(562) 590-5071 W9b · 2019-04-19 · T3 T1 T2 T1 T2 T3 T6 T5 DISPENSER ISLANDS MW6 MW4 MW1 MW6 AS3...

STATE OF CALIFORNIA—NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast District Office 301 E. Ocean Blvd, Suite 300 Long Beach, CA 90802 (562) 590-5071

W9b

5-19-0181 (Community Corporation of Santa Monica)

May 8, 2019

Exhibits

Table of Contents

Exhibit 1 - Vicinity Map

Exhibit 2 – Site Plan

Exhibit 3 – Gas Station Site Plan

Exhibit 4 – Crain and Associates Parking Study

Project Location: Santa Monica, Los Angeles County

Project Site: 2120 Lincoln Blvd.

California Coastal Commission Exhibit 1

5-19-0181 Page 1 of 1

PATRICK TIGHE ARCHITECTURE5747 Venice BlvdLos Angeles, California 90019323.424.7594www.tighearchitecture.com

RENDERINGPACIFIC LINK2120 LINCOLN BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90405

01/ 16 / 2019

AA SUBMITTAL G002


5-19-0181 Page 1 of 5


RENDERINGPACIFIC LINK2120 LINCOLN BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90405

01/ 16 / 2019

AA SUBMITTAL G003


5-19-0181 Page 2 of 5

GROUND LEVEL

768 SFCOURTYARD

219 SFCOURTYARD

118 SFLAUNDRY ROOM

88 SFMANAGER OFFICE

111 SFMANAGER OFFICE

951 SFCOMMUNITY ROOM497 SF

COMMERCIAL

589 SFUNIT 101

463 SFUNIT 102

569 SFUNIT 103

973 SFUNIT 104

534 SFUNIT 105

73 SFTELECOM

111 SFELECTRICAL ROOM

SECOND LEVEL

1,007 SFUNIT 201

766 SFUNIT 202 514 SF

UNIT 203757 SF

UNIT 204536 SF

UNIT 205

565 SFUNIT 206

971 SFUNIT 207

543 SFUNIT 208

535 SFUNIT 209934 SF

UNIT 210

780 SFUNIT 211

THIRD LEVEL

1,007 SFUNIT 301

766 SFUNIT 302

514 SFUNIT 303

757 SFUNIT 304

536 SFUNIT 305

565 SFUNIT 306

971 SFUNIT 307

543 SFUNIT 308

535 SFUNIT 309

934 SFUNIT 310

780 SFUNIT 311

FOURTH LEVEL

1,007 SFUNIT 401

766 SFUNIT 402 514 SF

UNIT 403

757 SFUNIT 404

536 SFUNIT 405

964 SFUNIT 406

543 SFUNIT 407

535 SFUNIT 408

934 SFUNIT 409

780 SFUNIT 410 625 SF

COURTYARD

RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

FAR LEGEND


FAR CALCULATIONSPACIFIC LINK2120 LINCOLN BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90405

01/ 16 / 2019

AA SUBMITTAL G020

UNIT NO. TYPE UNIT SQFT

GROUND LEVELUNIT 101 1 BD 589 SFUNIT 102 1 BD 463 SFUNIT 103 1 BD 569 SFUNIT 104 3 BD 973 SFUNIT 105 1 BD 534 SF

SECOND LEVELUNIT 201 3 BD 1,007 SFUNIT 202 2 BD 766 SFUNIT 203 1 BD 514 SFUNIT 204 2 BD 757 SFUNIT 205 1 BD 536 SFUNIT 206 1 BD 565 SFUNIT 207 3 BD 971 SFUNIT 208 1 BD 543 SFUNIT 209 1 BD 535 SFUNIT 210 3 BD 934 SFUNIT 211 2 BD 780 SF

THIRD LEVELUNIT 301 3 BD 1,007 SFUNIT 302 2 BD 766 SFUNIT 303 1 BD 514 SFUNIT 304 2 BD 757 SFUNIT 305 1 BD 536 SFUNIT 306 1 BD 565 SFUNIT 307 3 BD 971 SFUNIT 308 1 BD 543 SFUNIT 309 1 BD 535 SFUNIT 310 3 BD 934 SFUNIT 311 2 BD 780 SF

FOURTH LEVELUNIT 401 3 BD 1,007 SFUNIT 402 2 BD 766 SFUNIT 403 1 BD 514 SFUNIT 404 2 BD 757 SFUNIT 405 1 BD 536 SFUNIT 406 3 BD 964 SFUNIT 407 1 BD 543 SFUNIT 408 1 BD 535 SFUNIT 409 3 BD 934 SFUNIT 410 2 BD 780 SF

26,281 SF

PRIVATE OPENSPACE

GROUND LEVEL99 SF61 SF61 SF63 SF63 SFSECOND LEVEL84 SF54 SF76 SF65 SF55 SF54 SF64 SF63 SF64 SF95 SF58 SFTHIRD LEVEL84 SF54 SF76 SF65 SF55 SF54 SF64 SF63 SF64 SF95 SF58 SFFOURTH LEVEL84 SF54 SF76 SF65 SF55 SF64 SF63 SF64 SF95 SF58 SF2,489 SF

UNIT MIX

TOTAL:

AREA CALCULATIONS PER ZONING CODE

TOTAL: 50

TOTAL PER ZONING CODE:

100%

Unit Type COUNT RATIO Avg. SF TOTAL SQFT

1 BD 18 48% 538 9,670 SF2 BD 9 24% 767 6,909 SF3 BD 10 27% 970.1 9,702 SF

26,281 SFLAUNDRY ROOM 118 SFMANAGER OFFICE 88 SFMANAGER OFFICE 111 SFCOMMUNITY ROOM 951 SFCOMMERCIAL 497 SFTELECOM 73 SFELECTRICAL ROOM 111 SFGENERAL TOTAL 1,948 SF28,196 SF


5-19-0181 Page 3 of 5

GROUND LEVEL79' - 0"

SECOND LEVEL89' - 0"

THIRD LEVEL99' - 0"

FOURTH LEVEL109' - 0"

STAIRWAY PENTHOUSE128' - 0"

ROOF LEVEL119' - 0"

AVG GRADE PLANE80' - 0"

BASEMENT LEVEL68' - 0"

PARAPET122' - 6"

8' -

2"

10%

20%

10%

SIDEWALK15' - 0" 28' - 6" 5' - 0" 50' - 0" 5' - 0"

2%PACIFIC AVE

PL PL

TRASH / RECYCLEBICYCLE ROOM

DRIVEWAY RAMP ENTRY

PARKING LEVEL10

' - 0

"

