8. Geiss TOTAL - Late Charge in the K5 Area

download 8. Geiss TOTAL - Late Charge in the K5 Area

of 25

description

Presentation by TOTAL on the K5 block offshore the Netherlands

Transcript of 8. Geiss TOTAL - Late Charge in the K5 Area

  • 1 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Late Charge problems in the K5 area

    1

    Bernard GeissTEP Nederland, 5th June 2008TNO/EBN Workshop Utrecht

  • 2 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Agenda

    Regional context

    K5-13 results and Post Mortem

    Structural Setting K4-K5 area

    Conclusions

  • 3 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    SW NE

    Top ChalkBase ChalkTop SaltTop RotliegendesHercynian UnconformityTop Westphalian A

    Chalk

    Salt

    5 km

    Chalk

    Salt

    Stratigraphic Column and HC Play in core area

    D2

    R

    HU

    E

    D1

    C2

    R

    HU

    E

    D1

    C2

    TWA

    D4

    DT

    K5-2

  • 4 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    K5-1

    K5-12

    K5-2

    K5-5

    K5-6

    K5-4

    K5-3

    K5-7

    K5-8

    K5-9

    K5-11

    K4-8

    K5-13

    K6-8

    K6-1

    K6-6

    K6-5

    K6-4K6-2

    K6-3

    K6-7

    K6-9

    K3-2

    K5-F2 K6-11

    K6-10

    100%1111K6

    100%1212K5

    50%12K3

    100%22K2

    Exploration wells and success rate

    10 km

  • 5 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Westphalian B Coal Measures

    K2-2K2-1 K5-11E17-1E17-2E16-1

    Miocene Unconf.

    Top Chalk

    Top SaltBase Chalk

    Top RotliegendesHU

    Top Westph. A

    Top Westph. B

    NE SW

    T

    W

    T

    1 -

    3 -GDT GDT

    K5-13

    WUT

    Regional seismic line

    K5bK5-13

    K2

    E16/17

    K5-11

  • 6 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Random tie line K5bTop ChalkBase ChalkTop SaltTop RotliegendesHUTop Westphalian A

    K5-13K5-12K1-5NW ESE

    RHU

    Top Salt

    Fairly similar context with K5-12

    m

    Top West A

  • 7 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Well correlation flattened at MFS2K5-12 K5-13

    RSWC

    Pressure tests

    10 m

    Sand box concept confirmed

    Seq. 212.3 m

    39m Seq. 3-3856 mss

    -3841 mss

    -3834 mss

    Seq. 1

    Additional sands not predicted

  • 8 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Seismic Interpretation: K5b Top Westphalian B Depth Structure

    Outline of erosion at HU

    Westphalian ABC

    S N

    HU

    K5-13K5-12

  • 9 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Fluvial to aeolian depositional processes: Back stepping of LS system (F16-3) The main NE-SW wrench trend possibly

    constrains fluvial sediment supply K6 Block located within the main fluvial belt

    axe with an impact on the reservoir properties

    L7-2K4-9

    K5-12 K1-5

    K4-12

    L4-2

    K5-9

    L1.7

    F16-3

    E-18

    K4-K5 : Aeolian dominated, Sand box conceptStrong impact of HU geometry

    West.D

    West. Upper CWest. Lower CWest. B

    West. A

    Stephanian

    K6-10

    Regional Depositional environment sketch - confirmed

    Sand deposits on Westphalian B subcrop

    K5-13

    N

  • 10 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    K5-13: What did go wrong?

    Intra Westph. B coalbed

    Base Chalk

    Top Salt

    Zechstein CarbonatesTop Rotliegend

    Hercynian Unconformity

    2.5 km

    K5-13

    K5-13

    Top Rotliegend Depth Structure Map

    SENW

    Reservoir

    Juxtaposition?

    Low saturations of gas in fluid inclusions

  • 11 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    The dilemma to explain the failure of K5-13 Leakage ? Gas found in fluid inclusion but only low

    saturations More sands drilled. Sand juxtaposition

    across faults still unlikely but possible If such a juxtaposition is present then

    the spill point is below the well. However no attic gas found.

    Leakage through faults very unlikely as the surrounding formations are supposed to be highly sealing: Silverpit shales laterally and vertically, Zechstein evaporites as ultimate vertical seal.

