A Granular Light Bridge Observed by Hinode: Evidence for Naked Granules · A Granular Light Bridge...
Transcript of A Granular Light Bridge Observed by Hinode: Evidence for Naked Granules · A Granular Light Bridge...
A Granular Light Bridge Observed by Hinode:
Evidence for Naked Granules
Andreas Lagg, Sami K. Solanki, Michiel van Noort
Max Planck Institute for Solar System ResearchKatlenburg-Lindau∗, Germany(*) February 2014: Gottingen
Hinode 7, 12-Nov-2013
1 / 20
Introduction Light Bridges
Light Bridges
Shimizu (2011)
separate umbrae in two magnetically
similar polarity regions
source: convective motions
weak field plasma penetrates from
below photosphere
cusp/canopy configuration at surface
types: FLBs, SLBs, GLBs
→ different origins?
Light Bridge References
Sobotka & Puschmann (2009); Sobotka et al. (1993); Lites et al. (1991); Sobotkaet al. (1993); Rimmele (2008); Rezaei et al. (2012); Vazquez (1973); Lites et al.(1991); Sobotka et al. (1994); Leka (1997); Rouppe van der Voort et al. (2010);Louis et al. (2009); Bharti et al. (2013); Shimizu et al. (2009); Ruedi et al. (1995);Joshi (2013)
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
GREGOR BBI AR11768 (trailing) 08:15 UT, frame #000
−0 10 20 30 40 50x [arcsec]
0
10
20
30
40
50
y [a
rcse
c]
GREGOR BBI 486 nm, 14-Jun-20133 / 20
Observations Hinode SP: 2006-Nov-30
AR10926, G-band, temporal evolution
500
1000
1500
20002006−11−30T07:40:30.525
−160 −140 −120 −100 −80x [arcsec]
−140
−120
−100
y [a
rcse
c]
4 / 20
Observations Hinode SP: 2006-Nov-30
AR10926,SOT/SP scan
−210 −200 −190 −180 −170
x [arcsec]
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
y[arcsec]
DC
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.90
1.05
1.20
I/I C
AR10926
several granular light bridges:
Nov 26 – Dec 4 2006
µ = cosΘ = 0.96
SP scan (normal mode) on
Nov-30 2006, 2300 UT
Inversions van Noort (2012)
POSTER: S1 - P - 27
spatial coupling using PSF
−→ acts as deconvolution
3 nodes in T, B, γ, φ, vLOS, vmicro
6 / 20
Method 2D-coupled Inversion
AR10926, intensity
−210 −200 −190 −180 −170
x [arcsec]
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
y[arcsec]
DC
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.90
1.05
1.20
I/I C
−210 −200 −190 −180 −170
x [arcsec]
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
y[arcsec]
DC
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.90
1.05
1.20
I/I C
8 / 20
Method 2D-coupled Inversion
AR10926, selected regions
−210 −200 −190 −180 −170
x [arcsec]
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
y[arcsec]
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
DC
−196 −195 −194
−167
−166
−165
−217 −216 −215
−187
−186
−185
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.90
1.05
1.20
I/I C
Broad light bridge
temporal evolution indicates
convective motions
brightness similar to QS
−→ granule
10 / 20
Method 2D-coupled Inversion
AR10926, selected regions
−210 −200 −190 −180 −170
x [arcsec]
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
y[arcsec]
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
DC
−196 −195 −194
−167
−166
−165
−217 −216 −215
−187
−186
−185
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.90
1.05
1.20
I/I C
Broad light bridge
temporal evolution indicates
convective motions
brightness similar to QS
−→ granule
QS Granule
. . . not really “quiet” (too close to spot).
