination in public

accommodations Public buildings

1: 0601; 26: 0001

Page 72: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

51

Public housing Housing Authority v. Dorsey 2: 0670

Public parks Allegheny County, Pa. 25: 0447;

26: 0001 Public transportation

Connecticut Transportation Coalition v. Meskill 2: 0033

Public utilities employment 16: 0291 Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

24: 0409 NAACP v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities

Commission 25: 0295 Philadelphia Electric Company 25: 0295

Public welfare programs Connecticut 2: 0724 Massachusetts 11: 0867 Pennsylvania 23: 0051 Rhode Island Fair Welfare Rights

Organization v. Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services 2: 0724

Shapiro v. Thompson 4: 0350 Puerto Rican Fraternity of Philadelphia

24: 0796 Puerto Rican students

2: 0055; 3: 0637 Rahway, New Jersey

Board of Education 18: 0323, 0490, 0630

NAACP branch 18: 0271 police 18: 0795, 0896; 19: 0001;

20: 0306 police brutality 18: 0271, 0490 students 18: 0271, 0323, 0490, 0630,

0896; 19: 0001, 0363, 0578, 0678, 0791; 20: 0001, 0102, 0204, 0306

teachers 18: 0323, 0490; 19: 0001, 0101, 0208, 0363, 0517, 0578, 0791; 20: 0102, 0204, 0306

Rape 5: 0378, 0708; 6: 0481

Reading programs preschool children 20: 0454

Real estate business 25: 0447

Recreational facilities Allegheny County, Pa. 26: 0001

Religious organizations 11: 0867

Rent supplement programs Commonwealth v. Lyon 22: 0821

Resident Advisory Board of Philadelphia, Inc.

21: 0017 Rhode Island

NAACP v. Rhode Island Chapter NAACP 26: 0593

see also Providence, Rhode Island Rhode Island Fair Welfare Rights Organization v. Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services

2: 0724 Rice v. Board of Education

16: 0786, 0823, 0848; 17: 0001, 0113, 0258, 0364, 0441, 0467, 0620, 0771; 18: 0001, 0152

Right against self-incrimination 9: 0630

Right of privacy 11: 0586, 0742

Riots and disorders Hartford, Conn. 1: 0033, 0103, 0184,

0497 Newark, N.J. 20: 0809, 0926

Rogers, Emma State of Delaware v. Rogers 4: 0716

Roodner Court Fair Rent Association 3: 0637

Roselle Branch NAACP v. Board of Education

18: 0196 Roselle, New Jersey

NAACP branch 18: 0196 Roselle Branch NAACP v. Board of

Education 18: 0196 Ross, Norman

19: 0578 Rules and regulations

military 6: 0001, 0290, 0481; 7: 0492, 0870

Springfield School Committee 11: 0867 Russell v. Moody

25: 0384 Rutherford, Christine

1: 0646, 0850 Samis, Donald

19: 0001 Savings and loan institutions

California 3: 0979

Page 73: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

52

School budgets and funding Connecticut Civil Liberties Union v.

Sanders 2: 0001 Montclair, N.J. 15: 0001, 0083, 0186,

0305; 17: 0001 School buildings

Boston, Mass. 13: 0446 Montclair, N.J. 17: 0001, 0113 Springfield, Mass. 13: 0001 Trenton, N.J. 20: 0454

School busing Board of Education v. Bonastia

15: 0001, 0083, 0186, 0305, 0368, 0403

Bridgeport, Conn. 2: 0473 Elliot v. Board of Education 15: 0449,

0919 Montclair, N.J. 17: 0113 NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School

District 25: 0142, 0202 Norwalk, Conn. 3: 0637 United States v. Board of Education of

Waterbury, Conn. 4: 0568 School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Education

14: 0342 School construction

Springfield, Mass. 12: 0605, 0720 School desegregation

Allen v. Board of Public Instruction of Broward County 25: 0001

Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee 11: 0867; 12: 0001, 0204, 0231, 0423, 0520, 0605, 0720

