A Brief History of Macroeconomics

download A Brief History of Macroeconomics

of 13

Transcript of A Brief History of Macroeconomics

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    1/13

    A BRIEF HISTORY OFMACROECONOMICS

    JUNE 8, 2011

    June 8, 2011 2

    THE PHASES OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics

    Three seminal phases of the history of macroeconomicthought/practice

    Phase I: Measuring macroeconomic activity (1930s 1950)

    Phase II: Keynesian-inspired macroeconometric models (1950 1970s)

    Phase III: Dynamic General Equilibrium (DGE) methodology (1980s today)

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    2/13

    June 8, 2011 3

    THE BIRTH OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase I

    Macroeconomics born as a field during and because of the GreatDepression

    Idea that government could/should regulate the periodic ups anddowns of the economy rose to prominence

    John Maynard Keynes, The Gene r a l Theo r y o f E mp loy men t ,I n te r es t , and Money (1936)

    Basic tenet: various rigidities in many markets lead to disequilibriathat can last a long time

    Burns and Mitchell, Measur ing Bus iness Cyc les (1946)

    First systematic accounting of the co-movement of various aggregates

    i.e., GDP, consumption, employment, inflation, unemployment rate, etc

    June 8, 2011 4

    LONG-RUN GROWTH VS. BUSINESS CYCLES

    Macro Fundamentals

    Decompose time series into trends and cycles

    Two clear patterns

    Long-run growth

    Frequent and sometimes big short-run fluctuations around long-run

    trend

    time

    Actual GDP (orvirtually any real

    economic series)

    Long-run trend of GDP

    -- a linear trend verysimple; but can also

    construct (more nuanced)nonlinear trends (statisticsand econometrics)

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    3/13

    June 8, 2011 5

    LONG-RUN GROWTH VS. BUSINESS CYCLES

    Macro Fundamentals

    Decompose time series into trends and cycles

    Two clear patterns

    Long-run growth

    Frequent and sometimes big short-run fluctuations around long-runtrend

    Are the short-run fluctuations tightly related to the long-run trend?

    Conventional view in economics has been no But (very) recent work provocatively suggests answer may be yes

    Linkage through R&D: R&D typically thought to be a driver of long-rungrowthbut perhaps cyclical fluctuations in R&D themselves haveconsequences for business cycles (much more research needed here)

    time

    Actual GDP (orvirtually any real

    economic series)

    Long-run trend of GDP

    -- a linear trend very

    simple; but can alsoconstruct (more nuanced)nonlinear trends (statisticsand econometrics)

    June 8, 2011 6

    LONG-RUN GROWTH VS. BUSINESS CYCLES

    Macro Fundamentals

    Decompose time series into trends and cycles

    Two clear patterns

    Long-run growth

    Frequent and sometimes big short-run fluctuations around long-run

    trend

    Are the short-run fluctuations tightly related to the long-run trend?

    Conventional view in economics has been no

    Under the no view, a separation of fields

    Studying the trend (economic growth and development)

    Studying the fluctuations (macroeconomics)

    time

    Actual GDP (orvirtually any real

    economic series)

    Long-run trend of GDP

    -- a linear trend verysimple; but can also

    construct (more nuanced)nonlinear trends (statisticsand econometrics)

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    4/13

    June 8, 2011 7

    BUSINESS CYCLES

    Macro Fundamentals

    Decompose time series into trends and cycles

    time

    Actual GDP (orvirtually any real

    economic series)

    Long-run trend of GDP

    -- a linear trend very

    simple; but can alsoconstruct (more nuanced)nonlinear trends (statisticsand econometrics)

    time0

    Highlight the business cycle movements by subtracting trendGDP from actual GDP (i.e., red line minus blue line)

    Procedure referred to as detrending macroeconomic data

    What explains business cycles?

