773 Capacity Analysis Report
5
Capacity Planning Capacity Analysis Report version 4.3 Page 1 Date Revised: 8-Oct-10 Date Printed:08/23/2022 A. New Model Required OEE - DİNAMİK YAY 2014 B460 08455-100 (773) A1) Supplier & Part Information A2) Capacity Requirements APW MPW A3) Key Contacts DİNAMİK YAY Supplier Name B460 Program Code <PA> Requirements 2350 3000 Name Phone # Email DEMİRKAPI/EYÜP/İSTANBUL Location/Site Code 2014 Model Year STA Site Engineer B460 Part Name urce of Capacity Requirements Other (specify in Notes at bottom left Supplier Lead TAYFUN TURGAÇ 212 4933374 [email protected] 08455-100 (773) Part Number 11-Sep-13 Date of Study Ford Buyer Capacity Requirements Supplier to demonstrate APW of 2350 parts per week operating no more than 5 days per week Supplier to demonstrate MPW of 3000 parts per week operating no more than 6 days per week A4) Planned Departmental Operating Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 Process 5 Process 6 Process 7 Process 8 Pattern & Net Available Time APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan A Process description (in value stream order) forming & heat treatment B Days / Week 5.5 7 C Shifts / Day 2 2 D Total Hours / Shift 8 8 E 0 0 F Allocation Percent (enter 100 for dedicated) 6.2% 6.2% G 5.46 6.94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - G1 90 G2 0.13 A5) Required Good Parts / Week APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan H Percent of parts scrapped 0.1% J 2350 3000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Avg. Weekly Max Weekly 2352 3002 A6) Required OEE APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan K Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle) 6.68 6.68 L # of Tools or Machines in parallel 1 1 M 1 1 N Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] 6.68 6.68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P 2940 3742 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q 79.9% 80.2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R 0.0% S YES YES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 16.6% 17.1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Enter any other assumptions for clarification A7) Shared Process - Total Allocation Plan forming & heat treatment - - - - - - - U B. Supplier Demonstrated OEE - Surrogate Historical Performance B1) Surrogate Performance (from Surrogate OEE Summary) Process Description forming & heat treatment - - - - - - - V Supplier Name Dinamik Yay W Supplier Location İstanbul X Site Code for Surrogate Process Y Z Average Surrogate OEE 95.2% - - - - - - - 2798 3562 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / Week Process Description forming & heat treatment APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result OK OK Predicted Good Parts / Week APW MPW 2976 3790 NOTES SUPPLIER OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPROVAL FOR STA USE Version 4.3 Authorized Representative Name / Title Email Site Engineer STA LL6 Supervisor © 2010 Ford Motor Company Signature Date Phone Number Signature/Date Signature/Date Contractual Planned Downtime - lunch, breaks, etc. (minutes/shift) Net Available Time (hours / week) [B*C*(D-(E/60))*F] Planned Minutes per Changeover (into this part #) Planned Changeover Frequency / Week (into this part #) Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process [Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts / Required Incoming Parts for forming & heat treatment # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N] Required OEE [J / P] Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process) Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + % Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses {P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P Enter Total % Allocation from "Shared - Loading Plan" Tab P221) List reference Surrogate Process (~Stamping Enter any other assumptions for clarification (Part Number, Annual Volume, Operating Pattern, etc.) B2) Process Specific Weekly Part Estimate [P * Z] Demonstrated OEE > Required OEE? (Is Z > Q?) forming & heat treatment 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 79.9% 80.2% 95.2% Req'd OEE at APW Req'd OEE at MPW Surrogate Demonstrated OEE OEE % Approved Rejected ure
-
Upload
musa-guersoy -
Category
Documents
-
view
118 -
download
1
Transcript of 773 Capacity Analysis Report
Capacity Planning
Capacity Analysis Report version 4.3 Page 1 Date Revised: 8-Oct-10Date Printed:04/20/2023
A. New Model Required OEE - DİNAMİK YAY 2014 B460 08455-100 (773)A1) Supplier & Part Information A2) Capacity Requirements APW MPW A3) Key Contacts
DİNAMİK YAY Supplier Name B460 Program Code <PA> Requirements 2350 3000 Name Phone # EmailDEMİRKAPI/EYÜP/İSTANBUL Location/Site Code 2014 Model Year STA Site EngineerB460 Part Name Source of Capacity Requirements Other (specify in Notes at bottom left) Supplier Lead TAYFUN TURGAÇ 212 4933374 [email protected] (773) Part Number 11-Sep-13 Date of Study Ford Buyer
