A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based...

30
A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier Royce Greaves

Transcript of A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based...

Page 1: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

A case for breaking down

the Capital – Maintenance

Barrier Royce Greaves

mlohrey
Typewritten Text
mlohrey
Typewritten Text
mlohrey
Typewritten Text
mlohrey
Typewritten Text
Page 2: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Icebreaker

I’m a Civil Engineering Asset Manager

So what does that mean?

I can help you deliver more for less:

impress your legislature!

please your stakeholders!

give you some certainty about your future costs!

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 2

Page 3: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Icebreaker

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 3

Page 4: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Icebreaker

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 4

Page 5: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Icebreaker

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 5

Page 6: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Presentation Overview

• Purpose

• Current situation

• Constraints to change

• Exploiting the constraints

• Benefits

• Summary

• Questions

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 6

Page 7: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Purpose

• When you are back at the office after this

conference…..

You will challenge your organization

You will always consider lowest lifecycle costs

when making investment decisions

You will talk to your CAPEX / OPEX teams!

You will get your OPEX / CAPEX teams

talking!

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 7

Page 8: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Current Situation

• Significant length of highway portfolio in Condition D (fair to poor)

• Fiscally constrained environment (need > budget)

• MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes

• Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

• Impact of Capital on Maintenance not always accounted for

6/4/2015

9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 8

Page 9: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Current Situation

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 9

Page 10: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

What needs to change?

• Organizational structure

• Compartmentalizing of maintenance and

capital investment

• Fixed annual, non-transferable budgets

• CAPEX decisions without downstream

OPEX impacts

• Political leverage of CAPEX over OPEX

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 10

Page 11: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

What needs to change?

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 11

Page 12: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Asset Lifecycle

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 12

Page 13: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Asset Lifecycle Cost

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 13

Cumulative costs over

asset life

Co

sts

Required cash

flow

Effective Life

Construction Maintain Refurbish

Disposal &

Replacement

0%100%

Pre

sent

val

ue

cost

s

Page 14: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Bring the two together….

• CAPEX drives OPEX

• Good OPEX CAPEX

• Efficient OPEX = more $ for CAPEX

• CAPEX = OPEX

• Additionally, these are continually changing:

LoS, standards, regulations, technologies,

budgets and political drivers

• Finding the lowest lifecycle costs can be like

looking for a needle in a haystack!

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 14

Page 15: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

What are our options?

• Work within the budget structure and do

the best job possible

OR

• Challenge our funding, budgeting and

organizational structures and develop a

true lowest lifecycle cost approach

• So what is stopping us?

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 15

Page 16: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Constraints to Change

• Organizational structure does not foster

consideration of Capital and Maintenance

works as decisions along a continuum of

an assets life

LH not talking to RH

Division of budgets

Different rules

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 16

Page 17: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Constraints to Change

• The structural inertia in large, mature,

traditional organizations makes it

challenging to effect positive change

• Desire to avoid loss is far greater than the

desire to gain

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 17

Page 18: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Constraints to Change

• Capital and maintenance investments are

evaluated using different criteria, creating

a disconnect between different parts of the

assets lifecycle

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 18

Page 19: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Constraints to Change

• The tendency to fund capital projects

creates a future maintenance liability

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 19

Page 20: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Constraints to Change

• Federal and State Funding rules do not

allow the transfer of funds between

CAPEX and OPEX funding programs

despite being able to deliver lowest

lifecycle costs if this were allowed

• To say this in another way:

Budgets are rhythmic, need is not

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 20

Page 21: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Constraints to Change

• Fear of long term budget attrition

“We spend it all because we have it!”

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 21

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

An

nu

al S

pe

nd

Financial Year

Non-optimal annual budget cycle

Page 22: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Exploiting the Constraints

• Focus on the lifecycle philosophy

Recognize each asset has OPEX costs

throughout its life, provide funding accordingly

Allow between CAPEX and OPEX

investments so that investment is driven by

lifecycle cost and delivery of LoS

Provide incentives for Capital and Mtce teams

to recognize lower LCC strategies (currently

penalized)

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 22

Page 23: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Exploiting the Constraints

• Recall the constraints:

Structure (silos)

Inertia (hard to effect positive change)

Disparate criteria

Limited lifecycle commitment

Rigid funding mechanisms

Fear of budget loss

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 23

Page 24: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Exploiting the Constraints

• Solutions to organizational constraints:

Structure

• Get Capital and Maintenance teams to collaborate

when considering Capital Investment

Inertia

• Identify barriers

• Introduce incentives for organizational innovation

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 24

Page 25: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Exploiting the Constraints

• Solutions to lifecycle investment

constraints:

Evaluate capital investment against agreed

levels of service

Introduce processes that require lifecycle

funding committed to capital investments

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 25

Page 26: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Exploiting the Constraints

• Solutions to funding constraints:

Allow discretionary movement between

CAPEX and OPEX to achieve agreed LoS

Incentivize staff to identify cost savings

Demonstrate commitment to a needs based

budget

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 26

Page 27: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Benefits of Exploiting the

Constraints

• Reduce the overall lifecycle costs of

America’s pavement assets

• Budget allocation based on need, not on

historical expenditure

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 27

Page 28: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Summary and Key Points

• Capital and Maintenance investments are required throughout the life of an asset

• Capital and Maintenance Investments influence one another

• Lowest life cycle cost can only be achieved when these investments are evaluated in the same decision framework

• Our current approach does not support this philosophy

• Break down the wall!

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 28

Page 29: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Acknowledgements

• Dr Anna Robak

• Shawn Landers

• Simon Bush

• Ewan Hunter

• Tony Porter

• ICMPA Committee

• You!

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 29

Page 30: A case for breaking down the Capital Maintenance Barrier · MAP21 - driving performance based outcomes • Capital and Maintenance seen as mutually exclusive investment alternatives

Thank you

• Questions?

6/4/2015 9th International Conference on Managing

Pavement Assets | May 18-21, 2015 30