Best Available Copy

AD-A281 811 53 6;3

Community Environmental ResponseFacilitation Act (CERFA) ReportYoungs Lake Housing AreaRenton, WA

Prepared for

U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTERABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND 21010

Prepared by

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC.855 Springdale DriveExton, PA 19341

I limit tos vmont * 0 ~TICo eawl n of vi1 o or intl % LE

11 API 199 E 1___1__of______U

DT DttLr 1010c''~

94 7 12 4 32AEC Form' 45, 1 Feb 93 replaces THAMA Form 45 which Is obsolete.

FINAL

Community Environmental ResponseFacilitation Act (CERFA) ReportYoungs Lake Housing AreaRenton, WA

Prepared forU.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTERABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND 21010

Prepared byENVIRONMENTAL 'RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC.855 Springdale DriveExton, PA 19341

usa

Aaceuuion For

11 APRIL 1994 utflsin

ST #A, AUTR1: USAF1/SFIM-AFIC-RMI vI edo

(MS. BARRY -DSN 584-1659) De poa

PER TELBXCON 14 JULY 94 CB

The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) andshould not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision,unless so designated by other documentation.

The use of trade names In this report does not constitute an official endorsement or approval ofSouse of such commercial products. This report may not be cited for purposes ofadvertisement.

- .- -..--- 'JY--i-

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE O N! . .g m u

Wmu4/ ~ o mmm. - e- --. -e e a u Se ~So ., , M so "no " . Pm.,.,, , AsW cUW

i MV(L"e Nlk) 3. "OSTDAT & EPOT TV" AND OATES COVEREDSA Aril 1994 I Final

Commmity Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA) Contract No.Report, Youngs Lake Housing Area, Renton, Washington DAAA15-91-D-0011;

Delivery Order DA06

B. Laurenson, D. Schultheisz, L. Ward

7. PwOO =' ORGNIZI1O AM(S) AND AONGESS(ES) IL PINPORMIN ORGANIZAIONREPORT NIUSER

ERM, Inc.855 Springdale Drive N/AExton, PA 19341

3. SONSOWNGIMOMTORNG AGNC- NAME(S) AND AODRESS(ES) 10. SPONO 'AGENC REORT fNUMIE

U.S. Army Environmental Center SFIM-AEC-BC-CR-94051Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010

11. SUPPLEMENTARY MOTES

Report is contained in one volume

1i. IDISTUUVIOU I AVA MM.AUJTY STATEMENT 12b. O6STROBUUIO CODE

Distribution Unlimited

tM AITRACT (MWmm'20 WThis report presents the results of the Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA)investigation conducted by Environmental Resources Management (ERM) at the Youngs Lake Housing Area, a U.S.Government property selected for closure by the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission underPublic Laws 100-526 and 101-510. Under CERFA (Public Law 102-426), Federal agencies are required toidentify expeditiously real property that can be immediately reused and redeveloped. Satisfying thisobJective requires the identification of real property where no hazardous substances or petroleumproducts, regulated by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA),were stored for one year or more, known to have been released, or disposed.The Youngs Lake Housing Area is a 9.42-acre site located in Renton, Washington. Youngs Lake is a

military housing complex containing 28 single family housing units. It was constructed in the late 1950sto support a nearby Nike Missile site. A fuel oil storage tank is located at each of the units.ERM reviewed existing investigation documents; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), State, and

county regulatory records; environmental data bases; and title documents pertaining to Youngs Lake duringthis investigation. In addition, ERM conducted interviews and visual inspections of Youngs Lake as well asvisual inspections of and data base searches for the surrounding properties.

Information in this CERFA report was current as of April 1994. This information was used to divide theinstallation into one category of parcels: CERFA Disqualified Parcels as defined by the Army.The total BRAC property acreage at Youngs Lake is 9.42 acres. Areas of the facility that have no

history of CERCLA-regulated hazardous substance or petroleum product release, disposal, or storage for oneear or more; and no history of other environmental hazards (such as asbestos, radon gas, lead-based

* aint, unexploded ordnance, radionuclides, or not in-use equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls),re categorized as CERFA Parcels. 1o CERFA Parcels were identified.

s.l T . _-___ O_ P P& W:1_--S27

oungI Lake Housing Area, CERFA, Base Closure, BRAC &S =

17. 53 1 O.AIEI 'Nis SIUN~ff CLASUWCATMO 11L 5SEQ IM ASWIATIO

Unclassifiod sified Unclassified SARi asi i

SOAdPManO.26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

EXECUTVE SUMARY ES-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1-1

12 DEFLNTON OF TERMS 1-2

13 GEOGRAPICALENVIRONMENTAL SETTNG 1.4

2.0 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION 2-1

2.1 EXISTIG IrNVESTIGATION DOCUMENTS 2-1

2.2 GOVERNMENT REGULATORY RECORDS 2-2

23 INTERVIEWS 2-3

2.4 VISUAL INSPECTIONS 2-3

2.5 TTLE DOCUMENTS 2-3

3.0 PROPERTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3-1

3.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OPERATIONAL HISTORY 3-1

3.2 CHANGES TO REAL PROPERTY ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSSINCE ENHANCED PA INVESTIGATION 3-2

4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS 4-1

4.1 PREVIOUSLY IDENIMED AREAS REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION MMRES) 4-1

4.2 ADDITIONAL AREAS IDENTIFIED 4-3

4.3 ADJACENTISURROUNDING PROPERTIES 4-3

4.4 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL, HAZARD, AND SAFETY ISSUES 4-3

(5 CERFA EXCLUDED PROPERTY 4-4

5.0 STE PARCEZATION 5-1

! Ii i I II I , , ,

5.1 CZRFA CATEGORYAND DESIGNAITON MAP 5-3

5.2 CERFA TRACTMAP 5-3

53 CERFA PARCEL DESIGNATORS 5-3

LIST OF FIGURES FOLLOWING PAGE

13-1 Locatiox Map of Washitox Army Homsing Facilities 1-S13-2 Vicinity Map of Yomug Lake Hosixg Units i-s

LIST OF TABLES FOLLOWING PAGE

23-1 List of Interviewees for Youngs Lake CERFA Assessoet 2-4t4-1 B'ldings with CERFA Qualifiers 4-45.1-1 CERFA Map Table 5-2

APPENDIX

V

7/ \

')i;!