Capacity Requirements Supplier to demonstrate APW of 2350 parts per week operating no more than 5 days per weekSupplier to demonstrate MPW of 3000 parts per week operating no more than 6 days per week
A4) Planned Departmental Operating Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 Process 5 Process 6 Process 7 Process 8
Pattern & Net Available Time APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
A Process description (in value stream order) forming & heat treatment
B Days / Week 5.5 7
C Shifts / Day 2 2
D Total Hours / Shift 8 8
E 0 0
F Allocation Percent (enter 100 for dedicated) 6.2% 6.2%
G Net Available Time (hours / week) [B*C*(D-(E/60))*F] 5.46 6.94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -G1 Planned Minutes per Changeover (into this part #) 90G2 Planned Changeover Frequency / Week (into this part #) 0.13
A5) Required Good Parts / Week APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
H Percent of parts scrapped 0.1%
J 2350 3000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Avg. Weekly Max Weekly
Required Incoming Parts for 2352 3002
A6) Required OEE APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
K Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle) 6.68 6.68
L # of Tools or Machines in parallel 1 1
M # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle 1 1
N Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] 6.68 6.68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N] 2940 3742 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q 79.9% 80.2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process) 0.0%
SYES YES - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
T16.6% 17.1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Enter any other assumptions for clarification
A7) Shared Process - Total Allocation Plan forming & heat treatment - - - - - - -
U Enter Total % Allocation from "Shared - Loading Plan" Tab
B. Supplier Demonstrated OEE - Surrogate Historical PerformanceB1) Surrogate Performance (from Surrogate OEE Summary)
Process Description forming & heat treatment - - - - - - -
V Supplier Name Dinamik Yay
W Supplier Location İstanbul
X Site Code for Surrogate ProcessY
Z Average Surrogate OEE 95.2% - - - - - - -
2798 3562 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / WeekProcess Description forming & heat treatment
APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result
OK OK
Predicted Good Parts / Week
APW MPW
2976 3790
NOTES
SUPPLIER OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPROVAL FOR STA USEVersion 4.3
Authorized Representative Name / Title Email Site Engineer STA LL6 Supervisor
© 2010 Ford Motor CompanySignature Date Phone Number Signature/Date Signature/Date
Contractual Planned Downtime - lunch, breaks, etc.(minutes/shift)
Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process[Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts /
forming & heat treatment
Required OEE [J / P]
Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N) <= P]
% Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses {P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P
Surrogate Customer & Program Reference (~Ford P221)List reference Surrogate Process (~Stamping Press #12)
Enter any other assumptions for clarification (Part Number, Annual Volume, Operating Pattern, etc.)
B2) Process Specific Weekly Part Estimate [P * Z]
Demonstrated OEE > Required OEE? (Is Z > Q?)
forming & heat treatment0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
79.9% 80.2%
95.2%
Req'd OEE at APW Req'd OEE at MPW Surrogate Demonstrated OEE
OE
E %
Approved
Rejected
Insert Signatu
re Image from file
Q2
Average Production Weekly (APW) is the average weekly quantity of parts specified by Ford to the supplier. The APW is the quantity of parts the supplier needs to be capable of producing to meet the planned long-term "Average" requirement of the supplier's Ford customer plants. Note: Plant weekly requirements vary
S2
Maximum Production Weekly (MPW) is the maximum weekly quantity of parts specified by Ford to the supplier. The MPW is the quantity of parts the supplier needs to be capable of producing to meet the planned short-term (up to 90 days) "Peak" requirement of the supplier's Ford customer plants.
J6
Enter date in "dd-mmm-yy" format, e.g. 12-Jun-10
C18
For shared processes, Allocation % includes changeover time into this part number
G20
Per tool or machine
K20
Per tool or machine
O20
Per tool or machine
S20
Per tool or machine
W20
Per tool or machine
AA20
Per tool or machine
AE20
Per tool or machine
AI20
Per tool or machine
G21
Per tool or machine
K21
Per tool or machine
O21
Per tool or machine
S21
Per tool or machine
W21
Per tool or machine
AA21
Per tool or machine
AE21
Per tool or machine
AI21
Per tool or machine
C32
For processes with multiple operations, use constraint.
