A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster...

109
A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University

Transcript of A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster...

Page 1: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

A Cognitive Perpective on How People

Learn: Implications for Teaching

Geoff Norman, Ph.D.

McMaster University

Page 2: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

The Cognitive Perspective

“The essence of intelligence is less a matter of reasoning and more a matter of knowing a lot about the world”

H.A.Simon, 1989

expertise

Page 3: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Teaching MUTES Memory and Understanding Transfer Exercises Skills

Page 4: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Some assertions about learning Learning and remembering results from

assimilation of new knowledge into existing knowledge, and meaning is critical to learning

Transfer (applying old knowledge to new situations) doesn’t happen easily

Structured, planned, practice with multiple examples is key to transfer

General skills don’t exist – it’s all imbedded in knowledge

Page 5: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Learning and Understanding Learning is strongly influenced by the

meaning . If we can understand what we are learning

in terms of pre-existing knowledge, better learning and retention results

Meaning is a consequence of the interaction between learner and ‘to be learned’

Page 6: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time. And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot: Full of sound and furySignifying nothing

W. Shakespeare, Macbeth, V, v

Page 7: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Sound is walking, stage struts and a tale is heard. No more a poor candle, frets life. A brief idiot, fury and shadow, is in a dusty fool.

Page 8: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

drswa gtrus hdrkl opono rluta

sflta dnaro lensa bfdoa radit

sogfv sonap vfhoe qpofs cpoas

Page 9: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Meaning is imposed by the learner and involves an interaction between existing knowledge and new information

Page 10: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

The procedure is quite simple. First you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities, this is the next step. It is better to do too few things at once than too many. At first it seems complicated, but soon it just becomes a fact of life. After it’s over, you arrange the materials in groups again, then put them in the right place.

Page 11: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Washing Clothes The procedure is quite simple. First you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient. If you have to go somewhere else due to lack of facilities, this is the next step. It is better to do too few things at once than too many. At first it seems complicated, but soon it just becomes a fact of life. After it’s over, you arrange the materials in groups again, then put them in the right place.

Page 12: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Evidence of the Role of Meaning Chess

Nephrology

Page 13: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

How do you get to be a chess master?

Is it:- learning the rules?

- learning to think of more moves and deeper strategy? (process)

- learning to think better moves? (knowledge)

Page 14: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recall of Chess Positions 4 levels of chess player

mid-game positions

5-7 sec exposure

Page 15: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.
Page 16: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recall after 5 sec. Exposure(real positions)

0

5

10

15

20

25

/24

<1600 16-2000 20-2350 >2350

Skill level

Page 17: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recall after 5 sec. exposure

0

5

10

15

20

25

/24

<1600 16-200020-2350 >2350

Skill level

RandomReal

Page 18: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

It’s not just Visual Patterns Lab data, nephrology problems

5 research associates 6 students 5 experts

Page 19: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recall of Nephrology Data

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

/20

NOVICE EXPERT

Expertise

RandomReal

Page 20: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Basic science and meaningWhy do students need basic science?

Some docs use it a lot? Nephrologists, anesthesiologists, intensivists

Many docs use it a little? With difficult problems

It may provide meaning and coherence for students…….

Page 21: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Basic Science and Meaning(Woods, Brooks, Norman, 2003)

4 neurology / muscular diseases

36 medical students Basic Science or Symptom/Disease

probability

Page 22: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Measurement Diagnostic Test

15 cases, 4-6 features

Administered at 0, 7 days

Page 23: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Score on Dx Test

30

35

40

45

50

55

Immediate 1 Week

Feature ListBasic Sci

Page 24: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Score on Dx Test

30

35

40

45

50

55

Immediate 1 Week

Feature ListBasic Sci

Page 25: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Score on Dx Test

30

35

40

45

50

55

Immediate 1 Week

Feature ListBasic Sci

Page 26: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Basic science is used to construct and reconstruct coherent relations between symptom and disease

Page 27: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Summary Remembering for meaningful material is

enhanced because there are more links or pathways to the memory trace

Page 28: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Implications for Teachers

How can we, as teachers, help students impose meaning on what they’re learning?

Page 29: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Implications for Curriculum What are we doing now?