ACRONYMS AND AUBREVIA1TONS

ACM Asbestos Caftaining Material

AEHA Army Envisrmental Hygiene Agency

AREE Area Requirig Environmental Evaluation

AST Aboveground Storage Tank

BRAC Base Realgmn and Closure

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Act

CERCUS Comprehensive Envirornental Response,Compensation, and Liability Information System

CERFA Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act

CPO Chief Petty Officer

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

ERM Environmental Resources Management

ERNS Emergency Response Notification System

f/cc Fibers Per Cubic Centimeter

FS Feasibility Study

FY Fiscal Year

GER Geotechnical Environmental Restoration

HrTRW Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste

IRP Installation Restoration Program

Lap Lead-baised Paint

4NrEPA National Envlronientai Policy Act

NPDES National Pollutant Disdrge Elimination System

NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission

OF Degrees Fahrenheit

PA Preliminary Assessment

PCB Polyddornated Biphenyl

pCi/l Piocurles Per Liter

POL Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricant

ppb Parts Per Billion

ppm Parts Per Million

PUD Public Utility District

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

RI Remedial Investigation

SI Site Inspection

USAEC US. Army Environmental Center

USATHAMA U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency

USDA US. Department of Agriculture

UST Underground Storage Tank

UXO Unexploded Ordnance

WDOE Washington Department of Ecology

2i

• i . .. .i ': m m : m ni . . ..... I . .. .. . i " 2

EXTCUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the results of the Community EnvironmentalResponse Facilitation Act (CERFA) investigation conducted byEnvironmental Resources Management (ERM) at the Youngs LakeHousing Area, a U.S. Government property selected for closure by theBase Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission under Public Laws100-526 and 101-510. Under CERFA (Public Law 102-426), Federalagencies are required to identify expeditiously real property that can beimmediately reused and redeveloped. Satisfying this objective requiresthe identification of real property where no hazardous substances orpetroleum products, regulated by the Comprehensive EnvironmentalResponse, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), were stored forone year or more, known to have been released, or disposed.

The Youngs Lake Housing Area is a 9.42-acre site located in Renton,Washington. Youngs Lake is a military housing complex containing 28single family housing units. It was constructed in the late 1950s to supporta nearby Nike Missile site. A fuel oil storage tank is located at each of theunits.

ERM reviewed existing investigation documents; U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA), State, and county regulatory records;environmental data bases; and title documents pertaining to Youngs Lakeduring this investigation. In addition, ERM conducted interviews andvisual inspections of Youngs Lake as well as visual inspections of and database searches for the surrounding properties.

Information in this CERFA report was current as of April 1994. Thisinformation was used to divide the installation into one category ofparcels: CERFA Disqualified Parcels as defined by the Army.

The total BRAC property acreage at Youngs Lake is 9.42 acres. Areas ofthe facility that have no history of CERCLA-regulated hazardoussul tance or petroleum product release, disposal, or storage for one year(r mote; and to hisitffy of oiter envlrtotttmentiAl lards (eul a aObWSo4,radon gas, lead-based paint, unexploded ordnance, radionuclides, or notin-use equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls), are categorizedas CERFA Parcels. No CERFA Parcels were identified.

ESdGDL M CWA YUNMDLAXKl.V2WAp , 71994

Areas of the facility that had no evidence of CERCLA-regulatedhazardous substance or petroleum product release, disposal, or storage forone year or more, but contained other environmental hazards (such asasbestos, radon gas, lead-based paint, unexploded ordnance,radionuclides, or not in-use equipment containing polychlorinatedbiphenyls) were categorized as CERFA Qualified Parcels. No CERFAQualified Parcels were identified.

Areas of the facility, for which there is a history of release, disposal, orstorage for one year or more of CERCLA-regulated hazardous substancesor petroleum products or had a release of the other environmental hazardsidentified above were categorized as CERFA Disqualified Parcels. Theentire site, 9.42 acres, was determined to be a Disqualified Parcel.

Areas on the facility that will be retained by the Federal Government orthat have already been transferred by deed are categorized as CERFAExcluded Parcels. None of the property is CERFA Excluded.

The primary objective of CERFA is satisfied by the identification ofCERFA Parcels and CERFA Qualified Parcels. As a result, concurrencehas been sought from the regulatory agencies on these two categories ofparcels. This CERFA Report has been reviewed by the U.S. ArmyEnvironmental Center (USAEC), EPA Region X, and the WashingtonDepartment of Ecology (WDOE). Comments from regulatory agenciesand USAEC's response to those comments are located in the Appendix.Concurrence on this report was received from WDOE.

This report contains maps that summarize the categorization of YoungsLake on the basis of the above definitions. This Executive Summaryshould be read only in conjunction with the complete CERFA Report forthis installation. The CERFA Report provides the relevant environmentalhistory to substantiate the parcel categorization. This report does notaddress other property transfer requirements that may be applicableunder the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), nor does it addressnatural resource considerations such as the threat to plant or animal life.

"oa"ES-2 CWAkWJ*=LMAU.MT.U.E

1.0 INTRODUC1ION

1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Public Laws 100-526 and 101-510 designated more than 100 Department ofArmy facil ies for closure and realignment. As a result, it becamenecessary to expedite the environmental investigation and cleanupprocess, as necessary, prior to the release and reuse of Army BaseRealignment and Closure (BRAC) property. The BRAC environmentalrestoration program was established in 1989 with the first round (BRAC88) of base closures and continued with subsequent rounds (BRAC 91,BRAC 93, etc.). The BRAC program is patterned after the Army'sInstallation Restoration Program (IRP), except that it has been expanded toinclude such categories of contamination as asbestos, radon,polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and others that are not normallyaddressed under the Army IRP.

The BRAC environmental restoration program begins by conductingenhanced Preliminary Assessments (PAs). The term "enhanced" is usedto distinguish these assessments from previous IRP preliminaryassessments since the BRAC PAs are conducted from a property transferperspective and evaluate areas which are not included in the IRP (e.g.,asbestos, radon, PCBs). The enhanced PAs include reviews of existinginstallation documents, regulatory records, and aerial photographs; a sitevisit and visual inspection; and employee interviews. Enhanced PAs wereconducted for BRAC 88 and BRAC 91 installations, and are currentlyunderway at BRAC 93 installations. An Enhanced PA was prepared forthe Youngs Lake Housing Area in November 1989 by the EnvironmentalResearch Division of Argonne National Laboratory under the direction ofUSAEC (formerly the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency[USATHAMA]).