C36
Assumes no unplanned breakdowns, no changeovers, and maintenance is done outside of planned production time.
G39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
I39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
K39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
M39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
O39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
Q39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
S39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
U39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
W39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
Y39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AA39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AC39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AE39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AG39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AI39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AK39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
G55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
K55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
O55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
S55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
W55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
AA55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
AE55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
AI55
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
B59
Used to independently evaluate the specific process' potential for producing good parts. This part estimate does not take into account a blocked condition from a downstream process nor a starved condition from an upstream process. This part estimate assumes an unlimited supply of parts entering the process and is simply based on the specific process' Demonstrated OEE. This value does not represent the Overall Process Predicted Good Parts / Week. For that value, refer to the summary section at the bottom of this tab.
B65
These Predicted Good Part / Week APW and MPW values are recorded as PPC (Purchased Part Capacity) in the Ford capacity systems GCP (Vehicle) and MCPV (Powertrain). If any OEE > 100% in this report, the analysis must be corrected prior to entering the PPC values into the Ford system. Contact your STA engineer for assistance. Note: Estimated to be the lowest value in row B5 reduced by planned scrap losses (row H) of successive operations
Phase 0 PPAP (Run @ Rate)
Capacity Analysis Report version 4.3 Page 1 Date Revised: 8-Oct-10Date Printed:04/20/2023
A. New Model Required OEE - DİNAMİK YAY 2014 B460 08455-100 (773) 1 2350 3000 1
A1) Supplier & Part Information A2) Capacity Requirements APW MPW A3) Key ContactsDİNAMİK YAY Supplier Name B460 Program Code <PA> Requirements 2350 3000 Name Phone # EmailDEMİRKAPI/EYÜP/İSTANBUL Location/Site Code 2014 Model Year Revised Requirements STA Site EngineerB460 Part Name Source of Capacity Requirements Supplier Lead TAYFUN TURGAÇ 212 4933374 [email protected] (773) Part Number 11-Sep-13 Date of Study GCP/MCPV Ford Buyer
Capacity Requirements Supplier to demonstrate APW of 2350 parts per week operating no more than 5 days per weekSupplier to demonstrate MPW of 3000 parts per week operating no more than 6 days per week
A4) Planned Departmental Operating Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 Process 5 Process 6 Process 7 Process 8
Pattern & Net Available Time APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
A Process description (in value stream order) forming & heat treatment
B Days / Week 5.5 7C Shifts / Day 2 2D Total Hours / Shift 8 8
E 0 0
F Allocation Percent (enter 100 for dedicated) 6.2% 6.2%
G Net Available Time (hours / week) [B*C*(D-(E/60))*F] 5.46 6.94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -G1 Planned Minutes per Changeover (into this part #) 90G2 Planned Changeover Frequency / Week (into this part #) 0.13
A5) Required Good Parts / Week APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
H Percent of parts scrapped 0.1%
J 2350 3000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Avg. Weekly Max Weekly
Required Incoming Parts for 2352 3002
A6) Required OEE APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
K Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle) 6.68 6.68L # of Tools or Machines in parallel 1 1M # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle 1 1N Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] 6.68 6.68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N] 2940 3742 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q 79.9% 80.2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process) 0.0%
SYES YES - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
T16.6% 17.1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Enter any other assumptions for clarification
A7) Shared Process - Total Allocation Plan forming & heat treatment - - - - - - -
U Enter Total % Allocation from "Shared - Loading Plan" Tab
B. Supplier Demonstrated OEE - Phase 0 PPAP (Run @ Rate)B1) Equipment Availability forming & heat treatment - - - - - - -
V 390
W Planned Downtime - lunches/breaks/mtgs. (minutes) 0X Net Available Time (minutes) [V - W] 390 - - - - - - -
Y Shared Equip Changeover Time ACTUAL (minutes) NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED
Z 14 - - - - - - -
AB Observed Unplanned Downtime (minutes) 0AC Operating Time (minutes) [X - AB] 390 - - - - - - -
AD Equipment Availability [(X - AB) / (X + Z) * 100] 96.6% - - - - - - -
B2) Performance EfficiencyAE Total Parts Run (Good, Scrapped, & Reworked) 3500AF Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (seconds/part) [N or Other] 6.7 - - - - - - -
