854 Adenoma Detection Rates Vary Greatly Between Gastroenterology Fellows
Transcript of 854 Adenoma Detection Rates Vary Greatly Between Gastroenterology Fellows
positive findings only with PillCam SB2® and five only with Capsovision®.Concordance between both capsule exmination were good with k�0.63 inanalysable patients and k�0.6 in intention to treat (including failures). Diagnosticyield was similar for both capsules in a per-patient analysis, with 29/73 positivefor Capsovision versus 29/73 for PillCamSB2 (p�0.79). In a per-lesion analysis,Capsovision® capsule significantly improved the number of P1/P2 lesionsdetected; 107 versus 85 lesions, despite this difference was essentially based on 2patient with numerous angiectasias identified by Capsovision® (p�0.01).Reading time was slightly longer for Capsovision® with a mean of 32.0 minversus 26.2 with PillCam SB2®. Conclusion : This study shows for the first timecomparable efficiency of the Capsovision® and PilCam SB2® capsule systemregarding the diagnostic yield and image quality. Capsovision® gave a 37.0%positive diagnostic rate versus 38.3% for the PillCam SB2® without significantdifference in per patient analysis. Circumferential viewing may improveangiectasia viewing.
852Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold SNAREPolypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for SmallColorectal Polyps in Patients Receiving Anticoagulation TherapyAkira Horiuchi*1, Yoshiko Nakayama1,2
1Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, Komagane,Japan; 2Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University Hospital,Matsumoto, JapanBackground: The current practice guidelines for colonoscopy in patientsrequiring long-term anticoagulation consider polypectomy a high-risk procedureand recommend anticoagulation be temporarily discontinued. However, thebleeding risk after cold snare polypectomy in anticoagulated patients is notknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk ofpostpolypectomy bleeding after removal of small polyps by cold snaretransection without electrocautery in anticoagulated patients. Method:Anticoagulated patients with colorectal polyps up to 10 mm in diameter wererandomized to polypectomy to cold snare technique (Cold group) orconventional polypectomy (Conventional group). The two techniques wereperformed without discontinuation of warfarin. Submucosal injection of salinesolution before the removal and prophylactic clipping after the removal were notroutinely performed, irrespective of the type of polypectomy. The primaryoutcome measure was immediate bleeding during the procedure or delayedbleeding within two weeks after polypectomy requiring endoscopic intervention.Secondary outcome measure was the complete retrieval rate of colorectal polypsbased on the pathological examination. Results: 70 patients were randomized:Cold group, N�35 (78 polyps) and Conventional group, N�35 (81 polyps). Thepatients’ demographic characteristics including international normalized ratio(INR), and the number, size, and shape of polyps removed were similar betweenthe two techniques. Procedure time was significantly shorter with coldpolypectomy vs. conventional polypectomy (16 min vs. 26 min, P�0.0001).Complete polyp retrieval rates were identical [94% (73/78) vs. 93% (75/81)].Immediate bleeding during the procedure was more common with conventionalpolypectomy [23%(8/35)] compared with cold polypectomy [5.7% (2/35)](P�0.04). No delayed bleeding occurred in cold group whereas 5 patients (14%)required endoscopic hemostasis in conventional group (P�0.02). Nothromboembolic events were observed in either group. Conclusion: No delayedbleeding requiring hemostasis occurred after cold snare polypectomy despitecontinuation of anticoagulants suggesting that cold snare polypectomy is thepreferred method for removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulatedpatients.
853Leaving Distal Colorectal Polyps in Place Can Be Achieved WithHigh Accuracy Using High-Definition Endoscopy With VirtualChromoendoscopyHelmut Neumann*1, Michael Vieth2, Claudia GüNther1, Raja Atreya1,JüRgen Siebler1, Markus F. Neurath1
1Department of Medicine 1, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,Erlangen, Germany; 2Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth,Bayreuth, GermanyObjectives: The ASGE PIVI statement proposed that a new technology shouldprovide a negative predictive value (NPV) �90% for adenomatous polyphistology to leave distal diminutive colorectal polyps in place without resection.To our knowledge no prior prospective study has yet evaluated the feasibility ofvirtual chromoendoscopy based, real-time endoscopic prediction of polyphistology for the specific endpoint of leaving distal hyperplastic polyps in place.Aims: Prospective assessment of real-time prediction of diminutive (� 5mm)distal colorectal polyps by using virtual chromoendoscopy (i-scan). Material &Methods: 224 consecutive patients undergoing screening or surveillancecolonoscopy were included. 121 distal colorectal polyps from 77 patients were
evaluated in real-time by using high-definition endoscopy and i-scan. Beforeresection, the endoscopist described each polyp according to size, shape andsurface characteristics (pit and vascular pattern, color, depression) and histologywas predicted with a level of confidence (high or low). Results: The histologywas predicted with high-confidence in 91.7% of polyps. The overall accuracy foradenomatous polyp histology was 90.1% with a sensitivity, specificity, positiveand negative predictive value of 91.5%, 88.7%, 88.5%, and 91.7%, respectively.When the prediction was made with high-confidence, the accuracy was 96.4%.Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were 98.2%, 94.6%,94.7%, and 98.2%, respectively. Conclusion: High-definition endoscopy incombination with virtual chromoendoscopy allows real-time prediction ofcolorectal polyp histology and is accurate enough to leave distal colorectalpolyps in place without resection. This approach has therefore the potential toreduce costs and risks associated with the redundant removal of diminutivecolorectal polyps.
