A Guide to Formative Assessment Astrid Fossum & Sharonda M. Harris, Mathematics Teaching Specialists...
-
Upload
kory-roberts -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
description
Transcript of A Guide to Formative Assessment Astrid Fossum & Sharonda M. Harris, Mathematics Teaching Specialists...
A Guide to Formative Assessment
Astrid Fossum & Sharonda M. Harris, Mathematics Teaching SpecialistsMilwaukee Public Schools
In this session participants will: Explore a professional development model
used to inform classroom instruction. Examine how district leaders are working with
teachers to support the use of formative assessments in mathematics.
Engage in writing effective descriptive feedback.
Research
“Improved formative assessment helps low achievers more than other students and reduces the range of achievement while raising achievement overall.”
“Firm evidence shows that formative assessment is an essential component of classroom work and that its development can raise standards of achievement.”
Black, P. & Wiliam, D (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 808(2), 139-148.
Comprehensive MathematicsFramework
ReferencesNational Research Council. (2001). Adding it up. Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral
Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.National Research Council. (2002). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Mathematics Learning Study Committee, J. Kilpatrick & J. Swafford, Editors. Center for Education, Division of Behavioral Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (1998). Wisconsin’s model academic standards for mathematics. Madison, WI: Author.
District Learning TargetsD. Measurement
Grade 6 MPS Learning Target #5
(Grade 6) MPS Learning Target #6
(Grade 6) Estimate and measure attributes of objects (including angles) and make uni t conversions within and between customary and metric systems.
Estimate and determine perimeter/circumference, area, distance, and elapsed time in real -world contexts and explain strategies.
Descriptors Measurable attributes: 1, 2 Direct measurement: 3, 5
Descriptors Direct measurement: 3, 4 Indirect measurement: 6, 7, 8
State Assessment Descriptors Wisconsin Sub -skill Descriptors (Beginning of Grade 7) Sub-skill D.a: Measurable attributes 1) Select the appropriate unit of measure to estimate the length, liquid capacity, volume,
weight/mass of everyday objects using U.S. customary and metric.
2) Convert units within a system e.g., feet to yards; ounces to pounds; inches to feet; pints to quarts. Approximate conversions of units between metric and U.S. customary systems using a model or in context (quart/liter; yard/meter).
Sub-skill D.b: Direct measurement 3) Apply appropriate tools and techniques to measure down to the nearest 1/4 -, 1/8 -, or 1/16 -
inch or nearest centimeter or millimeter.
4) Determine and compare elapsed ti me in problem -solving situations.
5) Measure and/or draw angles up to 180 degrees.
Sub-skill D.c: Indirect measurement 6) Estimate area given a reference.
7) Determine perimeter/circumference and area of squares, rectangles, triangles, parallelogram s, and circles in real -world context.
8) Determine the distance between points using a scale.
Description of Assessment:
CABS Class Summary Report
School: Teacher:
Date: Grade Level: _______Sp.Ed _______Reg.Ed
MPS Learning Target(s): State Descriptor(s):
Expectations:(What do you expect to see on student’s paper to demonstrate understanding?)
Students’ Successes: Students’ Challenges:
Next Steps:
Description of Assessment:
CABS Assessment OverviewAfter working through the assessment, reflect on what you expect students to do. Complete the following table before developing your descriptive feedback.
School: Teacher:
Date: Grade Level: ______Sp.Ed _______Reg.Ed
Identify appropriate Key Mathematics Features students may develop as a response to this assessment:
Identify misconceptions you anticipate students will demonstrate:
Identify misconceptions you observed in the students’ work:
Types of FeedbackMotivational Evaluative Descriptive Effective
Feedback is primarily motivational
Feedback is primarily evaluative
Descriptive Feedback primarily tells the student how to correct their reasoning.
Feedback asks the student what to do to move their reasoning to the next level.
Purpose: to encourage and support the learner
Purpose: to measure student achievement with a score or a grade
Purpose: to improve learning by indicating to the student what needs to be improved
Purpose: to improve learning, by moving student reasoning to the next level
More Summative More Formative
Student Feedback Summary
School: Teacher:
Date: Grade Level: _______Sp.Ed _______Reg.Ed
Student Name:
Descriptive Feedback to Student(Frame with language to students that challenges them to revise, redo, relearn, or expand.)
Summary of Instructional Decisions(How much re-teaching is needed? What follow-up is needed? Do my lesson plans need to be revised?)
Description of Assessment:
Successes Teacher
Conversations around student work
Identify different student strategies
Increased understanding of formative assessment
Instructional decisions based on identified misconceptions and challenges
Descriptive Feedback can save on re-teaching time
Student Increased achievement Ability to clear up
misconceptions on second attempts, without re-teaching/intervention
Self-reflection on ways to improve their work
Increased involvement in self-assessment
Challenges Teacher
Buy-In Time commitment Record-keeping Grading Redundancy
Student Interpretation of the
feedback Looking for a grade Lack of motivation
The Learning Team Continuum
PastPresentFuture
Resources Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box:
Raising standards through assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Brookhart, S.M., (2007). Feedback That Fits. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 54-59.
Stiggins, R.J., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2005). Assessment FOR Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.