AG Performance Efficiency (AE * AF / AC) 99.9% - - - - - - -AH
0 - - - - - - -
B3) Quality Rate # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # %
AJ # Parts Scrapped 0 - - - - - - - -AK # Parts Reworked 0 - - - - - - - -
AL Quality Rate [(AE - AJ - AK) / AE] 100.0% - - - - - - -
B4) Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
AM Phase 0 OEE [AD * AG * AL] 96.5% - - - - - - -
2837 3611 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B6) Observed Average Cycle Time (sec/cycle)
C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / WeekProcess Description forming & heat treatment
APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result
OK OK
Predicted Good Parts / Week
APW MPW
2896 3686
NOTES
SUPPLIER OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPROVAL FOR STA USEVersion 4.3
Authorized Representative Name / Title Email Site Engineer STA LL6 Supervisor
A. Tayfun Turgaç 6/13/2013 0212 493 33 74 © 2010 Ford Motor CompanySignature Date Phone Number Signature/Date Signature/Date
Select for Analysis
Contractual Planned Downtime - lunch, breaks, etc.(minutes/shift)
Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process[Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts /
forming & heat treatment
Required OEE [J / P]
Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N) <= P]
% Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses {P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P
Total Available Time (ACTUAL changeover NOT included for Shared) (minutes)
Shared Equip Changeover Time Weekly Scaled (minutes) [(G1 * G2 * X) / (60*G - (G1 * G2))]
"Availability" and/or "Performance Efficiency" Losses Not Captured (minutes) [AC - (AE * AF)]
B5) Process Specific Weekly Part Estimate [P * AM]
Demonstrated OEE > Required OEE? (Is AM > Q?)
forming & heat treatment0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
79.9% 80.2%
96.5%
Req'd OEE at APW Req'd OEE at MPW Demonstrated OEE
OE
E %
Approved
Rejected
Insert Signat
ure Image from file
Q2
Average Production Weekly (APW) is the average weekly quantity of parts specified by Ford to the supplier. The APW is the quantity of parts the supplier needs to be capable of producing to meet the planned long-term "Average" requirement of the supplier's Ford customer plants. Note: Plant weekly requirements vary
S2
Maximum Production Weekly (MPW) is the maximum weekly quantity of parts specified by Ford to the supplier. The MPW is the quantity of parts the supplier needs to be capable of producing to meet the planned short-term (up to 90 days) "Peak" requirement of the supplier's Ford customer plants.
J6
Enter date in "dd-mmm-yy" format, e.g. 12-Jun-10
C18
For shared processes, Allocation % includes changeover time into this part number
G20
Per tool or machine
K20
Per tool or machine
O20
Per tool or machine
S20
Per tool or machine
W20
Per tool or machine
AA20
Per tool or machine
AE20
Per tool or machine
AI20
Per tool or machine
G21
Per tool or machine
K21
Per tool or machine
O21
Per tool or machine
S21
Per tool or machine
W21
Per tool or machine
AA21
Per tool or machine
AE21
Per tool or machine
AI21
Per tool or machine
C32
For processes with multiple operations, use constraint.
C36
Assumes no unplanned breakdowns, no changeovers, and maintenance is done outside of planned production time.
G39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
I39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
K39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
M39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
O39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
Q39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
S39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
U39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
W39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
Y39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AA39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AC39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AE39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AG39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AI39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AK39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
C54
Scaling is required when the proportion of time spent conducting a changeover during the Phase 3 run is different than the proportion of time that a changeover will take during a normal production cycle.
G62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
K62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
O62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
S62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
W62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
AA62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
AE62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
AI62
Enter Planned Net Ideal Cycle Time (NICT) for Phase 0 run. If fewer tools, machines, or cavities are used for Phase 0 Run, please take this into account when calculating the Planned NICT.
C72
Scaled for Shared Process Changeovers
B73
Used to independently evaluate the specific process' potential for producing good parts. This part estimate does not take into account a blocked condition from a downstream process nor a starved condition from an upstream process. This part estimate assumes an unlimited supply of parts entering the process and is simply based on the specific process' Demonstrated OEE. This value does not represent the Overall Process Predicted Good Parts / Week. For that value, refer to the summary section at the bottom of this tab.