    June 8, 2011 8

    PRINCIPLES OF KEYNESIAN MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase I

    Basic Tenet: price rigidities/inflexibilities characterize many goodsmarkets and factor markets

    Sticky prices

    (Many) other rigidities/inflexibilities affect markets functioning aswell

    but price (and wage) rigidities the central tenet

    More general discussion in Akerlof (2007) essay

    Which types ofshocks are the main driver of business cycles?

    Policy shocks both monetary policy and fiscal policy

    A basis for policy activism: because of high elasticity of private-sector demand to macroeconomic policy, when/ifother (i.e., non-policy) types of shocks affect the economy, monetary and fiscalpolicy can and should step in to mitigate recessions/depressions

    Keynes Genera l Theor y just a verbal description of things

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    5/13

    June 8, 2011 9

    THE RISE OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase II

    Macroeconomics born as a field during and because of the GreatDepression

    Idea that government could/should regulate the periodic ups anddowns of the economy rose to prominence

    John Maynard Keynes, The Gene r a l Theo r y o f E mp loy men t ,I n te r es t , and Money (1936)

    Basic tenet: various rigidities in many markets lead to disequilibriathat can last a long time

    Burns and Mitchell, Measur ing Bus iness Cyc les (1946)

    First systematic accounting of the co-movement of various aggregates

    i.e., GDP, consumption, employment, inflation, unemployment rate, etc

    How to model (i.e., conceptually/rigorously/mathematicallythink about) business cycles?

    Phase II: The big macroeconometric models

    June 8, 2011 10

    THE GLORY DAYS OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase II

    Big Keynesian macroeconometric models prominent by the1960s, led by

    Kennedys Council of Economic Advisers (Solow, Tobin, Samuelson)

    MIT/Penn/Federal Reserve Board

    ISLM and AS/AD model (Hicks, 1937) the conceptual core

    1 0 2 1 3 2 3

    2 3 1 4 3 5 4

    136 5987 1 5988 1 3 5989 69

    ....

    ...

    ...

    t t t t

    t t t t

    t t t t

    x x x x

    x x x x

    x x x x

    = + + +

    = + + +

    = + + +

    General idea of Keynesian-inspiredmacroeconometric models

    Dozens or hundreds ofvariables and equations

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    6/13

    June 8, 2011 11

    THE GLORY DAYS OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase II

    Big Keynesian macroeconometric models prominent by the1960s, led by

    Kennedys Council of Economic Advisers (Solow, Tobin, Samuelson)

    MIT/Penn/Federal Reserve Board

    ISLM and AS/AD model (Hicks, 1937) the conceptual core

    Statistical relationships between various macro variables

    Basic approach: estimate (econometrically) these equations anduse them for policy advice

    In particular: estimate all the alpha coefficients using historical dataand posit that this is h ow the macroeconomy works

    An approach to macroeconomic policy-making embodied mostsuccinctly in the view and supposed promise of the Phillips Curve

    1 2 3

    2 1 4

    0 1 2

    3 4 5

    5987 5988 5136 1 98

    3

    13 9 69

    3

    ....

    ...

    ...

    t t t

    t t t

    t

    t

    t

    tt t

    x x x

    x x x

    x x x x

    x

    x

    = + + +

    = + + +

    = + + +

    Dozens or hundreds ofvariables and equations,some of which describe

    how policy affects theeconomy

    Say x3 and x13 are policyvariables

    Its all about estimating the

    alpha terms

    General idea of Keynesian-inspiredmacroeconometric models

    June 8, 2011 12

    THE PHILLIPS CURVE

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase II

    A seemingly stable, predictable relationship between an economysinflation rate and unemployment rate

