6 29 2015 Order Denying Cert
of 2
-
Upload
north-suburban-republican-forum -
Category
Documents
-
view
411 -
download
0
description
TABOR Committee members and TABOR friends,We regret to inform you that the TABOR Foundation lost the Bridge Enterprise case. The Court of Appeals concluded that the tax could still be designated a fee if it was likely the payer could use a bridge in the future. The only step left to us in the judicial system was for the Colorado Supreme Court to recognize the fallacy of that conclusion and overturn the Appellate Court. The Supreme Court selects the cases it will hear and yesterday declined to allow the case to proceed any further. The TABOR Committee Board believed the case was eminently win-able. The state government's scheme was so obviously a subterfuge to get around TABOR; the structure and premises so blatantly dishonest that we could not foresee any judge allowing it to proceed. The practical consequence of the loss is that the fiction will continue that you incur a toll when you cross a bridge and that you pay your tolls every year with your car registration tax. The "Bridge Enterprise" will continue to operate as if it were a business, but do so inside the Colorado Department of Transportation. It performs what is historically a government function, uses the Colorado Transportation Commission as its board of directors and the Department director as its executive director. It will mean that the made-up entity can continue to move government revenues off-budget and eventually place Colorado citizens in debt for about $1 billion off-budget, without prior voter approval. What a travesty. The only possible resolution at this point is political. That is, a conservative governor and a legislature that adheres to constitutional primacy and respects the spirit of TABOR would have to take office. That rare alignment could conceivably reverse the statutes that put this rotten system into place. With Hickenlooper having just started a second term, that vision is a long time from even being considered. After nearly half a year waiting on legal developments, we have seen three major actions in as many business days. Please look for another report from your TABOR Committee very soon. Penn PfiffnerTABOR Committee Chairmanhttp://thetaborfoundation.org/tabor-foundation-vs-bridge-enterprise-lawsuit/
Transcript of 6 29 2015 Order Denying Cert
-
Colorado Supreme Court 2 East 14th Avenue Denver, CO 80203
Certiorari to the Court of Appeals, 2013CA1621 District Court, City & County of Denver, 2012CV3113
Petitioner: TABOR Foundation, a Colorado non-profit corporation, v. Respondents: Colorado Bridge Enterprise; Colorado Transportation Commission; and Douglas Aden, Heather Barry, Kathy Connell, Kathy Gilliland, Les Gruen, Gilbert Ortiz, Steve Parker, Trey Rogers, Gary M. Reiff, and Edward J. Peterson, all in their Official Capacities as members of the Colorado Transportation Commission.
Supreme Court Case No: 2014SC766
ORDER OF COURT
Upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Colorado
Court of Appeals and after review of the record, briefs, and the judgment of said
Court of Appeals,
IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Writ of Certiorari shall be, and the
same hereby is, DENIED.
JUSTICE EID WOULD GRANT as to the following issues:
Whether an involuntary bridge surcharge levied on vehicle registration is a tax or a TABOR-exempt fee when the vehicle does not cross bridges funded by the surcharge.
DATE FILED: June 29, 2015 CASE NUMBER: 2014SC766
-
Whether a TABOR-exempt enterprise must be operated as a self-supporting business and the transactions between the enterprise and customers must be market exchanges taking place in a competitive, arms-length manner.
Whether the General Assemblys definition of grant in section 24-77-102(7), C.R.S. (2014), correctly interpreted the purpose and meaning of TABOR.
BY THE COURT, EN BANC, JUNE 29, 2015. JUSTICE MARQUEZ does not participate.