B74
Collect 15-20 cycles and calculate average. Study needs to be "good cycle to good cycle" with no blocked, starved, or unplanned downtime conditions. For processes with multiple operations, use the constraint cycle time. Review the results from the Phase 0 run (including the observed cycle time - item B6) to validate that the parts from Phase 0 were manufactured under production representative conditions. This will allow the use of Phase 0 parts in demonstrating compliance with all PPAP requirements, including PV testing.
G74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
K74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
O74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
S74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
W74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
AA74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
AE74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
AI74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place.
B80
These Predicted Good Part / Week APW and MPW values are recorded as PPC (Purchased Part Capacity) in the Ford capacity systems GCP (Vehicle) and MCPV (Powertrain). If any OEE > 100% in this report, the analysis must be corrected prior to entering the PPC values into the Ford system. Contact your STA engineer for assistance. Note: Estimated to be the lowest value in row B5 reduced by planned scrap losses (row H) of successive operations
Phase 3 PPAP (Capacity Verification)
Capacity Analysis Report version 4.3 Page 1 Date Revised: 8-Oct-10Date Printed:04/20/2023
A. New Model Required OEE - DİNAMİK YAY 2014 B460 08455-100 (773) 1 2350 3000 1
A1) Supplier & Part Information A2) Capacity Requirements APW MPW A3) Key ContactsDİNAMİK YAY Supplier Name B460 Program Code <PA> Requirements 2350 3000 Name Phone # EmailDEMİRKAPI/EYÜP/İSTANBUL Location/Site Code 2014 Model Year Revised Requirements STA Site EngineerB460 Part Name Source of Capacity Requirements Supplier Lead TAYFUN TURGAÇ 212 4933374 [email protected] (773) Part Number 11-Sep-13 Date of Study GCP/MCPV Ford Buyer
Capacity Requirements Supplier to demonstrate APW of 2350 parts per week operating no more than 5 days per weekSupplier to demonstrate MPW of 3000 parts per week operating no more than 6 days per week
A4) Planned Departmental Operating Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 Process 5 Process 6 Process 7 Process 8
Pattern & Net Available Time APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
A Process description (in value stream order) forming & heat treatment
B Days / Week 5.5 7C Shifts / Day 2 2D Total Hours / Shift 8 8
E 0 0
F Allocation Percent (enter 100 for dedicated) 6.2% 6.2%
G Net Available Time (hours / week) [B*C*(D-(E/60))*F] 5.46 6.94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -G1 Planned Minutes per Changeover (into this part #) 90G2 Planned Changeover Frequency / Week (into this part #) 0.13
A5) Required Good Parts / Week APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
H Percent of parts scrapped 0.1%
J 2350 3000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Avg. Weekly Max Weekly
Required Incoming Parts for 2352 3002
A6) Required OEE APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
K Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle) 6.68 6.68L # of Tools or Machines in parallel 1 1M # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle 1 1N Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] 6.68 6.68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N] 2940 3742 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q 79.9% 80.2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process) 0.0%
SYES YES - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
T16.6% 17.1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Enter any other assumptions for clarification
A7) Shared Process - Total Allocation Plan forming & heat treatment - - - - - - -
U Enter Total % Allocation from "Shared - Loading Plan" Tab
B. Supplier Demonstrated OEE - Phase 3 PPAP (Capacity Verification)B1) Equipment Availability forming & heat treatment - - - - - - -
V 405
W Planned Downtime - lunches/breaks/mtgs. (minutes) 0
X Net Available Time (minutes) [V - W] 405 - - - - - - -
Y Shared Equip Changeover Time ACTUAL (minutes)
Z 0 - - - - - - -
AB Observed Unplanned Downtime (minutes) 0
AC Operating Time (minutes) [X - Y - AB] 405 - - - - - - -
AD Equipment Availability [(X - Z - AB) / X * 100] 100.0% - - - - - - -
B2) Performance EfficiencyAE Total Parts Run (Good, Scrapped, & Reworked) 3500AF Net Ideal Cycle Time (seconds/part) [N] 6.7 - - - - - - -
AG Performance Efficiency (AE * AF / AC) 96.2% - - - - - - -AH 15 - - - - - - -
B3) Quality Rate # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # %
AJ # Parts Scrapped 0 - - - - - - - -AK # Parts Reworked 0 - - - - - - - -
AL Quality Rate [(AE - AJ - AK) / AE] 100.0% - - - - - - -
B4) Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