In October 1992, Public Law 102-426, the Community EnvironmentalResponse Facilitation Act (CERFA) amended Section 120 (h) of theComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and LiabilityAct (CERCLA) and established new requirements with respect tocontamination assessment, cleanup, and regulatory agencynotification/concurrence for federal facility closures. CERFA requires thefederal government,, before termination of federal activities on realproperty owned, to identify property where no hazardous substanceswere stored, released, or disposed of. Also, the designation must beconcurred with by the appopr:ate regulatory agency (U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency for National Priority List (NPL) bases and state for non-

TIE MCW~W 14CWA YOM WM.-WAX.WUOAPffl . 1994

NPL bases). These requirements retroactively affect the Army BRAC 88and BRAC 91 environmental restoration activities, and are beingimplemented at BRAC 93 sites concurrently with their enhanced PAs. Thepi .i- ry CERFA objective is for federal agencies to expeditiously identifyreal property offering the greatest opportunity for immediate reuse andredevelopment. Although CERFA does not mandate the Army transferreal property so identified, the first step in satisfying the objective is therequirement to identify real property where no CERCLA-regulatedhazardous substances or petroleum products were stored, released, ordisposed.

Environmental Resources Management, Inc. (ERM) was awarded the taskto identify real property where no CERCLA-regulated hazardoussubstances or petroleum products were stored, released, or disposed attwelve BRAC 88 sites. Under this task, an Execution Plan was developedto describe the process in satisfying the CERFA task objective. Thepurpose of this report is to present the findings for the Youngs LakeHousing Area, Washington.

1.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS

The following definitions are used to categorize and label parcelsidentified on the installation:

* CERFA Parcel - A portion of the installation real property for whichinvestigation reveals no evidence of storage for one year or more,release, or disposal of CERCLA hazardous substances, petroleum, orpetroleum derivatives and no evidence of being threatened bymigration of such substances. CERFA Parcels include areas wherePCB containing equipment is in operation, but there is no evidence ofrelease. CERFA Parcels also include any portion of the installationwhich once contained related environmental, hazard, or safety issuesincluding unexploded ordnance (UXO) located on firing ranges orimpact areas, radon, stored (not in-use) PCB containing equipment,asbestos contained within building materials, radionuclides containedwithin products being used for their intended purposes, and lead-based paint applied to building material surfaces, but which havesince been fully remediated or removed.

CERFA Qualified Parcel - A portion of the installation real propertyfor which investigation reveals no evidence of storage for one year ormore, release, or disposal of CERCLA hazardous substances,petroleum, or petroleum derivatives and no evidence of beingthreatened by migration of such substances. Parcel does, however,contain related environmental, hazard, or safety issues Includingunexploded ordnance (UXO) located on firing ranges or impact areas,

71 M , CE~VP 1-2 CA IUNX .N. ,, ?. 9,W

radon, radionuclides contained within products being used for theirintended purposes, asbestos contained within building materials,lead-based paint applied to building material surfaces, or stored (notin use) PCB-containing equipment.

CERFA Disqualified Parcel - A portion of the installation realproperty for which investigation reveals evidence of a release,disposal, or storage for more than one year of a CERCLA hazardoussubstance, petroleum, or petroleum derivative; or a portion of theinstallation threatened by such a release or disposal. CERFADisqualified Parcels also include any portion of the installation wherePCB, asbestos containing material, lead-based paint residue,radionuclides, or any ordnance has been disposed of, and anylocations where chemical ordnance has been stored. Additionally,CERFA Disqualified Parcels include any areas in which CERCLAhazardous substances or petroleum products have been released ordisposed of and subsequently fully remediated.

* CERFA Excluded Parcel - A portion of the installation real propertyretained by the Department of Defense, and therefore not explicitlyinvestigated for CERFA. CERFA Excluded Parcels also include anyportions of the installation which have already been transferred bydeed to a party outside the federal government, or by transferassembly to another federal agency.

The following labels are used in conjunction with the identified parcels.Each parcel is given a unique number to which the appropriate labels areattached.

• P = CERFA Parcel

* Q = CERFA Qualified Parcel

* D = CERFA Disqualified Parcel

• E = CERFA Fxcluded Parcel

EXAMPLE: 4P indicates that the fourth parcel is in the CERFA Parcelcategory.

The presence of related environmental, hazard, and safety issues,responsible for placing a parcel in the CERFA Qualified Parcel category, isindicated by the following labels:

SA = Asbestos

* L = Lead-Based Paint

SP = PCB

SR = Radon

MinGW 1-3 CWAYN~WLAMiWWoA6AI..M9

* X = Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

* RD = Radionudides

EXAMPLE: 5Q-L indicated that the fifth parcel is in the CERFA QualifiedParcel categy because of the presence of lead-based paint.

The foilowing designatios are used to indicate the type of contaminationor storage present in a parcel. Conditions responsible for placing a parcelin the CERFA Disqualified category are indicated by the following-

* PR = Petroleum Release

* PS = Petroleum Storage

H HR = Hazardous Release

* HS = Hazardous Storage

EXAMPLE: 12D-HR indicates that the twelfth parcel is in the CERFADisqualified category because of evidence of hazardous release.

For all parcels, (P) [i.e., P with parentheses around it] is used to indicatethat the presence of the contamination is possible, but that data isunavailable for verification.

EXAMPLE: 9Q-A(P) indicates that the ninth parcel is in the CERFAQualified Parcel category because of the possible presence (unverified) ofACM.

OTHER EXAMPLES:

Parcel label 15D-HR/PS/A(P) indicates that the 15th parcel is in theCERFA Disqualified category based on evidence of a hazardous substancerelease and petroleum storage. It also contains possible ACM.

Parcel label 8Q-X/R indicates that the eighth parcel is in the CERFAQualified Parcel category because of the presence of unexploded ordnanceand radon.

13 GEOGRAPHCAUENVIRONMENTAL SE7FNG

The Youngs Lake Housing Area (Youngs Lake) is a military housing arealocated in King County, Washington, approximately five miles south ofthe town of Renton. Renton lies on the southeastern edge of the Seattlemetropolitan district Youngs Lake is approximately six miles south of

n1-4 cAmuIA V auWmWL 0.A7. "N

Lake Washington and seven miles east of Ptqe Sourtd, which foms thewestern boundary of King County (fgure 1.3-1).

The site under CERFA investigation is a rectangular shaped property of9.42 acres containing 28 single-family housing units. The site is developedto accommodate its residential purpose, with paved roads, a bus waitingshelter, and a playground. Originally constructed to support the Seattle-area Nike missile defense system, the site is now operated and maintainedby the United States Coast Guard under a leasing agreement with theArmy. The site is bounded by 116th Avenue on the east, 192nd Street onthe south, and private residential property on the north and west. Thegeneral slope of the area is to the west. The surrounding land is gentlyroling to flat (Fgure 13-2).