10' -

0"


PARKING RAMP DIAGRAMPACIFIC LINK2120 LINCOLN BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90405

01/ 16 / 2019

AA SUBMITTAL G023


5-19-0181 Page 4 of 5

GROUND LEVEL79' - 0"

SECOND LEVEL89' - 0"

THIRD LEVEL99' - 0"

FOURTH LEVEL109' - 0"

STAIRWAY PENTHOUSE128' - 0"

ROOF LEVEL119' - 0"

AVG GRADE PLANE80' - 0"

BASEMENT LEVEL68' - 0"

ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE124' - 6"

PARAPET122' - 6"

3' -

6"2'

- 0"

3' -

6"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"10

' - 0

"11

' - 0

"

9' -

0"39

' - 0

"

CPCP CP CP

CPCP

CP

CP

GW

SCSCSC SC SC SC

MATERIAL LEGENDCAST-ON-PLACE CONCRETE

LIGHT GREY CONCRETE PANELS

STEEL COLUMN

SMOOTH STL TROWELLED STUCCO - LIGHT GRAY

CORRUGATED METAL PANEL RAILING SNOWDRIFT WHITE

C

CP

SC

ST1

PM1


EAST ELEVATIONPACIFIC LINK2120 LINCOLN BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90405

01/ 16 / 2019

AA SUBMITTAL G500


5-19-0181 Page 5 of 5

PACIFIC ST.

LINC

OLN

BLVD

.

MW3A

MW3

MW9

VE4

VE3

VE1

VE2

T4T3

T1T2

T1

T2

T3

T6

T5

DISPENSERISLANDS

MW6

MW4MW1

MW6

AS3

AS5

AS4

AS1

AS2

MW2

CB2

CB3

CB4

CB1

B1

B4

B5

B3

B7

B2

B8

B6

B10

B11

B9

LP

LP

LP

LP

AREA OF IMPACTED SOIL(8,506 SQ. FT.)

\\aefs02\current\AE 2018\Projects 2018\98360 Projects 2018\9836003911_2120 Lincoln Bl Santa Monica CA 90405\05 9836003911_Reports\YYYY-MM PII Rpt\02 CAD\9836003911_SitePlan

FIGURE

LEGEND

DT:

PN:

CB:DB:

9/19/20189836003911

2JE JS

PROPERTY LINELP

SUBJECT STRUCTURE SITE PLAN

N

0

APPROX. SCALE: 1"=

20'

20'

10'

MW8 DPE AND GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL

MW9 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

AS5 AIR-SPARING WELLVAPOR EXTRACTION WELLVE4

SOIL CONFIRMATIONSAMPLE BORING LOCATIONCB4

ANGLED VAPOREXTRACTION WELLVE1

APPROX. LOC. OFEXISTING USTAPPROX. LOC.OF FORMER UST

T3

T4

EXISTING PVCREMEDIATION PIPE

EXISTING AS PIPE

2120 LINCOLN BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CA 90405

B11 SOIL BORING LOCATION

(8,625 SQ. FT.)

ESTIMATED


5-19-0181 Page 1 of 1

300 Corpora

Transportation Plan

Commundemand Lincoln Bapartmenthe commparking pthe Califoprovide pLincoln 1provided California

The Pacmake theincome demand Generatihousehoas “a vedemand areas. comprehrevieweddemand,Californiaaccountecriteria fo

Below is units paCaliforniaalternativ

ate Pointe, Suite

ning / Traffic Engineering

LowOn

nity Corporatrates for the

Boulevard in nt units whicmercial use. provided adjaornia Coastaparking at a 00% Affordaby the Linco

a Coastal Co

cific Link Line Project difffamilies andliterature d

on, 3rd Editld income, ery significanfor apartmeOur furthe

ensively stud in this me alternative a Governmeed for on apor an applica

a summary rking provisa Governmeve mode ava

470 | Culver City

Lincolnw-Income R

Personal V

tion of Santae Lincoln 100

Santa Monich meets the

The Projecacent to the al Commissirate of 2.0 sable Housinoln 100% Afommission r

ncoln 100% ferent from td is a Trandoes not fution nor ULeven thoughnt factor”. Aents in subuer research

udied as a vmorandum mode availa

ent Code reqplicable proj

able project.

of studies osion and utent Code coailability.

y, CA | 90230

n 100% AffoRestriction Vehicle Ow

a Monica ha0% Affordabica. The Proe City of Sanct will also clo

site. The aon (CCC) ty

spaces per ug Project. Tffordable Horecommenda

Affordable Htypical housnsit Orienteully accountLI Shared Ph the ITE PaAlso, ITE Paurban areash determinevariable in pand illustratability, and iquires that trjects. The L

of existing artilization daoncerning ve

Ph 310-473-650

ordable Hoand Trans

wnership a

s retained Cble Housing Poject will pronta Monica pose existingggregate pa

ypically recomunit, which wThis memoraousing Projecation for hou

Housing Proing projects

ed Developmt for these Parking conarking Genearking Genes than in ured that pepredicting petes that therncome leve

ransit proximLincoln 100%

rea affordabata, academehicle owne

08 Fx 310-444

ousing Prosit Availabiand Parkin

Crain & AssoProject prop

ovide 28 parkparking requi driveways a

arking ratio ismmends hou

would be 74 pandum examct would be

using is appr

oject contain. The Projement (TOD)

two variabntain parkineration does ration, 3rd E

rban areas ersonal vehersonal vehire are stron

el. Due to thmity and hous% Affordable

le housing smic researchership/parkin

4-9771 www.c

oject ility Effectsg Demand

ociates to revposed to be lking spaces irements, pluand increases 0.75 spaceusing in the parking spac

mines whethetypical, and

ropriate for t

ns two charect provides ) project. Sbles. Neithg demand consider ho

Edition showand does n

hicle ownericle usage.

ng linkages he documensehold income Housing P

sites, the emh and modng demand

March 12

crainandassociat

s d

view the parlocated at 21for 37

us one space the on-strees per unit aCoastal Areces for the er the housinif the typicahis project.