Barney v. Board of Education 21: 0317, 0370

Beaman v. Board of Education 14: 0527, 0569, 0687, 0801, 0913, 0936

Blakely v. Boston School Committee 13: 0186, 0304, 0446, 0499, 0616

Board of Education v. Bonastia 15: 0001, 0083, 0186, 0305, 0368, 0403

Booker v. Board of Education 16: 0786 Bradley v. Milliken 3: 0001 Cato v. Parham 12: 0231 Crumpton v. Chop 2: 0473, 0511 Davis v. School District of the City of

Pontiac 12: 0520, 0720

Elliot v. Board of Education 15: 0449, 0580, 0654, 0742, 0761, 0849, 0919; 16: 0001, 0103

Hobson v. Hansen 4: 0869; 5: 0001, 0125, 0219

Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colo. 25: 0001

Lumpkin v. Meskill 2: 0839, 0844; 3: 0001, 0166, 0278, 0376, 0400, 0506, 0550

Marburger v. Board of Education 16: 0199

NAACP v. Greater Johnstown School District 25: 0001, 0142, 0202

North Philadelphia Branch of the NAACP v. School District 25: 0352

Plainfield, N.J. 16: 0561, 0694 Rice v. Board of Education 16: 0786,

0823, 0848; 17: 0001, 0113, 0258, 0364, 0441, 0467, 0620, 0771; 18: 0001, 0152

Roselle Branch NAACP v. Board of Education 18: 0196

School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Education 14: 0342

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education 12: 0520

Springfield School Committee v. Barksdale 16: 0786

United States v. Board of Education of Waterbury, Conn. 4: 0568

see also Discrimination in education Schools

Allegheny County, Pa. 26: 0001 Bridgeport, Conn. 2: 0055 Camden County, N.J. 16: 0694 Hackensack, N.J. 14: 0527, 0569, 0687,

0801, 0913, 0936 Johnstown, Pa. 25: 0001, 0142, 0202 Montclair, N.J. 17: 0001, 0113, 0364 Neptune Township, N.J. 15: 0449, 0580,

0654, 0742 Norwalk, Conn. 3: 0637 Rahway, N.J. 18: 0271 Springfield, Mass. 11: 0867, 0996;

12: 0001, 0185, 0911; 13: 0001, 0304

see also Discrimination in education see also Neighborhood schools see also School desegregation

Page 74: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

53

Scott, Shirley 4: 0232

Scott v. Connecticut NAACP State Conference

4: 0232 Searches and seizures

9: 0630; 13: 0788; 14: 0430 Segregation

see Discrimination by membership organizations

see Discrimination in education see Discrimination in employment see Discrimination in housing see Discrimination in public

accommodations see School desegregation

Senate 9: 0343

Separation of powers 10: 0157, 0334, 0467, 0625, 0762, 0807

Shapiro v. Thompson 4: 0350

Simmons, Leonard W. 19: 0578

Smith, Johnie 1: 0646, 0850

Smith, Wilbur 1: 0184

Smuck v. Hobson 5: 0001

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

12: 0520 Spiewak, Charles R.

19: 0001 Springfield Education Association

13: 0721 Springfield, Massachusetts

Barksdale v. Springfield School Committee 11: 0867, 0996; 12: 0001, 0185, 0204, 0231, 0423, 0520, 0605

Davis v. Springfield Education Association 13: 0721

demonstration against police brutality 13: 0788, 0956; 14: 0001, 0062, 0144

Griffin v. Ryan 13: 0788; 14: 0062, 0144, 0199

Inner-City Learning Center proposal 12: 0423

NAACP branch 12: 0204 police 13: 0788 School Committee of Springfield v.

Board of Education 14: 0342 schools 11: 0867, 0996; 12: 0001, 0185,

0911; 13: 0001, 0304 Springfield School Committee v.

Barksdale 16: 0786 Springfield School Committee v. Barksdale

16: 0786 Spring Street Tenants Association

3: 0759 Stallworth, Vera Martin

4: 0373 Stallworth v. Park City Hospital, Inc.

4: 0373 Stanton Land Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

25: 0399 Stanton v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.

