7. 14 CFR PART 145 FAA SUPPLEMENT et...MANUAL MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-1...

DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services

Parc Algorithmes Immeuble Thalès

17, ave Didier Daurat 31700 BLAGNAC

MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION

MANUAL

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-1

7. 14 CFR PART 145 FAA SUPPLEMENT

SAMPLE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) SUPPLEMENT TO AMO MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION MANUAL (MOM)

FAA AIR AGENCY CERTIFICATE N° 3VAY218B EASA PART 145 approval certificate n° FR.145.107

DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services Parc algorithmes Immeuble Thalès

17, avenue Didier DAURAT 31700 Blagnac

France Tel : +33 5 34 60 61 40 Fax: +33 5 34 60 61 50

This FAA Supplement, together with this organisation’s OSAC-approved maintenance organisation exposition, forms the basis of acceptance by the FAA for maintenance, alterations, or modifications carried out by this organisation on aircraft and/or aircraft components under the regulatory control of the FAA.

Maintenance, alterations, or modifications performed in accordance with the Maintenance Organization Manual (MOM), including this Supplement, are considered to be in compliance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 43 and 145.





MANUAL


7.1. LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES

The pages of this chapter are the following:

CHAPTER MOM COMPLIANCE

REF

EFFECTIVE PAGES ISSUE

7. 14 CFR PART 145 FAA supplement 7.1 - List of effective pages 7.2 - Revision procedure 7.3 - Introduction 7.4 - Accountable Manager Statement 7.5 - Extent of approval 7.6 - Summary of the Quality Systems 7.7 - Approval for return to service and maintenance, alteration and modification records 7.8 - Reporting of unairworthy conditions to the FAA 7.9 - Additional Operating Locations 7.10 - Contracting / Subcontracting 7.11 - Major repairs and major alterations7.12 - Compliance with US Air carrier Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Programme (CAMP) or 14 CFR PART 125 Operator Inspection Procedures 7.13 - Compliance with manufacturers’ maintenance manuals or instructions for continued airworthiness (ICA) 7.14 - Qualification of personnel 7.15 - Forms

§0.3;1.11 §3.1;2.25;5 §3 §2.2 §2.18;2.2.6 §1.11;3.10

§2.8;2.11.1 §2.22

7-1 7-2 7-3 7-3 to 7-4 7-5 7-6 to 7-7 7-7 7-8 to 7-9 7-9 to 7-10 7-10 to 7-11 7-11 7-11 to 7-12 7-12 to 7-13 7-13 to 7-14

7-14 to 7-15 7-16 to 7-21

Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9 Issue 9





MANUAL


7.2. REVISION PROCEDURES

This supplement is written by the responsible of PART 145 activities, checked by the quality manager who is responsible, by delegation of the accountable manager, for compliance with CFR 14 Part 145. This supplement is revised as necessary to reflect any change in the organization of the company and reviewed at least once a year by the same people as quoted above. All revisions must be incorporated into the internal quality system (QAS). The quality manager consults once a month websites FAA, EASA and OSAC to reflect regulatory changes in the supplement. The same way as the MOE, for which amendment procedure is detailed in § 1.11, amendments to this supplement, accompanied by the FAA Form 8310-3 issued by the Quality Manager and signed by the Accountable Manager, are submitted to the French Civil Aviation Authorities OSAC for approval before implementation. Changes in the MOM are integrated into the internal audit program. ln case of a change of the Accountable Manager, the commitment duly signed shown at § 7.4 of this manual is enclosed with the request. This supplement is dispatched according to the list of manual holders defined in § 0.3 of the MOM. This dispatch is performed and controlled by the quality department. Each copy is identified with a number. Each holder acknowledges receipt of this supplement and is then responsible for maintaining and updating it.