racteristics whousing to

Standard paher ITE Parates base

ousehold incws higher panot address rship has That literatubetween pa

nted linkagesme thresholdProject meet

mpirical afforddifications toand income

2, 2019

tes.com

rking 120

ce for eet and ea

ng al

which lower

arking arking ed on come

arking rural been

ure is arking s, the ds be ts the

dable o the e and


5-19-0181 Page 1 of 20

300 Corpora

Transportation Plann

Santa M

-Commuvariety oand opewhich incproject sparking smile, rapoccupiedon-site p

As TableProject. all are wiservice dby two ex

City of L

The City housing family holocationsratio of 0approximwithin 1/2routes sein the peaverage utilizationwhether Documen

ate Pointe, Suite


onica Affor

nity Corporaf locations trates a portcludes over

site and all spaces per upid transit std. Table 1 sarking provid

e 1 shows, thAs this tableithin ½ to 1 m

directly adjacxpress trans

Los Angeles

of Los Angelocations thr

ousing, similas and 72% of.84 parking

mately the sa2 mile walk derving the stoak hours forratio is the sn lower thanor not they antation from

470 | Culver City

rdable Hous

ation of Santhroughout Stfolio of over 100 buildinfour sites p

unit. All fourtops within ½summarizes ded and nea

hese nearby e shows, althmile of a Mecent to the Psit lines.

s Affordable

eles Departmroughout thear to the Prof the spacesspaces bein

ame whetherdistance fromop every 15 r the Family same as for the averageare within mthe study is

y, CA | 90230

sing Sites

nta Monica oSanta Monicer 1,700 houngs. Four oprovide less r sites are w½ mile, andthe Project

arby transit:.

affordable hhough these

etro ExpositioProject site.

e Housing S

ment of Trane City of Los oject. An aves are utilizedng utilized atr or not the sm stops for tminutes or affordable lothe Project. e. The studyixed use are

s provided in

Ph 310-473-650

2

operates facca. Commuusing units of the sites

than the pwell served bd an Expo r

and four ne

housing unit e existing siteon Train LineThe Project

Sites

nsportation hAngeles. F

erage of 1.1 at the peakt the peak. Tsite is within transit routesless). Howeocations with Many of the

y does not dieas or high d Appendix A

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

cilities with aunity Corporof affordabare in clos

proposed proby transit (harail station wearby housin

sites provides also prove station, theis within 1/4

has conducteFourteen (147 parking sp

k occupancy The parking a transit pri

s with peak ever, the triphin, rather the 14 individuifferentiate bdensity areasA.

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

affordable horation of Sanle housing e proximity oject’s parkave local trawithin 1 mileng sites in t

de less parkivide good traere is higher4 mile of a tr

ed analyses 4) of the locapaces is protime. This cprovision anority area (afrom the com

p generation han outside, ual sites havbetween sites, such as th

ransit ConsiderMarch 12

P

crainandassociat

ousing unitsnta Monicain Santa Moto the prop

king ratio of ansit stops we), and areterms of loca

ng than the ansit servicer quality tranransit hub se

at 42 affordations providvided at the correspondsnd utilizationa TPA is the mbined transrates are loa TPA. The

ve a rate of es based on he Project s

rations 2 2019 Page 2

tes.com

s at a owns onica

posed 0.75

with ¼ e fully ation,

e and nsit erved

dable e 14

s to a n are area sit

ower e

ite.


5-19-0181 Page 2 of 20

300 Corpora


Comp

Site

Projec(2120

LincolnBlvd.)

2402-24KansasAvenue

2112-21DelawaAvenue

217-22BickneAvenue

2122 PicBouleva

ate Pointe, Suite


Nearby C

parable Loca

NumbUni

ct n )

37 A

10 s e

10 A

21 re e

38 A

3 ell e

13 A

co ard

8 Ap

470 | Culver City

Community

ations with

ber of its

A

PaSp

pt.s 28 S

pt.s 6 S

pt.s 14 S

pt.s 8 S

pt.s 5 S

y, CA | 90230

Corporatio

Fewer Park

Amount of P

arking paces

Spaces

Spaces 0.

Spaces

Spaces

Spaces

Ph 310-473-650

3

Table 1

n of Santa

king Spaces

Parking

Ratio

0.75 Sp./Unit

6 Sp./Unit

0.37 Sp./Unit

0.62 Sp./Unit

0.63 Sp./Unit

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

Monica Affo

s Provided

Transit LWa

< ¼ Mile

BBB 3, R3,7, R7

BBB 7

BBB 16, 41, 42, 43

BBB 1, 2. 35, 8, 9, 18

Expo 33, 733

BBB 7, R7,16, 41, 42,

43

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

ordable Hou

per Unit tha

Lines With Salking Dista

¼ - ½ M

, BBB 1, 5, 9, 18

BBB R716,

BBB 7, R

8 BBB 7, R

,

BBB 44


P

crainandassociat

using

an the Proje

Stops Withiance of:

ile ½ - 1

2, 8

Metro Rail, additibus li

7, Metro Rail, additibus li

R7 Metro Rail, additibus li

R7 Metro Rail, additibus li

4 Metro Rail, additibus li


tes.com

ect

n a

Mile

Expo and onal ines

Expo and onal ines

Expo and onal ines

Expo and onal ines

Expo and onal ines


5-19-0181 Page 3 of 20

300 Corpora


Typical P

Parking dcross-claprojects parking sare disagunits areDifferent utilizationconsiderpersonal (includinggreater v

Typicallylocation. units. A paramete

The use exercise of affordaareas ouareas. Lrequirem

Vehicle O

A reviewrelevant Model,” TMarylandaccompa

ate Pointe, Suite


Parking Dem

demand for assified with in Los Angespaces per dggregated bae required t

rates are n of differenting that morvehicle own

g retail and variety and fr

y, jurisdiction A buildingproject loc

ers are typic

of these licontrol over

able units anutside centraLikewise, aff

ments attache

Ownership

w of the parmodel dev

The Nationad, Cinzia Canying text:

470 | Culver City

mand Cons

a developmdifferent ratles (outside dwelling unitased on dweto provide 1also applie

t rates for difre alternativnership and restaurants

requency of

nal parking permit is ty

cation cannocally used to

mited variabr a number ond provisional city cores,fordable houed to project

by Locatio

rking demaneloped by al Center foirillo, PhD,

y, CA | 90230

siderations

ment project tes for differthe Central

t. However,elling unit siz1, 1.5, and d to differefferent settin

ve mode optparking les

s as well astransit servi

requiremenypically requot be modifestablish re

bles has beof additionals of transit f increasing using incentts utilizing th

n

nd literaturethe Univers

or Smart GroMarch 201

Ph 310-473-650

4

is usually prrent categoriBusiness D

, the parkingze. Studio, o2 parking

ent settings/ngs/locationstions are uss desirable.

s work sitesces.

nts were bauired for mofied without

equirements.