4: 0689 State and local government employees

22: 0258 State laws

Connecticut 1: 0033 Maine 11: 0586, 0742 Massachusetts 11: 0867; 12: 0720 North Carolina 25: 0202

State of Connecticut v. Harris 1: 0033

State of Delaware v. Brown 4: 0699

State of Delaware v. Rogers 4: 0716

State of New Hampshire v. Sprague 14: 0396

State of New Jersey v. Stokes 18: 0271, 0303, 0323, 0490, 0630,

0747, 0795, 0896; 19: 0001, 0101, 0208, 0363, 0517, 0578, 0678, 0791; 20: 0001, 0102, 0204, 0306

Stefanick, John Robert 18: 0747, 0896

Page 75: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

54

Stokes, John H. 18: 0271, 0323, 0490, 0630, 0747,

0896; 19: 0001, 0101, 0208, 0363, 0517, 0578, 0678, 0791; 20: 0001, 0102, 0204, 0306; 18: 0795

Stratford, Connecticut Bridgeport-Stratford NAACP branch

2: 0055, 0473, 0511 Student enrollments

Boston, Mass. 13: 0499 Hackensack, N.J., schools 14: 0527 Johnstown, Pa. 25: 0001 Montclair, N.J. 17: 0001, 0113, 0258;

18: 0001 Neptune Township, N.J. 15: 0580, 0654,

0742, 0919 Springfield, Mass. 13: 0001

Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee

Carmichael v. Allen 1: 0033 Students

Bridgeport, Conn. 2: 0055 demonstrations 24: 0777 dismissal laws 25: 0202 Hackensack, N.J. 14: 0569, 0687 Plainfield, N.J. 16: 0694 Rahway, N.J. 18: 0271, 0323, 0490,

0630, 0896; 19: 0001, 0363, 0578, 0678, 0791; 20: 0001, 0102, 0204, 0306

Springfield, Mass. 11: 0996; 12: 0185 see also Schools see also Student enrollments

Super, Donald E. 17: 0467, 0620; 18: 0152

Taxation 25: 0447

Taylor, Samuel 19: 0678

Teachers Davis v. Springfield Education

Association 13: 0721 Hackensack, N.J. 14: 0569, 0687 Massachusetts Teachers Association

13: 0721 Rahway, N.J. 18: 0323, 0490; 19: 0001,

0101, 0208, 0363, 0517, 0578, 0791; 20: 0102, 0204, 0306

Springfield, Mass. 11: 0996; 12: 0185, 0911

Textbooks 20: 0454, 0633

Theinert, Helen N. 13: 0001

Trademark infringement NAACP v. Rhode Island Chapter

NAACP 26: 0593 Transportation

see Highways, streets, and roads see Public transportation see School busing

Treaties and agreements Military Bases in the Philippines

Agreement 6: 0001 NATO Status of Forces Agreement

5: 0611, 0708; 6: 0001, 0481, 0657, 0755, 0835; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492, 0590; 8: 0001

U.S.–Republic of Korea Status of Forces Agreement 6: 0001

Trenton Branch of the NAACP v. Board of Education

20: 0454, 0525, 0633, 0723, 0805 Trespassing

14: 0253 Tucker, Bernard

5: 0503, 0611, 0708; 6: 0001, 0290, 0481, 0755; 7: 0001, 0179, 0320, 0492

Tucker v. Froehlke 6: 0755, 0835; 7: 0320

Unemployment compensation Woodson v. Unemployment

Compensation Board of Review 26: 0279

Uniform Code of Military Justice 6: 0001, 0481

United Political Action Committee 24: 0425, 0525, 0633, 0731

United States Housing Authority 9: 0189

United States v. Board of Education of Waterbury, Conn.