    Came to be the centerpiece of the Keynesian macroeconometricagenda

    Came to be the centerpiece for policy advice

    for fiscal policy (given forceful voice during the Kennedyadministration CEA populated with future Nobel Laureates RobertSolow, James Tobin, Paul SamuelsonJohn Kenneth Galbraith a moremuted enthusiast of this approach to policy formulation)

    and eventually for monetary policy (rise of an activist Fed:raising/lowering interest rates to fine tune macroeconomicperformance

    unemployment rate

    inflationrate

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    7/13

    June 8, 2011 13

    THE GLORY DAYS OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase II

    Big Keynesian macroeconometric models prominent by the1960s, led by

    Kennedys Council of Economic Advisers (Solow, Tobin, Samuelson)

    MIT/Penn/Federal Reserve Board

    ISLM and AS/AD model (Hicks, 1937) the conceptual core

    Became widely used for policy-making

    General idea of Keynesian-inspiredmacroeconometric models

    One of these equations is thePhillips Curve

    1 2 3

    2 1 4

    0 1 2

    3 4 5

    5987 5988 5136 1 98

    3

    13 9 69

    3

    ....

    ...

    ...

    t t t

    t t t

    t

    t

    t

    tt t

    x x x

    x x x

    x x x x

    x

    x

    = + + +

    = + + +

    = + + +

    Dozens or hundreds ofvariables and equations,some of which describe

    how policy affects theeconomy

    Say x3 and x13 are policyvariables

    June 8, 2011 14

    THE FALL OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase II

    Big Keynesian macroeconometric models prominent by the1960s, led by

    Kennedys Council of Economic Advisers (Solow, Tobin, Samuelson)

    MIT/Penn/Federal Reserve Board

    ISLM and AS/AD model (Hicks, 1937) the conceptual core

    Became widely used for policy-making

    until they stopped working in the 1970s Amidst a high-inflation environment (U.S. inflation between 15-20% in

    second half of 1970s), sparked by OPEC oil embargoes

    Lucas Critique (1976): The alphas themselves should be thoughtof / modeled as f unc t i ons of government policy!

    1 2 3

    2 1 4

    0 1 2

    3 4 5

    5987 5988 5136 1 98

    3

    13 9 69

    3

    ....

    ...

    ...

    t t t

    t t t

    t

    t

    t

    tt t

    x x x

    x x x

    x x x x

    x

    x

    = + + +

    = + + +

    = + + +

    Dozens or hundreds ofvariables and equations,some of which describehow policy affects the

    economy

    Say x3 and x13 are policyvariables

    General idea of Keynesian-inspiredmacroeconometric models

    One of these equations is thePhillips Curve

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    8/13

    June 8, 2011 15

    THE LUCAS CRITIQUE

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Between Phase II and Phase III

    Crucial inconsistency in Keynesian macroeconometric approach

    The estimated coefficients (the alphas) themselves may change ifpolicy (monetary and/or fiscal) changes!

    In which case the macroeconometric approach cannot usefully givepolicy advice unless one knows/makes assumptions about how thealphas themselves depend on policy

    Discovered in the 1970s amidst world-wide macroeconomicturbulence caused (seemingly) by the two oil crises

    The usual Phillips relation stopped working even as policy-makerstried harder than ever to exploit it

    Led to breakdown of existing macroeconomic theory and opened thedoor for a complete re-thinking of the basic tenets of macroeconomics

    Keynesian macroeconometric models are n o t e co n o m i c m o d e l s

    Merely a statistical description of historical events Economics: the study of how incentives influence behavior of

    individuals/market participants

    A damning criticism of the entire macroeconomics profession

    This problemwas alwayspresent, butdidnt revealitself until the1970s

    June 8, 2011 16

    THE FALL OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase III

    Macroeconomics born as a field during and because of the GreatDepression

    Idea that government could/should regulate the periodic ups anddowns of the economy rose to prominence

    John Maynard Keynes, The Gene r a l Theo r y o f E mp loy men t ,I n te r es t , and Money (1936)

    Basic tenet: various rigidities in many markets lead to disequilibriathat can last a long time

    Burns and Mitchell, Measur ing Bus iness Cyc les (1946)

    First systematic accounting of the co-movement of various aggregates

    i.e., GDP, consumption, employment, inflation, unemployment rate, etc

    How to model (i.e., conceptually/rigorously/mathematicallythink about) business cycles?