7.3. INTRODUCTION

This supplement together with this MOE Part 145 is the basis of acceptance by the FAA for maintenance carried out by DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services company on aircraft under the regulatory control of the FAA. Maintenance performed in accordance with the referenced MOE, including this supplement, is considered to be in compliance with 14 CFR Part 145. The company performs work under 14 CFR Part 145, in accordance with the Bilateral Agreement BA / Maintenance Annex executed between the FAA and the DGAC. This FAA supplement, in conjunction with the approved MOE Part 145 of the company, defines the organization and procedures upon which compliance with 14 CFR Part 145 is based. The Maintenance Annex allows the company to obtain certification and renewal as a foreign repair station under Maintenance Annex and 14 CFR Part 145 for the purpose of performing work on aeronautical products subject to the FAR. Certification or renewal as a repair station is obtained as a result of the FAA review and acceptance of the inspection, surveillance, and evaluation of the company by the OSAC. The purpose of the FAA supplement to the MOM (MOM chapter 7) is to identify the procedures that must be taken into account for the company to perform work under 14 CFR Part 145. These procedures are addressed by FAA Special Conditions in the Maintenance Annex and may be in addition to those set forth in other portions of this MOM. The supplement sets forth the methods and procedures the company uses to ensure compliance





MANUAL

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-4 with the FAA Special Conditions specified in the Maintenance Annex executed pursuant to a Bilateral Agreement (BA).





MANUAL


7.5. EXTENT OF APPROVAL

7.5.1. Approval schedule

The extent of FAA approval will neither exceed the scope of work permitted under the EASA approval nor the scope of approval set forth in the 14 CFR Part 145 Air Agency Certificate and OpSpecs. The approval schedule covers maintenance (FAA class 4 / EASA aircraft class – category A1) for the following aircraft types: AIRCRAFT TYPE ENGINE TYPE PLACE MAINTENANCE Boeing B767-300/400ER CF6-80/PW 4000 Nice Line B1/B2 Boeing B767-200 ER GE-CF6 Dublin Line B1/B2 Boeing B757- 200 RB 211 Dublin Line B1/B2 The FAA approval concerns line maintenance activity on several stations located in Europe. The quality department ensures that every station complies with procedures detailed in the MOE, including chapter 7, through: - MOE and associated procedures training included in the initial and continuation training for any person working in the stations, - Quality audits such as described in MOE § 3.1 and § 5.

7.5.2. Specialized services (Not applicable)

7.5.3. Capability list

The maintenance activities covered by the FAA approval are the following: AIRCRAFT TYPE ENGINE TYPE PLACE MAINTENANCE Boeing B767-300/400ER CF6-80/PW 4000 Nice Line B1/B2 Boeing B767-200 ER GE-CF6 Dublin Line B1/B2 Boeing B757- 200 RB 211 Dublin Line B1/B2 The approved maintenance sites, with all contacts, are described in DOC.MOE.02. DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services acknowledges the Capability List (CL) is an FAA OpSPecs.





MANUAL

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 -7 The company performs line maintenance for the following airlines: AIRLINE AIRCRAFT TYPE ENGINE TYPE PLACE RESPONSIBLE Delta Airlines Boeing B767-300/400ER CF6-80/PW 4000 Nice Station manager US AIRWAYS Boeing B767-200 ER GE-CF6 Dublin Station manager US AIRWAYS Boeing B757- 200 RB 211 Dublin Station manager The compliance with regulation is controlled through internal audit program. The line maintenance activity is performed in compliance with operators’ line maintenance procedures and maintenance program referenced in the commercial agreement: all concerned engineers are trained to those procedures, and the compliance is ensured by the station manager. Any deviations to those procedures notified by the customers are recorded in the non-conformity management system, in accordance with INS.01.03, with implementation of corrective actions required.

7.6. SUMMARY OF THE QUALITY SYSTEMS.

The organization of the company is described in § 1, quality system is described in § 3 of the MOE and can be made available to the FAA upon request. For stations where maintenance on US air carriers’ aircraft is performed, the scope of audit will cover the requirements linked to the FAA approval and supplement. Audit reports will detail items checked in this frame.





MANUAL


7.7. APPROVAL FOR RETURN TO SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE, ALTERATION AND MODIFICATION RECORDS

7.7.1. Return to service of US registered aircraft

The procedure for return to service of US registered aircraft is similar to the procedure for return to service described in MOE § 2.16, and is performed in compliance with air carriers’ procedures (use of techlog). Detailed information with approval for return to service: In addition to information requested by the customers, the records of approval for return to service must include the following elements: a description (or reference to the data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed, the date of completion of the work, the name of the person performing the work (the repair station name and address), the signature of the person authorized to return the aircraft to service, FAA repair station and certificate number