BUT: properties very similar to QS
granule
−→ selected for comparison
10 / 20
Results Comparison: Granule in LB vs. QS
Comparison: LB Granule vs. QS Granule
−210 −200 −190 −180 −170
x [arcsec]
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
y[arcsec]
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
DC
−196 −195 −194
−167
−166
−165
−217 −216 −215
−187
−186
−185
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.90
1.05
1.20
I/I C
LB granule
33
34
35
logτ=-2.0
5000 6000
T [K]−3 0 4 8
vLOS [km s−1]
0 1000 2000
B [G]30 90 150
γ [◦] (B>70G)
33
34
35
logτ=-0.8
4 5 6
33
34
35
logτ=0.0
4 5 6 4 5 6 4 5 6
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
QS granule
13
14
15
logτ=-2.0
5000 6000
T [K]−3 0 4 8
vLOS [km s−1]
0 1000 2000
B [G]30 90 150
γ [◦] (B>70G)
13
14
15
logτ=-0.8
−17 −16 −15
13
14
15
logτ=0.0
−17 −16 −15 −17 −16 −15 −17 −16 −15
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
Atmospheric parameters
Temp., LOS-velocity, magn. field
strength & direction
at three height nodes
11 / 20
Results Comparison: Granule in LB vs. QS
Comparison LB / QS granule log τ = 0.0
Temp. vLOS B-field B-direction
4 5 6
33
34
35
logτ=0.0
5000 6000
4 5 6
−3 0 4 8
4 5 6
0 1000 2000
4 5 6
30 90 150
◦
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
−17 −16 −15
13
14
15
logτ=0.0
5000 6000
−17 −16 −15
−3 0 4 8
−17 −16 −15
0 1000 2000
−17 −16 −15
30 90 150
◦
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
LB
GQ
SG
12 / 20
Results Comparison: Granule in LB vs. QS
Comparison LB / QS granule log τ = − 0.8
Temp. vLOS B-field B-direction
4 5 6
33
34
35
logτ=-0.8
5000 6000
4 5 6
−3 0 4 8
4 5 6
0 1000 2000
4 5 6
30 90 150
◦
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
−17 −16 −15
13
14
15
logτ=-0.8
5000 6000
−17 −16 −15
−3 0 4 8
−17 −16 −15
0 1000 2000
−17 −16 −15
30 90 150
◦
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
LB
GQ
SG
12 / 20
Results Comparison: Granule in LB vs. QS
Comparison LB / QS granule log τ = − 2.0
Temp. vLOS B-field B-direction
4 5 6
33
34
35
logτ=-2.0
5000 6000
4 5 6
−3 0 4 8
4 5 6
0 1000 2000
4 5 6
30 90 150
◦
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
−17 −16 −15
13
14
15
logτ=-2.0
5000 6000
−17 −16 −15
−3 0 4 8
−17 −16 −15
0 1000 2000
−17 −16 −15
30 90 150
◦
x+200 [arcsec]
y+200[arcsec]
LB
GQ
SG
12 / 20
Results Comparison: Granule in LB vs. QS
AR10926, selected cuts
−210 −200 −190 −180 −170
x [arcsec]
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
y[arcsec]
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
DC
0.15
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.90
1.05
1.20
I/I C
Cut through LB
−2
−1
0
500G
500G
5000
6000
T[K
]
−2
−1
0
500G
500G -300
0
300
T-T
QS[K
]
−2
−1
0
500G
500G
-3
0
3
6
9
vLO
S[km
s−1]
−2
−1
0
500G
500G
0
1000
2000
B[G
]
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
500G
500G
30
90
150
γ[◦]
(B>
70G
)
Cut through QSG
−2
−1
0
5000
6000
T[K
]
−2
−1
0-300
0
300
T-T
QS[K
]
−2
−1
0 -3
0
3
6
9
vLO
S[km
s−1]
−2
−1
0 0
1000
2000
B[G
]
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
30
90
150
γ[◦]
(B>
70G
)
13 / 20
Results Vertical Cuts
Cut through LB / QS granule LOS-velocity
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
logτ
500G
500G
-3
0
3
6
9
vLO
S[km
s−1]
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
logτ
-3
0
3
6
9
vLO
S[km
s−1]
LB
GQ
SG
14 / 20
Results Vertical Cuts
Cut through LB / QS granule magnetic field
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
logτ
500G
500G
0
1000
2000
B[G
]
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
logτ
0
1000
2000
B[G
]
LB
GQ
SG
14 / 20
Results Vertical Cuts
Cut through LB / QS granule mag. field inclination
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
logτ
500G
500G
30
90
150
γ[◦]
(B>
70G
)
−1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
cut position [arcsec]
−2
−1
0
logτ
30
90
150
γ[◦]
(B>
70G
)
LB
GQ
SG
14 / 20
Results Vertical Cuts
Comparison: LB Granule vs. QS Granule
Similarities
central upflows (≈2 km s−1) of hot
material
surrounded by cooler downflows
−→ typical pattern for convection
decreasing velocities with height
field free / weak fields in deep layers
field concentrations at boundaries
15 / 20
Results Vertical Cuts
Comparison: LB Granule vs. QS Granule
Similarities
central upflows (≈2 km s−1) of hot
material
surrounded by cooler downflows
−→ typical pattern for convection
decreasing velocities with height
field free / weak fields in deep layers
field concentrations at boundaries
Differences
LB: faster downflows (10 vs. 4 km s−1)
LB: narrowing upflows with height
LB: enhanced temp. at downflows in
middle layers, lower in deepest layer
→ small radial gradient at τ = 1
LB: opposite polarity field at location of
downflows
LB: cusp-like field in highest layer
QS: canopy field in highest layer
15 / 20
Summary & Outlook
Downflows: reconnection sites?
