A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based...
-
Upload
hortense-mccoy -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based...
![Page 1: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Ban
d
June 2008 By MWG/AWG
![Page 2: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• The “700 MHz Band” in the United States• Path Loss Comparison• High Mobility Support Based on Doppler Spread• Coverage and Capacity Simulations• Metropolitan Area Deployment Comparisons• Conclusion
![Page 3: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• Mobile WiMAX Release 1.0 Profiles– 2300 MHz to 3800 MHz– 2500MHz and 3500MHz
• Radio and TV broadcasting– 470 MHz to 862 MHz
• Comparison of WiMAX Deployments at 700 MHz and 2500 MHz – Range, coverage, capacity , and performance
![Page 4: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The “700 MHz Band” in the United States
• “Lower” 700 MHz Band in the US
![Page 5: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The “700 MHz Band” in the United States
• “Upper” 700 MHz Band in the US
![Page 6: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Possible BS Configurations for US 700 MHz Band Plan
![Page 7: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Path Loss Comparison
• Channel Models
• Building and Vehicular Penetration Loss
• Other Parameter Differences
• System Path Loss Model
![Page 8: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Parameters for Path Loss Comparison
![Page 9: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Suburban Outdoor Path Loss Comparison
![Page 10: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Building and Vehicular Penetration Loss
• Outdoor measurements were taken on both sides of the street and averaged
• Indoor measurements were acquired in the rooms in an ‘X’ manner.
• Attenuation for types of buildings, rooms and floors were measured and correlated
![Page 11: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Building Penetration Loss in the 900 MHz Band
• Buildings were grouped as follows:– High Integrated (HIn) : > 6 floors, sharing walls– High Isolated (HIs) : > 6 floors, non-sharing walls– Low Integrated (LIn) :< 6 floors, sharing walls– Low Isolated (LIs) :< 6 floors, non-sharing walls
• Rooms were classified as follows:– Indoor Light (IL) : room with windows to outdoors– Indoor (I) : room without windows, one wall separation– Deep Indoor (DI): Multiple walls
• Attenuation increased as you go deeper into the building (IL ~5dB, I~6dB, DI~9dB)
• Attenuation penetration decrease for higher floors(~0.8 dB/floor)
![Page 12: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Other Parameter Differences
• Cable Losses– In 2500MHz band: cable losses from 2dB to
6dB– In 700MHz band: cable losses from 1dB to
3dB
![Page 13: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
System Path Loss Model
![Page 14: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
High Mobility Support Based on Doppler Spread
• PICI: inter-carrier interference power relative to received signal power
• fd: Doppler frequency
• Ts: symbol period
![Page 15: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• : depend on the particular Doppler spectrum value
![Page 16: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Doppler Spreading Impact on SINR
![Page 17: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Coverage and Capacity Simulations
• Compare coverage, interference, and channel capacity performance between 700 MHz and 2500 MHz WiMAX Systems
• Simulation time is about 100 seconds, which contain 20,000 5 ms frames
![Page 18: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Average Interference Margin
![Page 21: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Coverage Comparison Based on Data CDF Curves
• 90% of MSs have a DL data subcarrier CINR greater than -4dB in a 2500 MHz system
• 90%of MSs have a DL data subcarrier CINR greater than 0 dB in the 700 MHz system
• 700 MHz system achieve greater coverage
![Page 22: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Modulation & Coding Scheme Utilization Comparison
• DL MCS (Modulation and coding scheme) usage from QPSK ½ to 64QAM 3/4
![Page 23: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
User Throughput Distribution700 MHz system has both higher user throughput
and better area coverage
![Page 24: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Metropolitan Area Deployment Comparisons
![Page 25: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Metropolitan Area Deployment Comparisons
![Page 26: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Other Mobile WiMAX™ Usage Models
![Page 30: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Conclusion
• Compared to WiMAX solution in the 2500 MHz frequency band, 700 MHz deployment provide a considerable rage benefit
![Page 31: A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e365503460f94b25ea4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Comment
• Spectrum is limited, and low frequency spectrum is valuable
• How to reuse the spectrum is an important issues