7.7.2. Release to service documents

The certificates of release to service are issued on the techlogs of customers airlines (the FAA approval concerns line maintenance only): AIRLINE AIRCRAFT TYPE ENGINE TYPE REFERENCE OF APPROVED

TECHLOG Delta Airlines Boeing B767-300/400ER CF6-80/PW 4000 041240205 US AIRWAYS Boeing B767-200 ER GE-CF6 US-100(00-0703-3-0470)53321 US AIRWAYS Boeing B757- 200 RB 211 US-100(00-0703-3-0470)53321





EXPOSITION


7.7.3. Acceptability of Component

The acceptance of authorized release certificates of parts installed on aircraft is described in MOE § 2.2. In the frame of the FAA approval, the acceptance of authorized release certificates includes the FAA tag 8130-3 of aircraft parts. PMA parts are acceptable on US aircraft with proper documentation MOM §2.2.3. If the authorized release certificates available are EASA forms 1 édition 2, the staff will control that they are Dual release. Dual release statement must contain: “The work identified in Block 12 and described herein has been accomplished in accordance with 14 CFR part 43 and in respect to that work, items are approved for return to service under certificate N° -------. In the frame of the FAA approval, the company will not issue authorized release certificates for aircraft parts.

7.7.4. Recordkeeping requirements for major repairs and major alterations

This chapter is not applicable in the frame of line maintenance activity covered by the FAA approval (no major repair or alteration performed).

7.7.5. Working language

The maintenance, alteration, and modification entries required by the MAG’s and the entries required by the operator's maintenance program are written in the English language.

7.8. REPORTING OF UNAIRWORTHY CONDITIONS TO THE FAA

7.8.1. Reporting procedure

In the case where a serious defect or recurring unairworthy condition in any component that is subject to the regulatory control of the FAA is discovered, the engineer must inform the station manager who initiates an investigation and reports immediately the problem to the Quality Manager: this is performed in accordance with the procedure detailed in § 2.18 of the MOM. Within 72 hours after discovery of this serious defect, the Quality Manager submits to the FAA SDR form entitled Service Difficulty Reporting duly filled in on line https://av-info.faa.gov/SDRX/ plus copy to OSAC and customer.





EXPOSITION


7.8.2. Responsibilities

ACTION WHEN RESPONSIBLE Issuance of an occurrence reporting detected in maintenance DOC MOE 16 (MOE § 2.18) and transmission to the quality department

At the latest 48 hours after discovery of the defect Station manager

Issuance of SDR Form At the latest 72 hours after discovery of the defect Quality manager

7.8.3. Suspected unapproved parts reporting requirements

In case where a part is suspected to be unapproved, the Quality Manager is informed accordingly. The part is tagged « Unserviceable » and kept in the quarantaine area untill further information and final decision. According to § 2.2.6 of the MOE, the form referenced AC 131 and called SUSPECTED UNAPPROVED

PART NOTIFICATION is issued in English language by the station manager, transmitted to the quality manager who is in charge to send it to the OSAC and to the FAA, in accordance with OSAC documentation P-41-31 and FAA AC 21-29. The responsibilities regarding notification of suspected unapproved parts are detailed hereunder: ACTION WHEN RESPONSIBLE Issuance of AC 131 form and transmission to the quality department

At the latest 48 hours after discovery of the defect Station manager

Transmission to OSAC and FAA At the latest 72 hours after discovery of the defect Quality manager

7.9. ADDITIONAL OPERATING LOCATIONS

-Line Station Authorisations: This supplement is revised as necessary to reflect any change of additional fixed locations within the EC Member States, or line station authorization located within the European Community in the organization The same way as the MOE, for which amendment procedure (Adding or deleting line station) is detailed in § 1.11, amendments to this supplement, accompanied by the FAA Form 8310-3 issued by the Quality Manager and signed by the Accountable Manager, are submitted to the French Civil Aviation Authorities OSAC for approval before implementation. Additional operating locations are integrated into the MOE and the supplement, under the full control of the quality assurance system (QAS).