“Traditional” PBL

Does PBL enhance learning” MACRO -- no or maybe

MICRO: Active Learning Imbedding problem Everyday analogy

Page 30: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Effect of active, problem-oriented processing(Needham & Begg, 1991)

Intro psychology students, 5 classic problems

“Try to solve these difficult problems” ( 27% successful)

vs.

“Remember the problem and solution so you can solve some additional problems”

(21% successful)

Page 31: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Effect of Active Problem-solving

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Problem-oriented Memory oriented

Needham & Begg, 1991

Page 32: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Imbedding Principle in Problem

(Ross & Kilbane, 1997)Practice and Test problems with: SEQUENTIAL

Principle explanation, then problem example

IMBEDDED Principle imbedded in problem, explanation as part of problem

“Reversal” = using original principle incorrectly

Page 33: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Reversal Errors

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Sequential Imbedded

Page 34: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Analogy in Learning Science(Donnelly & McDaniel, 1993)

48 students, 12 concepts

Literal description of concept vs. description + analogy in familiar domain (e.g. pulsar star and lighthouse)

24 MCQs; 4/concept, 12 basic +12 inference

Page 35: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

86

No analogy Analogy

RecallInference

Page 36: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

An application in Medical Education

Laplace Law:

Anybody remember LaPlace Law?

Anybody understand it?

Page 37: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Pressure and Tension on a Membrane

P

T

r

T = P * rLaw of Laplace

Page 38: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

The “weight and string” problem

W

Ta

T = W / 2 sin(a)

Page 39: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

T T

W W

T = W / 2 sin(alpha)

a

Page 40: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

T

T

t

t

Page 41: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Dual Explanations (Krebs, Dore, Norman, 2006) Three “Laws”

Laplace , Right Heart Strain, Starling

Intervention Mechanical + Biological Active Comparison vs. Biological explanation only

Test 9 diagnostic cases Sample -- undergrad psych students

Page 42: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Percent Correct

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Dual Biological

Explanation

Page 43: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Implications for Teaching/ Curriculum Arrange learning to integrate with prior

knowledge Active learning Problem – based learning Imbed principle in problem Everyday analogy

Sequencing of concepts

Page 44: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Transfer

using old knowledge to solve new problems

Page 45: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

As teachers, we act as if all the knowledge we impart to students will be available to them to solve problems in the future

Page 46: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

As teachers, we act as if all the knowledge we impart to students will be available to them to solve problems in the future

Unfortunately….. it won’t

Page 47: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Views of Transfer

General Transfer (1900-1915….)

Subjects like Latin, algebra teach general “habits of mind”

(disproved by Thorndike, 1913)

Specific transfer (Behaviorism,1910--> Now)

Learned concepts can only be transferred if new behavior = old behavior

(disproved by Judd, 1908, Wertheimer, 1959, Pressley 1990)

Intermediate / hybrid transfer

Learned concepts can be applied (with difficulty) to new, dissimilar problem situations

Page 48: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

A general wishes to capture a fortress located in the centre of a country. There are many roads radiating from the fortress. All have been mined so that, while small groups of men can pass over the roads safely, a large force will detonate the mines. A full-scale direct attack is therefore impossible. The general’s solution is to divide the army into small groups, send each down a different road, and have the groups converge simultaneously on the fortress.

Page 49: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

You are a doctor faced with a patient who has a malignant tumour in his stomach. It is impossible to operate on the tumour. X-rays can be used to destroy the tumour. If sufficient rays reach the tumour all at once, the cancer cells will be killed, but surrounding tissue will be damaged as well. How can you arrange the procedure to destroy the tumour cells without severely damaging the surrounding tissue. Gick & Holyoak, 1980

Page 50: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Transfer and Context Specificity

The initial solution (multiple simultaneous paths) was learned in, and stored with the problem context (fortress and army).

To solve the new problem, must recognize that the old problem was analogous to the new, despite different contexts

To recognize analogy, we must recognize similarity in deep structure

this rarely happens…..