    Phase II: The big macroeconometric models

    Death knell spelled by the devastating Lucas Critique

    Phase III: Microeconomic foundations and DGE modeling

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    9/13

    June 8, 2011 17

    THE REBIRTH OF MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase III

    Kydland and Prescott (1982), Long and Plosser (1983)

    A dynamic general equilibrium (DGE) view of business cycles

    A real business cycle (RBC)

    TFP shocks the driving force, not policy shocks

    Business cycles are efficient and natural

    so macroeconomic policy aimed at stabilizing cycles is

    unimportant/misguided

    An economic theory, not a statistical theory

    Building blocks

    Consumer preferences

    Production technology

    Interactions through markets (goods, labor, and financial markets)

    The alphas are functions of policy variables (if policy variablespresent in the model)

    thus immune to Lucas Critique

    June 8, 2011 18

    PRINCIPLES OF RBC MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase III

    Basic Tenets

    Markets operate (nearly) perfectly competitively

    Price rigidities/inflexibilities are n ot very important conceptual breakfrom Keynesian principles

    Model the economic interactions, not merely the statisticalrelationships methodological break from Keynesian principles

    Which types ofshocks are the main driver of business cycles?

    TFP shocks (not policy another conceptual break from Keynesianism)

    How to measure TFP? As a residual, using Cobb-Douglasproduction function

    1output ( , )t t t t t t t A f k n A k n

    = =

    Whats left overafter accounting for what we can account for

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    10/13

    June 8, 2011 19

    PRINCIPLES OF RBC MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase III

    Basic Tenets

    Markets operate (nearly) perfectly competitively

    Price rigidities/inflexibilities are n ot very important conceptual breakfrom Keynesian principles

    Model the economic interactions, not merely the statisticalrelationships methodological break from Keynesian principles

    Which types ofshocks are the main driver of business cycles?

    TFP shocks (not policy another conceptual break from Keynesianism)

    How to measure TFP? As a residual, using Cobb-Douglasproduction function

    1output ( , )t t t t t t t A f k n A k n

    = =

    Whats left overafter accounting for what we can account for

    1.1161617.62010

    1.2161619.22009

    1.291614.420081.091612.02007

    TFPLaborCapitalOutputPeriod

    Suppose alpha =

    0.5 for simplicity

    (U.S. economy:alpha 0.30)

    Productivity improved between 2007 and 2008

    Productivity stagnated between 2008 and 2009

    Productivity declined between 2009 and 2010

    EXAMPLE

    June 8, 2011 20

    PRINCIPLES OF RBC MACROECONOMICS

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase III

    Shocks to TFP are persistent

    Once A t rises unexpectedly, TFP tends to stay elevated for multipleperiods

    Example: IfA2000 > A1999, then A2001 is likely to be higher than A1999 aswell, but not as large as A2000

    A slowly-dampening time-profile of TFP

    RBC view

    Persistent TFP shocks the driver of business cycles

    NOT policy shocks

    time

    The periodof theshock

    Gradual return to steady-state

    steady-state TFP

    Detrended TFPseries (i.e., actualTFP displayslong-run growth)

    Over two-thirds ofbusiness-cyclefluctuations driven byTFP shocks

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    11/13

    June 8, 2011 21

    RBC MECHANISM: AN EXAMPLE

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase III

    Positive TFP shock occurs (i.e., TFPrises)

    Effect on labor market: rise in A t risein MP Nt shift in labor demand

    Effect on capital demand: rise in A trise in A t+1 (because shocks arepersistent) rise in MPKt+1 shift incapital demand

    labor

    real

    wage

    D

    rise in A

    inv

    r

    investment demandfunction

    rise in A

    June 8, 2011 22

    RBC MECHANISM: AN EXAMPLE

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Phase III

    Positive TFP shock occurs (i.e., TFPrises)

