A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring...

11
A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC OPTICAL SYSTEM CONTAMINATION: EFFECTS, MEASUREMENTS, AND CONTROL 2010 SAN DIEGO CONVENTION CENTER https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100032017 2019-02-28T13:06:42+00:00Z

Transcript of A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring...

Page 1: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

A Dynamic Approach toMonitoring Particle Fallout in

a Cleanroom Environment

RADFORD L. PERRY IIISTINGER GHAFFARIAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC

OPTICAL SYSTEM CONTAMINATION: EFFECTS,MEASUREMENTS, AND CONTROL 2010

SAN DIEGO CONVENTION CENTER

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100032017 2019-02-28T13:06:42+00:00Z

Page 2: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

Introduction

q Particle fallout levels are commonly used for:• Estimating the effects of environmental exposure of sensitive

surfaces• Development of contamination budgets

q Standard fallout measurement approaches requiredurations inversely proportional to the environmentalcleanliness

q Cleanrooms are certified according to airborne particlecount, and many cleanrooms are equipped withcontinuous monitoring

q The ability to estimate particle fallout based on airborneparticle counts provides a more dynamic approach

Page 3: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

Assumptions------------------------

• Fallout rates are directly proportional to air quality• Rates and quality directly reflect activity levels• Once settled, particles remain• Accumulation surfaces are horizontal

Page 4: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

%AC vs Exposure100.0000

a 10.0000

L

e 1.0000UadL

0.1000QdVLdQI

0.0100

­v­ v1 10 Time (days) 100 1000

Simple Approach----------------------------------

0

• Previous studies correlated cleanlinessclass to cleanliness level• Cleanliness level is sensitive to particle

distributions• MIL-STD 1246 (IEST-STD-CC-1246) cleanliness

levels use -0.926 distribution slope• Airborne particle distribution follows a -0.28

slope• Distribution of particle fallout is -0.383

• Results in non-linear relationship

q Correlation to a normalized areacoverage (e.g. PAC) provides alinear time relationship

q Simple substitution remains non-linear for cleanroom class

Page 5: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

- G--.1 'AF,FA'RIAN •l,;E^;G.HIV;OL;OG .̀I;ESI Theoretical Components

• Airborne Particle Distribution (FED-STD-209)2

o.s 2.2

. 20

n = Class . 5n

X x

Class *xX

• Effective Column Height (Stokes Coefficient)v= 2 * g * r 2 *(di -d2 ) Caveat: Limit column height by ceiling height

and air exchanges

• Obscuration Factor9Pg

OF

Z

OF = x 1AR

2

x

AR

* +AR-14

Particle Size (microns) Aspect Ratio (L:V)

1- 694

X 0.1088

70 -175 X 0.8804/26.53

176 -346 X 2.589/181500

> 346 X 0.8964/9.138

Adapted from Ma, Fong, and Lee, SPIE 1165 (1989)

Page 6: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

^- _+

T Putting It All Together +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I

V.OS'_ -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q Combination of distribution, column height, and

obscuration factor provides a linear correlation ofarea coverage (AC) to cleanroom class and time(Class-Hours)

n

r nx+1 — nx 1 * r V `* 3 600 s * ft 1 * r 1.076 x10 -" fft21n

xACx CCJxI OF J hr 3 0.48 cm J [OF *

ClassPm 2

q A spreadsheet was used to determine theincremental contribution of AC for particles in 1micron bins from 1 to 1000 microns

Page 7: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

Numerical Results

1.00E-08

L AC = 1.8x10 -11 (ht) 0.7/C-H0

1.00E-09VVQd

1.00E-10

0

U.

1.00E-11

1 10 100 1000 10000

Ceiling Height (ft)

Z.os

For ISO 14644-1: therefore AC = 4.7x10 -14(ht) 0.81/C-H0

x

. 1n

Class10 *

x

x

Page 8: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

- G_-.1 'AF,FA'RIAN

TE{G N;o L,OC`^ E SI How To Make It Work

• Predictive:–Assume a limit of 0.1 PAC in a facility with a 100 foot ceiling,

this results in 2.2x10 6 Class-Hours• For a Class 10K facility: 220 hours• For one month duration: Class 3000

–Assume covering off-shift (2/3 of each day)• For a Class 10K facility: 660 hours• For one month duration: Class 9000

• Dynamic:– Cleanroom environments are rarely static, but vary with

activity level– Airborne particle counters can provide real-time data

Page 9: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

Application

SSDIF Particle Counts(Kanomax 3715 Particle Counters, 0.1 cfm)

12000

10000 — F— --- --- — — — — —y — — — —. CertifiedClass

H 8000caVCh

N 6000M

LL 4000

FunctionalClass

2000

03/1 3/8 3/15 3/22 3/29

-Max Class

q Hourly monitoring sums to 5.15x10 5 Class-Hours (>75% margin)

Page 10: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

Supporting Evidence------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - -

• Ongoing monitoring at GSFC SSDIFo Estimated AC/C-H (100 ft ceiling): 4.5x10 -10

o {Estimated AC/C-H (43 exchanges/hr): 5.9x10-9}05o Measured AC/C-H (5m channel): 4.9(±8.0)x10 -10

o {Measured AC/C-H (0.5m channel): 4.6(±9.2)x10-9}

• Hamburg data: 9.3x10-10 AC/C-H

1.00E-0

1.00E-03

rn12> 1.00E-04

zE

Cg

CU1.00E-05

♦ y = 9.32E-10x♦ ♦ R' = 4.01E-01

1.00E-06

w1.00E-07

10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000

Estimated Cleanroom Class (FED-STD-209)

Page 11: A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a ... · A Dynamic Approach to Monitoring Particle Fallout in a Cleanroom Environment RADFORD L. PERRY III STINGER GHAFFARIAN

Acknowledgements

• Kristen McKittrick — Image Analysis

• Colette LePage — Particle Counter data

• James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) IntegratedScience Instrument Module (ISIM)