A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

27
A CASE OF INSIDER TRADING (HLL – BBLIL MERGER) POOJA GHODDHYAN - 09FT124 RHEA GHOSH - 09FT126 SHIRISH GANESAN - 09FT145 SUSHANT AGARWAL - 09FT158 VARUN SETHI - 09FT170

Transcript of A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Page 1: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

A CASE OF INSIDER TRADING

(HLL – BBLIL MERGER)

POOJA GHODDHYAN - 09FT124RHEA GHOSH - 09FT126

SHIRISH GANESAN - 09FT145SUSHANT AGARWAL - 09FT158

VARUN SETHI - 09FT170

Page 2: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Introduction

HUL formerly known as HLL is India’s largest consumer products company with an annual turn over of Rs. 13,000 Crores (2007)

Brooke Bond is a brand-name of tea owned Co by Unilever, formerly an independent manufacturer in the United Kingdom, known for its PG Tips brand and its Brooke Bond tea cards.

Page 3: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

HINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED (1956)

Merger of

Hindustan Vanaspati Manufacturing Company(1931)

Lever Brothers India Limited (1933)

United Traders Limited (1935)

Page 4: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

HLL

Brands like Lifebuoy, Lux, Surf Excel, Rin, Fair and Lovely, Pond’s , Sunsilk the list is endless…

Boost for HLL in India: Liberalization of Indian economy in 1991 Removal of Regulatory framework

Page 5: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd.

Presence of Brook Bond in India dates back to 1903.Unilever acquired Brooke Bond through an international

acquisition in 1984. Unilever acquired Lipton in 1972.Brook Bond and Lipton Tea Ltd were merged in 1993 to form

BBLIL.

Page 6: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

HLL - BBLIL Merger (The Case)

Case analyzes the charges of insider trading by SEBI against the merger of HLL and BBLIL

Controversy - Illegal purchase of BBLIL’s 8 Lakh shares by HLL, prior to public announcement of their merger.

SEBI: suspected insider trading and conducted enquiries.

SEBI issued a show cause notice to HLL.

Page 7: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

INSIDER TRADING ?

Insider trading is buying and selling of securities by the insider of a company who has price sensitive information about the company.

It can be both legal as well as illegal.Having special knowledge is unfair to other investors who are

oblivious to any such information.

Page 8: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

INSIDER TRADING…

Insider trading is for listed companies only.

Merchant bankers and intermediaries come under the purview .

Punitive in nature – It is defined what constitutes insider trading and then the offender is punished accordingly.

Page 9: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)

M&A – Aspect of corporate strategy dealing with buying, selling and combining of different companies for synergy.

Merger is what concerns us - this may fraught a stock swap or cash payment.

Stock swap - The ratio in which an acquiring company offers its own shares in exchange for the target company's share.

Page 10: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

WHY MERGER ?

Eliminate competition.To manage growth. To reduce operating costs.Expansion plans- venturing out into a different field.To be able to control pricing.

Page 11: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Entities Involved

HLL

BBLIL

UTI

SEBI

Page 12: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

THE MERGER

Merger was certain as HLL had started consolidating.

The big question was WHEN would the merger take place.

There was no formal announcement from the company’s side, however speculation about the same had been doing rounds in the market.

Page 13: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Sequence of events

HLL purchased 0.8 million shares of BBLIL from UTI at Rs. 350.35 per share. Transaction took place on March 25, 1996.

On 19 April 1996, HLL notified the stock exchange of its proposal to merge with BBLIL.

 A day after the announcement of the merger, BBLIL scrip quoted @ Rs. 405 leading to a gain of 4.35 Crores for HLL.

Page 14: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Preparing for the war

SEBI’s crack down with India’s first ever ‘guilty’ verdict for an insider trading offence.

HLL marshaled its formidable corporate resources to battle it out against SEBI’s charges.

Page 15: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

The Allegation

August 4, 1997, SEBI issued a show cause notice to HLL claiming that there was prima facie evidence of the company indulging in insider trading.

Alleged HLL of using price sensitive information prior to its merger with BBLIL.

Page 16: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

SEBI’s Verdict

The timing of the deal and HLL’s buying of shares further suggests that the HLL management was almost certain and all geared up for the merger.

March 1998, SEBI found HLL guilty of insider trading as it had bought shares of BBLIL from UTI even when it was completely aware that a merger was impending.

Page 17: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Case Analysis

SEBI ‘s view: A Thin line exists between an honest action and a fraud.

Pragmatic evaluation of insider trading - An onerous task.

HLL and BBLIL were under a common management - This bolsters the speculation of complicity

Page 18: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

HLL’S Contention

“No company can be an insider to itself ”Transactional knowledge existed as it was a primary party to the

merger and not because BBLIL was an associate company.It further endorsed its argument by stating that allegations would

not have been made if HLL had purchased shares of TOMCO - as the two were not associated.

Page 19: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

HLL’s Arguments

Only information about swap ratio is price-sensitive and this wasn’t known to HLL or its directors when the BBLIL shares were purchased.

The news of the merger was not price-sensitive as it had been announced by the media before company’s announcement.

Page 20: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Merger - “Generally unknown”

An absurd argument put forth by HLL was information about the merger was known in the market.

It was giving speculation as a justification for its clandestine behavior.

In fact BBLIL’s management also concealed information of the merger. It could have informed UTI about the merger when the latter held 8 Lakh shares.

Page 21: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Cont…

HLL agreed that shares had been bought with the sole intention of increasing stakes in BBLIL.

UNILEVER wanted to own a 51% stake in HUL.

However, section 3 of SEBI [prohibition of] insider trading regulations clearly defines insider trading irrespective of the fact whether profits have been made or not.

Page 22: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

SEBI’s charge and HLL’s justification

Instead of buying shares from the secondary market, the method of preferential allotment could have been adopted by HLL.

Such a step would have involved various compliances/clearances, and required Unilever to bring in substantial funds in foreign exchange.

The implication: HLL depleted its reserves to ensure that Unilever did not have to bring in additional funds.

Page 23: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Cont…

HLL argued that issuing of preferential share would have been a cheaper option to ensure that it had a 51 per cent stake in HLL.

While the preferential route would have been beneficial for itself, it would have been detrimental for other shareholders- would lead to a lower EPS.

Page 24: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Cont…

SEBI accused HLL of dealing with BBLIL shares on the basis of unpublished price-sensitive information which is prohibited under Section 3 of the Regulations.

Section 2 (k) states that unpublished, price-sensitive information relates to amalgamations, mergers, and takeovers or is of concern to a company and is not generally known or published.

SEBI held that there can be no dispute that the information of the overall fact of the merger fell under this definition. 

Page 25: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

Conclusion

Generally it is difficult to determine whether there exists a case of insider trading.

All points in this case indicate a clear case of insider trading.Merger – definitely price sensitive information.HLL depleted its reserves for one specific shareholder at the

expense of other share holders- violation of corporate governance.

Page 26: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil

On a lighter note…

SEBI’s verdict is a black spot on a company that excels in cleaning them up.

“SURF EXCEL HAI NA”

Page 27: A Case of Insider Trading Hll and Bblil