Page 51: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Why not just teach them the principle? Teach the principle, then give them an

example of the principle

Page 52: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

“…during early learning, the principle is only understood in terms of the earlier example… the principle and example are bound together. Even if learners are given the principle or formula, they would use the details of the earlier problem in figuring out how to apply that principle to the current problem”

Brian Ross

Page 53: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Effective Use of Practice Examples

Multiple examples vs. “Principle + Example”

Active Compare and Contrast vs. Separate (Gentner, 2003, Holyoak,1989)

Page 54: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Multiple Examples vs. Principle + Example MBA Students , negotiation problem

Factor 1 Two cases, implicit principle vs.Principle +

Case

Factor 2 Read case and principle (on successive

pages) vs. Compare Case and Principle

Loewenstein& Gentner, 2003

Page 55: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Effect of Examples and Comparisons

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Compare No Compare

Two CasesCase + Principle

Gentner, 2003

Page 56: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Implications for Teaching

Transfer can be facilitated by use of examples during initial learning

multiple examples > principle + example compare and contrast Active search for deep structure

Page 57: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Transfer, examples and practice Critical to learning, transfer is the opportunity

to see the concept arise in multiple contexts This can only arise with multiple practical

exercises

What can we do to enhance the value of practice?

Page 58: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Strategies to Optimize Practice

Mixed vs. Blocked Practice (Hatala, 2002)

Distributed vs. Blocked Practice(Schmidt &Bjork,1992)

Page 59: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

What do you need to do stats?

An Observation:

With the availability of sophisticated statistical software, the central issue facing the statistics student is “ What test do I use?”

To learn this, students have to see data sets, think of possible strategies, and get feedback

Page 60: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

What do you get in stats courses? Instructional time occupied by equation

proving, formula remembering

Practice at end of chapter of the form: “Do a t test on these data”

Page 61: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

So when do you do a t test?

At the end of the t test chapter

Page 62: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

The solution

Mixed practice

Page 63: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Mixed vs. Blocked Practice

In the face of ambiguous features (which are subject to reinterpretation), and multiple categories, students must learn the features which discriminate one category from another, not those which support a particular category

Page 64: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Mixed vs. Blocked PracticeHatala, 2000

ECG Diagnosis -- 3 categories 6 examples / category

Blocked

Review, then 6 examples/category

Mixed

Review, 2/category, 12 (4 x 3) practice

TEST 6 new ECGs

Page 65: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Accuracy -- %

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

4550

Mixed Blocked

Page 66: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Timing and Sequence of Learning

Would you rather learn to skate (type, play violin, speak Spanish):

1 hour/day, biweekly, for 60 weeks = 30 1 hour / day for 3 days/wk for 10 wks = 30 3 hours/day, 1 day/week, 10 weeks = 30 6 hours/day, 5 days, 1 week = 30

Page 67: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Massed vs. Distributed Practice

Massed All learning takes place at one time

Distributed Learning takes place over multiple

occasions

Page 68: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Massed vs. Distributed

(Raman, McLaughlin, 2010)

20 GI residents

Nutrition course

- 4 hr, one 1/2 day vs. 1 hr. 4 1/2 day

Multiple choice test, 0, + 1 wk., + 3 mo.

Page 69: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

05

10

1520

2530

35

No of items recalled

Change 0-1 wk Change 0 - 3 mo

Condition

Massed vs. Distributed

DistributedMassed

Page 70: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Implications for Teaching Practice is critical for learning and transfer

to impose meaning on concepts to overcome “context specificity” to enhance transfer

Some practice works better than others Mixed >> blocked Distributed >> Blocked

Page 71: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Exercises, Experience and Expertise

The critical role of deliberate practice in acquisition of expertise

Is practice just a matter of learning to apply the rules? remember the chess master!!!!

Page 72: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.
Page 73: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

How long does it take to learn chess?

To learn the rules ---- 10 hr.?

To become an expert ---10,000 hr. / 10 yr.

Experts know about 50,000 strategies (Ericsson, 2004)

Page 74: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Age and Skilled Chess Performance

Ericsson and Charness, 1998

Page 75: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

How long does it take to learn to play:- Violin- Piano- Field Hockey

Page 76: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

*

*

Page 77: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.
Page 78: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

How long does it take to learn to play doctor?

Page 79: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Age and Diagnostic Accuracy

Hobus & Schmidt, 1993

Page 80: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

How many years after you finished specialty training before you felt yoou were competent?

Page 81: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Who do you choose? Dr. JS. finished residency last year and was

in top 5 on cardiology RCPS exam?

Dr. KT finished residency 10 years ago and was in top 1/3 on cardiology RCPS exam?