    Effect on labor market: rise in A t risein MP Nt shift in labor demand

    Effect on capital demand: rise in A trise in A t+1 (because shocks arepersistent) rise in MPKt+1 shift incapital demand

    labor

    realwage

    D

    rise in A

    inv

    r

    investment demandfunction

    rise in A

    S

    S

    Superimposing the supply sides of thelabor and capital markets:

    1. Investment (one of the componentsof GDP) rises

    2. EQUILIBRIUM quantity of labor

    rises

    3. Hence total output (i.e., GDP) rises(because both A t and nt rise)

    TFP shocks lead to fluctuations in GDP

    What is TFP? Could be

    1. Literally technology (better

    computers, etc.)

    2. Better-educated workers3. More open international trade

    4. Financial market conditions

    5.

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    12/13

    June 8, 2011 23

    UNDERSTANDING EQUILIBRIUM

    Macro Fundamentals

    Prices coordinate activity of suppliers and demanders (whether P,w, or r; basic idea same in any market)

    Macro markets (suppose no taxes anywhere for simplicity)

    D

    S

    equilibrium price

    ( , )

    ( , )

    l t tt

    c t t

    u c lw

    u c l=

    1

    '( )1

    '( )

    tt

    t

    u cr

    u c += +

    Consumption-leisureoptimality condition

    Consumption-savingsoptimality condition

    CONSUMERS

    June 8, 2011 24

    UNDERSTANDING EQUILIBRIUM

    Macro Fundamentals

    Prices coordinate activity of suppliers and demanders (whether P,w, or r; basic idea same in any market)

    Macro markets (suppose no taxes anywhere for simplicity)

    D

    S

    equilibrium price

    ( ( , ))t t t n t t

    w mpn A f k n= =

    ( ( , ))t t t k t t

    r mpk A f k n= =

    Optimal labor demand

    Optimal investmentdemand

    FIRMS

  • 8/4/2019 A Brief History of Macroeconomics

    13/13

    June 8, 2011 25

    UNDERSTANDING EQUILIBRIUM

    Macro Fundamentals

    Prices coordinate activity of suppliers and demanders (whether P,w, or r; basic idea same in any market)

    Macro markets (suppose no taxes anywhere for simplicity)

    Prices anonymously coordinate activity of suppliers and demanders

    Invisible hand described by Adam Smith (Wea l th o f N a t i ons , 1776)

    D

    S

    equilibrium price

    ( , )

    ( , )

    l t tt

    c t t

    u c lmpn

    u c l=

    1

    '( )1

    '( )

    tt

    t

    u cmpk

    u c += +

    EQUILIBRIUM IN THE LABOR MARKET

    EQUILIBRIUM IN THE CAPITAL MARKET

    June 8, 2011 26

    WHERE IS MACROECONOMICS TODAY?

    The Evolution of Macroeconomics: Next?

    Keynesian Macroeconomics

    Ideology: Price rigidities/sticky prices

    Policy stance: policy (fiscal and monetary) of crucial importance formacroeconomic performance

    Methodology: econometric/statistical modeling

    RBC Macroeconomics

    Ideology: Prices are not rigid or sticky

    Policy stance: policy (neither fiscal nor monetary) not very importantfor macroeconomic performance

    Methodology: dynamic general equilibrium modeling

    New Keynesian Macroeconomics

    Ideology: Price rigidities/sticky prices Policy stance: policy (fiscal and monetary) of crucial importance for

    macroeconomic performance

    Methodology: dynamic general equilibrium modeling

    A central issue in macroeconomics: monetary neutrality?

    Does monetary policy have long-lasting effects on rea l economy?

    The enduring imprint of the RBC revolution

    Empirical evidence still EXTREMELY mixedon this