4: 0568 United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO

24: 0425, 0525, 0633, 0731 University City Citizens Development Corp. v. Redevelopment Authority

25: 0415

Page 76: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

55

University of California 3: 0979

Upper St. Clair Township v. Commonwealth

25: 0447; 26: 0001 Urban renewal

NAACP v. City of Johnstown 3: 0979; 24: 0837

Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency 3: 0759, 0906, 0920

Nutmeg Housing, Inc. v. City of New Britain 3: 0979; 4: 0001, 0059

University City Citizens Development Corp. v. Redevelopment Authority 25: 0415

U.S. statutes Civil Rights Act of 1964 24: 0001, 0047,

0246, 0837 Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968

24: 0001 Freedom of Information Act 8: 0223 Housing Act of 1937 9: 0189 Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970

9: 0001 Vaccinations

2: 0055 Valentine, Roy Maxwell

19: 0208; 20: 0306 Veterans

Vietnam War 5: 0489 Veterans Administration

Delgado v. Veterans Administration Hospital 26: 0366

Vietnam War veterans 5: 0489

Vocational education and training 22: 0864

Voting rights Powell v. McCormack 10: 0157, 0334,

0467, 0625 Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970

NAACP v. New York 9: 0001 Wages and salaries

Washington, D.C., fire department 8: 0515

Walton v. Eaton 26: 0237

Washington, D.C. Hobson v. Hansen 4: 0869; 5: 0001,

0125, 0219 International Association of Firefighters

recruiting 8: 0675 Moore v. District of Columbia Fire

Department 8: 0675 NAACP v. District of Columbia Fire

Department 8: 0294, 0366, 0515, 0646, 0675, 0743, 0809, 0880

Washington Elementary School (Johnstown, Pa.)

25: 0142, 0202 Waterbury, Connecticut

United States v. Board of Education 4: 0568

Weaver, Ronald M. 1: 0850

Welfare programs see Public welfare programs

Williams, Harry 19: 0578, 0678

Williams, Joseph D. 1: 0646, 0850

Williams v. Rogers 6: 0001

Witnesses 9: 0630

Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

26: 0279 Working conditions

Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric Co. 24: 0409

Wright, J. Skelly 5: 0001

Wynn v. Byrne 20: 0809, 0926, 1027

Wynn v. Lordi 20: 1027

Zoning and zoning laws Commonwealth v. County of Bucks

21: 0588, 0682, 0800, 0897; 22: 0001, 0025, 0164

Upper St. Clair Township v. Commonwealth 25: 0447; 26: 0001

Page 77: A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of · Group V, Boxes 374–375 Powell v. McCormack.....12 Reel 11 District of Columbia cont. Group V, Box 375 cont. Powell v. McCormack.....13 Maine

BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCESMicrofilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections

Part 16.Board of Directors, Correspondenceand Committee Materials, 1919–1970

Part 17.National Staff Files, 1940–1965

Part 18.Special Subjects, 1940–1955

Part 19.Youth File

Part 20.White Resistance and Reprisals, 1956–1965

Part 21.NAACP Relations with the Modern Civil RightsMovement

Part 22.Legal Department Administrative Files, 1956–1965

Part 23.Legal Department Case Files, 1956–1972

Part 24.Special Subjects, 1956–1965

Part 25.Branch Department Files [1941–1965]

Part 26.Selected Branch Files, 1940–1955

Part 27.Selected Branch Files, 1956–1965

Part 28.Special Subject Files, 1966–1970

Part 29.Branch Department [1966–1972]

Part 30.General Office Files, 1966–1972

Part 1.Meetings of the Board of Directors, Records ofAnnual Conferences, Major Speeches, andSpecial Reports, 1909–1970

Part 2.Personal Correspondence of SelectedNAACP Officials, 1919–1939

Part 3.The Campaign for Educational Equality, 1913–1965

Part 4.The Voting Rights Campaign, 1916–1965

Part 5.The Campaign against Residential Segregation,1914–1965

Part 6.The Scottsboro Case, 1931–1950

Part 7.The Anti-Lynching Campaign, 1912–1955

Part 8.Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System,1910–1955

Part 9.Discrimination in the U.S. Armed Forces, 1918–1955

Part 10.Peonage, Labor, and the New Deal, 1913–1939

Part 11.Special Subject Files, 1912–1939

Part 12.Selected Branch Files, 1913–1939

Part 13.The NAACP and Labor, 1940–1965

Part 14.Race Relations in the International Arena, 1940–1955

Part 15.Segregation and Discrimination:Complaints and Responses, 1940–1955

PAPERS OF THE NAACP

UPA Collections from LexisNexis®

www.lexisnexis.com/academic