The Youngs Lake housing site is located on the Des Moines drift plain inthe Puget Sound lowland. This drift plain merges eastward with glaciatedfoothills of the Cascade Range. The foothills are protruding parts of aTertiary bedrock surface that descends westward beneath Quaternarydeposits more than a thousand feet thick. Rocks of Tertiary age includesedimentary and volcanic rocks, and the Homer Bluff Formation.Virtually all Tertiary rocks are either too fine-grained or too highly alteredto yield ground water at a rate higher than 50 gallons per minute.

Quaternary deposits are the chief source of ground water in the area. TheSalmon Springs drift plain and Vashon advance outwash contain the mostproductive aquifers beneath the Des Moines drift plain. The SalmonSprings drift plain is a sequence of sand, gravel, clay, and till. Theformation is nearly 400 feet thick beneath a large part of the Des Moinesdrift plain; its base is dose to or slightly below sea level. Advanceoutwash underlying the Des Moines drift plain consists predominantly ofsand, with some layers of pebble-cobble gravel.

The mean monthly temperature in the Seattle area varies from 380 F inJanuary to 65°F in July. The prevailing wind direction in Seattle is fromthe south during most of the year, and southeasterly from October toDecember. King County and the Youngs Lake Housing Area lie withinthe lowlands area surrounding Puget Sound, and receive approximately41 inches per year of precipitation annually. December is the wettestmonth, with July and August normally the driest months. Thunderstormsare uncommon, occurring about five times per year on average.

1-5 cAW tmLAxIW3.Api,.

Figure 1 .3-1Location Map of Washington Army Housing Facilities

Renton, Washington

ISAN

*I VASHON

/ ISLAND

YONG LK

YAP Lhftmvy WWf.* Nsvmbw IU.

Figure 1.3-2Vicinity Map of Youngs Lake Housing Units

Renton, Washington

~WSA~mV Wb I ~L*s tUB

S 2ro S

I r -!-

2.0 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION

The scope of the CERFA investigation includes:

* Review of previous environmental investigations, assessments,reports, etc.

• Review of applicable government regulatory records: federal, state,and local (where applicable and available).

* Interviews with representatives from the installation (or commandresponsible for the installation), other federal agencies, regulatoryofficials, and others.

* Review of maps and aerial photographs (where available).

* Inspection of adjacent property that potentially could contaminate theBRAC property.

" Detailed site inspection (the scope of these site inspections wasdetermined principally by the review of previous investigations andassessments).

* Review of recorded chain of title documents.

These seven activities are specifically included within the statutory scopeof CERFA. All seven activities were conducted during the CERFAinvestigation at Youngs Lake.

2.1 EXISTING INVESTIGATION DOCUlMENh

The activities at Youngs Lake are not of such a nature as to pose a threat tohuman health or the environment However, several studies of issues ofparticular relevance to housing areas have been performed. Thedocuments listed below were used as primary sources of informationduring the CERFA investigation.

1. Radon Monitoring Army Stand-Alone Housing Units, Final Report,Argonne National Laboratory, April 1990.

2. Enhanced Preliminary Assessnt Report, Youngs Lake Army HousingUnits, Renton, Washington, Argonne National Laboratory,Novmber 1969.

3. Report of ampling and Anai Remlts, 'Youngs LAe Army HousingUnits, Renton, Washington, Roy F. Weston, Inc., August 1990.

('1t " , uinin, 2-1 muw a.,.,l,

.................

4. AsbWs Air Monitoring Results at Elewe Fmily Housing ArasThroughout the United States, Versar, Inc., May 1991.

2.2 GOVEMRNENT REGULATORY RECORDS

Federal Records

Records of environmental releases were obtained from the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Region X (EPA) in Seattle, Washingtonin October 1993. The Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) listing dated30 July 1993 was reviewed. CERCLIS provides information on sites forwhich corrective action is considered a priority by EPA. No sites in thevicinity of the Youngs Lake Housing Area were listed. Informationcollected from EPA corroborated the information obtained from thedocuments listed in Section 2.1 above and the CERFA site visit. No newinformation regarding releases or the potential for environmentalcontamination of the site was identified.

A search of the EPA's Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)database over the period 30 January-2 February 1994 identified no reportsof releases of oil or hazardous substances at Youngs Lake since theinception of the database in 1986. ERNS collects information on releasesreported to Federal authorities.

State Records

Records of environmental releases were obtained from the WashingtonDepartment of Ecology (WDOE) in Seattle, Washington in October 1993.The Affected Media and Contamination Report (now the Confirmed andSuspected Contaminated Sites Report) was reviewed to identify reportedreleases in the vicinity of Youngs Lake. No such releases were listed in thelisting of 13 October 1993. Information collected from WDOEcorroborated the information obtained from the documents listed inSection 2.1 above and the CERFA site visit. No new informationregarding releases or the potential for environmental contamination of thesite was uncovered.

NRC Records

No activities took place at the Younp Lake Housing Area that wouldrequire the issuance of a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) license towork with radioactive material

uuinsmo 2-2 am uWs.,u .. ,m

AEHLA Rwonb

A records search conducted by the US. Army Environmental HygienceAgency (AEHA) revealed no reports regarding the use of radioactivematerials at Youngs Lake.

23 IT VEWS

Table 2.3-1 provides a summary for those individuals interviewed duringthe CERFA investigation.

2A VISUAL INSPECTIONS

A site walkover and detailed inspection was conducted on 22 September1993. ERM inspectors were accompanied by Mr. Joseph Ricci, USAECProject Officer and Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Douglas Burroughs, U.S.Coast Guard. The subject property was inspected for present uses andareas of environmental concern, such as areas of discolored or stained soil,drums, areas of open dumping, vent lines and/or fill lids associated withUSTs, and electrical transformers which may use fluids containingpolychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

The perimeter of the property was traversed to the site boundaries. Eachhousing unit was inspected from the outside, as was the playgroundlocated at the center of the complex. The units were constructed usingtwo designs, known as "Capehart" and "MCA". Two housing units,Numbers 17 and 05, were inspected from the inside. Unit 17 is one of thesixteen Capehart units and Unit 05 is one of the twelve MCA units.Because all 28 units were constructed in 1957-1958 of one of the twoconstruction styles, these two units are considered representative of thecurrently existing conditions at Youngs Lake. The two units inspectedwere vacant and were selected at the suggestion of CPO Burroughs, whois responsible for maintaining and managing the property under the termsof the leasing agreement between the Coast Guard and the Army.