AM Phase 3 OEE [AD * AG * AL] 96.2% - - - - - - -
2828 3599 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B6) Observed Average Cycle Time (sec/cycle)
C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / WeekProcess Description forming & heat treatment
APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result
OK OK
Predicted Good Parts / Week
APW MPW
3128 3982
NOTES
SUPPLIER OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPROVAL FOR STA USEVersion 4.3
Authorized Representative Name / Title Email Site Engineer STA LL6 Supervisor
© 2010 Ford Motor CompanySignature Date Phone Number Signature/Date Signature/Date
Select for Analysis
Contractual Planned Downtime - lunch, breaks, etc.(minutes/shift)
Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process[Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts /
forming & heat treatment
Required OEE [J / P]
Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N) <= P]
% Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses {P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P
Total Available Time (Include ACTUAL changeover time for Shared) (minutes)
Shared Equip Changeover Time Weekly Scaled (minutes) [Y * (X / 60) / (G / G2)]
"Availability" and/or "Performance Efficiency" Losses Not Captured (minutes) [AC - (AE * AF)]
B5) Process Specific Weekly Part Estimate [P * AM]
Demonstrated OEE > Required OEE? (Is AM > Q?)
forming & heat treatment0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
79.9% 80.2%
96.2%
Req'd OEE at APW Req'd OEE at MPW Demonstrated OEE
OE
E %
Rejected
Approved
Rejected
Insert Signat
ure Image from file
Q2
Average Production Weekly (APW) is the average weekly quantity of parts specified by Ford to the supplier. The APW is the quantity of parts the supplier needs to be capable of producing to meet the planned long-term "Average" requirement of the supplier's Ford customer plants. Note: Plant weekly requirements vary
S2
Maximum Production Weekly (MPW) is the maximum weekly quantity of parts specified by Ford to the supplier. The MPW is the quantity of parts the supplier needs to be capable of producing to meet the planned short-term (up to 90 days) "Peak" requirement of the supplier's Ford customer plants.
J6
Enter date in "dd-mmm-yy" format, e.g. 12-Jun-10
C18
For shared processes, Allocation % includes changeover time into this part number
G20
Per tool or machine
K20
Per tool or machine
O20
Per tool or machine
S20
Per tool or machine
W20
Per tool or machine
AA20
Per tool or machine
AE20
Per tool or machine
AI20
Per tool or machine
G21
Per tool or machine
K21
Per tool or machine
O21
Per tool or machine
S21
Per tool or machine
W21
Per tool or machine
AA21
Per tool or machine
AE21
Per tool or machine
AI21
Per tool or machine
C32
For processes with multiple operations, use constraint.
C36
Assumes no unplanned breakdowns, no changeovers, and maintenance is done outside of planned production time.
G39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
I39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
K39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
M39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
O39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
Q39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
S39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
U39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
W39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
Y39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AA39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AC39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AE39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AG39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AI39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
AK39
If NO, Req'd Good Parts + Scrap + Rework + Parts lost to Changeover > Max Possible Parts
C54
Scaling is required when the proportion of time spent conducting a changeover during the Phase 3 run is different than the proportion of time that a changeover will take during a normal production cycle.
C58
Scaled for Shared Process Changeovers using the demonstrated/actual changeover
C72
Scaled for Shared Process Changeovers
B73
Used to independently evaluate the specific process' potential for producing good parts. This part estimate does not take into account a blocked condition from a downstream process nor a starved condition from an upstream process. This part estimate assumes an unlimited supply of parts entering the process and is simply based on the specific process' Demonstrated OEE. This value does not represent the Overall Process Predicted Good Parts / Week. For that value, refer to the summary section at the bottom of this tab.
B74
Collect 15-20 cycles and calculate average. Study needs to be "good cycle to good cycle" with no blocked, starved, or unplanned downtime conditions. For processes with multiple operations, use the constraint cycle time.