ecome out-ol pertinent vafacilities). Tthe need fo

tives are mohose incentiv

regarding vsity of Maryowth Resea0). The s

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

redicted by aies. For exa

District [CBD]g demands fone-bedroomspaces per/locations, ss was adopt

sually availab The option

s) within wa

sed on twoodifications t a building.

of-date. Loariables for ransit systemr specific pa

ore heavily uves.

vehicle ownyland in 20arch and Edstudy contai

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

a single varample, all fo]) are requirefor rental rem, and two or dwelling usuch as in ed in the Citble in densens include hlking distan

o factors – to the numb

g permit. T

ocal jurisdictcertain projems have imparking requirutilized, with

nership by l10 (“Autom

ducation at ins the follo


P

crainandassociat

iable, sometor-sale resideed to providesidential proor more bed

unit, respectthe CBD.

ty of Los Anger areas, ma

having more ce, as well

project sizeber of resideTherefore, t

tions are abects (i.e., nuproved servirements for h State and

ocation shomobile Owne

the Universowing table


tes.com

times ential e two ojects room tively. The geles aking uses as a

e and ential these

ble to mber ice to more local

ows a ership sity of e and


5-19-0181 Page 4 of 20

300 Corpora


As thesehouseholength tomodes). alternativreliance odevelopmBird and reduction

Vehicle O

It is also decision Organizavehicle o

An examhousehoarticle (“Automob

ate Pointe, Suite


e data show,ld in rural a

o one’s des The pede

ves to privaon alternativ

ments in rideSpin), as w

n in the num

Ownership

well documeof how man

ations (MPOownership by

mple of MPO ld income oUsing 1990

bile Owners

470 | Culver City

Un

Correlati

there is lesareas. Thisstination (maestrian, bicytely owned

ve modes (ae-hailing app

well as bike sber of vehic

by Income

ented that hny vehicles ts) utilize an

y household

transportation vehicle o0 Census Phip Models,

y, CA | 90230

niversity of

on of Locat

ss than 1 cars differential aking walkinycling, and

vehicles innd not needps (such as sharing (sucles owned b

ousehold incto own for thnual househsub-models

on model anownership i

Public Use M,” Charles L

Ph 310-473-650

5

Table 2

Maryland 2

tion and Ve

r per househreflects bo

ng, bicyclingtransit syste urban enving to own afor Uber anh as the Me

by the typica

come is a prheir househohold income s of their trav

nalytical resen CaliforniaMicrodata SL. Purvis, T

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

2010 Study

ehicle Owne

hold in urbanoth that highg, and transems are co

vironments, and park a pd Lyft) and

etro programl urban hous

rimary factoold. In part as an inputvel demand

earch that dia is a TransSample To Transportatio

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

ership

n areas versher density sit more feaorrespondingthereby furt

personal vehmotorized s

m) will likely rsehold.

r in an indiviicular, Metrot variable wiforecasting

irectly meassportation REstimate Don Researc


P

crainandassociat

sus 2.33 carshortens theasible alterngly more usther encoura

hicle). The rescooters (sucresult in a fu

idual’s or famopolitan Planthin the persmodels.

sures the effeResearch ReDemographicch Record 1


tes.com

rs per e trip native sable aging ecent ch as urther

mily’s nning sonal

ect of ecord c and 1443,


5-19-0181 Page 5 of 20

300 Corpora


1994). Tverses ho

As the abas manyvehicle hone-vehi

The 201incomes househoown a vefrom lessto over 7$50,000.displays

ate Pointe, Suite


That article eousehold inc

Co

bove table sy vehicles ashouseholds cle househo

0 Universitylower than

ld income cehicle. Likes than 11 pe72 percent fo The folloconnection

470 | Culver City

examined thecome, and it

Tr

rrelation of

shows, per 1s high incomin these reg

olds and less

y of Maryla $10,000, mategory of $wise, the nu

ercent for theor each annuwing figure between ann

y, CA | 90230

e 1990 censt contained t

ransportatio

f Household

1990 censusme householgions had ans than 30 pe

nd study fomore than h$50,000 or mumber of hoe two annuaual househo

from the Mnual househ

Ph 310-473-650

6

sus data infothe following

Table 3

on Researc

d Income an

s data, low inlds in the Ban average h

ercent of two

ound similarhalf did notmore, less thouseholds wal householdld income caMaryland stuhold income

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

ormation on hg table:

ch Record

nd Vehicle O

ncome housay Area andhousehold ino-plus vehicle

r results. Ft own anyhan 2 perce

with two-plus income catategory that udy summaand vehicle

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

household v

Ownership

seholds ownd San Diegoncome of lee household

For househovehicles. F

ent of the ho vehicles inctegories of lewas equal t

arizes the downership i


P

crainandassociat

vehicle owne

ned less thano. Further,ss 60 perce

ds.

olds with anFor each anouseholds dicreased steess than $10to or greaterdata and visincreases:


tes.com

ership

n half zero-

ent of

nnual nnual d not adily, 0,000 r than sually


5-19-0181 Page 6 of 20

300 Corpora


AB744 P

In Octobincrease traveled gas emislocations

The Calidemand provisionparking s

ate Pointe, Suite


Co

Parking Req

ber 2015, Asthe density (VMT) on C

ssions, but cs, including t

fornia legislwith locatio

ns allowing isupply requir

470 | Culver City

Un

rrelation of

quirements

ssembly Bilof affordabl

California roacontributes tohe beaches

lature and Gon and houncreased derements for

y, CA | 90230

F

niversity of

f Household

Modificatio

l No. 744 (Ae housing inads. Exceso traffic congand other c

Governor cousehold incoensity for inaffordable h

Ph 310-473-650

7

Figure 1

Maryland 2

d Income an

on

AB744) wasn urban areass VMT not gestion. Thoastal facilit

onsidered thome in devcome-restric

housing proje

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

2010 Study

nd Vehicle O

s adopted bas, and thereonly increaat traffic conties.

he correlatioveloping ABcted housingects.