2.5 TITLE DOCUMEN7S

ERM conducted a review of tract maps and transfer documents to identifythe prior property owners of the YounsW Lake property at the time of itstransfer to the Army. The purpose of this review was to collect additionalinformation concerning the property's prior use and environmentalcondition at the time of its transfer to the Army. Based on this review, no

=MM" 2-3 ciA UMXaIAm..ftAs. A.'.

additional normation was collected. Previous ownership and the datesof transfer to the Army are indicated on Figure 5.2-1.

24I

49

v

iiJjiii

3! %% .1 :

3.0 PROPERTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This section provides a description of the BRAC property and a discussionof its operational history (Section 3.1), and a description of any changes toenvironmental conditions since the last environmental assessment orInvestigation (Section 3.2).

3.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OPERATIONAL HISTORY

The Youngs Lake Housing Area is a military housing property situated inthe State of Washington, approximately ten miles southeast of Seattle. Theproperty covers 9.42 acres in a largely residential community. Its 28independent single-family units offer housing for members of the militaryand their dependents. The maps in Section 5 provide a layout of the site.

The housing units are all one of two similar designs (one design style isknown as Capehart, the other as MCA) with attached carports and storageareas. The buildings are single-level structures, constructed on concretefoundations with concrete slab floors that are overlaid with asphalt floortile. Outside wall construction is of 5/8-inch vertical plywood with built-up tar paper and gravel roofs. The carports are covered with asbestosshake siding for fire retardation. Sizes and design of the units are asfollows:

Number Number ofof Unit S Bedrooms

three 1,384 sq. ft. threefive 1,188 sq. ft. threefour 1,090 sq. ft. twofour 1,688 sq. ft. threetwelve 1,484 sq. ft. three

The housing units are heated with fuel oil-generated forced hot air. Eachhouse has an AST for fuel oil. The fuel passes through undergroundpiping which connects into the houses.

Youngs Lake was originally developed to provide housing for supportstaff to the Nike antiairc missile battery s"ng the Seattle area. TheNike m i site waS iockid p ntely five miles from Youngs Lake.The Youngi Lake' - rt Was p9 I 1 9 and the housing areawas constructed n 1957-19.- twelve M s le unis (05 through 15and 28) were constructed in 1957. The sixteen Capehart style units (01

7W moI, 3-1 cmPA mum SLasw. O.A 1. 19-

through 04 and 16 through 27) were constructed in 1958. Prior topurchase by the government, the property was privately held andundeveloped.

The Nike missile battery operated from approximately 1954 until 1973, atwhich time the U.S. Army Defense Command Mission in the Puget Soundarea was deactivated. Youngs Lake then served as housing for active-dutypersonnel from all branches of the military. These quarters are nowoperated and occupied by the U.S. Coast Guard, which has occupied theproperty since spring 1991 under the terms of a lease with the Army. Theleasing agreement runs through June 1995.

There is no historical evidence that activities at the housing area wereconnected in any way to operations at the Nike missile battery. Thehousing area operated independently of the Nike battery with respect towater, sewer, and electrical utilities. No documentation or other evidence(physical or anecdotal) exists to indicate that the housing property underinvestigation ever received or managed waste of any kind from the Nikebattery or other military or civilian operations. No industrial activitieshave occurred at the housing area.

Electric service for the housing units is furnished by the Renton PublicUtility District (PUD), which also owns and maintains the three electricaltransformers located on the property. Water and sanitary sewage facilitieshave been provided by the town of Renton, Washington since 1967. Priorto that time, the units used individual septic tanks for sewage. No detailson the abandonment of those septic systems were identified during thesite visit. No records were available for review through USACE.However, there is no reason to believe that these tanks represent apotential source of environmental contamination. Under CERFAguidelines, discharge to a sanitary sewage system or septic tank does notrepresent a storage or release of material. Refuse pickup is furnished by aprivate contractor.

3.2 CHANGES TO REAL PROPERTY ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSSINLCE ENHANCED PA INVSTIGATION

Since the November 1989 Enhanced Preliminary Assessment Report, all 28of the 500-gallon fuel oil USTs associated with the houses have beenremoved, and replaced with 350-gallon ASTs. Each housing unit has aseparate AST for fuel oil that powers a forced air heating unit. The fuel oilUSTs were removed and replaced with the ASTs in an operation lastingfrom November 1990 to March 1991. i' )

3-2 CU'A YOU M LAl.0. 'O-Ap1 7. 194

During the summer of 1993, tenants at three of the units (10, 11, and 13)reported encountering petroleum fuel odors while digging near theirunits' foundations. It is suspected that some leakage from theunderground piping systems may be occurring. The piping systems usedwith the newer ASTs are those that were installed with the original USTs.

In cooperation with the Coast Guard, USACE has contracted with FossEnvironmental to Investigate the site. According to the Management Planunder review by USACE, the ASTs at the three target units will be shutoff, moved, and flow will be re-established using portable hoses. Soil willbe excavated at the suspected release sites. The soil will be shipped offsitefor appropriate treatment (probably thermal desorption). The piping willbe replaced with new double walled piping. The ASTs will then bereinstated at their original locations. USACE estimates that this action willbe completed by early May 1994.

3-3 C iVUiN=w U p7.z M

4.* INVESTIGATION RESULTS

This section describes the results of the CERFA investigation byidentifying areas of environmental concern, both those previouslyidentified in prior investigations and those uncovered as a result of theCERFA site visit. In addition, Section 4 identifies parcels in accordancewith the parcel definitions contained in Section 1.2.

41 PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED AREAS REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION CAREES)

The size, operating history, and uniformity of development at the YoungsLake Housing Area lead to the designation of the entire 9.42-acre propertyas a CERFA Disqualified Parcel. The environmental concerns at the siteare described below in the discussion of the CERFA Disqualified Parcel.The appropriate CERFA identifiers describing the basis for classificationare also listed.

1. Entire 9.42-Acre Housing Area [Parcel ID-PS/PR(P)/A/L(P)j

Each of the 28 individual housing units has an operating 350-gallon fueloil AST. These AS rs replaced 500-gallon USTs, which were removedbeginning in November 1990. The entire removal/replacement operationlasted until March 1991. The USTs were replaced by USACE as apreventive maintenance measure because of their advanced age(approximately 30 years), not as a result of suspected loss of integrity. TheCoast Guard was not leasing the property at the time of the tankreplacements.