G74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
K74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
O74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
S74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
W74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
AA74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
AE74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
AI74
If the Observed Average Cycle Time is greater than the Ideal Cycle Time in Row K, ensure there is a Cycle Time Improvement Plan in place
B80
These Predicted Good Part / Week APW and MPW values are recorded as PPC (Purchased Part Capacity) in the Ford capacity systems GCP (Vehicle) and MCPV (Powertrain). If any OEE > 100% in this report, the analysis must be corrected prior to entering the PPC values into the Ford system. Contact your STA engineer for assistance. Note: Estimated to be the lowest value in row B5 reduced by planned scrap losses (row H) of successive operations
Surrogate OEE Summary
Capacity Analysis Report version 4.3 Page 1Date Revised: 8-Oct-10
Date Printed:04/20/2023
GPP = Good Parts Produced NICT = Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) NAT = Net Available Time (hrs/wk) OEE = Overall Equipment Effectiveness [GPP/(NAT/NPICT)]
forming & heat treatment
WK# Date (mm/dd/yyyy) GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE
WK1 6/6/2013 10000 4.9 14.8 91.5% - - - - - - -
WK2 6/7/2013 10000 4.9 14.8 91.5% - - - - - - -
WK3 6/8/2013 10000 4.9 13.5 100.0% - - - - - - -
WK4 6/10/2013 10000 4.0 12.2 91.8% - - - - - - -
WK5 6/11/2013 10000 4.0 11.2 100.0% - - - - - - -
WK6 6/12/2013 10000 4.0 12.2 91.8% - - - - - - -
WK7 6/13/2013 10000 4.0 11.2 100.0% - - - - - - -
WK8 - - - - - - - -
WK9 - - - - - - - -
WK10 - - - - - - - -
WK11 - - - - - - - -
WK12 - - - - - - - -
WK13 - - - - - - - -
WK14 - - - - - - - -
WK15 - - - - - - - -
WK16 - - - - - - - -
WK17 - - - - - - - -
WK18 - - - - - - - -
WK19 - - - - - - - -
WK20 - - - - - - - -
WK21 - - - - - - - -
WK22 - - - - - - - -
WK23 - - - - - - - -
WK24 - - - - - - - -
WK25 - - - - - - - -
AVERAGE SURROGATE OEE 95.2% - - - - - - -
Demonstrated (Surrogate) Performance History
6/6/
2013
6/7/
2013
6/8/
2013
6/9/
2013
6/10
/201
3
6/11
/201
3
6/12
/201
3
6/13
/201
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
forming & heat treatment
OEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
6/6/
2013
6/7/
2013
6/8/
2013
6/9/
2013
6/10
/201
3
6/11
/201
3
6/12
/201
3
6/13
/201
30%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OEEOEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
6/6/
2013
6/7/
2013
6/8/
2013
6/9/
2013
6/10
/201
3
6/11
/201
3
6/12
/201
3
6/13
/201
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OEE
OEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
6/6/
2013
6/7/
2013
6/8/
2013
6/9/
2013
6/10
/201
3
6/11
/201
3
6/12
/201
3
6/13
/201
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OEE
OEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
6/6/
2013
6/7/
2013
6/8/
2013
6/9/
2013
6/10
/201
3
6/11
/201
3
6/12
/201
3
6/13
/201
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OEE
OEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
6/6/
2013
6/7/
2013
6/8/
2013
6/9/
2013
6/10
/201
3
6/11
/201
3
6/12
/201
3
6/13
/201
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OEE
OEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
6/6
/20
13
6/7
/20
13
6/8
/20
13
6/9
/20
13
6/1
0/2
01
3
6/1
1/2
01
3
6/1
2/2
01
3
6/1
3/2
01
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OEE
OEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
6/6/
2013
6/7/
2013
6/8/
2013
6/9/
2013
6/10
/201
3
6/11
/201
3
6/12
/201
3
6/13
/201
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OEE
OEE
Su
rro
gat
e O
EE