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

Ownership

by the Stateeby reduce ses the levengestion can

on of the amB744. In ag, AB744 al


P

crainandassociat

e of Californthe vehicle el of greenhn block acce

mount of paaddition to lows for red


tes.com

nia to miles

house ess to

arking other

duced


5-19-0181 Page 7 of 20

300 Corpora


AB744 aproject:

(3rehodvth(AtrPtrs

The projprovide Housing legislaturcan be reso requeincentive.5, but infor 1BD a

Interpret

The interin the Casigned in

ItSdCthSis

ate Pointe, Suite


adds text to SAB744 also

3) Notwithental unitsousing cosf the Healteveloper, aehicular pahat exceedA) If the deransit stopublic Resoransit stop paces per

ects addreslow incomeProject. Th

re and approequired for tested by thees into their pn practice, thand .75 for 2

tation of the

rpretation of alifornia leg

nto law by th

t is the inteSection 659icta in Kaln

Cal.App.5thhe Californ

Section 300s that the t

470 | Culver City

Section 659includes the

standing p, exclusivest to lower th and Safea city, counarking ratiods the followevelopmen, as defineurces Code from the dunit.

ssed by this housing, bherefore, peoved by thehe Lincoln 1

e developer. planning codhey require a2-3BD

e California

f the Californislature. ABe California

ent of the L915 of the Gnel Gardenh 927 regaria Coastal

000) of the two statute

y, CA | 90230

915 of the Ce following la

aragraph ( of a mana income famety Code, tnty, or cityo, inclusivewing ratiosnt is locatedd in subdive, and therdevelopme

section muboth of whicer the modife Governor, 100% Afford

The City odes. In theora higher rati

a Coastal Ac

nia Coastal AB2797 addreGovernor.

LegislatureGovernmen

ns, LLC v. Crding the re Act of 197 Public Res

es be harm

Ph 310-473-650

8

alifornia Govanguage:

(1), if a devager’s unit milies, as pthen, upon y and counte of handicas: d within onvision (b) ore is unobstent, the rat

ust be Transch are applfied Californno more thaable Housinof Santa Mory the Projeco, their zon

ct and AB74

Act and AB7esses the cIn Section 1

e in amendnt Code to City of Los elationship

76 (Divisionsources Coonized so

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

vernment C

velopment or units, wprovided in the requety shall noapped and

ne-half mileof Section 2tructed acc

tio shall not

sit Orientedlicable to thia Governman 0.5 park

ng Project byonica has sect is eligible ing ordinanc

44

744 has beeconsistency , AB2797 st

ing subdiv address thAngeles (2

p between Sn 20 (commde). The Las to achie

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

ode that is a

t consists swith an affon Section 5st of the t impose a guest par

e of a majo21155 of tcess to thet exceed 0

Developmehe Lincoln 1

ment Code aking spaces y the City of electively apfor the not t

ce for this p

en an issue issue, and

tates

ision (m) ohe holding 2016) 3 Section 65mencing wiegislature’eve the goa


P

crainandassociat

applicable to

solely of ordable 0052.5

a king,

or he e major .5

ents (TODs)100% Afford

as passed bper dwelling

f Santa Monpplied the Ato exceed raroject requir

in the courtswas passed

of and

915 and ith ’s intent al of


tes.com

o this

) and dable

by the g unit ica, if

AB744 atio of res .5

s and d and


5-19-0181 Page 8 of 20

300 Corpora


ina

Per the CommissaffordablAct be costandardProject.

Conclus

Substantutilizationparking dlevel. Rrestrictiotransit-orincome aBoulevar

The devehousing. addition, 50% of pis in exce

It should the Califwithin wconnecteProject wand elimmore paLincoln 1surroundnear the access.

ate Pointe, Suite


ncreasing tlso protect

direction of sion to intee housing ponsidered tos. In particu

sions

tial empirican, census ademand, is h

Recognizing ns on the ariented deveand locatedrd, which qua

eloper is co The projeas per regu

project financess of local z

be noted thfornia coast

walking/bicyced to coastawill improve

minating severking space

100% Affordding streets.

coast, the L

470 | Culver City

the supply ting coasta

the Californerpret the Cprojects nearo be in harmular, parking

al evidence and other rehighly correthese facts,mount of paelopments. d within onealifies as a M

omplying witect is providulations thatcing, the devzoning requi

at the Lincoin two resp

cling distancal facilities v

the project eral drivewaes as estimadable HousinRather, conLincoln 100%

y, CA | 90230

of affordabl resources

nia legislatuCalifornia Cr transit. Th

mony with theg incentives

and academeal world dlated with b, the Califorarking that c The Linco

e-half mile oMajor Transi

th local zonding 150% ot govern Lowvelopment wirements.

oln 100% Affpects. The ce of the cvia transit.

site by impays, therebyated by Cityng Project issidering the% Affordable

Ph 310-473-650

9

ble housings and coast

ure, it is theCoastal Act

e legislaturee AB744 proare critical f

mic researchdata showsoth project l

rnia legislatucould be reqln 100% Afof the intersit Stop.

ing and excof the Statew Income H

would be pen

fordable HouProject wil

coast and tAdditionally

proving the ry increasing y of Santa s not anticip increased he Housing P

Parking Dem

08 Fx 310-444

g in the coatal access.

e responsibilas allowing

e has directeovisions, whfor the Linco

h based onthat vehicle

location andure passedquired by locffordable Hosection of P

ceeding Stae mandated Housing Tax nalized for a

using Projecl increase tthe affordab

y, the Lincolroadway syscurbside pa

Monica stafpated to havhousing andProject as pr

mand Income/Tr

4-9771 www.c

astal zone

lity of the Cg for incened that the Chich include oln 100% Aff

parking proe ownership

d average hoand the Gocal agenciesousing ProjPico Boulev

ate regulatiomaximum Credits, wh

ny parking s

ct will also inthe affordabble housingn 100% Affstem adjacearking by anff (see Attacve spillover added parkroposed will


P

crainandassociat

while

California Contives to proCalifornia Comodified pafordable Ho

ovisions, pap, and therousehold inc

overnor apprs for low-incect is both

vard and Li

ns for affordrequirement

hich providestall provided

crease acceble housing g base whicfordable Hoent to the prn estimatedchment B).parking ont

king it will prol improve co


tes.com

oastal ovide

oastal arking using

arking refore come roved come,

low-ncoln

dable t. In over d that

ess to base ch is using roject 5 or The o the ovide

oastal


5-19-0181 Page 9 of 20

300 Corpora

Transportation Plan

ate Pointe, Suite


Tri

470 | Culver City

LA

ip Genera

y, CA | 90230

Atta

ADOT Aff

ation and

Ph 310-473-650

achment A

fordable H

d Parking

08 Fx 310-444

A

Housing

Utilizatio

4-9771 www.c

on Study

March 12

crainandassociat

2, 2019

tes.com California Coastal Commission

Exhibit 4 5-19-0181

Page 10 of 20

600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1050, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 261-3050

www.fehrandpeers.com

MEMORANDUM

Date: April 20, 2017

To: Claire Bowin & David Somers, Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Cc: Tom Carranza, Los Angeles Department of Transportation

From: Tom Gaul & Cary Bearn, Fehr & Peers

Subject: Infill and Complete Streets Study

Task 2.1A Local Affordable Housing Trip Generation Study

Ref: LA15-2755

This memo serves as a summary of Task 2.1A, Local Affordable Housing Trip Generation Study, as

part of the City of Los Angeles’ Infill and Complete Streets: Capturing VMT Impacts & Benefits

Pursuant to CEQA study. As part of Task 2.1A, vehicle trip generation and parking utilization surveys

were conducted at numerous affordable housing locations throughout the City of Los Angeles in

order to provide an improved understanding of vehicle trip generation and parking

utilization characteristics of affordable housing uses in Los Angeles.