EXPOSITION

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-11 -Work away from a fixed Location: If for an exceptional reason, some maintenance activity covered by the FAA approval schedule must be performed out of the approved maintenance sites listed in B050 and D107 OpSpecs. (see §3.10 of the current MOM or §7.5.1 of the supplement) The organization must ensure that: All requests will be sent to the quality manager or his deputy (DOC MOE 17-1) Through the document "DOC MOE 17-1" the Quality Manager or his deputy ensures that the maintenance activity:

- is covered by the approval, - is performed with the required tooling, maintenance data and qualified personnel with appropriate recurrent training such as customers’ procedures, - is released by an engineer authorized to issue CRS under current 14CFR PART 145

certifying staff list, - Supervising of work away will be done by at least Team leader or Engineer (certifying

staff) declared in DOC MOE 17-1. - On-site the Team leader should validate the Maintenance Site Validation Report (DOC.01.02.04) stating all the personnel, equipment, materials or parts required on the site. After intervention the document DOC.MOE.17-2 will be completed and sent to the quality manager or his deputy indicating the different problems met. All maintenance documents and documents DOC MOE 17-1 and DOC MOE 17-2 are archived and available to the authority for at least three years. The organization will not perform work within the territory of United States.

7.10. CONTRACTING / SUBCONTRACTING

DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services does not subcontract any maintenance tasks to maintenance organisations. Consequently, this chapter is not applicable.

7.11. MAJOR REPAIRS AND MAJOR ALTERATIONS

7.11.1. Definitions

Major alterations are those which are not listed in the aircraft, engine or propeller specifications: -That might appreciably affect weight, balance, structural strength, performance, powerplant operation, flight characteristics, or other qualities affecting airworthiness, or, -That is not done according to accepted practices or cannot be done by elementary operations.





EXPOSITION

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-12 More precisely, is considered as a major alteration, any alteration which, if it did not work properly or was not performed correctly could: -Have an impact on flight safety or could prevent landing for all the types of operations for which the aircraft is approved, or, -Affect the safety of crew or passengers. Any alteration not classifiable as major is considered as minor. Major alterations are listed in appendix A to PART 43 (a). Major repairs are those that: -if improperly done, might appreciably affect weight, balance, structural strength, performance, power-plant operation, flight characteristics, or other qualities affecting airworthiness or that, -are not done according to accepted practices or elementary operations. Minor repair is any repair, other than a major repair.

7.11.2. Approval schedule

The scope of the FAA approval covers line maintenance activity only. Thus, DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services is not authorized to perform major alterations or repairs, and will ensure that no operation of this type will be performed in the frame of the FAA approval.

7.12. COMPLIANCE WITH US AIR CARRIER CONTINUOUS AIRWORTHINESS MAINTENANCE PROGRAMME ( CAMP) OR 14 CFR PART 125 OPERATOR INSPECTION PROGRAMME

7.12.1. Procedures

The documentary system used by the company is in compliance with manufacturers' manuals or instruction for continued airworthiness. It is also in compliance with specific instructions defined in US air carrier's manuals. The application of carriers or CFR 14 PART 125 operators’ procedures is one of the elements of the contract review during which all the specific requirements of customers are studied before the integration in the work schedule. Works will be performed by personnel properly trained. Initial and recurrent training of our staff is performed by the operator; the recording is done through its computer system. After training, a list of personnel authorized by the operator is sent to the Quality Manager for taking into account in the system of qualification Any deviation from these manuals or instructions requires documented approval from the operator. The US Air Carrier should provide a letter accepting the AMO’s maintenance procedures that are different from the Air Carrier’s CAMP procedure.





EXPOSITION

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-13 Nota: Tools and equipments calibration intervals: Air carriers must inform the organization on his requirement, in opposite case the organization must apply §2.5 of his MOE.

7.12.2. Required Inspection Items (RII)

Required Inspection Items are identified in the US operator's manual and should be performed according to the operator's manual by authorized personnel not involved in the performance of the task to be inspected. During the inspection phase, the RII qualified inspector is under the supervision of the Quality Manager ln case where Required Inspection Items would be identified in the operator's manual, the person performing RII would be trained, qualified, and authorized by the air carrier for which the RII would be performed. Then, the RII “rating” is recorded by Quality Department in the file of concerned persons, and appears in the “Airlines procedures training and associated authorisations” (page 2 of DOC.04.10.02). The findings of the RII could not be overruled neither by the Repair Station Organisation nor by the maintenance department of the air carrier whom the RII is conducted.

