A Common Mechanism of Cellular Death Induced by ... · Death Induced by Bactericidal Antibiotics...

25
A Common Mechanism of Cellular Death Induced by Bactericidal Antibiotics Michael A. Kohanski, Daniel J. Dwyer, Boris Hayete, Carolyn A. Lawrence, and James J. Collins Boston University, Boston, MA Cell. 2007 Sept 7;130( 5): 797-810

Transcript of A Common Mechanism of Cellular Death Induced by ... · Death Induced by Bactericidal Antibiotics...

A Common Mechanism of CellularDeath Induced by Bactericidal

Antibiotics

Michael A. Kohanski, Daniel J. Dwyer, Boris Hayete,Carolyn A. Lawrence, and James J. Collins

Boston University, Boston, MA

Cell. 2007 Sept 7;130( 5): 797-810

Two Anti-Microbial Therapies

• Bactericidal– Kill >99.9% bacteria– Specific Drug-Target interactions

• Bacteriostatic– Inhibit growth of bacteria

• Sometimes not a clear line between twoclasses. High concentrations ofbacteriostatic can result in killing.

Classes of Drug-Targetinteractions (Bactericidal)

• Inhibit DNA replication/repair– Quinolines (NORFLOXACIN)

• Inhibit Protein synthesis– Aminoglycosides (KANAMYCIN)

• Inhibit Cell-wall turnover– β-lactams (AMPICILLIN)

Question: What is the bacteria’s response tothis primary drug-target interaction?

Bacteriostatic

• Target 30S ribosome function– Ex: TETRACYCLINE, SPECTINOMYCIN

• Target 50S ribosome function– Ex: CHLORAMPHENICOL, ERYTHROMYCIN

• Target RNA polymerase– Ex: RIFAMYCIN

Fenton ReactionH2O2 + Fe2+ Fe3+ + OH* + OH-

Previously, Dwyer et al. showed that gyrase inhibitors(quinoline synthetic antibiotics) induce breakdown in Fe

regulation, which leads to OH* formation

Question: What is the source of Fe?Ex: Intracellular- Fe-S clusters

Extracellular- Iron Import

Question:Does OH* formation contributeto antibiotic-induced cell death

and are there differencesamong classes of antibiotics?

OH*

Flow Cytometryand HPF

OH*

Argon

Thiourea: OH* scavenger (sequesters OH*)Dipyridyl: Iron Chelator (sequesters unbound Fe)

Cell Death by H2O2 HPF Fluorescence

Hours (post-treatment) Log Fluor Intensity

Conclusion: HPF good at measuring hydroxyl radical formation

FIGURE 1: E. coli

Cell Death by Bactericidals HPF Fluorescence

Note:Bimodal curveAmp treated

FIGURE 1: E. coli

Conclusion: Bactericidal antibiotics promote formation of OH*

Amp addition

Similar results withGram+ Staphylococcus

aureus

Seems killing of cellscorrelates to OH*

production

What about lethal dosesof bacteriostatic drugs?

Is OH* formation important in bactericidal killing?

Figure 2

My question:

H2O2 + thiourea = NO OH* as seen by HPF

Norfloxacin + thiourea = some OH* production...

Why the difference?

Fenton ReactionH2O2 + Fe2+ Fe3+ + OH* + OH-

Where is this iron coming from?

Iron transport/import? TonB mutant

Structure of TonB in Complex with FhuA, E. coli OuterMembrane Receptor

P.D. Pawelek1, N. Croteau1, C. Ng-Thow-Hing1, C.M.Khursigara1, N. Moiseeva2, M. Allaire2 and J.W. Coulton1

1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGillUniversity, 2National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven

National Laboratory

tonB no protective effect from bactericidals

Conclusion: Fe in Fenton reaction not from extracellular source

Fenton ReactionH2O2 + Fe2+ Fe3+ + OH* + OH-

Where is this iron coming from?

Fe-S clusters?IscS mutant

Lauhon, C. T. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:19551-19558

Conclusion: Fe in Fenton reaction from intracellular source (Fe-S)

Fig 2(again)

Table 1: aka the largest table EVERMicroarray data of genes regulated by bactericidal

drug classes relative to spectinomycin

• Upregulated (38)– NADH Dehydrogenase ONLY pathway

upregulated by all three!• Downregulated (142)

– β-lactam resistance membrane protein– Multidrug efflux system transporter– Transport, drug/analog sensitivity

• Why spectinomycin?

Fe leaching via superoxidesAnd how do we get superoxides?

Oxidative Phosphorylation

Complex I Complex III Complex IV ATPase

nuo

H+

H+ H+

H+H+

H+

H+

H+

ADP + Pi

ATPH2O1/2 O2

NADH NAD+

e-

cyt C

cyt bc1

cyt aa3cbb3Q Cyt

bc1e-

NUO

NADH NAD+O2

O2•

Figure 3A: Nad+ Cycling AssayCollect culture, centrifuge, flash freeze pellet

Add NaOH-NADH extraction, HCl-NAD+ extraction (stability)Boil 10 min, centrifuge, collect supernatant = sample

96 well plate: sample, bicine, neutralizing buffer, phenazine ethosulfate (e-carrier), MTT (redox indicator), EtOH (dissolves MTT), EDTA

Add yeast alcohol dehydrogenase to start reaction-kinetics 570nm

Rate of MTT reduction is proportional to conc of

NAD+ or NADHNAD+, NADH standards for

calibration

Decreased NADH poolleads to decreased O2

leads to less Fe leachingleads to less OH* leads to

less death

Figure 3:

SOS RESPONSE GENES

SOS RESPONSE GENES

Repressor

DNA DamageActivates RecAPromotes LexAauto cleavage

SOS

GFP

pZ vectorAM

P

Ori

Measure Fluorescence

Figure 4

Note:

Norfloxacin induces SOS

Bimodal Amp curve-Corresponds with lysis

No Kan difference

-Requires transcriptionAND translation of GFP

-Kan disrupts translation

Figure 5: RecA mutant

Figure 6:Big Picture

Bactericidal DrugTarget not important

Upregulation of NADHDehydrogenase

Destabilize Fe fromFe-S clusters

Rapid depletion of NADH O2*

FENTON REACTION!

Hydroxyl Radicals!DEATH!

Final Comments?