A brief message from our sponsor...
13
A brief message from our sponsor...
description
A brief message from our sponsor. A brief message from our sponsor. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of A brief message from our sponsor...
A brief message from our sponsor...
A brief message from our sponsor...
You must provide a bibliography with your oral presentation, either in a slide as part of
PPT that you submit or printed out.
You should also ensure that you refer to sources during your speech by saying things
like "according to..." and as "the famous Historian, Tom Greenwell, shows us..." and as
we can see from examining X source...."
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not?
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not?
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not?
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not?
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
As Wikipedia articles are constantly changing you may refer to a point/ fact/ argument that is subsequently altered.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not?
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
As Wikipedia articles are constantly changing you may refer to a point/ fact/ argument that is subsequently altered.
Referencing and bibliographies are partly about demonstrating your acquaintance with expert scholarship but Wikipedia is not expert scholarship - it's what 'everybody knows'.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not? Tom's eccentric views which you should ignore in practice but might serve as food for thought....
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
As Wikipedia articles are constantly changing you may refer to a point/ fact/ argument that is subsequently altered.
Referencing and bibliographies are partly about demonstrating your acquaintance with expert scholarship but Wikipedia is not expert scholarship - it's what 'everybody knows'.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not? Tom's eccentric views which you should ignore in practice but might serve as food for thought....
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
A study in the prestigious journal Nature found that Wikipedia articles are as about as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica .
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
As Wikipedia articles are constantly changing you may refer to a point/ fact/ argument that is subsequently altered.
Referencing and bibliographies are partly about demonstrating your acquaintance with expert scholarship but Wikipedia is not expert scholarship - it's what 'everybody knows'.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not? Tom's eccentric views which you should ignore in practice but might serve as food for thought....
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
A study in the prestigious journal Nature found that Wikipedia articles are as about as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica .
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
If it is accepted that Wikipedia itself is reliable, the lack of an individual authority is unimportant - W. Is the authority.
As Wikipedia articles are constantly changing you may refer to a point/ fact/ argument that is subsequently altered.
Referencing and bibliographies are partly about demonstrating your acquaintance with expert scholarship but Wikipedia is not expert scholarship - it's what 'everybody knows'.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not? Tom's eccentric views which you should ignore in practice but might serve as food for thought....
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
A study in the prestigious journal Nature found that Wikipedia articles are as about as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica .
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
If it is accepted that Wikipedia itself is reliable, the lack of an individual authority is unimportant - W. Is the authority.
As Wikipedia articles are constantly changing you may refer to a point/ fact/ argument that is subsequently altered.
Correct referencing includes the date the material was retrieved. The article, as it was on the date in question, can be located in the 'history' section of the article.
Referencing and bibliographies are partly about demonstrating your acquaintance with expert scholarship but Wikipedia is not expert scholarship - it's what 'everybody knows'.
Do not reference Wikipedia articles or include Wikipedia articles in your bibliography.
Why not? Tom's eccentric views which you should ignore in practice but might serve as food for thought....
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, they may be unreliable and generally of poor quality.
A study in the prestigious journal Nature found that Wikipedia articles are as about as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica .
As Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, it is not clear who is the authority to whom you are referring.
If it is accepted that Wikipedia itself is reliable, the lack of an individual authority is unimportant - W. Is the authority.
As Wikipedia articles are constantly changing you may refer to a point/ fact/ argument that is subsequently altered.
Correct referencing includes the date the material was retrieved. The article, as it was on the date in question, can be located in the 'history' section of the article.
Referencing and bibliographies are partly about demonstrating your acquaintance with expert scholarship but Wikipedia is not expert scholarship - it's what 'everybody knows'.
Perhaps but the findings of the Nature study would seem to undermine this conclusion.