High speed downflows (10 km s−1)
Result of Reconnection? (Louis et al. 2009)
+ hints of polarity reversal
+ above downflows: T enhanced
17 / 20
Summary & Outlook
Downflows: reconnection sites?
Configuration
U m b r a U m b r a
High speed downflows (10 km s−1)
Result of Reconnection? (Louis et al. 2009)
+ hints of polarity reversal
+ above downflows: T enhanced
17 / 20
Summary & Outlook
Downflows: reconnection sites?
Configuration
U m b r a U m b r a
High speed downflows (10 km s−1)
Result of Reconnection? (Louis et al. 2009)
+ hints of polarity reversal
+ above downflows: T enhanced
– height: 200–300 km
– strong downflows by gravity &
reduced density
→ drag field lines and create opposite
polarity field
→ reconnection / current sheets (with
heating) result of downflows
17 / 20
Summary & Outlook Exposed (“naked”) granules
“Naked” granules Summary & Outlook
Configuration
U m b r a U m b r a
Exposed granules (Wilson depression)
LBG and QSG similar in deep layer
−→ points to common origin
−→ anchored in deep layers
different from FLBs or umbral dots
(“surface” convection)
probe sub-surface spot structure
Outlook
→ investigate granular light bridges
under different viewing angles
possible to access granular interior
18 / 20
Summary & Outlook Takayama - Furukawa
Furukawa Festival (town next to Takayama,every April)
many similarities
interior: turbulent
motions
boundary:
downflow
streamlines
cusp shape
“granule” exposed
to cold environment
“naked”: not quite
(only linecloths)
19 / 20
Summary & Outlook Takayama - Furukawa
Furukawa Festival (town next to Takayama,every April)
many similarities
interior: turbulent
motions
boundary:
downflow
streamlines
cusp shape
“granule” exposed
to cold environment
“naked”: not quite
(only linecloths)
19 / 20
Summary & Outlook Takayama - Furukawa
Furukawa Festival (town next to Takayama,every April)
many similarities
interior: turbulent
motions
boundary:
downflow
streamlines
cusp shape
“granule” exposed
to cold environment
“naked”: not quite
(only linecloths)
19 / 20
Summary & Outlook Takayama - Furukawa
Furukawa Festival (town next to Takayama,every April)
many similarities
interior: turbulent
motions
boundary:
downflow
streamlines
cusp shape
“granule” exposed
to cold environment
“naked”: not quite
(only linecloths)
19 / 20
Summary & Outlook Takayama - Furukawa
Furukawa Festival (town next to Takayama,every April)
many similarities
interior: turbulent
motions
boundary:
downflow
streamlines
cusp shape
“granule” exposed
to cold environment
“naked”: not quite
(only linecloths)
19 / 20
Summary & Outlook Takayama - Furukawa
Furukawa Festival (town next to Takayama,every April)
many similarities
interior: turbulent
motions
boundary:
downflow
streamlines
cusp shape
“granule” exposed
to cold environment
“naked”: not quite
(only linecloths)
19 / 20
Summary & Outlook Takayama - Furukawa
Bilbiography
Bharti, L., Hirzberger, J., & Solanki, S. K. 2013, A&A, 552, L1
Joshi, J. 2013, PhD thesis, Technische Universitat Carolo-Wilhelmina zuBraunschweig
Leka, K. D. 1997, ApJ, 484, 900
Lites, B. W., Bida, T. A., Johannesson, A., & Scharmer, G. B. 1991, ApJ,373, 683
Lites, B. W., Scharmer, G. B., Berger, T. E., & Title, A. M. 2004, Sol.Phys., 221, 65
Louis, R. E., Bellot Rubio, L. R., Mathew, S. K., & Venkatakrishnan, P.2009, ApJL, 704, L29
Rezaei, R., Bello Gonzalez, N., & Schlichenmaier, R. 2012, A&A, 537,A19
Rimmele, T. 2008, ApJ, 672, 684
Rouppe van der Voort, L., Bellot Rubio, L. R., & Ortiz, A. 2010, ApJL,718, L78
Ruedi, I., Solanki, S. K., & Livingston, W. C. 1995, A&A, 293, 252
Shimizu, T. 2011, ApJ, 738, 83
Shimizu, T., Katsukawa, Y., Kubo, M., et al. 2009, ApJL, 696, L66
Sobotka, M., Bonet, J. A., & Vazquez, M. 1993, ApJ, 415, 832
Sobotka, M., Bonet, J. A., & Vazquez, M. 1994, ApJ, 426, 404
Sobotka, M. & Puschmann, K. G. 2009, A&A, 504, 575
van Noort, M. 2012, A&A, 548, A5
Vazquez, M. 1973, Sol. Phys., 31, 377
20 / 20