854Adenoma Detection Rates Vary Greatly BetweenGastroenterology FellowsYark Hazewinkel*, Robert B. Klanderman, Deborah Van Den Buijs,Paul Fockens, Evelien DekkerGastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center,Amsterdam, NetherlandsBackground: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an independent predictor ofinterval cancer and varies between colonoscopists. This variability within theADR might already start during endoscopical training. Although Dutch trainingguidelines prescribe 100 fully supervised procedures, in the past at ourinstitution, fellows inspected the colon unsupervised after approximately theirfirst 50 procedures. This setting enabled us to measure ADR levels of startingcolonoscopists. Aim: To monitor ADRs of fellows withdrawing autonomouslyduring their entire fellowship in a retrospective setting. Methods: Colonoscopiesperformed by 7 fellows between May 2004 and Feb 2012 were reviewed. Toidentify a learning curve, consecutive procedures were stratified into a “trainingset” (first 140 procedures) and ”post-training set” (141 till end of fellowship). ForADR analysis, emergency procedures as well as patients with IBD, polyposis anda positive faecal blood test were excluded. These procedures, however, didcount as gained experience in the training set. Individual ADRs were comparedwith the highest-level detector, adjusted for patient’s age, gender and indication.Regression analysis was used to determine the association of training ADRs onthe detection of advanced neoplasia (� 1 cm, high grade dysplasia, villousstructure or CRC) during the remaining fellowship. Results: A total of 3252colonoscopies were performed by 7 fellows. The number of proceduresperformed per fellow ranged from 389 to 612. After exclusion, data of 2050procedures could be used for ADR analysis. In this cohort (mean age 59 yrsSD � 15, 48% male) the overall ADR was 23% whereas individual ADRs rangedfrom 15% to 32%. Compared with the highest level detector, the odds fordetecting � 1 adenoma for individual fellows ranged from 0.73 to 0.29. None ofthe 7 individual ADRs increased significantly after the first 140 procedures.Fellows with a training ADR �20% (n�4) detected significantly more advancedneoplasms during the remaining course of their fellowship compared to fellowswith a training ADR �20% (OR 1.88 95% CI 1.33-2.66). Conclusion: Thedetection of adenomas varies greatly between fellows. We observed no increasein ADR levels after the first 140 colonoscopies, suggesting that adequatewithdrawal technique is specifically learned during this novice-period. Thesignificance of this finding is underlined by the observation that fellows with anADR �20%, during this period, go on to detect more advanced neoplasmsduring the remaining course of their fellowship. In an effort to improve detectionperformance it seems therefore advisable to intensify training during thebeginning of a fellowship.
855Racial Differences in Outcome of Colonoscopy in Young Adults(<50 Years): Sub-Analysis From Colonoscopy Outcome inMinority Population (Comp) RegistryKinesh Changela, Shashideep Singhal, Manhal Olaywi*,Deepanshu Jain, Devin Lane, Sushil Duddempudi, Mojdeh Momeni,Mahesh Krishnaiah, Sury AnandGastorenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NYBackground: Identification and removal of colonic adenomas is the corner stoneof our colorectal cancer prevention program. There has been a concern of earlierdevelopment of colonic adenomas in adults � 50 years of age especially in highrisk ethnic groups. There are very limited studies done to determine the yield ofcolonoscopy in young minority adults. Methods: The study cohort was selectedfrom from COMP registry at our teaching urban community hospital. Patientswith age � 50 years were included in the study. The demographic, endoscopicfindings and pathological reports study group were analyzed to determine theyield colonic adenomas during colonoscopy. Results: Out of 4015 colonoscopies
Abstracts
www.giejournal.org Volume 77, No. 5S : 2013 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY AB174