The empirical trip generation data collected through this effort will be used to customize and

calibrate the MXD model for Los Angeles to be integrated into the vehicle miles traveled (VMT)

VMT Calculator to be developed for the City as part of later tasks in the study.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty-four hour driveway vehicle counts were conducted at the various survey sites using video

cameras. Manual overnight parking utilization sweeps were also conducted.

Criteria for selection of the survey sites included:

Sample Size – The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) recommends that at least

three and preferably five independent survey sites be used to establish a local trip

generation rate for a particular land use. This recommendation was exceeded for all land

use types included in this study, including for each of the subcategories of affordable

housing sites.

100% Affordable – The affordable housing site must be 100% affordable (other than the

manager’s unit). This was to ensure that the counts reflect the trip generation behavior

solely of affordable units.

Isolatable Use – The sites must be standalone and not part of a mixed-use development.


5-19-0181 Page 11 of 20

Claire Bowin & David Somers

April 20, 2017

Page 2

Countable Driveway(s) – Driveways must be serving parking lots for the use of the site and

not also serving parking lots for other land uses in the surrounding area.

Successful Development – The development should be mature, be located in a mature

environment, and appear to be economically healthy.

Permission of Property Owners/Managers – Permission was obtained in order to survey a

site.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING

Data Collection

Twenty-four hour driveway counts and overnight parking sweeps were conducted at a total of 42

affordable housing sites within the City of Los Angeles (35 sites counted in May-June 2016 and

seven additional sites counted in November 2016). The affordable housing study locations were

identified in consultation with the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning and the City of

Los Angeles Housing+Community Investment Department. The sites were categorized according

to two criteria considered to influence the level of vehicle ownership and tripmaking but also

considered to be available and applicable to future projects (i.e., measureable and able to be

determined using a readily available data source): proximity to transit and affordable housing type:

Proximity to Transit – The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has

defined “Transit Priority Areas” (TPAs) as the area within ½ mile of an existing major transit

stop, and defines a major transit stop as either a rail station or an intersection of 2 or more

major bus routes with peak service frequencies of 15 minutes or less. The transit priority

area defined by SCAG applies a ½ mile radial from the station or intersection. For this study,

a ½ mile walkshed along the transportation network was used in lieu of the ½ mile radius.

Additionally, stations for the Metro Orange Line and Silver Line Busways were not included

in the SCAG definition but were added as part of the rail stations. These busways provide

peak hour service less than 15 minutes and operate in dedicated rights-of-way. Study

locations were defined as either inside or outside a transit priority area. Twenty of the study

locations were within a TPA and 22 were outside of a TPA.

Housing Type – Affordable housing type was categorized as serving families, seniors,

special needs, or permanent supportive. Family affordable housing offers affordable

dwelling units designed for households with children. Senior affordable housing provides

affordable dwelling units designed for mature residents. The category of special needs

housing includes facilities serving a variety of populations, including foster youth, disabled,

mentally ill, and HIV/AIDs. Permanent supportive housing provides long-term housing with

supportive services designed to enable homeless persons and individuals/families at risk of

homelessness to ensure that they remain housed and live as independently as possible.

Fourteen of the study sites were designated as family housing, thirteen were senior, eight

were special needs, and seven were permanent supportive. Each of these categories were

divided roughly equally between sites within a TPA and sites outside of a TPA.


5-19-0181 Page 12 of 20


April 20, 2017

Page 3

Retail job density was also considered as a possible variable influencing tripmaking but, based on

exploratory data analysis and discussions with LADOT, the final trip generation analysis was

disaggregated based on proximity to transit and housing type only.

Table 1 presents the list of properties included in the analysis. Table 2 shows the aggregated vehicle

trip generation results based on proximity to transit and housing type. Table 2 also shows relevant

trip generation rates from ITE’s Trip Generation, 9th Edition, for comparison. Table 3 shows the

aggregated parking utilization results based on proximity to transit and housing type. For

comparison, Table 3 also shows relevant parking requirements from the Los Angeles Municipal

Code (LAMC).

Property managers for 36 of the 42 surveyed sites provided information regarding selected

characteristics of the sites. All of the respondents stated that they provide parking but do not charge

residents for parking on-site. None of the respondents provide partially or fully-subsidized transit

passes to residents, none provide car-share services, and one provides a shuttle to grocery stores.

Results

Reviewing Table 2, the following observations can be made:

The empirical vehicle trip generation rates across the affordable housing survey sites are

higher for the affordable family units relative to the senior, special needs, and permanent

supportive affordable units.

The empirical trip generation rates are generally lower for units located within a TPA than

for units located outside of a TPA.

The empirical trip generation rates averaged across all 42 of the affordable housing survey

sites are lower than the ITE trip rates for standard apartments for all three time periods

(daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour). This holds true as well for almost all of the

disaggregated subcategories (the sole exception being affordable family units outside of a

TPA during the AM peak hour).

Affordable family units both inside and outside of a TPA are the only categories with

empirical rates higher than the ITE high-rise apartment rates (an ITE category which

primarily consists of buildings within urban areas).

The empirical rates for senior, special needs, and permanent supportive affordable housing

are far lower than both the ITE apartment and ITE high-rise apartment rates.

The empirical rates for the senior affordable housing are lower than ITE rates for senior

adult housing.

Reviewing Table 3, the following observations can be made:

• The empirical parking utilization ratios are higher for the affordable family units relative

to the senior, special needs, and permanent supportive units.


5-19-0181 Page 13 of 20


April 20, 2017

Page 4

• The empirical parking utilization ratios for each of the sub-categorizations of the

affordable housing survey sites (by affordable housing type and by transit proximity) are

lower than the LAMC parking requirement for apartments.