    Lack of HC Charge ? Gas in fluid inclusions where has it

    gone? Never observed in K4-K5 area Westphalian SR within the K5-13 horst

    block not mature enough to expellsufficient amounts of gas

    Presence of N45 oriented faults, separating kitchen area from K5-13 panel

    Shales

    Evaporites

    Reservoir

    What is so peculiar about these N45 oriented faults?

  • 12 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Fault pattern K4/K5 area on NW-SE gradient map

    K5-13

    Gradient at Top Rotliegendes

  • 13 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    K4-K5 Structural Pattern at Top RotliegendesBlack = Normal faultsRed = Inverted faultsWhite = Transfer Faults

    N40

    N150

    Close-up areaTop Rotliegendes Depth Structure and Dip

  • 14 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    K4-K5 Close-Up Structural Pattern at Top Rotliegendes

    N40

    N150

    K4-A4

    K4-7

    K5-A2

    K5-A4

    K5-A1

    K8-12

    K5-4

    K5-10

    K4-A3 Black = Normal faultsRed = Inverted faultsWhite = Transfer Faults

    Top Rotliegendes Depth Structure and Dip

    Xline 1875

  • 15 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Subtle Transfer faults on Xline 1875

    K5-A1

    K5-A2

    K5-A4

    2.5 km (1:4)

    K8-12

    K5-4

    200 m

    NW SE

    Hercynian Unconformity

    Top Salt

    Top Rotliegend

    Near Top Westphalian B

    K5-A1 K5-A4K5-A2 K5-4

    Faults with hardly any throw within the Rotliegendes

    Reservoirjuxtapositioning

  • 16 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    K5A Pressure History on Well correlationK5K5--A4A4 K5K5--44K5K5--A1 (ex. K5A1 (ex. K5--3)3)K5K5--A2A2

    HU

    Seq. 6

    Seq. 3-4

    Seq. 6

    Seq. 3-4

    1999 236 bar 198 bar 401 bar2006 126 bar 96 bar 221 bar

    1988 409 bar 409 bar Not yet drilled 409 barBHP Lower Slochteren Reservoir Sequences 3-4

    1994 Production start-up K5-A1 & A2 Not yet drilled 409 bar

    K5-A1

    K5-A2

    K5-A4

    K5-4

    Transfer Fault Transfer Fault

  • 17 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Small scale: Graben alike structures along transfer faults

    The observed vertical throws are little but may be underestimated as they are often resembling conjugate fault systems.

    When evaluating juxtaposition and SGR, we are constantly hurdling against the lack of vertical resolution. Therefore deterministic evaluations are uncertain.

    Further uncertainties are the horizontal throw and fault cementation

    More throw

  • 18 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Large scale: Separation of K5-13 from kitchen by

    ~ 10 km

    K5-13

    N

    Producing Areas (sketched) andno expulsion from SR expected

    Kitchen Areas

    Kitchen Areas

  • 19 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    NW-SE Striking Normal and Inverted Faults

    Top ChalkBase ChalkTop SaltTop RotliegendesHUTop Westphalian BTop Westphalian A

    2.5 km

    500 m

    SWNE

    K5-12

    Strong throws on the NW-SE (N120-150) faults no reservoir juxtapositionDecoupling between Pre- and Post salt. Salt cored buckle folds above Rotliegend Highs

  • 20 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Top Rotliegendes Depth MapBase Chalk Depth MapTop Chalk Depth Map

    Late Cretaceous to Tertiary Inversion

    Late Cretaceous Tertiary inversion axis around N45

  • 21 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Present day maximum horizontal stress oriented N135

    The N135 direction of the present day maximum stress is also confirmed by borehole induced fracturing.

    The N45 transfer faults are therefore very likely to be closed

    Total data

  • 22 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Leveille et al. 1997Sealing N40 trending faults

    SGR predicts clay smear is not sealing

    Leveille argues for cementation, on the basis of cemented fractures from cores

  • 23 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Conclusions

    Confirmation of the geological model for sand deposits above Westphalian B subcrop (Sand box concept)

    Fluid inclusions can not conclude on the reason of the failure

    Migration from northern kitchen may be deflected by closed N45 faults

    These transfer faults have hardly any vertical throw but may form significant barriers to fluid flow. This is not fully understood today

    Beware of certainties even in a mature area

  • 24 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    3D View of K5b area

    K5-13

    The N45 faults appear as distinct corridors on this view. They are not just a thin lineament but a graben system probably composed of helicoidal en echelon faults.

  • 25 - Late charge problems in the K5 area

    Throw variation along fault