However, during the UST removal operation, petroleum fuel odors fromseveral of the excavations were reported. Soil samples were collected todetermine the presence and extent of contamination. However, USACE,which was responsible for oversight of the tank removal and replacement,was unable to provide any documentation regarding the fate of the tanksor the necessity for subsequent remediation. The contractor responsiblefor the soil sampling, Joseph Darcy Associates, was also unable to provideany documentation and referred all inquiries to USACE, as did federaland state regulatory agencies. A former employee of Joseph DarcyAssociates stated that some soil had been excavated but had noInomation regarding the quantity or disposition of that soil.

A Coast Guard official reported during the site investigation that threeresidents have reported the presence of petroleum fuel odors since the

. .,.

installation of the ASTs in 1990-91. The affected units were Numbers 10,11, and 13. All three reports were filed during the summer of 1993. Theodors were encountered while the residents were excavating soil near thestructures' foundations. USACE confirmed that these reports had beensubmitted and attributes the source of the odors to suspected leaks alongunderground piping joints. When the USTs were removed, the existingunderground piping systems providing the feed into the housing unitswere left in place. Apparently, the subsequent ASTs were connected tothese existing systems rather than to new piping. Further investigationplanned by USACE is described in Section 3.2. For the purposes of theCERFA report, these releases and those reported during the UST removalsare considered unverified. Therefore, the designation "(P)" appears in theparcel label, indicating that releases are "possible", but unverified bysampling data.

Testing for asbestos has been conducted at the housing units. In February1990, three of the units, Numbers 05,11, and 15, were targeted forinvestigation. Conditions at these three units were considered to berepresentative of all units at the site. Samples were collected fromsuspected asbestos-containing materials (ACM), including floor tiles, piperun and pipe fitting insulation, dust in ductwork, and exterior siding,where present.

Sampling results indicated that asbestos was present in all 16 dust samplesand all 16 floor tile and vinyl sheeting samples. It was recomme -led thatno abatement (removal) procedures be implemented other than removalof floor tiles that showed signs of damage. Other suspected ACM, such asspray-applied texture paint and furnace expansion joints, wererecommended for management in place. Additional airborne asbestossampling was also recommended.

Initial indoor and outdoor airborne sampling was conducted in January1993 at units 19 and 24. Samples from unit 19 did not exceed the detectionlimits, which were set below an action level of 0.005 fibers per cubiccentimeter (f/cc) established by the U.S. Army Toxic and HazardousMaterials Agency (USATHAMA), the precursor to USAEC, for acceptableairborne content. One sample from unit 24 showed an unacceptably highreading of 0.021 f/cc. Follow-up sampling at unit 24 in April 1993 did notexceed the detection limit. Therefore, the initial result was considered anaberration and conditions were not considered to pose a threat to humanhealth. No further testing has been conducted.

Testing for indoor radon was conducted at all 28 units in 1989. Noreadings above 4.0 picocuries per liter (pCi/l), the lowest action levelidentified in the Army Radon Program, were found.

4-2 cPA You,,LAn I.iW0.E 7,,19

Basd on the ag of these buildings, which were all constructed in 1957-1958, lead-based pait, which is a CERFA Qualifier, is presumed present.

4.2 ADDITIO AL AREAS IDENTIFIED

No new areas of environmental concern were identified during the sitevisit that would affect the clmasflcation of Youngs Lake Housing Area as asingle CERFA Disqualified Parcel. However, information regarding thepotential for releases from the AS9s installed in 1990-91 was obtainedfrom the Coast Guard and USACE. Information was also obtainedregarding reports of petroleum fuel odors encountered during removal ofthe original USTs at the site. The Coast Guard is investigating this issueand is arranging for cleanup of affected soils at the sites in question. TheCoast Guard is coodinating this removal with USACE and theappropriate State of Washington regulatory officials.

43 ADJACENTISURROUNDING PROPERTIES

The adjacent properties are private residences. The property to the northof the CERFA site is currently under development and is only partiallyoccupied. The properties to the south and west are occupied by olderresidences. The potential for these adjacent sites to affect conditions at thesubject property is low.

4.4 RELATED ENVRONMENTAL, HAZARD, AND SAFETY ISSUES

Military installations frequently contain issues which the U.S. ArmyEnvironmental Center (USAEC) believes fall outside of the provisions ofCERFA. For example, while a release of lead-based paint onto the groundmay be a CERCLA concern, the application of lead-based paint to abuilding surface is generally not. However, lead-based paint applied tobuildings may represent a safety hazard to young children. Similarly,other substances or materials commonsly applied to or found in buildings(for example, radon and asbestos) may not be explicitly regulated underCERCLA, but may require a notice to potential transferees and lessees thatthey exist.

USAEC has sought to balance the statutory requirements of CERFA withthe law's intent to identify uncontaminated property to the public whichcan be expeditiously reused. Notice has been provided for those parcelswhich appear to be uncontaminated under the definition provided inCMRA, but which may contain environmental, hazard, or safety issues.Buildings which contain asbestos-containing materials, lead-based paint,

uuinmlmw~ 4-3 c3LA I.W..Au 1,

or naturally occurring radon fall into this category and are identified as"CERFA Qualified Parcels" in this CERFA report. Parcels which containstored (not in use) equipment containing 50 parts per million (ppm) ormore of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) oil, low level radionuclide-containing equipment such as dials and weapon site posts, andunexploded ordnance are also designated "CERFA Qualified Parcels".

In those cases, however, where for example, asbestos or PCBs have beendisposed in the environment, the parcel has been identified as "CERFADisqualified". In this example, the designation indicates that a CERCLAhazard may exist at this location.

The presence of environmental, hazard, and safety issues described aboveat the Youngs Lake Housing Area has been documented by previousinvestigations. Asbestos is known to be present and lead-based paint issuspected based on the age of the buildings. Section 4.1 contains a morecomplete discussion of these issues. A listing of buildings containingCERFA Qualifiers may be found in Table 4.4-1.

4.5 CERFA EXCLUDED PROPERTY

None of the property investigated in connection with the Youngs LakeHousing Area is considered Excluded from the CERFA process.

