6620card Module3(4)
26
Are Electronic Books Gesture-Based Computing Smart Objects the future of education? 21 22 23
-
Upload
leonia-card -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.101 -
download
0
description
Presentation for Module 3 in ED6620. Are electronic books, gesture-based computing and smart objects the future of education?
Transcript of 6620card Module3(4)
AreAreElectronic Books
Gesture-Based Computing
Smart Objects
the future of education?
21
22
23
Technology Transforming EducationTechnology Transforming Education
24
1. Electronic Books (EBs)
2. Gesture-Based Computing(GBC)
3. Smart Objects
1. Electronic Books (EBs)
2. Gesture-Based Computing(GBC)
3. Smart Objects
25
26
27
Electronic BooksElectronic Books28
21
Learning PotentialLearning Potential
Electronic books
embrace illustrations and print
will allow readers to interact with text10
engaging
incorporate interactive components into the curriculum16
Future Benefits of EBs in EducationFuture Benefits of EBs in Education
EBs can becheaper to
maintain thantextbooks
EBs will be more portable than traditional
textbooks3
29
Educational BenefitsEducational Benefits
Electronic bookswill accommodate many learning needs
and styles
will have more developed tools andfeatures3
will encourage interaction with text10
will be perceived by as funand motivating
will stimulate users10
Current ChallengesCurrent Challenges
Electronic books
Eye fatigue12
Content property rights15
Cultural resistance15
Power supply20
Difficulty reading large amounts12
Educational Future of EBsEducational Future of EBs
30
Gesture-Based ComputingGesture-Based Computing
Gesture-based computing is:• devices that accept multiple simultaneous inputs and gesture-based inputs17
• examples: Nintendo Wii & iPhone
Gesture-based computing is:• devices that accept multiple simultaneous inputs and gesture-based inputs17
• examples: Nintendo Wii & iPhone31
Learning PotentialLearning Potential32
33
Future Benefits of GBC in EducationFuture Benefits of GBC in Education
Will enhancereal-world
learning activitiesCan facilitateinterpretation,
learning, translationof sign language1
Can improve finemotor skills
Will Provide real-time
information anddata to users8
Will supportcollaborative work,role-playing, and
simulation training17
Current ChallengesCurrent Challenges
Gesture-based computing
Use unnatural gestures13
Unable to interpret all possible hand gestures13
Cumbersome and awkward4
Expensive4
Hard to remember gestures13
Educational Future of GBCEducational Future of GBC
34
Smart ObjectsSmart Objects
Smart Objects are:• radio frequency identification tags (RFID), quick response codes, & smart cards
• devices that connect the physical and virtual world of information7
Smart Objects are:• radio frequency identification tags (RFID), quick response codes, & smart cards
• devices that connect the physical and virtual world of information7
23
Learning PotentialLearning Potential
Smart objects
have the potential to make life simpler
have ability to sense, adjust andcommunicate with other smart objects6
Future Benefits of Smart Objects in Education
Future Benefits of Smart Objects in EducationWill increase
collaboration by connecting students and
teachersWill provide users
with access to virtual resources and participants9
Will create simulated
work learningenvironments9
Will help foster in-depth
conceptualunderstanding9
Will enable diverselearners to succeed in
multiple contexts9
Educational BenefitsEducational Benefits
Smart objects
will decrease theft of resources19
will improve stocktaking19
can speed up library procedures19
Current ChallengesCurrent Challenges
Smart objects
Privacy infringement14
Possible health implications19
Identification theft19
Security concerns14
Costly19
Educational Future of Smart ObjectsEducational Future of Smart Objects
35
Technology Evolving The Future of Education
Technology Evolving The Future of Education
Traditionalface-to-face
teaching strategies
Technology
Education that improves student
learning
ReferencesReferences1. Billinghurst, M. (2009). Gesture based interaction. Haptic Input (pp. 1-
34). Retrieved from http://billbuxton.com/input14.Gesture.pdf2. Black, A. (2010). Gen Y: Who they are and how they learn. Educational
Horizons, 88(2), 92-101.3. Cavanaugh, C., & Cavanaugh, T. (2008). eBooks in higher education.
Retrieved March, 2010, from http://drscavanaugh.org/ebooks/ebookhe.html
4. Chen, Q., Georganas, N. D., & Petriu, E. M. (2007). Real-time vision-based hand gesture recognition using Haar-like features. Instrumentation and Measurement. University of Ottawa.
5. Deutsch, N. (2004). Future trends in educational technology. University of Phoenix. Retrieved March, 2010, from http://www.nelliemuller.com/Future_Trends_in_Educational_%20Technology.htm
6. EUROPA. (2009, May 12). Smart chips with big potential: New EU recommendations make sure 21st century bar codes respect privacy, [Press Release]. Brussels.
1. Billinghurst, M. (2009). Gesture based interaction. Haptic Input (pp. 1-34). Retrieved from http://billbuxton.com/input14.Gesture.pdf
2. Black, A. (2010). Gen Y: Who they are and how they learn. Educational Horizons, 88(2), 92-101.
3. Cavanaugh, C., & Cavanaugh, T. (2008). eBooks in higher education. Retrieved March, 2010, from http://drscavanaugh.org/ebooks/ebookhe.html
4. Chen, Q., Georganas, N. D., & Petriu, E. M. (2007). Real-time vision-based hand gesture recognition using Haar-like features. Instrumentation and Measurement. University of Ottawa.
5. Deutsch, N. (2004). Future trends in educational technology. University of Phoenix. Retrieved March, 2010, from http://www.nelliemuller.com/Future_Trends_in_Educational_%20Technology.htm
6. EUROPA. (2009, May 12). Smart chips with big potential: New EU recommendations make sure 21st century bar codes respect privacy, [Press Release]. Brussels.
7. Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
8. Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2010). The 2010 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
9. Ketelhut, D. J., & Niemi, S. M. (2007). Emerging technologies in education and training: Applications for the laboratory animal science community. ILAR Journal, 48(2), 163-9.
10. Larson, L. C. (2009). e-Reading and e-responding: New tools for the next generation of readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53(3), 255-8. Doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.3.7
11. Lee, J. (2010, February 15). You, too, can soon be like Tom Cruise in ‘Minority Report’. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/you-too-can-soon-be-like-tom-cruise-in-minority-report/
12. Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: A study at the university of Denver. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(3), 285-99.
7. Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
8. Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2010). The 2010 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
9. Ketelhut, D. J., & Niemi, S. M. (2007). Emerging technologies in education and training: Applications for the laboratory animal science community. ILAR Journal, 48(2), 163-9.
10. Larson, L. C. (2009). e-Reading and e-responding: New tools for the next generation of readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53(3), 255-8. Doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.3.7
11. Lee, J. (2010, February 15). You, too, can soon be like Tom Cruise in ‘Minority Report’. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/you-too-can-soon-be-like-tom-cruise-in-minority-report/
12. Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: A study at the university of Denver. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(3), 285-99.
13. Long, A. C., Landay, J. A., & Rowe, L. A. (1998). PDA and gesture use in practice: Insights for designers of pen-based user interfaces. University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley, CA.
14. Molnar, D., & Wagner, D. (2004). Privacy and security in library RFID issues, practices, and architectures. ACM Comference on Communications and Computer Security, 210-19.
15. Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-books in higher education: Nearing the end of the era of hype? EDUCAUSE Review, 43(2).
16. Prabhu, M. T. (2009). Open courseware gains momentum. eSchool News. Retrieved March, 2010, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2009/12/31/the-push-for-open-source-courseware/
17. The New Media Consortium [TNMC] (2009). 2010 horizon report preview. NMC Horizon Project: 2010 preview, 1-6.
13. Long, A. C., Landay, J. A., & Rowe, L. A. (1998). PDA and gesture use in practice: Insights for designers of pen-based user interfaces. University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley, CA.
14. Molnar, D., & Wagner, D. (2004). Privacy and security in library RFID issues, practices, and architectures. ACM Comference on Communications and Computer Security, 210-19.
15. Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-books in higher education: Nearing the end of the era of hype? EDUCAUSE Review, 43(2).
16. Prabhu, M. T. (2009). Open courseware gains momentum. eSchool News. Retrieved March, 2010, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2009/12/31/the-push-for-open-source-courseware/
17. The New Media Consortium [TNMC] (2009). 2010 horizon report preview. NMC Horizon Project: 2010 preview, 1-6.
18. Starkman, N. (2007). Displays: Entering a new dimension. T.H.E. Journal, 34(5), 24-29.
19. Ward, M., van Kranenburg, R., & Backhouse, G. (2006). RFID: Frequency, standards, adoption, and innovation. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, 1-36.
20. Young, J. R. (2009). 6 lessons one campus learned about e-textbooks. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(39).
21. http://civeselib.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/what-are-your-views-on-e-books/http://civeselib.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/what-are-your-views-on-e-books/
22. http://thehottestgadgets.com/technology/futuristic23.
http://www.textually.org/picturephoning/archives/cat_barcode_technologies_rfid_tags_nfc.htm
24. http://www.njwomenshistory.org/topics.html25. http://www.gearlive.com/index.php/news/article/irex-iliad-e-reader-
02281234/26. http://www.icst.net/de/forschung/projekte/musical-gesture/
18. Starkman, N. (2007). Displays: Entering a new dimension. T.H.E. Journal, 34(5), 24-29.
19. Ward, M., van Kranenburg, R., & Backhouse, G. (2006). RFID: Frequency, standards, adoption, and innovation. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, 1-36.
20. Young, J. R. (2009). 6 lessons one campus learned about e-textbooks. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(39).
21. http://civeselib.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/what-are-your-views-on-e-books/http://civeselib.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/what-are-your-views-on-e-books/
22. http://thehottestgadgets.com/technology/futuristic23.
http://www.textually.org/picturephoning/archives/cat_barcode_technologies_rfid_tags_nfc.htm
24. http://www.njwomenshistory.org/topics.html25. http://www.gearlive.com/index.php/news/article/irex-iliad-e-reader-
02281234/26. http://www.icst.net/de/forschung/projekte/musical-gesture/
27. http://www.sagedata.com/the_company/
28. http://www.epapercentral.com/nw-missouri-state-university-replaces-textbooks-with-e-books.htm
29. http://www.insightts.com/blog/?m=20090824
30. http://wowio.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/x61t-and-ebooks-big1.jpg
31. http://ready-up.net/2009/06/22/a-question-of-control/
32. http://usc-characteranimation.blogspot.com/
33. http://blog.digsmarter.com/tag/gesture-based-interface/
34. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080616101137.htm
35. http://www.indiamart.com/company/1812806/products.html
27. http://www.sagedata.com/the_company/
28. http://www.epapercentral.com/nw-missouri-state-university-replaces-textbooks-with-e-books.htm
29. http://www.insightts.com/blog/?m=20090824
30. http://wowio.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/x61t-and-ebooks-big1.jpg
31. http://ready-up.net/2009/06/22/a-question-of-control/
32. http://usc-characteranimation.blogspot.com/
33. http://blog.digsmarter.com/tag/gesture-based-interface/
34. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080616101137.htm
35. http://www.indiamart.com/company/1812806/products.html