• The empirical parking utilization ratios for family affordable housing range from 0.82 to

0.85 spaces per unit and are lower than the parking requirements under the LAMC

Affordable Housing Density Bonus Option 2 (LAMC 12.22A.25(d)(2)) for restricted

affordable units (1 space per unit).

• The empirical parking utilization ratios for senior, special needs, and permanent

supportive affordable housing range from 0.20 to 0.48 spaces per unit and are lower than

the parking requirements under the LAMC Affordable Housing Density Bonus

Option 2 (LAMC 12.22A.25(d)(2)) for units restricted to low or very low income senior

citizen or disabled (0.5 spaces per unit).

• The empirical parking utilization ratios are lower for units located within a TPA than for

units located outside of a TPA for the senior, special need, and permanent supportive

units but not for the family units.

SOURCES

Trip Generation, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012.

Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2014.

Los Angeles Municipal Code.


5-19-0181 Page 14 of 20

TABLE 1Affordable Housing Trip Generation and Parking Utilization Survey Locations

Count Name Address Transit Priority Area Housing Type1 Barnsdall Court 1632 N Normandie Ave, Hollywood, CA 90027 Inside Family2 Parkside Apartments 900 S Grand Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90015 Inside Family3 El Dorado Family Apts 12129 N El Dorado Ave, Los Angeles, CA 91342 Inside Family4 Union Point 420 Union Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Inside Family5 Coronita Family 204 S Lucas Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90026 Inside Family6 New Venice 1A 535 Santa Clara Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Inside Family7 New Venice 2C 1002 5th Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Inside Family8 Sichel Family Apts 1805 Sichel St, Los Angeles, CA 90031 Inside Family9 Bonnie Brae Village 208 S Bonnie Brae St, Los Angeles, CA 90057 Inside Permanent Supportive

10 Gower Street Apts 1140 N Gower St, Los Angeles, CA 90038 Inside Permanent Supportive11 The Villas At Gower 1726 N Gower St, Hollywood, CA 90028 Inside Permanent Supportive12 NoHo Seniors Villa 5525 Klump Ave, North Hollywood, CA 91601 Inside Seniors13 Morgan Place Senior Apts 7301 S Crenshaw Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90043 Inside Seniors14 Figueroa Senior Housing 7621 S Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90044 Inside Seniors15 Hollenbeck Terrace 610 S Saint Louis St, Los Angeles, CA 90023 Inside Seniors16 Ward Villas 1177 W Adams Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90007 Inside Seniors17 Vermont Manzanita 1225 S Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90006 Inside Special Needs18 New Carver 1624 S Hope St, Los Angeles, CA 90015 Inside Special Needs19 Charles Cobb Apts 521 S San Pedro St, Los Angeles, CA 90013 Inside Special Needs20 New Genesis 452 S Main St, Los Angeles, CA 90013 Inside Special Needs21 Rio Vista Apts 3000 N Verdugo Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90065 Outside Family22 New Venice 4B 915 7th Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Outside Family23 Cuatro Vientos 5331 E Huntington Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90032 Outside Family24 Lorena Terrace 611 South Lorena St, Los Angeles, CA 90023 Outside Family25 Laurel Village 9700 Laurel Canyon Blvd, Pacoima, CA 91331 Outside Family26 New Venice 2D 919 5th Ave, Venice, CA 90291 Outside Family27 Cornerstone Apts 14128 Calvert St, Van Nuys, CA 91401 Outside Permanent Supportive28 Willis Avenue Apts 14731 W Rayen St, Los Angeles, CA 91402 Outside Permanent Supportive29 PATH Villas At Del Rey 11734 Courtleigh Dr, CA 90066 Outside Permanent Supportive30 Winnetka Senior Apts 20750 Sherman Way, Los Angeles CA 91306 Outside Permanent Supportive31 TELACU Pointe 3100 Fletcher Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90065 Outside Seniors32 Asturias Senior Apts 9628 Van Nuys Blvd, Panorama City, CA 91402 Outside Seniors33 Cantabria Senior Apts 9640 N Van Nuys Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 91402 Outside Seniors34 TELACU Vista 4900 N Via Marisol, Highland Park, CA 90032 Outside Seniors35 Andalucia Senior Apts 15305 W Lanark St, Los Angeles, CA 91406 Outside Seniors36 TELACU Las Flores 12793 Mercer St, Pacoima, CA 91331 Outside Seniors37 Buckingham Sr. Housing 4020 S Buckingham Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90008 Outside Seniors38 Villa Valley 15950 Sherman Way, Los Angeles, CA 91406 Outside Seniors39 Allesandro Street Apts 1934 Allesandro St, Los Angeles, CA 90039 Outside Special Needs40 Innes Heights, Lp 1245 Innes Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90026 Outside Special Needs41 Woodland Terrace 15532 W Nordhoff St, North Hills, CA 91343 Outside Special Needs42 Guy Gabaldon Apts 3553 Beswick St, Los Angeles, CA 90023 Outside Special Needs


5-19-0181 Page 15 of 20

TABLE 2Vehicle Trip Rates for Affordable Housing Sites in Los Angeles

(By Transit Priority Area and Affordable Housing Type)Counts conducted May, June, and November 2016

TPA Area Affordable Housing Type Bin Sample SizeDaily Rate

(Trips per DU)

Average AM Peak Hour Rate

(Trips per DU)

AM Percent In

AM Percent Out

Average PM Peak Hour Rate

(Trips per DU)

PM Percent In

PM Percent Out

Inside - 20 2.32 0.26 40% 60% 0.20 56% 44%Outside - 22 2.48 0.25 46% 54% 0.24 52% 48%

- Family 14 4.16 0.52 38% 62% 0.38 55% 45%- Seniors 13 1.72 0.12 38% 62% 0.15 52% 48%- Special Needs 8 1.49 0.17 43% 57% 0.11 54% 46%- Permanent Supportive 7 1.23 0.08 67% 33% 0.13 53% 47%

Inside Family Inside, Family 8 4.16 0.49 37% 63% 0.35 56% 44%Inside Seniors Inside, Seniors 5 1.31 0.13 38% 62% 0.13 47% 53%Inside Special Needs Inside, Special Needs 4 1.00 0.10 30% 70% 0.05 67% 33%Inside Permanent Supportive Inside, Permanent Supportive 3 0.87 0.08 62% 38% 0.09 59% 41%

Outside Family Outside, Family 6 4.15 0.55 40% 60% 0.43 55% 45%Outside Seniors Outside, Seniors 8 1.97 0.11 38% 62% 0.17 55% 45%Outside Special Needs Outside, Special Needs 4 1.98 0.24 54% 46% 0.16 44% 56%Outside Permanent Supportive Outside, Permanent Supportive 4 1.50 0.09 71% 29% 0.16 49% 51%