G4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
M4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
S4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
Y4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
AE4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
AK4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
AQ4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
AW4
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
Shared - Loading Plan
Capacity Analysis Report version 4.3 Page 1Date Revised: 8-Oct-10
Date Printed:04/20/2023
Shared Process Loading Plan NICT = Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) Date of Study 11-Sep-2013
Study Phase Phase 0 PPAP (Run @ Rate) PROCESS FORMING AND HEAT TREATMENT
Departmental Operating Pattern for Average Weekly Departmental Operating Pattern for Max Weekly
Days / Week 5.5 7Shifts / Day 2 2Total Hours / Shift 8 8
0 0
Net Available Time (NAT) (hrs/week) 88.00 112.00
95.2% 95.2%
Loading Plan to meet Average Weekly Loading Plan to meet Max Weekly
Part Ford Part # or "Non-Ford" NICT NICT
1 07772(765) 4700 4.86 6.7 7.6% 6000 4.86 8.5 7.6%2 07773(766) 2350 5.40 3.7 4.2% 3000 5.40 4.7 4.2%3 07791(768) 2350 4.86 3.3 3.8% 3000 4.86 4.3 3.8%4 07972(772) 2350 4.86 3.3 3.8% 3000 4.86 4.3 3.8%5 00352(512),00368(513) 2650 4.62 3.6 4.1% 3370 4.62 4.5 4.1%6 08171(667).08170(668) 785 5.85 1.3 1.5% 1000 5.85 1.7 1.5%7 08241(538) 08242(539) 2740 4.86 3.9 4.4% 3488 4.86 4.9 4.4%8 08336(694) 08337(695) 2740 4.86 3.9 4.4% 3488 4.86 4.9 4.4%9 05320(687),05321(688) 3920 4.03 4.6 5.2% 4990 4.03 5.9 5.2%
10 08141(526) 785 5.85 1.3 1.5% 1000 5.85 1.7 1.5%11 05405(690),05437(691) 3920 4.86 5.6 6.3% 4990 4.86 7.1 6.3%12 08114(641) 590 3.31 0.6 0.6% 750 3.31 0.7 0.6%13 05284(696) 05283(697) 2740 4.68 3.7 4.3% 3488 4.68 4.8 4.3%14 71719(704) 71844(705) 2740 3.60 2.9 3.3% 3488 3.60 3.7 3.3%15 07340,07341,07351,07352 6280 4.68 8.6 9.7% 7992 4.68 10.9 9.7%16 04536,04537,04474 590 4.68 0.8 0.9% 750 4.68 1.0 0.9%17 08331(699),08332(700) 3725 4.86 5.3 6.0% 4740 4.86 6.7 6.0%18 00449,00443,00439,00447,00441,03249 980 3.47 1.0 1.1% 1247 3.47 1.3 1.1%19 08281,08282,08286,08287,08289,08290 2350 4.41 3.0 3.4% 3000 4.41 3.9 3.4%20 08455(773) 2350 6.68 4.6 5.2% 3000 6.68 5.8 5.2%21 Other % Allocation - Description
22 Other % Allocation - Description
Percentage of Net Available Time not utilized for production (%) {PM, etc.}
Total % Allocation 51635 71.7 81.4% 65781 91.3 81.5%If Total % Allocation > 100%, loading plan exceeds capacity
Contractual Planned Downtime - lunch, breaks, etc. (minutes/shift)
Demonstrated OEE: Enter average OEE from most recent production performance data; Surrogate OEE tab may be used for this calculation
Req'd Good Parts / Week
Time Req'd @ Demonstrated
OEE (hrs/week)
% AllocationMinimum Required
Req'd Good Parts / Week
Time Req'd @ Demonstrated
OEE (hrs/week)
% AllocationMinimum Required
B12
The calculation of the OEE for the shared loading plan needs to be consistent with the calculation of OEE used in this workbook. See the Capacity Planning, Phase 0 or Phase 3 tabs for the calculation method
D12
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
I12
For shared process OEE calculation, Net Available Time must include changeovers
C14
Include parts that will be produced on shared equipment during model year production period.
D14
Use same methodology as Row J on Capacity Planning tab to determine Required Good Parts / Week
E14
Use same methodology as Row N on Capacity Planning tab to determine NICT
F14
= [Req'd Good Parts/Week] * NICT / Surrogate OEE
I14
Use same methodology as Row J on Capacity Planning tab to determine Required Good Parts / Week
J14
Use same methodology as Row N on Capacity Planning tab to determine NICT
K14
= [Req'd Good Parts/Week] * NICT / Surrogate OEE