Page 82: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

What does the clinician gain from years of experience?

Years of experiences

Page 83: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Is Expertise Just a Matter of Applying the Right Rules?

Experienced clinicians are poorer than recent graduates on formal tests (of the rules) But no one picks a recent graduate for their doc

Experience provides a storehouse of prior examples

Page 84: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

A DIAGNOSTIC TASKWhat are all these

things?

A DIAGNOSTIC TASKWhat are all these

things?

Page 85: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

chairs,

(of course)

Page 86: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

What makes something a chair?

What are the rules of chairs

(as distinct from sofas, stools, tables)

Page 87: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

The rule describes this….

Page 88: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Does it cover these…?

Page 89: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.
Page 90: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.
Page 91: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

We can recognize chairs quickly, accurately, and effortlessly

But we can’t easily verbalize the rule

When we try, it’s incomplete

HOW COME?

Page 92: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Similarity and recognition of everyday objects When we recognize everyday objects,

the process is effortless, seemingly unconscious.

We are not aware that we are eliciting or weighting individual features

The process appears to occur all at once (Gestalt)

Page 93: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Familiar Categories Rapid, effortless, accurate recognition

- despite massive within – category variation- despite no overt understanding of rules

Unfamiliar Categories Slow, effortful, inaccurate recognition

Despite NO within – category variation Despite an explicit and simple additive rule

Page 94: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Exemplar Theory - Medin, Brooks Categories consist of a collection of prior

instances identification of category membership based on

availability of similar instances Similarity is “non-analytic” (not conscious), hence

can result from objectively irrelevant features Ratings of typicality, identification of features, etc.

done “on the fly” at retrieval

Page 95: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Effect of Similarity (Allen, Brooks, Norman, 1992)

24 medical students, 6 conditions

Learn Rules Practice rules

Train Set A Train Set B(6 x 4) x 5 (6 x 4) x 5

Test (9 / 30)

Page 96: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.
Page 97: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.
Page 98: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Accuracy by Bias Condition

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Bias Corr Bias Incorr

CorrectIncorrectOther

Page 99: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Hatala et al, ECG Interpretation Medical students/ Fam Med residents PRACTICE (4/4 + 7 filler)

middle aged banker with chest pain

OR elderly woman with chest pain

Anterior M I

TEST ( 4 critical + 3 filler) Middle aged banker

Left Bundle Branch Block

Page 100: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

RESULTSPercent of Diagnoses by Condition

05

101520253035404550

Correct Prior

Diagnosis

Per

cent

men

tion

ing

BiasNo bias

Page 101: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Implications for Teaching Practice with examples is critical in

ambiguous domains

Practice results in a collection of exemplars as a problem-solving resource

Page 102: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

What happened to Skills? Any measure of “problem-solving”,

“reasoning”, “critical thinking”, “clinical judgment”, etc. correlates across problems at about 0.1-- 0.3.

Process measures of the above show no gradient with expertise

Page 103: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recurring ThemesLearning

Human learning and remembering is critically sensitive to the meaning the learner imposes on the “to be learned”

Page 104: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recurring Themes Transfer of concepts to new, dissimilar

problem situations does not occur effortlessly or frequently

Enhanced by active learning, search for principles, multiple practice examples

Impeded by learning for memory, passive learning, single example

Page 105: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recurring Themes

Formal conceptual knowledge is insufficient for expertise

Experience provides an array of prior examples to draw from and reduce memory load

Page 106: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Recurring ThemesKinds of Knowledge

Expertise is more a matter of having the right knowledge (both formal and experiential) and being able to mobilize it, than of any general skills

Page 107: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Thinking depends on specific, context-bound skills and units of knowledge that have little application to other domains….. The case for generalizable, context-independent skills that can be trained in one context and transferred to other domains has proven to be more a case of wishful thinking than hard, empirical evidence.

Perkins & Salomon, 1989

Page 108: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

Conclusion

“The problem-solving difficulties of novices can be attributed largely to the inadequacies of their knowledge base and not to limitations in their problem-solving capabilities”

R. Glaser, 1984

We have discussed a number of strategies to improve the knowledge base

Page 109: A Cognitive Perpective on How People Learn: Implications for Teaching Geoff Norman, Ph.D. McMaster University.

The End

Thanks