ITE for Comparison

ITE Record Number Description Sample SizeDaily Rate

(Trips per DU)

Average AM Peak Hour Rate

(Trips per DU)

AM Percent In

AM Percent Out

Average PM Peak Hour Rate

(Trips per DU)

PM Percent In

PM Percent Out

ITE 220 Apartment 78-90 6.65 0.51 20% 80% 0.62 65% 35%ITE 222 High-Rise Apartment 9-17 4.20 0.30 25% 75% 0.35 61% 39%ITE 252 Senior Adult Housing-Attached 5-10 3.44 0.20 34% 66% 0.25 54% 46%ITE 253 Congregate Care Facility 2-3 2.02 0.06 59% 41% 0.17 55% 45%ITE 255 Continuing Care Retirement Community 4-6 2.40 0.14 65% 35% 0.16 39% 61%


5-19-0181 Page 16 of 20

TABLE 3

Parking Utilization Rates for Affordable Housing Sites in Los Angeles(By Transit Priority Area and Affordable Housing Type)

Surveys conducted May, June, and November 2016

TPA Area Affordable Housing Type Sample SizeParking Utilization Per Dwelling Unit

Parking Utilization

Inside - 20 0.53 64%Outside - 22 0.56 63%

- Family 14 0.84 72%- Seniors 13 0.46 71%- Special Needs 8 0.32 43%- Permanent Supportive 7 0.37 56%

Inside Family 8 0.85 74%Inside Seniors 5 0.44 73%Inside Special Needs 4 0.20 34%Inside Permanent Supportive 3 0.29 64%

Outside Family 6 0.82 70%Outside Seniors 8 0.48 69%Outside Special Needs 4 0.44 52%Outside Permanent Supportive 4 0.43 50%

LAMC for ComparisonParking Requirement per

UnitApartments (LAMC 12.21A.4(a))

<3 habitable rooms 13 habitable rooms 1.5>3 habitable rooms 2

Projects with Affordable Housing Density Bonus - Option 1 (applies to all units, not just restricted units) (LAMC 12.22A.25(d)(1))0-1 bedroom 12-3 bedrooms 24 or more bedrooms 2.5

Projects with Affordable Housing Density Bonus - Option 2 (applies to restricted units only) (LAMC 12.22A.25(d)(2))restricted affordable units 1restricted to low or very low income senior citizen or disabled 0.5restricted affordable units in residential hotel 0.25


5-19-0181 Page 17 of 20

300 Corpora

Transportation Plan

ate Pointe, Suite


C

470 | Culver City

On-Stree

Calculatio

y, CA | 90230

Atta

et Parking

on by Cit

Ph 310-473-650

achment B

g Amoun

ty of Sant

08 Fx 310-444

B

nt Modific

ta Monica

4-9771 www.c

cation

a Staff

March 12

crainandassociat

2, 2019

tes.com California Coastal Commission

Exhibit 4 5-19-0181

Page 18 of 20

1

Victor Ansley

From: Peter JamesSent: Monday, February 11, 2019 3:43 PMTo: Peter DzewaltowskiCc: Victor Ansley; Ross Fehrman; Jason KligierSubject: Re: Pacific Link

Thank you Peter D and Jay!

From: Peter Dzewaltowski Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 3:39:40 PM To: Peter James Cc: Victor Ansley; Ross Fehrman; Jason Kligier Subject: RE: Pacific Link Peter, Jay D and I put our heads together and came up with an estimate. Filling in the three driveways will allow the city to create 5 on‐street parking spaces on Lincoln Blvd. There will need to be 20 feet of red curb near the Pacific Street intersection. Let me know if you need more detail. Pete

From: Peter James Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 2:45 PM To: Peter Dzewaltowski <[email protected]> Cc: Victor Ansley <[email protected]>; Ross Fehrman <[email protected]>; Jason Kligier <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Pacific Link Peter D., I’m forwarding you an email from CCSM, who is designing a new project at 2120 Lincoln Blvd (south of the freeway) at the location of an existing 76 gas station. Victor, one of the project managers, is building a narrative for the Coastal Commission about how the project is adding new on‐street parking spaces in locations that were previously curb‐cuts (this particular gas station has at least 3 large driveway aprons). Would you mind briefly estimating the amount of parking that could be accommodated in the former curb‐cut locations? Plans are attached and Victor’s contact information is below. Similarly, you could provide Victor with standard dimensions and have him map it out. Thank you! Peter

From: Victor Ansley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 10:31 AM To: Peter James <[email protected]> California Coastal Commission

Exhibit 4 5-19-0181

Page 19 of 20

2

Cc: Ross Fehrman <[email protected]> Subject: Pacific Link Peter, Thanks for reaching out, I couldn’t make it, but we are very interested in keeping tabs on the updated plan. I was wondering if someone on your side could help us estimate the # of on street parking spaces that we might be able to provide at our future development. Would you happen to know who I should reach out to? This information will be critical for our Coastal Commission application. Thanks!

From: Peter James <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 12:55 PM To: Victor Ansley <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Landscape drafts and Transit report Hi Victor, Please come to the workshop tonight on the LiNC if you are able. We will have our landscape architect there. Thanks! Peter

From: Victor Ansley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 4:20 PM To: Peter James <[email protected]> Subject: Landscape drafts and Transit report Hey Peter, Thanks for coming to our review meeting today for 2120 Lincoln. It would be helpful for us to provide more information on our project’s role in promoting mobility and access on Lincoln blvd, would you mind sharing the staff report that describes bus ridership and the landscape plans for that area? Best, Victor A . A nsley A ssistant Project M anager Community Corporation of Santa Monica Please note - we've temporarily moved! Our current address is 1820 14th Street 1423 2nd Street, Suite B Santa M onica, CA 90401 T. 310.394.8487 x135 F. 310.975.6775

w w w .com m unitycorp.org Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

California Coastal Commission

Exhibit 4 5-19-0181

Page 20 of 20

(562) 590-5071 W9b · 2019-04-19 · T3 T1 T2 T1 T2 T3 T6 T5 DISPENSER ISLANDS MW6 MW4 MW1 MW6 AS3...

Documents

Transcript of (562) 590-5071 W9b · 2019-04-19 · T3 T1 T2 T1 T2 T3 T6 T5 DISPENSER ISLANDS MW6 MW4 MW1 MW6 AS3...