7.13. COMPLIANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS’ MAINTENANCE MANUALS OR INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONTINUED AIRWORTHINESS (ICA)

7.13.1. Compliance with manufacturers’ maintenance manuals or instructions for continued airworthiness (ICA)

All the documentation used in the frame of FAA approval is described in § 2.8 of the MOE. Thus, the documentation used is: instructions of manufacturers’ maintenance manuals or instructions for continued airworthiness. The documentation used is also in compliance with specific instructions defined in air carriers’ manuals. In the case where an air carrier’s maintenance program deviates from the procedures specified in the corresponding manufacturer’s manual, the concerned air carrier must provide to DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services the document showing that the deviation is FAA approved. When using an air carrier’s documentation different from the manufacturer’s manual, the CRS engineer must check that the maintenance procedures to be applied are in compliance with the manufacturer’s procedures. If they are not, he must check if the deviation is FAA approved thanks to the document provided by the air carrier. If this document is not unavailable, DERICHEBOURG Atis maintenance Services quality department will contact the air carrier to ask for the FAA approval.





EXPOSITION

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-14 DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services will not convert and translate technical data into internal documents. All the maintenance tasks performed are recorded according to the procedures of air carrier’s manual.

7.13.2. Work Orders

All maintenance performed for US air carriers must be recorded in accordance with carrier’s manuel. Each works requested from air carriers outside contract will be recorded on a work order signed and dated by the repair station. DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services is not authorized to perform major alterations or repairs. In the frame of line maintenance, the station manager is responsible for checking that the work ordered remains in the limit of the extent of FAA approval.

7.13.3. FAA airworthiness directives(AD)

The procedures for airworthiness directives management in the frame of line maintenance are described in § 2.11.1 of the MOE. In the frame of the FAA approval, the FAA airworthiness management is under air carrier’s responsibility except for the work contracted through the station contract.

7.14. QUALIFICATION OF PERSONNEL

The organizational chart of the company regarding aircraft maintenance is detailed in § 1.5 of the MOE. The person in charge of interface with OSAC is: Name: Pascal PARISIS Function: Quality manager Telephone: +33 5 34 60 44 32 Fax: +33 5 34 60 61 50 The liaison between the quality manager and the OSAC ensures compliance with the provisions of § 7 of the MOE. The procedures to ensure that DERICHEBOURG Atis Maintenance Services has sufficient resources to perform, supervise and inspect work performed in the frame of the approval are described in § 2.22 of the MOE. The quality department ensures that all the staff who could be involved in maintenance on US carriers’ aircraft are correctly trained to -Chapter 7 of the MOE,





EXPOSITION

MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-15 -US carriers’ line maintenance procedures. In order to simplify the supervision, all the personnel of stations working on US air carriers’ aircraft must be trained When hiring the staff, Human Resources department together with Line Maintenance Manager must check that all the staff authorized to issue CRS or to perform inspections is able to read, write and understand English language. Through EASA PART145 / PART 66 requirements and documentations, engineers are able to read and write English language. Nevertheless and in order to be sure that understanding and speaking will be clear enough to carry out maintenance tasks, the station manager will perform assessments through conference calls. If the result has been judged adequate following two assessments, an email will be sent to Quality manager or his deputy to inform level of understanding with terms as follows “high, intermediate or inadequate”. Whether the English knowledge level is considered as inadequate, trainings will be scheduled with the cooperation of the human resources department to enhance the engineer’s English skills. The level of the assessment is recorded in the DOC.04.10.02 “engineer personnel file” by the quality department and can be provided to the FAA upon request.




MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION EXPOSITION


7.15. FORMS

7.15.1. Authorized release certificate FAA form 8130-3






7.15.2. EASA form 1 (refer to MOE §2.16.5)






7.15.3. US carriers’ techlog





MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-19 USE 1: Acft No: identifies the aircraft on the logsheet 2: Serial No: identifies a specific logsheet for an aircraft 3: Airworthiness release: after maintenance, preventive maintenance or alterations are performed on an aircraft, the

Airworthiness Release entry of the log sheet must be completed before the aircraft is released for service. 4: APU hours: hours or cycles when required. 5: From:Flight Originated City / To:Flight destination city / Date: date of the flight / Flight No: Flight number / TO Pwr:

the takeoff power that was used. 6: Autoland:Indicates the results of an attempted autoland. An "S" indicates that the autoland was successful and a “U”

that it was unsuccessful. Unsuccessful “U” requires a log book entry. 7: Arrival oil Qty (Gal) & arrival fuel Qty (not required) 8: OIL (CSD/ENG) In Pints: Any time oil is added to a CSD, IDG or engine, the quantity, in pints must be recorded in the

blocks for the appropriate engine. A, B and C correspond to engines 1, 2, and 3 respectively, enter 0 if no oil was added during servicing/check.CSD or IDG oil is recorded in the appropriate block for the engine in front of the slash (/). Engine oil is recorded behind the slash.