1 Mu Gaot 44 CUPA VOUPOW LARK4O.9-ApW 7, 219

Table 4.4-1Buildings with CERFA Qualifies

Young. Lake Housing AreaRenton, Washington

I A/L(P)2 A/L(P)3 A/L(P)4 A/ISP)5 A/LUP)6 A/IL(P)7 A/LUP)8 A/L(P)9 A/L(P)10 A/SP)11 A/L(P)12 A/L(P)13 A/I(P)14 A/L(P)15 A/SP)16 A/L(P)17 A/LU')18 AI.P)19 A/L(P)20 A/L(P)21 A/L(P)22 A/L(P)23 A/L(P)24 A/SP)25 A/L(P)26 A/SP)27 A/L(P)28 A/L(P)

A Asbestos-containing materialA(P) Asbestos-containing material (possible)L Lead-based PaintL) Lead-based paint (possible)

() R Radon

After conduding tie review of investigation documents, regulatoryrecords, personnel interviews and visual inspections, ERM identifiedparcels on the installation as CERFA Parcel, CERFA Qualified Parcels,CERFA Disqualified Parcels, or CERFA Excluded Parcels in accordancewith the definitions in Se.tion 1.2. The parcels are delineated on a map ofthe BRAC portion of th_, installation using a one-acre square grid forboundary definition.

The Army chose a one-acre grid system to aid in the presentation of datagathered during the CERFA report investigation, and to facilitate use ofthe document by reuse groups and others. The one-acre grid provided aconsistent method to report and locate environmental or other concerns.In the many cases where the concerns are much smaller than one acre, thegrid system simplifies the depiction of the concern. Accordingly, the arealextent of many small areas of concern, such as UST sites, are liberallydepicted in the CERFA report.

Addiionally, the one-acre grid size was chosen as a generallyredevelopable parcel size for either industrial or residential uses.However, the grid does not drive reuse nor restrict it. Reuse decisionsshould be made irrespective of the grid.

The entire one-acre grid square is colored or shaded to indicate theapplicable parcel category based on the history of storage or release forany portion of that square. Parcels are labeled according to a systemoutlined in Section 1.2 of this report to indicate the applicable parcelcategory and the contaminating circumstances. Parcel labels areconnected to the respective parcel boundaries by a line or are locatedwithin the parcel boundaries.

Where CERFA Disqualified Parcels and CERFA Qualified Parcels havecoincided, the overlapped area has been designated CERFA Disqualified.Labels for any such overlapped parcels also indicate the presence of thequalifying hazards. CERFA Excluded Parcels have been excluded fromthis investigation of contaminant locations and therefore have nooverlapping CERFA Disqualified Parcels or CERFA Qualified Parcels.Structures within CERFA Disqualified Parcels that contain qualifyingsafety hazards are designated with the applicable qualifying label, wheremap scale permits this level of detail.

ERM's investigation and subsequent parcelization of the Youngs Lake

Housing Area determined that none of the facility falls within the CERFA

•I n 1i-34 Ci ,,, 5r, 1 CI WA YOUNS LAi.M3X"?.90-Ape 7. IM9

Parcel category. None of the property is categorized as CERFA QualifiedParcels. The entire 9.42 acres constitute the CERFA Disqualified portion ofthe site. None of the property is designated CERFA Excluded.

In determining the applicable parcel categories for the installationproperty, ERM observed the following guidance provided by the USAECfor specific circumstances:

* Buildings constructed prior to 1978 are assumed to contain lead-basedpaint. A similar assumption is made for asbestos in buildingsconstructed prior to 1985.

" Storage of petroleum products, petroleum derivatives and CERCLAregulated hazardous substances will prevent an area from becoming aCERFA Parcel as long as that storage is for one year or greater. Thequantity of substances stored is not relevant to determining theapplicable parcel category. However, if the operation requiring suchsubstances is in the immediate area, and the storage is in limitedquantities for immediate use, the area is not precluded from being aCERFA Parcel.

* Non-leaking equipment containing less than 50 ppm PCBs does notpreclude an area from becoming a CERFA Parcel. Non-leaking, out-of-service equipment with greater than 50 ppm PCBs will place anarea in the CERFA Qualified Parcel category. An area is designatedCERFA Disqualified if there is a known release containing greaterthan 50 ppm PCBs.

* Areas where there are transport systems or process equipment whichhandle hazardous material or petroleum products and upon whichthere have been no release, storage, or disposal are categorized asCERFA Parcels.

" Ordnance disposal locations are designated CERFA Disqualified.This does not include ordnance impact areas which are designatedCERFA Qualified Parcels.

* Routine pesticide and herbicide application in accordance withmanufacturer's directions and chlorofluorocarbons and halon inoperational systems do not preclude an area from becoming a CERFAParcel.

* Coal storage piles and railroad tracks do not be themselves precludean area from becoming a CERFA Parcel.

5.1 CERFA CATEGORY AND DESIGNATION MAP

Table 5.1-1 and Figure 5.1-1 identify the breakdown of the Youngs Lakeproperty according to the criteria for parcel identification under CERFA.

n~~~muaow ~~~5-2 CP VN3~l~O..p?

gJt It

Ch C. c j I t

Ubo

-atA

5.2 CERFA TRACT MAP

The property boundaries and all property transfers including priorownership information is shown in Figure 5.2-1.

5.3 CERFA PARCEL DESIGNATORS

Figure 5.3-1 summarizes the breakdown of the Youngs Lake propertyaccording to the criteria for parcel identification under CERFA.

"MMA" 5-3 CaRFA',URSm.W.AP, 1,W

-t

N

....... ...... ....... ......... .................. .. ..................

.... ........

6 ........................................

S.E. 188TH STREET

.................................... ........... ...........................

.... ..... .... .... ... . ............... ......

-A..........

S.E. I BOTH STREET

ACR ONE ACRE GRID SQUAREDINi COORDINATE LOCATION: 5,6

..... ........... _.

I W-S/PR(P)/A/L(P)-

. . .... .... ....... ............... ...

..... ............. .......... .......... ... .......... ..... ..........

-- ---------- ...... ...

ge

II

°.°°°..... . °°.... .... ° ° ° °

.. EGEND

CERFA DI:

CERFA Q(

CERFA E>

1CERFA PI

PARCELL

PARCEL C

PARCEL C.............. . PARCEL ?

ON DRAI

D=CQ =CE CP C

DISQUALfPS =

PR =IS =HR =

flUAUIFE0

A=ANL = LE

P =PR = RX =URD = R

(P) POSSIBLE

LEGEND:.