APU OIL: If oil is added to the auxiliary power unit the quantity is recorded here in pints. HYD. Fluid: When a hydraulic system is serviced the system is noted in this block (e.g., L, C, R or A, B). Quantity in

pints. 9: TYPE CHECK: A mechanic performing a Trip Check on the aircraft utiiizing the code TRIP. Nota: ETOPS Pre-departure checks and ETOPS International checks must be recorded in the logbook lrreg.lcorr.actn. sections

and coded as 0520. 10: AMT signature for check: Signature of the mechanic who performed the Trip check Nota: This block is not used to sign for the servicing of aircraft fluids (oil, hydraulic, etc.). It is only used for TRIP check

documented sign off. 11: Item No: An item number is assigned to each logbook write-up in ascending order. The item number should be three

digits (example 001, 002, 003, etc.). 12: FRM code: The pilots may enter a fault code from the aircraft's Fault Reporting Manual. 13: Maintenance problems (irregularities) are recorded in this area by the flight crew or by maintenance personnel. All

problems and malfunctions are to be recorded in a detailed and clear manner. ALL problems must be addressed by maintenance prior to dispatch of the aircraft except for: “Info Only” sign-off by

maintenance or placards installed by pilots.





MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-20 14: Corr actn: any maintenance or corrective action taken for the reported problem should be recorded in this area. The

entry should provide complete details and contain no vague or confusing items. 15: AMT signature: the mechanic’s signature must be written here (Black medium ball point pen only) 16: ID No: The A&P Certificate number or FAA Air Agency Certificate number of the mechanic signing the signature block. 17: Sta: the three letter station identifier code 18: ATA code: Four-digit code for the problem ATA chapter number, sub-system and sub-sub-system. These are found on

the front cover of the individual logbooks. 19: Pos: Position code for the part or system with the problem. These are found on the cover of the logbook. 20: Circle if applicable: if the problem falls into any ofthese categories it is noted by circling, SDR: Service Difficulty Report (refer to TOPP 20-50-20) RII (Required Inspection Item) (refer to TOPP 40-30-05 and § Any of these will require fax of the logsheet to TMC at ( ) 404-715-7915. Call before faxing Nota: Call the appropriate desk before faxing because the TMC might want it to be faxed to a different number. 21: Man-hours: The number of man-hours required to perform the corrective action. 22: Elapsed time: not used at this time 23: MALF Code:The three digit alphanumeric code to indicate; the source of the problem, status of the problem and status

of any parts need to correct the irregularity. This information is provided on the front cover of the logbook. Nota: All crew write-ups must be cleared using a 1 or 4. 24: MCO or MSU control No: Control number for existing maintenance carry-orders, maintenance set-up items, or inbound

maintenance action required items. 25: Skill: a two digit number indicating the skill used to clear the irregularity. 02= airframe/engine, 06=avionics/electrical 26: S/N off: Serial number of a component removed 27: S/N on: Serial number of a component installed The serial number OFF and ON blocks are only used in conjunction with a Delta part number. For non-Delta part number

components installed, record the ON serial number in the corr actn. Block. 28: DAL P/N Installed: The Delta company part number of a component installed. For hardware components such as bolts,

nuts seals, etc., the Delta part number is not required. 29: FIM: If the FIM code entered by the pilot was used as an aid to locating and correcting the problem by the Fault Isolation

Method (FIM) circle as indicated.






US AIRWAYS techlog

Refer to US AIRWAYS MPPM 54-01

7. 14 CFR PART 145 FAA SUPPLEMENT et...MANUAL MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-1...

Documents

Transcript of 7. 14 CFR PART 145 FAA SUPPLEMENT et...MANUAL MOE PART 7 Issue 9 Amendment date: 22/10/2013 Page 7-1...