- CERFA DISQUALIFIED

LIFIEC [ CERFA QUALIFIED

IED r+ CERFA EXCLUDED

)ED CERFA PARCEL

PACELLAfEL

- N-- PARCEL DESIGNATION

NAT PARCEL CATEGORYPARCEL NUMBER AS NOTED

;ORY ON DRAWING AND TABLEER ASAND

PARCEL CATEGO

ORY D = CERFA DISQUALIFIED PARCEL

Q = CERFA QUALIFIED PARCELDISOC E = CERFA EXCLUDED PARCELQUAL P = CERFA PARCELEXCLPARC

DISQUALIFIED DESIGNATIONS

PS = PETROLEUM STORAGEPR = PETROLEUM RELEASE/DISPOSAL

DLEU HS = HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGEOLEUl HR = HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RELEASE/DISPOSALRDOURDOUE

QUALIFIED DESIGNATIONS

A = ASBESTOS

OS L = LEAD-BASED PAINTASED P = PCBS (POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS)POLY( R = RADON

X = UXO (UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE)

JNEXP RD = RADIONUCLIDE

UCLID

(P) POSSIBLE DISQUALIFIER/QUALIFIERJAUFA

/

NO. DATE APPR. REVISION

NO DAT -PR -EVS-O

11PA ID-PS/PRP)/A/L(P

z

li

*12 3 4

S.E. IS.E. 192ND STREET

'E45I10N

Youngs Lake Housing Area

Renton IN

Environmental Resources Management, Inc.Exton, Prc.nr./I,rnIra 19341 (215) 524-350(0

Ld

zLi

LJ

...... 4 5

CHECKED DATE

sing Area DESIGN ENGINEER

PROJECT ENGINEER

Was gon ________

ilngt PROJECT MANAGER

lsment, Inc. ........ ____ _______

H ,APPROVED DRAWN . Bn/

%±wAPPROVED SCALEiawf%~ la 80'

CERFA PARCEL

'-L11.PARCEL DESIGNATIONPARCEL CATEGORY

.............. PARCEL NUMBER AS NOTON DRAWING AND TABLE

PARCEL CATEGOR

D = CERFA DISQUALIFQ = CERFA QUALIFIEDE = CERFA EXCLUDEDP = CERFA PARCEL

DISQUALIFIED DESIGNATIQI

PS - PETROLEUM ST(PR - PETROLEUM REIHS = KZ2RDOUS MAHR =HAZARDOUS MA

QUALIFIED DESIGNATIONS

A =ASBESTOS

L=LEAD-BASED PAR~P = PCBS (POLYCHLCR = RADONX = UXO (UNEXPLODERD = RADIONUCLIDE

(P) POSSIBLE DISQUALIFIER/C

S NON-LEAKING UIST OR A'(FORMER OR ACTIVE)

............ LEAKING UIST OR AST_________________________________________(FORMER OR ACTIVE)

W BUILDING WITH CERFA Q(IN A DISQUALIFIED PAF

80 40 0

Scale in Fef

_<ED DATE

C'N ENGINEER

IFA ____EGIEE CERFA Category and Designation Map

)::CT MANAGER

: ()VED DRAWN M.K. Bod/M DATE 10.5.3/0406.94 jCLIENT APPROVAL

k0VED SCALE IW.O No. ISSUED FO DATE-1" 80' P377.1A0-

CERFA PARCEL

q L - PARCEL DESIGNATIONPARCEL CATEGORYPARCEL NUMBER AS NOTED

ON DRAWING AND TABLE

PARCEL CATEGOT

'ARCi D = CERFA DISQUAUFIED PARCELCEL- 0 = CERFA QUALIFIED PARCELCE_ E = CERFA EXCLUDED PARCEL

P = CERFA PARCEL

DISQUALIFIED DESIGNATIONS

PS - PETROLEUM STORAGEPR = PETROLEUM RELEASE/DISPOSAL

kLS S HS = HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGELS - HR = HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RELEASE/DISPOSAL

QUALIFIED DESIGNATIONS

A = ASBESTOSL = LEAD-BASED PAINT

TED i P = PCBS (POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS)R = RADON

,DNA X = UXO (UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE)RD = RADIONUCLIDE

(P) POSSIBLE DISQUALIFIER/QUALIFIER

S NON-LEAKING UST OR AST(FORMER OR ACTIVE)

+ LEAKING UST OR ASTT_ (FORMER OR ACTIVE)

BUILDING WITH CERFA QUALIFIER(S)

IN A DISQUALIFIED PARCEL

80 40 0 80 160

Scale in Feet

:;- ,1ING NO.

CERFA Category and Designation Map Figure 5.1-1

PE 4. NO.

' DATE CLIENT APPROVAL

M.K. Bond/CMP 10.25.93/04.06.94

WO. No. ISSUED FOP DATE -ET1" = W.O80'o.PM307.70.01-A301-111

Youngs Loke Housing Area Previous Owners

UTS lUW of PVWiS O.W Dw of TM ,_ A-

A= = :32- ft n 0 *pm 1972 3.4Q

I ,

III

S.E. 192nd Street

THE MA aW

*1I

FIgWe 5.2-1Trat Map

S.E. I8th Street aio m, L ak e hov*Ae

Rened -Io

I)I~

7 1 - roertyBoundary

(D Tract Identifier

200 100 0 200

Scale in Fet

PNSO7.1.1/1OJ.U-M/04.1.4-MfTIA2O1 -1

S.E. 192nd Street

Tm am am

- Fgue 5.3-1CERFA Parcel Designation.

Young Lake Housin AreaS.E. 188th Strt Ronton, Wshigon

Lj CERFA DISQUALIFIEDU) CERFA QUALIFIED

CERFA EXCLUDED

[Z] CERFA PARCEL

200 100 0 200

scal. in FeetN

0STATE OF WASHINGTON

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGYNorthwest Regional 0O(11c, 315 - 160th Ave &E. * BRevue, Washington 9800-452 (2) 649-7000

March 10, 1994

a ttn: tF IN-AEC-BCPMr. Joseph A. RicciDepartment of the ArmyU.S. Army Environmental Center, Base Closure DivisionAberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5401

Dear Mr. Ricci:

Thank you for your comments regarding my letter responding to thedraft Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA)Report for the Youngs Lake Housing Area, Renton, Washington.

Your comments during our telephone conversation in early March,1994, have clarified the situation regarding the release of ahazardous substance that has occurred at the Youngs Lake HousingArea. The release is from one or more of the former undergroundheating fuel storage tanks associated with the housing units.This area is referred to as the CERFA Disqualified Parcel. It isEcology's understanding that these tanks have been removed, andsoil testing and cleanup information is forthcoming.

Therefore, I would like to state my concurrence with the Young'sLake Housing Area draft CERFA Report.

Please call me at (206) 649-7202 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

o mph M. Hickeys Unit Supervisor

Toxics Cleanup Program

JH:jh